Who Killed Colonel James E. Sabow, USMC?
January 23, 2010 posted by Robert O'Dowd · 10 Comments

Courtesy: Dr. David Sabow
Nineteen years ago today, a Marine Corps Colonel was murdered at MCAS El Toro, California. His brother has relentlessly pursued the investigation of his death for all of these years. Guns, drugs, and a government cover-up make this a perfect crime.
(IRVINE, CA) – On January 22, 1991, Marine Colonel James E. Sabow, age 51, was found dead by his wife in the backyard of his quarters at MCAS El Toro, California. The Orange County Coroner ruled the death a suicide. Investigation by the Naval Criminal Investigation Service (NCIS) reported suicide as the cause of death. However, on a review of the autopsy reports and other evidence, his family and other medical professionals and forensic experts strongly disagree. Dr. David Sabow, a neurologist from Rapid City, South Dakota, continues the effort to clear his brother’s name, devoting much of the past 19 years and his personal financial resources to this cause.
Dr. Sabow provides support and convincing arguments that Colonel Sabow was clubbed to death in his backyard and then shot in the head with his own shotgun to suggest suicide. The motive for the murder was to stop Colonel Sabow from exposing criminal weapons and drug smuggling from and to military bases (See: http://www.colonelsabow.com/).
After hearing this story from another Marine veteran, I have to admit at first that I was skeptical and unconvinced of a government cover-up of the murder of decorated Marine Corps officer. My view of government conspiracies involving the deaths of President Kennedy and Martin Luther King, MKULTRA and even 911 is there mostly grist for cheap paperback novels.
However, after reading the accounts of Colonel Sabow’s tragic death now I’m not so sure.
Why would a Marine Colonel, happily married and the father of two children, with 28 years in the Marine Corps who had faced death countless times with 221 combat missions in an A-6 Intruder in Vietnam and no medical history of depression or PTSD take his own life and not even leave a suicide note?
Colonel Sabow, described by other officers who knew him as a straight as an arrow Marine, objected to the illegal transit of drugs on unmarked C-130 aircraft.
Relieved of his duties by Brigadier General Adams, Commanding General, MCAS El Toro, for some minor infraction of the rules and pressured to retire from the Marines, he told senior Marine officers that he would disclose all he knew about the shipment of guns for drugs at a court martial.
The unmarked C-130s unloaded their drug cargo in the Marine Wing Support Group 37 area in the southwest quadrant of the base in the early morning hours. This is the most industrialized portion of the base. Coincidentally, I know the area well. As a young Marine in the 1960s, I worked in one of the two huge maintenance hangars in MWSG-37. Even after 40 plus years, I still remember the distinctive sound of the C-130 turboprops keeping me awake in the early morning hours on duty watch in the hangar.
Marines were told to stay away from this portion of the base. David Hoffman reported that a Sgt. Robinson, a former El Toro Marine MP, and Captain Harries, the El Toro Provost Marshall, were told by Colonel Joseph Underwood, Chief of Staff, MCAS El Toro, when the subject of C-130s landing at the base late at night to: ‘Keep your ass off the airstrip at night. Leave those airplanes alone. Don’t go near them. Don’t worry about them.’ (See: www.american-buddha.com/semper.fidelis.htm )
According to Dr. Sabow: “Colonel Sabow was Chief of Operations for Marine Air, Western Area. Shortly before his death, he learned of criminal activity by higher officials at El Toro Marine Air Base and others, involving illegal weapon shipments to Latin America, and drug shipments into various military bases on the return flights. He was intent on exposing these activities. The cover-up involves the DOD, the FBI and others.”
Guns for Drugs
The involvement of the CIA in drug trafficking in Central America during the Reagan Administration as part of the Contra war in Nicaragua was the subject of several official and journalistic investigations since the mid-1980s.
In 1987, the Senate Subcommittee on Narcotics, Terrorism and International Operations, led by Senator John Kerry, launched an investigation of contra-drug links:
”The logic of having drug money pay for pressings needs of the Contras appealed to a number of people who became involved in the covert war. Indeed, senior U.S. policy makers were not immune to the idea that drug money was a perfect solution to the Contra’s funding problems.”
“As DEA officials testified last July before the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime, Lt. Col Oliver North suggested to the DEA in June 1985 that $1.5 million in drug money carried aboard a plane piloted by DEA informant Barry Seal and generated in a sting of the Medellin Cartel and Sandinista officials, be provided to the Contras. While the suggestion was rejected by the DEA, the fact that it was made highlights the potential appeal of drug profits for persons engaged in covert activity.”
“Lotz [the head of the Costa Rican Air Force and personal pilot to two presidents] said that Contra operations on the Southern Front were in fact funded by drug operations. He testified that weapons for the Contras came from Panama on small planes carrying mixed loads which included drugs. The pilots unloaded the weapons, refueled, and headed north toward the U.S. with drugs.” (See: http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB2/ccc5_1.gif ) \
In fact, there’s evidence that El Toro was used as transient point for drug shipments into the United States. David Hoffman quotes testimony from a June 5, 1996, Defense Department Office of the Inspector General report: “Mr. [Gene] Wheaton alleged that MCAS El Toro was being used in support of a legal covert activity that had been undertaken by a U.S. intelligence agency under the cover of a U.S. Department of Agriculture program named “Screw Worm,” allegedly a program to eradicate the screw worm in Mexico. Mr. Wheaton also alleged that the covert operation was actually legitimately providing weapons, ammunition and other material to the Government of Peru in their struggle against guerrilla forces know as the “Shining Path.” Mr. Wheaton further alleged that a number of individuals involved in this covert operation were concurrently conducting an illegal covert operation whereby they were smuggling additional weapons, ammunition and material to Peru. The individuals were allegedly selling the weapons, ammunition and material to the Shining Path as well as to the Government of Peru, for money and narcotics. The money and narcotics were then allegedly smuggled back into the United States and air dropped at remote locations on military installations in the western part of the United States…. Mr. Wheaton further alleged that this operation continued until approximately the time of Col. Sabow’s death.” (See: http://www.american-buddha.com/semper.fidelis.htm#fn34 )
So in effective, the motive for Colonel Sabow’s murder was to prevent him from disclosing the use of former military aircraft to illegally ship guns for drugs. This all sounds too familiar. It all goes back to the green. Based on the information reported by Dr. Sabow, David Hoffman and others on the internet, there’s enough evidence for a motive to murder.
Forensic Evidence Supports Murder
I’m not a trained forensic expert or even an amateur ‘Sherlock Homes,’ but the evidence to support murder as presented by Dr. David Sabow appears overwhelming (See: http://colonelsabow.com/evidence.html ).
In my view, some of the damming evidence supporting the murder of this officer are:
1. Head Contusion: The body of Colonel Sabow showed “an orange-sized contusion existed behind the right ear and extended downward to the neck.” The autopsy showed a massive blood clot…within that swollen area and between the scalp and skull. Skull x-rays were taken and showed a large depressed skull fracture under the blood clot with the fragment pressed inward over 3/4 in. deep. Since the victim was alleged to have shot himself in the mouth, any displaced fragments should have been blown outward not inward.” And, “X-rays showed that there were no shotgun pellets nor bone spicules within the blood clot.” The conclusion was “the swelling (contusion) of the back of the head and the depressed skull fracture is characteristic of an external blunt force applied to the right occipital area of the skull. It is inconsistent with an intaoral shotgun wound.” In short, Colonel Sabow was hit on the head by someone intent on killing him or at the very least knocking him unconscious.
2. Skull X-Ray: Skull x-rays taken at the Orange County Medical Examiner’s facility show a “large depressed occipital skull fracture.” The x-rays were reviewed by university medical specialists. “A conference at the University of Minnesota consisting of three Professors of Neuroradiology and three Professors of Neurosurgery evaluated these x-rays and corresponding autopsy photos. Their conclusions were: the fracture was from blunt force inflicted to the right posterior skull; the fracture could not have occurred as a result of the gunshot; from a review of the photos, it was apparent that the blunt force occurred prior to death.”
3. Fingerprints: There are no fingerprints on the 12 gauge Ithaca shotgun found under the body of Colonel Sabow. As related by Dr. Sabow, the “gun was stored in a scabbard-style gun case on a shelf in a vacant bedroom.” If Colonel Sabow shot himself, he would have had to remove the gun from the scabbard, carry the gun through the house from the garage to the backyard; place the gun on a counter in the garage and open a cabinet and remove a box filled with ammunition and place it on the counter; select two shells from one of boxes; break open the shotgun and load the shells into the chamber; close the shotgun and place it on the counter; replace the box of ammunition in the cabinet and reclasp the cabinet; carry the gun across the yard; place the butt of the shotgun on the ground and grasp the barrel with his left hand while reaching down with his right to depress the trigger. All of these activities would have left Colonel Sabow’s fingerprints on the shotguns. A dead man doesn’t wipe clean the weapon used to kill himself. The only reasonable conclusion is that Colonel Sabow did not pull the trigger of the shotgun.
4. Blood Filled Lungs: the autopsy report, in part, stated that “no intact brainstem could be identified” and the right lung contained “large amount of aspirated blood…hemorrhage more marked on the right side …lumens of trachea and bronchi have large amount of aspirated blood.” Dr. Sabow observed that “it is absolutely impossible to breathe without an intact brainstem. Not even a gasp! This victim was not only brain dead but, was actually, “brain absent”. Furthermore, there was “disintegration of the superior end of the spinal cord.” The victim could not have aspirated blood after being shot! The conclusion was the Colonel Sabow had to be “have been very actively breathing blood while he was still alive and, obviously, before he was shot, for death would have been instantaneous after the shot.”
5. Blow to Head: Dr. Jack Feldman, Professor of Neuroscience and Chairman of the Department of Physiologic Science at UCLA concluded: “Col. Sabow was rendered unconscious or immobile by a blow to the head that fractured the base of the skull, causing bleeding into the pharynx. Breathing continued after the injury, aspirating blood into the lung. At sometime later, a shotgun was placed in the mouth and triggered (by another party), causing death and obscuring any evidence of prior injury. I conclude that the evidence does not support …a self-inflicted gunshot wound”.
There’s no statue of limitation on murder. However, it’s doubtfull that any grand jury will ever hear any of the forensic evidence supporting homicide. The F.B.I. and Justice Department have shown no interest according to Dr. Sabow.
We don’t know the names of the killers. David Hoffman’s internet account of the murder provides the names of senior Marine Corps officers connected with Colonel Sabow’s murder.
The murder was committed on a U.S. military base in Orange County, California. There are no witnesses. MCAS El Toro was closed in July 1999. The perfect crime. Maybe. The good guys don’t always win.
Take a few moments today to remember in prayer Colonel Sabow and his family.































Well done, Bob O’Dowd. If the evidence you claim is accurate, there is no question it was murder. Whether it had to do with drugs or not, I can’t say. But in that timeframe, drugs were rampant around the El Toro and the Laguna Hills area. That crap destroyed many a family and business in Orange County, military and civilian. Of course, El Toro was off-limits to the local police.
BTW, are you any relation to the O’Dowd family in the South Seattle area?
Cheers on a well-written, thoughful article. Tom, Houston Grunt.
Tom,
The forensic evidence was supported by professional experts and documented by Dr. David Sabow, Colonel Jim Sabow’s brother. I have no doubt that it is accurate. The information on the drug connection and use of C-130 aircraft to transport drugs from Central and South America came from David Hoffman, investigative journalist. Dr. Sabow believes that his brother was killed to cover up the government’s drug-smuggling activities. Fantasy or fact? The issue would have been resolved in a court martial but that never happened after Colonel Sabow’s death.
No, to my knowledge I’m not related to the O’Dowd family in the Seattle area.
The cover up has extended into the prevention of the publishing of the scientific analysis of the evidence associated with the death of Colonel Sabow. I along with Dr. Jozef Lebiedzic analyzed the gunshot residue (GSR) burden of Colonel Sabow’s clothing (www.meixatech.com/SabowGSR.pdf ). Dr. Lebiedzik, who performed the SDEM/EDS analysis, declined authorship since I put it all together. I intended to publish the paper in the Journal of Forensic Sciences (JOFS), the official publication of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences (AAFS). Aware of that the DoD would likely try to prevent publication, I first submitted the paper to the members of the Yahoo list serve, Forensic_SEM, a list serve set up by the FBI to bring together scanning electron microscopists. The major topic of the posts over the years has been issues relating to GSR. We now have over 200 members. The paper received no criticisms (if there was a technical/interpretation problem, I would have been informed) and two members actually wrote reviews strongly positive. I received the following reviews from the editor (Mike Peat) of the JOFS:
Reviewer(s)’ Comments to Author:
Reviewer: 1
Comments to the Author
While this submission may have some promise as a case report, as written it is not a scientific study but rather a rebuttal of another individual’s opinion which was apparently proffered during the course of an investigation. As such, in my opinion it does not meet the standards of the JFS for publication. The article needs to be rewritten so that it addresses only the science.
Reviewer: 2
Comments to the Author
1. Does the author have permissions to publish these results of a governmental inquiry? 2. Not all references are publicly available (ie, Nordby’s report) 3. The author is promoting the interpretation of homicide; is this an open investigation?
In my almost forty year of publishing reviewed scientific papers, of which I have more than 70 (www.meixatech.com/cv.pdf), I have never, ever, received reviewers’ comments that were outright insulting as these are. It is also obvious both reviewers did not read the paper. I can only conclude that the DoD has managed to screw with the JOFS editor and its reviewers. I lodged a complaint with the Editorial Board of the JOFS.
Yaa, this is an absolute. Look into the Christic Institute Lawsuit of the Eighties, that helpeed expose the Guns for drugs opereration, or more aptly named ‘The Israel, Iran, Contra, Cocaine Affair’, Or the Iran Contra Affair. Reagan 125 out of 150 questions, ‘Could not recall’. I don’t want to empower the Christics, because their lawsuit was finally thrown out as a ‘ fairy tale’ by an appeals judge who said he didn’t read it. All the money collected from the left, went, in a summary judgement, to the Right. Bruce Springsteen, Bonnie Rait, Et Al, gave great performances, but the money collected had to be summarily delivered to the defendants and their lawyers. Yet, the Ayatollah, the man who alledgedly held us hostage at the Iranian embassy for four hundred plus days, during the waning days of Carter, where there were gas rationing lines, fights at the gas stations, was again, a manipulation by the ‘Right’. Right wing, conservative, Adolph loves you, right wing Republicans. Richard Secord, Gen. Singlaub, Oliver North(YA that talk radio host, like Darrel Gates, former LAPD chief, who refused to step down, inventor of SWAT, They always have a voice.), were seen to be involved,(Not Gates) in the botched rescue attempt by Carter, of our hostages in October 1981. This later, with the expose’ of the TOW missles to the Ayatollah, in the IRAN CONTRA AFFAIR, shows how some aspects of our government funds the ‘ENEMY’, to Keep the ball Rollin’. Look up how Prescott Bush was, with Union Bank funding the Nazis, while we were at war with them…there is more, just want you to savor this for a while. ANd listen to Reagans rebuff, when he found we had traded arms for hosages. IT’S HYTERICAL! Something like, “In my heart I don’t feel it’s true, although the evidence points to something different”…(Paraphrased) HAVE A NICE DAY!
Wanted to correct myself. The ‘botched’ rescue attempt was October, 1980, NOT 1981. And it was a Delta Force Operation, where nine Americans died in the desert. In speaking to numerous Iranians here in America through the years, they all know about the missile deals and the fact that the Iranians in Iran, October, 1980, knew 24 hours in advance that we were coming. I do not believe, think, or hold Carter responsible for the failed attempt. There were moles and weasils within our Government. They were right wingers, and Adolph loves them. Thankyou, Sorry about the first factual error.
Yes. This should be looked into in detail. I did testify three times to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and to Senator John Kerry and staff with documented information and detailed references. Most of the information in article above (at a later date) was given to those committees, under oath, concerning guns for drugs as well as the, “CIA Mexico Thing”, the information and testimony was “classified committee sensitive”, and remains so as of this date. Additional documentation with references was given to then Senator Gary Hart (1985*1.., and 1991) with detailed maps, names and dates noted long before the Iran Contra affair was exposed to the public. Leslie Cockburn, who wrote the book “Out of Control” (1987) and CBS producer Ty West, received detailed information concerning “Point West” aka Santa Elena Costa Rica and its “secret airfield” which was used for drug running and Contra-Resupply activities of the time: Some of these flights did route into El Torro as well as other drop points, as early as 1988 through 1991. DEA agent Ki Ki Camarena, also received most of the Senate information concerning CIA pilots and The Mexico CIA Thing, as it was called. He and his pilot Alverez were kidnapped, tortured, and murdered in Mexico as a result of the exposed Mexico CIA matter.
reference *1: http://toshplumlee.info/pdf/sengaryhart.PDF
In May of 2009, I received a very stern warning from a “source” who claimed to be a “friend” from the DoD who was also, according to the source, previously with the DIA in 1987. “Perhaps it would be best for all concern if you would just dropped your investigation of the Col.”, he said. “This is a friend talking to you.., just trying to help”.
On back checking I could find no reference to this, “source”, and nothing more has been said to me. Seems the Sabow case is still a real fire-cracker. On another matter. My request to de- classified portions of my testimony to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee has been turned down. “methods and procedures”, it was said to be the reasons. This only took nine years to get a reply.
In the years of the 1990′s there were many suspected deaths of high ranking military men the kind of which made no sense. Deaths of professiona military men and all accused of suicide. And, odd airplane accidents killing politicians, and their families, etc, it went on and on. At a government work place I cannot divulge, the whispers were of presidential involvements in all these deaths.
If James Sabow let it be known he was going to testify in court regarding covert anything, that is good enough for someone powerful to have him killed.
God Bless James E. Sabow.
“My view of government conspiracies involving the deaths of President Kennedy and Martin Luther King, MKULTRA and even 911 is there mostly grist for cheap paperback novels.”
MKULTRA-”grist” for “cheap paperback novels”? I think not my friend. Its existence (at least in the past) is supported by congressional investigations, CIA testimonials, and actual physical documents that you and I and anyone else with access to the internet can read. A simple search on Wikipedia will tell you as much. To deny the crimes of MKULTRA would be like denying the murder of Colonel Sabow. Ask Dr. Olson’s family if they think MKULTRA never happened.
Here’s another article concerning the Governments involvement in cocaine and heroin trafficking.
http://www.mega.nu:8080/ampp/webb.html