Robert O’Dowd served in the 1st, 3rd and 4th Marine Aircraft Wings during 52 months of active duty in the 1960s. While at MCAS El Toro for two years, O'Dowd worked and slept in a Radium 226 contaminated work space in Hangar 296 in MWSG-37, the most industrialized and contaminated acreage on the base.

Robert is a two time cancer survivor and disabled veteran. Robert graduated from Temple University in 1973 with a bachelor’s of business administration, majoring in accounting, and worked with a number of federal agencies, including the EPA Office of Inspector General and the Defense Logistics Agency.

After retiring from the Department of Defense, he teamed up with Tim King of to write about the environmental contamination at two Marine Corps bases (MCAS El Toro and MCB Camp Lejeune), the use of El Toro to ship weapons to the Contras and cocaine into the US on CIA proprietary aircraft, and the murder of Marine Colonel James E. Sabow and others who were a threat to blow the whistle on the illegal narcotrafficking activity. O'Dowd and King co-authored BETRAYAL: Toxic Exposure of U.S. Marines, Murder and Government Cover-Up. The book is available as a soft cover copy and eBook from See:

View Latest Posts >>>

Veterans Exposed To Enviromental Hazards

by Robert O’Dowd

Veterans injured from environmental hazards need health care now.

(WASHINGTON, DC) – Former Marine Corps Air Station El Toro, California, is a safer environment today than prior to its closure in July 1999. Since the 1980s, the Navy spent hundreds of millions on remediation work at the base.

When El Toro made the National Priority List (NPL) in 1990, the government knew the extensive contamination on the base was a serious health hazards for those living and working on the base with 25 contaminated sites. The exposure to contaminants in the air, soil, and groundwater exposed the base’s population to the risks of injury and premature death. Veterans of El Toro and other NPL military installations (EPA Superfunds) are left to their own resources to pay for expensive health care or turn to a too often hostile VA for critical health care.

With the exception of Camp Lejeune, the government has not notified any veterans of the NPL military sites of their possible exposure to environmental hazards and their health effects.

The Navy and Marine Corps have steadfastly refused to accept responsibility for injuries from the contaminated water wells at Camp Lejeune.  The base’s wells were contaminated with volatile organic compounds and benzene over a 30 year period (1957-1987).  Some have even accused the Corps of running a public relations program when they are faced with a public health problem.


The government spent millions in remediation at both bases but no efforts were made to contact Veterans and dependents of their possible exposure to contaminants until Congressional interest in contaminated water wells at Camp Lejeune forced the Marine Corps to take action to contact former Camp Lejeune Veterans and dependents.

There’s no medical monitoring or health care for those injured at either base, and hundreds of Federal tort claims for Camp Lejeune have been filed with the Navy JAG. No action has been taken on the tort claims.  At the moment, they are just dust collectors.  Claimants have the right to pursue action in Federal court after six months and a few have taken that step.

Legislation was introduced in Congress to provide for medical care for Camp Lejeune Veterans and their dependents injured from the base’s contaminated water wells through the Department of Veterans Affairs. There is no effort underway to provide for similar injuries for those with exposure to toxins at El Toro.

The Navy and EPA deny former MCAS El Toro’s base wells were contaminated and may have been abandoned very early when municipal water was purchased but the evidence doesn’t support this position.

Starting with the Navy’s well destruction process in 1998, the Navy avoided looking for the locations of El Toro’s well screen intervals after an inspection of one well found the well screen opened in the contaminated aquifer. The risk that the remaining wells had well screens opened in the contaminated SGU (Shallow Groundwater Unit) was obvious.

All of the El Toro’s original well construction drawings are missing, together with several decades of water distribution engineering drawings. A major TCE plume cut a path right through the base wells. TCE averaged 50 ug/L to 500 ug/L in the area of the base wells. This is 10 to 100 times the EPA Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL). Only a physical inspection of the wells could determine the locations of the well screens.  Never happened.  The Navy sealed all the wells in concrete; the last two in 2007.  If you’re thinking ‘government cover-up,’ you’re on target.

At Camp Lejeune, the contamination of the base wells with organic solvents and benzene is a documented fact. The contamination covered a 30 year period from 1957 until 1987 and may have exposed as many as one million people to toxic chemicals. The Marine Corps refuses to accept responsibility for any injuries and deaths from Lejeune’s well water. Senator Daniel Akaka, the former Chairman of the Veterans Affairs Committee, after hearing testimony on Lejeune’s contamination said that the Marine Corps had been less than forthright.

The number of injuries and deaths from both bases could have been mitigated with medical care monitoring. With 130 military bases on the NPL, the Defense Department faces a huge potential liability from dependents and civilian workers (the only ones who can file tort suits). This may be the raison d’etre for the Marine Corps’ refusal to accept responsibility for injuries from Lejeune’s contaminated wells. To do so, may open the door to millions of others who were exposed to Contaminants of Concern on 130 NPL military installations and were seriously injured from these exposures.

MilSpeak will publish in October or November 2011, A Few Good Men, Too Many Chemicals The book was coauthored by Tim King, an El Toro veteran and founder of, and me  to alert those who were stationed at these two Marine bases and all military installations on the NPL of the contamination they may have been exposed to and their health effects; to solicit Congressional support to require the VA to provide medical care monitoring and health care for those injured by exposure to environmental hazards; to provide scientific expertise within the VA to fairly evaluate Veterans Disability and Compensation claims for current medical conditions linked to exposures to Contaminants of Concern at military installations on the NPL and elsewhere; and to require the VA and the Veteran Service Organizations (VSOs) to establish internet links on their websites to all NPL military installations on the EPA Superfund database. The internet links provide lists of contaminants found on the NPL sites and the health effects of exposure. The websites can then be easily accessed by private health care providers and the VA medical doctors and may be especially helpful to medical care providers in determining the cause of Veterans’ medical conditions and the best treatment options.

The VA needs expertise from scientists with backgrounds in environmental exposure or environmental assessment, heath monitoring, and other relevant fields to make fair and unbiased decisions on military installations where there’s evidence of probable exposure to environmental hazards.

Scientists with these skills and under the authority of the VA need subpoena authority to require testimony from witnesses and to obtain information on Contaminants of Concern on military installations resident in DOD databases or in dusty file cabinets. Their mission would be to provide expert recommendations to the VA Regional Offices on VA Disability and Compensation claims for exposure to environmental hazards at NPL military installations and elsewhere.

The Navy and Marine Corps and Congress are faced with the choice of ‘doing the right thing’ by supporting efforts to provide medical care and  compensation to those injured from exposure to environmental hazards while on active duty or facing the backlash from veterans for not doing so.

With the exception of the two senators from North Carolina and Congressman Brad Miller and their co-sponsors on two bills introduced in the 112th Congress, there’s no interest in increasing the national debt to pay for veterans and their dependents injured on Superfund installations.  Senators Richard Burr and Kay Hagan and Congressman Miller may be forced to seek unpopular  offsets in other programs to pay for the Camp Lejeune heath care for veterans and their dependents.

The facts are that Marine Veterans and dependents were exposed to toxic chemicals at both El Toro and Camp Lejeune. The routes of exposure  through ingestion in the water wells are clearly documented at Camp Lejeune and hidden in a fog of missing documentation at El Toro, but nevertheless present.

Readers can help bring about these necessary changes by writing their Congressional and VSO representatives, asking for their support for the VA to:

  1. Provide health care screenings for those possibly exposed to environmental hazards at military installations and health care coverage for those with medical conditions linked to exposure to environmental hazards;
  2. Establish a group of scientists with expertise in environmental exposure or environmental assessment, health monitoring, and other relevant fields to make recommendations to the VA’s Regional Offices on the evidence of exposure to assist them in determining if the VA standard of “at least as likely as not” is met; and
  3. Establish internet links on the VA website to the EPA Superfund database for NPL military
    installations and encourage the VSOs to establish links on their websites.



Related Posts:

The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT, VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians, or the Veterans Today Network and its assigns. LEGAL NOTICE - COMMENT POLICY

Posted by on August 6, 2011, With 1279 Reads Filed under Of Interest. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

FaceBook Comments

7 Responses to "Veterans Exposed To Enviromental Hazards"

  1. Tbrass  July 20, 2015 at 10:00 am

    I was first stationed at Edwards AFB prior to being sent to Vietnam. I was later(A few Years later) Sent to MCRD Parris Island for basic training again and sent to Camp Johnson for school, and Camp Lejeune for my duty station. After almost 4 years at Camp Lejeune NC, I was sent to Camp Pendleton CA. After a few years there I was sent to Okinawa, Japan for a year only to return stateside to be stationed at MCLB, Barstow Ca. until my discharge. Not sure about Okinawa, but the rest of these places that I was sent to, the Superfund bases I found out, are known sites of environmental pollutants and exposure to service members, but so far, they will only discuss or recognize Camp Lejeune NC, the death place of my newborn daughter. My ex-wife who was also a service member has suffered other illnesses not counting the loss of our child. All trust is just about gone.

  2. David C. Miller  August 29, 2011 at 2:15 pm

    I am a Vietnam veteran that was stationed at Okinawa, Japan almost 4 years and exposed to agent orange shipping deceased marines personal effects home. Sent in a claim and will probably be denied due to not having boot’s on the ground in Vietnam. I then spent the last 2 years in Camp Lejeune and probably will not see any results from this. Yet we still need to go on with the fight to help future military and family receive those benefits well deserved for serving there Country. I still love this Country but you will always have those who believe money is more than life. Go to Camp Lejeune water contamination to learn more. Continue your fight for what is right.

  3. Rilla Surber  August 11, 2011 at 3:36 pm

    Ft. McClellan, AL was also declared a super fund site a few years ago. The towns people were paid, but not a single person who was stationed there has ever been compensated until this year when 2 men were approved for exposure.

    I got sick at Ft. McClellan in 1973 – I’m STILL SICK TODAY. I can’t even file for Service connected disability because it would be automatically denied. I’ve have gotten sicker as the years pass.

    If you have joined the Military – or let your daughters or sons join today – you have most likely thrown away your life! The US Government sees you as collateral damage … and not worth the time and money it would take to honor THEIR end of the contract you signed.

    Just the truth –

  4. Glenn Thrasher  August 8, 2011 at 1:54 pm

    During WW2 the Army poisioned thousands of soldiers and civilians in Gadsden Al st Camp Sibert in secret chemical warfare training, useing mustard, lewisite, phosegene, and other toxins, after the war they buried hundreds of drums of chemicals all over Gadsden,Attalla, and other areas, hundreds of civilians have died, most of the troops died of cancer, many had brain damage, the Army is cleaning it up but is goining to take 30 more years, Joe Louis was one of the troops poisioned at Camp Sibert. Google Camp Sibert and see some of the reports

  5. Robert Lee Mason  August 7, 2011 at 9:30 pm

    Don’t bother telling anyone at the VA hospital Cleveland, Ohio that you were exposed to chemical. They will only laugh at you and say you are making up a story. i went to them what a waste of good time.

    • Rilla Surber  August 11, 2011 at 3:38 pm

      Robert – You aren’t the only one who has been laughed at. I’ve been laughed at in Montana, so it’s not just Ohio.

  6. Jim Davis  August 6, 2011 at 9:07 pm

    And if you can’t go to their offices or send letters or faxes, when they return to DC you can always call them toll FREE at 866-272-6622.

    It’s imperative we all help each other to the best of our abilities!

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

From Veterans Today Network