9/11 RADIATION CANCER DEATHS CENSORED IN U.S.
By Gordon Duff STAFF WRITER/Senior Editor
When we were told that the 3 towers of the World Trade Center were destroyed by nuclear demolitions, possibly assisted by specialized thermite compounds, it began to make sense. When hundreds of firefighters died of radiation sickness and it was blamed on mysterious and unnamed and classified “toxic soup,” we had proof. When was reported in the London papers but not New York or anywhere else in America, it told us something is seriously wrong.
A decade after 9/11 and first responders are dying at unprecedented rates of cancers that could only be caused by high level exposure to radiation. This is hard science, not conjecture. The buildings, the 3 towers, hundreds of tons of steel vaporized, sites now duplicated only by Japan’s reactor meltdowns, radiated massive and continuing heat for over two months. 9/11 was a nuclear event.
If you are looking for proof of a coverup, simply check the news;
Pick up today’s New York Times. The “9/11” news: In Reversal, 9/11 Plotter to Be Tried by Military Panel
Pick up today’s UK Daily MAIL. The “9/11” news: 9/11 firefighters ARE getting cancer at a faster rate than others, chief medical officer reveals
Not reporting the cancers from ground zero, and let us be clear, they are radiation cancers, they are “radiation sickness,” has become “policy.” So far radiation cancers have killed at least 345 firefighters. Ten times that number may have died, misdiagnosed, or simply left off the lists.
This isn’t just a coverup, its one that “keeps on giving.” Those who need screening aren’t getting it. Ten years later, hiding the truth to “protect the public from panic” isn’t going to fly.
10,000 have sued with an undisclosed number having cancers and other “suspicious” illnesses tied to “ground zero.” The total numbers sick, in particular those who develop leukemia or other cancers over the the next decade and more could top 50,000.
This is the “why” that explains the censorship, the classified studies and the refusal to investigate 9/11 and the mysterious demolition of Building 7, the tower never hit by anything a building that came down though virtually untouched.
As Dr. Alan Sabrosky has said repeatedly, “If one tower was destroyed by controlled demolition, then all three were.”
Why is the issue radiation sickness if two airplanes took down three huge steel buildings? Oh, you didn’t know there were three buildings, not two? You may also have been unaware that the molten fires under “ground zero” were finally extinguished on December 15, 2001 though the jet fuel blamed on the destruction was burned off in less than 2 minutes at temperatures unable to warp the fender of a Yugo, much less vaporize hundreds of tons of 3 inch structural steel.
Then again, you are probably unaware that the FBI flew to Bangkok, Thailand in 2007, to interview former Soviet nuclear intelligence officer Dimitri Khalezov. Khalezov told them that he was briefed by the Soviet government, based on their treaty with the United States, of nuclear demolition charges embedded well below the WTC buildings, all of them.
Khalezov has agreed to take a lie detector test. Remember, Khalezov is the person who told us that Mike Harari, Mossad operations director, claimed responsibility for 9/11.
About a month ago, I learned, from the New York Times, that one firefighter had died of radiation cancer, multiple myeloma. Now I find the real number is admitted to be at least 345, a number that could only be possible if the firefighters were exposed to radiation from a nuclear blast within 72 hours of the explosion.
There is simply no other explanation, certainly not the “toxic soup” story being spread around.
If jet fuel caused cancer, we all would have been dead long ago, our air is filled with it. Was the World Trade Center a massive storage area for toxic chemicals as is claimed? Steel? Glass? Aluminum? Carpet? Particle board? Gypsum? Polystyrene? Shouldn’t we all be dead? Wouldn’t every house fire, ever smoldering junk pile be, by the standards of the Department of 9/11 Fantasy and Mythology, an environmental disaster?
I think we just covered 99% of it there, all things in any house fire, in fact much less dangerous than the typical house fire and absolutely nothing that causes Leukemia or Multiple Myeloma, the diseases killing off the New York City Fire Department and unknown “others” that nobody is tracking, nobody is checking on. We call those “others” the people of New York.
For those out there who still try to believe that airplanes knock down the largest steel buildings in the world, largest and strongest, that even buildings hit by nothing at all simply dissolve into their own sub-basements, the idea of nuclear weapons being used has to have a wild and conspiratorial sound.
Then again, there is proof, scientific proof, that and testimony.
Steel doesn’t dissolve on its own. Very little steel was hauled away from “ground zero.” Most simply disappeared. Yes, I have heard the story about the ship built “with” steel from the WTC. I also have seen the photos and heard the testimony of rivers of molten steel pouring off the building and burning for two months in the mysterious cavern below, a virtual volcano. Weeks later, workers had boots melt from the overheated soil. Jet fuel is kerosene. You can use it to start your barbeque. If it catches fire on your hands, put it out quickly or you might get burned.
A few weeks ago, as mentioned earlier, news crept out of a single firefighter dying of radiation sickness. At the same time, I reviewed Jeff Prager’s online magazine, Dust II. Prager had been way ahead of the curve on all of this.
I spent a couple of hours with Jeff Pragers “Dust I” and “Dust II” last night. This 108 page E-magazine, mostly science with amazing photos of “ground zero” from 9/11 is an analysis of the nuke v. thermite theories on 9/11. It is the first comprehensive piece on 9/11 that touches on absolutes, energy use, thermal energy and such. Some of the “hard science” checks out, enough to debunk NIST certainly. He is also fair and open on the thermite issue and leave the door open there as well. Prager makes a strong case for 9/11 being a nuke event. I sent it out to weapons science guys and will get back to you on this. What is clear is that there are more government spies involved in 9/11 theories than infiltrated the militia movements of the 80s and 90s. The medical evidence of radiation exposure at ‘ground zero’ is in already. First responders were “zapped.” Some reviews in this morning on Prager’s piece say he is abusing science more than a bit. Perhaps we have a potential debate going here…always a good thing.
So often I hear, “How could a nuclear weapon be exploded in New York City. Wouldn’t people die of leukemia and radiation exposure?”
Wouldn’t they, though.
Posted by Gordon Duff, Senior Editor on April 4, 2011, With 6366 Reads Filed under 9/11, WarZone. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.