FACEBOOK
TWITTER
Congressional Tug-of-War Over Veterans’ Healthcare
An unknown number of veterans and dependents were exposed to environmental hazards on military installations. DOD refuses to accept responsibility for the health effects of exposure. Two bills introduced in the Senate and House provide for health care coverage. Major differences in the bills need to be worked out.
(WASHINGTON D.C.) – The Department of Defense (DOD)’s refusal to accept responsibility for the health effects of exposure to contaminated water at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, has left veterans and their dependents, many without health care, out in the cold.
Both the Senate and the House have introduced bills to provide the needed heath care, but the differences between the bills will require bipartisanship compromise.
The Senate bill includes environmental hazards at all military installations (except for those in Iraqi and Afghanistan) while the House bill covers only Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune, North Carolina.
Other differences are potential deal breakers. The Senate bill requires that DOD provide health care through its TRICARE insurance program while the House bill gives the VA the responsibility for both veterans and dependents health care.
On January 28th, the Senate Committee on Veterans Affairs voted 9 to 5 along party lines in favor of an original bill sponsored by Senator Daniel Akaka (D, HI) to provide health care through the DOD TRICARE insurance program to Camp Lejeune veterans and dependents and exposed to environmental hazards from the contaminated base water wells.
The Akaka bill, “Examination of Exposures to Environmental Hazards During Military Service Act of 2010” requires that DOD provide compensation or health care to other veterans and dependents of other military installations whenever an Advisory Board found evidence of exposure to environmental hazards.
The bill excludes exposure to an environmental hazard at a military installation during a period when imminent danger pay is authorized. My read on this is that the exposure from contaminants in the Iraqi burn pits is excluded.
An Iraqi veteran who has been exposed to the toxins from the burn pits and is experiencing a breathing problem should file a disability claim with the VA. The C&P exam should include a Pulmonary Function Test (PFT) and as Jim Strickland, Veterans Advocate, noted “that will be an important baseline marker for your future.”[1]
In a press release, Senator Akaka noted that “Based on what I have seen, it appears clear that elements in the Department of Defense have been less than forthcoming in addressing these concerns [potential exposures to toxic substances at Camp Lejeune. That failure does not relieve the Defense Department of its responsibility, nor mean that the burden should be placed on the Veterans Affairs Department.”
Scientists with the National Research Council (NRC) admit that "evidence exists that people who lived or worked at Camp Lejeune Marine Base in North Carolina between the 1950s and 1985 were exposed to the industrial solvents trichloroethylene (TCE) or perchloroethelyne (PCE) in their water supply."
The NRC report funded by the Navy stated that, "...strong scientific evidence is not available to determine whether health problems among those exposed are due to the contaminants." Among these heath conditions are birth defects, childhood leukemia, liver damage, and male breast cancer.
Other scientists disagree with the NRC report’s findings, expressing disappointment that the NRC report which took two years in the preparation “reached puzzling and in some cases erroneous conclusions.”[2]
The Senate Veterans Affairs Committee has jurisdiction over the Department of Veterans Affairs. The Akaka bill will be reported by SVAC and go on the Senate calendar. There is no requirement that SASC be involved. It’s possible that SASC will seek to be involved but that has not happened to date, according to a Congressional source.
The problem is the Senate Armed Service Committee’s leadership supports DOD, according to another Congressional source.
Senator Akaka’s bill is not the first Congressional attempt to address the need for medical care for those injured by the health effects of exposure to contaminated water at Camp Lejeune.
Senator Richard Burr (R, NC), Ranking Minority member of the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee, in July 2009 introduced S-1518, “Caring for Camp Lejeune Veterans Act of 2009.”
The Department of Veterans Affairs is the designated health care provider in S-1518. However, Senator Burr’s bill could not clear the Senate Committee on Veterans Affairs.
Senator Burr vowed to continue the fight and to attach his bill to any bill on the Senate floor, whenever the occasion arose.
Acknowledging DOD’s hostility to providing health care benefits, Senator Burr commented: “The committee’s vote today [January 28th] supposes that somehow by immaculate conception health care will appear for these veterans and their families.”
A companion bill to S-1518 was introduced in the House on February 2nd.
Representative Brad Miller (D, NC) introduced “The Janey Ensminger Act,” which requires the Department of Veterans Affairs to provide health care to veterans and their family members who have experienced adverse health effects as a result of exposure to contaminated well water at Camp Lejeune.
The bill is named after Janey Ensminger, age 9, daughter of retired Marine Master Sergeant Jerry Ensminger who died from leukemia after exposure to contaminated drinking water at Camp Lejeune.
Camp Lejeune, however, is not the only base where veterans and their dependents were at risk for exposure to environmental hazards.
There are 130 military installations on the National Priority List (EPA Superfund list) and 1,400 military sites contaminated with trichloroethylene (TCE)—a degreaser widely used by the military and industry for many years and a major pollutant in water systems throughout the United States.
According to a Congressional source, it would take from 2 to 4 months to produce a Committee report on the Akaka bill, assuming the SASC does not object. If the jurisdictional issues raises its ugly head, don’t look for a quick passage of legislation.
“Hoosier poet” James Whitcomb Riley is credited with the quote: “When I see a bird that walks like a duck and swims like a duck and quacks like a duck, I call that bird a duck.”
By making DOD the provider of health care and introducing the possibility of SASC objection, the Akaka bill is in danger of being a “dead duck.”
Closer Look at Senator Akaka’s Bill
For Camp Lejeune, eligible individuals would receive health care through DOD’s TRICARE insurance program. The bill gives DOD the authority to compile a list of eligible individuals exposed to environmental hazards at Camp Lejeune. Look for short list. It makes more sense to give this responsibility to a neutral party like the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR).
For other military installations, the bill establishes an Advisory Board with authority to submit a report with a recommendation that DOD should provide compensation or TRICARE health care benefits to veterans and their dependents exposed to environmental hazards. One obvious problem is this gives DOD the discretionary authority to reject Advisory Board’s recommendations. Look for lots of rejections.
Unlike other military installations, Camp Lejeune veterans and dependents are not given the choice of financial compensation or TRICARE health benefits. TRICARE requires eligible individuals to pay insurance premiums. There’s no provision in the bill to waive health insurance premiums.
For Camp Lejeune only, the bill provides a “Sunset” provision, which states that “eligibility for benefits under this section shall terminate on the date that is 5 years after the date of the enactment of the Act.” This assumes that all Lejeune veterans and dependents on the base when the water wells were contaminated have been notified of their eligibility for TRICARE health benefits within 5 years.
The bill establishes an Advisory Board and Science Review Panel with scientists with backgrounds in environmental exposure or environmental exposure assessments, health monitoring or other related fields would be an integral part of the administrative process.
The Advisory Board (except for Camp Lejeune) is responsible for providing expert advice relating to exposures of current and former members of the Armed Forces and their dependents. If there’s no evidence of exposure, the board makes a recommendation of such a finding to VA and DOD. Although no specifically addressed in the bill, the VA would likely use the board’s findings to deny a veteran’s disability claim.
With exception of Camp Lejeune where health care to eligible individuals is mandatory, the Advisory Board only has authority to submit reports with recommendations that DOD should provide compensation or TRICARE health care benefits to veterans and dependents exposed to environmental hazards. These recommendations are very likely to be dismissed by DOD who can readily provide scientific arguments supporting denial of compensation or health care.
There’s no provision in the bill to review the independence of scientists. For example, scientists who are employed by defense contractors or universities with DOD contracts or grants should be excluded from the Advisory Board and Science Review Panel.
Logically, it make sense to have an independent advisory board with access to scientists with environmental exposure backgrounds to evaluate military hazard claims. Without a major change in attitude on the part of DOD, it makes little sense to give DOD discretionary authority to make decisions about compensation or health care benefits.
Over the next several months, we’ll know the outcome of the tug-of-war between the Senate and the House. Stay tuned. In the immortal words of Yogi Berra, “It ain’t over till it’s over.”
[1] vawatchdog.org/09/nf09/nfmay09/nf052809-3.htm
Related Posts:
Short URL: http://www.veteranstoday.com/?p=14862
Posted by Robert O'Dowd on Feb 10 2010, With 0 Reads, Filed under Vet News, Veterans Affairs. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
COMMENTS
To post, we ask that you login using Facebook, Yahoo, AOL, or Hotmail in the box below.Don't have a social network account? Register and Login direct with VT and post.
Before you post, read our Comment Policy - Feedback
Bob, Love your “DUCK” comment. On a serious note, there are major flaws that need to be worked out. In the Akaka Bill having DoD as quote ” THE GATEKEEPER” of healthcare for those that they poisoned is “insane”. They have not in the past made any movements toward correcting their mistakes, so to think that they will do so in the future, is nothing short of living in “OZ”.
That would put DoD in a holier-than-thou postion of deciding who lives and who dies with only one stamp saying “DENIAL”.
Senators Burr’s Bill lacks “bite” it should be “drastically” amended to or re-written.
There are alot of Survivors who have alot at stake here and should not be part of a power struggle between DoD and receiving treatment.
Neither has provisions for an outreach program to notify everyone that was exposed. Clarification of the Akaka Bill “Sunset” can be interpreted in different ways. Vagueness is not our friend.
If the Marine Corps can run advertisements, why can’t they run advertisements/public service announcements, for those they knowingly contaminated, after all they say they “CARE”! Me personally, get your overalls on it’s to late for the boots! The VA system as it stands, is already over-whelmed.
What provisions will be guaranteed to properly staff and treat the future onslaught of known exposed victims?
Will the doctors be trained in recognizing latent illnesses from past exposures? Speaking for myself, I don’t want someone scratching their “watch” and winding their “ass” when it comes to treatment.
As you can see we are aways from getting it “right”. Since it’s taken this long we need to get it “right” the first time.
This past Tues I received a decision from the BVA in my favor regarding patroling in the smoke flume and other stuff in the Gulf. They were careful in how they worded it but stated the RO overlooked pertinent info from my allergist stating that my respiratory problems were directly related to patroling in smoke and insecticides. This decision took six and a half years. I had researched decisions regarding this prior and there were very little positive signs and really did not expect a positive. I share this with any veterans out there that do have respiratory problems to pursue their claim.
To me, personally neither bill cuts it.
Placing control for medical care and benefits in the hands of the DoD, is a grievous and serious mistake at best when it should be the responsibility of the VA and in their control as bad as their system is!
We’ve got some of the best computer technology in the world at our fingertips, so why hasn’t the VA come up with a claims system by which the system would make decisions and when it can’t then dump it into a human intervention stack?
Claims could be processed with far less errors and a heck of a lot faster than any human could.
And when the Marine Corps knew as far back as 1957 of the ground water and physical contamination of TCE/PCE and at least 30-45 other known chemicals did they not stand tall as they say and lay it on the table and be forthright with all?
I grew up a Maine Brat, and this is NOT the Marine Corps my dad love, cherished, honored and sacrificed for during his 26.5 year career! What ever happened to “Duty, Honor & Country?” Did honor get thrown out with the baby’s bath water?
All these studies that go on for years is another ridiculous method used by both the VA and DoD, we’ve seen studies come out and done in 18 months or less but because the report says it like it is, they refute or ignore it so as to avoid paying out billions of dollars in benefits and care!
Is this how we treat all those who wore the uniform, gave those in Congress the luxury of running and remaining in office?
This just goes to show several things, 1) Most people who vote, don’t do their homework and pay attention to those elected as to what they vote on, when they vote or if they vote on any particular issue, especially those concerning veterans! 2) Although we will never see it, would be nice if made mandatory that all those who serve in government should be required to serve at least on tour of duty in the military before being allowed to hold office in Congress!
Then, well maybe then, they would have a better grasp at what is going on in our veterans lives, how illnesses affect them and their families, and just how devastating these illnesses can be. And then maybe they’d not drag their feet and wait so long to provide the necessary benefits and care needed by all!
Frankly if all those who vote, do vote, start voting out all those due for election this year, and lets get some fresh new blood, with new ideas and a whole new perspective on all the issues, and maybe we’ll see change. And if not, come next election vote them out too until we finally get a Congress willing and open to serve those whom elected them!
Jim
Excellent comments and advice!
I’m not even sure requiring someone to have served in The Military would necessarily
always guarantee votes for veterans interests. Look at John McCain, if anyone you would think would be an advocate for veterans it would be him, but it is totally the opposite, he almost always votes against veterans benefits, he was able to marry
into wealth, so I guess he forgot his fellow veterans. To add insult to injury, he tried ever way he could to prevent the last GI Bill from being passed, but once he saw he couldn’t stop it, he tried to take credit for it. It’s like you said, many people don’t know these people’s voting records, they assume because they give loud lip service to our servicemen that they vote for veteran’s programs, but they do the opposite when they pretty much know most veterans aren’t looking.
I’m so worn out dealing with these clowns… with my husband’s claim… Vietnam. And visits to the hospital… having to watch your back…
Watch out America… pretty soon… We’ll ALL be working for the DoD.
go ahead… look in your classified want ads… whose hiring?
National Guard? Used Car Dealers? and sales reps. for the local paper…
that’s it…
Vote the Bloated Deadwood Out.
Start with our own local public servants who are just talk about veterans issues.
Pay attention… what are they doing and not doing for veteran?
There has got to be a veteran’s website where veterans can blog and rate their local public servants on how they and their issues/claims/concerns were handled by their public servant and/or staff and the results that occurred… or did not occur.
Thank you Jim… Give ‘em hell.
Fran
USMC
El Toro
1986-1987