JOIN TEAM VT | SIGN UP DAILY NEWSLETTER
VETERANS TODAY ON : FACEBOOK | TWITTER | VT FORUM
|

Why the Fuss? Bizarre Call to Arms Against UN Rapporteur Richard Falk for Alluding to Gaps in the 9/11 Official Story

“What seems most disturbing about the 9/11 controversy is the widespread aversion by government and media to the evidence that suggests, at the very least, the need for an independent investigation that proceeds with no holds barred,” wrote Falk.

By Elizabeth Woodworth in Foreign Policy Journal

A former Princeton international law professor has been condemned by the UN Secretary General and the U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations for alluding to “an apparent cover-up” of the events of September 11th, 2001. On January 11, 2011, UN Special Envoy to Palestine Richard Falk posted on his personal blog an article entitled “Interrogating the Arizona Killings from a Safe Distance.”[1]

Dr. Falk made a tangential point in his blog-post that governments too often abuse their authority by treating “awkward knowledge as a matter of state secrets”.

To illustrate the point, he referred to gaps and contradictions in the official account of the 9/11 attacks, which have been documented in the scholarly works of Dr. David Ray Griffin, a professor emeritus of philosophy of religion and theology.

“What seems most disturbing about the 9/11 controversy is the widespread aversion by government and media to the evidence that suggests, at the very least, the need for an independent investigation that proceeds with no holds barred,” wrote Falk.

On January 20th, executive director Hillel Neuer of UN Watch, a European NGO, called upon UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon to condemn the remarks made by Falk, and to fire him, claiming that Falk had “endorsed the conspiracy theory that the 9/11 terrorist attacks were orchestrated by the U.S. government and not Al Qaeda terrorists.” [2]

On January 24th, in a reply to Hillel Neuer, Vijay Nambiar, Ban Ki-moon’s Chief of Staff, responded that the Secretary-General “condemns these remarks. He has repeatedly stated his view that any such suggestion is preposterous — and an affront to the memory of the more than 3,000 people who died in the attack.”[3]

The US Ambassador to the UN, Susan Rice, called for Falk’s removal, stating that “Mr. Falk’s comments are despicable and deeply offensive, and I condemn them in the strongest terms.” [4]

Surely, in light of what Falk actually said, these indignant cries on behalf of the victims seem more than a little apoplectic.

If Falk’s suggestions were so “preposterous” and “offensive”, they might have been dismissed as the ravings of a madman.

So why did officials bring out their cannons to shoot at a sparrow?

Well, turning to the work of Professor Griffin we find that there were 115 omissions and distortions in the 9/11 Commission Report, though Falk did not, in his brief remarks, provide details. [5]

A search of the Internet reveals 12 professional organizations calling for a new investigation, including Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth (with over 1,400 professional members), Firefighters for 9/11 Truth, Intelligence Officers for 9/11 Truth, Lawyers for 9/11 Truth, Medical Professionals for 9/11 Truth, Pilots for 9/11 Truth, Political Leaders for 9/11 Truth, Military Officers for 9/11 Truth, and Scientists for 9/11 Truth.

In August, 2005, the New York Times printed the oral testimonies of 118 firefighters and emergency workers who reported stunning, graphic evidence of enormous explosions, including mysterious blasts in the deep sub-basements of the buildings long before the towers fell.[6]

More recently, a nine-author peer-reviewed study, which showed that the World Trade Center dust appeared to contain residue of explosive material (nanothermite), made headlines for the first week of February 2010 in major Danish newspapers. [7]

This news never reached the North American media.

Blackout in America

A December 2010 poll by the prestigious Emnid Institute showed that 89.5% of Germans doubt the US official story about the September 11th attacks.[8]

The 9/11 commissioners themselves, in a 2008 op-ed piece to the New York Times, bemoaned the withholding of witness evidence to the 9/11 Commission by the CIA:  “What we do know is that government officials decided not to inform a lawfully constituted body, created by Congress and the president, to investigate one the greatest tragedies to confront this country. We call that obstruction.” [9]

Perhaps this sparrow is worth a cannon or two.

In other words, was Falk attacked so strongly to try to make people fear suggesting in public even the possibility that the official story is problematic?

– Elizabeth Woodworth is a writer and retired medical librarian. The current focus of her writing is social justice issues, and she has extensively researched the evidence presented on both sides of the 9/11 controversy. Read more articles by Elizabeth Woodworth.

Notes

[1] Richard Falk. “Interrogating the Arizona Killings from a Safe Distance.” http://richardfalk.wordpress.com/2011/01/11/interrogating-the-arizona-killings-from-a-safe-distance/

[2] “U.N. Chief Urged to Fire Official for Promoting 9/11 Conspiracy Theory” http://www.unwatch.org/site/apps/nlnet/content2.aspx?c=bdKKISNqEmG&b=1316871&ct=9039887

[3] Letter to Mr. Neuer, January 24, 2011, http://blog.unwatch.org/index.php/2011/01/25/ngo-says-richard-falk-has-zero-credibility-urges-un-chief-to-fire-him/

[4] Rice calls for removal of U.N.’s Palestine rapporteur, JTA, January 26, 2011, http://www.jta.org/news/article/2011/01/26/2742718/rice-calls-for-removal-of-uns-palestine-rapporteur

[5] David Ray Griffin. The 9/11 Commission Report:  Omissions and Distortions, Olive Branch Press, 2004.

[6] “The September 11 Records,” New York Times, August 12, 2005, http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/html/nyregion/20050812_WTC_GRAPHIC/met_WTC_histories_full_01.html

[7] Niels H. Harrit, Jeffrey Farrer, Steven E. Jones, et al., “Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe,” Open Chemical Physics Journal, Vol. 2 (April 3, 2009): 7-31 http://www.bentham.org/open/tocpj/articles/V002/7TOCPJ.pdf.

[8] “Exklusiv-Umfrage des Wissensmagazins Welt der Wunder: Wem glauben die Deutschen noch?” December 22, 2010, http://www.bauermedia.de/weltderwunder.html?&tx_ttnews[tt_news]=750&tx_ttnews[backPid]=4&cHash=6e15318bbc#content

[9] Thomas H. Kean and Lee H. Hamilton, “Stonewalled by the C.I.A.,” New York Times, January 2, 2008, http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/02/opinion/02kean.html

Bookmark and Share

Short URL: http://www.veteranstoday.com/?p=76794

The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT or any other VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners and technicians. Legal Notice

Posted by on Jan 27 2011, With 0 Reads, Filed under Corruption, Politics. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

COMMENTS

To post, we ask that you login using Facebook, Yahoo, AOL, or Hotmail in the box below.
Don't have a social network account? Register and Login direct with VT and post.
Before you post, read our Comment Policy - Feedback

Comments Closed

3 Comments for “Why the Fuss? Bizarre Call to Arms Against UN Rapporteur Richard Falk for Alluding to Gaps in the 9/11 Official Story”

  1. There’s no mystery: The powers that be are desperate to keep ANY discussion of a new criminal investigation of 911 beyond the pale of polite society.

    Even supporters of the official conspiracy theory know that the 911 commission was a political investigation — not a criminal investigation, if you can even call it an “investigation” at all, coverup is the right word.

    Thousands of innocent people were murdered.

    And no criminal investigation with evidence presented to a grand jury?

    That’s hard to defend — so, ANY talk, that could spur talk among the general public has to be shot down.

    Anything that could force corporate media to mention a “new criminal investigation” and force corporate media to discuss the best evidence,i.e., molten pools of steel in the WTC’s footprints,…and so on, force talk radio to “discuss” best evidence of 911 inside job, even “water cooler” talk — CAN’T HAPPEN!

    Right now, there is public dissatisfaction with the “war on terror”. Americans are weary of all that has gone on in the name of 911.

    Wide-spread bullet point discussion of evidence could bring the whole ediface down.

    A spontaneous explosion of discussion — like the eruption of Egyptian protest — could break the whole thing open… pull the scab off.

    The powers that be CAN’T LET THAT HAPPEN.

    On the other hand, those of us that want the truth to come out and have a new criminal investigation of 911 have to have the courage of the Egyptian protesters and step-out into the street of public opinion and force the issue.

  2. Wasn`t the Iranian President subjected to similar vitriolic remarks??

Comments are closed

 

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Join Our Daily Newsletter
  View Newsletter ARCHIVE

WHAT'S HOT

  1. RT: Sub Off Sweden May be Dutch
  2. Russia Today on Urals “Event”
  3. NEO – Stewart, Colbert and the upcoming Nazi Terrorist conference in NY City
  4. Mishap Over Russia
  5. Finally, Some Really Good News
  6. Anti-Zionism Continues to Rise
  7. Putin: ‘US wants to subdue Russia, but no one did or ever will’
  8. Amazing Military Spouses Super Connect Helping U.S. Veterans
  9. NEO – USS Liberty Film Only a First Step
  10. More JFK mysteries solved: The second limo stop and holding back the Altgens6
  11. City to recognize ‘outstanding’ veterans
  12. Blue Gun Wednesday
  13. The “grassy knoll” rider and JFK limo back seat: Just how crowded was it?
  14. NEO – ISIL attacked Saudi Arabia
  15. VetLikeMe Weekly 10/16/2014
  16. Defeating AEGIS, the US Naval Boondoggle
  17. Veterans Of Oakley – Dedicated To Service
  18. Hamas and Fatah: Unfit to lead let alone liberate!
  19. EU mulls imposing sanctions against Israel
  20. WTC Demolition Participant Murdered?
  1. Codoh: My very first guess was that its an Israeli sub, threatening sweden for the palestinian recognition.
  2. peterof lone tree: Organic Light. http //www.bing.com/search?q=organic+light+metahistory&qs=n&form=QBRE&pq=organic+light+metahistory&sc=0-16&sp=-1&sk=&cvid=9edf41299f9d40eb9a3fdebe5d3bca17
  3. guitargirl: Well, the only thing I can say here is that 'bruinvis' means brown fish. Regina
  4. captain obvious: I'm disgusted izrahell gets annual welfare-warfare checks from a little 10 sq mile District of Criminals they control, at our expense. same for almost ALL media, and everything else too. ...
  5. DaveE: "Perhaps it is time to send them an ultimatum saying that until and unless they start allying with the truth, we will continue to make their lives miserable by proclaiming ...

Veterans Today Poll

For over 60 years, US Taxpayers have been funding Israel, Palestine and Middle East. Are you happy with return on investment or would you prefer those monies be invested at home instead?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Archives