JOIN TEAM VT | SIGN UP DAILY NEWSLETTER
VETERANS TODAY ON : FACEBOOK | TWITTER | VT FORUM
|

Monsanto voted Most Evil Corporation of the Year by NaturalNews readers‏

After taking nominations for the Most Evil Corporation of the Year survey from our readers, we hosted an online survey that allowed readers to vote on this question. Over 16,000 readers voted in our online survey from January 5 through 9, 2011.

Astonishingly, fifty-one percent of all votes went to Monsanto as the Most Evil Corporation of the year. This means Monsanto wins the top prize by a huge margin.

Taking second place was the Federal Reserve, with twenty percent of the votes. This is especially intriguing because it means that NaturalNews are well informed about the fact that the Federal Reserve is not a government entity but rather a corporate entity that serves the profit interests of the global banking cartel.

The other corporations included in the survey (along with their vote results) are:

British Petroleum 9%
Halliburton 5%
McDonalds 3%
Pfizer 2%
Merck 2%
Wal-Mart 2%
Nestle 1%
Other 7%

(Note: The total slightly exceeds 100% due to rounding on the part of the survey host.)
Why is Monsanto considered so evil?
The results of this survey beg the question: Why is Monsanto considered so evil, to the point where it garnered a full 51 percent of the vote?

The first and most obvious answer to that question may be that people who dislike Monsanto tend to be NaturalNews readers. There is undoubtedly a self-selection trend in this survey. But even among those readers who are into natural health, green living, organic foods and the like, why would Monsanto stand out above British Petroleum, for example, which caused enormous damage to the Gulf Coast in 2010?

The answer, I suspect, is that Monsanto behaves like an evil corporation that pretends to be angelic. The Monsanto website is an orgy of touchy-feely corporate spin that tries to position the company as the savior of life on planet Earth.

For example, the Monsanto website hosts the “Monsanto pledge” which contains the following sickening claims: (http://www.monsanto.com/whoweare/Pa…)

Integrity
Integrity is the foundation for all that we do. Integrity includes honesty, decency, consistency, and courage.

Sharing
We will share knowledge and technology to advance scientific understanding, to improve agriculture and the environment, to improve crops, and to help farmers in developing countries.
To anyone who knows anything about Monsanto, these words must strike them as particularly nauseous. For a company that thrives on GMO seeds and is an aggressive opponent of open-pollinated seeds to talk about “sharing knowledge” and “helping farmers” is enough to make you quite literally vomit. (Try to avoid splattering your keyboard.)

Monsanto’s pledge continues:

Respect
We will respect the religious, cultural, and ethical concerns of people throughout the world. The safety of our employees, the communities where we operate, our customers, consumers, and the environment will be our highest priority.

Given that Monsanto’s GMO crops are now linked to roughly 200,000 suicides of farmers and farm workers in India (http://www.naturalnews.com/030913_M…), you really have to wonder where this “respecting the cultural concerns of people” line could possibly come from.
A corporate mental patient
Touring the official Monsanto website, in fact, is a lot like walking through the mind of a madman whose self delusion has reached the point of complete psychosis. Monsanto runs around the world operating much like a mental patient, albeit a mental patient with a tremendous amount of political clout and economic power. And to oppose Monsanto is to put yourself at great risk.

Just ask all the politicians in France and across Europe who found themselves being added to a “retaliatory target list” that was assembled by the United States ambassador to France, working in conspiracy with the leaders of the GMO industry.

A lot of corporations are greedy (Goldman Sachs). Many are downright criminal (Big Pharma). But only a few corporations rise to the title of being considered truly and irreversibly evil. That’s where Monsanto apparently takes the top prize.

Oh, and by the way, this isn’t the first time Monsanto has received top honors. Forbes Magazine gave Monsanto its “Company of the Year Award” in 2009. And that tells you just about everything you need to know about the values of Forbes Magazine, too. Never let planetary health stand in the way of a quarterly profit!

I wish to thank NaturalNews readers for participating in this survey. If you’d like to read more about Monsanto and GMOs, here are some additional resources:

Natural News

Bookmark and Share

Short URL: http://www.veteranstoday.com/?p=72476

The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT or any other VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners and technicians. Legal Notice

Posted by on Jan 11 2011, With 0 Reads, Filed under Economy. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

COMMENTS

To post, we ask that you login using Facebook, Yahoo, AOL, or Hotmail in the box below.
Don't have a social network account? Register and Login direct with VT and post.
Before you post, read our Comment Policy - Feedback

Comments Closed

2 Comments for “Monsanto voted Most Evil Corporation of the Year by NaturalNews readers‏”

  1. I cast my vote on NaturalNews. I’m not a reader of it, but I had to cast this vote. I heard on public radio that Monsanto is going after France and Spain for not allowing their GM crop. I wish they’d label that crap here. If they labeled it, I don’t think Americans would buy it either. Our government is too busy trying to pull the wool over the citizens’ eyes at the same time they try to push preventive medicine. And all it’s gotten us is the most tasteless food in the world. Food that’s never ripe, or mushy cause it’s old (but it looks good on the outside) and food that’s processed to death. Yeah, I think Monsanto is the definite winner.

Comments are closed

 

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Join Our Daily Newsletter
  View Newsletter ARCHIVE

WHAT'S HOT

  1. NEO – Two Minutes Hate – Emmanuel Goldstein in Eastern Ukraine
  2. Cure for Ebola Confirmed by Sierra Leone
  3. Top Dogs Use Their Running Dogs To Whip the Other Dogs: Is It Our Fault?
  4. Syria shoots down army jets operated by ISIL
  5. VetLikeMe Weekly 10/23/2014
  6. Denuclearize or lose our species: Multigenerational effects of exposure to radiation
  7. Ottawa shooting: Yet another false flag?
  8. Idols of Perversity: Hollywood Punks, Pimps, Whores, and Your Children
  9. Police kill shooter and lose suspect in Ottawa — Canada’s 911?
  10. Saudi king’s nephew admits to Riyadh support for ISIL
  11. Israel, the U.S. Congress and Treason
  12. NEO – Oil Oligarchs continue global takedown
  13. PuppetGate, the Continuing Saga
  14. America’s Fukushima?
  15. War on ISIL exposes US disastrous leadership: Analyst
  16. Blackwater guards convicted in 2007 Baghdad shooting
  17. Veterans Stand Down gives helping hand to vets in need
  18. Sanders Reacts to Social Security Adjustment
  19. Avoidable Humanitarian Crisis at Lebanon
  20. Is It Haskalah Or Culture Of Deceit?
  1. Zaguero: This is a good article, as are most of the NEO contributions. But I would politely and respectfully question a few of the author's allegations - 1. There is no publicly available ...
  2. Preston James, Ph.D: Awesome cutting edge article that lays bare the Fukushima disaster and all others waiting to happen. How many reactors have been built on fault lines? Quite a few. Of course ...
  3. Gerry Kraut: Thank you Mr. Dean. In your second paragraph you say ...“The ISIL airforce was not a good idia for them“ I say ...oh yes, it was a good idea for “them“. 13 ...
  4. NWO going down: Uranium is not the only danger to the continuation of the Human species . What about the nanoparticle present in the Chemtrails ? Negative effects of all nanoparticle have ...
  5. Tiu: ca nada

Veterans Today Poll

For over 60 years, US Taxpayers have been funding Israel, Palestine and Middle East. Are you happy with return on investment or would you prefer those monies be invested at home instead?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Archives