JB Campbell was born in Chicago in 1946, grew up in Oakbrook, Illinois, then the polo capital of the world. Graduated from Carmel HS in California. Raced cars in Australia and England for two years. Three years of college, mostly at the University of Nevada, Reno.

Operated the School of Slide Control to train racing drivers and others the technique of slide control.

Commercial (oilfield) diver in Texas and Louisiana for two years.

Campbell was in the British South Africa Police in Rhodesia in the early '70s and was a Section Officer in Support Unit, the anti-terrorist group. He was the first American in the BSAP since 1923.

Campbell started the modern militia movement in 1989 with his book, The New American Man - A Call to Arms. The militia movement lasted until '95 with the state-sponsored destruction of the OKC federal building. The State Department considers him a "mercenary." The FBI considers him a problem. The Secret Service considers him a terrorist. Campbell couldn't care less.

Campbell makes his living as a drilling supervisor, mainly in southern California.


View Latest Posts >>>

Dimitri Khalezov on 9-11

Veterans Today Staff Writer Dimitri Khalezov Talks on 9/11 and the Mysterious Death of Nick Rowe

By J B Campbell STAFF WRITER

You may not remember Nick Rowe. His 1971 book, Five Years to Freedom, told the story of his being captured by Viet Cong after a hellacious gunfight in October, 1963 and his five years as a POW, followed by his escape just before being executed. The Vietnamese Communists had just learned that he had deceived them for five years and kept from them the fact that he was in Special Forces, rather than in the engineers.


YouTube - Veterans Today -

American students had passed on to the Viet Cong Central Committee their research on Nick. Hiding his true identity and the loss of face to the Reds resulted in a death sentence. He was being marched to the place of execution when a B-52 air raid scattered the firing squad and Nick whacked the one remaining guard with a limb and a circling Huey picked him up.

Dimitri Khalezov explains about the nuclear-tipped "Granit" missile with 500 kiloton warhead used in the Pentagon attack.

I met Nick when he came to Monterey in ’87 to take a crash course in Tagalog at the Defense Language Institute. A mutual friend asked me to help him find a place to stay. Then he was off to a new job in Manila as the chief of the anti-terror unit of the Military Advisory Group. The Filipino Communists and the Vietnamese Communists very much wanted him assassinated, the latter just for old times’ sake. And he was, but not by them.


YouTube - Veterans Today -

On April 21, 1989 Nick was in an unprotected car supplied to him by the US Embassy in Manila. Bullet resistant cars for guys on the known assassination list were taken out of the budget. A car pulled up next to Nick’s car and opened fire with an M-16 and a .45. He was hit in the head and elsewhere and died instantly.

Willis Carto told me shortly after Nick was shot that the infamous Mossad agent, Mike Harari, had organized the assassination.

I have been fortunate to be in contact with Dimitri Khalezov, whose blockbuster revelations about 9-11 are about to change our perception of reality for the better just as profoundly as 9-11 changed them for the worse. He has revealed from first-hand knowledge that Mike Harari organized the 9-11 massacre. First-hand means in this case, Mike Harari told him.

The world first heard about Mike Harari during the US invasion of Panama in 1989. He was known in Panama as Mr. 60%, because that’s how much he took from any business deal done between Israel and Panama. He and Noriega split the take. The US invasion of Panama began at 0100 on December 20. Harari and a couple of Israeli colleagues had been warned hours earlier to get out but were caught at the airport by the 82nd Airborne. Here was the chief advisor to Manuel Noriega in drug smuggling and arms smuggling, the very crimes for which Liberace-Bush ordered the invasion. Once the paratroopers figured out who they had, they put him on the plane for Tel Aviv.

Dimitri Khalezov says that Harari told him in Bangkok that he had organized the 9-11 massacre. I mentioned Nick Rowe to Dimitri and he immediately confirmed that Harari had admitted this to him also. Harari said that he’d had to depart Manila for Bangkok because of an American colonel he’d assassinated there. Dimitri investigated and found that the colonel was James Nicholas Rowe. Harari’s actual assassin had been careless and had left clues that would tie him to the Israeli. So this shows that Dimitri truly had a confidential relationship with Mike Harari, who he says is an Israeli national hero smaller in stature only to Ben-Gurion or Golda Meir. His revelations about Harari must be taken very seriously, just as his explanations of the nuclear demolition of the three WTC buildings and the Granit missile attack on the Pentagon must be taken seriously. All in all, Dimitri Khalezov has solved the (so far) crime of the 21st Century.

Dimitri will be a guest on Kevin Barrett’s Truth Jihad radio show on Thursday February 10, 9-10AM, the first of no doubt many interviews to come.

Dimitri’s video series on the nuclear demolitions and the missile attack have been heavily suppressed by YouTube and Google over the past year, but are now quite available from various on-line sources. His latest interview is here.

His explanation is devastating in its simplicity. The conversion of three steel-built skyscrapers to fine powder is only possible with nuclear explosions underneath them. Thermite, nano-thermite and thermate may well have been used by the killers to cut beams and girders but they would not have turned concrete to powder, or steel for that matter. For those not familiar with his basic position, gained from his professional experience as a Soviet nuclear security officer, a joint US/USSR treaty called the Peaceful Use of Nuclear Explosions allowed the use of nukes for the demolition of tall buildings, specifically the WTC and Sears Tower in Chicago (which is now reportedly owned by Lucky Larry Silverstein). The New York Port Authority insisted that the architects provide a means for demolition of the buildings when their useful lives inevitably ended. The famous Maryland firm of Controlled Demolition, Inc – the Loizeaux family – came up with the nuclear demolition plan after the WTC architects could offer no other way to bring down their massively-built towers. Dimitri points out that this was a theoretical plan, made to satisfy the Port Authority that the buildings could be demolished. But the plan was there from the beginning. And it was Controlled Demolition, Inc that was put in charge of removing the debris of the 9-11 attack.

The twelve-foot round holes punched through six steel-reinforced structural walls of the three rings of the Pentagon could only have been produced by the seven-ton steel Granit (“Shipwreck”) naval cruise missile, which is designed to strike aircraft carriers right at the waterline. Hence, the very low entry point on the outer wall that left no damage to the lawn.

Dimitri has also been pressed into service to Viktor Bout, a fellow Russian who was lured into Bangkok by the Americans to be framed for supplying the stolen Granit missile, stolen from the sunken submarine Kursk. Dimitri says that the Granit that hit the Pentagon was carrying a disconnected 500 kiloton warhead that would have flattened Washington DC. The yield by comparison of our Hiroshima uranium bomb was estimated at 15 kilotons, or 15,000 tons of TNT. And our Nagasaki plutonium bomb’s yield was estimated at 21 kilotons. So, we can now grasp how easily our national capital could have been moved to Denver, as some say is the plan after the destruction of Washington DC.

The reader should become familiar with Dimitri Khalezov and his great contributions to our understanding what the hell happened on September 11, 2001.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Related Posts:



The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT, VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians, or the Veterans Today Network and its assigns. LEGAL NOTICE - COMMENT POLICY

Posted by on February 8, 2011, With 8191 Reads Filed under 9/11, WarZone. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

FaceBook Comments

154 Responses to "Dimitri Khalezov on 9-11"

  1. Joshua Fielden  March 31, 2011 at 10:35 am

    There is a picture of an excavator moving “Molten steel”. (1.40 minutes into the 1st Vid)
    1. That picture is fake. The orange color is what is fake. The picture was touched up with orange to make it look like there was molten steel. Unfortunately for the faker he didn’t know anything about hydraulic systems !
    2. The hydraulic system on the excavator would fail in less than a minute. YOU CANNOT USE AN EXCAVATOR TO MOVE MOLTEN STEEL.

    • Joshua Fielden  March 31, 2011 at 10:40 am

      More on this fakery on http://www.drjudywood.com.
      The whols site is worth spending time on to study her research.

  2. DR.NUR  March 12, 2011 at 5:22 pm

    Beslan School Massacre ..a Mistaravim black op
    3 posts – 2 authors – Last post: 25 May
    http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t152958/

    Zionists Nuke The Australian Embassy in Indonesia
    – [ Translate this page ]
    File Format: Microsoft Word – View as HTML
    Ketika mikro-nuklir meledak di Kedutaan Besar Australia Jakarta,
    ledakan bertekanan tinggi menghancurkan semua kaca jendela berlapisan
    tebal dan kuat pada …
    d.yimg.com/kq/groups/1016492/…/name/Zionis+Meledakkan+C-4.doc

    2002 Bali bomb and 2004 Jakarta were ‘ Micro Nukes ‘

    The attack

    At 10.30 a.m. local time on Thursday September 9, a miniature fireball
    formed in the sewers ten feet below the street outside the Australian
    Embassy in Jakarta, Indonesia. As the weapon went critical with an
    ultrasonic screech and the fireball reached half the temperature of
    the sun, a huge chunk of atomized roadbed was blown out at nearly one
    million feet per second, shaking the ground up to one mile away, and
    causing hearing impairment at ranges out to five miles.
    Originally Posted by Mark Twain
    At 10.30 a.m. local time on Thursday September 9, a miniature fireball
    formed in the sewers ten feet below the street outside the Australian
    Embassy in Jakarta, Indonesia. As the weapon went critical with an
    ultrasonic screech and the fireball reached half the temperature of
    the sun, a huge chunk of atomized roadbed was blown out at nearly one
    million feet per second, shaking the ground up to one mile away, and
    causing hearing impairment at ranges out to five miles.

    http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/msg115464.html

    Beslan Psyop and Jakarta Nuke Reports

    As with the Beslan report above, my analysis of the micro nuke outside
    the Australian Embassy in Jakarta, Indonesia, has been delayed by the

    earthhopenetwork.net/forum/showthread.php?tid=3851 – Cached
    Get more discussion results
    #
    Micro Nukes (WMD) in the WTC – 911 Inside/Outside Job | Wake Up …
    26 Mar 2008 … Another Vialls’ article dealing with the supposed
    vehicle bombing of the Australian embassy in Jakarta, “Zionists Nuke
    the Australian …
    wakeupfromyourslumber.com/node/6209 – Cached

    http://www.forumpakistan.com/marriott-bombmossad-pulls-off-another-false-flag-operation-t15930.html

  3. Dr.Nur  February 27, 2011 at 5:42 am

    Exactly the syndrome of death by “strange weapon”: soft-pulverized-bones-blood-dripping-at-mouth were seen in the civilian genocide of Fallujah and Gaza and the battles of Baghdad and Kabul where micronukes/neutron bombs were used by the sisters-mothers of international talmudic narcopetrol terrorism … Another testimony to their war crimes files.

  4. Stratus Blue  February 25, 2011 at 11:16 pm

    Nice moderation of comments Mr. Campbell. In 1984, while Dimitri was detecting nuclear tests as a career, and with his co-workers discussing the nuclear demolition plans at Sears Tower & WTC, I was a Radiation Protection Tech at Three Mile Island. As a result of that nuclear plant’s catastrophic failure a need for Rad Techs in the USA sky rocketed which I helped fill. 5 years after the accident, while I worked there, the “recovery effort” focused on establishing tunnel routes for robots to go where no human could go. My co-workers were a cross section of USA Army Nuclear Test veterans and Rickover’s swabbies from HIS nuclear navy. Just as Dimitri was aware of Operation Plowshares and its application, I learned of the phenomena whereby pulverization of rigid material could be achieved without obliteration of surrounding less rigid material. The example I was enlightened by involved pigs. At certain distance from ground zero, shielded from the direct effects, the bones of the pigs were pulverized and yet contained within their flesh. This was tested and retested. On 9-11 we witnessed the application of what was learned from that testing but kept secret from 99% of humanity. The curve of binding energy is only a starting point for study. If you cannot explain what holds matter in place, you will not comprehend what tore the WTC apart.

  5. DR.NUR  February 25, 2011 at 8:37 am

    FOR CONFIRMATION OF PREPLANNED DEMOLITION PLANS AT THE BUILDING TIME OF WTC,HERE IT IS!! AND KHALEZOV IS RIGHT AND I FOUND THIS MYSELF. HE WAS STILL A TEEN AT THE TIME AND SO WAS I. SO HE DID NOT MAKE IT UP. PLEASE READ THIS CAREFULLY HERE AND THOSE WHO ARE TOO LAZY TO READ SWITCH TO HARD LIQUOR THANKS.. AND THOSE WHO KEEP DENYING WE WILL KNOW WHO ARE THE HEAVY DRINKERS!: http://Www.just-another-inside-job.blogspot.com/2007/04/building-wtc-to-detonate-it.html
    and http://www.factsnotfairies.blogspot.com

  6. Edward Rynearson  February 21, 2011 at 1:28 pm

    February 17, 2011 – Kevin Barrett Show
    Kevin Barrett speaks with intelligence community whistleblower Dmitri Khalezov and Veterans Today editor Gordon Duff. They discuss whether an infamous Mossad agent named Mike Harari brag of organizing 9/11? Dmitri Khalezov, author of The Third Truth About 9/11, was arrested in Thailand along with Mike Harari. Khalezov says Harari was his friend at the time of 9/11, invited him to a party on 9/12/01 celebrating the successful operation, and subsequently let it be known, in so many words, that he, Harari, was an organizer of the 9/11 false-flag event. Gordon Duff, editor of Veterans Today, knows the intelligence community well and says Khalezov should be taken seriously as a potential witness in the 9/11 mass murder case.
    http://eddieleaks.org/barrett-khalezov-duff/

  7. DR.NUR  February 17, 2011 at 5:33 pm

    http://www.ghosttroop.net link for survivor of american nukes in Baghdad

  8. Tom Mysiewicz  February 13, 2011 at 4:05 pm

    The nano-thermite, which I’m sure is present, only accounts for the softening/cutting of steel structural elements. It does NOT account for the huge amount of dust under 10 microns–detected by organizations such as USGS–characteristic of demolitions. Nor does it account for the simultaneous pulverization of 500,000 fluorescent lighting fixtures, releasing substantial amounts of mercury into the environment. Nor does it account for the fact that we have a 50-foot debris pile rather than a 50-story-high MOUNTAIN of debris with collapsed ceilings and office furniture. Sorry, but a lot of that mass simply disappeared into the dust that covered lower Manhattan. Why was it so important to get rid of the WTC steel QUICKLY? Could it be because nuclear detonations changed the isotope ratio in the steel? From my days covering industrial radiation processing, I recall that all iron of terrestrial origin has a set ratio of Fe isotopes with very long half lives–Fe-56, Fe-57, Fe-59 and Fe-60. (Meteorites and steel from nuclear blasts and space has a different ratio.) Only nuclear demolition could have accomplished what was done–the placement of tens of thousands of high-explosive charges would have been impossible.

  9. tom  February 12, 2011 at 3:24 pm

    Very good stuff. But: 1) Geiger and radiation detectors, like plain cameras too were banned on ground zero. Dmitri spends a few pages on this curious detail. 2) Most of the radiation was contained below the rubble. 3) An epidemiological study on survivors and first responders may be a good idea.

  10. DR.NUR  February 12, 2011 at 12:30 pm

    ANY DOUBTS?? MOSSAD’S WARNING TO DUBAI: A NUKE! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KRws9eHvVgw AND http://wn.com/DUBAI_EXPLOSION AND 1983 ARMY BARRACKS BEIRUT: http://www.disclose.tv/forum/dimitri-khalezov-wtc-nuclear-demolition-full-playlist-t21675.html
    Because the 1983 Beirut
    711 × 593 – 253 ko – gif
    bibliotecapleyades.net

  11. DR.NUR  February 12, 2011 at 10:39 am

    Marriot bombing Reply with quote
    Car or truck bombs DO NOT leave craters : EVER. Only explosive
    ordnance that is buried below ground or penetrates the ground (aerial
    bomb/ missile) will do this.
    The photo of the cars is a give-away. See the attached url for Dr.
    Judy Woods website that investigates the deployment of directed energy
    weapons for reference and comparisons of WTC 9/11 and the Marriot
    aftermath, especially the cars.
    http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/DEW/StarWarsBeam5.html
    My humble opinion, as a 60-years old retired military ordnance
    specialist : this one joins a long list of similars and has all the
    classic fingerprints of a Mossad false flag op.
    Crater and shearing / delaminating of vertical frontage of hotel : a
    micro nuke, slightly larger than the unit deployed by Mossad in Bali.
    Radioactive residues : very hard to pin down to the fact only Alpha
    radiation emitted.
    A Tesla / HAARP / Hutchinson effect type Scalar / directed energy
    weapon deployed in conjunction with Israeli-Dimona micro-nuke? Very
    likely.
    Rusty al Haq
    Mon Sep 22, 2008 11:05 pm View user’s profile Send private message
    #
    Joe Vialls Passed Away Today
    – 7:52am
    Oh and pdove: “Thanks for revealing that Bali bombing is the result of
    a small neutron bomb.” Indeed, but please do the man the honour of …
    http://www.iraq-war.ru/article/57230 – Cached – Similar

  12. DR.NUR  February 12, 2011 at 10:10 am

    http://mikephilbin.blogspot.com/2010/04/daniel-estulin-dmitri-khalezov-tag-team.html
    As to nukes under the WTC (150mt nukes!!LOL), sure there were, but
    they were micro nukes..like Bali, Oklahoma, Taba, Jakarta Australian
    Embbasy and Jakarta Marriott, to mention just a few.
    http://dkhalezov.com/

    http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=109250

    In 1993, Joe Vialls exposes some facts about single explosions that
    were very similar to the 2001 WTC bombing. The article, “Micro Nukes
    in London,” notes the sudden usage of massive explosions in business
    districts by the IRA with a brief mention of the 1993 bombing of the
    WTC. In the supposed first mega-bombing by the ‘IRA’, an eyewitness
    stated, “The ground shook under our feet. There was a brilliant white
    flash and a tall vertical column of smoke.” Significant information
    about the Special Atomic Demolition Munition (SADM – the general class
    of the W54 warhead). While the government was working on the usage of
    a conventional bomb to the corporate media, there was accidental
    filming of investigators of the bombing in full radiation protective
    gear. Description of the crater created by the second explosion
    reveals a hole 60 feet wide and 40 feet deep. Quotes of physicists’
    Galen Winsor, John McPhee and Theodore Taylor are prophetic for the
    usage of micro nukes. Taylor specifically notes the future usage of an
    extremely small micro nuke being used in the WTC in the year 1973.

    Another crater 22 feet wide and 5 feet deep is noted in the article
    “Bali Micro Nuke – Lack of Radiation Confuses Experts.” Within 48
    hours the Bali government found traces of C4 explosive. Next came the
    revised explanation of explosives on top of gas containers. After that
    failed to explain noted facts, the next theory was explosives with
    napalm. The final explanation from London quoted a reliable source
    that an IRA style bomb mixture was used. Still, there were significant
    problems with the story as the IRA had detonated 1,000 pounds of the
    mixture and there was no crater produced. The US bomb, BLU-82 – used
    for clearing helicopter landing zones in the jungles of Vietnam,
    contains 6.3 Tons of high grade military explosive with an aluminum
    additive for increased heat does not create a crater. The 1/4 inch
    steel encased explosive is parachuted to its target and detonated 1 to
    2 feet above ground. Approximately 40 people close enough to be
    vaporized simply vanished without a trace. Insights on Israel’s .01 kt
    Dimona nuke are also related in this article. According to the
    information presented, the bomb uses highly enriched Plutonium 239,
    99.78% pure, and only emits alpha radiation which is invisible to most
    Geiger counters.

  13. Shallel  February 12, 2011 at 12:42 am

    Good stuff but, “It seems the planes flew into those buildings using approach patterns that would rival the best “heavy” pilot skills available could be easily explained if we accept 1) the plains were be directed from somewhere other than their cabins, and 2) that the air defense drills were ordered to assure nothing interfered with their murderous robotic flight paths.”

    Having robotic control does dot alter the flight envelope of the aircraft.

  14. J. Bruce Campbell  February 11, 2011 at 4:48 pm

    Dimitri has corrected my seven points above. [My points are in brackets.]

    Hi Bruce.

    I received all your letters.

    Yes, you are right in using the word “cultivated” by the Mossad. This was exactly the case. But you know, I am not too “cultural” to be really cultivated. Many people had broken their teeth on me before and the Mossad will not be an exception to this rule. This is sure.

    Regarding the rest – please see my comments below:

    Friday, February 11, 2011, 2:04:15 AM, you wrote:

    [Hi, Dimitri –

    Spent the day reading all the deniers and attackers and your very good responses to them.] —– I will try to send you one more of such piece today. I am preparing one with answers to certain Yan Zeman – one of the recent most spiteful critics of mine. Hope to finish it soon, perhaps today.

    [I’m having the same stuff in the piece I wrote the other day so I put this in the comments:

    Dimitri has several main points that should be kept in mind.

    1. He was approached around January, 2001 by Mossad agents in Bangkok, who “befriended” him.] ————– no, the Mossad agents befriended me long before that. In 1997 I guess. In the beginning of 2001 it was Harari, but those who introduced me to him knew me long before that.

    [2. He was introduced by them to Mike Harari, who became very friendly and wanted to know from him, did the Soviet military know about the nuclear demolition plan for the WTC buildings? (answer: yes)] —————– this is correct.

    [3. On September 12, 2001 he was a guest of Harari and the other Mossadniks at a celebration of the successful attacks of the day before. Harari said happily that it was the greatest thing he had ever done.] ———————— no we were only three there – Harari, me and his son. The rest of the Mossad people are too young to be in friendly terms with Harari – it is just like captains in comparison with 4 star general. Subordination would not allow him to be so close with the rest. But with me personally it is another story – because we were friends (or at least so it seemed). When it comes to the rest of the Mossad operatives in Bangkok – they were indeed celebrating and I also saw it, but it was separately and later in the day. While Harari had a celebratory breakfast early in the morning 12 of September 2001 (about 6 AM or so Bangkok time), younger Mossad guys were celebrating it later in the day and in a different location.

    [4. The FBI had him and Harari, who used an Arabic name and French ID, arrested for extradition to the US for selling nuclear weapons to terrorists and for supplying false passports to them. Harari escaped but Dimitri did over a year in jail fighting extradition and was successful. It was during his time in jail that he decided to tell what he knew to the public, since the US authorities already knew the truth but were trying to frame him. Now they are framing Viktor Bout for the same thing, and he, too, is totally innocent.] ————————– more or less correct, but Harari did not actually “escape”. He just arranged an unprecedented trick by hiring someone to stay in prison in his stead and the Thais and the French just pretended “not to notice” this fact. When it comes to Victor – it is 100% correct.

    [5. Dimitri is simply saying that because of his highly-specialized work in the Soviet nuclear security department, the 12th Chief Directorate, he and his colleagues were aware of the decades-old nuclear demolition plan for the WTC towers and the Sears Tower in Chicago. He does not attempt to present himself as an expert in nuclear demolition able to answer myriad technical questions on every aspect of the demo job. Although mini-nukes have been used maybe a dozen times to wreck targets and slaughter people, the three WTC buildings are the only ones to his knowledge that were obliterated and turned to powder. He suspects that this will not be done again due to the catastrophic results which would be easily compared with 9-11. Mini-nukes, of course. But the WTC yields were 150 KT each.] —————— yes, this is correct. But I can’t say that am an expert in particularly “nuclear demolition” since such things were not even conceivable in the former USSR. I am not even a big specialist in nuclear weapons in general, to be honest, because I lack a special education in this field, but, still, I could say that I know about nuclear weapons more compare to just an approximate military officer, due to my specific position in service – as you can see I know the basics that allow me to explain the physics of underground nuclear explosions and nuclear weapons designs, for example (not enough knowledge to make the actual nuclear bomb, still, hope you realize this).

    [6. In 2007 he discovered the truth about the Granit naval cruise missile, which was that the 500 KT nuclear warhead was left on it as evidence to US officials that terrorists had one more in each WTC tower that if detonated would flatten NYC and this threat persuaded US officials to bring the towers down using the thermonuclear devices placed below the sub-basements. He doesn’t claim to know the motive for bringing down #7 other than to destroy evidence of the whole plot. The Granit missile in the Pentagon was necessary to bluff US officials to destroy the towers.] ————— no it was a bit earlier than that. I knew about the Granit missile from my conversations with Mike Harari in 2002-2003, though I did not suspect that the nuclear warhead was on. But I got to know about the nuclear warhead in 2005 only. And, still, only in 2007 I finally learned that the fact of the nuclear warhead was used as a prop to “convince” the US officials that other similar nukes were allegedly planted by “terrorists” in the upper floors of the Twins and were allegedly “about to explode.”

    [7. The Mossad had him as the perfect fall-guy, since the cruise missile was Soviet and “everybody knows” about all the mini-nukes for sale from the old Soviet Union. As he says, “It’s not that easy to find a former Soviet nuclear security officer.” But they did and brought the chief (Harari) in to make him part of the family. Harari wound up in Bangkok to escape justice in Manila for killing Nick Rowe.] ——————————– correct. I noticed (though belatedly) some dirty game around me with constant attempts to connect me to nuclear trade even back in the end of the 90s. But I duly appreciated all of that only after the Bali bombing of 2002 when I realized the game. I don’t think they would be able the “Granit” missile on me, it will be a bit too much. It was mini-nukes only. But when it comes to Victor Bout – yes, in his case they made him a complete “culprit” – just for everything ranging from the “Granit” missile to the “mini-nukes” and enriched Uranium of weapon-grade.

    [Dimitri, like Lee Oswald, was set up long in advance to take the fall for this monster crime that would put America in its long-planned war against Islam on behalf of Israel.] —————– looks like, at least to a certain extent.

    [If these are good, you might consider them as introductions to yourself, as they seem to me to be important points. Please correct any errors. I should have made it clearer that the WTC weapons were not mini-nukes, as far as I understand them, but rather conventional-sized devices.] ———— correct. The WTC demolition devices were by no means “mini-nukes”, but huge hydrogen charges, a size of a barrel each and with yields 150 times that of a “mini-nuke” set at its maximum yield – 1 kiloton.

    ADDITIONALLY. I strongly suggest you to download and look carefully at these photos:
    http://www.911-truth.net/911_molten_rock_on_ground_zero.zip

    I guess you will understand that it had nothing to do with “mini-nukes” (judging by the size of the cavities and by the amount of molten rock). Also you might be interested in this 1998 article:
    http://www.rossie.com/harari.htm

    If you can pass this info to those people who are about to make the today’s interview, I will greatly appreciate this, so that they could have some ideas or adjust their questions to these points.

    Sincerely yours,
    Dimitri.

    • J.F.E.  February 12, 2011 at 6:23 pm

      To Bruce and/or Dimitri:

      I appreciate the statements, answers, and followup. I hope this process continues because Mr. Khalezov has valuble information regarding his contacts with Mossad and senior Mossad agent Mike Harari.

      I do have a question for Dimitri (I apologize if this is in Dimitri’s book or video):

      How do you arrive at the 150 kiloton figure?

      Also, perhaps, Dimitri has reviewed this thread and read DR.NUR’s comments relating credible evidence about Israeli government, Mossad, use of micro-nukes. How much knowledge does Mr. Khalezov have about these micro-nukes?

      I guess the basis for my questions is this: Is it possible that Mr. Khalezov is correct about WTC being a nuclear demolition (in which I agree with him based on the facts & evidence from ground zero and immediate vicinity), but is not accurate about specifics?

      Obviously, Mr. Khalezov had nothing to do with the planning, preperation, and execution of the WTC 911 nuclear demolition. Mr. Khalezov does sound like he could have been a PLAN B patsy, as in, should somehow the PLAN A 19 arab hijackers, official story go awry, and not be available, or viable with the public, then Mr. Khalezov could be a viable back-up fall guy — anything to hide the truth and maintain plausible deniability for the conspirators.

      Mr. Khalezov is candid to state he, himself, is not a nuclear physicist, but had tactical nuclear knowledge & information due to his experience and posting in the Soviet Union’s military.

      The Mossad always seems to have something up their sleeve by way of deception.

      Is it possible that Mossad and the other conspirators had specific plans that Mr. Khalezov would not be aware of, and, also, be different from what Mr. Khalezov would expect based on his training & experience?

      After all, while the size & scope of the WTC destruction would be unprecedented, Mossad, apparently, had much actual practice & experience with micro-nuke field operations (successful nuclear detonations without getting caught or the method getting revealed). That practical experience may have led Mossad to devise unique ways & means to execute the attack and guarantee success (complete & total collapse while maintaining plausible deniability), which Mr. Dimitri Khalezov does not know about.

    • J. Bruce Campbell  February 13, 2011 at 2:18 pm

      J.F.E. says:

      uary 12, 2011 at 6:23 pm (Edit)

      To Bruce and/or Dimitri:

      I appreciate the statements, answers, and followup. I hope this process continues because Mr. Khalezov has valuble information regarding his contacts with Mossad and senior Mossad agent Mike Harari.

      I do have a question for Dimitri (I apologize if this is in Dimitri’s book or video):

      How do you arrive at the 150 kiloton figure?

      ————————————- I remembered this digit was discussed in my former organization – the Special Control Service. Besides, this digits corresponds to all visible effects (the cavity size and the earthquake intensity feeling), it also corresponds to the duration of time during which the hot matters remained hot at ground zero (as bigger is the yield as longer it will retain hot temperatures), and it also corresponded to logic – the 150 kiloton was the limit set by the Peaceful Nuclear Explosions Treaty, so they apparently used the very maximum of what was allowed by it, and, still, it was not enough to pulverize the entire Twin Towers, as you can see. They should use perhaps 200 kilotons, but they were allowed the maximum of 150. Hence my claims.

      Also, perhaps, Dimitri has reviewed this thread and read DR.NUR’s comments relating credible evidence about Israeli government, Mossad, use of micro-nukes. How much knowledge does Mr. Khalezov have about these micro-nukes?

      ————————————— I have some knowledge as a former officer of the organization dealing with nuclear weapons. Besides I just see the effects of these “car-bombings” with my very eyes (such as hundreds of tons of TNT yields, sizes of craters, “ground zero” definitions of the places of “car-bombings”, mushroom clouds, radiation sickness of people around, etc.), plus I had a several discussions with acting intelligence officers on this topic. All of it is more than enough to have an opinion.

      I guess the basis for my questions is this: Is it possible that Mr. Khalezov is correct about WTC being a nuclear demolition (in which I agree with him based on the facts & evidence from ground zero and immediate vicinity), but is not accurate about specifics?

      —————————– may be. But even if I am wrong is some particular details, the deviation from the reality is not big. I might, for example, mistakenly believe that it was 150 kiloton while it was 120 kiloton in reality, but by no means could I mistake a 150 kiloton thermo-nuclear explosion with a laughable 1 kiloton mini-nuke’s explosion.

      Obviously, Mr. Khalezov had nothing to do with the planning, preperation, and execution of the WTC 911 nuclear demolition. Mr. Khalezov does sound like he could have been a PLAN B patsy, as in, should somehow the PLAN A 19 arab hijackers, official story go awry, and not be available, or viable with the public, then Mr. Khalezov could be a viable back-up fall guy — anything to hide the truth and maintain plausible deniability for the conspirators.

      ———————– it seems that I was earmarked to serve as a “valuable useful idiot” indeed. First of all I am an extremist by nature which could be used to convince some stupid security officials that “as an extremely dangerous person I am indeed capable of anything awful”. Secondly, as a former officer of the 12th chief directorate, who has also an extremist nature and also very free-minded (read “criminally minded”) I could be easily used to blame on me anything like “nuclear terrorism”. It would look plausible. Thirdly, I was indeed involved in the fake passports trade in the 90s together with the Mossad operatives (I am quite free-minded in this sense since as a Christian I could remember that the Lord God has forgotten to supply Adam and Eve with passports upon their emplacement Here and so I don’t see anything really criminal in dealing with these illegal papers, I mean “illegal” in the God’s eyes) and the secret services knew about this fact very well. So it could be used to claim that I was allegedly the one who supplied the 9/11 hijackers and 2002 Bali bombers with fake passports. It is not true at all, but if someone would claim so it would sound plausible. And indeed they claimed exactly that – that it was exactly me (along with one Mossad agent) who allegedly supplied Hambali and 9/11 hijackers with fake passports. This is an “intermediate” level of the “truth”, of course, since serious guys knew that there were no “hijackers”, but the mid-ranking security officials would believe that. The only mistake was in the basic presumption – to use some one as a “useful idiot” you should first make sure that you are dealing with a real “idiot’. Since I am not the one, this method will not work with me personally and it will eventually lead to disastrous results – which you could see right now when I began to explain all of this to public.

      Mr. Khalezov is candid to state he, himself, is not a nuclear physicist, but had tactical nuclear knowledge & information due to his experience and posting in the Soviet Union’s military.

      —————– yes, this is exactly the case. But even what I know about nuclear weapons is more than enough to make certain conclusions.

      The Mossad always seems to have something up their sleeve by way of deception.
      Is it possible that Mossad and the other conspirators had specific plans that Mr. Khalezov would not be aware of, and, also, be different from what Mr. Khalezov would expect based on his training & experience?

      ——————————– I don’t know. But it seems to me that the Mossad attempted (back in the 1998-2002) to make me responsible for alleged selling of mini-nukes and nuclear materials to “terrorists”. I could see that if looking back now. And indeed they did their best in this – particularly by connecting me to the 2002 Bali bombing that is known to be nuclear to any and every security official. But it did not work anyway. I don’t know what other plans they could have. Because I am not too valuable, actually. I quitted a military service a very long time ago and unlikely I could be useful in any game (except, of course, only to make a mockery of the very game, such as is the case now).

      After all, while the size & scope of the WTC destruction would be unprecedented, Mossad, apparently, had much actual practice & experience with micro-nuke field operations (successful nuclear detonations without getting caught or the method getting revealed).

      ————————- the Mossad started to use their mini-nukes in disguise of “car-bombings” (thanks to the stupidity of Reagan’s Administration who preferred not to disclose the nuclear truth to the public) from the beginning of the ‘80s (mostly against their own friends – the Americans, of course). Thus the Israelis apparently have a big experience in this field. No doubt.

      That practical experience may have led Mossad to devise unique ways & means to execute the attack and guarantee success (complete & total collapse while maintaining plausible deniability), which Mr. Dimitri Khalezov does not know about.

      ——————————- it seems that the 9/11 affair was not planned by the Mossad (which is a small organization with limited human resources and also limited intellectual capabilities), but rather by the Freemasons in collaboration with the best thinking brains from among the NWO flock. And that is why 9/11 was planned so well (relatively “well” actually – they forgot that aluminum can not penetrate steel). The Mossad could only have a smaller part of this that had to do with the execution, but not with the planning. When it comes to my personal knowledge, I indeed don’t know much about this. All I know is about the fact that the “emergency nuclear demolition scheme” of the WTC existed and this was the matter of fact + that the Mossad was interested in this + that the WTC was finally demolished + that the Mossad was in a genuine celebratory mood over this otherwise awful fact. The rest are merely my conclusions as a researcher. Certainly I don’t know and I can’t know everything.

      That is what I could say in reply.

      Sincerely yours,

      Dimitri.

    • J.F.E.  February 14, 2011 at 2:38 pm

      Bruce, thank you for conveying my statements & questions to Mr. Khalezov and then placing Dimitri’s responses in the thread. Dimitri, thank you for responding. I appreciate your taking the time & effort to answer my questions.

      Hopefully, Veterans Today readers will see more from Dimitri Khalezov, when his experience, training, and former service in the Soviet Union’s military can shed light on a given situation — or any other post service experiences that can shed light on a given situation.

      Thanks, again.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login


TOP 50 READ ARTICLES THIS MONTH