Thursday, March 18, 2010.

Common heart abnormality linked to risks

July 1, 2009 by John Allen · 1 Comment 

By Thomas H. Maugh II

Researchers connect the condition, called an increased PR interval, to a substantially higher risk of erratic heartbeats and need for a pacemaker, as well as risk of death.

A common heart abnormality often seen of electrocardiograms that has long been thought to be inconsequential is actually associated with a substantially increased risk of erratic heartbeats or a need for a pacemaker — and with a modestly increased risk of death, researchers reported today.

Although there is no treatment to forestall such events, the presence of the abnormality should lead to increased monitoring of the patients to detect problems early, the team reported in the Journal of the American Medical Assn.

     

The abnormality, called an increased PR interval, "is fairly common in healthy people. We see it often in clinical practice and typically assume that it is a benign finding," said Dr. Thomas J. Wang of Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, the lead author.

But the condition is also seen in people with congenital heart disease and other problems, "so we know that it is not always so benign," Wang said.

The PR interval is the time it takes for an electrical signal emitted by the heart’s natural pacemaker to spread from the upper chambers of the heart to the lower chambers. A PR interval of less than 200 microseconds is considered normal.

Wang and his colleagues studied 7,575 individuals enrolled in the multi-decade, government-funded Framingham Heart Study of residents of a Massachusetts town.

The participants had a mean age of 47 when they underwent an electrocardiogram examination in 1968 through 1974, and they were followed through 2007. Over the years, 481 developed erratic heartbeats, 124 required a pacemaker and 1,739 died.

At the beginning of the study, 124 individuals had PR intervals longer than 200 microseconds. They had about twice the risk of atrial fibrillation, about three times the risk of requiring a pacemaker and about a 40% increased risk of death from all causes.

"The [increased] PR interval is a red flag for physicians to be on the alert for these things," said Dr. Albert Waldo of University Hospitals Case Medical Center in Cleveland, who was not involved in the study.

A longer PR interval "might be an early marker for fibrosis and scarring," or other problems, said Dr. John Kennedy of Marina del Rey Hospital, who was also not part of the study.

Patients with a prolonged PR interval "should be looking more closely for signs of problems, such as palpitations, lightheadedness and fatigue," Kennedy added.

thomas.maugh@latimes.com

  • Share/Bookmark
Related Products & Services:

Get Your Loan Now Get Your Loan Now Get Your Loan Now Get Your Loan Now Apply for your VA Home Loan Now Apply for your VA Home Loan Now Apply for your VA Home Loan Now Apply for Jobs on HireVeterans.com Now Apply for Jobs on HireVeterans.com Now Apply for Jobs on HireVeterans.com Now Apply for Jobs on HireVeterans.com Now Buy RevvNRG Direct Online Join a Winning Team Join a Winning Team Join a Winning Team Honor and Remember our Veterans Get Educated at Excelsior College Get Educated at Excelsior College Get Educated at Excelsior College

Comments

One Response to “Common heart abnormality linked to risks”
  1. Al Fullbright says:

    I cant really say I understood the article that well. I suffer from sic sinus syndrome, and have a slow heartbeat. I received a pacemaker in 2003 and I have felt like I was in slow motion ever since. I have real-time problems with acceleration.

    I have never served in the military, but recieved extensive injuries as a crime-victim. I believe that a lot of the problems I have with Arythmia has resulted from Post Traumatic Stress. I am still afraid of my own shadow and seldom leave the house without someone with me. Almost eight years have gone by since I got my pacemaker. I’m still alive, but I’m not sure how useful.

    I dont know exactly how it works, but some of the autonomous things that make our body work are hugely affected by how we experience things.

Speak Your Mind

Tell us what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!

Quick Links: Asbestos & Mesothelioma - Mesothelioma Cancer Center - Mesothelioma Lawyers - Mesothelioma Treatment
Hundreds of thousands of servicemen were exposed to asbestos over decades, especially during the period from 1940 to 1980. Asbestos was used in construction of naval vessels as well as shore facilities. All branches of the military used asbestos, which was also widely used in civilian applications. Asbestos can cause mesothelioma. Because this cancer has a particularly long latency period, many servicemen who were exposed years ago are now developing this disease. - Mesothelioma Patient & Family Resources: Mesotheliomahelp is provided by Belluck & Fox, LLP as a comprehensive resource for mesothelioma victims and their families.  The site provides up-to-date information on the latest news and treatment options as well as an easy to use search feature to find local mesothelioma doctors and health care clinics.  - We fight for veterans harmed by asbestos: Veterans with mesothelioma or asbestos-related lung cancer should know they have options: the opportunity to bring a suit against manufacturers and sellers of the asbestos that caused their illness. If you were harmed by asbestos exposure, for example, in ships or military housing, contact Weitz & Luxenberg to get a free case review. - Important Information for Veterans: Asbestos products were often used on military ships and within military housing, and Veterans may have been exposed. Previous exposure to asbestos is the only known cause of mesothelioma, a fatal cancer that has no cure and affects countless Veterans and loved ones. For more information regarding military asbestos exposure visit Mesothelioma.com