<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama wants record $708B for military next year &#8211; Washington Post</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/01/14/obama-wants-record-708b-for-military-next-year-washington-post/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/01/14/obama-wants-record-708b-for-military-next-year-washington-post/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=obama-wants-record-708b-for-military-next-year-washington-post</link>
	<description>Military Veterans and Foreign Affairs Journal - VA - Veterans Administration</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 05:54:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Isn’t Defense Spending Being Frozen Too? &#171; Coreys Views</title>
		<link>http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/01/14/obama-wants-record-708b-for-military-next-year-washington-post/comment-page-1/#comment-36794</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Isn’t Defense Spending Being Frozen Too? &#171; Coreys Views</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 14:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://127.0.0.1/?p=10144#comment-36794</guid>
		<description>[...] insisted that further cuts could still be made. Yet the Pentagon budget — which is expected to exceed $700 billion when Obama unveils his budget on Feb. 1st — remains inexplicably exempt from the spending [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] insisted that further cuts could still be made. Yet the Pentagon budget — which is expected to exceed $700 billion when Obama unveils his budget on Feb. 1st — remains inexplicably exempt from the spending [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Isn&#8217;t Defense Spending Being Frozen Too? &#171; SpeakEasy</title>
		<link>http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/01/14/obama-wants-record-708b-for-military-next-year-washington-post/comment-page-1/#comment-36678</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Isn&#8217;t Defense Spending Being Frozen Too? &#171; SpeakEasy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 23:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://127.0.0.1/?p=10144#comment-36678</guid>
		<description>[...] insisted that further cuts could still be made. Yet the Pentagon budget — which is expected to exceed $700 billion when Obama unveils his budget on Feb. 1st — remains inexplicably exempt from the spending [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] insisted that further cuts could still be made. Yet the Pentagon budget — which is expected to exceed $700 billion when Obama unveils his budget on Feb. 1st — remains inexplicably exempt from the spending [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Axelrod Struggles To Explain Why Obama’s Spending Freeze Doesn’t Include Defense Funding &#124; Pure Politics</title>
		<link>http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/01/14/obama-wants-record-708b-for-military-next-year-washington-post/comment-page-1/#comment-36667</link>
		<dc:creator>Axelrod Struggles To Explain Why Obama’s Spending Freeze Doesn’t Include Defense Funding &#124; Pure Politics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 22:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://127.0.0.1/?p=10144#comment-36667</guid>
		<description>[...] that further cuts could still be made. Yet the Pentagon budget &#8212; which is expected to exceed $700 billion when Obama unveils his budget on Feb. 1st &#8212; remains inexplicably exempt from the spending [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that further cuts could still be made. Yet the Pentagon budget &#8212; which is expected to exceed $700 billion when Obama unveils his budget on Feb. 1st &#8212; remains inexplicably exempt from the spending [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

