FACEBOOK
TWITTER
Against Hollywoodism, Revisionism
President Ahmadinedschad and Robert Faurisson
Against Hollywoodism, Revisionism
Robert FAURISSON Tehran
(3 February 2012) – The term Hollywoodism refers to the transformation, often mendacious, of reality by the spirit and practices of a whole sphere of American cinema. At first, I shall discuss the evil in general done by Hollywoodism. Secondly, I shall describe the wrongs of Hollywoodism in the shaping of the imposture of “the Holocaust”, that is in building the myth of genocide, gas chambers and six million Jews killed by the Germans during the Second World War. Finally, in a third and last part I shall speak of Revisionism as the antidote par excellence to Hollywoodism and its incessant, aggressive publicity for the religion of “the Holocaust”.
1. Hollywoodism and the evil that it does
According to the American Heritage Dictionary, “Hollywood” may signify “the US film industry” but also “a flashy, vulgar atmosphere or tone, held to be associated with the US film industry”. Used as an adjective the word stands for “the US film industry”, as in “a Hollywood movie, a Hollywood producer,” or means “flashy and vulgar”, as in the dictionary’s illustrative sentence “Flashy and vulgar, their clothes were pure Hollywood.”
A well-known facet of the ideology propagated by this film industry is the basic division of the world between the Good and the Bad. The Good are the United States and the Bad are those whom the United States decrees as such. The Good are fundamentally Good and the Bad are fundamentally Bad. The United States is always in the right and always wins, whilst the “Bad Guys” are always in the wrong and always lose. Thus there cannot, there must not be any pity for the vanquished: their defeat proves that they were indeed criminals. The winners will independently assume the right to try the vanquished in court or to have them put on trial by others.
Everyone can bring to mind what are known as “the Nazi atrocities”, especially the images of walking corpses or corpses proper. For the past 67 years Hollywood has presented them as evidence that the Germans had death factories wherein the SS spent their time killing, especially Jews. In reality, those corpses were proof that because of the systematic destruction of German cities by the Allies, Germany in 1945 was in its death throes: the inhabitants who had survived the deluge of steel and fire were living in rubble or in holes in the ground, exposed to cold and hunger; often there was hardly any food or medicine; the hospitals and schools were destroyed; practically no trains and convoys were running any longer; the refugees from the East terrified by the invading Red Army’s murder and rape numbered in the millions. In 1948 the Italian director Roberto Rossellini faithfully described this situation in Germania, Anno Zero. Therefore one must not be surprised at the fact that in 1945, in the labour camps or concentration camps, famine and disease (typhus, typhoid fever, dysentery) reigned, whilst medicines and disinfectants such as Zyklon B were sorely lacking.
Hollywood, along with British cinema and Soviet propaganda, had a terrible and direct responsibility both in the lies attending what was called the discovery of the German concentration camps (1945) and in the ignoble “lynching party” (the phrase is that of Harlan Fiske Stone, Chief Justice of the US Supreme Court at the time) that was the Nuremberg trial (1945-1946), where the winners of the war, in coalition, made themselves judges and jury to try the defeated. It is altogether true that in 1945 even a privileged concentration camp like that of Bergen-Belsen offered a nightmarish vision. But the horrors discovered there were not created by the Germans. They were due to the war and, in particular, an air war conducted mercilessly, to the end, by the Allies against… civilians.
It took a fine cynicism to show those horrors and point an accusing finger at the defeated when the ones mainly responsible were the US Air Force and the Royal Air Force. In April 1945, no longer able to manage, the commandant of Bergen-Belsen, SS captain Josef Kramer, sent some men to meet the advancing troops of British Marshal Montgomery and warn them that they were approaching a terrible den of infection, and that they should not immediately release the prisoners lest they contaminate the civilian population and the British soldiers. The British agreed to work with the Wehrmacht. Once on the site, they kept the detainees there and tried to treat them but mortality remained appalling high for a long time. The British wanted to know how many inmates were buried in the mass graves. They extracted the corpses and counted them; then, using a bulldozer, a British officer pushed the bodies towards six large ditches where the soldiers forced female SS guards to cast them in with their bare hands. But this reality was very soon transformed by the film propaganda services, which had people believe that the bodies were those of people killed in an alleged extermination programme.
A photograph taken from a plane and showing the bulldozer from afar made it possible to convey the impression that the vehicle was driven by a German soldier performing his daily work as an employee of a death factory. In one case, a photo taken from up close showed the bottom of the machine pushing corpses but “beheaded” the driver so that, with him not appearing as a Briton, it was reckoned he was a German. The Americans went on to make more and more falsifications of this kind. The American general Eisenhower, supreme Allied commander, was the impresario of this intensified Hollywoodism. The famous Hollywood film director George C. Stevens was brought to Germany in the uniform of lieutenant-colonel. His team shot 80,000 feet of film from which 6,000 feet (or 7.5% of the total) were selected for General William Donovan, special assistant to the US chief of counsel at Nuremberg. It was those parts carefully selected by the American prosecution which, on November 29, 1945, practically at the lifting of the curtain of the loathsome “Nuremberg Trial”, were projected to a stupefied world; some of the German defendants, most disturbed at what they saw, deduced that Hitler had carried out a gigantic crime behind their backs. In this sense it can be said that the “Nuremberg Trial” marked the triumph of Hollywoodism.
2. Hollywoodism’s part in creating the myth of “the Holocaust”
“The Holocaust” of the Jews then became a sort of religion whose three main components are the extermination, the gas chambers and the six million martyrs. According to an article of faith of this religion Hitler ordered and planned the methodical slaughter of all European Jews; in so doing he committed a crime without precedent, a specific crime, later called genocide. Then, in order to commit this specific crime, he had a specific weapon developed, a weapon of mass destruction, the gas chamber, operating especially with a powerful insecticide, Zyklon B, whose active ingredient was hydrogen cyanide. Finally, the result of this enormous crime was the death of six million European Jews. The Auschwitz-Birkenau camp was the focal point, the apogee, the Golgotha of that horror. After the war a whole propaganda developed around this holy trinity of “the Holocaust”, a whole industry of “the Holocaust”, a whole business: the “Shoah Business”. In the United States the film industry has fed on this belief and spread it throughout the Western world. It is especially since 1978 that such propaganda has been developed, particularly with the four episodes of the U.S. miniseries Holocaust recounting the saga of the Weiss family. It is no exaggeration to say that the showing of that series became, as of 1979, practically mandatory in an entire portion of the world. It triggered a torrent of films including, by Steven Spielberg, Schindler’s List, by Roberto Benigni, Life is Beautiful, by Roman Polanski, The Pianist. In France, in 1985, Claude Lanzmann honoured us with a documendaciary running for over nine hours: Shoah. The number of Emmy Awards, Oscars and other prizes given to films like these is staggering. A mogul of the Entertainment Industry, Andrew Wallenstein, once stated in The Hollywood Reporter: “Let’s just say it: the real reason we see so many of these movies is that they’re awards bait.” It is such observations that have given rise to the saying “There’s No Business Like Shoah Business,” inspired by the refrain of the song, sung by Liza Minnelli amongst others, “There’s No Business Like Show Business.”
3. Revisionism is an antidote to the poison of Hollywoodism
Revisionism is not an ideology but a remedy for the temptation of ideology. It is a method. Whether in matters of literature, science, history, the media or any human activity whatsoever, it prescribes that the reality of a fact be established prior to any considerations on that fact. One must again see, hear, read what is believed to have been seen, heard or read. One must be wary of first impressions, of emotions, rumours, and must not rely on anything or anyone until one’s own thorough investigation has been conducted, all the more if one is studying a war rumour for – let us not forget –, in wartime the first casualty is the truth.
In the little time I have left here I cannot, unfortunately, describe how and at what price in fifty years of research I, along with a good number of other revisionists, have come to the conclusion that “the Holocaust” is decidedly but a gigantic imposture, as I was able to convince myself after a few years. Already on December 17, 1980 I had summarised this conclusion in a sentence of sixty French words of which I do not see a single one that needs removing today. Here is the English translation: “The alleged Hitlerite gas chambers and the alleged genocide of the Jews form one and the same historical lie, which has permitted a gigantic political and financial swindle whose main beneficiaries are the State of Israel and international Zionism and whose main victims are the German people – but not their leaders – and the Palestinian people in their entirety.”
To get an idea of the spectacular victories won against that imposture thanks to the revisionists’ work, one may refer to two studies appearing in my blog: “The Victories of Revisionism” (conference paper for Tehran, December 11, 2006) and “The Victories of Revisionism (continued)” (September 11, 2011). It is no exaggeration to say that currently, in France and elsewhere, the authors who used to defend the “Holocaust” thesis are in complete disarray. The trouble is that censorship and repression still prevent the general public from becoming aware of this good news, but with the Internet, times are changing, and quickly.
Conclusion
The general belief on the part of the Western world in “the Holocaust” has long been the sword and shield of Zionism. But today Revisionism is putting this belief in peril. This conference on Hollywoodism will mark, I think, one more step in our common struggle, a struggle for the rights of all – especially the Palestinians –, a struggle for the whole world to free itself from a tyranny based on the Greatest Lie of modern times.
Short URL: http://www.veteranstoday.com/?p=186890
Posted by Veterans Today on Feb 16 2012, With 0 Reads, Filed under Editors Picks, World. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
COMMENTS
To post, we ask that you login using Facebook, Yahoo, AOL, or Hotmail in the box below.Don't have a social network account? Register and Login direct with VT and post.
Before you post, read our Comment Policy - Feedback
“The alleged Hitlerite gas chambers and the alleged genocide of the Jews form one and the same historical lie, which has permitted a gigantic political and financial swindle whose main beneficiaries are the State of Israel and international Zionism and whose main victims are the German people – but not their leaders – and the Palestinian people in their entirety.”
What a great analysis.
very interesting, and thanks. I’m new to the holocaust revisionism and still learning. Thanks for taking a stand on an important issue!
Excellent article (just like the other works of Dr. Faurisson that I’ve had the pleasure to read).
Thanks to the internet, and thanks to courageous revisionists like Dr. Faurisson…who refuse to be silenced…many people are waking up. Whether enough people will wake up before organized Jewry ends life as we know it on this planet, unfortunately remains to be seen.
Brilliant article by a brilliant man.
Merci, professeur Faurisson!
Sincèrement.
Youssef
Liza Minelli? Ethel Merman would turn over in her grave. But I digress.
Agree totally – as I came to realize some time ago, the camps on the losing side, especially a side that loses and suffers egregious and unnecessary civilian terror, don’t get fed and the result is exactly what we saw on those films. A wise man (Willis Carto) once sat across the table from me and explained how The Holocaust was the Rosetta Stone to unlocking the entire farce that is the Zionist National Security State we’ve been saddled with for some decades now.
I would also like to point out the paradox that the pro-Holocaust people find themselves entangled in. While their media have worked day and night for those same decades to convince (not very well though) everyone that “there are no conspiracies” or that conspiracies are for the weak-minded etc. etc., the Holocaust itself is based entirely on a gigantic conspiracy by Hitler and his staff to exterminate an entire ethnicity of people from all of Europe, and later presumably, the entire world. I like to point out to people (at the risk of offending the religious) that for Zionist Christians (evil though they be) the Holocaust ranks as the 2nd greatest conspiracy in mankind’s history, right behind the rebellion of 1/3 of Heaven’s angels against God some thousands of years ago. Why these two? Why, because they are the major conspiracies that tried to destroy God’s People, as Zionist Christians see it. I should know – I grew up in the hotbed of this stuff, now HQ’d somewhere near Colorado Springs.
WHERE IS Dr. Ingrid R. Zundel Post ?, I was thinking up a pertinent comment/ “mini-addendum” ,something
appropriate.
I could be wrong but it has been several weeks since Dr. Ingrid R. Zundel presented us with one of
her excellent compositions
Has her latest Post been “computer hacked” and deleted?
This post is good too and I want to add to it (comment) after I give it some thought.
THANKS, always a great place,VT covers so many issues & dilemmas that the majority of the
readers & vt staff would agree we would certainly rather not exist or be real, but exist they do.
How many Americans age 40 plus came to a general conclusion from 1980-1989 that
“were f**ked” , this nation is screwed, the bs was already getting thick in that decade.
I could be wrong but it has been several weeks since Dr. Ingrid R. Zundel presented us with one of
her excellent compositions
Has her latest Post been “computer hacked” and deleted?
;
Thanks for the accolades. We are in the middle of very important litigation, and I have been asked to refrain from being politically incorrect for a while. Believe me it isn’t easy.
http://www.rense.com/Datapages/zunddata.htm
All but one of the major Holloywwod studios are run by Jewish people. I don’t know if they realize the Holocaust is a lie. Not one autopsy is available that shows a person died in the intern camps from being gassed, not one German document shows they had a plan to exterminate the Jews. Robert Faurisson is one of a few scholarly revisionists who showed me via their articles the Holocaust is a lie. Mark Weber of the Institute for Historical Review is another one of them.
Read this: http://radioislam.org/faurisson/eng/victories.htm
Warning: There is a photograph of Faurisson with a bloody mouth given to him by Jewish terrorists.
Do a Google search: victories of revisionism faurisson and click on the article at Radio Islam. Warning: There is a photograph of Faurisson with a bloody mouth given to him by Jewish terrorists.
Winston Churchill’s Secret Poison Gas Memo
——————————————————————————–
[stamp] PRIME MINISTER’S PERSONAL MINUTE
[stamp, pen] Serial No. D. 217/4
[Seal of Prime Minister]
10 Downing Street, Whitehall [gothic script]
GENERAL ISMAY FOR C.O.S. COMMITTEE [underlined]
1. I want you to think very seriously over this question of poison gas. I would not use it unless it could be shown either that (a) it was life or death for us, or (b) that it would shorten the war by a year.
2. It is absurd to consider morality on this topic when everybody used it in the last war without a word of complaint from the moralists or the Church. On the other hand, in the last war bombing of open cities was regarded as forbidden. Now everybody does it as a matter of course. It is simply a question of fashion changing as she does between long and short skirts for women.
3. I want a cold-blooded calculation made as to how it would pay us to use poison gas, by which I mean principally mustard. We will want to gain more ground in Normandy so as not to be cooped up in a small area. We could probably deliver 20 tons to their 1 and for the sake of the 1 they would bring their bomber aircraft into the area against our superiority, thus paying a heavy toll.
4. Why have the Germans not used it? Not certainly out of moral scruples or affection for us. They have not used it because it does not pay them. The greatest temptation ever offered to them was the beaches of Normandy. This they could have drenched with gas greatly to the hindrance of the troops. That they thought about it is certain and that they prepared against our use of gas is also certain. But they only reason they have not used it against us is that they fear the retaliation. What is to their detriment is to our advantage.
5. Although one sees how unpleasant it is to receive poison gas attacks, from which nearly everyone recovers, it is useless to protest that an equal amount of H. E. will not inflict greater casualties and sufferings on troops and civilians. One really must not be bound within silly conventions of the mind whether they be those that ruled in the last war or those in reverse which rule in this.
6. If the bombardment of London became a serious nuisance and great rockets with far-reaching and devastating effect fell on many centres of Government and labour, I should be prepared to do [underline] anything [stop underline] that would hit the enemy in a murderous place. I may certainly have to ask you to support me in using poison gas. We could drench the cities of the Ruhr and many other cities in Germany in such a way that most of the population would be requiring constant medical attention. We could stop all work at the flying bomb starting points. I do not see why we should have the disadvantages of being the gentleman while they have all the advantages of being the cad. There are times when this may be so but not now.
7. I quite agree that it may be several weeks or even months before I shall ask you to drench Germany with poison gas, and if we do it, let us do it one hundred per cent. In the meanwhile, I want the matter studied in cold blood by sensible people and not by that particular set of psalm-singing uniformed defeatists which one runs across now here now there. Pray address yourself to this. It is a big thing and can only be discarded for a big reason. I shall of course have to square Uncle Joe and the President; but you need not bring this into your calculations at the present time. Just try to find out what it is like on its merits.
[signed] Winston Churchill [initials]
6.7.44 [underlined]
Source: photographic copy of original 4 page memo, in Guenther W. Gellermann, “Der Krieg, der nicht stattfand”, Bernard & Graefe Verlag, 1986, pp. 249-251
Found at Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust
I lived and worked in Hollywood and I gotta say, as F%$^D up and degenerate as you think it is, it’s not. It’s much worse.
An entire “town” and an entire industry, the third biggest in the country (next to WMD manufacturing and the military) is devoted to servicing The Big Lie and is run by The Big Liars.
Great piece, thank you. We’re racing against time to see if we can save our planet and ourselves from the most vile and degenerate crime syndicate and demonic cult the world has ever seen. May God help us. You’ve certainly done your part!
My father was an infanterist in Russia until 1943, where he was severely wounded 40km west of Moscow.
When I was about 16, I asked him one evening: “For whom did you fight?”
He got so angry, he suddenly stood up and shoutet at me, said that I knew nothing about war (which was true) and I was not allowed to ask him such a question.
I was too fearful at that time to ask any more questions. When I served in the army and stayed at home for a weekend, he asked me to sit down, he gave me a bear and began to talk about the war for the first time. At the end he said: “The Communists and the Jews won the war, that’s all”. My father was Social Democrat.
Afterwards my mother told me, that he never had said that to her.
I learned the word Holocaust in the seventeeth by a Hollywood (magical stick) movie from Steven Spielberg. This movie helped to make us pay Billions/year to Israel until 2094. Germany payed the last rate of 50 Millions from the Versailles treaty somewhat a year ago.
Now, I’m learning more and more every day.
Thanks for this honest anf fearless speech, Mr. Faurisson. Of course, this speech would bring him into jail in Germany. You also know this legislation, it’s called “Hate Speech”.
My question here only is: “Who hates whom?”
Detlef is 2094 a typo? Just curious.
No rico, no typo, this is a fact.
Sorry for this mistake: My father gave me beer.
My father gave me beer, too. I think it may have saved me. He’s a lot smarter than I look…..!
The movie industry (outside of Hollywood) has started to produce television series, films and documentaries that challange the skewing of truth that supported the creation of Israel.
A wonderful example (and enjoyable viewing as well) is the British production “The Promise”, which survived Jewish outrage to have it banned, and has resulted in many sympathetic to Israel totally changing theirs views to support the Palestianian cause instead.
This one courageous programme has done immense harm to the illegal Zionist dream. Its power comes from giving ordinary people a reference for vocalising they views about the wrongs of Israel and to be able to stand up against those who support Zionism and their well orchestrated critics of criticism. This movie will be followed by many more as the creative producers delve into the enormous pit of material available to them. As more and more revelations of the wrongs of Israel becomes accepted viewing material, and the critics of criticism become drowned out, then the really contentious topics such as the holocaust can be tackled without fear.
I for one, am looking forward to the new movies, based on fact (that will seem stranger that fiction), based on Israels wrongdoing, and attempts to cover them up, that will emerge. They will materialise at an increasing rate as the appetite for truth grows.
The reaction against the creation of Israels baby, i.e., Hollywood, may well be its own undoing.
http://www.channel4.com/programmes/the-promise/4od
This excellent satire, by a colleague of Dr. Faurisson’s compliments his article.
http://www.jrbooksonline.com/cwporter/gasnot.htm