HOW ABOUT YOUR “STATUS” OF SOME RELIGIOUS/CULTURAL GROUP IS FOR
YOU TO ENJOY ALL YOU WANT, REALLY, GO BE HAPPY ,LEAVE US ALONE !!

AT THE SAME TIME , BUZZ OFF , KEEP YOUR HANDS & YOUR CONTROL FREAK CREEPY
AGENDA AWAY FROM OUR CHILDREN & OUR LIVES.

GUESS WHAT ?? ,WE HATE & ARE INTOLERANT OF CONTROL FREAK CREEPS WHO SEE IT AS THEIR SPECIAL PURPOSE TO TELL EVERYONE ELSE WHAT HISTORY,TRUTH, & THE PROPER
WAY TO THINK/BELIEVE IS. TAKE ALL YOUR PROPAGANDA/INDOCTRINATION AND
GO “GUILT TRIP” SOMEBODY ELSE.

WE ARE ALL DONE WITH YOUR CULTURAL/SOCIAL MARXISM

GO BUILD A FEW MILLION “HOLOHOAX” MUSEUMS ON URANUS.

lewrockwell/ANTI-SEMITISM DEFINED December 1990

Organized anti-anti-Semites will get away with their odious calumnies until they are finally forced to define their terms, to set up some rational criteria for this serious charge. It is high time that they be called on this loathsome tactic. So all right, just what is anti-Semitism: if we can get beyond vague and ephemeral “feelings?”

It seems to me that there are only two supportable and defensible definitions of anti-Semitism: one, focusing on the subjective mental state of the person, and the other “objectively,” on the actions he undertakes or the policies he advocates.

For the first, the best definition of anti-Semitism is simple and conclusive: a person who hates all Jews. But here Buchanan is clearly vindicated by everyone who has ever met him, since all agree he is not “personally” anti-Semitic, has many Jewish friends, saved the job of Mona Charen, etc. Here I also want to embellish a point: All my life, I have heard anti-anti-Semites sneer at Gentiles who, defending themselves against the charge of anti-Semitism, protest that “some of my best friends are Jews.” This phrase is always sneered at, as if easy ridicule is a refutation of the argument. But it seems to me that ridicule is habitually used here, precisely because the argument is conclusive. If some of Mr. X’s best friends are indeed Jews, it is absurd and self-contradictory to claim that he is anti-Semitic. And that should be that.

But perhaps it might be contended that X is at heart, down deep, anti-Semitic, and that he duplicitously acquires Jewish friends to cover his tracks. And how, unless we are someone’s close friend, or shrink, can we know what lies in a person’s heart? Perhaps then the focus should be, not on the subject’s state of heart or mind, but on a proposition that can be checked by observers who don’t know the man personally. In that case, we should focus on the objective rather than the subjective, that is the person’s actions or advocacies. Well, in that case, the only rational definition of an anti-Semite is one who advocates political, legal, economic, or social disabilities to be levied against Jews (or, of course, has participated in imposing them).

Let us then consider Pat Buchanan. Never – and the smear articles themselves are effective testimony to this fact – never has Pat Buchanan advocated any such policies, whether they be barring Jews from his country club or placing maximum quotas on Jews in various occupations (both of which have happened in the U.S. in our lifetime), let alone legal measures against Jews. So once again, it is absurd and a vicious calumny to call Pat anti-Semitic. If Pat passes any rational subjective or objective “litmus test” with flying colors, what else is there? It is high time and past time that the anti-anti-Semitic Smear Bund shut up about Buchanan and, while they’re at it, reconsider their other vilifications as well.

But am I not redefining anti-Semitism out of existence? Certainly not. On the subjective definition, by the very nature of the situation, I don’t know any such people, and I doubt whether the Smear Bund does either. On the objective definition, where outsiders can have greater knowledge, and setting aside clear-cut anti-Semites of the past, there are in modern America authentic anti-Semites: groups such as the Christian Identity movement, or the Aryan Resistance, or the author of the novel Turner’s Diaries. But these are marginal groups, you say, of no account and not worth worrying about? Yes, fella, and that is precisely the point.

I’m a racist scary type, not much different from the KKK? And you figured this out because I quoted a Bible verse? My spirit is sorely vexed.

Agape,
Infidel

Received this from Intifada Palestine by email.

Drean, you are correct; Jews in Israel kill or dislocate.

http://www.realzionistnews.com/?p=302

The Zionist War For World Domination

Welcome To “REAL ZIONIST NEWS!”

My Name Is Brother Nathanael Kapner.
I Am A “Street Evangelist.”

I Grew Up As A Jew.
I Am Now An Orthodox Christian.

I Wish To Warn How Zionist Jews
Are Destroying Christianity Throughout The World

The ADL Hates Our Freedoms

I HAVE BEEN LABELLED BY THE ADL as a “rabid Anti Semite.” And Real Jew News has been harassed by the “Anti Defamation League” by intimidating my last two Web Hosting Companies and causing them to shut down Real Jew News without warning. I have incurred much expense both in money & time because of the ADL’s intimidation tactics.

Americans are asking, “Why does the ADL hate us?” They hate us right here in our Internet chambers – a bastion of free speech. The ADL hates our freedoms – - our freedom to publicly display our love of Christmas, our freedom of speech, our freedom to have the press publicize all available presidential candidates, our freedom to disagree over US policy towards Israel.

The ADL indeed hates our freedom to disagree over US policy towards Israel. An example of this is illustrated in the incident known as “The Judt Affair.” On October 4 2006, a renowned NYU historian by the name of Tony Judt was scheduled to speak at the Polish Consulate in Manhattan. Judt was to give a talk on the Israel Lobby & planned to argue that the Israel Lobby stifles honest debate.

An hour before Judt was to arrive, the Polish Consul General, Christopher Kastryzk, canceled the talk. Kastryzk said that the Anti Defamation League had called and exercised “delicate pressure.” He quickly concluded Judt was too controversial. It was later discovered that it was Abraham Foxman, ADL’s director, who had called Kastryzk.

ADL BOASTS OF THEIR HATRED OF FREE SPEECH

THE ADL SEEMS TO BASK in its victories over those who wish to exercise their First Amendment rights. Here’s what Abraham Foxman, national director of the Anti-Defamation League, had to say about the Judt affair:

The Polish Consulate made the right decision. Mr Judt has taken the position that Israel shouldn’t exist. That puts him on our radar. We’ve been keeping tabs on Mr Judt.” View Entire Story Here & Here.

But Judt had this to say about the ADL:

“This is serious and frightening. This is a Jewish organization that believes they should keep people who disagree with them away from anyone who might listen.” View Entire Story Here & Here.

And that about sums it up doesn’t it my fellow Americans? We have a true terrorist organization and terrorist leader right here in the good ‘ol USA.

Indeed – The ADL Simply ‘Hates’ Our Freedoms…
__________________________________

For More See: “A Brave New ‘Zionist’ World” Click Here

And: “3 Main Characters Of The Jewish Lobby” Click Here
And: “George Orwell’s Zionist Nightmare” Click Here

…brilliant.

There is a way and a method to fight Islamic extremists. Your way is based on ignorance and shows the depth of your education on the subject.

You do not promote peace or solutions you promote ignorance. I am also guessing you are raising your children as you are yourself.

“From the Mediterranean to Baghdad” – “To your descendants I have given this land, from the river of Egypt to the great river, the River Euphrates …” Genesis 15:18

War criminal Ariel Sharon has quoted this verse.

The end is rear,
Infidel

Any non-muslim who supports this mosque has a lot of catching up to do.

It is a known fact throughout history before you kill someone you have to dehumanize them. John Gacy along with all the other serial killers throughout history!

ADL along with their supporters in Hollywood, Congress, White House and the media are dehumanizing Muslims and those who want peace.

They are now dehumanizing Arabs. Meaning to kill an Arab Muslim is like killing a rabid dog. Yes Reverend John Hagee is as guilty of this as Abe Foxman.