FACEBOOK
TWITTER
9/11 Laugh Riot?
The power of inappropriate laughter
by Kevin Barrett
I visited Washington DC last Wednesday and Thursday.
Enver Masud, a retired international consulting engineer and author of 9/11 Unveiled, met me at Reagan National. He lives very close to the the airport – and just a few blocks away from the Pentagon.
On 9/11, shortly after the Pentagon was attacked, Enver hurried to the top of a nearby hill overlooking the side of the Pentagon that was allegedly hit by a plane…and saw no evidence of any plane crash.
From the airport, Enver drove me to that hilltop site. It offers an excellent view of the approach path allegedly taken by Flight 77.
From that hilltop, you can see the top 3 1/2 floors of the whole west side of the Pentagon. The bombing or crash or missile or whatever it was did absolutely no visible damage…at least not until the fire caused the top floors to collapse well after the initial attack.
Whatever happened at the Pentagon blasted a very small hole that affected only the two bottom floors. It left unbroken glass in the windows surrounding the hole. There were no damage marks where the engines would have struck. The giant tail, which would have hit the upper floors of the building, left no mark and broke no glass.
 |
| A 757 disappeared into this hole. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA!!!! |
A Boeing 757 weighs 250 tons. The government claims that 250 tons of metal and plastic slammed into the Pentagon, yet there is no record of its discovery or removal…just as there is no record of the discovery or removal of 250 tons of aircraft material from the fifteen foot hole in the ground in Shanksville – where the government claims, without offering a shred of evidence, that another 757 buried itself and was later excavated.
After viewing the alleged approach path at the Pentagon, I’m amazed that anyone ever accepted the official version. Why would suicide hijackers make such a difficult downhill approach over obstacle-strewn terrain?! And at over 500 mph – a speed that 757s probably can’t even achieve at that altitude, and certainly can’t achieve and still be controllable. And for what – to hit the relatively empty, newly-renovated West Wing of the building?! Any real kamikaze would obviously just dive into the huge, sprawling top of the building, aiming generally for the East Wing where all the top brass is stationed.
And the idea that Hani Hanjour, who couldn’t be trusted to solo in a Cessna, could pull off such a magnificently impossible bit of stunt flying, much less want to…it really boggles the mind. After viewing the site, it’s obvious to me that the story of how Flight 77 hit the Pentagon is even more ridiculous than NIST’s claim that Building 7 came down from ordinary office fires.
After touring the Pentagon attack scene with Enver Masud, I met with David Slesinger of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth. David said that some of the architects and engineers had questions about my seemingly flamboyant, outrageous style of 9/11 activism. These people tend to be timid personalities, fearful of ridicule. They are afraid that bold actions by people like me – such as saying exactly what I think happened, naming the perpetrators, ridiculing the official story, pointing out that the rule of law is (at least temporarily) defunct and calling for an uprising, demanding justice at any price, using humor and hyperbole – will eclipse their more cautious and “scientific” approach, and impede the progress of the truth movement.
I told David that every 9/11 activist needs to read Lakoff’s classic Don’t Think of an Elephant. As Lakoff explains, every time you mention an issue that has been framed by the other side, it reinforces the other side’s frame, and works against your objectives.
Every time you mention 9/11, it tends to conjure up and reinforce the genocidal official story in the minds of non-truthers. Bringing the subject up actually fuels the genocide! This is especially true if you simply question 9/11 gently, or call for a new investigation. Your gentle questioning is no match for the tidal wave of psychic energy that the event unleashed, and the genocidal official myth that harnessed that energy.
The genocidal “19 hijackers” myth of 9/11 has been presented as a satisfactory, emotionally-charged narrative. The human mind thinks in narratives and associated emotional images. If it’s a complete, accepted narrative, it’s “real.” Questions and calls for new investigations will never undo it. The only way to fight a sacred narrative is (A) to profane that narrative – throw feces on it, smash its idols, heap ridicule and scorn and abuse on it, and so on; and (B) construct an equally engaging, equally emotionally-charged counter-narrative, complete with heroes, martyrs, and victims.
So while it’s fine for Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth to say “we don’t really know what happened, we just know that the official version is false,” that position is as politically impotent as it is scientifically immaculate.
We need AE911truth.org. But 9/11 activism must not be limited to echoing its position. 9/11 activists and communications specialists must insist that we DO know what happened on 9/11. We must insist that we DO know who did it, and why. We DO know the names of the the genocidal mass murderers: Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, Larry Silverstein, Dov Zakheim, Scooter Libby, Douglas Feith, Benjamin Netanyahu, and so on. And we DO know who the real victims were: the Constitution of the USA, the millions of Muslims murdered in the 9/11-triggered genocide, and the religion and culture of Islam which is still under genocidal attack throughout the world.
Alongside constructing this intense, emotionally-charged counter-narrative (which has the merit of happening to be true), we should also lose no opportunity to ridicule the official version of 9/11 as loudly and derisively as possible. Ridicule, more than any other weapon, can rob sacred myths of their power.
To that end, I propose that instead of a violent general uprising, we stage a nonstop 9/11 “laugh riot.” Every time anyone brings up the subject of 9/11 in a way that expressly or implicitly accepts the official story – especially if it’s the usual sanctimonious BS – we shall erupt in furious barks of outraged laughter.
Every official 9/11 commemorative event should be infiltrated and disrupted by laugh riots. When one laughing person is ejected, the next person starts laughing…then the next.
Every time a politician or anyone else mentions 9/11 in a speech, he or she should be drowned out by waves of general hilarity.
After all, it is pretty hilarious that anyone ever believed the official story for even a split-second. (I half-believed it for two years, and will never stop laughing at myself.)
Will the bastards who did it get the last laugh?
Not if we can out-laugh and outlast them.
Short URL: http://www.veteranstoday.com/?p=187263
Posted by Kevin Barrett on Feb 18 2012, With 0 Reads, Filed under 9/11, Editors Picks. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
COMMENTS
To post, we ask that you login using Facebook, Yahoo, AOL, or Hotmail in the box below.Don't have a social network account? Register and Login direct with VT and post.
Before you post, read our Comment Policy - Feedback
Your mailbox just got sprayed with an invisible ink that comes out as “red” when looked at with special lenses. Welcome to the club.
From an article:
Google “Jamie McIntyre” and “9/11” and this firsthand account from 2001 will pop up, in which I utter the fateful words, “I can tell you from my close-up inspection, there’s no evidence of a plane crashing anywhere NEAR the Pentagon.”
That phrasing – taken out on context – has fueled internet conspiracies for years, and a fresh crop has popped up ahead of the 9th anniversary of the terrorist attacks.
What the 9/11 deniers intentionally misrepresent, is that I was answering a question about an earlier report that the plane crashed SHORT of the Pentagon, nearby. I was explaining there was no sign of a crash anywhere BUT at the Pentagon.
Whenever I confront one of these conspiracy promoters, the result is the same: they simply conclude I must be lying, or that the government has “gotten to me” to change my story.
But I was there. I saw the thousands of pieces of the plane scattered over the heliport outside the Pentagon. I photographed pieces of the wreckage, photos you can see here.
Brian: Do a Google search The Immortal 9/11 Conspiracy click on the article at the line of departure website and look at the photograph of the thousands of shards of the airplane with the firefighters in the background. That’s what happens when a plane hits a stout building and not dirt. I could offer a lot of evidence that a plane hit the Pentagon, but look at the photograph.
I’m trying this again.
From an article:
Google “Jamie McIntyre” and “9/11” and this firsthand account from 2001 will pop up, in which I utter the fateful words, “I can tell you from my close-up inspection, there’s no evidence of a plane crashing anywhere NEAR the Pentagon.”
That phrasing – taken out on context – has fueled internet conspiracies for years, and a fresh crop has popped up ahead of the 9th anniversary of the terrorist attacks.
What the 9/11 deniers intentionally misrepresent, is that I was answering a question about an earlier report that the plane crashed SHORT of the Pentagon, nearby. I was explaining there was no sign of a crash anywhere BUT at the Pentagon.
Whenever I confront one of these conspiracy promoters, the result is the same: they simply conclude I must be lying, or that the government has “gotten to me” to change my story.
But I was there. I saw the thousands of pieces of the plane scattered over the heliport outside the Pentagon. I photographed pieces of the wreckage, photos you can see here.
Brian: Do a Google search The Immortal 9/11 Conspiracy click on the article at the line of departure website and look at the photograph of the thousands of shards of the airplane with the firefighters in the background. That’s what happens when a plane hits a stout building and not dirt. I could offer a lot of evidence that a plane hit the Pentagon, but look at the photograph.
I’m perfectly willing to believe that a big jet hit the Pentagon, because of witness testimony, and because of the thousands of pieces of jet etc. I am willing. But there are these nagging suspicions that just won’t go away, like Fascism and Zionism and Neocons won’t go away. Know what I mean? You know their desperate drive for more power and secrecy, their destruction of Constitutional Rights, yadda yadda. And yet, in your heart of hearts you want to believe that they’re human, even good Americans. You want to believe, and you look at the pitifully small evidence we have and your desperation for scientific validity, not to mention sanity, has you clinging to those fragments of evidence against the mountain of counter evidence hanging over all of our heads day and night, in an effort to stay afloat on a sea of unreality. You don’t want to jump off of your life raft of reason and risk drowning in the ocean of conspiracy theory and paranoia. Yet, truth is an ugly thing some times, and the demons who pulled off this monstrously foul deed that has thrown the entire world into an inevitable path to nuclear war are not going to let up until we are all dead. John Kennedy realized that these people had a collective death wish for the world, and he paid the price for his newly acquired perspective. I’d say, don’t spend too much time on those plane fragments – start at the other end of what 9/11 has brought us and work backward from there. It’s more enlightening that way and does more good too.
Then be willing to perfect to show ANY evidence that ANY plane ever hit the pentagon. Witnesses? Really? Show me. As for the author of this piece,,,,,,
quote
(So while it’s fine for Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth to say “we don’t really know what happened, we just know that the official version is false,” that position is as politically impotent as it is scientifically immaculate.) unquote
A&E 9/11 Truth either know exactly what happened ( micro nukes) and are being gate keepers or they have no clue what happened and you shouldn’t be wasting your time with them. Either way, they are fraud upon reality. Wake Up! 9/11 = Mossad/Cia/Micro nukes/molecular dissociaton/pyrolastic debris flows and massive radiation. I have offered to debate O’Rielly and Beck and others numerous times anywhere, any time of their choosing, and never got a reply back. Wanna know why????????????
We need AE911truth.org. But 9/11 activism must not be limited to echoing its position.
Pre-planted witnesses? More witnesses sd they saw what looked like a “small commuter jet” ( which is what you would a Cruise missile can pass for and what they would have sd if asked within the hour )…And there were no “thousands of pieces” of anything…There was some sheet metal fm a AA plane that crashed 4 yrs before…
If anything was planted, it may have been a plausible memory based on what actual witnesses (if any) were led by investigators to believe must have been what they saw, using leading questions such as, “How would you describe the aircraft you and so many others saw? Was it like this one, or more like that one?”
Elizabeth Loftus’s experiment comes to mind, where she showed a fake ad to people who’d been to Disney many years before, showing Bugs Bunny at Disney World, and then asked them if they recalled meeting the character. Most agreed, and I believe about a third persisted in claiming they saw and talked with Bugs even after being told he’s not a Disney character and had never appeared there.
Wellman’s classic Art of Cross-Examination, written nearly a century ago, shows how abysmally unreliable eyewitness testimony is of fast moving events, and particularly of implausible events, after which the witness more often than not instinctively creates a rational picture based on probability, plausibility, and suggestion.
The fact that scientists, engineers, techies, students and everyone else spend so much time arguing the “hows” of 9/11 distracts from the FAR more important question of “whos.’” We know WHO did it and we know WHY. We already have enough evidence for a conviction, as well.
Next time someone tries to discredit us for not having ALL the answers, I say we simply say, “What’s the difference?”
Exactly, DaveE. Those are the tactics of the ‘other’
They endlessly debate about meaningless stuff like how the towers were brought down, the Pentagon, and Shanksville. Or come up with new theories or new information that isn’t new or interesting or helping anything at all. Then go the Fetzer route of saying we need all the answers or whatever. Who cares? The official story is nonsense. People saying “inside job” are only half right and people saying “Bush did it” are clueless.
Elements within the department of defense and the CIA were at varying levels of awareness of what was going on. Neocon and Zionists working for a shadowy anti-USA cabal who had spent decades infiltrating our government. Besides the infamous Israeli vans reported with and without explosives, you have an art project with Israeli participants in one tower at impact level, stories of Israeli contractors in the other tower, the Silverstein/Netanyahu/Sharon love triangle and Rupert Murdoch’s media collaboration, New Yorkers reported speaking in Hebrew at a Jewish cemetery about the the towers going to be missing (which was verified to have been reported to the FBI).
Then you got all the neocons using this event to carry out their war mongering they had been championing since the 80s and especially in the 90s. Not long before 9/11, Israel and the Palestinians were reportedly the closest they had ever been to a peace agreement. Then the second Intifada happened. Israel-US relations were pretty rosy and Israel had US sympathy from the suicide bombings of the 90s. You had Satan-in-the-flesh Sharon as PM. And now was the time, this had been plotted for years. Right before 9/11, you had the military (and others) talking about a hypothetical military involvement to help solve the problem. But how hypothetical was it? This is where Mossad was infamously called a ‘wild card, capable of making an attack look like an enemy’s’
The timing was right, the outcome was partially as expected (the war, the draconian laws, the Israeli-style security, demonizing Islam) but I’m pretty sure that part of the expectation was blame it on the Palestinians.
I have no idea what happened and can only speculate, but my theory is that the US and Israel talked it out. The US agreed on certain things like promoting prominent neocons, promising war in the ME, the Patriot Act, the DHS, etc. But Israel couldn’t blame Palestinians because that was just too unbelievable and dangerous. Blame Osama instead (since they had been propping him up at that point anyways).
Now, Ariel Sharon is a notorious Jewish Nationalist, Revisionist Zionist, and war criminal pig who destroyed an entire Palestinian refugee camp in Lebanon. He also was the PM for Israel when Mossad was carrying out the 9/11 terrorist attacks on the US. I’ve read some of the stuff attributed to him. It’s quite frightening. He also infamously said that his people the Jews control the US.
The most ironic thing happened under Sharon that never happened under any Labor party or other candidate: Israel disengaged their occupation of a complete Palestinian territory. Military presence was kept on the border but all internal presence was disbanded and all settlements were evacuated and destroyed. There was also some settlements (but not enough) in the WB that were evacuated as well.
Obviously Israel has used this as an excuse and have made Gaza into an open air prison all all that ever since. But it is truly baffling that this happened under Sharon of all people. That he had to create a new party. Either the man obtained a soul late in life (doubtful) or more likely, this was Israel’s ‘payment’ for doing 9/11. That the US ordered them to to make ‘painful concessions’ for carrying out the attack and this was it.
Well, some are willing to settle for part of the truth, others like myself want to understand it all. There is no inconsistency unless we are talking about one and the same person. Personally, I want the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. But I don’t mind if others do not share that goal or objective.
Kevin,
this picture is one of the most obvious evidence for the official Pentagon hoax. Whatever hit the building, it was no 747!
Too many people are misled by daily weather reports, they simply “trust” them. They go out of the door, see that the sun is shining, although the report said, it would be raining. And then perhaps they think: this must be a very complex weather situation, rather unpredictable. Later they’ve forgotten all of this. Next day, it’s all the same and so it goes.
People, who are not influenced by this permanent “We know it all and we’ll tell you, don’t believe your own senses and experiences” cannot be fooled that much. Part of this game is the great community of “Scientific Experts”. If we simply believe their judgement in court cases, in terror attacs, in accidents or whatever, we are doomed.
Many of the scientists in the “Truth” movement make honest work, but we should never simple trust them and don’t look and think for ourselves. The shaping of opinions is very simple, if we ever should give the whole judgement authority to them.
This picture speeks for itself, no scientific specialist needed: it was no 747!
This picture is one of the most obvious evidence for the official Pentagon hoax. Whatever hit the building, it was no 747!
Too many people are misled by daily weather reports, they simply “trust” them. They go out of the door, see that the sun is shining, although the report said, it would be raining. And then perhaps they think: this must be a very complex weather situation, rather unpredictable. Later they’ve forgotten all of this. Next day, it’s all the same and so it goes.
People, who are not influenced by this permanent “We know it all and we’ll tell you, don’t believe your own senses and experiences” cannot be fooled that much. Part of this game is the great community of “Scientific Experts”. If we simply believe their judgement in court cases, in terror attacs, in accidents or whatever, we are doomed.
Many of the scientists in the “Truth” movement make honest work, but we should never simple trust them and don’t look and think for ourselves. The shaping of opinions is very simple, if we ever should give the whole judgement authority to them.
This picture speeks for itself, no scientific specialist needed: it was no 747!
Yeah. Watch the weather, local or national and pay attention for inclement weather. I live in an area that is sunny and cloudless for weeks at a time. When I see rain or clouds 3 days out, I make sure I see that weather in the morning, noon and dusk. What happenes down here is chemtrails, lost of them. Not one regular cloud in the morning, then 50 jets crisscross the sky, bang! Cloudy day. Real cloudy. Haven’t seen any 747′s either. Suppose I’m crazy, empirically of course…
There’s overwhelming evidence a plane hit the Pentagon including photographs and eyewitness testimony. Hundreds of people saw the plane flying to the Pentagon and nobody saw it fly away. Air traffic controllers saw the plane on their radar screens and in the sky, none of them saw it fly away.
I’ve been researching and writing about 911 since 2002, the Mossad smacked the Pentagon with a remote controlled plane. I suppose the no planers at the Pentagon crowd actually think the air traffic controllers and the large number of eyewitnesses were in on the scam.
People say the passenger plane couldn’t have made the maneuvers at the Pentagon therefore it was a missile, not one witness reported seeing a missile at the Pentagon, they only have a fake video. The air traffic controllers reported the complex maneuver by the plane, were they drunk? Incompetent? If they were in on the scam why would they report the plane made a maneuver it could not make?
Some people honestly believe a missile hit the Pentagon but the theory is being promoted by Mossad agents and sayanim in the 911 truth movement to put the blame on the U.S. government and not the Mossad. I have placed a huge amount of evidence in VT comment sections numerous times showing a plane hit the Pentagon and I’m not going to place it again. People should focus on who did it and I believe the Mossad did it.
From 911review.com:
A fact frequently cited as evidence that the aircraft that attacked the Pentagon on 9/11/01 was not Flight 77, a Boeing 757, is that the aircraft tracked by air traffic controllers made a spectacular spiral dive, losing 7000 feet and turning 270 degrees in about 2.5 minutes — a maneuver alleged to be impossible for a 757. A September 12, 2001 CBS News report described the maneuver:
Radar shows that Flight 77 did a downward spiral, turning almost a complete circle and dropping the last 7000 feet in two-and-a-half minutes.
Air traffic controller Danielle O’Brien told ABC News that the maneuver was not one expected of a jetliner:
The speed, the maneuverability, the way that he turned, we all thought in the radar room, all of us experienced air-traffic controllers, that that was a military plane.
Brian: They saw a plane. They didn’t suggest it was a missile. They said the maneuver was not one expected of a jetliner they didn’t say it was impossible. They never said the plane flew away from the Pentagon.
Some experts suggest the passenger plane was capable of making the maneuvers, but the Mossad could have used a military plane disguised as a passenger plane but that’s risky.
There is scientific information on the Internet showing the passenger plane could make the maneuvers if flown by the flight control computer located in the plane, it’s equipped with radar altimeters and accurate GPS monitors for precise altitude and position tracking. It can analyze and respond to conditions hundreds of times per second.. The eyewitness testimony is very compelling and so are the numerous photographs. Do some Google searches.
At this point, I’m just going to let people believe what they want. It’s amazing to me that from the outset, 9/11 troof has focused on the Pentagon when there is enough going on in NYC and WTC alone. The guy who started the missile thing turned out to be a well-poisoner. And Rumsfeld mentioned missile in that same week with a Freudian slip.
The best Pentagon story I ever read was that the plane swooped down and then pulled up, and an armored truck with wings on it full of C4 and aircraft parts came from US-27 passed the heliport and crashed at high speed into the Pentagon. Hey it sounds a hell of a lot more realistic than the missile thing.
The reason for the fixation on the Pentagon is the audit of the missing $2.3 trillion announced one day prior by Rumsfeld. And the section affected is where the audit team had been working. $2.3 trillion lost over the course of the previous ten years. And you know where it probably went? 9/11. It probably paid for the whole thing.
There was no wreckage consistent with that of a 767 at the Pentagon…Period…Don’t agree? Go argue with Gen Stubblebein, Chief of Army Intell..
Bill, you are killing me! Sift through her posts and tell me who you think you’re arguing with? Cmon…expect better from you.
Dick Cheney was in charge of NORAD when the events of 9/11 happened and NORAD has to ability to take over the flying of individual commercial planes and fly them. Building seven was taken down by explosives.
The plot was to take over the world’s oil supply especially the oil in the Middle East but the GFC happened earlier than expected. The GFC was not supposed to take place until after all of the required governments were overthrown. Then the Euro was supposed to fail and the US was supposed to control the worlds oil and worlds reserve currency.
It failed because everyone could see the plan.
Syria will stay under Russian protection.
NATO will not take on Iran in a war.
Asia will continue to buy oil from Iran.
The Euro will survive and Asian countries are now trading using the Yuan and other regional currencies.
Brian – makes sense.
Is anything really being done to investigate what happened sept 2001? Does anyone in our government especially intell agencies really look into who planned the whole thing? Brian- if Mossad in charge, then like Pearl Harbor, Gulf of Tonkin, we may never get truth or it may be 50 years from now.
How could we ever know truth if overwhelming majority of Americans are only exposed to the mainstream media. I say a plane hit Pentagon but then how would I ever know if anyone is tracking Mossad?
10 years passed since 9/11. I thought for sure that was the magic number. People always like those mile stones. If there was ever an opening to get more people involved and aware of the lies, this was the one. Leading up to it you could tell the cointelpro and the think thanks and hasbara were working overtime doing damage control. Even ADL was pulling all-nighters.. And on the Sabbath!
But it came and it went. Nobody changed their mind and nobody cared. Only the conspiracy theorists, the shills, and the media cared. Everybody else was watching dancing with the stars or something like that. They don’t care. They never will care.
The troofer movement is a joke. They need to be laughed at too. I noticed that they’re pushing the ‘no controlled demolition’ narrative now. Basically it goes something like this: “Many of us well-meaning truth seekers followed the controlled demolition story for years, but now we all know that those involved early on pushing this were liars. The fires and the jet fuel really did take the buildings down. We all know this now, but it is hard to sober up after years of believing liars. If there were explosives there would be no reason to hide this from the public”
Yes there are people actually spreading this. Watch out for words like “we all know” taking ownership for everybody. There were so many well-poisoners early on that they can do this. And I’m sure that was partially the intent. Most of the jet fuel leaked out and poured into the streets in liquid non-flaming form. At least with WTC2, the first one to collapse. There is plenty of circumstantial evidence that explosives were somehow involved. I don’t care what kind of explosives they were either, arguing about it is a straw man argument. I also don’t care about the Pentagon at all. F*ck the Pentagon. That’s a straw many argument piece too. 9/11 doesn’t need the Pentagon or Shanksville. WTC is bad enough. The most important thing about the Pentagon is the missing $2.3 trillion. All the arguing is hiding this fact. On purpose.
It doesn’t matter if you believe that HAARP or nukes or laser beams destroyed the WTC either. When you solve a murder case, you do need to know how they were killed but the most important thing is to find the killer. Is anybody going to stop skirting around all of this nonsense and arguing and go after the people who did it? PROTIP: They speak Hebrew. And they have friends in all the major intelligence agencies which they infiltrated (among other places).
At this point, it’s hopeless. 9/11 doesn’t matter to me anymore. Because it doesn’t matter to most people. But it is a joke whenever a politician mentions it at this point. They should to be laughed at. 9/11 conspiracies are going to be like JFK ones from here on out.
Remember the Truman Show? How Jim Carey notices that an elevator is a set and they prevent him from seeing anything further? That’s how reality is when you think about it. 9/11 was literally like a Hollywood production and all those Israelis were the people behind the stage creating the set. The official story is canonical reality just like Truman’s canonical reality. It’s fictional, staged by a third party. To put on a show. It is official history the same as any other because history is never really what happened. Reality is stranger than canonical history. After the Osamagate thing this year, I am not even sure that I am on my correct planet. So many people believed that story. It’s unreal. It’s hopeless, people deserve their fates. They deserve to suffer under a controller agenda.
If we really want to expose the lies, we have to change perceptions. Pick an easier target. The bankster establishment for example. The bankster system is easy to explain, criminal, and wrong. So wrong that if it were focused on the truth could go viral. Target the banksters, bring out the guillotine. Off with their heads. Then we can expose every single one of their lies. And there are some bigger lies than 9/11. My favorite big lie is six million lies all wrapped up in one. Six million unaccounted for people whose corpses vanished into thin air. Or they were buried in massive non-existent graves. Or burned into ashes which should have left massive piles but didn’t. And a lot of them apparently met their fate in gas chamber, except there is not a single piece of physical evidence other than eye witness accounts (and they told a heck of a lot of lies at the same time) that gas chambers exist. There is that re-constructed morgue that’s supposed to be a gas chamber. Sure doesn’t look like a gas chamber to me.
Wanna expose the holohoax? Find out who killed JFK? The truth about 9/11? Go after the banksters and overthrow the entire Western establishment. Easier said than done, I know. But that’s the only way we’ll ever know.
To me, the 11 year anniversary will be the big one. 11 is a key Kabbalistic number. Did not GHBush declare a New World Order 11 years prior to 9/11? As far as a comparison to JFK, I would hesitate to discount the power of the Internet in a faltering economy. The people who planned/okayed 911 are oldtimers, and probably underestimated the amount of information released in the digital age. The people behind 911 are the ones treading water.
The 911 thugs squandered something-the trust of thinking Americans. I think the whole operation became a fiasco which illustrated how moronic the Feiths, Silverman’s, Bushes are. The Shanksville plane was supposed to hit WTC7, imo, and when it didn’t, they just pulled it, probably out of panic.
As far as going after “bankers”, it’s too easy for that to be couched as “anti-Jew”. One of the amusing things about the 911 coverup is the attempt to label people who don’t believe structural steel can be melted by kerosene as “anti-Jew”. God invented Physics. If God is “ANTI-Jew”, what does that tell you?