JOIN VT | NEWSLETTER
VETERANS TODAY ON : FACEBOOK | TWITTER | FORUM
|

“Every War Must End”


July 31, 2010
Da Nang, Vietnam
Chuck Palazzo

“Every War Must End”

The words of military strategist Fred Ikle.  But, tomorrow, August 1, 2010, the new International Ban on Cluster Munitions is lacking three crucial signatures:  Those from the United States, Israel, and Russia.  These three countries, well entrenched in war as we speak, and no doubt continuing to proliferate the use of cluster munitions as they engage their enemies at various levels, do not apparently show an interest in this legacy of war.  When the war is over, the fighting does not stop. Nor does the suffering of those who participated – many of us are veterans and we know this to be fact.  Many of us are civilians and know this to be fact.  But what about the unexploded ordinance? This remnant of war continues to kill – kill and maim the innocents.

More than 30 countries have ratified the Convention on Cluster Munitions, and over 100 have signed it since 2008.  But the three holdouts have used cluster bombs in the past decade.  Is it a defensive tactic?  Russia used cluster bombs in 2008 during its conflict with Georgia – Georgia also used cluster munitions against Russia.  Israel in 2006 during its conflict with Hezbollah – Hezbollah also used cluster munitions against Israel.  The United States used cluster bombs in both Afghanistan and Iraq wars – neither the Taliban nor Saddam used cluster bombs against US Troops.  Cluster munitions are prohibited for those nations that ratify the Convention on Cluster Munitions.  Because cluster bombs release many small bomblets over a wide area they pose risks to civilians both during attacks and afterward.  For those who have not ratified?  The killing, maiming, total disregard for human life continues.

Being attacked in battle then defending one’s life and limb is indeed what is necessary as many combat veterans will attest to.  Politics of war aside, combat is survival.  But what about the remnants of war?  The cluster munitions that are found in various parts of the world on a weekly, if not daily basis?  Since the end of the Vietnam War, for example, some estimates indicate more than 100,000 people have been killed from contact with these, and more than 200,000 people have been injured. Sixty-one provinces and cities still have landmines or UXO, and an average of 1,000 people are killed each year because of landmines or UXO.  Official figures show that the US dropped 413,130 tons of sub-munitions on Vietnam between 1965 and 1973.  This is Vietnam, how about the rest of the world?

What about Laos?

Laos has the dubious distinction of being the world’s most heavily bombed nation. During the period of the American Vietnam War, over half a million bombing missions dropped more than 5 million tons of ordnance on Laos, most of it anti-personnel cluster bombs. Each cluster bomb shell contained hundreds of individual bomblets, “bombies”, about the size of a tennis ball. An estimated 30% of these munitions did not detonate. Ten of the 18 Laotian provinces have been described as “severely contaminated” with artillery and mortar shells, mines, rockets, grenades, and other devices from various countries of origin. These munitions pose a continuing obstacle to agriculture and a special threat to children, who are attracted by the toy like devices.

LAO PDR: Cluster casualties continue

http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/fromthefield/220485/128040863348.htm

Lebanon?

In the aftermath of the 2006 war between Israel and Lebanon, it is estimated that southern Lebanon is littered with one million undetonated cluster bombs – approximately 1.5 bombs per Lebanese inhabitant of the region, dropped by Israeli Defense Forces in the last days of the war.

Ninety-eight percent of cluster sub-munitions casualties are civilians killed and injured while returning home in the aftermath of conflict or while going about their daily tasks to survive.

http://en.handicapinternational.be/Circle-of-Impact–report-on-the-human-impact-of-cluster-bombs_a467.html

UXO

As I researched this article, and through my own personal involvement with professionals and volunteers who fight against and clean-up the UXO disaster, the facts are staggering.  UXO – Unexploded Ordinance is a term used to describe “explosive weapons (bombs, bullets, shells, grenades, land mines, naval mines, etc.) that did not explode when they were employed and still pose a risk of detonation, potentially many decades after they were used or discarded”. Cluster bombs and mines certainly account for the majority of these munitions, but there are in fact UXO in the form of World War II bombs and earlier, found each and every year throughout the world. Unexploded ordnance from at least as far back as the American Civil War still poses a hazard worldwide.

The good news is organizations such as MAG – Mines Advisory Group, “clears the remnants of conflict for the benefit of communities worldwide”.

http://www.maginternational.org/

The bad news?  Countries such as The United States, Israel, and Russia will not sign or ratify the Treaty.  In effect giving them carte blanche to continue manufacturing and using cluster munitions well in to the foreseeable future.

This is the real chilling story and fact:

Imagine if, somewhere outside your front door, there is a powerful explosive weapon waiting patiently for you, or a member of your family, to disturb it. Because it’s hidden from view, avoiding it is a constant game of chance.

There could be one of them. There could be 100. You don’t know how many there are and neither does anyone else.

No one really knows how many are left.  For that matter, no one really knows how many were dropped or planted to begin with.  The numbers I found are indeed estimates – very low and conservative estimates.  But others, as the official statistics found regarding The Vietnam War, are closer the real numbers – but still, I am told, grossly understated.

By 1975, 294 cluster munitions had been delivered per square kilometer in Vietnam. This is about two cluster submunitions per person.


U.S. Ducks As Cluster Bomb Ban Takes Effect

The case against their use is well known: cluster sub-munitions are, in effect, the world’s deadliest duds. The bomblets have a failure rate of up to ten percent by some estimates — and can act as unexploded ordnance, going off in civilian areas after a battle has concluded, similar to landmines. The Cluster Munition Coalition, a group opposed to the weapons, estimates that 60 percent of cluster-bomb casualties are injured “while undertaking their normal activities.”

A dramatic example of the threat of UXO is the wreck of the SS Richard Montgomery off the coast of Kent, which still contains 3000 tons of munitions. When a similar World War II wreck, the Polish Kielce exploded in 1967, it produced an earth tremor measuring 4.5 on the Richter scale.

In 2008, the Pentagon agreed to scale back its use of cluster weapons, pledging not to use any bomb with a failure rate higher than 1 percent after 2018. So why isn’t the U.S. on board with an outright ban?

According to the Pentagon’s 2008 policy, cluster munitions are actually humane weapons. “Because future adversaries will likely use civilian shields for military targets – for example by locating a military target on the roof of an occupied building – use of unitary weapons could result in more civilian casualties and damage than cluster munitions,” the policy claims. “Blanket elimination of cluster munitions is therefore unacceptable due not only to negative military consequences but also due to potential negative consequences for civilians.” In other words, it’s better to use a cluster bomb on enemies using a building than to blow up the entire building.

Cluster opponents don’t buy it. “The vast majority of U.S. allies have banned this weapon,” Thomas Nash, the coordinator of the Cluster Munition Coalition, said in a statement e-mailed to Danger Room. “In line with his rhetoric on multilateralism, Obama needs to bring the U.S. in line with other nations that respect international law and the protection of civilians in armed conflict.”

Alternatives

I have read, as many of you probably have as well, “It’s been suggested that US Forces will not use cluster weapons when working with troops from nations that have signed the new treaty.
Development of alternatives, both in the US and elsewhere, is likely to be rapid.”

Ludicrous?  Absolutely!  An alternative to war?  Peace!  Why have these three nations not signed the Treaty?  To continue the war machine – at any cost.

I urge you all to become acquainted with this very real and life threatening problem.  Some of what I wrote above is pure commentary from me.  But the majority is fact taken from the references I acknowledge.  This is real and this is now.  Urge your legislators to become educated on the matter as well.  The Pentagon should not lead the US in policy making.  In my opinion, the war machine is so huge and out of control, it is time to stop the Generals and Admirals.  Cluster munitions, landmines and the like must no longer be manufactured, let alone used.  The clean-up must be increased world-wide.  But the ongoing use of these weapons of, yes, mass destruction, must end.  The World Leaders in War must become the World Leaders in Peace and clean-up the remnants they so often leave behind.

References:

Handicap International

MAG International

The Convention on Cluster Munitions

The International Campaign to Ban Landmines (ICBL)

Wikipedia

Wired



Related Posts:

  • No Related Posts

Short URL: http://www.veteranstoday.com/?p=42569

The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT or any other VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors or partners. Legal Notice

Posted by on Jul 30 2010, With 0 Reads, Filed under Politics. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
Apply for VA Loan Now Advertisement Get Educated at Excelsior College Get Educated at Excelsior College Get Your Loan Now Get Your Loan Now Get Your Loan Now Apply for your VA Home Loan Now Apply for your VA Home Loan Now Apply for your VA Home Loan Now Apply for Jobs on HireVeterans.com Now Apply for Jobs on HireVeterans.com Now Apply for Jobs on HireVeterans.com Now Become a Consultant

COMMENTS

To post, we ask that you login using Facebook, Yahoo, AOL, or Hotmail in the box below.
Don't have a social network account? Register and Login direct with VT and post.
Before you post, read our Comment Policy - Feedback


Comments Closed

7 Comments for ““Every War Must End””

  1. It is against the geneva convention to use weapons that do not stop when the war stops, so if the USA uses cluster bombs in a war it can be charged with war crimes.

    Imagine if cluster bombs startng turning up in school yards in the USA and American children started losing their arms and legs. I wonder what the American attitude to cluster bombs would be then.

    It is sad that a country that was once the shining star in the world is now a war criminal.

    • LOB: A “school yard” incident occurred here earlier this year, although it was not a cluster bomb but another piece of ordnance. Luckily, no one was hurt, but it was a close call by five minutes. The link is:

      http://www.landmines.org.vn/news/news_3.html

      Post-war ordnance explodes in Quang Tri school yard
      27-01-2010)
      Dong Ha, Quang Tri, 27 Jan 2010 – A Wednesday afternoon explosion of wartime ordnance in a middle school playground in Dong Ha City, Quang Tri Province, shook walls and shattered windows, but the 550 students who were in class at the time escaped injury. The accident occurred just five minutes before the students were scheduled to take a break from their studies, when they would have crowded into the school yard where the blast occurred… [read more]

  2. For more information about the dangers the wreck of Liberty ship SS Richard Montgomery presents look at http://www.ssrichardmontgomery.com The Richard Montgomery matter

  3. Military expediency meets the Geneva Convention. Humanity versus “collateral damage” & “acceptable long range risks for civilians & non-combatants”.

  4. There are indeed many organizations trying to make things right – but the unknown and unaccounted for volume of these munitions is just huge. Thousands of lives will continue to be taken in this horrendous way until and unless the superpowers of the world participate in the treaty.

    Some of the humanitarian orgs making things happen in a positive way:

    http://www.landmines.org.vn/index.html

    http://www.maginternational.org/news/vietnam-100000-items-of-uxo-removed/

    Chuck

  5. More on the topic of countries effected:

    Statistics are useful although comparisons are sometimes taken out of context, which is not my intent here, because it’s absolutely true that Lao PDR was the most heavily bombed country in the world per capita — given Laos’s relatively small population of about 6 million by current estimates.

    However, it’s quite possible that the situation in Vietnam is even more dangerous simply because of the huge difference in population density — 86 million Vietnamese occupying a fairly small area of highly contaminated lands, so there is likely a higher level of possible exposure just because there are so many more people moving around, thus many more accidents waiting to happen.

  6. Almost all of the signatories to the cluster-bomb munitions ban are not currently at war! The three nations mentioned which did not sign the treaty are all at war and most of their opponents are also using cluster munitions, eg. Hezbollah and Israel. If those three nations agree to the cluster munitions ban, what assurances are there that the forces at war with them would also comply with the ban? In asymmetrical warfare, insurgent forces do not comply with the rules of the Geneva Conventions on banned weapons. Will there be reciprocity in these wars? The U.S. does not use I.E.D., or E.F.P. munitions in Iraq or Afghanistan, yet they are used against American troops. Shouldn’t those munitions also be banned and shouldn’t such bans also be applied reciprocally to all combatants?

Comments are closed

 

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Join Our Daily Newsletter
  View Newsletter ARCHIVE

WHAT'S HOT

  1. Militia Group Finally Going to Trial
  2. U.S. Department of Defense Contract Awards for Feb. 09, 2012
  3. Bamboozeled- The NDAA Trojan Horse
  4. West’s Shenanigans against Syria, Iran
  5. Top 10 Veterans Stories in Today’s News – February 09, 2012
  6. New Online Enrollment Application Available for Servicemembers
  7. Army Looks to Ensure Consistent PTSD Diagnosis
  8. All We are Saying is Give Justice a Chance and All We are Doing is Telling Truth
  9. Chat I Just Had With Homeland Security
  10. Prosecution of Andrew Adler under Provisions of NDAA
  11. Where is Conyers With Impeachment Threats Against President for Iran Attack Now?
  12. Economic Recovery? What Recovery?
  13. U.S. Department of Defense Contract Awards for Feb. 08, 2012
  14. Obama 2012 – May The Farce Be With You
  15. Israel, Suppressed Story Verified
  16. Independent Report Contradicts Western Portrait of Syria
  17. Fukushima – 350 Times Maximum Annual Radiation Dose Permissible?
  18. Will American Troops be “Fighting For Our Freedom” in Iran?
  19. Top 10 Veterans Stories in Today’s News – February 08, 2012
  20. When Did the Soviet Socialist Republic of America Begin?
  1. taosword: The deal here is that our history (USA) started with a bunch of Europeans not wanting to take on their own...
  2. oldwoman: QUOTE: Can this be proof that the $27 trillion “Wanta” fund existed. Is there any other possible answer?...
  3. bahmi: I don’t understand “people driving Obama to war”…Hell, I don’t even know who...
  4. bahmi: During the 1800′s and early 1900′s, Europeans living in one of the many imperialistic nations...
  5. Gordon Duff: dan the issue is that if we believe we even have an issue they win


Apply for VA Home Loan Now!



SubscribeVT Radio Home Page







Archives