Iran War: US Eyes Covert Ops and Mideast Gendarme Role
By Dr. Ismail Salami
The temptation of attacking Iran long entertained by Washington and Israel is gradually crystallizing into a reality of fear and angst and has already become an alarmingly worrisome idea even for those who are wont to see the glass half full.
Amidst an escalating crisis following an exchange of threats between Washington and Tehran, US Army Gen. Martin Dempsey has visited Israel to discuss what is claimed to be an effort to stop a possible Israeli attack on Iranian nuclear sites. This is at least what Western media has been reporting with the manifest purpose of depicting the US government as Mr. Nice Guy who wishes to stop an Israeli attack without having any intention of its own to participate in another military expedition in the Middle East. Is this a sudden political volte face?
Indeed, Washington has been acting very strangely lately.
US President Barack Obama has recently sent a letter to the Leader of the Islamic Revolution Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei through three different channels; the Swiss envoy to Tehran Livia Leu Agosti–the United States’ official diplomatic proxy in Iran; Obama’s UN envoy Susan Rice and the Iranian mission to the United Nations in New York Mohammad Khazaei and Iraqi President Jalal Talabani. The letter is reportedly an invitation to talks between the two parties in order to resolve the so-called nuclear stand-off. Strange as it may be, Swiss envoy to Tehran Livia Leu Agosti delivered the letter to Iran and reportedly quoted Obama as saying, “We (the US) have recognized Iran’s nuclear rights.”
Yet, in another development of note, an article appears on Foreign Policy and suggests that the Mossad agents passed themselves off as CIA operatives, approached and hired some elements of the Jundallah terrorist group in order to carry out acts of terrorism in Iran. Parenthetically, Jundallah, an offshoot of al-Qaeda and a favorite of the US government, is an anti-Iran terrorist group based in Baluchistan of Pakistan which has repeatedly embarked on spree of assassinations (from women and children to government officials) in Iran.
As to the report in Foreign Policy, there are two assumptions:
1. Why should the Mossad agents pass themselves off as CIA operatives in the first place? Does it mean that the Jundallah terrorists would have acted differently if they had been approached by Mossad agents directly? Well, the answer is no. Terrorists are terrorists and there is no point in thinking that they would say ‘yes’ to one spy agency and ‘no’ to another. In case of Jundallah which follows no other agenda but to inflict a lethal blow on Iran, it seems quite far-fetched to imagine that their ultimate objectives would be in substantial conflict with those of the Mossad.
2. Even if we naively concur with the assumption that Mossad agents engaged in some sort of ‘false flag operation’ (as Mark Perry artfully proposes to convey) in recruiting the Jundallah elements, we are left with yet another bigger question: does this exonerate the CIA in their sabotage activities in Iran? Is this meant to direct all the blame for the assassinations in Iran on Israel and cleanse instead the notorious CIA considering the fact that the duo for the most part (at least on the Iran’s issue) have worked in collusion with each other? Let us not forget that only in recent weeks, US Republicans have openly asked the US government to engage in more nuclear assassinations. Behind this arras of political chicanery, one tends to see a mega plot intelligently being woven.

Abdolmalek Rigi, head of the terrorist group Jundallah who embarked on a series of terrorist activities in Iran until he was hanged on June 20, 2010.
Mark Perry’s article on Foreign Policy titled ‘False Flag’ (13 January) contains an interesting point which needs critical attention. The writer builds his claim on the basis of what he has gained from two unnamed intelligence officials who refer to a series of memos “buried deep in the archives of America’s intelligence services”. These two hypothetical figures, “one of whom has read the memos and another who is intimately familiar with the case,” say the “Israelis, flush with American dollars and toting US passports, posed as CIA officers in recruiting Jundallah operatives-what is commonly referred to as a “false flag” operation.”
While the article is per se an open confession to covert operations including assassinations carried out by the Mossad against the Iranian people, it does not render null and void the important role of the CIA in the sabotage activities in Iran. So the report by Mr. Perry does little to change the situation in favor of Washington.
Be that as it may, the US agenda on Iran is heavily influenced and determined by Israel; the US is the body which cannot be separated from its head i.e. Israel. In fact, Washington and Tel Aviv abide by an ominous shared agenda on Iran: war.
A war in the Middle East region, especially if waged on Iran which wields powerful influence, will draw Washington closer to its ultimate objective: global hegemony.
With the Middle East in turmoil, the US will avail itself of the opportunity to set the wheels in motion, indulge in its expansionist polices and play the role of Middle East gendarme.
These new attempts are only new ruses to temporarily alleviate international concerns over another round of US-led adventurism.
But isn’t it easy to see the horror on the horizon?
Short URL: http://www.veteranstoday.com/?p=180206
Posted by Dr. Ismail Salami on Jan 21 2012, With 0 Reads, Filed under Iran, World. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
COMMENTS
To post, we ask that you login using Facebook, Yahoo, AOL, or Hotmail in the box below.Don't have a social network account? Register and Login direct with VT and post.
Before you post, read our Comment Policy - Feedback
FACEBOOK
TWITTER
























Good questions. I read a great deal of declassified documents, some are 30 years old. It’s easy to speculate, but the flavor I get given all you have cited for reasons are more global. America indeed has acted strangly when it seemed it didn’t need to. As usual, I believe it’s multi-faceted. I believe Gordon was right when he said there was a big play for oil futures. I believe however, it was Rothschild organized not Lukid, meaning, under normal circumstances america would act in a militant fashion in the end of the sabre rattling, and not so diplomatically. They seemed to say, “Ok, that’s over, now let’s convince the world we’re actually sane folks again”.
I also believe Russia and China are tired and have made serious overtones that they are not kidding anymore. If China spent one month selling just 20% of their holdings in US currency and T-bonds, we’re looking at 40% inflation after the knee jerk reaction. Short of war, the US has to ride that out with their pants down. And we would have to with no recourse.
We can’t invade Iran, we can’t hurt Iran the way they want you to think they can. If we struck Iran, you would see real estate in Israel reduced to rubble. Lebanon, Hezbollah, and a few others have more weaponry and means than they want you to know about. There are biological weapons in the US, they’re in Iranian hands. Those weapons would also target Israel and any other agressor against Iran. Poor mans nukes….remember that one. Iran cannot be invaded, irradiated yes, but not controlled with boots on the ground where it counts. Because of that, China and Russia govern the realities of war in that region. Moreover, because we actually still have sane people that know a limited nuclear exchange is impossible between Russia and China, war is impossible- we’re all gone. We have had insane generals running the show since Rumsfeld fired all the moral one’s, but they’re even lucid when it comes to nuclear weapons…