FACEBOOK
TWITTER
Why “Not “ Remember 9/11
Why “Not “ Remember 9/11
“Sometimes You Have To Stand Up When Standing Isn’t Easy”
Yes indeed why “not to” remember 9/11? This is a good question that needs to be asked of the world. We can always ask why we should remember 9/11. But is anyone asking why we should not remember 9/11? Well everyone can just make up their own reasons as to why they or others should remember 9/11.
We should all remember the victims, we should all remember the thousands of rescue efforts, we should all remember the after shock, and the effect on everyones lives. Let us remember the folks who are still here dealing with the aftermath of this great “Horrific Event” that captured the attention of the entire world on this very coincidental date. These are all very good reasons to remember. However it appears that we will never see the real reasons why we should “NOT” remember this “Horrific” date and event. Remembrance is not about seeking revenge against an unproven culprit, it is not seeking out fictitious enemies for the whim of a few “Blood Sucking Leaches” on the global society, remembrance is not about the exploitation, or the arming of groups of a few radicals to do the unjust dirty works of the same “Blood Sucking Leaches”.
Remembrance is not about taking advantage of the mass hysteria of those who “Succumb” .. Remembrance is not about an open pocket book to just write checks for death and destruction on a global scale. Remembrance is not about the “Fat Cats” getting fatter on this death and destruction.
When you remember 9/11 this time round you will be asked by the media and the “Succumbed “ to remember the so called perpetrators of this “Horrific Event”. This is a renewed attempt at seeking your approval to carry on this “Death and Destruction” at will, this is the very reason “Why Not to” remember this “Horrific Event”. If allowed this “Horrific Event” will, and has really already become your New “Holocaust “ with the old “Holocaust” all but forgotten and ignored the new has been brilliantly created for the very purposes of furthering the “Bloodsucking Leaching “ of the planets human resources, without resistance .Actually quite brilliant except for the fact this is not 1939 and this world is not the same world of uninformed people that existed in that era. This is now a world of connectivity something that the “Few” really don’t have. And the connected have already routed out the real perpetrator’s of this “Horrific Event”. As we watch this world plummet into a real live global crisis the real perpetrators are counting on the masses to not have the will or the ability to question or search out the truth in this matter, but rather will have nothing to do buy try and save their own lives and or livelihood.This time around try and remember all those masses affected in a very negative way, and then think of those few that have made a literal “Killing” from this “Horrific Event” Remember the thousands who have blindly walked into “The Shadow of The Valley of Death” seeking to destroy a falsely accused, accused with proven false evidence,and Intel not even close to real. Intel, not investigated, an accused not given trial let alone fair trial. So when you remember try and remember what do you really stand for -is it Truth and Justice or is it just for the sake of some kind of misdirected “Revenge”?
Why “Not” to remember 9/11. Go for truth and justice, don’t be duped again.
illegal activity
Related Posts:
Short URL: http://www.veteranstoday.com/?p=48546
Posted by greenrecovery on Sep 10 2010, With 0 Reads, Filed under 9/11, WarZone. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
COMMENTS
To post, we ask that you login using Facebook, Yahoo, AOL, or Hotmail in the box below.Don't have a social network account? Register and Login direct with VT and post.
Before you post, read our Comment Policy - Feedback
9-11 Up Close And Personal
By Gary Jacobucci
9-9-10
Presented at the bi-monthly Elko, Nevada Tea Party Meeting Sept. 7, 2010:
I inserted the agenda item of ‘Religion and the Tea Party Movement’ after receiving a couple of emails from the Elko Tea Party that referred to the Islamic threat; one of which mentioned the 9-11 attacks.
The fact that this latest wave of Islamophobia came along with the latest round of saber rattling for a combined U.S. / Israeli attack on Iran didn’t escape my attention.
Nor that a building three blocks away from the Ground Zeno complex in NYC that was being renovated into minor community center was described in the main stream media as “a Mosque that would serve as a training ground for terrorists, an insult to the victims of 9-11 and a tribute to Medieval Muslim subjugation of the West.”
And it was no surprise when the person funding the NYC project turned out to be a Saudi Prince who is business partners with Rupert Murdoch and Fox News the main news outlet hyping the story.
But on this 9th anniversary of 9-11, I’d like to revisit this issue that has served as the foundation for the war on terrorism that has used our soldiers as an international police force, brought this nation to the brink of bankruptcy and has generated so much hatred toward the U.S. around the world.
For those who think that talking about 9-11 is just fantasizing or being unpatriotic, let me point out that John Farmer, a former Attorney General of New Jersey who was the Senior Council to the Official 9/11 Commission has written a book and in there he bluntly states that the story and the conclusion of the 9-11 Commission are “entirely and inexplicably untrue.” So even the Chief Council for the 9-11 Commission says the story they told us is not true.
The idea that Islamic extremist were able to take over 4-jetliners using little box cutters is unbelievable in itself, especially with some of those pilots being combat veterans, but of the hundred issues that could be confronted on the official story, let me just address onewhere did the story of the box cutters come from anyway?
It came from one source; the call from Barbara Olsen, the TV newscaster, to her husband Ted Olsen, saying that the hijackers had taken the flight crew, the flight attendants, and the passengers and herded them to the back of the airplane – and that they were wielding box cutters.
In the Zacharias Moussaoui trial, the FBI testified that they only could find one call from Barbara Olsen and that call was unconnected in other words, she never called anybody.
So if there was no connected call to Barbara Olsen, then where did that information come from? It came from her husband, Ted Olsen who said he received three calls from her. Keep in mind that Ted Olsen worked for the Bush Administration.
Some will say “But I listened to her voice” and I would point out that in 1999, Sandia Laboratories had developed a digital voice ‘morphing’ technology. They displayed it to Colin Powell, who was aghast to hear himself say in a recording, “Gentlemen, we are here to plot the overthrow of the United States government.”
Of course he never said any such thing, but it was his voice, and all they have to do is have a snippet of your voice and they can construct lines of narrative and it’s your voice. And with Barbara Olsen, she was an on-air personality and there were many samples of her voice. So whether Ken Olsen was lying or he actually did receive the phone call, in either case it didn’t happen and yet that’s the bases of what we think we know about what happened on 9-11.
One might think this would be newsworthy, but it will never get the attention it deserves when 5-multinational corporations own all of the U.S. media under the control of the central banking authority those funding the multi-billion dollar consolidations.
On a personal note, when I was drafted into the Vietnam War, the thinking in the military was never allowed to evolve beyond “bomb those gooks back into the stone age.” So when the perpetrators of the 9-11 attacks were identified as Moslem extremists even before the fall of the second tower and the mantra of “bomb those rag heads back into the stone age” was heard within 24-hours of the attack, the warning bells began going off in my psyche.
I found my skin crawling when I saw the yellow ribbons being place all over Elko and the religious right being high jacked into mindlessly and unquestioningly waving the flag at another war with the idea that supporting the war was supporting the troops.
And I found myself completely disgusted when at the ‘support of the war is support of the troops’ movement, the story finally broke in the main stream media that the Gulf of Tonkin incident that led to a full blown U.S. invasion of Vietnam was a hoax to generate support for the war it never happened – and there was not the slightest reaction or consideration that this might be grounds for the American public to question this latest war.
When in the military, my support came not from the faith-based community that supported the war, but from those that had the courage and independence to question.
- Gary Jacobucci jacob48@citlink.net
Side note: Not many people pay attention to the think-tank white papers from NGOs even though they have been the main driving force for American political policy for the last hundred years, but one formed within the elite ranks of the Council on Foreign Relation needs mentioning.
In their treatise ‘Project for a New American Century’ and ‘Rebuilding America’s Defense’, the advisor board comprised of Cheney, Rumsfeld and several CFR members with dual-Israeli citizenship (Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, Lewis Libby, Bill Krystal, Elliot Abrams, Douglas Feith, Dov Zakheim among them) laid out a plan for a war in the Middle East, adding the caveat that it would be a tough sell to the American people without “a catastrophic and catalyzing event, like a new Pearl Harbor.”
We had our catalyzing and catastrophic event and they sold it. This group became the spokesmen for who was responsible for the attacks on 9-11 and the cheerleaders war on terrorism.
Wow! I will cut and paste your post and send it to everyone I know who has their head stuck in the sand. Well done!!
In their treatise ‘Project for a New American Century’ and ‘Rebuilding America’s Defense’, the advisor board comprised of Cheney, Rumsfeld and several CFR members with dual-Israeli citizenship (Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, Lewis Libby, Bill Krystal, Elliot Abrams, Douglas Feith, Dov Zakheim among them) laid out a plan for a war in the Middle East, adding the caveat that it would be a tough sell to the American people without “a catastrophic and catalyzing event, like a new Pearl Harbor.”
We had our catalyzing and catastrophic event and they sold it. This group became the spokesmen for who was responsible for the attacks on 9-11 and the cheerleaders war on terrorism.
we should never forget 9/11, and never give up exposing the truth.
Why is Bin Laden still NOT wanted by the FBI for 9/11
Just watch the free fall collapse of WTC 7 – only a controlled demolition could do this.
Is it just a coincidence that members of the Bin Laden family were meeting with Bush senior in Washington DC on 9/11 and they were allowed to leave the US.
seek the truth, demand justice and never forget 9/11
http://www.thenewalexandrialibrary.com/911truth.html
On this date I’m compelled to add this bit of often overlooked event in the 9/11 historical timeline. Just by chance I stumbled upon the story on 9/10/2001, and the fact that this assassination of a key political leader within Afghanstan was practically forgotten by the MSM in the aftermath of 9/11 has bugged me ever since. Apparently I’m not alone in this regard;
911 ANALYSIS: Two days Before 9/11, Shah Masood is Assassinated. Was it a Coincidence?
by Michel Chossudovsky
Nine years ago, on the 9th of September 2001, the leader of the Northern Alliance Commander Ahmad Shah Masood was mortally wounded in a kamikaze assassination. This event has a direct bearing not only on our understanding of 9/11 but also on the US-NATO sponsored war and occupation of Afghanistan.
Had Shah Masood not been assassinated, the US administration would not have been able to install their political puppet Hamid Karzai in Kabul.
Masood, rather than Hamid Karzai (a former employee of the UNOCAL oil company), could have become the head of the post-Taliban government formed in the wake of the U.S. bombings of Afghanistan.
In other words, the assassination of the leader of the Northern Alliance, was consistent with U.S. foreign policy objectives.
Since the late 1980s, the U.S. had sought to sidetrack and weaken Masood, who was perceived as a nationalist reformer, by providing support both to the Taliban and the Hezb-I-Islami group led by Gulbuddin Hektmayar against Masood.
Moreover, Masood was supported by Moscow. In the wake of his assassination, the Northern Alliance became fragmented into different factions. This also served to weakening Russian influence in Afghanistan.
!
Link to the above referenced article;
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=20987
[...] the mental midgets at Veterans Today who tell us to NOT remember [...]