LISTEN VT RADIO | JOIN TEAM VT | SIGN-UP DAILY NEWSLETTER
VETERANS TODAY ON : FACEBOOK | TWITTER | VT FORUM
|

RICHARD EDMONDSON: THE TEA PARTY’S EMERGING ZIONIST FACE

The Tea Party’s Emerging Zionist Face

From sounding warnings about ‘terror babies’ to deploring human sympathy for ‘underdogs,’ the Tea Party lurches into Zionist ideology

By Richard Edmondson for Veterans Today

When the Tea Party appeared as a national phenomenon early in 2009, the chief preoccupation was with domestic matters, its disparate groups and members rallying around such traditionally conservative concerns as big government, “socialized medicine,” and the like. There was a strong populist streak (or at least that’s how the media portrayed it), and outrage was expressed over Obama’s multi-billion dollar stimulus package, along with genuinely-felt sentiments, put forth here and there, that Washington was “bailing out Wall Street at the expense of Main Street.” Concerns over foreign policy, the nation’s wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, seemed to take a backseat, and certainly there were few, if any, calls for a new war in Iran or solidifying relations with the state of Israel.

By mid 2010, however, this had changed dramatically. On July 21, several Capitol Hill Republicans, including Michelle Bachman of Minnesota and Louis Gohmert of Texas, held a press conference announcing formation of a Congressional Tea Party Caucus, and almost immediately thereafter caucus members sponsored a resolution “explicitly endorsing Israel’s right to strike Iran’s nuclear program,” as one report put it. Now the TP appears on the brink of an even further lurch into Zionist ideology in the form of a soon-to-be-released book, Underdogma, currently being hailed as “the first great Tea Party book.” The author is Michael Prell, a member of the Tea Party Patriots (TPP), and the book has been endorsed by Bachman, Zionist neocons Daniel Pipes and Frank Gaffney, as well as by TPP cofounder and national coordinator Jenny Beth Martin. Additional praise has also been garnered from former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, who lauds Prell for explaining “how the Left masks anti-Americanism and anti-Western sentiment behind the American tradition of rooting for the underdog and how we can fight back against their rhetoric by reviving the American spirit of our founding fathers that transformed us from the ‘underdog’ to the greatest country on earth.”

Underdogma’s subtitle is “How America’s Enemies Use Our Love for the Underdog to Trash American Power,” and if that’s not explicit enough for you, Prell outlines his basic thesis in a series of articles that can be found here. “From Christ’s blessed meek to Eli Manning to rock-throwing Palestinians; people tend to side with the little guy,” he writes. (1) Sympathy for the underdog is part of the American character, stemming, in Prell’s view, from our “formative experiences” in childhood upon finding ourselves under the power of teachers, parents, school-yard bullies, etc. These childhood experiences give rise later in life to a “reflexive belief” that those in the world with little or no power “are automatically deemed virtuous and noble,” while persons or entities with larger or greater power “are to be scorned—simply because they have more power.” (2) The name he gives to this axiom is “underdogma.” While the ability to feel sympathy for the oppressed would, for many of us, seem among humanity’s more noble traits, in Prell’s view it’s in reality “the polar opposite of the American spirit.” And furthermore, he assures us, this tendency poses a manifest threat to the nation.

Given the Palestinians are perhaps the world’s premiere underdogs at present, it doesn’t take much imagination to figure out whose political goals are being advanced here. But for those TP members not especially apt at connecting dots, Prell obligingly spells out, at least in his essays, whose side he’s on. Here he defines “Islamists” as our “sworn enemies,” (3) while at the same time harshly berating Obama for his attempts at stopping Israeli settlement building (attempts which, of course, were pathetically weak and ultimately unsuccessful). “Why is it that when Israelis build homes in Israel, they invite scorn from President Obama, and when Palestinians build homes—or even rockets—they find themselves with Barack Obama’s unwavering support?” Prell asks disingenuously. (4)

A Short History

Much like WikiLeaks, the TP has had lavish amounts of mainstream media publicity heaped upon it, literally saturation-levels of coverage, which have turned the words “tea party” into a household word in America. To such an extent has this been the case, it’s almost hard to believe now that a mere two years ago the movement didn’t even exist. The TP’s birth can be traced back to February 19, 2009 and an on-air tirade by CNBC business editor Rick Santelli, although some sources credit blogger Keli Carender with having actually organized the first tea-party-like protests earlier that same month in Seattle. In either event, the cause of concern, for both Santelli and Carender, was Obama’s $787 billion stimulus package. While Carender seems to have had some reservations over bank bailouts, for Santelli the main affront clearly was the expending of taxpayer dollars to help beleaguered homeowners, whom he referred to as “losers,” avoid foreclosure. In his rant, delivered from the floor of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, Santelli accused the government of “promoting bad behavior” and went on to confide to CNBC viewers, “We’re thinking of having a Chicago tea party in July.”

It didn’t take quite until July, however, for the first official “tea party” to be held. On February 27 protests sprung up in at least eight states plus the District of Columbia, while on April 15—tax day—events in multiple cities, from California to Massachusetts, drew tens of thousands or perhaps more. Things continued to simmer throughout the year, with a series of “Obamacare” protests spiking especially in the month of August. Then in February of 2010, the TP held its first national convention, in Nashville, with Sarah Palin delivering the keynote address while wearing an American/Israeli flag pin. “America is ready for another revolution and you’re a part of this,” she told the cheering crowd.

Molding a public image

On February 27, 2010, the New York Times featured a story on blogger Carender, the occasion being the anniversary of the first multi-state TP protests of a year earlier. “You would probably not think of her as the Tea Party type,” said the Times, describing the Seattle math teacher as a member of the Young Republicans although one who “has a pierced nose, performs improv on the weekends, and lives here (Seattle) in a neighborhood with more Mexican grocers than coffeehouses.” (5) The story includes a photo of Carender being interviewed by the media, as well as a quote from TPP national coordinator Jenny Beth Martin, who, in the Times words viewed, the young woman as…

an unlikely avatar of the movement but an ideal one. She puts a fresh, idealistic face on a movement often dismissed as a bunch of angry extremists.

“She’s not your typical conservative,” she (Martin) said. “She’s an actress. She’s got a nose ring. I think it’s the thing that’s so amazing about our movement.” (6)

It seems to be part of an overall effort to reshape and remold the TP’s image into something more inclusive, something beyond the stereotypical white-conservative demographic. This effort was on display at the July 21 Capitol Hill press conference, an event which included both black and Hispanic faces and was reported by Fox News as having shown off “the racial and ethnic diversity of the movement,” (7) and it was also evident in a response by the National Tea Party Federation (NTPF) to accusations of racism leveled by the NAACP. “The…(NTPF) today flatly rejected the NAACP’s unfounded accusations that condemn ‘racist elements’ in the tea party movement,” the group said in a July 14 statement. A separate statement issued the same day quoted a number of black conservatives, such as Frantz Kebreau of the NAACPC (“National Association for the Advancement of Conservative People of all Colors”), speaking in the TP’s defense. (8)

The accusations of racism stemmed from racial epithets that were allegedly hurled at Congressional Black Caucus members passing by a TP “Code Red Healthcare Rally” at the capitol in March. In an April letter to Congresswoman Barbara Lee, the NTPF stated its view that “racism and hate speech have no place in civil political discourse and debate,” and promised swift action should any TP member be found to have engaged in such. On July 17 it seemed to make good on its promise when it voted to expel the Tea Party Express as one of its member organizations over racist remarks attributed to member Mark Williams. (9) Williams, one of the leaders in the Ground Zero mosque protests, reportedly posted on his blog a satirical letter praising slavery, a missive supposed to have been written by “Colored People” and sent to President Abraham Lincoln. Williams is also said to have called Obama an “Indonesian Muslim turned welfare thug” and referred to Manhattan Borough President Scott Stringer, who supported the mosque construction, as “a Jewish Uncle Tom who would have turned rat on Anne Frank.” (10)

Like the NTPF and the newly-formed TP Congressional Caucus, Prell, too, seems to be doing a bit of outreach to a more broad-minded, enlightened audience. In what appears to be an appeal to the gay community, he reports in one of his essays that Palestinians “outlaw and execute homosexuals,” (11) then turns around, in a separate article, with an appeal to mainstream Christians wherein he discusses efforts to “eliminate Christmas from America’s town squares.” (12) How successful all this will be remains to be seen. It does seem to be a bit of a delicate high wire act, made all the more complicated by the fact that so far membership of the TP Congressional Caucus is entirely Republican (see the complete list here), although given the wind in the TP’s sails provided by the mainstream media, it would probably be unwise to dismiss these rebranding efforts as futile or unlikely.

Dick Armey and Freedom Works

Besides the aforementioned caucus members, another “leading voice of the Tea Party movement” is former House majority leader Dick Armey, who in 1994 helped Gingrich draft the “Contract with America.” Since leaving the House, Armey has worked as a consultant and currently heads the organization Freedom Works, a Washington D.C.-based nonprofit which, according to its website, “recruits, educates, trains, and mobilizes millions of volunteer activists to fight for less government, lower taxes, and more freedom.” Whether the claim of “millions” is reliable or not, there does indeed seem to be a training program of some sort, as the New York Times story on Carender reported:

Ms. Carender’s first rally drew only 120 people. A week later, she had 300, and six weeks later, 1,200 people gathered for a Tax Day Tea Party. Last month, she was among about 60 Tea Party leaders flown to Washington to be trained in election activism by Freedom Works, the conservative advocacy organization led by Dick Armey, the former House Republican leader. (13)

In addition to running his apparently well-funded nonprofit, Armey is also the author, along with Matt Kibbe, of Give Us Liberty: A Tea Party Manifesto, described by one reviewer on Amazon as a “perfect recruiting tool.” The book was released in August 2010, however, in 2002, when he was still in Congress, Armey issued a somewhat different manifesto—not in defense of liberty, but of Israel. On May 1 that year (May Day ironically) Armey, in an interview on Hardball with Chris Matthews, essentially called for what would amount to the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians from the Occupied Territories. “I am content to have Israel occupy that land that it now occupies and to have those people who have been aggressors against Israel retired to some other arena, and I would be happy to have them make a home. I would be happy to have all of these Arab nations that have been so hell bent to drive Israel out of the Middle East to get together, find some land and make a home for the Palestinians. I think it can be done,” he said. Matthews’ response was somewhat combative (see here for a transcript of the exchange), as he pointed out that what Armey was advocating was sharply at variance with official U.S. policy. Somewhat combative was about as far as it went, however. Matthews evidently did not view the remarks offensive enough to warrant charging his guest with racism, although we can imagine the reaction might have been different had Armey called for the expulsion of Jews rather than Palestinians. Not only would the congressman have been excoriated on Hardball, he likely would have gone on to suffer a Helen Thomas-like fate in his public life.

In June of 2002, roughly a month after Armey’s comments on Hardball, Israel began construction on the wall which today, the world over, has become an iconic symbol of twenty-first century apartheid. (14) No word on whether Armey has been disavowed or repudiated by the NTPF.

Louie Gohmert and ‘terror babies’

Texas Republican Congressman and TP Caucus member Louis Gohmert made a splash last summer when he began touting the theory that Muslim women were entering the U.S. for the purpose of having babies—thereby gaining citizenship status for their offspring. The babies, as the theory goes, would then grow up, undergo terrorist training, and return to America for the purpose of carrying out attacks. “It is happening, it is happening, it is happening,” Gohmert proclaimed in a CNN interview with Anderson Cooper, though without offering evidence.

“Where? Give me some evidence. Tell me one person, one terror baby that’s been born. Can you tell me?” responded Cooper.

“The explosions will not happen for 10, 15, 20 years, and then you will be one of those blips. I’m not comparable to Winston Churchill, but the detractors like you are comparable to his detractors,” Gohmert replied angrily, comparing Cooper to Jon Stewart and accusing him of having “fun” at his expense. (15)

The interview is thought to have been discrediting to Gohmert, particularly in light of comments by Janet Napolitano and a former FBI official denying existence of evidence pointing to “terror baby” plots against America. Nonetheless, Gohmert still remains a popular figure. A poll of TP participants in December found 70 percent supporting him over Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio to head up the Republican Study Committee. (16) Despite TP support, however, the House leadership gave the job to Jordan—possibly out of concerns over Gohmert’s mental stability. As Erik Erickson wrote on RedState.com, “I like Louie Gohmert, but between he and Jim Jordan, I trust Jim to be a fully competent conservative trench fighter who will never go off the reservation about terror babies in embarrassing fashion—let alone be asked about it.” (17)

Wars and rumors of wars

Quite clearly Gohmert, along with Williams and the Tea Party Express, are idiosyncrasies of the movement that some would probably just as soon sweep under the rug. By contrast, however, the Tea Party Patriots is one of the more image-savvy TP groups around, its national coordinator, Jenny Beth Martin, last year being included among the 2010 Time 100, a list of “people who most affect our world” published each year by Time Magazine. “Every revolution needs icons,” Time wrote in its tribute to Martin. “The Tea Party movement may have mushroomed because of its reluctance to anoint a leader, but leaders have emerged nonetheless. In February 2009, Jenny Beth Martin was one of about 20 people who took part in the original conference call (convened via Twitter hashtag) in response to Rick Santelli’s now famous rant. Her commitment to building the burgeoning movement has made her one of its breakout stars.” (18)

On its website, the TPP defines fiscal responsibility, constitutionally limited government, and free markets as its “core values.” What the organization’s official position on relations with Israel might be, or even the ongoing wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, are largely a matter of conjecture, however. Martin did not respond to requests for comments for this article. Her TPP compatriot, however, does seem to have a distinct soft spot in his heart for the Zionist state. Prell’s book is not scheduled for release until February 1 (a release presumably being timed to take advantage of the TP’s second anniversary), so any conclusive summary of its subject matter would have to wait until then. However, in an essay entitled “Why Palestinians?”, posted November 13, 2010, Prell confides it was precisely the struggle between Israel and Palestine which led him to a five year investigation of the “belief system” he now calls “underdogma.” It is a confession prefaced initially with a series of rhetorical questions—questions Prell loads with a number of emotional triggers:

Is there something about the culture, beliefs, or actions of Palestinians that resonates deep within the heart of President Obama? Is it the fact that Palestinians incite hatred and violence toward other cultures, calling them “descendants of monkeys and pigs”? Or is it because their school curricula and TV cartoons teach children to kill innocent people, leading 72% of school-aged Palestinians to say they aspire to be martyrs? Or is it the fact that they outlaw and execute homosexuals? Or is it the fact that they subjugate women and then “honor kill” them for the “dishonor” of being raped?

Why would anyone support anyone who does such things? And why have millions of people around the world—from university campuses to the United Nations to the White House—joined together to make “Palestinians the largest per capita recipients of international development assistance in the world”? (19)

After posing his prosecutorial questions, Prell then goes on to reveal, “Five years ago, I set out to answer these questions. What I discovered was a belief system that has implications far beyond East Jerusalem.” Indeed. Prell’s animosity doesn’t stop with the Palestinians, but makes a horizontal trajectory outward seemingly to include the entire Muslim world, or at any rate “radical Islamists.”

What is the common thread? Reflexive opposition to power and automatic support for the underdog—even when those underdogs fly planes into buildings, bury homosexuals up to their necks and stone them to death…and use child suicide bombers to kill innocent civilians. (20)

Underdogma, he says, is an “axis of power” that has transcended traditional divides between right and left, one that can be detected even outside the political realm—in areas such as sports, or the public trials and tribulations of celebrities. But the main threat of this dangerous “belief system” is its ability to shape people’s political ideologies:

Underdogma is all around us. It is at play in virtually every corner of our lives. And, while the Western world increasingly exalts the meek and apologizes for its own power, the self-described enemies of the West—radical Islamists—are operating under a fundamentally different and structurally more potent belief system.

Our sworn enemies operate under no such delusions. To the Islamists; (sic) strength and power are lauded, while any sign of weakness is not simply frowned upon—it is considered an open provocation for violent attack…

What they know, and what we must learn, is that the West’s empathy for the underdog—leading some in the West to tolerate, excuse and even celebrate the violent actions of Islamic terrorists—is viewed by these Islamists as despicable weakness and clear justification—and even provocation—for violent jihad against the very underdogmatists who stand up for them. (21)

It’s probably a safe bet that the only “despicable weakness” in America, as perceived by vast numbers of people in the Middle East, is its weakness in standing up to the Israeli lobby. Nonetheless, Prell goes on to conclude that America “was founded on a pioneer spirit of achievement and a belief in American Exceptionalism (sic),” and he issues a warning that “further thralldom to underdogma is suicidal” and that “compassion should never involve self-destruction.” (22)

Interestingly, Prell’s bio, as listed on the website of his publisher, BenBella Books, cites connections to the current prime minister of Israel among others. “Michael Prell has written for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper, and hundreds of politicians on three continents. His specialty is starting, shifting, and amplifying national debates,” reads the bio, which additionally goes on to mention the author’s previous work with the Dalai Lama, the global Chinese dissident community, “America’s Rabbi” Shmuley Boteach, and the Jewish Values Network. He also apparently is a winner of the “Pollie Award” given out each year by the American Association of Political Consultants—a prize described as “the Academy Award of political advertising.”

While we may not know Martin’s views on war in the Middle East, we do know her thoughts on her Patriot-compatriot’s forthcoming book since they are given on the TPP website: “Underdogma,” she says, “is the first great Tea Party book. All Tea Party Patriots should read Underdogma.” As for Dick Armey, whatever he is teaching the “millions” of young conservative activists taking his “training” courses, one may probably safely conclude it’s not peace with Muslims. And what of Carender? Like other TPers, the young Seattle woman, who blogs under the name “Liberty Belle,” seems to be a partisan supporter of Israel. Last June, after the Helen Thomas controversy erupted, Liberty Belle’s blog featured a post entitled, “Disgusting: Jew-hater of the day, Helen Thomas.” The post included the embedded video of Thomas’ exchange with the New York rabbi that resulted in her resignation from United Press International. Underneath it, Liberty Belle comments, “I might have to make this a daily feature if all the Jew-hating Americans keep showing their true colors so openly. It’s time to call these people out and let them know their hatred is not welcome in the United States of America.” (23)

Liberty Belle also includes on her blogroll a link to Front Page Magazine, the hawkish website edited by David Horowitz, which spotlights a section called “Jihad Watch.” And for Horowitz, apparently the esteem is mutual. FPM recently named the TP its “Person of the Year,” a tribute in which it asserted that the movement has “wrought tremendous change over the political landscape” and has revitalized “the American zeitgeist.” It also informs us that “the rancid reaction of the Left to the Tea Party is well known and not worth treatment here.” What is provided, however, are some statistics about TP members that are perhaps important to note:

Members are predominately Republican voters, many of whom are disaffected and work largely outside the GOP establishment. Only 54% of TP supporters had a favorable view of the Republican Party, according to an April 2010 New York Times/CBS News poll. Polls consistently show the movement’s single greatest unifying principle is fiscal conservatism, including a desire for a smaller government and a concern over the federal deficit. Social issues are mixed and far less uniform. According to the same poll, slightly more people favored civil unions for homosexuals compared to those who believed gay couples should receive no legal recognition (41% to 40%) and 45% are pro-choice (believing abortion should be available, but with restrictions), while only 35% believe abortion should not be available. (24)

There are probably any number of ways to interpret these stats, though one way could be that more than half of the American Right lies even farther out on the political spectrum than the standard Republican Party line. At the same time, however, the figures on views towards gay marriage could well suggest that Prell’s presumed efforts to reach out to that segment of American society are not without some reasonable chances of success.

Conclusion to part 1

While Americans are justifiably upset at the current state of affairs in their country, a great deal of confusion reigns as to the exact nature of the problems, their causes, and potential solutions. This is not coincidental. Such pervasive confusion exists largely thanks to the mainstream media, whose role, as ever, is to keep the populace frightened and misinformed, this while setting up straw man villains and carefully concealing where the true centers of power lie. If the TP is to be viewed as a media creation, which for the most part it seems to be, the question would then occur as to what purpose. What was its intended function? At the outset, as people grew captivated by the hoopla, its main role seemed to be taking the anger in America—which at the moment is very deep, very palpable, and near pandemic proportions—along with the perennial desire for change, and channeling these vertiginous emotions into a relatively safe, sandbox-type outlet. At some point, however, the ends began to evolve and mutate…as ends often do in the presence of human creativity. Currently as the clock seemingly ticks towards 2 a.m.—as the rhetoric heats up and the storm clouds gather over the Persian Gulf yet again—the “party,” as it were, appears to have taken a more sinister direction, with an advocacy of war becoming one of its defining characteristics.

Richard Edmondson is the author of The Memoirs of Saint John: No Greater Love, available on Amazon. Visit his website at www.memoirsofsaintjohn.com. He also maintains a blog at www.leftwing-christian.net.

  1. Michael Prell, “America’s enduring love for underdogs,” American Thinker, Feb. 6, 2008, http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/02/americas_enduring_love_for_und.html
  1. Ibid.
  1. Prell, “Underdogma,” American Thinker, Dec. 14, 2007, http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/12/underdogma.html
  1. Prell, “Why Palestinians?” American Thinker, Nov. 13, 2010, http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/11/why_palestinians.html
  1. Kate Zernike, “An unlikely activist who got to the tea party early,” New York Times, Feb. 27, 2010, http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/28/us/politics/28keli.html?_r=2
  1. Ibid.
  1. “Congressional Tea Party Caucus kicks off with a display of racial unity,” Fox News, July 21, 2010, http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/07/21/tea-party-caucus-kicks-racial-unity/
  1. National Tea Party Federation website, “press room” page, http://www.thenationalteapartyfederation.com/press_room.html
  1. Ibid.

10.  Helen Kennedy, “Tea Party Express leader Mark Williams kicked out over ‘colored people’ letter,’” New York Daily News, July 18, 2010, http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/2010/07/18/2010-07-18_tea_party_express_leader_mark_williams_expelled_over_colored_people_letter.html

11.  Prell, “Underdogma,” http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/12/underdogma.html

12.  Michael Prell, “Merry Christmas,” The Daily Caller, Dec. 7, 2010, http://dailycaller.com/2010/12/07/merry-christmas/#ixzz17SuAlIdD

13.  Zernike, “Unlikely Activist…” http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/28/us/politics/28keli.html?_r=2

14.  PalestineHistory.com, http://www.palestinehistory.com/issues/wall/wallfacts.htm

15.  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQVfQCpYocQ

16.  Stephanie Mencimer, “Louie ‘Terror Babies’ Gohmert: Tea Party pick for House leadership,” Mother Jones, Dec. 8, 2010. http://motherjones.com/politics/2010/12/louie-gohmert-tea-party-republican-study-committee

17.  Erik Erickson, “Just say no to Louie Gohmert’s write-in bid,” Red State, Dec. 1, 2010, http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/12/01/just-say-no-to-louie-gohmerts-write-in-bid/

18.  “Jenny Beth Martin,” Time, April 29, 2010, http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1984685_1984864_1985462,00.html

19.  Prell, “Why Palestinians?” http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/11/why_palestinians.html

20.  Prell, “Underdogma,” http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/12/underdogma.html

21.  Ibid.

22.  Ibid.

23.  Redistributing Knowledge blog site, http://redistributingknowledge.blogspot.com/2010/06/disgusting-jew-hater-of-day-helen.html

24.  Front Page Magazine, Dec. 31, 2010, http://frontpagemag.com/2010/12/31/frontpages-person-of-the-year-the-tea-party-movement/

Short URL: http://www.veteranstoday.com/?p=71755

The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT or any other VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors or partners. Legal Notice

Posted by on Jan 7 2011, With 0 Reads, Filed under Israel, World. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
Apply for Your VA Home Loan Now Apply for VA Loan Now Education Get Educated at Excelsior College Get Educated at Excelsior College Get Your Loan Now Get Your Loan Now Get Your Loan Now Apply for your VA Home Loan Now Apply for your VA Home Loan Now Apply for your VA Home Loan Now Apply for Jobs on HireVeterans.com Now Apply for Jobs on HireVeterans.com Now Apply for Jobs on HireVeterans.com Now

COMMENTS

To post, we ask that you login using Facebook, Yahoo, AOL, or Hotmail in the box below.
Don't have a social network account? Register and Login direct with VT and post.
Before you post, read our Comment Policy - Feedback


47 Comments for “RICHARD EDMONDSON: THE TEA PARTY’S EMERGING ZIONIST FACE”

  1. [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Elvis Winehouse and others. Elvis Winehouse said: RT @veteranstoday: Post Edited: RICHARD EDMONDSON: THE TEA PARTY'S EMERGING ZIONIST FACE http://bit.ly/eiwkBp [...]

  2. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0096256/

    They Live

    A drifter discovers a pair of sunglasses that allow him to wake up to the fact that aliens have taken over the Earth.

  3. THE ISRAELI TEA PARTY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  4. The history of the Tea Party provided in the article is not correct in regards to its early formation.

    The first mention of “Tea Party” was by supporters of Ron Paul for president.

    Ron Paul supporters used the “Tea Party” name to help identify the political spirit that animated their support for Ron Paul’s candidacy and what it stood for.

    Ron Paul is against the perpetual war ideology of the Neocons.

    What is true is that the Neocons are strongly attempting to co-opt the Tea Party movement and as the article describes has been successful WITH members of Congress (for a very long time), but not necessarily with rank-and-file Tea Party supporters.

    The Tea Party movement, as opposed to members of Congress, are up for grabs. But as is typical for supporters of the Israeli Government, they have out-organized those opposed to giving the Israeli Government a blank check.

    Yes, the fact that many if not most Tea Party’ers watch FOX News cable channel has given the pro-Israeli Government types a big head-start.

    Obviously, it’s very important to keep criticism focussed on the Israeli Government’s policies, as opposed to blanket criticism of “Jews” as this is easily labelled “anti-semitism” and will play into the hands of Zionists.

    The reason for the book is because there is fear among Israeli Government policy supporters that the Tea Party could be turned away from “blank check” support of Israeli Government policies.

    It’s up to the people who don’t want the Tea Party movement to be fully co-opted by Israeli First types to explain why the interests of America and Israel’s Government are not the same and, in fact, it hurts America’s National Interest to give “blank check” support for Israeli Government policies in the Middle East.

    Point out the fact that the Israeli Government is not acting in good faith in the peace negotiations with the Palistinians and that opposition to expanding settlements in occupied Palistinian territory has been U.S. policy for decades, and so on…

    But for goodness sakes, don’t throw in the towel on the Tea Party and then sit back and complain…that will never work to change the Congress criters support for Israeli Government policies.

    Only grass roots opposition will change attitudes in Congress… and, at this point, the Tea Party is the only “grass roots” out there in the American heartland.

    • Thanks for your thoughtful corrections. My one experience was with a TP tax day rally in New Haven, Ct where a bunch of grannies and gramps, for the most part, were picnicking with folding chairs and coolers of food. There were also many ethnic food trucks along the street which drew more attention than the speakers, who were mostly Ct politicians, and fair enough about that. One alarming aspect, however, was that a Jewish fellow took to the podium, talking like a carnival hustler, and completely misrepresented the purpose of the TP, talking about the Republican and neocon agenda as if the TP were part of it. He got next to no attention and even less applause. A Sarah Palin impersonator arrived to canned fanfare and most people looked on in embarrassed disbelief at this condescending affront. There were also a handful of obvious mental patients off their meds wandering around. Across the road, a handful of fake leftist protesters held up posters accusing the TP of racism, probably paid for by the media hoping to fabricate a confrontation for dinnertime entertainment. I think maybe it’s time for Ron Paul supporters to distance themselves from any “official” Tea Party for the obvious reason that, if Sarah Palin’s part of it, or it’s supported by Dick Armey or Newt Gingrich no further proof is needed that it’s become a neocon front.

    • J.F.E.

      I think you are very correct when you say that the Tea Party rank and file members are “up for grabs” and when I write part 2 of this article I will do my best to emphasize that point. Most of the Tea Party people I know are pro-Israel, but it’s more of a knee-jerk reaction, based upon media conditioning, than any deep-seated conviction. I’ve found that when you talk to them about Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians they are capable of “getting it.”

      I apologize for not mentioning the Ron Paul supporters. I also did not mention the “tea party” protest organized by Trevor Leach on January 24 2009 in New York state as a response to state “obesity taxes.” However, most of the movement histories on the web list the “Santelli rant” as being sort of the match that lit the fuse.

  5. Sarah would still make the best good look’n president the USA has ever had. Much better look’n than Hilary :-)

    • So what,Sarah Palin looks good?She is controlled by Zionist jews and Israel,which makes her a traitor,UN-American,and a threat to National Security.Get your head out of your ass,and vote for the best PERSON who will protect America and it’s citizens.You want to play with your willy,do it some place other than the voting booth!!!Sarah Palin is one of the scores of satan’s spawn that is out to destroy America.

  6. Is–ra–hell occupies Palestine Land. they have occupied this Holy Land since 1948. This land belongs to the Palestines, ( NOT IS–RA–HELL. PERIOD ) THEY ARE THE ENEMY. this imbecile, stupid american government and the FANATIC imbecile tea party are MORONS. the zionist government knows that most of the idiot Tea Party and the Republicans will do anything they want them to do. infact they have got the stupid american government involved in two wars for over NINE YEARS NOW AND COUNTING. IS–RA–HELL will finish off America with the coming war with IRAN. The imbecile american population will get what they want. FINISH OFF OF WANT IS LEFT OF A ONCE SUPER POWER.

  7. It has become the KOSHER Tea Party…. ;-)

  8. Rick Santelli does say imflammatory things from time to time, but the context, if you watch CNBC, is always his being part of a discussion where the truth is overwhelmed by the Keynesian-government propagandist Steve Liesman, the shows hosts, and several other Wall Street shills attacking him at the same time. He’s cut off, ridiculed, and marginalized, so I imagine anyone might reflexively lash out without thinking from time to time. While his choice of “losers” was inappropriate, his point is well taken, unless his opponents would want their own unspeakable assumption aired, which is that blacks, and we’re talking about the sub-prime loans made to them in almost every instance, are so inferior that they’re incapable of knowing right from wrong, or comprehend their legal and financial obligations. African-Americans are not stupid and inferior, while that they are is precisely the presumption and justification motivating those who claim to speak in their name.

  9. This crap again?

    That is not the Tea Party.
    Aren’t writers at V.T. supposed to be smarter enough than to be manipulated by the main stream media?

    *rollseyes*

    This is the Tea Party:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DKZmIzEMUN8

    You are falling right into the trap they want you to by mis-identifying the Tea Party for the Neocon movement.

    You guys piss me off sometimes.

  10. “When the Tea Party appeared as a national phenomenon early in 2009″…

    No it appeared in 2007, get your damn facts straight.

  11. I’m pissed so I am going to say something here and I hope the writer of this mind fuck article reads it.

    Do you know who Edward Bernays is?
    He was Sigmund Freuds newphew, he’s the guy who got women to smoke.
    It was a classic psyop and well executed.
    He positioned a bunch of women in a large crowd and had them light a cigarette knowing everyone would see it. Almost overnight women started smoking.

    So the women who started smoking thought they picked it up from other women when in fact it was Edward Bernays…

    So now lets jump to the present………

    I’m the indi-social engineer that created the Tea Party. I think Gordon has been able to read between the lines I’ve posted here.

    It took me a year to do it.

    It has lost it’s way somewhat, but articles like this are so uninformed and quite frankly so self-destructive it makes me furious.

    You like most people, are totally unqualified to talk about this subject.
    You are allowing the MSM to dictate your research rather than having any true knowledge on this subject at all.

    The people at V.T. are the REAL Tea Partiers and you are shooting yourself in the foot by writing this unresearched garbage.

    Once again the little people are manipulated like cattle.
    You clearly have no idea how to get the Tea Party out of this mess, I DO!

    This article reminds me of a sports writer that never played the game he criticizes.

    The only people that even got close to understanding what the Tea Party is was Lyndon LaRouche and Scott Rasmussen.

    Now stop shitting on something you don’t understand at all.

    • If RICHARD EDMONDSON was smart ( and versed in this subject ) he would recognize that HE is the Tea Party, he would recognize that is ABANDONED his own movement and allowed the Neocons to infiltrate it, and he would fight to take the “Tea Party” brand back.

      But instead all he can do is discredit it.
      YOU HAVE FAILED

      Don’t be an intellectual/academic victim of the people your a allegedly fighting against.

      And look at the commentators here, they don’t know jack-shit except to quote you verbatim.

      You people have learned nothing.

      *rant off*

      • I created this thing.
        I have watched it since 2007.
        And I know way better than YOU do.
        This article is crap written by an intellectual victim.

        Sorry, I am just so pissed off by this you have no idea…

        • Does RICHARD EDMONDSON actually want to talk about this subject?
          The email I use here is fake.
          Drop a comment here and I’ll get back to you.

  12. Ron Paul,

    By my count you have posted six comments here, yet not a one of them mentions specifically what you found objectionable about the article. Is the fact that I didn’t mention the 2008 Ron Paul campaign the chief source of your anger? You say, “I’m the indi-social engineer that created the Tea Party.” That’s quite a feat, and if true, then I should definitely quote you as an expert in the next article, but I would have to know details about your identity and your previous involvement with the TP. I will not quote you as an “unidentified source,” a practice which I consider sloppy journalism. If you wish to get in touch with me, my email address is re@leftwing-christian.net.

    The article I wrote was not intended to discredit rank and file members of the TP. What I did attempt to do (perhaps I didn’t do it to your satisfaction) is show how Zionist manipulation is being exerted upon the movement and how members of the Congressional Tea Party Caucus are pandering to Israel. If you have information you’d like to share with me, contact me at the above email address. However, if you lapse into anger-laced profanity, as you do in your comments above, I will disregard anything you say and break off contact with you.

    • Richard,

      I think your just a political propaganda agent, trying to target veterans. And writing garbage, I have absolutely no value for your opinions at all.

      Your just another anti-American hate person, that enjoys yourself.

      I didn’t read your article, because I figured it was nothing more then garbage….

      For a little money I guess garbage is delivered. I can give you something to write about? Some facts….

      Best Regards

      • Ron Paul,

        It’s called “Fascism”, they reject individualism, to promote their ideology. Their against any parties with the exception of their own, and will demonize all to promote their movement.

        • They also stereotype all into their selected hate groups to further promote their agenda. There are many historical references to these practices.

          • If you don’t agree with what they say, then you must be “Zionist”, it’s a game of stereotyping people then pushing them into their created “Hate Group”, all by design. And further promoting their fascist ideals.

      • Edmund,

        Shall we discuss your party and all the fascist ideals their promoting, I can provide a detailed list, and it’s precisely to the point.

    • Richard, Provide me with some of your distorted views, so I can analyze and tell the truth regarding the application and or process. I am waiting….

  13. from (Zionist Occupational Government) foxz newz……………….
    strong suspicion is being directed at AmRen / American Renaissance. Suspect is possibly linked to this group. (through videos posted on his myspace and YouTube account.). The

    group’s ideology is anti government, anti immigration, anti ZOG (Zionist Occupational Government), anti Semitic.

    Nice feedback here, FOXZadl newz is directing strong suspicion to AmRen
    by “”reporting”" that strong suspicion is being directed at AmRen.
    AmRen on their own site flatly deny any connection to Jared Loughner,
    among other items AmRen denies ever being…..
    anti ZOG (Zionist Occupational Government),
    …AmRen loses 5 points for never ever being
    anti ZOG (Zionist Occupational Government),…

    Why Are The Fed Admitting Fluoride Crimes Now?

    NPR Finally Catches Up To Rense on Fluoride

    Big Govt Reversal On Fluoride Stuns Many

    Feds Say Too Much Fluoride In Drinking Water (gosh)

    Feds To Reduce Fluoride In Drinking Water

    Fluoride – ‘Forced Medication’ To Be Banned

    NY Councilman To Intro Fluoride Ban Legislation

    Chronic Toothpaste Fluoride Poisoning Mimics Lyme

    Fluoride In Water Linked To Lower Child IQ

  14. WHAT A PATHETIC JOKE THE AMERICAN POLITICAL SYSTEM HAS BECOME – JUST LOOK AT THE ‘alternative’party you have – the tea party – a party that has been subverted from the the get-go by rapid zionist shills and puppets such as that dumb bitch Palin – where are all the smart americans out there??!! – have you gone brain-dead?? – wake up to the zionist elephant in the room – better still – get an elephant gun and do what you have to do…

  15. [...] Heftige, abgestimmte Angriffe gegen Goldstone Der Film „V“ Der Holocaust Die Tea Party-Bewegung Dass Menschen in Ägypten sich selbst in Brand setzen Die Entfernung der Hamas-Seite auf [...]

  16. Wow! a seven course meal with an aperitif, wine and coffee and a doggie bag to go. Well done!!!

  17. Dave USMC 1983-87

    I knew it wouldn’t be long before the “Israeli firsters” would hijack the Tparty to keep it on their agenda of killing Israel’s enemies with American blood & treasure.
    Sarah Palin is one of the Zionist owned agents suited for the task.
    Whenever you see Sarah Palin at one of the Tparty events, just imagine a huge Israeli hand shoved up her ass making her do & say what it wishes.
    It will be interesting to see how these Israeli agents try hijacking the Oathkeepers since the Oathkeepers’ primary goal is to keep Americans armed & free from tyranny by Washington AND THAT IS UNACCEPTABLE in the eyes of most Jewish senators & Zionist bankers.
    Good luck on that one!

  18. America should apply ‘Nuremberg-type laws’
    in order to take back their country….

  19. William Chandler

    Israeli Banks Finance Newspaper calling for Genocide
    Yossi Bartal AIC, January 17 2011
    Major Israeli banks, credit institutions, and communication companies are among the advertisers in an extreme right wing weekly magazine that called for building concentration camps.
    An Israeli Jewish orthodox magazine “Ma’ayanei Hayeshua” (Fountains of Salvation) that is distributed freely in hundreds of synagogues all across the country has been the center of attention after calling in its editorial for the concentration of Arabs in extermination camps. In the article, published on 25 of December 2010, the editors attack rabbis who refused to support the call against renting apartments to Palestinians and accuse them of being too cowardly to follow the biblical commend of wiping out the people of Amalek ( who through the context of the article clearly means Palestinians). In the last segment of the editorial the editors wrote “It will be interesting to see whether they (the moderate Rabbis) leave the concentration of the Amalekites [Palestinians] in extermination camps to others, or whether they will declare that wiping out Amalek is no longer relevant”.
    This blunt call for a genocide against Palestinians is not new in publications of the Israeli extreme right, but this is the first time it appears in a “family” magazine with prominent advertisers. Among the companies advertising in the website of of Maayanei Hayeshua there are three major banks in Israel: Bank Hapo’alim, Bank Le’umi and Bank Discount, along with the Isracard Group that is working together with Visa, Europay and Mastercard. The national phone company, Bezeq, also advertises their international call service on the website. Even an academic institution, the Jerusalem College of Technology, published its advertisement inside the print version of the magazine.
    I became curious about the Jewish “right” to Palestine.
    How “convenient” that a book THEY wrote has THEIR “God” giving it to them.
    I read their claim. Their “claim” to Palestine is based entirely on War Crimes and GENOCIDE.
    It is WRONG to compare Israel to the Nazis.
    The CORRECT sequence is to compare the Nazis to the Israelis:
    You have seen the TV ads informing us that “HATE is LEARNED”
    The Nazis just copied the Jewish “HATE Manual” point by point
    KILL THE SICK and CRIPPLED
    Numbers c.5 v.2-4
    KILL HOMOSEXUALS
    Leviticus c.20 v.13 well, really the whole chapter
    KILL ALL DISSIDENTS:
    Exodus c.32 v.27
    Numbers c.11 v.1-2
    Numbers c.16 all
    Numbers c.21 v.5-6
    Numbers v.26 v.10
    KILL anyone who engages in “DIVERSITY” or “INTEGRATION”
    Numbers v25 v.4-8
    Deuteronomy c.14 v.2
    DEHUMANIZE and then EXTERMINATE ALL NON-MEMBERS:
    Numbers c.21 v.03 Canaanites
    Numbers c.21 v.24 Amorites
    Numbers c.21 v.33-35 Bashan
    Numbers c.31 all Midianites
    Numbers c.32 v. more Amorites
    Deuteronomy c.2 v.34 People of Heshbon
    Deuteronomy c.3 v.6 really the whole chapter. threescore cities
    Joshua c.12 A list of victims of Israeli GENOCIDE
    Where are THEIR “holocaust” Memorials!
    OCCUPY YOUR VICTIM’S DWELLINGS/LAND
    Numbers c.21 v.25
    Numbers c.32 v.39
    Numbers c.33 v.53
    (just to name a FEW)
    GENOCIDE CODIFIED IN THEIR RELIGION
    Numbers c.33 v.31-34
    Deuteronomy c.7 v.2
    Deuteronomy c.12 v.28-30
    Deuteronomy c.20 v.11-16
    TERRORISM CODIFIED IN THEIR RELIGION
    Deuteronomy c.2 v.2
    Deuteronomy c.7 v.1
    Jews SELF-anointed “The CHOSEN People of GOD”
    Nazis SELF-anointed “The CHOSEN People of GOD, GENETICALLY”.

  20. [...] RICHARD EDMONDSON: THE TEA PARTY’S EMERGING ZIONIST FACE : Veterans Today. January 24th, 2011 | Category: Uncategorized | Leave a comment | [...]

  21. The minute filth like Palin, Beck, the whole dirty FOX machine et al became involved you knew the Tea Party was being comandeered and steered into a ditch. Seemed to co-incide with the appearence of Jewish (i.e stolen) money.

  22. Ron Paul understands how to fight the neocons. Listen to him.
    We do NOT want to fight Russia, China, or Iran.
    We do NOT want to fight endless wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan.
    We do NOT want our military in 130 countries, spending more than the rest of the world combined.
    We do NOT want to defend Europe from a Soviet Union that no longer exists.
    We do NOT want to defend Japan or Korea; those countries can defend themselves.
    NOTE: nothing here about Israel. When the vile Ben Stein used the “anti-Semitic” canard against
    Ron Paul, Ben Stein got nothing but the worst of it. Watch that video! Watch it again! And again.
    Ron Paul has shown how to oppose the neocons and stand up to the “anti-Semitic” weapon. The anti-Semitic weapon will hurt us ONLY if we let it. LEARN FROM RON PAUL.

  23. [...] Tea Party uwaza ze ich partie przejeli syjonistci o kieruje nimi Sarah Palin… oto jeden  pierwszych artykulow na ten temat jaki wyplywa na publiczne [...]

  24. I remember the TEA party inception very well.

    Even as it started out with the right idea of the letters themselves the members then and now were overwhelmingly war mongers.

    I talked to many of them in small towns in Pa. Young and old, rich and poor.

    From what I heard and felt, they don’t really mind the war(s) and all the horror and criminal injustice they entail. They simply want war on the cheap.

  25. [...] (VeteransToday) – RICHARD EDMONDSON: THE TEA PARTY’S EMERGING ZIONIST FACE – Read More Here [...]

Comments are closed

 

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Join Our Daily Newsletter
  View Newsletter ARCHIVE

WHAT'S HOT

  1. Humor Me, Check These Out
  2. Top 10 Veterans Stories in Today’s News May 23, 2012
  3. U.S. Department of Defense Contract Awards for May 23, 2012
  4. Welcome back to the high life again! MCCAIN BEING MCCAIN FOR A CHANGE
  5. Lung Disease Following Deployment in Iraq and Afghanistan
  6. Uncle Gordy’s Mid-Week Reality Check, May 23, 2012
  7. US War Veterans Tossing Medals Back at NATO Was Heroic Act
  8. Egypt’s Presidential Elections: A Revolution at the Crossroads(Video)
  9. New VA Form Available for Ordering Veterans Grave Marker Medallion
  10. Not Every Veteran is Broken
  11. Top 10 Veterans Stories in Today’s News May 22, 2012
  12. Is Time Running Out for the VA Temporary Residence Grant?
  13. Indiana Veterans’ Home Remembers Fallen Heroes
  14. Japan’s Broke – Highest Debt Ratio of Any Industrialized Nation
  15. Duff on Press TV – Missile Shield and Nato Protests
  16. U.S. Department of Defense Contract Awards for May 21, 2012
  17. Spouses Seeing More Job Choices
  18. Is 2013 the Real 2012?
  19. Health Care Petition for Military Families Poisoned at Camp Lejeune
  20. Massive Anti-NATO Protests in Chicago
  1. taosword: It seems that one of the comments critical of throwing away ones combat medals may be coming from the...
  2. Gordon Duff: http://www.uscis.gov/portal/si te/uscis/menuitem.eb1d4c2a3e5b 9ac89243c6a7543f6d1a/?vgnex...
  3. Risodang: The top cross-block in the forefront is my 1964 Chevy Malibu, with a 58 Ford Edsel supporting it. Now the...
  4. Gordon Duff: actually, there is no definition of “natural born citizen” in the constitution were one to...
  5. christophersellars: Consider yourself humoured Tom ! lol I’m not sure where you’re going with this Tom,...


Apply for VA Home Loan Now!

Archives