FACEBOOK
TWITTER
Release of the ‘Dancing Israelis’, Coincidence or Blackmail?
A Few Days after AA Flight 587 Crash: Government Covered Up
Likely Sabotage and Released Mossad Agents Arrested on 9/11
By Doug Steil | Aletho News | November 16, 2010
By now, after nine years, anyone who has seriously looked into the circumstances surrounding 9/11 has read about the so-called “five dancing Israelis“, who, according to reports, had set up across the Hudson River “to document the event” (in their own words) in Manhattan, even before the crash of the first airplane coming from the north into the World Trade Center tower.
These “dancing Israelis”, as we can all surmise, were Mossad operatives, who were involved in operational aspects of the Zionist attack on lower Manhattan that fateful day, September 11, 2001. Two additional “suspects”, who were surely also part of the same Israeli operational team, were arrested on the approach to the George Washington Bridge, and, as was reported live that evening on the televised News (before this aspect to the story was buried), their van was laden with tons of explosives. (Though media reports may not have explicitly identified the people in the vans with explosives as Israeli, there should be little doubt that they were all part of the same team.)
There are two important aspects in conjunction with the 9/11 event in New York that have been virtually ignored even in the alternative media, which deserve closer scrutiny. One point involves the possible large-scale catastrophe that may have been induced by these operatives with explosives if they had not been apprehended as their van was about to drive onto the George Washington Bridge. The second aspect concerns the suspicious circumstances surrounding the crash of Flight 587, on November 12, 2001, more than nine years ago, in conjunction with the inexplicable release, just a few days later, of the “dancing Israelis” and other agents who had been involved in the 9/11 operation, including those who may have been on their way to blow up the George Washington Bridge.
By stalling the van at the middle of the bridge and getting away in time, a directed high-power explosion at that spot along the side might certainly have done some serious damage to a section of this bridge, given the dual cables per side , each slightly less than 36 inches in diameter. Most likely a truck explosion in itself would not have ripped both cables. But then, perhaps such a truck explosion was merely meant to serve as a low-tech trigger – to provide an explanation to the public, for why both cables on one side could have ripped – which itself would have been achieved by detonating a prepared coat of micro-thermite around the cables, just as the WTC towers were detonated by micro-thermite placed at crucial points along the structure weeks in advance, though the Government unconvincingly blamed structural failure caused by impacting airplanes and resulting fires. In light of what is known about the explosive thermite at the three WTC towers that were imploded into their footprint, it is not implausible, that the George Washington Bridge was also targeted for destruction that day, but this aspect of the operation was completely botched due to the van being intercepted. Just a few months earlier, in May, modifications to the George Washingtom Bridge were completed. Who would have ever noticed if coatings of micro-thermite were being applied during this renovation project ? Below are some quotes from NYRoads:
The project involved the rehabilitation of girders, columns, bridge decks, drainage and electrical systems, and roadway surfaces. New roadway expansion joints, guardrails, crash barriers, signs and lighting were also installed. The $38 million project was completed in May 2001.
Some pertinent questions arise in this context. Might some “follow-up work” of minor scope have been performed after the reported May completion date, shortly before 9/11, under the guise that something had not initially been done properly and thus needed to be corrected? What companies were involved in that multi-million dollar contract, and which companies were involved in the subsequent project, which would have removed any traces of micro-thermite coating that, according to this presumptive scenario, was applied more than nine years ago?
In 2002, the Port Authority began work to repaint the 604-foot-tall towers and the underside of the upper deck. Workers are removing older coats of lead-based paint, and are applying a three-coat paint system that includes a zinc primer, epoxy intermediate coat and a urethane topcoat. The $85 million project was completed in 2006.
Some investigative scrutiny of this previously neglected topic could certainly help in putting more pieces of the puzzle together, regarding what appears to have been planned as a spectacular and explosive encore on that ‘Demolition Day’, featuring live helicopter video of a major suspension bridge falling into the Hudson River, with only its two towers remaining. If one assumes that these putative Israeli suspects, disguised in Arab clothing, were prevented by their arrest at the on-ramp to the bridge from perpetrating a major crime – this would subsequently have impacted millions of people who commute between New Jersey and Manhattan – one can understand that it would take substantial pressure to get them released from custody. And we know from numerous reports, that they were all released just before Thanksgiving.
But why were these Isareli operatives ever released given their involvement? According to a report written by Christopher Ketcham, the Ha’aretz newspaper claimed that high-level Zionists in America were actively involved in obtaining their release:
Following what ABC News reported were “high-level negotiations between Israeli and U.S. government officials”, a settlement was reached in the case of the five Urban Moving Systems suspects. Intense political pressure apparently had been brought to bear. The reputable Israeli daily Ha’aretz reported that by the last week of October 2001, some six weeks after the men had been detained, Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage and two unidentified “prominent New York congressmen” were lobbying heavily for their release. According to a source at ABC News close to the 20/20 report, high-profile criminal lawyer Alan Dershowitz also stepped in as a negotiator on behalf of the men to smooth out differences with the U.S. government.
These high-level efforts may not have been sufficient, given that these captured agents were certainly involved in more than event documentation or simply driving moving vans. Perhaps a bit more high-level pressure was required to get these people ‘moving’ again. In this context, an interesting aspect that has not been widely reported is the fact that, just a week before their eventual release, American Airlines Flight 587 crashed after takeoff from Kennedy Airport in Queens. Though it was not widely reported – on the contrary, it appears that once again there was a big cover-up in this matter – the likely cause, according to a credible expert, was sabotage:
Expert Marshall Smith opined, “A single point failure, the in-flight actuation of the left engine thrust reverser, can account for all three observed phenomena of the clean breaking off of the tail and the failure of both pylons holding the engines.”
The mechanical engineer, aviation ground school instructor and former NASA adviser painted this scenario: During the night, a terrorist saboteur disguised as a ground crew mechanic reached up in the back of the left jet engine of the American Airlines Airbus and cut the hydraulic line going to the thrust reverser actuator and the control safety sensor lines.
Knowing the conventional path that the airliner would fly upon takeoff from Kennedy Airport on its course to Santo Domingo in the Caribbean Sea, the saboteurs could be almost certain that the plane would eventually crash into the water, thus making recovery of evidence and probable cause analysis more difficult, along with the minimized possibility of any inconvenient revelations possibly leaking out to the public. As it turned out, the jet crashed onto the narrow land strip, in a neighborhood in Rockaway Park, (“the Irish Riviera“).
Let us look at the timeline of the week long period between the crash of AA587 and the release of the Israeli agents a few days later. Flight 587 crashed on Veteran’s Day, Monday November 12, 2001. According to reports, the Mossad agents were released after “71 days” in custody. Anyone can easily verify the accuracy of the timeline implied by the headline, which indicates the week long period between the crash and the release of the agents: Assuming that September 11 already counts as a day, that yields 20 days in September, 31 days in October and 20 days in November (the last day presumably not a full day), thus Tuesday, November 20. The decision to release them must have come on the day before, Monday, November 19, in order to make arrangements to fly them back to Israel. On that day the New York Times published a prepared story, pushing the highly questionable notion of composite tail fin stress as the presumptive cause of the accident. This unsupported claim appears to be another case of contrived media misdirection (an endeavor the NYT is proficient in), to distract the public from the issue of sabotage.
It is reasonable to assume, however, that if by then the Government had already concocted and propagated a technically unlikely explanation — one that blamed the manufacturer Airbus for an alleged design flaw in conjunction with pilot over-reaction to vortexes from an airplane ahead — the technically far more plausible cause of the crash, which was consistent with observations from witnesses and physical evidence at the crash site, would have already been apparent to investigators and experts, such as the man whose assessment of sabotage is cited in the story cited above. Those who had the opportunity to examine the left engine could easily have corroborated the sabotage. (This raises the question, if one of the numerous investigators became upset that the matter was being covered up and talked about it with others.)
Based on the timeline, these Israeli operatives would have arrived back in Israel not before November 21. They appeared on the talk show sometime before the end of the month, after a few days of intensive de-briefing.
Thanksgiving Day was on November 22, so that any possible news of their release from custody and arrival back in Israel would have easily been drowned out as Americans were focusing on that major holiday.
Related Posts:
Short URL: http://www.veteranstoday.com/?p=61408
Posted by Veterans Today on Nov 19 2010, With 0 Reads, Filed under 9/11, WarZone. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
COMMENTS
To post, we ask that you login using Facebook, Yahoo, AOL, or Hotmail in the box below.Don't have a social network account? Register and Login direct with VT and post.
Before you post, read our Comment Policy - Feedback
to all in general…
WOW, more and more profound revelations all the time! When I stop to consider the panic and paranoia that ensued just after 9/11, the fact people were afraid of their own mail (anthrax scare… something never investigated to my satisfaction), an already written and prepared Patriot Act to “protect” us, the creation of a whole new “industry” (Homeland Security), I gotta wonder how much longer this house of cards can survive? Excellent article and the most eye opening forum going! Thanks for all you do…
Cy in ID
JUST IN TODAY —-
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/19/world/middleeast/19stuxnet.html?_r=2
Why is Stuxnet not being universally condemned as terroristic, or an act of war? If it can screw up vital infrastructure industries in multiple countries, why should Israel be able to all but laugh and gloat about it like it was an office prank or an April Fool’s day joke? Is this scale of sabotage now accepted as commonplace, or is it just that Israel gets a free pass?
People who would dance in our streets after a horrific, epoch event; would choose a date to commit such horror, from something as simple as a “theory” in a book.
Dont forget about the Israeli art students in the WTC’s also and the Mossad/IDF members who were caught by firefighters and cops trying to detonate vans (with murals of planes crashing into the wtc) full of explosives on the bridge and on king street 6th and 7th
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by John McCormack , Veterans Today. Veterans Today said: New post: Release of the ‘Dancing Israelis’, Coincidence or Blackmail? http://bit.ly/c9mJph [...]
Most people aware of the Dancing Israelis don’t know these deranged terrorists were going to blow up the George Washington Bridge. This article provides interesting information on the repairs made to the bridge.
Perhaps the best article on the Dancing Israelis is http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/fiveisraelis.html
The article also gives details regarding the Dancing Israelis and the George Washington Bridge.
The Dancing Israelis are preparing a dance routine for a Mossad nuclear attack on the United States. They’re going to give us a sneak preview on the next Dancing With the Stars Episode.
An interesting theory, Israel blew up flight 587 to pressure the American government to release the Dancing Israelis. However, it may not have been necessary since the ardent Zionist Chertoff was running the 911 investigations and ordered the release of the Dancing Israelis. Some people suggest the order initially came from the Whitehouse.
The Zionists in the Whitehouse could have easily persuaded the clueless George Bush or Cheney to release the Dancing Israelis. However the timing of the plane crash with the release of the Dancing Israelis along with the facts suggesting espionage and the US government not wanting to appear to the public as being controlled by terrorists makes an interesting situation the Mossad could use to their advantage.
Also, I don’t think Israelis were placing the blame for the crash on Al-Qaeda which makes the Israeli blackmail scenario more likely. Will have to wait for the next tell all book by a Mossad agent.
No “intelligence connections” but I never had any doubts THEY were responsible for that air crash————yes the jews; You may have not done it Hyman in Skokie, but your tribal leaders did!
Mike
Also, the 911 mural van that exploded that day.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WRWQxlnZQj4
I have got to express my opinion on the ‘painting’ of all jews, particularly in the United States. My mother (may she rest in peace) was a Jew, her family migrated from Russia in the late 1800′s. She was an amazing woman. Her mother died when she was a young woman at the age of 20 and her father left the family. She raised two sisters and a brother while working. She taught about discrimination and religious hatred. She marched in the streets of New York City
for the Woman’s right to vote and joined the U.S. Army during WWII to fight against Hitler. She met my father, an army veteran whom had landed with the Normandy Invasion of Europe. He survived to marry my mother and they raised a
beautiful family in this Great Country. I understand that Israel was a way for the ‘powers that be’ to establish a foothold in the middle east to control that part of the world and their resources. Unfortunately for the Palestinians. The other surrounding countries capitulated after extreme pressure from England and the U.S. and others. Now, the Israeli’s, rather than bring the Palestinians into participation in the countries affairs, have isolated the people in a living prison and slowly confiscated their land. They run a system of Apatheid similar to how South Africa was run and previously similar to how the United States tried to seperate a particular race from participating in their country. In either case it did not work and it wont work for the Israelis. The Israeli military and the Mossad has been involved in many false false flag attacks on our country. We are all waking up to the fact that they demolished the World Trade Towers and not to mention the U.S. Liberty. In conjunction with the Neocons, U.S. citisens and others (many dual citisens) they have declared war on our system government and our land. These so called leaders, such as Cheney, Chertoff, Perle, Wolfowitz, Silverstein and others too numerous to mention whom have been involved and facilitated the coverup. They all will be brought to justice. There are no statute of limitations on murder. In summary, there are many jews whom have served this country and they do not deserved to lumped in or compared with the sinister Neocons, Israeli’s or other groups intent on destroying this country and its people. Thank You, Doug, A/E 911 Truth, VFP
Well done.
Dear Doug, I would say your mother was a typical jew as were my ancestors who were jews. Mostly decent people who work hard, obey the law, do their best and try to treat everyone decent if they aren’t able to go further and help others.
So why did Alan Sabrosky say most jews are more loyal to isreale than the USA? I happen to agree with Sabrosky and it makes my blood boil at the thought of America fighting and paying for a three trillion dollar war for israel in addition to the unending gifts to them and payoffs to their endless enemies.
Perhaps that is why some jews throw their membership to the tribe overboard, never to return? My uncle raised Othodox became a Christian with no fanfare or formality in the spirit of Jesus Christ himself at least in the way I understand Christ.
Nevertheless it turns out there is a “holy” book called the talmud which authorizes all kinds of horrible treatment and racist attitudes towards the goyim (everyone else). So gentiles feel as though they have been “gamed” by jews who are known to stick together and low and behold they find this is all advocated in the jewish “Holy” book———-and we are even talking murder here!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!????????????????????
So are all those gentiles supposed to be trusting of the jews?? And when you see them collaborating as a small group to control a nation of 350 million for their own selfish purposes??? A situation has been created here where a gentile who head isn’t stuck up his A_s to wonder why America is being ruin for a small group of jews?????? So Hymie down the street is a “good” Jew???? He probably is! But does he take joy in knowing he a jew and a small group of jews run the USA like it is their personal little plantation———-NO ONE IS ALLOWED TO CRITICIZE THEM —CRITICIZE ANYBODY BUT DON’T CRITICIZE A JEW. JEWS ARE SUCKING THE LIFEBLOOD OUT OF AMERICA AND GENTILES ARE NOT SUPPOSED TO BE UPSET WITH JEWS IN GENERAL???
DOUG, I THINK YOU NEED TO COME UP WITH YOU OWN ANSWERS HERE AND PLEASE SHARE THEM WITH US SUPPOSED “antisemites” instead of blaming us for the problem.
It seems to me the antigentilism egg came before the antisemitism chicken.
Furthermore despite a great offense by the leaders of the Tribe, I think the number of gentiles who hate jews and or jews in general is unger 1/2 of one percent.
I DO HATE WARS FOUGHT AND PAID FOR BY AMERICANS FOR ISRAEL AND A SMALL MINORITY RUNNING THE USA FOR THEIR SELFISH INTERESTS.
MIKE
‘
T
Doug, You say:
“I understand that Israel was a way for the ‘powers that be’ to establish a foothold in the middle east to control that part of the world and their resources”
No Doug, that may be your opinion but is not a fact. A lot israel shills like to assert that, incorrectly in my opinion. israel became israel because zionist jews wanted a home base for their operations.
It was a theory used by jews to gain the support of the USA. Some dumb Americans bought into that theory no doubt and it has been used for a long time to justify America pumping its life blood to israel to the detriment of Americans who could care less about israel.
You need to study history more extensively.
By the way, if jews asked you to do favors for Israel would you? (because your mother was jewish?). For instance if you were a policeman, would you improperly use the government to look up info for a person who told you it was “for the good of israel”? Life is not nearly as simple as you seem to imply.
Read Norman Finkelstein who IS jewish. He said “the animus (hatred) of the jews is not irrational, meaning at some point they did something which brought on the hated of others—–it did not come out of the clear blue for no understandable reason.
You might study a little deeper. Other jews say Finkestein says such things because he “hates himself”. That does not make sense to me . Does it make sense to you?
Mike
Why does Israel continue to get away with murdering their “friends” and supposed allies?
David Duke asks the question: “What is the only government in the Mideast that made terrorists attacks against American?” The answer is Israel!
The attack on the USS Liberty should have been reason enough to declare of war on Israel. Prior to that, it was the Lavon Affair that was buried by the media.
Wake up, Americans! Do you want to be the Zionist’s next victim?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hVgXv4yrepY&feature=related
Here’s an article published on Oct 25, 2009 by Alan Sabrosky, US Army War College (Retired) on his website: Zionism Stinks. Suter was involved with the Urban Moving Company vans, and appears to be in the same business in NJ now. Photos of documents related to a cleaning business are also shown on the website.
Suter’s Back in Town – 9-11′s Dancing Israeli Dominik Suter is Alive and Well and Living in New Jersey? (with updates)
http://mybigfatanti-zionistlife.blogspot.com/2009/10/suters-back-in-town-9-11-dancing.html
I read over a year ago that the Airbus planes may have remote-control built into their systems. Quantas is having lots of problems with them at this time, and will switch out 40 engines. Here’s hoping the new engines don’t come with the same remote controls.
>>> which itself would have been achieved by detonating a prepared coat of micro-thermite around the cables,… <<<
Maybe someone should go check it out. The bridge is still there.
Rex,
The article said if I read it correctly, said that they came back and possibly removed the thermite in 2007 to destroy the evidence on the bridge.
Regarding the whole issue of thermite, I first read about one of the methods possibly used to place the termite in the Trade Center complex—- was to apply it as a paint, which even the workers applying it would think at worst was special paint——-in a Christopher Bollyn article.
That made perfect sense to me and I have little doubt that is exactly how it was done. Bollyn suggested it was probably applied to the underside of the galvanized steel decking which is placed to support the concrete poured on top of it, to make each floor. The underneath of the steel decking is easily exposed my removing the typical “suspended ceiling” tiles in any modern steel building. The workers were probably told they were applying a fireproof coating as part of an asbestos abatement and fireproofing project.
One thing Bollyn didn’t mention was that concrete itself is an explosive—–when it comes in contact with molten metal which exothermics creates in its reaction; as it at the same time melts the steel it is in contact with (the steel decking). This is an ever present problem in steel mills and foundries when molten metal is accidentally spilled on concrete floors ——the concrete floor explodes in dust. A lot of people don’t realize that “dried” concrete is not “dried” at all but merely hardened by chemical reaction
and the hardened concreted still consists of a high percentage of water. The heat of molten metal on hardened concrete causes the water to expand rapidly thus breaking the concrete into fine particles, thoroughly and throughout, resulting in dust and an explosion.
In this regard, Bollyn did not discuss the explodabilty of concrete upon contact with molten metal.
Much talk has been made of how the millions of tons of concrete pulverized into a fine dust on 911 and some have even suggested only the use of “party nukes” (military & intelligence term for mini/micro nukes) when exploding concrete by itself could explain the pulverization. The fact is the towers were essentially all steel buildings where most, if not all the concrete used in the building was in the poured concrete floors, probably only four inches thick.
So essentially all the concrete in the towers could have been turned into fine dust in a moment by the exothermic coating, exothermic reaction, and melting of the galvanized steel decking, on the undersides of all the floors of the World Trade towers one and two, and the explosion of the concrete in the floors.
In other words as the exothermic reaction took place, molten metal (iron) would have resulted from the exothermic reaction which at the same instant would have melted the galanized steel decking, which in turn would have resulted in molten metal being in direct contact with concrete which would within milliseconds explode, just as the steel decking turned to molten metal and essentially disappeared in a rain of molten metal under the concrete.
So while “party nukes” still may have been used in (possibly the basements) of buildings One and Two, the exotermic reaction of the coating, the melting of the steel decking on the undersides of the concrete floors, and the explosion of the concrete floors themselves is more than enough to totally explain the pulverization of all the concrete in the two buildings.
The red or black iron oxide in the paint would have given the coating a nice red or black color, like any
rust preventative paint with the aluminum dust (secret ingrediant) would not have been noticed. In fact, this were the case, high tech “nano thermites” as suggested by Bollyn may not have been necessary. Iron oxide dust in huge quantities is available in almost any steel mill where the steel is shot blasted before cold drawing or rolling.
Mike
Reese,
Good overview and synthesis of the problem and its various facets.
Mike
There are certainly some irregularities on the operation of the site. My comments would not appear no matter what I did and I assumed with no doubt Gordon blocked me, but I now believe his assurance he did not.
Mike