Common Sense: HR 6562
NOT ALL VETS HAPPY WITH IDEA OF A NEW AGENT ORANGE EQUITY ACT
While we applaud the intent of anyone who attempts to get benefits for Veterans exposed to Agent Orange anywhere, we cannot applaud their effect on HR 6562, the Agent Orange Equity Act of 2008, when it delays the benefits for a large segment of those Veterans. And that is exactly what the hijacking of HR 6562 has done.
In its original form, HR 6562 was a bill of beauty and simplicity. While it required refinement to give it specific and undeniable intent, it was confined to those Veterans who lost their benefits in 1993 [Blue Sky Air Force], in 2002 [Blue Water Navy, Coast Guard & Marine Corps Fleet Marine Force], and to those Veterans of the Vietnam War who should have been included under the Agent Orange Act of 1991, the Veterans of Thailand, Laos, and Cambodia [TLC] who engaged in combat operations against the enemy, or in direct support of those operations. Those Veterans are known to the members of Congress, and to Congress as a body. Except for the TLC Veterans, who should have been included by the DVA in their interpretation of the Agent Orange Act of 1991, that entire group received benefits under that act at one time. The TLC Veterans received the Vietnam Service Medal, which is what the DVA used as criteria to determine eligibility for presumptive exposure to Agent Orange.
That version of the bill would require a simple legislative process, minimal hearing time, and has already garnered support in advance from many in Congress. It stood a good chance of passage in the current session, and with a veto-proof margin in the Senate.
Thousands of Blue Water Navy Veterans and their loved ones have spent the past month pounding on the doors of their Representatives and Senators obtaining commitments of support for HR 6562. They were looking forward to the introduction of the bill in the Senate which would have been considered concurrently with the one in the House, thus streamlining the effort and giving it every chance to pass in this session.
Blue Water Navy, Coast Guard & Marine Corps Fleet Marine Force, Blue Sky Air Force, and TLC Veterans were actually seeing the likelihood of receiving benefits under the Agent Orange Act starting in late spring of 2009. There was light at the end of the tunnel.
We have advocated all along asking for the inclusion of those Veterans who served outside the Vietnam Theater of Operations [those Veterans who were not Blue Water Navy, Coast Guard & Marine Corps Fleet Marine Force, Blue Sky Air Force, or TLC], but were exposed to herbicide based dioxins. We advocated, however, for their benefits in a separate bill. The reason was simple: while the issue of those exposures in locations other than the Vietnam Theater of Operations is known to most members of Congress, those issues are not known to Congress itself. What this means is that most members of Congress are aware of the issues, but in their official capacity, Congress as a body, which is what passes legislation, lacks the understanding of the scope of those issues, the details of them, and the statistics behind them that would back them up. Passage of a bill authorizing benefits for those Veterans who served outside the Vietnam Theater of Operations will be a long, drawn out process, and one which will face more opposition from Congress than the originally intended HR 6562.
When Chairman Filner apparently announced that he would drop HR 6562 in favor of an all-inclusive bill for all Veterans everywhere, who were exposed to Agent Orange he was admitting that it would be a very long process while Congress sifts through all the new evidence of exposure for those who served outside the Vietnam Theater of Operations. The process would include hearing after hearing, and much debate on the floor of both chambers. Congress could take more than one session to move the legislation to a vote. That puts benefits for everyone currently not eligible for them under Department of Veterans Affairs rules to a window of winter 2009 to some time in 2010. That includes those Blue Water Navy, Coast Guard & Marine Corps Fleet Marine Force, Blue Sky Air Force, and TLC Veterans who could possibly have started to receive their benefits by late spring of 2009.
Adding those who served outside the Vietnam Theater of Operations forces those Veterans who served in the Vietnam Theater of Operations to wait much longer until the bill passes in its new form.
During that period of time, which spans from six months to a year and a half [or longer], many Veterans, who have claims pending will die. Many will be forced to sell their homes because they are too sick to work, and because Social Security Disability is not sufficient to keep them financially afloat, if they can get it. Others will go without medications, or without operations that could prolong their lives, alleviate pain and disability, and improve their quality of life. New widows will be made, and Veterans will suffer and die without a financial legacy to leave behind.
Of course it is in our self-interest to advocate for the quick passage of HR 6562 in its simplified form, restricted to only the Blue Water Navy, Coast Guard & Marine Corps Fleet Marine Force, Blue Sky Air Force, and TLC Veterans. By making the Agent Orange Act of 1991 applicable to any and all who served in Vietnam, off shore of Vietnam, in the skies over Vietnam, and in Laos, Thailand, and Cambodia, who received the Vietnam Service Medal, HR 6562 stands a very good chance of passage this session.
If that comes to pass, many Veterans will be spared the physical and financial heartbreak, obtain the medications and operations needed to save their lives, and improve the quality of those lives, and assure the financial legacy and security to their eventual survivors.
We do not think that is too much to ask. It would NOT be leaving anyone behind, merely preceding them in the receipt of their benefits. And Blue Water Navy Veterans are committed to carrying the fight forward after receipt of their own benefits. They would work just as hard to gain Congressional support for a bill providing relief for those exposed to Agent Orange outside of the Vietnam Theater of Operations.
VNVets
”It is a stain on this nation’s honor that the Department of Veterans Affairs has become a deadlier and more difficult adversary to the American veteran than any they have ever faced on a battlefield."– VNVets
"The concept that Agent Orange, and its effects, stopped dead in its tracks at the shoreline is simply too illogical, and too ludicrous to accept. What does that say about the Bush Administration and his Department of Veterans Affairs?"–VNVets
"With malice toward none; with charity for all; with firmness in the right, as God gives us to see the right, let us strive on to finish the work we are in; to bind up the nation’s wounds; to care for him who shall have borne the battle, and for his widow, and his orphan–to do all which may achieve and cherish a just and lasting peace, among ourselves, and with all nations." –President Abraham Lincoln
"Without a decisive naval force we can do nothing definitive, and with it, everything honorable and glorious."–President George Washington
Original Posting: http://vnvets.blogspot.com/2008/08/common-sense.html Visit VNVets Blog at www.vnvets.blogspot.com
Related Posts:
Short URL: http://www.veteranstoday.com/?p=3490
Posted by Veterans Today on Aug 25 2008, With 0 Reads, Filed under Legislation. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
COMMENTS
To post, we ask that you login using Facebook, Yahoo, AOL, or Hotmail in the box below.Don't have a social network account? Register and Login direct with VT and post.
Before you post, read our Comment Policy - Feedback
FACEBOOK
TWITTER























I was turn down again on feb 19. 2009 for the third time by the VA . I went to the Jasper Alabama VA office to reopen my case, the people told me that theirs was nothing that they could do for me any more . that I need to go some were else, find a lawer or something, go to the American Leagion . So I called the American Leagion in Carbon Hill Alabama and talked to some there and the man said I was fighting a loosing battle aqnd needed to just to forget about it . So I have been asking around on the net to see if I need to refile or not so can any one here give me some advice .
Steve Marion Smarion740@aol.com
I am a U.S. Army veteran who served in Laos in 1962 assigned to the White Star Mobile Training Team. I have, repeatedly, been denied Veteran Pension Supplement payments because I have no wartime duty. Laos in 1962 was certainly a wartime posting. Awards of Combat Infantry Badges and names on the Viet Nam Memorial Wall attest to that. Has anyone else experienced these denials?
Wilson Baker
svmarcopolo@yahoo.com