JOIN TEAM VT | SIGN UP DAILY NEWSLETTER
VETERANS TODAY ON : FACEBOOK | TWITTER | VT FORUM
|

The Shocking Truth About the Crackdown on Occupy

The violent police assaults across the US are no coincidence. Occupy has touched the third rail of our political class’s venality.

 

By Naomi Wolf, Guardian UK

 

He Thought He Was Exercising Some Authority - But Got Suspended Along with the UC Davis Police Chief

US citizens of all political persuasions are still reeling from images of unparallelled police brutality in a coordinated crackdown against peaceful OWS protesters in cities across the nation this past week.

An elderly woman was pepper-sprayed in the face.The scene of unresisting, supine students at UC Davis being pepper-sprayed by phalanxes of riot police went viral online

Images proliferated of young women – targeted seemingly for their gender – screaming, dragged by the hair by police in riot gear; and the pictures of a young man, stunned and bleeding profusely from the head, emerged in the record of the middle-of-the-night clearing of Zuccotti Park.

But just when Americans thought we had the picture – was this crazy police and mayoral overkill, on a municipal level, in many different cities? – the picture darkened.

The National Union of Journalists and the Committee to Protect Journalists issued a Freedom of Information Act request to investigate possible federal involvement with law enforcement practices that appeared to target journalists.

The New York Times reported that “New York cops have arrested, punched, whacked, shoved to the ground and tossed a barrier at reporters and photographers” covering protests.

Reporters were asked by NYPD to raise their hands to prove they had credentials: when many dutifully did so, they were taken, upon threat of arrest, away from the story they were covering, and penned far from the site in which the news was unfolding.

Poet Robert Hass - Beaten Up By Occupy Cops

Other reporters wearing press passes were arrested and roughed up by cops, after being – falsely – informed by police that “It is illegal to take pictures on the sidewalk.”

In New York, a state supreme court justice and a New York City council member were beaten up; in Berkeley, California, one of our greatest national poets, Robert Hass, was beaten with batons.

The picture darkened still further when Wonkette and Washingtonsblog.com reported that the Mayor of Oakland acknowledged that the Department of Homeland Security had participated in an 18-city mayor conference call advising mayors on “how to suppress” Occupy protests.

To Europeans, the enormity of this breach may not be obvious at first. Our system of government prohibits the creation of a federalised police force, and forbids federal or militarised involvement in municipal peacekeeping.

I noticed that right wing pundits and politicians on the TV shows on which I was appearing were all on-message against OWS. Journalist Chris Hayes reported on a leaked memo that revealed lobbyists vying for an $850,000 contract to smear Occupy.

This Balogna Cop Got Docked a Few Sick Days

Message coordination of this kind is impossible without a full-court press at the top. This was clearly not simply a case of a freaked-out mayors’, city-by-city municipal overreaction against mess in the parks and cranky campers.

As the puzzle pieces fit together, they began to show coordination against OWS at the highest national levels.

Why this massive mobilisation against these not-yet-fully-articulated, unarmed, inchoate people?

After all, protesters against the war in Iraq, Tea Party rallies and others have all proceeded without this coordinated crackdown. Is it really the camping?

As I write, two hundred young people, with sleeping bags, suitcases and even folding chairs, are still camping out all night and day outside of NBC on public sidewalks – under the benevolent eye of an NYPD cop – awaiting Saturday Night Live tickets, so surely the camping is not the issue.

I was still deeply puzzled as to why OWS, this hapless, hopeful band, would call out a violent federal response.

That is, until I found out what it was that OWS actually wanted.

The mainstream media was declaring continually “OWS has no message”. Frustrated, I simply asked them. I began soliciting online “What is it you want?” answers from Occupy.

In the first 15 minutes, I received 100 answers. These were truly eye-opening.

The No 1 agenda item: get the money out of politics. Most often cited was legislation to blunt the effect of the Citizens United ruling, which lets boundless sums enter the campaign process.

No 2: reform the banking system to prevent fraud and manipulation, with the most frequent item being to restore the Glass-Steagall Act – the Depression-era law, done away with by President Clinton, that separates investment banks from commercial banks. This law would correct the conditions for the recent crisis, as investment banks could not take risks for profit that create kale derivatives out of thin air, and wipe out the commercial and savings banks.

No 3 was the most clarifying: draft laws against the little-known loophole that currently allows members of Congress to pass legislation affecting Delaware-based corporations in which they themselves are investors.

When I saw this list – and especially the last agenda item – the scales fell from my eyes. Of course, these unarmed people would be having the shit kicked out of them.

For the terrible insight to take away from news that the Department of Homeland Security coordinated a violent crackdown is that the DHS does not freelance. The DHS cannot say, on its own initiative, “we are going after these scruffy hippies”.

DHS - Has It Become a Threat to the Public

Rather, DHS is answerable up a chain of command: first, to New York Representative Peter King, head of the House homeland security subcommittee, who naturally is influenced by his fellow congressmen and women’s wishes and interests.

And the DHS answers directly, above King, to the president (who was conveniently in Australia at the time).

In other words, for the DHS to be on a call with mayors, the logic of its chain of command and accountability implies that congressional overseers, with the blessing of the White House, told the DHS to authorise mayors to order their police forces – pumped up with millions of dollars of hardware and training from the DHS – to make war on peaceful citizens.

But wait: why on earth would Congress advise violent militarised reactions against its own peaceful constituents?

The answer is straightforward: in recent years, members of Congress have started entering the system as members of the middle class (or upper middle class) – but they are leaving DC privy to vast personal wealth, as we see from the “scandal” of presidential contender Newt Gingrich’s having been paid $1.8m for a few hours’ “consulting” to special interests.

The inflated fees to lawmakers who turn lobbyists are common knowledge, but the notion that congressmen and women are legislating their own companies’ profits is less widely known – and if the books were to be opened, they would surely reveal corruption on a Wall Street spectrum.

Indeed, we do already know that congresspeople are massively profiting from trading on non-public information they have on companies about which they are legislating – a form of insider trading that sent Martha Stewart to jail.

Since Occupy is heavily surveilled and infiltrated, it is likely that the DHS and police informers are aware, before Occupy itself is, what its emerging agenda is going to look like.

An Ex-Congressman - Or Just an Influence Peddler?

If legislating away lobbyists’ privileges to earn boundless fees once they are close to the legislative process, reforming the banks so they can’t suck money out of fake derivatives products, and, most critically, opening the books on a system that allowed members of Congress to profit personally – and immensely – from their own legislation, are two beats away from the grasp of an electorally organised Occupy movement … well, you will call out the troops on stopping that advance.

So, when you connect the dots, properly understood, what happened this week is the first battle in a civil war; a civil war in which, for now, only one side is choosing violence.

It is a battle in which members of Congress, with the collusion of the American president, sent violent, organised suppression against the people they are supposed to represent.

Occupy has touched the third rail: personal congressional profits streams. Even though they are, as yet, unaware of what the implications of their movement are, those threatened by the stirrings of their dreams of reform are not.

Sadly, Americans this week have come one step closer to being true brothers and sisters of the protesters in Tahrir Square.

Like them, our own national leaders, who likely see their own personal wealth under threat from transparency and reform, are now making war upon us.

Bookmark and Share

Short URL: http://www.veteranstoday.com/?p=166414

The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT or any other VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners and technicians. Legal Notice

Posted by on Nov 29 2011, With 0 Reads, Filed under Editor, Of Interest. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

COMMENTS

To post, we ask that you login using Facebook, Yahoo, AOL, or Hotmail in the box below.
Don't have a social network account? Register and Login direct with VT and post.
Before you post, read our Comment Policy - Feedback

Comments Closed

2 Comments for “The Shocking Truth About the Crackdown on Occupy”

  1. The whole thing does sound like planned DHS psychodrama to inure us to the coming police state already enacted with the Patriot Act, MCA, ad nauseam. I can’t get my mind around the kind of person a cop has to be to dress up like Darth Vader and brutalize mostly young citizens exercising their right to peaceable assembly. On the other hand, I do believe OWS was originally organized by George Soros and other groups looking to overthrow the government.

    A hundred years ago Wilson ran on the promise to clean up Wall Street and keep us out of war, but gave us the Federal Reserve, and lied us into WW I. Obama ran on the promise to clean up Wall Street and keep us out of war, but bails out Wall Street, and is lying us into WW III. What a joke democracy is in this country, and has been for a century. Imagine the DHS/police response to peaceable assembly if that grinning fascist Gingrich gets elected.

Comments are closed

 

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Join Our Daily Newsletter
  View Newsletter ARCHIVE

WHAT'S HOT

  1. Mishap Over Russia
  2. Finally, Some Really Good News
  3. Anti-Zionism Continues to Rise
  4. Putin: ‘US wants to subdue Russia, but no one did or ever will’
  5. Amazing Military Spouses Super Connect Helping U.S. Veterans
  6. NEO – USS Liberty Film Only a First Step
  7. More JFK mysteries solved: The second limo stop and holding back the Altgens6
  8. City to recognize ‘outstanding’ veterans
  9. Blue Gun Wednesday
  10. The “grassy knoll” rider and JFK limo back seat: Just how crowded was it?
  11. NEO – ISIL attacked Saudi Arabia
  12. VetLikeMe Weekly 10/16/2014
  13. Defeating AEGIS, the US Naval Boondoggle
  14. Veterans Of Oakley – Dedicated To Service
  15. Hamas and Fatah: Unfit to lead let alone liberate!
  16. EU mulls imposing sanctions against Israel
  17. WTC Demolition Participant Murdered?
  18. Mossad Targets Nuclear Engineers in Damascus
  19. It’s Time to Strike At the Root
  20. VT Mourns: Major Raja Mujtaba Dead
  1. markpeters: You are ringing the final bell.I have been studying all possibilities as to the best move for the average joe.I think a great deal can be done by enough angry ...
  2. jake gittes: The more I study Altgens 6, the more EVERYTHING in the doorway looks suspect. First, Doorman's left arm is Inspector Gadget-like in how it goes on forever, from his ...
  3. Preston James, Ph.D: Another most excellent article. 9/11/01 is going to be the undoing of these little cry-baby self-centered, narcissistic criminal sociopaths aka the Dreadful Few World Zionists who work out of Israel ...
  4. jensingr: I know right? Calling someone a "CIA crook" sounds like a rant not sophisticated verbiage from an astute financial attorney! and not that everyone who attended Yale is Skull and ...
  5. Joanna Mccain: E1.RU posted another video from the same event I would assume https //www.youtube.com/watch?v=w1VpXeo2gKA Obviously it is not much to it judging by the voices of the persons witnessing it... fireworks display amusement.

Veterans Today Poll

For over 60 years, US Taxpayers have been funding Israel, Palestine and Middle East. Are you happy with return on investment or would you prefer those monies be invested at home instead?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Archives