FACEBOOK
TWITTER
Study Raises Questions About Military’s Brain Injury Assessment Tool
By Katherine McIntire Peters Government Executive
Senior Defense Department officials have stressed repeatedly in public they are doing everything they can to provide the best care possible to U.S. troops injured in Iraq and Afghanistan. But that might not be the case for the tens of thousands of troops who have experienced some form of brain injury.
Photo: Joe Radle/Getty Images
Four years ago, a group of Air Force doctors treating wounded soldiers at field hospitals in Iraq sought a better way to evaluate the impact of blast injuries on soldiers’ brains when there were no visible head wounds — a condition known as mild traumatic brain injury. Mild TBI can be deceptive, because it often occurs without any outward signs of trauma. A soldier can recover completely from mild TBI, but left undiagnosed and untreated, it can lead to serious impairment over time, especially if the individual is exposed to additional blasts later on.
Lacking an adequate tool to help determine when it was safe to send soldiers back to combat, Air Force doctors in 2006 began using an off-the-shelf, Web-enabled assessment tool called the Cognitive Stability Index, developed by a small, New York-based company called Headminder. At least one of the Air Force doctors had used it before, liked it, and believed it could work well in the field.
The CSI was developed in 1999 by David Erlanger, a neuropsychologist, to measure deterioration, improvement or stability in people whose brain function has been compromised, either through illness, disease or injury. It has been used in a number of drug research studies and clinical settings and has a good track record, doctors unaffiliated with Headminder told Government Executive.
Read more Government Executive
Short URL: http://www.veteranstoday.com/?p=32929
Posted by Bob Higgins on May 25 2010, With 0 Reads, Filed under Health. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
COMMENTS
To post, we ask that you login using Facebook, Yahoo, AOL, or Hotmail in the box below.Don't have a social network account? Register and Login direct with VT and post.
Before you post, read our Comment Policy - Feedback
[...] Study Raises Qυеѕtіοחѕ Abουt Military's Brain Injury As… [...]
[...] Study Raises Qυеѕtіοחѕ Abουt Military’s Brain Injury … [...]
Good post, Bobby Higgins.
I failed that CSI test so miserably that they sent me back for a second one. but then, you knew that already, I bet — from my (hopefully humorous) responses.
One of Ms. Peters’ problems is that she doesn’t understand what a TBI is all about. Often times, with a coups-contracoup event (like from a explosion) the brain gets rattled withing the skull, slamming against internal bony proturbances. These are closed injuries as opposed to the more obvious penetrating wounds from bullets, shrapnel, etc. CSI will only recognize the damage quite sometime later when the brain starts to heal and scar tissue forms, interrupting many neural networks.
The other problem medical scientists have is determining what neural networks (amongst the zillions in the brain matter) will get screwed up. It is easy to spot someone who loses their hearing or partial eyesight, or develops a horrendous limp. But it is much trickier in the memory / cognitive / decision making / intellectual response / emotional reaction (i.e. PTSD) areas of the brain.
It is the same subset of issues Stever Rizzo has to analyze with his PTSD virtual reality. That’s why the study raises very real questions.
Good catch and post, though, Mr. Higgins.
Tom Dillman Texas Vet
[...] Study Raises Questions About Military's Brain Injury Assessment … [...]
[...] Study Raises Questions About Military’s Brain Injury Assessment Tool : Veterans Today [...]