<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dworkin: GOP Court Decision Is &#8220;Devastating&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/01/29/dworkin-gop-court-decision-is-devastating/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/01/29/dworkin-gop-court-decision-is-devastating/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=dworkin-gop-court-decision-is-devastating</link>
	<description>Military Veterans and Foreign Affairs Journal - VA - Veterans Administration</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 01:15:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Maloon</title>
		<link>http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/01/29/dworkin-gop-court-decision-is-devastating/comment-page-1/#comment-36852</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Maloon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 19:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.veteranstoday.com/?p=12586#comment-36852</guid>
		<description>Re: Dworkin:
I had never heard of you until 2 days ago and the fact you have been overlooked for consideration to the Supreme Court is transparent by you article , as is your hysteria regarding anything that is put out by the big bad corporation. Come in from the cold please! Maybe you should take a few classes in liberal arts.

R</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Dworkin:<br />
I had never heard of you until 2 days ago and the fact you have been overlooked for consideration to the Supreme Court is transparent by you article , as is your hysteria regarding anything that is put out by the big bad corporation. Come in from the cold please! Maybe you should take a few classes in liberal arts.</p>
<p>R</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Griffith</title>
		<link>http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/01/29/dworkin-gop-court-decision-is-devastating/comment-page-1/#comment-36581</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Griffith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 16:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.veteranstoday.com/?p=12586#comment-36581</guid>
		<description>Dworkin&#039;s analysis is ridiculous and doesn&#039;t even deal with the crux of the majority&#039;s arguments, starting with the fact that nowhere does the Constitution even remotely give the government the power to tell businesses, unions, or nonprofits that they can&#039;t buy political ads.  That is a brazen violation of the right of free speech guaranteed by the First Amendment.

These macabre doom-and-gloom predictions about the consequences of the decision simply ignore history.  Indirect contributions (i.e., political ads paid for by a corporation itself) were not addressed in law until 1947 (please, no one try to cite the 1907 Tillman Act--that&#039;s a non-starter).  Gee, I seemed to recall that liberals did pretty well at electing fellow liberals to Congress and to the White House prior to 1947.  Furthermore, the 1947 act was a wet noodle that was rarely if ever enforced.  Campaign finance law as we know it didn&#039;t come into being until the 1970s.

Finally, allow me to debunk Gordon Duff&#039;s hysteria that the decision opens the door for foreign companies and foreign nationals to buy political ads.  No, it does not.  In fact, the ruling specifically excludes foreign-owned corporations and foreign nations.  Gordon would know that if he&#039;d bother to actually read the decision.

http://www.lewrockwell.com/napolitano/napolitano14.1.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dworkin&#8217;s analysis is ridiculous and doesn&#8217;t even deal with the crux of the majority&#8217;s arguments, starting with the fact that nowhere does the Constitution even remotely give the government the power to tell businesses, unions, or nonprofits that they can&#8217;t buy political ads.  That is a brazen violation of the right of free speech guaranteed by the First Amendment.</p>
<p>These macabre doom-and-gloom predictions about the consequences of the decision simply ignore history.  Indirect contributions (i.e., political ads paid for by a corporation itself) were not addressed in law until 1947 (please, no one try to cite the 1907 Tillman Act&#8211;that&#8217;s a non-starter).  Gee, I seemed to recall that liberals did pretty well at electing fellow liberals to Congress and to the White House prior to 1947.  Furthermore, the 1947 act was a wet noodle that was rarely if ever enforced.  Campaign finance law as we know it didn&#8217;t come into being until the 1970s.</p>
<p>Finally, allow me to debunk Gordon Duff&#8217;s hysteria that the decision opens the door for foreign companies and foreign nationals to buy political ads.  No, it does not.  In fact, the ruling specifically excludes foreign-owned corporations and foreign nations.  Gordon would know that if he&#8217;d bother to actually read the decision.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.lewrockwell.com/napolitano/napolitano14.1.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.lewrockwell.com/napolitano/napolitano14.1.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cheryl Knee</title>
		<link>http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/01/29/dworkin-gop-court-decision-is-devastating/comment-page-1/#comment-36559</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheryl Knee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 13:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.veteranstoday.com/?p=12586#comment-36559</guid>
		<description>Bravo, Ronald Dworkin! This supreme court decision is outrageous!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bravo, Ronald Dworkin! This supreme court decision is outrageous!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

