LISTEN VT RADIO | JOIN TEAM VT | SIGN UP DAILY NEWSLETTER
VETERANS TODAY ON : FACEBOOK | TWITTER | VT FORUM
|

Our Commander-in-Chief Needs Our Support

Seal of the President of the United States


Forget your opinion of Barack Obama. Love him or loathe him, the reality remains unchanged: we have but one president at a time. And but one commander-in-chief.

U.S. national security is endangered—perhaps now more than at any time in history. Both the president and our military leaders are bound by an oath to defend this nation from all enemies, both foreign and domestic.

Recent events suggest that, in cooperation with senior military officers, President Obama is battling a cunning and committed adversary. To prevail, he needs public support.

Be clear on this point: we were deceived to wage war in Iraq on fabricated intelligence. Only one nation had the means, motive, opportunity and stable nation state intelligence to succeed with such an operation inside the U.S.

That same state now seeks to induce our invasion of Iran. Or Pakistan. In 1948, the Joint Chiefs of Staff cautioned Harry Truman about the “fanatical concepts” of this extremist enclave, especially its plans for “military and economic hegemony over the entire Middle East.”

President Eisenhower saw this fledgling state in action when, during his 1956 presidential campaign, Britain, France and Israel sought to start a war with Egypt over control of the Suez Canal. London and Paris were quickly persuaded to abandon that effort. Not Tel Aviv.

When this Republican leader sought Congressional support, he found none. The former general turned instead to a televised address to counter an influence that has only grown stronger over the past 52 years. This month, a bipartisan 363 members of Congress committed themselves to an “unbreakable bond” with Israel—regardless of its behavior.

A similar commitment was addressed to the commander-in-chief over the signatures of 76 Senators led by Democrat Barbara Boxer of California. Republican Eric Cantor of Virginia and New York Senator Charles Schumer, a Democrat, unleashed a pro-Israel attack on Obama that sounded less like the Congress than the Knesset.

Forced to face the reality of an enemy within, our military leadership signaled Obama that they are prepared to cover his back. The oath of office mandates a defense against all enemies. Yet it also places our defense under civilian control.

Senior military officers now understand the need to mount a vigorous defense against an enemy adept at waging war “by way of deception.” That’s the operative credo of the Mossad, Israel’s intelligence and foreign operations directorate.

In January, CENTCOM Commander David Petraeus dispatched a team to brief Admiral Mike Mullen on the adverse impact of Israeli behavior on U.S. security interests. As chairman of the Joint Chiefs, Mullen was reportedly stunned.

General Petraeus also argued that CENTCOM should have oversight of Israel/Palestine. It’s long been known how to resolve those hostilities: declare Jerusalem an international city under U.N. protection and dispatch international troops to secure the area.

The Israeli government fired right back. On the early March arrival of Vice-President Joe Biden in Tel Aviv, the Netanyahu government announced the construction of 1,600 homes in the most contentious area in dispute.

When Netanyahu arrived two weeks later for a White House meeting, Obama’s cool reception set off a flurry of pro-Israeli ads in papers nationwide while Nobel peace laureate Elie Wiesel proclaimed, “Jerusalem is above politics.”

Meanwhile Israeli saber rattling moved into high gear as the “existential threat” of Iran again became the drumbeat of the nation’s pro-Israeli mainstream media. The Pentagon fired right backed with an announcement from the Undersecretary of Defense for Policy that U.S. military force against Iran is “off the table in the near term.”

Another adventure in the Middle East would be ruinous for the U.S. not only militarily but also financially and geo-strategically. That may well be what the Israel lobby has in mind as it seeks with its dominance in politics and media to induce another war that would further damage U.S. interests worldwide.

To defend against the manipulation of thought and emotion that typifies modern warfare, the Pentagon is mounting a vigorous counteroffensive. Though non-transparent to the public, its latest initiative was a shot across the bow of this enemy within.

On April 22, the Pentagon rescinded evangelist Franklin Graham’s invitation to a National Prayer Day event. News reports confirmed that his anti-Islam comments were contrary to a newly revised Pentagon policy meant to minimize such provocative rhetoric.

Though that analysis is correct, the underlying dynamics are more complex and far more troublesome for Israel. Those dynamics include its continued status as a legitimate state.

Tel Aviv well recalls a tape-recorded discussion in 1972 between Republican President Richard Nixon and evangelist Billy Graham, Franklin’s father, in which Graham agreed with a commander-in-chief that Jews control the media, calling it a “stranglehold.”

Franklin’s attacks on Islam overcompensated for his father’s agreement on that key strategic point. With this action, the Pentagon signaled confidence in the intelligence identifying a key source of the deception that has long plagued U.S. national security.

By urging that the Congress express its “unbreakable bond” with Israel, the lobby inadvertently conceded good news for America: this perilous bond is already broken.

Please defend the U.S.: support our Commander-in-Chief.

Bookmark and Share

Related Posts:

Short URL: http://www.veteranstoday.com/?p=28353

The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT or any other VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors or partners. Legal Notice

Posted by on Apr 24 2010, With 0 Reads, Filed under Israel, WarZone. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
Get Your Loan Now
Apply for VA Loan Now
Education
Get Your Loan Now
Get Your Loan Now
Get Your Loan Now
Apply for your VA Home Loan Now
Apply for your VA Home Loan Now
Apply for your VA Home Loan Now
Apply for Jobs on HireVeterans.com Now
Apply for Jobs on HireVeterans.com Now
Apply for Jobs on HireVeterans.com Now
body mind baja

COMMENTS

To post, we ask that you login using Facebook, Yahoo, AOL, or Hotmail in the box below.
Don't have a social network account? Register and Login direct with VT and post.
Before you post, read our Comment Policy - Feedback


Comments Closed

70 Comments for “Our Commander-in-Chief Needs Our Support”

  1. “Obviously, before I bring anything to the table, I’m going to pin you down; I’m not going to allow you any semantical wiggle room.”

    First, you don’t “allow” me anything, because you have no control over me whatsoever. If I agree to something that is all it will be, an agreement. You will agree to the same rules you try to impose on me or we won’t be having a chat. Other than that, sure, pin me down, I can defend any statement I make, but it has to be taken in full context. Ron said this to me….”perhaps you will then begin to see how he (Gates) has provided the ability to read behind the scenes, notwithstanding what the controlled media would have us believe.”

    I took that statement to mean that Ron believes the media in its entirety is “controlled”, as in a coordinated effort to control what Americans will hear just like the Chinese control what the citizens of China hear. Whether every news outlet has an owner and is free to control what gets put out is something else entirely. Upon hearing a crack pot comment like that the logical question was what I asked next…”can you document how it is controlled and by who?” If you are now going to point to the irrelevant example that Rupert Murdock owns a number of tv, newspapers, and cable outlets as proof that the media is controlled, or that Jews do well and many media outlets are owned by Jews, my response is going to be a big…so what? What if one man owns a lot of media outlets? What if Jews do well? What would that tell us about control? Not a damn thing. It tells us a lot about capitalism and the free market. People buy Murdock’s papers because he makes the content interesting and accurate, if he didn’t he would be a failure. The First Amendment guarantees Murdock the right to print anything he wants, pro government or anti government at his sole discretion and the public has the sole discretion to refuse to do business with him if they catch him lying like (Full of Hot) Air America. Conservative talk radio is thriving well, because the majority of Americans are center right. Liberal loons have failed, because all they have are a few sound bytes and empty sloganeering, Americans do not want that anti Americn drivel, so they do not support the enterprise. Control has zero to do with it. Credibility is everything. So the question stands. Can you document how the media in its entirety is controlled and by who? Can you eve document how the majority of the media is controlled and by who? Most media outlets are free capital enterprises. Some may have funding for political or ideological dissemination of information, but who cares? Racists even have their own media outlets black and white. There is Storm Front and there is Final Call. What single entity controls both of them? How do they collaborate? The truth is they are not controlled by any central authority or cabal as I said. Media in the US is free and robust. It leans dangerously left, but it is free from governmental control. O how would Watergate have broken just for one glaring example? So sure, if you want to focus on one portion of my statement, be my guest, but understand the context or it will be rejected. I want proof that the government controls what gets printed or that there is a “cabal” as I said that meets and plots what all the media outlets will print, say, or display. Where was the last meeting held? Who showed up? Name a verifiable news item they all decided to keep from us. Barring proof, you owe me an apology for butting into something I said to Ron and trying to make the claim I label a conspiracy theory.

    “explain precisely what a “conspitorial allegation” is, in your view, and please explain how making such a “conspitorial allegation” (unconditionally?) causes one to “lose credibility”.”

    I sometimes string words together that may or may not make sense, again, it is a weakness of mine as an at best semi lucid writer. You did mean conspiratorial, right? An allegation is a claim you have made, or in this instance, a claim Ron made. He claimed the media was controlled. In context he meant it to mean that Gates was somehow in the know and everything else the rest of us mere mortals hear is controlled propaganda, so Gates is providing a service. Uhhh…yeah. The claim that the media is controlled is a conspiracy theory, a childish and ignorant one, but a conspiracy theory. So the words I strung together meant that you lose credibility when you make a claim or an allegation as a fact, based on an unfounded urban myth or conspiracy theory. Did that clear it up, or are you still confused.

    Don’t make me dissect Chomsky again. I won’t be happy if you quote an intricate lie builder as proof that the media is controlled. A meeting time, an agenda, a comprehensive attendance record that covers all outlets, a court decision limiting First Amendment rights, a well researched neutral study by someone competent, something not posted on Storm Front or Illuminati News or Jew Watch preferably. I won’t accept someone else’s opinion as a fact. A fact is something that can be verified by an original source. Quoting some figure stating we Jews control the media needs to have a time and verifiable record where I can read the entire context of the statement, etc…Let’s leave no room to wiggle out of it. Sure.

  2. How come you won’t let me respond to LeFavour?

    • If you want to take it off site, name the place, tough guy.

      • What would be the point, tough guy?

        Your statements are beyond outrageous – they’re completely self-refuting, and they reflect a world view that simply has no basis whatsoever in reality.

        Obviously, nothing that anyone here says is going to convince you of anything.

        I actually almost feel sorry for you in a way. At some level, in some sense, part of you realizes that you’re living a lie, but you refuse to give in. Unlike the rest of us, you refuse to accept that you’ve been duped; instead you fight on, having erected a barrier…facts and solid reasoning simply bounce off you like bullets bounce off Superman.

        Thus as “our” government waxes worse and worse, the more atrocities it commits, the more lies it tells, the more obvious the evil, the more fanatical you must become in defense of it.

        You called me a “coward” for using a pseudonym. Well, in this age of limitless government treachery, using a pseudonym reflects prudence, not cowardice. What’s cowardly is your inability to look in the mirror.

        • “What would be the point, tough guy?”

          You have something to say to me, so I offered you a way to be heard without interference from a moderator. Speak your mind. I wouldn’t want you to feel at a disadvantage. Choose the ground and I will come for you if you want a piece of me. For my part, I am curious how the entity known as Nelson became a dweller in the dark and I am disappointed at the sudden change of heart. Maybe you are somebody with an image and ego to defend here so you don’t feel up to investing the effort elsewhere, but to me you are nothing more than a source of mild amusement. Of course, if I held your ignorant views I wouldn’t want to face me either.

          “Your statements are beyond outrageous – they’re completely self-refuting, and they reflect a world view that simply has no basis whatsoever in reality.”

          Can you be more specific than, awww yer dumb, you don’t know what yer talkin about, yer blind, blah blah blah….yup, I’m smart, I’m with the cool crowd, I know things and you don’t. I can back up any statement I have made. What would you like to understand? Dead civilians in Iraq? Israel not being our enemy? If you can’t focus on anything I have said, you look petty waving your arms around and generalizing.

          “Obviously, nothing that anyone here says is going to convince you of anything.”

          I wouldn’t necessarily say that. You have convinced me that you are an idiot. Am I going to take anyone’s word for it? Am I going to be led by the nose with one inference or best guess after another like a bull to the slaughterhouse without putting up a fight? No. I need verifiable fact supporting any analysis, because unlike you Nelson I haven’t drawn a conclusion and gravitated towards some asshole with a diploma that says what you want to hear. Israel hatred is a lucrative business, Nelson.

          “I actually almost feel sorry for you in a way. At some level, in some sense, part of you realizes that you’re living a lie, but you refuse to give in. Unlike the rest of us, you refuse to accept that you’ve been duped; instead you fight on, having erected a barrier…facts and solid reasoning simply bounce off you like bullets bounce off Superman.”

          You are projecting. If you don’t know what that means, look it up. There are no solid facts presented here. Not a single printed line can stand up to scrutiny from stating that U.S. national security is endangered and then insinuating that Israel is the source of the danger to the childish delusion that declaring Jerusalem an international city will “resolve those hostilities” when the root of the hostility was codified in a religious text written 1400 years ago. Jerusalem has no value to Islam at all, if it did it would have been mentioned at least once in the Quran, it is not. Not once.

          “Thus as “our” government waxes worse and worse, the more atrocities it commits, the more lies it tells, the more obvious the evil, the more fanatical you must become in defense of it.”

          What atrocity is our government committing, Nelson? Besides turning on our good friends Israel. I thought your ilk would be happy with that?

          You called me a “coward” for using a pseudonym. Well, in this age of limitless government treachery, using a pseudonym reflects prudence, not cowardice. What’s cowardly is your inability to look in the mirror.

          Do you honestly believe you can’t be found by the traces you leave on the web? Or that an insignificant fool like you warrants scrutiny? I admit you sound like a neo-Nazi or Klan member and are definitely schizophrenic, but if Gates can man up and use his real name and photo don’t you think one of the parasites clinging to his ass should be safe too? I speculate the real reason is much more likely that you are ashamed of your words and your Jew hatred. You understand that civil society shuns lepers like you and you dare not reveal who you are in case your boss, or your clients, or your customers, or your family, or whoever finds out what a rotten piece of detritus you are. If you are not engaged in anything illegal stand up and be counted, real vets gave and maintain that right for you. Put your ass on the line like the rest of us that dwell on the sunny side of the rock, Nelson, there is a lot to be seen up here.

          The offer stands to debate anywhere of your choosing. I might be able to help you out of the darkness if you give me a chance.

          • Yo shit for brains, practically everything you said above is just plain stupid and/or just a simple, obvious falsehood.

            Here’s one particularly stupid – make that laughably absurd – thing you said above. You said:

            “As far as the loony statement that the media is controlled, can you document how it is controlled and by who? You lose credibility when you make conspiratorial allegations. This is not China or Gaza, we have a robust press and it is foolish to think that the heads of the major media outlets gather in some kind of cabal to plot what Americans will hear.”

            You make a ridiculous statement like that, then you expect to be taken seriously? Anyone not living in a closet knows that “our” media is being used against us.

            I’ll tell you what, I’ll give you an indisputable example of how “our” media is being used against us, an incident that was obviously planned by, now get this, CONSPIRATORS – yes that’s right, CONSPIRATORS, and then I want you to retract what you said and publicly admit that you were wrong.

            If you’ll publicly admit that you were wrong, then I’ll invest the time and refute your other statements about Iraq as well.

            You see, I’m not going to waste time arguing with an idiot who’s just being contrary.

            And as far as my pseudonym goes, I didn’t mean to imply that using a pseudonym gives me perfect anonymity. That’s not the point. For that matter you could ask, why lock your car door when a thief could break the window? Why encrypt your hard drive when there’s “atomic force microscopy”, etc.? You use the level of protection that you feel is commensurate with the situation.

        • BTW I tried to have a civil conversation with you, but you started calling me names, e.g., “idiot”.

          • Look sir or madam, you predetermined the tone of my response with your opening salvo aimed my way. It would be a bit tough to give you a break at this point after you picked a fight with me, but I am perfectly comfortable being civil. That said, I do not desire to be civil to anyone that I am convinced is lying. Gates would fall into that category. I am quick to apologize if I am wrong, but nothing I have seen browsing over his site tells me I am. You on the other hand, seem to be simply ignorant. And that is not an insult. If you don’t know, you just don’t know. There is no shame in being ignorant on a particular subject until you have been informed reasonably well or start refusing to answer pointed questions, because the answers shatter some truism you thought was sacrosanct. Even if you were civil up until I see that sort of pattern I would hold no reservations in ridiculing you to no end. Is that the sort of person you are, Mr or Ms Nelson?

            So let’s get to details….

            You stated….”Here’s one particularly stupid – make that laughably absurd – thing you said above. You said:

            “As far as the loony statement that the media is controlled, can you document how it is controlled and by who? You lose credibility when you make conspiratorial allegations. This is not China or Gaza, we have a robust press and it is foolish to think that the heads of the major media outlets gather in some kind of cabal to plot what Americans will hear.”

            You make a ridiculous statement like that, then you expect to be taken seriously? Anyone not living in a closet knows that “our” media is being used against us.”

            Normally when you are going to dispute something you will provide supporting evidence. My statement had a question…can you document how it (the media) is controlled and by who? The key word would be “document”. Can you point to an expose of some sort by a credible investigator that “documents” media control in the US? You seem to making a challenge here, with out of place ridicule, apparently, but have forgotten to bring ammunition for your rifle. I would like to read the “source” that convinced you that the media is controlled for myself. Scuttlebutt and school or the office is not a source. Why does MSNBC shill for the Democratic party and all the goofy liberal causes and FOX news supports American conservative values? The message is diametrically opposed. Rush Limbaugh does not carry the same message that Al Franken had. No issue is cast in the same light from global warming to Katrina to the war on terror. I’m sorry, sir or madam, to think that the US media is controlled is a product of paranoia run amok.

            Now, we know for “fact” that China censors and filters the Internet. They limit search capabilities for democracy for example and we know they do it because craven cowards like Google allowed filtering software to be used from search requests from China. According to Amnesty International, China “has the largest recorded number of imprisoned journalists and cyber-dissidents in the world.” China blocks net content and monitors net use. That is control of the media. There is no case that I am aware of in the US, and we have courts to hear these sorts of challenges, of the US government controlling what can and can’t be seen outside of child pornography and the like. If you have “evidence” bring it next time you come around shouting at me.

            “I’ll tell you what, I’ll give you an indisputable example of how “our” media is being used against us, an incident that was obviously planned by, now get this, CONSPIRATORS – yes that’s right, CONSPIRATORS, and then I want you to retract what you said and publicly admit that you were wrong.”

            I am prepared to retract ANY statement I have made and apologize if you do bring “indisputable examples” of media control. An example of how the media is used against us is not what I challenged. There is no doubt that Obama is attacking America through information warfare through willing outlets. That is a far cry from having “control” over the media. If you can document how the US media is controlled then I will publicly admit I am wrong, and since I am using my real name it will mean a whole lot more than if you did the same, Mr or Ms Nelson…and yes, a pseudonym allows you to say and be reckless with your words, so it is cowardice when you spout shit that the rest of us know is wrong.

          • Obviously, before I bring anything to the table, I’m going to pin you down; I’m not going to allow you any semantical wiggle room.

            Once again, you said in part:

            “You lose credibility when you make conspiratorial allegations. This is not China or Gaza, we have a robust press and it is foolish to think that the heads of the major media outlets gather in some kind of cabal to plot what Americans will hear.”

            First, please explain precisely what a “conspitorial allegation” is, in your view, and please explain how making such a “conspitorial allegation” (unconditionally?) causes one to “lose credibility”.

            Second, let’s focus on what I see as the operative part of that statement: “[I]t is foolish to think that the heads of the major media outlets gather in some kind of cabal to plot what Americans will hear.”

            Can we take that statement of yours at face value?

  3. Surely you jest. Obama has sworn to uphold the Constitution. He is Bush on steroids. Being a Kenyan, a war criminal guilty of treason he should be under the jail next to Bush and Cheney(not to mention Turd Blossom). He is a Marxist and a fraud

  4. Regarding Iran, isn’t it time we make a gesture of recconsiliation? We were involved in the overthrow of their democratically elected leader in 1953 and we supported Iraq’s war against Iran in the 1980′s including giving chemical weapons to Saddam.
    What if we took an entirely different approach. Why not invite the president of Iran to the white house for a state visit. The president could discuss relations, nuclear power and trade opportunities. Iran is currently banned from purchasing airplanes and other high technology items made by the US. What if we offered these things to them in trade for their abundant natural gas. We have refining expertise along with nuclear, computers and aviation. They have the money and we have the stuff. They have the fuels that could give us stable energy for the future.
    Friendship and trade cooperation sounds a lot more fruitfull to me than the ‘On the table’ crap we hear so much of. This would benifit AMERICA! If some other little country doesn’t like it then too bad.
    Ian

  5. One day Americans will completely wake up to the real intents of Israel. On that day, companies possibly named ‘American Urban Moving Systems’ will begin to locate to Israel. Americans will be like a woodrat going after a tasty piece of vegetation. It ain’t pretty.

  6. This is just the sort of reaction that those chronicled in these accounts relish in provoking. Those being profiled specialize in catalyzing hate and in pitting two sides against the other while they profit off the misery of both. Your comment is just the sort of response that would make an agent provocateur smile. You cannot defeat hate with hate any more than you can fight fire with fire. The only way to combat the treason detailed in these analyses is with facts and accountability under the rule of law. And to combine facts and accountability with the design required to combat these deeply imbedded systemic dysfunctions. Obama is not the problem. Nor was Bush (I or II), Clinton, Reagan, Carter, Nixon, Johnson, Kennedy, Eisenhower or Truman. To grasp “how” this treason operates in plain sight, please read Guilt By Association and the topical analyses posted here and on the Criminal State website. Anyone not outraged is misinformed. Yet to direct that outrage toward Barack Obama is well wide of the mark.

  7. BE ADVISED that your statement “He needs to be HANGED, and I do mean that. Hanged” can be construed as a direct threat to the President of the USA. While I do NOT make that judgment, please be advised that our site is monitored very closely by the FBI and Secret Service. Threats to any US leader whether Republican, Democrat or Indepenent has no place on our site and is a violation of TOS and US Law. Signed John P. Allen, General Manager of Veterans Today

  8. God bless you, Jeff Gates, as a trus American and patriot. This dispute has made clear one thing: who in high places supports their country, President, and Commander-in-Chief, and who is the agent of an implacable and inimical foreign power. I hope none of you will forget the name of the country that perpetrated this act of infamy, and the names of the traitors that took part.

    • Thanks for your comment. This enemy within can be defeated provided people stick closely to the facts. This is not a “people” doing this but an extremist few within the few who could care less about the broader Jewish community who were induced to identify their interests with those of an enclave who manipulated their share faith tradition to their detriment.

      Anyone who thinks this is somehow “the Jews” is missing the point entirely. The real enemy is far more subtle and, frankly, far more sinister. That’s Guilt By Association includes (at p. 21) a clinical description of the mental state of those chronicled in this first release in the Criminal State series.

      Note the five descriptors below for a behavioral template meant to distinguish those complicit from those of the Jewish faith who are as appalled by this behavior as anyone familiar with the real facts—vs. what we’ve been deceived to believe:

      psychopathy n. A mental disorder roughly equivalent to antisocial personality disorder, but with emphasis on affective and interpersonal traits such as superficial charm, pathological lying, egocentricity, lack of remorse, and callousness that have traditionally been regarded by clinicians as characteristic of psychopaths, rather than social deviance traits such as need for stimulation, parasitic lifestyle, poor behavioral controls, impulsivity, and irresponsibility that are prototypical of antisocial personality disorder. Whether psychopathy and antisocial personality disorder share a common referent is an open question.

  9. Has he shown our Nation and its citizens respect. You reap what you sow.

  10. Gates, you should stick to advising finance because as a military/geo-political analyst you are an idiot. Israel is not the enemy of this country, morons undermining our values and passing misinformation are. The unbreakable bond that frightens you is the American people recognizing that Israel is just like us, Israel shares all of our values, and Israel is an ally worth defending. The poser you shill for does not like America We have the greatest nation in human history and he wants to “change” that.

    I am a Marine vet and I am ashamed that a vet wrote this modern version of the Protocols. What sort of web site is this? Shame on you. The US is the only nation that can prevent another Holocaust against the Jewish people, a nuclear holocaust. Of course Israel is begging for help. You see something sinister in Jews wanting to stay alive in the face of threats of genocide by an apocalyptic group of religious fanatics. If not Jew hatred didn’t motivate you to publish this ignorant tripe, then what did?

    • ROTFLMAO! Good troll! Thanks for the comic relief!

      • “ROTFLMAO! Good troll! Thanks for the comic relief!”

        More like maniacal cackling from the shadows, where cowards skulk around like sneak thieves, ashamed and afraid to unfurl their devices.

        “..if Obama actually wanted to fight our real enemy, Israel…”

        Gee, Nelson. What led you to goose step over to this ignorant view point?

        • Thanks Michael for taking the time to post a comment. Hope you’ll visit the Criminal State website and peruse the facts and analyses posted there. Should you find any statement unsupported by confirmed facts, kindly let me know. Appreciate your interest.

          • I will pick up that gauntlet if I have time. I am just an average American, but what sets me apart from my countrymen is that I care enough to be informed and I enjoy filling in the “facts” that ideologues leave out of their “analysis”.

        • Nelson_2009 wrote: “ROTFLMAO! Good troll! Thanks for the comic relief!”

          Michael LeFavour wrote: “More like maniacal cackling from the shadows, where cowards skulk around like sneak thieves, ashamed and afraid to unfurl their devices.”

          Ok, you’ve convinced me. I can’t argue with that…it really does describe your hapless drivel. (BTW, where did you copy that sentence from?)

          Nelson_2008 wrote:“..if Obama actually wanted to fight our real enemy, Israel…”

          Michael LeFavour wrote: “Gee, Nelson. What led you to goose step over to this ignorant view point?”

          My functioning brain led me to it…sorry, it’s clearly not something a brain-dead imbecile such as yourself is capable of understanding.

          • The coward hiding behind the nickname Nelson_2008 sometimes or Nelson_2009 when his schizophrenia bleeds into what he passes as a comment asked about something I wrote about him: “BTW, where did you copy that sentence from?’

            Why I read it on your mother’s ass as I was giving her a little something, something, kid.

            When asked to support just one crock full of shit platitude that Nelson the Nazi has about Israel being our enemy the best response he could fart was: “My functioning brain led me to it…sorry, it’s clearly not something a brain-dead imbecile such as yourself is capable of understanding.”

            Two thoughts, first, Erwin Rommel was a brilliant tactician, he was also a Nazi. Being a malevolent piece of shit doesn’t mean you are necessarily stupid, Nelson. But since you are incapable of defending your ignorant premise with anything other than a distinctly boring ad hominem, I think you will have to wear the dunce hat, Herr Nelson. Don’t worry about the way you look though, it won’t clash with the Totenkopf you are fond of accessorizing with.

    • Thanks for your post. What motivates me is the facts and the need for a form of national security that makes transparent an enemy within that routinely displace facts with what “the mark” (us) can be deceived to believe, as with the intelligence fixed around a predetermined goal (the invasion of Iraq) that served not our interests but those of a foreign nation. I urge that you read the posts and note the key distinction between the broad category of “Jews” and the very narrow description of those elites/extremists chronicled in these accounts. Also urge that you read Guilt By Association for an explanation of the “how” of this ongoing psy-ops. Once you grasp the HOW, the who and why will become transparent. You’ll find an introduction posted on the Criminal State website (on the book order page) along with a sample chapter chronicling key aspects of John McCain and Lyndon Johnson of which most Americans are unaware.

      It’s not easy dealing with these disturbing facts. The real enemy is those who refuse to do so. In a nation dependent for our freedom on informed consent, this trans-generational criminal syndicate has imbedded its duplicitous operations in those domains between us and the facts we require. Read through a dozen or so analyses (particularly those starting with “how”) and I am confident you will find that we’re on the same page in ensuring that we are governed not with undisclosed bias and misinformation but unadorned facts. Therein lies the essential foundation to protect the rule of law.

      This enemy within cannot be defeated with hate any more than you can fight fire with fire. What’s required is facts, accountability (under law) and a better design. As you become familiar with the real facts, I am confident you will join those of us insistent on accountability — keeping in mind that these facts confirm ongoing treason, a capital crime.

      Again, thanks for taking the time to write. Much appreciate it.

      • “as with the intelligence fixed around a predetermined goal (the invasion of Iraq) that served not our interests but those of a foreign nation.”

        Here is where you can start supporting your statements. How did removing a murderous tyrant not serve our interests? How was it not in our interests to “attempt” to give the Iraqi people something they had never had in their entire history, something they were powerless to attain for themselves…a chance to control their own destiny by a free will vote (freedom)? Democracies rarely attack Democracies, how is it not in our interest to spread Democracy, even at the end of a bayonet as we did with Japan and Germany? So what, another country benefited? What does that tell us? Nothing unless you are a schizophrenic anti-Semite. The whole world benefited. Are you sure it wasn’t a wider conspiracy? The Soviets and the intelligence agencies of all or allies delivered the same conclusions. That hardly shows singular malice on the part of the Jews.

        From what I see so far, the “mark” is you, Gates. From your lame attempt to stump for the Democratic party to your ignorance of the role of Islam at the root of the violence directed against America, and the rest of the world for that matter, where coincidentally enough, our good friend Israel has “held the line” for decades…alone.

        I can’t comment on the rest of what you wrote, because it deals with something you have written that I have not seen. As far as any state wanting us to invade Iran, I support that whole heartedly. The Shia Muslims will not be contained by MAD. Rather, they seek martyrdom and the Apocalypse. A weapon that can destroy the world must not fall into the hands of those with the belief that using it will usher in paradise on earth.

        • Michael LeFavour wrote: “How did removing a murderous tyrant not serve our interests?”

          So, in other words, if someone in some other country decided that the murderous U.S. government needed to be overthrown, and they attacked and invaded the U.S., you’d support the invaders?

          Who made “us” (or YOU) judge, jury and executioner? How is it that Bush and you get to decide that getting rid of Saddam Hussein is worth the lives of a million Iraqis? Who appointed Bush and Obama and YOU as the ultimate arbiters of human life?

          BTW, how come there were no “suicide bombers” in Iraq when Saddam was in power?

          Lastly, your nonsensical statements about “spreading democracy” show that you really know nothing about U.S. history, foreign policy and current events than what you see on Fox “News”.

          It’s really not worth even debating the subject with you.

          • Unlike you Nelson, I answer questions if I have the time. Sometimes the answers are even lucid enough to be understood, too. That is my weakness as a writer and I accept it. I prefer face to face Q and A to cut down on the pasting of other people’s words certain experts on every subject, computer geeks often do.

            I asked Gates to explain what to an average everyday American is a legitimate question: “How did removing a murderous tyrant not serve our interests?”

            Instead of waiting for Gates to come up with a rational response, instead of trying to answer the question with a legitimate response, Nelson the dumb ass needs to know, “So, in other words, if someone in some other country decided that the murderous U.S. government needed to be overthrown, and they attacked and invaded the U.S., you’d support the invaders?

            If the US government was led by a perverse dictator with all the murderous qualities of Saddam Hussein, if the citizens of our country were disarmed and terrorized by his secret police, if our citizens were routinely tortured, raped, and executed without trials, if we were powerless to rid ourselves of this monster and had never tasted a day of freedom in our lives, yeah, I would hope that some other nation would take pity on us and do the right thing. Obviously you are either incapable of empathy for a powerless people, you do not think things through when you open your fat mouth, or you are asking a fool’s question by framing the invasion of the leading beacon of decency, human rights, and personal liberty as being equal to invading a totalitarian nightmare and grotesque example of human conduct. Which is it, smart boy?

            “Who made “us” (or YOU) judge, jury and executioner?”

            The UN had over a dozen Chapter VII resolutions authorizing the use of force to put an end to Saddam’s deprivations. You do know what the relevance of Chapter VII is? Go ahead and look it up, kid, you can pretend you knew after you learn something.

            “How is it that Bush and you get to decide that getting rid of Saddam Hussein is worth the lives of a million Iraqis?”

            First, only the worst sort of America hating dupe would accept the figure of a “million lives”, let alone that American forces caused that number of deaths. Two separate issues. Second, you don’t get to sound like you know something long after the fact. Show me any piece of evidence that corroborates your ignorant assertion that President Bush was willing to see a million Iraqis dead to get Saddam.

            “Who appointed Bush and Obama and YOU as the ultimate arbiters of human life?”

            Over half the nation, myself one of them…proudly, placed President Bush in charge of the leading light of the free world. Not sure what happened with the poser we have now that refuses to reveal his true status as an eligible candidate. More to the point, sometimes the position requires life and death decisions in case you didn’t understand that, kid. If you had to speculate, how do you suppose all the victims of the rape rooms and torture chambers we set free would feel if you were in charge of foreign policy?

            “BTW, how come there were no “suicide bombers” in Iraq when Saddam was in power?”

            They were busy murdering infidels in places like Israel, Chechnya, and Afghanistan. Are you suggesting that the US created suicide bombers? Or are you admitting that the majority of the dead civilians in Iraq are due to Sunni and Shia religious strife?

            “Lastly, your nonsensical statements about “spreading democracy” show that you really know nothing about U.S. history, foreign policy and current events than what you see on Fox “News”.”

            So Germany and Japan just spontaneously broke out into democracy, huh? US foreign policy had nothing to do with spreading a functioning democracy in those places, right Wizard?

            “It’s really not worth even debating the subject with you.”

            If I held your views, I wouldn’t want a piece of me either.

        • Michael, of all the comments so far that I have read on this site, you seem to express the most anger and hatred and statements unsupported by rational arguments…the US supported Saddam for years when it was convenient to do so and then turned on him when it was again convenient after we led him via April Gillaspi (sp?) to believe that his dispute with Kuwait was betwen the two of them….does that make it right? And how is Mr. Gates stumping for the Democratic Party? Have you read his book? He raises as much concern about that party as he does the Republican Party. I urge that you read his book and op-eds with an open mind…perhaps you will then begin to see how he has provided the ability to read behind the scenes, notwithstanding what the controlled media would have us believe.

          • I urge that you read his book and op-eds with an open mind…perhaps you will then begin to see how he has provided the ability to read behind the scenes, notwithstanding what the controlled media would have us believe.

            Ron, at least I am good at something. How should I react to Gate’s bigotry? Demonization of a people has been documented as a precursor to genocide and in my opinion the Jews have suffered enough violence at the hands of the rest of us. This load of unfounded BS is hateful and even, yes, evil. Make no mistake, Israel and Zionism are the modern embodiment of the Jewish people. Singling Israel out or holding that nation to an impossible standard is anti-Semitism.

            Almost 30% of the hostile resolutions coming from the UN are against Israel. You don’t think there has been enough hatred of those 5 million Jews…at the same time slavery, SLAVERY just became illegal a few years ago in parts of the Muslim world? Do you feel those 5 million Israeli Jews are the cause of 30% of the world’s problems? I ask you to keep perspective. What Gates is doing is not only wrong, it is immoral.

            You ask a confusing question. You want to know if it was right to support Saddam against Iran? Or are you suggesting we supported Saddam against Kuwait? The answer to the first is yes it was right at the time to support Saddam against Iran. That does not mean we agree with Saddam or share any values with Saddam, it means that the decision was made that the alternative would have been worse not to support Saddam. I would cut my dog loose on you in a minute if you gave me a reason to do so, but that does not mean he sleeps on my bed.

            Gates is stumping for the democratic party by calling for support of the worst leader in American history regardless of his criminal conduct and mockery of our great nation. No, I have not read his book and it is not high on my to do list. I do have an open mind though, regardless of the opinion you may have formed of me with a hand full of postings. “We were deceived to wage war in Iraq on fabricated intelligence”, comes straight out of the Democratic play book. Telling the truth about Islam is “provocative rhetoric”, another Democratic calling card. Maybe I am reading too much into it, maybe it is pure Jew hatred and Gates wants us all to rally around a Manchurian candidate as he throws the Jewish nation under the bus to grovel at the feet of our real enemies. A sacrificial offering the good hearted American people are not willing to make. Where Gates sees a sinister lobby, an enemy within, I see common sense and shared values.

            As far as the loony statement that the media is controlled, can you document how it is controlled and by who? You lose credibility when you make conspiratorial allegations. This is not China or Gaza, we have a robust press and it is foolish to think that the heads of the major media outlets gather in some kind of cabal to plot what Americans will hear. You want to talk facts? Bring some to the table or shove off.

          • I wanted to add something, Ron. For the most part I treat people how they treat me except where I am convinced they are lying. Gates is too intelligent and the deception he has fabricated to support the conclusion he has reached is too elaborate for him to play innocent, so he is open to the scorn and ridicule his ilk deserve. Nelson, on the other hand, determined the tone of my response by taking a swing at me for addressing his hero Gates. A good lackey perhaps, defending master? I am just a normal American. If you can’t get your stupid ideas past me you have a snow ball’s chance in Hell of getting the support of someone smarter and sharper. Just don’t think for a minute that I am the sort to just lie there and take abuse. I like fighting and I like to think I can fight pretty well, where I throw my punches depends on where you throw yours. We can disagree politely or we can sling shit, I’m fine with either. I’ll be waiting for you to respond to everything I said with one of these (?) at the end of it.

  11. Until the charge of “anti-Semitism” is exposed for the rhetorical ad hominem red herring it almost always is, there will be little progress in the debate over Israel’s undue influence over this nation. Here’s a short quote from Sam Francis on the subject written in ’04, which may be of interest.

    “But, of course, as with many others who have discussed (or tried to discuss or even to mention) the question of Jewish influence frankly–Pat Buchannan, Joe Sobran, Congressmen Paul Findley or James Moran, and more recently Gen. Anthony Zinni, Senator Ernst Hollings, or Ralph Nader–any effort to argue against the charge is fruitless. The accusation of “anti-Semitism,” much like those of “racism,” “xenophobia,” “sexism,” “homophobia,” etc., is essentially a power trip, an effort to avoid and destroy discussion of substantive issues and deflect it onto an ad hominem level that is impossible to deny or defend against. How do you “prove” you’re not whatever bad name you have just been called? Any denial or defense is at once met with the charge that it “just doesn’t go far enough.” Of course not; it never does and never can. That’s why the charge is so powerful and dangerous, and those who hurl it are well aware of that. But in terms of their merits, these kinds of accusations don’t even count. Invocations of such “isms” and “phobias” are invariably signs that those who hurl them have little of substance to say….”

    Hurling the charge of “anti-Semitism” and the others mentioned is part and parcel of the attempt by certain interests to pathologize and criminalize dissent from their self-interested agenda. Yet, in the absence of independent, corroborating proof that the accused is a racist, etc., the charge rather proves the opposite, that the accuser is himself, in fact, the real racist for the simple fact that he would criminalize or pathologize anything that offends his sensibilities while denying that right to the accused. For the accuser to thereupon resort to dispensation based on historical facts, in this country of all places, is an egregious slander on our nation itself.

    The power of this ruse is so great that even the comments above broke down immediately into hurling ad hominem accusations with the predictable effect of neutralizing rational discussion of substantive issues on which the future of our nation depends.

    • I may be an optimist but I believe the “power of this ruse” is not so great anymore.

      The charge evokes yawns as it has been so unjustly employed so often, as you point out.

      An unfortunate reality is that anti-Semitism does still exist in America — mostly housed in the religious right — but the outrage that ought be elicted is dying, not the least because of the militarists who make common cause with Christian Zionists who believe Jews will end up left behind, in hell, rivers of bloood, pick your absurdity.

      As for Israeli militarism, it bears little resemblance to the moral principles of Judaism.

      • Thanks for your post. Anti-Semitism exists among those ignorant of the facts. The facts confirm that those complicit are skilled at the manipulation of thought and emotion, including the abuse and misuse of the faith traditions. That is hardly unique to any one faith.

    • Considering that over 90% of the world’s Jews are Ashkenazi a turko-finnish indo-european ethnic group and not semites(Arabs are semites) it would seem that the most virulent anti-semites on the planet are the Ashkenazi Zionist Jews. By the way male Ashkenazis are in the same exact genetic Y haplogroup as male Pushtans.

  12. Mostly a really good post, Jeff. Thoughtful and logical. I don’t love Obama (I never voted for him) and I don’t loathe him. I ignore him. He is a perfect reflection of the broad swath of young, brainless Americans (like I was when I voted for JFK) who can’t think for themselves, who are ruled below their belt buckles, who believe the Israel-controlled American media, and who now can count Obama’s phoney “change” in the few pennies left in their pockets for the rest of their lives.

    Cheers, Tom Texas Veteran

    • Thanks Tom for the post. Urge that you search for “How Israel Wages War in Plain Sight” for a description of an “asset” — also posted on Criminal State site on the book order page under “Introduction.”

  13. Mel Rockefeller

    Jim the bond is broken where it counts – behind the scenes. Congresses vote on sanctions evidences the threat the Israeli Lobby poses to our National Security Interests. When you repeatedly hear “unbreakable bond” the relationship is smashed to smithereens. It is only a matter of time until we see publicly what our NSA now is dealing with – the systemic treason imposed on our nation under the cover of Special Friendship.

    • Thanks Mel for your explanation.I apologise to Jeff Gates for referring to him as Gordon.It is a real mess and I feel that something really serious is about to happen.

  14. To state as Rev Graham did that the Jews control the media is not antisemetism-it is simply a statement of fact!

    • It’s actually more interesting and far more disturbing. it’s not that Jews control the media, it’s that an undisclosed bias poses as news and much of what we digest as facts is instead a subtle form of propaganda brought to us by those with an undisclosed bias. Not all of those involved are jewish; many are Christian-Zionists. Others are simply “assets” who are paid to read scripts. If we mean to protect our freedom and restore the rule of law, we must make this form of treason transparent. In the Information Age, if the displacement of facts with false beliefs is not treason, then what is? Our freedom is dependent on informed choice. Those who undermine that process are traitors to the most fundamental notion of a fact-based form of governance meant by the founders to displace those who would have us governed by faith rather than reason. We meant to rid ourselves of that peril; instead, it’s deeply imbedded not only in media but also in politics, pop culture, think tanks and, perhaps more perilous of all — in education. It’s not yet clear that this systemic form of criminality can be solved due in large part to the dominance of Zionists in mainstream media. Thanks for your interest.

  15. Thanks for pointing out Billy Graham’s anti-Semitism during the Nixon years.

    That the younger Graham ostensibly now aims his venom at Islam shows well the Hofferesque character of the religious bigot: Mindless, and jumping from group to group, hatred to hatred.

    The malice of and bigotry emitting from this region are despicable, common to militarists and true believers.

    Enough of it. Israel is no friend of America’s.

    But the various Arab and Persian dictators should find no solace in this real-politic relationship; they love liberty-denying oppressors as much as any other state despot.

    • Mike: “shows well the Hofferesque character of the religious bigot: Mindless, and jumping from group to group, hatred to hatred.”

      Your so-called “religious bigots” INCLUDES those who are into the RELIGION of ULTRA LEFTIST LIBERALISM.

      Read many of the posts on this VT Blog from week to week. They fit perfectly into the: mindless, jumping on group to group, and hatred to hatred. It’s like very few of you guys have any moral compass whatsoever.

      It doesn’t matter whether I like you guys personally or not (most I do) and respect your service to our country (most I do)… but … let me end with a simple example. Mr? Nelson_2008 called me what he believes is a hateful name a week or so ago. He called me ShitStein, implying of course, that I was a nasty Jew from Israel in his vision of the world. Now I know Mumble_2008 occasionally demonstrates he has a brain buried somewhere in his thick skull. Afterall, he thinks he can cleverly disguise who he is. But he knows nothing about me, and I could care less if he ever does. He’s a kooky creep. BUT, he perfectly demonstrates mindlessness, jumping on nefarious groups and embellished with a deep-seated hatred. Welcome to Kal’s world.

      Tom Texas Vet First Cav

      • Compass is liberty.

        That Israel engages in oppression.

        That, for example, the Catholic Church engages in oppression.

        That American foreign policy enganges in oppression … in no way disconfirms the facts. Though this is what you are arguing.

        The committment to liberty does not change, unfortunately there are many who fight this committment.

        As for this idiot who threw an imprecation at you, he is a fool, as you describe.

        • Coming from a moron like you, I’ll take that as a compliment. Thanks.

          • Nelson,would you please refrain from calling people fools and morons.

            This makes us no better than the foe we seek to defeat.Unless we treat all humans as beings of worth,the battle is lost before it has begun.

          • Ross, it’s always Dillman who starts with the ad hominem, not me.

        • Portraying us (the U.S.) as the “American Empire” seeking to dominate appears to be a means used to discredit us while those manipulating policy (and making it appear as “ours”) profit at our expense in both blood and treasure.

      • Sorry chump, but I call it as I see it. As for the “kooky creep” stuff, well, Goober you should be looking at your monitor, not your mirror, as you type your childish drivel.

        • In your case Nelson,the battle is lost because you are consumed with hate and insecurity.The enemy is within our own human genetics.Your hate has destroyed all reason and this makes you like your perceived foe.You have fallen for their trap,like generations before who fought two world wars in the name of freedom.

          It is the money manipulators at the apex of the banking system who create wars for profit.

          You perceive insight as being an innate weakness,or some negative force that attacks your bravado.It is time for you Nelson to realise the potential of your intellect.You disappoint me and shame yourself.

          • Frankly I don’t give a damn what you think. My country is being destroyed right before my eyes, by Jewish supremacists and their apologists and enablers…of course I’m going to “hate”.

            Anybody that can understand what’s happenong here and not have some degree of “hatred” for the aggressors and their apologists and enablers has a serious character flaw, IMO. Sorry if some of it offends your gentle sensibilities.

            As far as “hate” goes here’s an interesting quote for you to try to understand:

            Hate had been, popularly, reduced to an aberration within the human psyche that warrants scientific study and treatment. The fact is, hate exists in the human pantheon of emotion for a reason. It serves to give us, individually and collectively, warning of danger. Not an immediate danger, like saber-toothed tiger danger, but subtler, more abstract danger: foolish patterns of behavior to be shunned, oblique acts of aggression taken against us, etc. It serves to give impetus to action. Like all other emotion, it is a far better servant than master; there is always a risk of being consumed by it, but without some capacity for Hatred, you will be consumed by everything else. Like it or not, hate is part of being human. Hate should not and cannot be swept under the rug like our butter-soft modern society is trying to do. Hate is an integral and vital part of the fight to survive on a hostile world.

            (Author unknown to me).

          • Blind hate distorts good judgement Nelson.Study your foe and reply with a measured reponse.You like others are falling for their trap.They will turn rash judgement and knee jerk reactions against us.Be angry,have resolve, but also be clever.

  16. The Khazars started playing both ends against the middle 1200 years ago. They were surrounded by Muslims and Christians, so they adopted Judaism, although they themselves are a Turkic tribe. Their solidarity has carried them far beyond their short-lived original kingdom. Considering that the American regime of irredeemable currency is bound to destroy the nation, one suspects that today’s Khazars are already looking for a new patron state to be their cat’s paw

    • The emerging facts suggest you’re correct on this trans-generational syndicate searching about for the next nation to befriend in order to defraud. India had best be worried at the ongoing imbedding process there with these thugs arming them and with Tel Aviv advising on catalyzing the conflict in Kashmir and the Pashtun area. Serial provocations and ongoing crises are their stock in trade. Debt has long been the prize for those skilled at pitting two sides against the middle while profiting off the misery of both. The only modern component of this ancient duplicity is the technological capacity to deceive on a genuinely global scale.

  17. We’ll see if Obama signs any legislation sanctioning Iran. Actions speak louder than words.

    In any case, if Obama actually wanted to fight our real enemy, Israel, he’d start by cutting off the aid. He has the constitutional authority and he’d have the backing of the people on that.

    He could also order the Justice Dept. to do a real investigation into 9/11 and the anthrax attacks.

    Obama has the power and would have the popular support to solve this problem. I hope I’m wrong, but I predict that he has neither the guts nor the moral competency required.

    • Mumble_2008 => “Obama has the power and would have the popular support to solve this problem. I hope I’m wrong, but I predict that he has neither the guts nor the moral competency required.”

      What did you put in your coffee this morning? This paragraph is absolutely wrong. Obama does NOT have the power and popular support to solve this problem. As for ‘guts and moral competency’ you are partly right.

      There is an old saying, “In youth we learn; with age we understand”. Obama is still mentally a young pup, better yet, a confused young pup. I don’t think he is close to having the understanding put put the Israel problem in perspective. Plus, who’s funded and supported him in the past? Who does he need in the future?

      At least, mumble, I’ll give you credit. You’re starting to think for a change rather than parrot.

      Respond if you are able. We need to give Jeff’s post broad coverage!

      Tom the Texas Vet.

      • Sorry but I don’t give lessons in Constiutional law over the internet; especially to fools such as yourself.

      • I agree with your questioning whether Pres Obama has‘guts and moral competency.’

        The confused young pup lanaguage seems gratuitous.

    • Let’s hope that assessment falls short. Certainly other presidents have grown in the job. The lobby doesn’t miss much. By legislating a 10-year funding commitment ($30 billion), any change now requires an active repeal, another barrier among many for anyone who summons the drive to take on this enemy within. Thanks for commenting.

  18. Gordon.How is this perilious bond broken when Congress has just voted 400-11 for sanctions against Iran? Could have Israel alluded to a nuke strike against Iran and thus Congress buckles under the pressure? ie the lesser of two evils.

    It is Israel who is pressed for time.They want war now as a cover for their treachery.

Comments are closed

 

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Join Our Daily Newsletter
  View Newsletter ARCHIVE

WHAT'S HOT

  1. Veterans Push To Test Marijuana As a Life-Saving Treatment for Crippling PTSD
  2. US Threatens Russia
  3. Top 10 Veterans Stories in Today’s News – April 23, 2014
  4. Obama Administration Launches Online Veterans Employment Center
  5. Meet Dave, Your Christian ‘Dyno-Rod’
  6. Press TV – Who Wins the Battle over Ukraine ?
  7. “Gitmo unconstitutional result of 9/11 false flag”
  8. Soap Stories, Gas Chambers, and the Magic Number (Part VII)
  9. NEO – Saudi Arabia: Preparations for Regime Change
  10. Prophet or Profit? Nikola Tesla’s Vision vs J.P. Morgan’s Greed
  11. Veterans Today was Right – Ukraine Jewish Registration Flyer was Fake
  12. Top 10 Veterans Stories in Today’s News – April 22, 2014
  13. The Iran/Iraq War: Mutual Assured Destruction
  14. Body-Mind Restoration: ‘Too Good To Be True’ for Addiction and Disease?
  15. Kevin Ryan: 9/11, Mind Control and the Holocaust
  16. US Squandering Prestige for Denying Visa to Aboutalebi
  17. Lee Wanta, American Hero
  18. NEO – Second Wind for China’s String of Pearls Strategy – Part 2
  19. Easter Exorcism
  20. Government Clampdown on NET Freedom Hits Mexico
  1. FauxScienceSlayer: Tesla was the inventor of radio and had his four critical patents held by a Rockefeller lackey that was head of the US Patent Office while the elite arranged for ...
  2. epieye: Jim, I've listened to you long enough to know you're honest and sincere about your search for the truth; but please don't attack those truthers who disagree with your conclusions. ...
  3. ronaldhoy: According to Gordon Duff, His group is in possession of 6-7 pieces of technology that produces energy other than what is commonly known and would be nice to roll it ...
  4. Cold Wind: Meanwhile, Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel and US Joint Chief of Staff Chairman Martin Dempsey play their respective roles in this foolish, unconscionable Obama venture. We must by now conclude ...
  5. molecule: There may be some truth in the Bush-Scherff story. Skorzeny may also have been deployed to release a shoe box filled with half truths as a distraction. The Bush family ...

Veterans Today Poll

When will the New World Order One World Government officially be announced?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Archives