When Is A Lie A Lie
We all know when we tell somebody something that is not true that is considered a lie. It seems a local candidate for mayor in the city of Radcliff, Kentucky, J.J. Duvall, has some cognitive difficulties determining what is a lie and what is not when he told a group of voters at a mayoral forum conducted by the NAACP that he graduated from the University Of Kentucky with a degree in political science in 2002. When asked about graduating from the University Of Kentucky with a degree from that school, which is not true, Duvall said he misspoke. I do not know how the other writers at Veterans Today or the many readers of this online publication feel about politicians stretching the truth, but I, for one, am getting so tired of politicians lying and then using the word misspoke as an excuse for the lie they got caught up in.
A Vietnam Veteran wannabe, Dick Blumenthal, running for a Senate seat from the state of Connecticut, just got caught lying about serving in the Vietnam War and used the same word, misspoke, as a way to downplay the fragrant lie, he told. Is that the new keyword for politicians to de-emphasize their lies when caught trying to deceive the voters?
In the News-Enterprise newspaper out of Elizabethtown, Kentucky which is right next door to the city of Radcliff, there was a candidate questionnaire and Duvall responded by stating he graduated from North Hardin High School in Radcliff, Kentucky and the University Of Kentucky, which is 80 miles east of Radcliff in the city of Lexington. He was asked about the information submitted on his questionnaire and he informed the paper that the information was incorrect. My question is, was he going to let this incorrect information stand if he was not confronted with the discrepancies? Then J.J. had an excuse why the questionnaire was filled out wrong, he said his staff had filled out the form and he had not proofread it before submitting it to the newspaper. A biography about J.J. Duvall was submitted to the Radcliff Woman’s Club recently and in it, Duvall stated he had a political science degree from the University of Kentucky. When asked about it, J.J. stated he was not aware of the error about him graduating from the University of Kentucky and took full responsibility if he mislead the public to believe he had a political science degree from that university. For a mayoral candidate who will work directly with the massive changes taking place at Fort Knox and must work hand-in-hand with the military leaders of the army’s now Human Resources Command Center if elected, one has to wonder if J.J. needs to be more aware of what staff members are writing about him, should be become a more efficient proofreader and definitely should use his dictionary more to learn the difference between a lie and misspeaking.
What is it about politicians at all levels of government who will lie and then when caught lying, will give some outlandish excuse for such behavior? This is not about what political party J.J. Duvall is affiliated with, nor about his opponent in the race, it is about J.J. Duvall telling the truth about his achievements or lack of, and running on his real record. Have we, as voters, become so numb and hardened to politicians lying like Mark Foley and Rod Blagojevich, having sexual trysts outside their marriage like Bill Clinton and Elliot Spitzer did or using their office for their own financial gain, William Jefferson caught with $90,000 dollars in his freezer or Duke Cunningham taking kickbacks and bribes that we just do not care anymore and accept their behavior? None of us are perfect in this world, and we all have had experiences in life we would gladly change if given the opportunity but most of us would not lie in the first place just to be elected nor would we pad our pockets once given the public trust to serve our fellow citizens. Until we, as voters, demand good ethical behavior and accountability from our politicians whether at the federal, state or local level, we will continue to get those that lie and serve themselves.
Short URL: http://www.veteranstoday.com/?p=56210
Posted by Joe "Ragman" Tarnovsky on Oct 23 2010, With 0 Reads, Filed under Veterans Affairs. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
COMMENTS
To post, we ask that you login using Facebook, Yahoo, AOL, or Hotmail in the box below.Don't have a social network account? Register and Login direct with VT and post.
Before you post, read our Comment Policy - Feedback
FACEBOOK
TWITTER
























[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by cw and Chaz, Veterans Today. Veterans Today said: New post: When Is A Lie A Lie http://bit.ly/afIVmF [...]
What’s the old politician motto,
It better to of lied about my lie, than not to of lied at all.
And you are correct about we all have things we lie about, Mine is that when asked if I served in the military I Always say NO.So as not have to answer questions of the thigs Ive seen.
A lie is when you tell your wife she is fat, or tell your momma, she needs her hair fixed, nah! no lie, just stupid, like the crap that comes out of the mouths wanting a job at the money trough.
You know what they say: How do you tell a politician is lying? Answer: His lips are moving.
All these A-HOLES that run for public office LIE. George Bush was a PROFESSIONAL at lying.so are all people running now to be elected in november. I WOULD LIKE TO SAY ANY ONE RUNNING FOR ELECTED OFFICE BE ADVISED. I WOULD HAVE YOU RUN WITH ( 100 DOBERMEN PINCHERS BEHIND ALL OF YOU. )
At least he did something military. Slick Willy Clinton did didily squat concerning veterans!
SMaj, I do not like Clinton, protested him at The Wall, Memorial Day 1993 but Bush is just as bad if not worse. Bush only served in the Air Guard as a way to make him look presentable for a future in politics and his dad supported the Vietnam War as a Congressman but did not support it enough to encourage his son to serve in Vietnam. I have no doubt that George W.’s daddy got him that coveted slot in the Air Guard. I would agree that George W. did more than than Clinton in the military, Bush W. showed up once in a while for his weekend drill but that would be nothing to brag about, SMaj. Both of these men were a disgrace and how they got elected president shows me the American public accepts their cowardly behavior when our Nation called us during Vietnam. It amazes me how people in the military will look up to and have respect for Bush or Cheney, one a Vietnam War SLACKER and the other a Vietnam War DRAFT DODGER that sent troops into a war based on LIES. Clinton is NO BETTER and it hurts me to say this but at least Clinton did not have a powerful “daddy” to help him avoid combat. Having said that, SMaj, both of these ex “Cowards In Chief” are nothing but TAKERS and have never given anything to our country.
Joe,…to a large extent I agree with you. As a combat vet myself of both Nam and the Gulfwar, I did vote for Bush because I did research on Kerry and found him to be worse than Bush. Read the book Unfit For Command. The auther challenged Kerry a million dollars if he could come up with anything untruthful in his book,……Kerry nor nobody did.