GPD is our General Posting Department whereby we share posts from other sources along with general information with our readers. It is managed by our Editorial Board

View Latest Posts >>>

The Militarization of American Society Has Gone Too Far

“The savage thug who believes he can control reality by the use of his club… has been supplanted by the Gucci-suited technocrat who believes he can create reality by simply pushing a button or issuing an order. By commanding black-winged jet fighters to blast his enemies out of existence, the modern Attila believes he is constructing a new reality, one where his whims, his prejudices, his prissy little orthodoxies have the force of natural law. In short, the neocons are just plain crazy.” –  Claes Ryn; Words: 1792

Lorimer Wilson, editor of www.FinancialArticleSummariesToday.com, provides below further reformatted and edited [..] excerpts from an article* presented by The Daily Bell  (http://www.thedailybell.com)  for the sake of clarity and brevity to ensure a fast and easy read. The Daily Bell article goes on to say:

The interesting comments made below by William J. Astore, a retired U.S. Air Force lieutenant colonel who teaches history at the Pennsylvania College of Technology, are fairly impervious to criticism as it is obvious that Astor is an American patriot, and writes as a concerned citizen. From our perspective, it adds to the faint tonality we think we have detected as regards a general retreat from the overt militaristic rhetoric of America’s leaders in the previous decade.

A Snappy Uniform Does Not a Hero Make

Here at the Bell, we have long been aware of the dominant social theme of “American military as heroes.” It has, in our view, been an incredibly successful and powerful dominant social theme. The simple act of putting on a military “uniform” within current contexts ennobles a young person at the beginning of his or her life. Astor goes on to say:

“Certainly, military service (especially the life-and-death struggles of combat) can provide an occasion for the exercise of heroism, but simply joining the armed services does not make you a hero, nor does the act of serving in combat. Still, ever since the events of 9/11, there’s been an almost religious veneration of U.S. service members [and New York City police and firemen] as “Our American Heroes” (as a well-intentioned sign puts it at my local post office).

But a snappy uniform — or even dented body armor — is not a magical shortcut to hero status. A hero is someone who behaves selflessly, usually at considerable personal risk and sacrifice, to comfort or empower others and to make the world a better place. Heroes, of course, come in all sizes, shapes, ages and colors, most of them looking nothing like John Wayne or John Rambo or GI Joe (or Jane).”

The militarization of American society is a long-term project in our opinion. It began shortly after Vietnam when the Pentagon, confronting the wreckage of failed military policies, began a rehabilitation campaign that resulted in the formation of a private, volunteer army. In retrospect, this approach was wildly successful. The all-volunteer army provided a way for the military-industrial complex to separate itself from the larger society and build its own power-base and expand funding sources unconstrained by negative public perceptions.

The U.S. Military Is Taught to be Contemptuous

It is almost a truism by now that those in the U.S. military are in some sense contemptuous of their civilian counterparts. They are in fact taught (in a sense) to be contemptuous because it is part of the process of breaking down a potential soldier’s personality in order to remove the social, ethical and biological barriers to killing. The soldier during this process becomes profoundly “other’ – which is one reason why so many have trouble reintegrating when they return to civilian life. The U.S. suicide rate among young military veterans is tragically high.

What is also true about the modern American military is that those who have a military background have been increasingly welcomed into the standing power structure of the United States. The CIA, FBI and myriad intelligence agencies recruit from a military pool and thus military attitudes increasingly pervade these government entities.

The militarization of America’s leadership has numerous ramifications, among them the assumption that military activity itself can trump culture, economics and of course individual human action. Confronted with the arrogance of the Barack Obama administration, one tends to forget the determined hubris of the Bush regime – and the notion that military activity was intrinsically valuable.

The U.S. Military Has Created Its Own Reality

Here’s an excerpt from a famous article by Ron Suskind, a former Wall Street Journal reporter that appeared in an issue of Sunday’s New York Times Magazine way back in 2004:

“In the summer of 2002, I had… a meeting with a senior adviser to Bush…[who] told me something that at the time I didn’t fully comprehend – but which I now believe gets to the very heart of the Bush presidency. The aide said that guys like me were ‘in what we call the reality-based community,’ which he defined as people who ‘believe that solutions emerge from your judicious study of discernible reality.’

I nodded and murmured something about enlightenment principles and empiricism. He cut me off. ‘That’s not the way the world really works anymore,’ he continued. ‘We’re an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you’re studying that reality – judiciously, as you will – we’ll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that’s how things will sort out. We’re history’s actors . . . and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do.'”

This anecdote, as related above, became a kind of Internet sensation. It encapsulated in a profound way an expansive approach to the American “exception,” one that harkened backwards rather than forward. The American exception, in its initial, colonial incarnation, had to do with the creation of a republican society that would be different than the class-ridden and soul-suffocating societies of ancient Europe. It would avoid the twin traps of governmental repression and authoritarian hubris.

Suskind’s reporting seemed to show that impulse had departed from the heads of America’s ruling class 250 years later to be replaced by the very sort of thinking that the American founders had hoped to avoid. There were many Internet commentaries on Suskind’s piece. Here’s an eloquent excerpt from Justin Raimondo at Antiwar.com:

The U.S. Military Exhibits Great Conceit

“Anyone who believes that governments create reality is living in a fantasy world, and is surely no conservative, neo- or otherwise, either politically or temperamentally. As the conservative philosopher Claes Ryn has pointed out, “Only great conceit could inspire a dream of armed world hegemony. The ideology of benevolent American empire and global democracy dresses up a voracious appetite for power. It signifies the ascent to power of a new kind of American, one profoundly at odds with that older type who aspired to modesty and self-restraint.”

Conceit, as I have pointed out before, has always been the defining characteristic of the imperialistic personality, but the sort of hubris exhibited above – “We’re an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality” – goes beyond anything the world has yet seen. The maddest of Roman emperors took care to propitiate the gods, even as they accorded themselves divine status. But none dared venture their own creation myth. This is not just a new kind of American, as Professor Ryn would have it, but a new species of madmen.”

The Elite Has a Perception of America-as-empire

The epistemology of modern-day imperialism gives us a glimpse into minds afflicted with a novel form of mental illness, one made possible not only by the concentration of centralized power in the American metropolis, but also by advanced technology and the evolution of the military arts. The savage thug who believes he can control reality by the use of his club – Ayn Rand called this archetype “Attila,” after the infamous Hun – has been supplanted by the Gucci-suited technocrat who believes he can create reality by simply pushing a button or issuing an order. By commanding black-winged jet fighters to blast his enemies out of existence, the modern Attila believes he is constructing a new reality, one where his whims, his prejudices, his prissy little orthodoxies have the force of natural law. In short, the neocons are just plain crazy.”

As we have mentioned, we believe we have detected some moderation in the perspective of the elite as regards military power and authoritarianism generally. The president of the Council on Foreign Relations, Richard N. Haass recently published a Newsweek cover story pointing out that the Afghanistan war was pretty-much unwinnable and needed to be “managed” to a successful conclusion.

The Washington Post has just published a series of cautionary reports about the uncontrolled growth of America’s “terror-industrial” complex. We are also cognizant of noises of dismay emanating from the Pentagon as regards budgetary inefficiencies. In fact, there seems to be a realization among the top brass that the days of unconstrained spending are over and that past attitudes toward budgetary matters must be moderated. (Perhaps there is even some rethinking about the merits of an upcoming Iranian war?)

None of this, of course, adds up to a reversal of the elite’s perception of America-as-empire. Indeed, the Anglo-American axis increasingly bestrides the world like the ancient Colossus of Rhodes, surveying all it sees and determined, apparently, to impose its form of increasingly authoritarian regulatory democracy on every region it can possibly control – Afghanistan included. What has changed in our view is the perception that such impositions are in any sense easy-to-accomplish or inexpensive, or that the outcome is pre-ordained.

The U.S. Military Has Put Our ‘Civil Society’  In Jeopardy

For the past decades, especially under the Bush administration, the trends seemed to run against civil society. Habeas corpus was attacked, torture was legitimized along with anonymous “rendition.” Most recently, the Obama administration has claimed the right to shoot American citizens on sight (and without any form of “due process”) if it considered them a “terrorist” threat, or aiding and abetting a terrorist war effort.

Conclusion: Speak Out Against the Military Mindset

What does offer hope, however, is the Internet which acts as a platform to speak out against the military mindset; the increasing difficulties that Western societies are having in funding military ventures; that what we consider to be a whiff of military modesty grows more noticeable; and perhaps the fact that the powers-that-be themselves have concluded that the pendulum has swung too far in one direction and are, as such, in danger of some sort of blowback.

Any rhetorical support for civil society – as opposed to the virtues of authoritarianism – is encouraging even though history shows us that the battle to restore the liniments of civil society to a culture that has abandoned them is difficult and often unsuccessful.

*http://thedailybell.com/1232/Does-War-Make-a-Hero.html

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Related Posts:

  • No Related Posts


The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT, VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians, or the Veterans Today Network and its assigns. LEGAL NOTICE - COMMENT POLICY

Posted by on July 23, 2010, With 1451 Reads Filed under Government & Politics. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

FaceBook Comments

10 Responses to "The Militarization of American Society Has Gone Too Far"

  1. David A. White  July 23, 2010 at 10:08 pm

    I agree that the military/industrial complex has gotten out of hand, but you must remember that the military is not running things in the great rotten city in the sky. Civilians from Harvard and other elite school graduates run the American military and you can place the blame directly at their feet. Look at all the department secretaries and under secretaries and see where they graduated from. You can bet your ass, if the military was in charge, it would not be so f…..up.

    • Nelson_2008  July 24, 2010 at 2:16 am

      If people would simply recognize what’s happened to “our” country, and stop joining the military, and stop participating in the senseless brutality and mass murder, for the sake of the bloodthirsty madmen pulling the strings, we’d at least have a chance to get our country back.

      But as long as we pretend that the “soldiers” are essentially blameless for their actions, and heap all the blame on the psychopaths in charge, we’ll never be able to stop this madness until we’re totally destroyed.

    • Richard  July 24, 2010 at 10:05 am

      You really have no idea what you are talking about. “just stop joining the military. It will fix all our problems.” I don’t think I have ever heard a more ignorant or unfeasible statement in my life. A military or militia of some sort is necessary for a nation state to survive. With no military you are asking to be destroyed, invaded or annexed.

    • Nelson_2008  July 24, 2010 at 12:01 pm

      Dick said:

      “You really have no idea what you are talking about. ‘just stop joining the military. It will fix all our problems.'”

      #######################################################

      You should consider pulling your head out of your ass and getting some air.

      ########################################################
      Dick said:

      “I don’t think I have ever heard a more ignorant or unfeasible statement in my life.”

      #########################################################

      Coming from a mentally and morally defective fool such as yourself, that’s a great compliment. Thanks.

      ##########################################################

      Dick said:

      “A military or militia of some sort is necessary for a nation state to survive.”

      ###########################################################

      Yo, knucklehead, first of all, our “nation state”, i.e., the one supposedly founded in 1776, no longer exists. And all the while it was being over thrown, from within, what good was our “military”?

      How did slaughtering Filipinos or slaughtering Germans or dropping atomic bombs on Japanese civilians or slaughtering Vietnamese or or slaughtering Koreans or slaughtering Arabs or slaughtering Serbs do anything positive for the “nation state” founded in 1776?

      What our “military” is doing is bankrupting us while making us less safe by slaughtering people who never did anything to us. What our military is doing is facilitating our complete destruction by helping the Jewish supremacist madmen pulling the strings.

      Someday soon, if not stopped, “our military” will probably be instrumental in bringing Russian and/or Chinese nuclear missiles down on us. I bet you’ll really appreciate that, won’t you?

      ######################################################

      Dick said:

      “With no military you are asking to be destroyed, invaded or annexed.”

      #####################################################

      ROTFL! As I’ve already endeavored to point out to you, our “nation state” has already been destroyed. (BTW, Panama and Costa Rica, for example, have no “military”, how come they still exist?)

  2. Tom Dillman  July 23, 2010 at 9:34 pm

    Actually, Claes Ryn is blabbering like a nutcake. At the first threat to his complacency he will (like the rest of his waste of sperm kind) crawl and BEG the American military to protect him.

    T.

    • Nelson_2008  July 24, 2010 at 12:07 am

      Actually, there is no more “American military”, because there is no more “America”. It’s gone; long gone. What we have now is a perverse, Judeofascist dictatorship, whose military doesn’t “protect” anything or anybody. In fact it makes everything and everybody less safe. It murders lots of people in the course of conducting its illegal, immoral, pointless and stupid Zionist crusades.

      When the time comes, ZOG’s military forces will be shooting people down in the streets here, just like they’ve been doing all over the world.

    • Seeker  July 24, 2010 at 1:08 pm

      You are correct. The once great and noble US military has become by and large just a highly armed police force, now being used abroad in preparation for the time soon when it will be used at home to keep the “elites” in power.

      We really have become a tyranny in which the rights of the people mean little (stop exporting the g_dddam economy!) and the wishes of the multi-nationals and bankers mean all, (More tax cuts, anyone? How’s that illegal alien amnesty thingey working out for you, Mr. Joe and Jill Six Pack?).

You must be logged in to post a comment Login


TOP 50 READ ARTICLES THIS MONTH
From Veterans Today Network