.
Advertisement

The Vast Intelligence Buildup Is to Oil Pentagon War Machine


Pentagon: Please do not feed

David M Kennedy of Stanford Univeristy: “The army is at war, but the country is not. We have managed to create and field an armed force that can engage in very, very lethal warfare without the society in whose name it fights breaking a sweat.” The result, he said, is “a moral hazard for the political leadership to resort to force in the knowledge that civil society will not be deeply disturbed.”

Before the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, “Americans were called upon by their leaders to pay higher taxes during a war, and grumbling or not grumbling, they did it,” said Robert D. Hormats, the under secretary of state for economic, energy and agricultural affairs and the author of “The Price of Liberty: Paying for America’s Wars.”
 (
Bumiller, July 24, 2010, NYT) –

By Sherwood Ross

The Washington Post’s revelations re the amazing growth of the U.S. intelligence community since 2001—so that we now have 1,271 agencies employing more than 854,000 payrollers—makes no sense, until one recognizes that this vast development  must be for offensive,  not  defensive, purposes. The explosion in the spy budget from $30 billion to $75 billion since 9/11 is perplexing until you realize it only parallels what is happening across the broad spectrum of the military-industrial complex. Everywhere you turn, everywhere you look, American militarism is on the march like a thousand Sousa bands blaring at once. According to a report of the Stockholm Internatonal Peace Research Institute, U.S. military spending for 2009 accounted for 43% of the world total, followed by China, with 6.6%; France, 4.2%; and U.K. with 3.8%

Where the U.S. allocated “only” $272-billion for “defense” in fiscal year 2000, today’s “defense” budget  is $711 billion. The U.S. Navy, for example, is larger than the next 11 navies of the world combined. At the same time, spending on research involving biological warfare has zoomed steadily since 9/11 to a cumulative total exceeding $50 billion even though no nation poses such a threat to the U.S., and even though the deadly anthrax attacks of October, 2001, emanated not from the Middle East but from Ft. Detrick, Md., a base whose operations are run by the Pentagon, not Osama bin Laden. Again, illustrating USA’s aggressive priorities, the National Institutes of Health of Bethesda, Md., is now spending more money on biological warfare—-which killed a total of five Americans in the last decade—than it spends on research to prevent ordinary flu, which does kill 36,000 Americans every year.  To its credit, Moscow shuttered its germ warfare ops years ago. Recall, too, that when the Pentagon’s snoops got to Iraq, they found Saddam Hussein but they couldn’t find a single germ. So what’s the big buildup for?

At any given time, the Pentagon has about $1 trillion or more in ongoing research to refine existing, (example: nuclear bombs) and to create new, (example: robots) killing machines to dominate the planet militarily. The vast  intelligence apparatus The Post uncovered (The National Security Agency alone is sifting through more than 1.7 billion telephone calls and e-mails daily), makes no sense when the only enemies are a handful of shoe bombers. It makes perfect sense, though, when the Pentagon is intimidating the world by ringing it with 800 bases in 130 countries (plus 1,000 at home), and when the intelligence build-up is companion to the military build-up. Thus it was the U.S. eavesdropped on the private telephone conversations of high United Nations officials then debating whether to support the impending U.S. invasion of Iraq. That’s not using intelligence for defense. 

In an article on the Middle East wars, Elisabeth Bumiller of The New York Times July 25th quotes historian David Kennedy of Stanford as saying: “The army is at war, but the country is not. We have managed to create and field an armed force that can engage in very, very lethal warfare without the society in whose name it fights breaking a sweat.” The result, he said, is “a moral hazard for the political leadership to resort to force in the knowledge that civil society will not be deeply disturbed.” Precisely!

Quoted in the New York Times of the same day, Stephen Daggett, a writer for the Congressional Research Service, said, “You think of war as not being the usual state.” That may well be true of many a republic, but it is not true of an empire, particularly the American Empire. According to the historian Edward Gibbon, the Roman emperor Aurelian, embroiled in numerous wars, complained in a private letter, “Surely, the gods have decreed that my life should be a perpetual warfare.” Of course, it need not have been thus except that Aurelian felt obliged to keep his foot on the neck of Rome’s subject peoples. It need not be thus for America, either.

(Sherwood Ross worked in the U.S. civil rights movement and reported for major dailies and wire services. He currently runs a public relations firm for good causes. Reach him at sherwoodross10@gmail.com)

Sherwood Ross

Sherwood Ross is an award-winning reporter. He served in the U.S Air Force where he contributed to his base newspaper.

He later worked for The Miami Herald and Chicago Daily News.He contributed a weekly column on working for a major wire service.

He is also an editorial and book publicist.He currently resides in Florida.

Latest posts by Sherwood Ross (see all)

Related Posts:

The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT or any other VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors or partners and technicians. Notices

Posted by on 11:14 am, With 0 Reads, Filed under Corruption, Politics. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Comments Closed

4 Responses to "The Vast Intelligence Buildup Is to Oil Pentagon War Machine"

  1. Sherwood Ross  July 31, 2010 at 7:09 pm

    Tom, your remarks are very funny. Speaking of vacations, makes me think besides taking his own kids to Europe, Obama should ask Congress to underwrite vacations for all Afghan’s childrens on the Riviera for the month of August. If he can’t do that, maybe he ought to task the Army Corps of Engineers to build 1,000 swimming pools in Iraq and Afghanistan. People would love him for that. If we think it’s hot Stateside we ought to try living in one of those desert countries for a time. And if Obama really wanted to win hearts and minds he could pull a lifeguard gig in Baghdad or Kabul, just to show folks he really cares. As it is, how can he take his own kids on a European vacation when the drone attacks he is authorizing are killing civilians nearly every day? Sherwood

  2. Tom Dillman  July 31, 2010 at 3:57 pm

    Sherwood, Just keeping track of the Internet explosion alone could account for that many jobs. Then tracking down and shaking hands with border drug cartel invaders could account for the rest. :-)

    T.

    • Tom Dillman  July 31, 2010 at 4:01 pm

      P.S. Sherwood, Obama’s parties, vacations, sports outings, Michelle and daughter’s trip to Europe, Hairy Reid’s campaign costs and Pelosi’s weekly plane trips to California — all this out of the taxpayers’ pockets should account for the rest.

      On the other hand, it was a good good article.

      T.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login


TOP 50 READ ARTICLES THIS WEEK