LISTEN VT RADIO | JOIN TEAM VT | SIGN UP DAILY NEWSLETTER
VETERANS TODAY ON : FACEBOOK | TWITTER | VT FORUM
|

CONGRESSMAN RON PAUL: Classified Cable Proves US Ok’d Saddam’s Kuwait Invasion

RON PAUL

HOW THE 20-YEAR WAR STARTED

ANOTHER “WILD CONSPIRACY THEORY” PROVEN TRUE….

Editor’s note:  Though Ron Paul totally sidesteps his previous statements on 9/11 and the role of Israel and its friends in both conflicts, choosing instead to push blame on to the Republican party and a cabal of oil companies, there are telling facts to be gleaned from the Wikileak cable meant to discredit the United States.  When a reasonable and acute thinker quickly comes to the conclusion that the influence of Israel is far greater in Washington than any oil company and the rationale for targeting Iraq served only the strategic interests of Israeli expansionism and was not, in any way, related to accessing oil openly available on the world market, we can escape the artifices of Mr. Assange and his handlers along with the “soft soap” of Ron Paul and his “kow-tow” to AIPAC.”

[Congressional Record: January 26, 2011 (House)] [Page H503]

“The SPEAKER pro tempore.

Under a previous order of the House, the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Paul) is recognized for 5 minutes.

Mr. PAUL. Mr. Speaker, how did the 20-year war get started?

It had been long assumed that the United States Government, shortly before Iraq invaded Kuwait in August of 1990, gave Saddam Hussein a green light to attack. A State Department cable recently published by WikiLeaks confirmed that U.S. Ambassador April Glaspie did indeed have a conversation with Saddam Hussein one week prior to Iraq’s August 1, 1990, invasion of Kuwait.

Amazingly, the released cable was entitled,

“Saddam’s Message of Friendship to President Bush.” (published below)

In it, Ambassador Glaspie affirmed to Saddam that “the President had instructed her to broaden and deepen our relations with Iraq.” As Saddam Hussein outlined Iraq’s ongoing border dispute with Kuwait, Ambassador Glaspie was quite clear that, “we took no position on these Arab affairs.”

There would have been no reason for Saddam Hussein not to take this assurance at face value. The U.S. was quite supportive of his invasion and war of aggression against Iran in the 1980s. With this approval from the U.S. Government, it wasn’t surprising that the invasion occurred. The shock and surprise was how quickly the tables were turned and our friend, Saddam Hussein, all of a sudden became Hitler personified.

The document was classified, supposedly to protect national security, yet this information in no way jeopardized our security. Instead, it served to keep the truth from the American people about an event leading up to our initial military involvement in Iraq and the region that continues to today.

{time} 1440

The secrecy of the memo was designed to hide the truth from the American people and keep our government from being embarrassed. This was the initial event that had led to so much death and destruction–not to mention the financial costs–these past 20 years.

Our response and persistent militarism toward Iraq was directly related to 9/11, as our presence on the Arabian Peninsula–and in particular Saudi Arabia–was listed by al Qaeda as a major grievance that outraged the radicals (sic) who carried out the heinous attacks against New York and Washington on that fateful day.

Today, the conflict has spread through the Middle East and Central Asia with no end in sight.

The reason this information is so important is that if Congress and the American people had known about this green light incident 20 years ago, they would have been a lot more reluctant to give a green light to our government to pursue the current war–a war that is ongoing and expanding to this very day.

The tough question that remains is was this done deliberately to create the justification to redesign the Middle East, as many neo- conservatives desired, and to secure oil supplies for the West; or was it just a diplomatic blunder followed up by many more strategic military blunders? Regardless, we have blundered into a war that no one seems willing to end.

Julian Assange, the publisher of the WikiLeaks memo, is now considered an enemy of the state. Politicians are calling for drastic punishment and even assassination; and, sadly, the majority of the American people seem to support such moves.

But why should we so fear the truth? Why should our government’s lies and mistakes be hidden from the American people in the name of patriotism? Once it becomes acceptable to equate truth with treason, we can no longer call ourselves a free society.”

Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
90BAGHDAD4237 1990-07-25 12:12 2011-01-01 21:09 SECRET Embassy Baghdad
O 251246Z JUL 90
FM AMEMBASSY BAGHDAD
TO SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 4627
INFO AMEMBASSY ABU DHABI IMMEDIATE
AMEMBASSY CAIRO IMMEDIATE
AMEMBASSY KUWAIT IMMEDIATE
AMEMBASSY RIYADH IMMEDIATE
ARABLEAGUE COLLECTIVE
S E C R E T SECTION 01 OF 05 BAGHDAD 04237

E.O. 12356: DECL:OADR
TAGS: MOPS PREL US KU IZ
SUBJECT: SADDAM'S MESSAGE OF FRIENDSHIP TO PRESIDENT BUSH

¶1. SECRET - ENTIRE TEXT.

¶2. SUMMARY: SADDAM TOLD THE AMBASSADOR JULY 25
THAT MUBARAK HAS ARRANGED FOR KUWAITI AND IRAQI
DELEGATIONS TO MEET IN RIYADH, AND THEN ON
JULY 28, 29 OR 30, THE KUWAITI CROWN PRINCE WILL
COME TO BAGHDAD FOR SERIOUS NEGOTIATIONS. "NOTHING
WILL HAPPEN" BEFORE THEN, SADDAM HAD PROMISED
MUBARAK.

--SADDAM WISHED TO CONVEY AN IMPORTANT MESSAGE TO
PRESIDENT BUSH: IRAQ WANTS FRIENDSHIP, BUT DOES
THE USG? IRAQ SUFFERED 100,000'S OF CASUALTIES
AND IS NOW SO POOR THAT WAR ORPHAN PENSIONS WILL
SOON BE CUT; YET RICH KUWAIT WILL NOT EVEN ACCEPT
OPEC DISCIPLINE. IRAQ IS SICK OF WAR, BUT KUWAIT
HAS IGNORED DIPLOMACY. USG MANEUVERS WITH THE UAE
WILL ENCOURAGE THE UAE AND KUWAIT TO IGNORE
CONVENTIONAL DIPLOMACY. IF IRAQ IS PUBLICLY
HUMILIATED BY THE USG, IT WILL HAVE NO CHOICE
BUT TO "RESPOND," HOWEVER ILLOGICAL AND SELF
DESTRUCTIVE THAT WOULD PROVE.

--ALTHOUGH NOT QUITE EXPLICIT, SADDAM'S MESSAGE
TO US SEEMED TO BE THAT HE WILL MAKE A MAJOR PUSH
TO COOPERATE WITH MUBARAK'S DIPLOMACY, BUT WE MUST
TRY TO UNDERSTAND KUWAITI/UAE "SELFISHNESS" IS
UNBEARABLE. AMBASSADOR MADE CLEAR THAT WE CAN
NEVER EXCUSE SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTES BY OTHER THAN
PEACEFUL MEANS. END SUMMARY.

¶3. AMBASSADOR WAS SUMMONED BY PRESIDENT
SADDAM HUSAYN AT NOON JULY 25. ALSO PRESENT
WERE FONMIN AZIZ, THE PRESIDENT'S OFFICE
DIRECTOR, TWO NOTETAKERS, AND THE IRAQI
INTERPRETER.

¶4. SADDAM, WHOSE MANNER WAS CORDIAL,
REASONABLE AND EVEN WARM THROUGHOUT THE ENSUING
TWO HOURS, SAID HE WISHED THE AMBASSADOR TO
CONVEY A MESSAGE TO PRESIDENT BUSH. SADDAM
THEN RECALLED IN DETAIL THE HISTORY OF IRAQ'S
DECISION TO REESTABLISH DIPLOMATIC RELATIONS
AND ITS POSTPONING IMPLEMENTATION OF THAT
DECISION AT THE BEGINNING OF THE WAR, RATHER THAN BE
THOUGHT WEAK AND NEEDY. HE THEN SPOKE ABOUT THE
MANY "BLOWS" OUR RELATIONS HAVE BEEN SUBJECTED TO
SINCE 1984, CHIEF AMONG THEM IRANGATE. IT WAS
AFTER THE FAW VICTORY, SADDAM SAID, THAT IRAQI
MISAPPREHENSIONS ABOUT USG PURPOSES BEGAN TO
SURFACE AGAIN, I.E., SUSPICIONS THAT THE U.S. WAS
NOT HAPPY TO SEE THE WAR END.

¶5. PICKING HIS WORDS WITH CARE, SADDAM SAID
THAT THERE ARE "SOME CIRCLES" IN THE USG,
INCLUDING IN CIA AND THE STATE DEPARTMENT,
BUT EMPHATICALLY EXCLUDING THE PRESIDENT AND
SECRETARY BAKER, WHO ARE NOT FRIENDLY TOWARD
IRAQ-U.S. RELATIONS. HE THEN LISTED WHAT HE
SEEMED TO REGARD AS FACTS TO SUPPORT THIS
CONCLUSION: "SOME CIRCLES ARE GATHERING
INFORMATION ON WHO MIGHT BE SADDAM HUSAYN'S
SUCCESSOR;" THEY KEPT UP CONTACTS IN THE GULF
WARNING AGAINST IRAQ; THEY WORKED TO ENSURE
NO HELP WOULD GO TO IRAQ (READ EXIM AND CCC).

¶6. IRAQ, THE PRESIDENT STRESSED, IS IN SERIOUS
FINANCIAL DIFFICULTIES, WITH 40 BILLION USD DEBTS.
IRAQ, WHOSE VICTORY IN THE WAR AGAINST IRAN
MADE AN HISTORIC DIFFERENCE TO THE ARAB WORLD
AND THE WEST, NEEDS A MARSHALL PLAN. BUT "YOU
WANT THE OIL PRICE DOWN," SADDAM CHARGED.

¶7. RESUMING HIS LIST OF GRIEVANCES WHICH HE
BELIEVED WERE ALL INSPIRED BY
"SOME CIRCLES" IN THE USG, HE RECALLED THE
"USIA CAMPAIGN" AGAINST HIMSELF, AND THE
GENERAL MEDIA ASSAULT ON IRAQ AND ITS PRESIDENT.

¶8. DESPITE ALL THESE BLOWS, SADDAM SAID, AND
ALTHOUGH "WE WERE SOMEWHAT ANNOYED," WE STILL
HOPED THAT WE COULD DEVELOP A GOOD RELATIONSHIP.
BUT THOSE WHO FORCE OIL PRICES DOWN ARE ENGAGING
IN ECONOMIC WARFARE AND IRAQ CANNOT ACCEPT SUCH
A TRESPASS ON ITS DIGNITY AND PROSPERITY.

¶9. THE SPEARHEADS (FOR THE USG) HAVE BEEN KUWAIT
AND THE UAE, SADDAM SAID. SADDAM SAID CAREFULLY
THAT JUST AS IRAQ WILL NOT THREATEN OTHERS, IT
WILL ACCEPT NO THREAT AGAINST ITSELF. "WE HOPE
THE USG WILL NOT MISUNDERSTAND:" IRAQ ACCEPTS,
AS THE STATE DEPARTMENT SPOKESMAN SAID, THAT ANY
COUNTRY MAY CHOOSE ITS FRIENDS. BUT THE USG KNOWS
THAT IT WAS IRAQ, NOT THE USG, WHICH DECISIVELY
PROTECTED THOSE USG FRIENDS DURING THE WAR--AND THAT
IS UNDERSTANDABLE SINCE PUBLIC OPINION IN THE USG,
TO SAY NOTHING OF GEOGRAPHY, WOULD HAVE MADE IT
IMPOSSIBLE FOR THE AMERICANS TO ACCEPT 10,000 DEAD
IN A SINGLE BATTLE, AS IRAQ DID.

¶10. SADDAM ASKED WHAT DOES IT MEAN FOR THE USG
TO ANNOUNCE IT IS COMMITTED TO THE DEFENSE OF
ITS FRIENDS, INDIVIDUALLY AND COLLECTIVELY.
ANSWERING HIS OWN QUESTION, HE SAID THAT TO IRAQ
IT MEANS FLAGRANT BIAS AGAINST THE GOI.

¶11. COMING TO ONE OF HIS MAIN POINTS, SADDAM
ARGUED THAT USG MANEUVERS WITH THE UAE AND KUWAIT (SIC)
ENCOURAGED THEM IN THEIR UNGENEROUS POLICIES. THE
IRAQI RIGHTS, SADDAM EMPHASIZED, WILL BE RESTORED
ONE BY ONE, THOUGH IT MAY TAKE A MONTH OR MUCH
MORE THAN A YEAR. IRAQ HOPES THE USG WILL BE
IN HARMONY WITH ALL THE PARTIES TO THIS DISPUTE.

¶12. SADDAM SAID HE UNDERSTANDS THAT THE USG IS
DETERMINED TO KEEP THE OIL FLOWING AND TO
MAINTAIN ITS FRIENDSHIPS IN THE GULF. WHAT HE
CANNOT UNDERSTAND IS WHY WE ENCOURAGE THOSE WHO
ARE DAMAGING IRAQ, WHICH IS WHAT OUR GULF MANEUVERS
WILL DO.

¶13. SADDAM SAID HE FULLY BELIEVES THE USG WANTS
PEACE, AND THAT IS GOOD. BUT DO NOT, HE ASKED,
USE METHODS WHICH YOU SAY YOU DO NOT LIKE,
METHODS LIKE ARM-TWISTING-

¶14. AT THIS POINT SADDAM SPOKE AT LENGTH ABOUT
PRIDE OF IRAQIS, WHO BELIEVE IN "LIBERTY OR DEATH."
IRAQ WILL HAVE TO RESPOND IF THE U.S. USES THESE
METHODS. IRAQ KNOWS THE USG CAN SEND PLANES AND
ROCKETS AND HURT IRAQ DEEPLY. SADDAM ASKS THAT
THE USG NOT FORCE IRAQ TO THE POINT OF HUMILIATION
AT WHICH LOGIC MUST BE DISREGARDED. IRAQ DOES NOT
CONSIDER THE U.S. AN ENEMY AND HAS TRIED TO BE
FRIENDS.

¶15. AS FOR THE INTRA-ARAB DISPUTES, SADDAM SAID
HE IS NOT ASKING THE USG TO TAKE UP ANY PARTICULAR
ROLE SINCE THE SOLUTIONS MUST COME THROUGH ARAB
AND BILATERAL DIPLOMACY.

¶16. RETURNING TO HIS THEME THAT IRAQ WANTS
DIGNITY AND FREEDOM AS WELL AS FRIENDSHIP WITH THE
U.S., HE CHARGED THAT IN THE LAST YEAR THERE WERE
MANY OFFICIAL STATEMENTS WHICH MADE IT SEEM THAT
THE U.S. DOES NOT WANT TO RECIPROCATE. HOW, FOR
EXAMPLE, SADDAM ASKED,CAN WE INTERPRET THE
INVITATION FOR ARENS TO VISIT AT A TIME OF CRISIS
IN THE GULF? WHY DID THE U.S- DEFENSE MINISTER
MAKE "INFLAMMATORY" STATEMENTS?

¶17. SADDAM SAID THAT THE IRAQIS KNOW WHAT
WAR IS, WANT NO MORE OF IT--"DO NOT PUSH US TO IT;
DO NOT MAKE IT THE ONLY OPTION LEFT WITH WHICH WE
CAN PROTECT OUR DIGNITY."

¶18. PRESIDENT BUSH, SADDAM SAID, HAS MADE NO MISTAKE
IN HIS PRESIDENCY VIS-A-VIS THE ARABS. THE DECISION
ON THE PLO DIALOGUE WAS "MISTAKEN," BUT IT WAS
TAKEN UNDER "ZIONIST PRESSURE" AND, SADDAM SAID, IS
PERHAPS A CLEVER TACTIC TO ABSORB THAT PRESSURE.

¶19. AFTER A SHORT DIVERSION ON THE NEED FOR THE
U.S. TO CONSIDER THE HUMAN RIGHTS OF 200,000
ARABS WITH THE SAME VIGOR AND INTEREST AS THE HUMAN
RIGHTS OF THE ISRAELIS, SADDAM CONCLUDED BY
RESTATING THAT IRAQ WANTS AMERICAN FRIENDSHIP
"ALTHOUGH WE WILL NOT PANT FOR IT, WE WILL DO OUR
PART AS FRIENDS."

¶20. SADDAM THEN OFFERED AN ANECDOTE TO ILLUSTRATE
HIS POINT. HE HAD TOLD THE IRAQI KURDISH LEADER
IN 1974 THAT HE WAS PREPARED TO GIVE UP HALF OF
THE SHATT AL-ARAB TO IRAN TO OBTAIN ALL OF A
PROSPEROUS IRAQ. THE KURD HAD BET THAT SADDAM WOULD
NOT GIVE HALF THE SHATT--THE KURD WAS WRONG. EVEN
NOW, THE ONLY REAL ISSUE WITH IRAN IS THE SHATT, AND
IF GIVING AWAY HALF OF THE WATERWAY IS THE ONLY
THING STANDING BETWEEN THE CURRENT SITUATION AND
IRAQI PROSPERITY, SADDAM SAID HE WOULD BE GUIDED
BY WHAT HE DID IN 1974.

¶21. THE AMBASSADOR THANKED SADDAM FOR THE
OPPORTUNITY TO DISCUSS DIRECTLY WITH HIM SOME OF
HIS AND OUR CONCERNS. PRESIDENT BUSH, TOO, WANTS
FRIENDSHIP, AS HE HAD WRITTEN AT THE 'ID AND ON
THE OCCASION OF IRAQ'S NATIONAL DAY. SADDAM
INTERRUPTED TO SAY HE HAD BEEN TOUCHED BY THOSE

¶22. AMBASSADOR RESUMED HER THEME, RECALLING THAT
THE PRESIDENT HAD INSTRUCTED HER TO BROADEN AND
DEEPEN OUR RELATIONS WITH IRAQ. SADDAM HAD REFERRED
TO "SOME CIRCLES" ANTIPATHETIC TO THAT AIM. SUCH
CIRCLES CERTAINLY EXISTED, BUT THE U.S. ADMINISTRATION
IS INSTRUCTED BY THE PRESIDENT. ON THE OTHER HAND,
THE PRESIDENT DOES NOT CONTROL THE AMERICAN PRESS;
IF HE DID, CRITICISM OF THE ADMINISTRATION WOULD NOT
EXIST. SADDAM AGAIN INTERRUPTED TO SAY HE UNDERSTOOD
THAT. THE AMBASSADOR SAID SHE HAD SEEN THE DIANE
SAWYER SHOW AND THOUGHT THAT IT WAS CHEP AND UNFAIR.
BUT THE AMERICAN PRESS TREATS ALL POLITICIANS
WITHOUT KID GLOVES--THAT IS OUR WAY.

¶23. WHAT IS IMPORTANT IS THAT THE PRESIDENT HAS
VERY RECENTLY REAFFIRMED HIS DESIRE FOR A BETTER
RELATIONSHIP AND HAS PROVEN THAT BY, FOR EXAMPLE,
OPPOSING SANCTIONS BILLS. HERE SADDAM INTERRUPTED
AGAIN. LAUGHING, HE SAID THERE IS NOTHING LEFT
FOR IRAQ TO BUY IN THE U.S. EVERYTHING IS
PROHIBITED EXCEPT FOR WHEAT, AND NO DOUBT THAT WILL
SOON BE DECLARED A DUAL-USE ITEM- SADDAM SAID, HOWEVER,
HE HAD DECIDED NOT TO RAISE THIS ISSUE, BUT RATHER
CONCENTRATE ON THE FAR MORE IMPORTANT ISSUES AT HAND.

¶24. AMBASSADOR SAID THERE WERE MANY ISSUES HE
HAD RAISED SHE WOULD LIKE TO COMMENT ON, BUT
SHE WISHED TO USE HER LIMITED TIME WITH THE
PRESIDENT TO STRESS FIRST PRESIDENT BUSH'S DESIRE
FOR FRIENDSHIP AND, SECOND, HIS STRONG DESIRE, SHARED
WE ASSUME BY IRAQ, FOR PEACE AND STABILITY IN THE MID
EAST. IS IT NOT REASONABLE FOR US TO BE CONCERNED
WHEN THE PRESIDENT AND THE FOREIGN MINISTER BOTH
SAY PUBLICLY THAT KUWAITI ACTIONS ARE THE
EQUIVALENT OF MILITARY AGGRESSION, AND THEN WE
LEARN THAT MANY UNITS OF THE REPUBLICAN GUARD
HAVE BEEN SENT TO THE BORDER? IS IT NOT REASONABLE
FOR US TO ASK, IN THE SPIRIT OF FRIENDSHIP, NOT
CONFRONTATION, THE SIMPLE QUESTION: WHAT ARE YOUR
INTENTIONS?

¶25. SADDAM SAID THAT WAS INDEED A REASONABLE
QUESTION. HE ACKNOWLEDGED THAT WE SHOULD BE
CONCERNED FOR REGIONAL PEACE, IN FACT IT IS OUR
DUTY AS A SUPERPOWER. "BUT HOW CAN WE MAKE THEM
(KUWAIT AND UAE) UNDERSTAND HOW DEEPLY WE ARE
SUFFERING." THE FINANCIAL SITUATION IS SUCH THAT
THE PENSIONS FOR WIDOWS AND ORPHANS WILL HAVE
TO BE CUT. AT THIS POINT, THE INTERPRETER AND
ONE OF THE NOTETAKERS BROKE DOWN AND WEPT.

¶26. AFTER A PAUSE FOR RECUPERATION, SADDAM SAID,
IN EFFECT, BELIEVE ME I HAVE TRIED EVERYTHING: WE
SENT ENVOYS, WROTE MESSAGES, ASKED FAHD TO
ARRANGE QUADRAPARTITE SUMMIT (IRAQ, SAG, UE,
KUWAIT). FAHD SUGGESTFD OIL MINISTERS INSTEAD AND
WE AGREED TO THE JEDDAH AGREEMENT ALTHOUGH IT WAS
WELL BELOW OUR HOPES. THEN, SADDAM CONTINUED,
TWO DAYS LATER THE KUWAITI OIL MINISTER ANNOUNCED
HE WOULD WANT TO ANNUL THAT AGREEMENT WITHIN TWO
MONTHS. AS FOR THE UAE, SADDAM SAID, I BEGGED
SHAYKH ZAYID TO UNDERSTAND OUR PROBLEMS (WHEN
SADDAM ENTERTAINED HIM IN MOSUL AFTER THE BAGHDAD
SUMMIT), AND ZAYID SAID JUST WAIT UNTIL I GET
BACK TO ABU DHABI. BUT THEN HIS MINISTER OF OIL
MADE "BAD STATEMENTS."

¶27. AT THIS POINT, SADDAM LEFT THE ROOM TO TAKE
AN URGENT CALL FROM MUBARAK. AFTER HIS RETURN,
THE AMBASSADOR ASKED IF HE COULD TELL HER IF
THERE HAS ANY PROGRESS IN FINDING A PEACEFUL WAY
TO DEFUSE THE DISPUTE. THIS WAS SOMETHING PRESIDENT
BUSH WOULD BE KEENLY INTERESTED TO KNOW. SADDAM
SAID THAT HE HAD JUST LEARNED FROM MUBARAK THE
KUWAITIS HAVE AGREED TO NEGOTIATE. THE KUWAITI
CROWN PRINCE/PRIME MINISTER WOULD MEET IN RIYADH
WITH SADDAM'S NUMBER TWO, IZZAT IBRAHIM, AND THEN
THE KUWAITI WOULD COME TO BAGHDAD ON SATURDAY,
SUNDAY OR, AT THE LATEST, MONDAY, JULY 30.

¶28. "I TOLD MUBARAK," SADDAM SAID, THAT "NOTHING
WILL HAPPEN UNTIL THE MEETING," AND NOTHING WILL
HAPPEN DURING OR AFTER THE MEETING IF THE KUWAITIS
WILL AT LAST "GIVE US SOME HOPE."

¶29. THE AMBASSADOR SAID SHE WAS DELIGHTED TO HEAR
THIS GOOD NEWS. SADDAM THEN ASKED HER TO CONVEY
HIS WARM GREETINGS TO PRESIDENT BUSH AND TO
CONVEY HIS MESSAGE TO HIM.

¶30. NOTE: ON THE BORDER QUESTION, SADDAM REFERRED
TO THE 1961 AGREEMENT AND A "LINE OF PATROL" IT
HAD ESTABLISHED. THE KUWAITIS, HE SAID, HAD TOLD
MUBARAK IRAQ WAS 20 KILOMETERS "IN FRONT" OF THIS
LINE. THE AMBASSADOR SAID THAT SHE HAD SERVED IN
KUWAIT 20 YEARS BEFORE; THEN, AS NOW, WE TOOK NO
POSITION ON THESE ARAB AFFAIRS.

¶31. COMMENT: IN THE MEMORY QF THE CURRENT
DIPLOMATIC CORPS, SADDAM HAS NEVER SUMMONED AN
AMBASSADOR. HE IS WORRIED.

ACCORDING TO HIS OWN POLITICAL THEORIZING
(U.S. THE SOLE MAJOR POWER IN THE MIDDLE EAST),
HE NEEDS AT A MINIMUM A CORRECT RELATIONSHIP
WITH US FOR OBVIOUS GEOPOLITICAL REASONS,
ESPECIALLY AS LONG AS HE PERCEIVES MORTAL
THREATS FROM ISRAEL AND IRAN. AMBASSADOR
BELIEVES SADDAM SUSPECTS OUR DECISION SUDDENLY
TO UNDERTAKE MANEUVERS WITH ABU DHABI IS A
HARBINGER OF A USG DECISION TO TAKE SIDES.
FURTHER, SADDAM, HIMSELF BEGINNING TO HAVE AN
INKLING OF HOW MUCH HE DOES NOT UNDERSTAND ABOUT
THE U.S., IS APPREHENSIVE THAT WE DO NOT
UNDERSTAND CERTAIN POLITICAL FACTORS WHICH
INHIBIT HIM, SUCH AS:

--HE CANNOT ALLOW HIMSELF TO BE PERCEIVED AS
CAVING IN TO SUPERPOWER BULLYING (AS U/S HAMDUN
FRANKLY WARNED US IN LATE 1988);

--IRAQ, WHICH LOST 100,000'S OF CASUALTIES, IS
SUFFERING AND KUWAIT IS "MISERLY" AND "SELFISH."

¶32. IT WAS PROGRESS TO HAVE SADDAM ADMIT
THAT THE USG HAS A "RESPONSIBILITY" IN THE
REGION, AND HAS EVERY RIGHT TO EXPECT AN
ANSWER WHEN WE ASK IRAQ'S INTENTIONS. HIS
RESPONSE IN EFFECT THAT HE TRIED VARIOUS
DIPLOMATIC/CHANNELS BEFORE RESORTING TO
UNADULTERATED INTIMIDATION HAS AT LEAST THE
VIRTUE OF FRANKNESS. HIS EMPHASIS THAT HE
WANTS PEACEFUL SETTLEMENT IS SURELY SINCERE
(IRAQIS ARE SICK OF WAR), BUT THE TERMS SOUND
DIFFICULT TO ACHIEVE. SADDAM SEEMS TO WANT
PLEDGES NOW ON OIL PRICES AND PRODUCTION TO
COVER THE NEXT SEVERAL MONTHS.

GLASPIE
Bookmark and Share

Related Posts:

Short URL: http://www.veteranstoday.com/?p=77870

The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT or any other VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors or partners. Legal Notice

Posted by on Jan 31 2011, With 0 Reads, Filed under WarZone. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
Get Your Loan Now
Apply for VA Loan Now
Education
Get Your Loan Now
Get Your Loan Now
Get Your Loan Now
Apply for your VA Home Loan Now
Apply for your VA Home Loan Now
Apply for your VA Home Loan Now
Apply for Jobs on HireVeterans.com Now
Apply for Jobs on HireVeterans.com Now
Apply for Jobs on HireVeterans.com Now

COMMENTS

To post, we ask that you login using Facebook, Yahoo, AOL, or Hotmail in the box below.
Don't have a social network account? Register and Login direct with VT and post.
Before you post, read our Comment Policy - Feedback


Comments Closed

75 Comments for “CONGRESSMAN RON PAUL: Classified Cable Proves US Ok’d Saddam’s Kuwait Invasion”

  1. Please feel free to pass the NWO certificate around as it spells out what the Kuwait deception was all about.

  2. When Saddam had his Body Double #12 finally caught for the cameras from the foxhole, he sent a long thankyou note to the CIA for letting him have a few months grace to transfer all the wired cash accounts and stolen loot to the Canary islands accounts.

    See the Short but amazing flash animation:
    http://southeastasianews.org/images/thanks_saddam.swf

    After all… the CIA + Daddy Bush had all along been instrumental in raising and maintaining Saddam in power, and of course supplying him with all the lethal powder needed for junior to invade some ten years later.

    All that remains as with all illegal conflicts (WW1, WW2, Vietnam) is for the people eventually to learn we were sold that conflict on a complete and outright lie, and for that truth to become evident.

    At least with this revelation it can be placed in the records of Congress and show the world the lies of the BUSH crime family.

    SEE: The New World Order certificate issued to all Serving members of Conflict Desert Storm to celebrate Daddy Bushs’ push for a global New World Order:

    http://southeastasianews.org/images/NewWorldOrder_certificate.jpg
    This certificate was issued to all serving members in the Kuwait/Iraq conflict.
    Bizarre but True.

  3. This is great news that it was voiced on the floor of the US congress, and that is not old news.

    Israel is our enemy and the problem.

  4. I knew about this several years ago. Too bad so many Americans will not go anywhere near this fact. Most Americans loath and despise the truth. Instead they want to believe in some holy/disney version of America that does not exist at all.
    Another more poignant story was the Kuwaiti ambassador’s daughter who tearfully described how the evil Iraqi soldiers tipped over incubators in the hospital. This was proven to be an absolute lie. She had been coached to say this in order to convince the gullible congresscritters as well as the American public.
    Obviously bush and the rest of the neocons back then knew what they were doing. Setting Saddam up for a fall and they did it very well. Also please note that soon after that little war, the price of oil dropped to the point where oil wells in Texas and elsewhere were no longer able to continue pumping as it was too costly. Then came the S&L crash as a result of diving oil prices (among other things).
    Also note Kuwait was originally part of Iraq before Britain decided to divvy up part of the country and use as a reward for one their toadies in Iraq. So they gave him part of Iraq and set him up as prince, or king or whatever. It proves you can take a horse’s ass and make something out of it but it usually smell’s just as bad as if it were still that part of the horse.

  5. Gordon;
    Maybe we need a little history lesson. Please correct me if I get any of this wrong. A little more than 100 years ago, the British navy essentially ruled the world. The German Navy began using oil from what’s now Iraq and BP’s predecessor “the Anglo-Persian Oil Co.” began in what’s now Iran to supply oil to the British Navy, which had to chage from coal to keep technologically even. Rothchild wanted Palestine, not because he actually cared about zionism, he wanted to control the oil to the Medeteranian Sea and sell it to the British Navy. He used zionism as political cover to try to control the Suez Canal, build pipelines around it, and build pipelines from Iran and Iraq overland to israel. Brizenski said in “the Grand Chessboard” that control over mid-east oil is essential for America’s millitary to remain “primary”. Isn’t control over israel and control over oil the exact same thing?

    • Tim
      this is “ron paul” and not me
      yes…i am familiar with the pipeline that was closed in 1948, kirkuk to haifa
      g

      • Gordon;
        That’s why I asked you. What am I not understanding?

        • Tim, Read Evan Black’s book; “Banking on Baghdad”.
          Nothing has changed, except the Indian troops have been replaced by the sacrifice of our ‘western’ boys for the oil corporates.
          Note the report by the Governor of ‘Bombay’ (later in Baghdad): to the effect; ‘The Arabs are all fighting and we have the oil’. A real hoot!!!!!

  6. I applaud Rand Paul for wanting to end aid to Israel and thank our beloved Congressman Ron Paul for everything he has done–aimed at ending the Fed. The radical senator from VT let him down the last moment. How can you ever trust a radical?

    Michael J Volz, I agree with everything you said about the Jew issue.

  7. So what is new. Many other’s already knew.
    They need to be put on trial for all the vet’s that died for nothing except to make somebody else rich

    • Good point Peter. That’s the bottom line as far as I’m concerned. These criminal creeps always need someone else to die for them in their criminal schemes.

      Mike

  8. Sorry situation since the end of WW2 with the EU, US and Mossad meddling in the leadership of Middle Eastern nations like Iran, Iraq, Saudi, Egypt & Lebanon.

  9. Have you called Rand Paul’s office to express support for his stand on stopping aid to Isreal?

  10. saddam h. had a video of glaspie giving the green go ahead.

  11. Reza Pahlavi, Sheikh Usama Bin Ladin, Saddam Hussain and Hosni Mubarak are/were all CIA assets and stooges.

    Muslims did not murder Anouar Al Sadat to see a dictator put in his place for 30 years ; THE CIA DID!

    Just like the CIA put Saddam into power in Iraq and used him to wage war on Iran!

    Does it really matter if the US agreed or not to the invasion of Kuwait?

    Is it not funny that the Israelis said the same thing happened regarding their cowardly attacks on the Arabs in June 1967. They said they understood the US (McNamara) even gave them the “green light” to attack!

    When the Shah disagreed with the US about oil prices, he was replaced!

    When Saddam dumped the dollar, his country and people were destroyed. Saddam was even ‘hung’ for doing CIA work, and his country divided and given to the Jews of the Apartheid entity!

    When the Afghan government disagreed with the US about the oil pipelines and the opium crops, the country was invaded, destroyed and occupied permanently. Sheikh Usama Bin Ladin was bombed in December 2001 and killed by his US friends.

    Now, it is the turn of Hosni Mubarak and of their Saudi Allies! There is nothing new under GOD’s sky.

    B.A.Frémaux-Soormally

    • Nice summary by BA F-S. There truly is nothing new under the sun. The Americans double crossed several Indian tribes which helped the Americans during the Revolution. When it was over, they failed to protect the Indians as promised.

      Similar things happened with the Japanese, America’s WW1 ally. There were frantic Japanese diplomatic efforts to make a deal with the U.S. in and effort to avoid WW2, but they were ignored and insulted. Our prior ally was marked for destruction and we all know the rest of the story.

      Regarding April Glaspies “Green Light” assurance to Saddam,That was well and widely known to the”antiwar” community of the time. It’s not an obscure fact at all, but it is good to revisit it as Mr Duff has done. This is a fine article even if it does take Ron Paul to task, but in Paul’s defense, he can only cover so much in a 5 minute speech.

      • “Nothing new here.”

        Depends. For the informed, there’s nothing new. For the uninformed, much is new. Most are uninformed.

        Furthermore it doesn’t have to be new to warrant repeated exposure.

        Good job, to both Mr Duff and Ron Paul.

    • BA, your narrative fits in nicely with mine above.

      Mike

      • What really bends my mind on all this is that somehow the USA is operating in the best interests of the American People which is obviously not the case! If not in the best interests of the People of the USA, then in whose best interests?????

        PERHAPS THE GNOMES OF ZURICH???? Carroll Quigley in his book “Tragedy and Hope” sneaked in mainstream confirmation that the Gnomes are a reality, not a CONSPIRACY THEORY! Seems the GNOMES, even though most of them are “jewish”, according to Quigley, don’t look after the best interests of the Jewish people either.

        So why do “progressive” and “liberal” American Jews support the criminal schemes of their TRIBAL leaders? Is it just to boost their egos, given they are part of a “smart” (criminal?) TRIBE?

        Israel Shamir said in the “Pardes”, being a jew is a choice one makes (to be complicit in criminal activities in the name of “the jews”. Jews have the same dilemma Americans have, as illegal wars are fought in their name.

        Mike

        • >>> So why do “progressive” and “liberal” American Jews support the criminal schemes of their TRIBAL leaders? Is it just to boost their egos, given they are part of a “smart” (criminal?) TRIBE?

          Everyone’s being played.

          • And, “Israel Shamir said in the “Pardes”, being a jew is a choice one makes (to be complicit in criminal activities in the name of “the jews”. Jews have the same dilemma Americans have, as illegal wars are fought in their name.” The American jews can shut down AIPAC and the DEFAMATION LEAGUE tomorrow morning IF THEY wanted but rather they prefer basking in the glory of JEWISH SUPREMACISM as opposed to fighting their amoral tribal leaders.

            The Irish, Ethiopian people, much less the gentile American people do not control AIPAC or the DEFAMATION LEAGUE.

            MIKE

  12. Fun to take a cheap shot at Ron Paul.
    A guy who has single handedly fought the Federal Reserve for the last 20 YEARS.

    Lets see all the patriotic democrats come forward…

    Oh right there is NONE.
    NADA.
    Crickets…

    Funny how when a real hero puts himself in the public eye he gets criticized.

    Too bad the democrats are such a bunch of gutless cowards nobody talks about them.

    Hmmmm….

    • Ron Paul has done well talking about the federal reserve for sometime. I give him credit for that but it doesn’t give him license to obscure other areas. This liberal vs conservative debate is also something for children. Both sides are run by a mafia.

      The liberal vs conservative dichotomy is something for children. Many of us are bored with it.

      In modern American parlance they are basically the same in that they represent one faction of a political system consisting of one party. That party being the banker party.

      The liberal vs conservative fest is fueled by a desire to keep the sheep from realizing the significance of the 1913 coup which replaced their constitution and placed the printing of money in the non federal federal reserve.

      It is all about the money it always was and the bread and circus of the MSM allows each of the two groups to rest secure believing they have found the answer and the true path to national salvation.

      They are basically unaware of the Hegelian didactics used to keep them in line. The entire exchange in many instances seems to have digressed to the point where conservatives feel that anyone who disagrees with them is somehow a liberal and vice versa.

      It seems to be somewhat of an intellectual crutch for both type combatants when they feel intellectually challenged or someone disagrees with them.

      At times it is like watching hamsters on a treadmill. A major clue that it seems nobody notices is the fact that politicians randomly switch parties and policies quite frequently. Keep your eye on the man behind the curtain.

      At times I am referred to as a liberal and other times a conservative. I suppose it is a good sign. Hopefully it represents a balanced approach which attempts to decide issues based on merit according to my personal philosophy and world view.

      • @Dub Did it ever occur to you that the reason Dr. Ron Paul keeps digging at the Fed Res. is because to audit and end the fed would probably cure 90% of the worlds problems. Who do you think causes so much of the worlds problems. The IMF? Where do they get their money? Audit the Fed. The world will benefit not to mention the American people.

  13. THIS IS PRIME EVIDENCE THAT U.S. leaders are responsible for Middle East wars of the last two decades– that they are the murderers of all our youth killed in the military, as well as the many more civilians of the Middle East who have died. War is rotten. So are our leaders. – G. Beres

    • Throw in Britain and call it a century. Remember the betrayal thst caused Maj. T. E. Lawrence to refuse King George’s medal. Remember Mossadegh, BP and the Dulles boys. Remember Ronald Storrs’ “loyal Jewish Ulster in a sea of hostile Arabism”. Anthony Eden and Suez.

      But there seems to be something new afoot now that may turn a new page in that old dusty book. May it be so!

  14. If the democratic party had 10 people like Ron Paul there would be a revolution in the morning. Unfortunately they are gutless cowards. Don’t argue with me it’s true.
    Nancy Pelosi became speaker of the house under the pretense that she would impeach Bush. She lied.

    The democrats controlled both houses and the Presidency. What did we get? NOTHING BUT MORE CORPORATISM.

    I hate Neocons, but you know what at least they have balls…

  15. @G:

    Actually, if you read between the lines Ron Paul makes his position on 911 fairly obvious. He has basically stated that he can’t fight every force at once so he picked his battles (i.e. the FED). He let it slip once, sorry I can’t seem to find it.

    There are only so many groups you can fight against and keep getting re-elected.

    “Ron Paul Exposes Neo Conservatives A.K.A. NEOCONS”

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G0N0iqUiaTs

    • Yeah -and ron paul has been on alex Jones show at least a hundred times. That in itself tells you how he feels about 911

    • It seems to me the following statement:

      “The tough question that remains is was this done deliberately to create the justification to redesign the Middle East, as many neo-conservatives desired…”

      indicates Cong. Paul’s correct understanding of the Israeli connection. Who does not equate Neocons and Israel?

      His mild couching of the terms can be interpreted as wishing to stay within a narrow working range. Sure, he could set the cat among the pigeons, even call Israel the source of all the world’s troubles. I doubt that such venting would accomplish much good for us all.

      His statement as it stands accomplishes quite a bit, IMO.

    • WeAreChangeLA questions Ron Paul about the IMF as well as 9-11 Truth

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=88x6JdfjwCY

      She sure caught Ron off guard here. I’ve only seen him respond this way twice in my life. I believe that he knows something is drastically wrong with the governments position on the attack but has bigger fish to fry like the entity that if in fact were audited (The Fed)would put and to the meddling that we do around the world. When the Fed was created there was and is to this day a clause in the The Federal Reserve Act to buy them out for a specified amount.
      It’s time to do just that.

  16. Glaspie’s green light is old news Gordon. This was raised by those of us who condemned the US invasion from the outset back in 2003.

    • It has also been successfully denied for 20 years.
      g

      • Ambassador April Glaspie said to Saddam Hussein, when he informed her of his intention to take back Kuwait, that: “The US will not interfere in any dispute between two brother countries”. I think she was sincere and that it was the official impression the US Govt wanted her to have.

        When she came back home, she was practically ‘incomunicada’ and an effective gag order was placed on her: “No talk to the Media”…

        The Zion Talmudic Mafia had set up Saddam Hussein and the US Govt, in a gangster like manner, made the Saudis, the Kuwaitis and even the Japanese pay-share the cost of Operation Desert Storm… A racket, it was planned and executed by deceit and lying all along to the American People.

        Only fools will trust any US official, as long as the Federal Reserve is in Private Jewish hands and not PROPERTY of the American People.

        • Then, after the war, Iraqi oil was cut off for ten years by the USA government! Saddam’s greatest fault was selling oil too cheap (like Henry Ford, he was leaving too much money on the table for his main customer, the American People)!

          At the time of the USA attack on Iraq oil was at $9.00 a barrel and falling. Saddam didn’t care, he kept pumping it and selling it at whatever the market would bring. Oil has never been that low since!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

          That was the wish of the European, Wall St. and jew controlled Western oil industry. They always like making more money by doing less work. That is why the jews are considered so “smart”. They make more money by doing less for the customer.

          As Yoav Shamir’s Israeli grandmother said in his movie DEFAMATION: THE JEWS IN AMERICA HAVE MONEY WITHOUT DOING ANY WORK———THEY KNOW THE MONKEY BUSINESS!!!!! (A NICE LITTLE JEWISH GRANDMOTHER SAID THAT, NOT MV, THE ANTISEMANTIC! SHE REMINDS ME OF MY GRANDMOTHER WHO’S GRANDMOTHER WAS JEWISH. SHE SAID THE DAMNEDEST THINGS AT CERTAIN TIMES—–SHE COULDN’T RESIST SPEAKING THE TRUTH).

          So much for the USA government protecting the best interests of the citizens
          of the USA!!!!!!!!!!

          Now “liberal” and “progressive” jews in America promote the idea that USA armies are stealing oil for the USA!!!!! What a joke!!!!!!!!!!!!! Saddam was GIVING the oil to the USA at prices the Government (controlled by jews) thought was TOO CHEAP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

          Jonathan Kwitney in his suppressed book “Endless Enemies” made it clear that CIA was controlled by the (International) oil companies. CIA is a mossad subsidiary today, not that it did not have influence over the CIA in the first place. Joe Vialls made curious people aware of the fact that Israel got unlimited free oil from Iran for thirty years after the CIA installed the Shah of Iran. Who is really stealing Middle East oil? It has never been the American Government for the American People.

          Mike

          • Correction: I said above: “They always like making more money by doing less work.” I should have said: “They always like making more money by doing less work or no work at all”.

            Sorry, Mike

          • Mike, I admire your honesty and calling a spade a spade without resorting to euphemism when pointing the finger at who are responsible for bankrupting the USA-playing games with EU and impoverishing the American People.

            We can’t resolve a real EXISTENTIAL CONFLICT we have with the Zion Talmudic Mafia that hijacked the US Govt without identifying in plain English that the Outfit is run by mostly (98%) JEWS and controlled from the Rogue State of Israel.

            Now, actually the Jewish owned-controlled FEDERAL RESERVE prints “legal Tender” notes out of THIN AIR and the Jewish Banksters use FRACTIONAL BANKING and concede LOANS to the Goyim (us & US Govt)against collateral-guaranties in tangible assets, BUT THEY DO NOT PHYSICALLY POSSESS THE REAL MONEY, WHICH MEANS THAT THE WHOLE BUSINESS IS A MONSTROUS FRAUD. A HUGE SCAM, that’s what it is, MADE even more easy now with electronic money transfer.

            When the same BANKSTERS foreclose, they take away HOUSES-CARS-VALUABLES that exist for REAL, you can see them and you can touch them…

            That’s why I consider that the FED RESERVE is the REAL ENEMY of USA and the American People and so are its associated banks.

            Take away from the Zion Talmudic Mafia the ILLEGAL PATENT it has to print money and all the Zionist Ponzi Scheme will crumble.

      • Agreed, but the info was available and in circulation nonetheless. Denials from exposed liars carries no weight with anyone who bothers to turn off the TV and truly inform themselves.

      • I don’t know why this is new news, I heard of this from Arab college students back in 1993. So apparently it was well known all over the Arab world that Poppy Bush lied to Saddam, just like his dipshit son did to the world in 2003.

        Listen to a show by Kevin Barrett interviewing Susan Lindauer one of many US Citizen’s (CIA Asset to Iraq) being detained for more than a year under the Patriot Act/ Habeas Corpus for bringing up to many “high level US Officials” that Saddam did not want war with the US and that he would do ANYTHING to avoid it (inspections, etc…) all the Bush Administration had to do is say what they wanted, but no-one would listen to her. The Bush Administration had orders or had already planned on going to war regardless.

        http://noliesradio.org/archives/27509

        She also reveals a high level CIA agent (her handler) had pre-knowledge of 911.

    • What, are you all hard of reading? The cable says:

      “AMBASSADOR MADE CLEAR THAT WE CAN NEVER EXCUSE SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTES BY OTHER THAN PEACEFUL MEANS. END SUMMARY”

      Which part of this gives a so-called “green light” for the invasion of Kuwait? Are we reading the same cable? Are we on the same planet???

      The “green light” comments comes up in the limited context of Iraq crossing the “line of patrol” established in the 1961 agreement (when Kuwait established independence from Great Britain). In no way can I read these comments to say Iraq can invade all of Kuwait!

  17. True, but now it is in the congressional records, that’s the point.

Comments are closed

 

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Join Our Daily Newsletter
  View Newsletter ARCHIVE

WHAT'S HOT

  1. President Barack Obama, America’s Pol Pot
  2. Duplicitous Human Rights Misinformation on Ukraine
  3. Sen. Feinstein Rewards Rich Cronies at The Expense of Homeless Veterans
  4. Now is the Time to Enact the Wanta National Recovery Plan for Our Great Nation America
  5. US sanctions against Crimean officials are ‘silly, embarrassing’
  6. Independent 2013 Survey Shows Veterans Highly Satisfied with VA Care
  7. ‘MH370 call exposing 9/11 cover-up?’
  8. NEO – Putin puts Ukraine gas payments on Europe’s back
  9. Challenging the “Holocaust Uniqueness” Doctrine (Part V)
  10. The Kosher Trinity and Jewish Quantum Mechanics
  11. Iran to Hold First International Shakespeare Conference
  12. VA Researchers Receive Nation’s Top Award for Early Career Scientists
  13. Sandy Hook Elementary School: closed in 2008, a stage in 2012
  14. VetLikeMe Weekly 4/11/14
  15. Speculators, Cartels & Myths of Scarcity
  16. Lavrov – Kiev’s Illegal Use of Force Damages Talks
  17. Syria False Flags Exposed – War is Over
  18. Jonathan Pollard still Serving Israeli Espionage
  19. Top 10 Veterans Stories in Today’s News – April 14, 2014
  20. All veterans eligible for VA dental coverage
  1. Bartered: "To discuss any kind of association between a Fiat Monetary System based on Babylonian Money-Magick and its onerous usury is a complete contradiction in terms." Trying to correct the usury within ...
  2. Preston James, Ph.D: Share information about Lee Wanta's story and his awesome plan to build a high speed Maglev Railroad which would create 2 million new good paying job opportunities.
  3. Preston James, Ph.D: His vast earnings from related investments was secondary or incidental to the main object which was to negotiate and end to the Cold War and in doing so take down ...
  4. LC: Barbara Olson was one of the hijackers - & remarried Teddy after he bought her a new face- 9/11 Ted & Barbara Olson / Fake Victim Mysteries *******www.youtube.com/watch?v=YarIJ_xfkts
  5. patriotone: I have to say, I'm anything but satisfied with the VA. I have been in a protracted fight to get the needed care for my service connection. I have been ...

Veterans Today Poll

When will the New World Order One World Government officially be announced?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Archives