JOIN TEAM VT | SIGN UP DAILY NEWSLETTER
VETERANS TODAY ON : FACEBOOK | TWITTER | VT FORUM
|

Surprise Video Changes Syria “Timeline”

Al Jazeera’s Shaping of the Syrian Story

 

 by Sharmine Narwani

 

Of all the myths obstructing the honest portrayal of events in Syria this past year, none has been more fiercely guarded by regime-change advocates than this one stark falsehood:

Myth – the Syrian regime has only been shooting unarmed, peaceful protestors until very recently when opposition groups finally decided to arm themselves in self-defense.

On the contrary, there is clear evidence that armed groups have targeted and killed security forces and civilians from within weeks of the first small protests in March 2011. An earlier investigative piece I wrote on the Syrian casualty lists identifies the shooting deaths of nine Syrian soldiers in Banyas on April 10, 2011 as one important timeline marker for premeditated opposition violence.

Ignoring this vital piece of information about the security landscape has helped shape a fundamentally flawed narrative of events in Syria. Furthermore, this false storyline has directly contributed to the escalation of the crisis by inciting rage against the “one-sided” violence of the regime, and emboldening opponents with a misplaced “righteousness” that kills legitimate debate on Syria.

But this narrative has been unraveling in the past few months. Photos and video footage of armed men with heavy weapons proudly declaring their stripes – some of them religious extremists advocating the killing of civilians based on sectarian differences – have been recently making the rounds.

Jihadist web chatter about armed groups in Syria, suicide bombings in Damascus and Aleppo, and now Al Qaeda’s “call to battle” have forced western pundits – who know a red line when they see one – to grudgingly acknowledge there are two sides in Syria’s violent tug of war.

Quite suddenly, this has forced a shift in the discourse on Syria. Regime opponents have taken care, however, to ensure that the new narrative incorporates the existence of armed groups without challenging the core premise that “the regime massacres peaceful protestors.”

This effectively means that armed opposition can only be introduced into the Syrian crisis “timeline” at a date long after the outbreak of protests.

Consequently, it is only in early 2012 that references to armed militias have trickled into the media marketplace – and always in the context of a carefully scripted storyline which misleadingly claims – as in this February New York Times opinion piece: “the resistance” has only “now begun to arm itself and to exercise self-defense.”

Hashem of Al Jazeera resigned over channels' bias coverage

Al Jazeera’s Shaping of the Syrian Story

Ali Hashem’s resignation from Al Jazeera last month may not have raised an eyebrow in normal circumstances.

But the Beirut-based correspondent was one of a number of Al Jazeera employees whose hacked-and-leaked emails displayed a growing dissatisfaction with their satellite network’s biased coverage of Syria.

His exit from the troubled media company is eclipsed, however, by the bombshell he is about to drop.

Hashem claims Al Jazeera refused to air footage of dozens of armed gunmen engaging with targets inside Syrian territory in May 2011. He and his crew, Hashem reports, also witnessed armed groups entering Syria three weeks earlier, in April 2011, but were only able to capture them on film in May. Some of the weapons they sighted included Kalashnikovs and Rocket Propelled Grenades (RPGs).

But now Hashem reveals that he has in hand the actual censored video footage of opposition gunmen engaged in clashes in Syria last May and that it will be broadcast later this week.

During a brief preview of the footage on his iPad in a Beirut cafe, the veteran journalist explains: “I have both the footage which Al Jazeera refused to air and footage of the segment that was broadcast. On air, I am telling viewers that I am witnessing armed men clashing with the Syrian army, though what you read on Al Jazeera’s screen says something entirely different. This is in the Talkalakh area on the Syrian-Lebanese border, on the Syrian side. You can see the militants shooting in the video. And when you do a comparison of the two videos, you can see they are in the same place.”

Below is a still shot from Hashem’s exclusive footage showing gunmen operating inside Syria in May 2011:

“Ensa enno fee masallaheen”

The value of the newsworthy footage was not lost on Hashem and his crew, so he was surprised when Al Jazeera’s then-acting head of news told him via phone “ensa enno fee masallaheen” or “forget there are armed men.”

Hashem refused, and a heated defense of professional reporting ethics ensued until he was assured that he could speak freely on the air. He did – but Al Jazeera did not broadcast the accompanying footage of gunmen while Hashem was on air describing them. The network later insisted that it was a genuine “mistake.”

It will be interesting to see if Hashem’s footage actually changes the dominant view on Syria. There is little incentive for the mainstream media to self-correct a narrative that feeds into a lucrative formula: bad dictator, peaceful protestors, regime change, happy ending.

In fact, it is quite galling to see how complicit the various media outlets, human rights groups, governments and major NGOs continue to be actively supporting a false version of events.

The killing of the nine Syrian soldiers in Banyas last April, for instance, was whitewashed by Al Jazeera, The Guardian, BBC and other news outlets who quote “activists” saying the nine were executed by fellow soldiers for refusing to fire on civilians.

But YouTube searches for some of the dead soldiers – Lieutenant Colonel Yasar Qash’ur and Colonel Waeb Issa – shows actively pro-regime funerals, and not the kind of memorial services reserved for opposition sympathizers.

Human rights groups have been even more shameless in underplaying violence by armed opposition groups. Amnesty International’s Syria Researcher Neil Sammonds, on a recent BBC radio interview, famously invokes a “black eye” as one example of armed opposition abuses – as though he genuinely could not recall any significant reports of violence associated with these gunmen. It is a pity for him then that I have in hand the lengthy correspondence between Sammonds and a Syrian activist that details opposition killings, torture and violence – the activist imploring him over and over again to investigate these crimes and highlight their prevalence inside Syria.

Human rights groups ‘Trojan horses of the West’

An unexpected press release by Human Rights Watch on March 20 does exactly that. It is the first rights group to highlight opposition violence to this extent, but predictably does so within the old timeline narrative, placing armed groups into the Syrian storyline well after protests kicked off in March 2011. The HRW briefing specifies:

“The protest movement in Syria was overwhelmingly peaceful until September 2011. Since then, an increasing number of media and other reports have said that a growing number of military defectors and local residents have decided to resort to arms, saying they are defending themselves against security forces’ raids or attacking checkpoints and security facilities in their cities.”

I had a chat with HRW researcher Ole Solvang about the discrepancy in these conflicting timelines – and he openly admits: “The key is in the word ‘overwhelmingly.’ We don’t mean to say that there were no violence against government forces before this. What we mean is that anti-government violence became more organized and frequent after this.”

In fact Solvag concedes that there isn’t much that HRW can conclusively state about opposition violence in the early stages of the protest movement. “We have documented that there has been violence used against government forces before September….and against captured soldiers and civilians.” Solvag cautions that this “does not justify the government opening fire on protestors,” and then surprises me with the admission, “even if there were sometimes weapons in the crowds and some demonstrators opened fire against government forces.”

Here’s why I think Ali Hashem’s video footage needs an airing. It is time for a wholesale reevaluation of the facts in the Syrian crisis – beginning on day one, from the ground up, without any of the old assumptions that inhibit investigation outside of the bad-guy-good-guy theme. Maybe there aren’t any good guys in Syria? Or maybe the crisis in Syria is less about Syrians than it is about the geopolitical aspirations of others? We will only know this more decisively if we scroll back to Hashem’s April 2011 timeline to find out who hijacked the peaceful protests in Syria. Was it the regime – or the regime-changers? Unless we trace this back to the beginning, any step forward will be proceeding deaf, dumb and blind in Syria.

Original source: Alakhbar English

Sharmine Narwani is a commentary writer and political analyst covering the Middle East. You can follow Sharmine on twitter @snarwani.

Editing: Debbie Menon

Al Jazeera exodus: Channel losing staff over ‘bias’

 

 

Al Jazeera journalists quit channel citing bias on Syria coverage

 

 

Bookmark and Share

Short URL: http://www.veteranstoday.com/?p=197636

The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT or any other VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners and technicians. Legal Notice

Posted by on Apr 4 2012, With 0 Reads, Filed under Americas, Bahrain, Britain United Kingdom, Editor, Europe, Iran, Middle East, Syria, World. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

COMMENTS

To post, we ask that you login using Facebook, Yahoo, AOL, or Hotmail in the box below.
Don't have a social network account? Register and Login direct with VT and post.
Before you post, read our Comment Policy - Feedback

Comments Closed

5 Comments for “Surprise Video Changes Syria “Timeline””

  1. Key points missed all over the place. You just don’t get off the couch and kill 9 Syrian troops that happen to be ‘mechanized’ and get away with it. How many were killed from snipers, IED’s, mortors? That would be key. How many ‘peace lovers that hate their government were killed in the exchange’? That’s the entire story if you’re familiar with getting shot at.

    This story would read entirely differect if there was air cover from NATO. Then Gordo would have so much ink to splay onto our screens about a ‘real’ revolution, it would make you think 30 people actually toppled the Lybian government…. But, it isn’t like that is it? We have very aggressive and tactically competent folks out their taking names don’t we? Unmolested even? Sheesh, pretty good for satellite couch surfers who can’t spell Syria. I mean….COULD WE ACTUALLY HAVE A REAL REVOLUTION, FOR THE PEOPLE FOR ONCE IN LYBIA-Er Syria? To quote the omniscient one.

    Always from Lebenon, never from the center of the country. Where are the rebels elsewhere? Same shit, different lie. Let me guess, they have the latest Russian anti tank RPG’s? Perhaps SA-58′s with full auto as well? Oil dripping off them still? Yeah, smells like Gordon won’t touch this one. Too obvious.

    Thank the Russians and Chinese for the fact that the “paid” don’t get to lie to us on this one…..

  2. Sharmine, you are a star that illuminates the path we walk.
    Why don’t journalists put out these videos immediately? I would think it dangerous to play the look what I have game. How many have met unfortunate accidents playing that?
    And again, wonderful that you show the two sides of the conflict, and those caught in the middle. Anytime I can read what you have written is a good day. Too bad duff can’t write like you.
    I wonder if they did the same to quadaffi- Kill some protesters, blame them on quadaffi, get the world morally outraged, and kill everyone that’s left. I’m glad it is not going so easily for them this time.

  3. What’s disturbing about your article is that you equate the regime with the opposition. When reporting on Israel, do you report on the flaws of the Palestinian side, I can answer it is “no”. The intellectual dishonesty is weighed by journalistic ethics, which do not outweigh your humanistic standards which should be first and foremost. It is very clear the Palestinians are the victims, and so are the Syrian people. Most people of “normal” intelligence realize the Syrian regime is criminal. Most people of normal intelligence realize the Israeli government is criminal. Detractors like to show the other side is criminal. The Iranian regime, Hezbollah and the Iraqi Sadrists back the Syrian regime, and yes they are criminal. So it is geopolitical, and religious, and economic and regime change, what a surprise! Your fallacious reporting on equating the regime with the opposition is disgusting. That’s some journalistic integrity, you should be proud. Meanwhile the regime clearly targets innocent children, and yes the opposition targets regime soldiers, which side are you on again?? You’re pathetic, as this trash of a website that publishes the likes of you. Congrats on this great revelation!

  4. Youssef - Beirut

    Good idea!

    And while you are at it, why don’t you push the timeline back until the early 70′s so everyone can see what a fantastastic peace loving and caring regime the Assad dynasty has been for the Syrian and Lebanese people?

  5. Brilliant highlights by Miss Narwani. It truly is an information war. Knowledge is power.

Comments are closed

 

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Join Our Daily Newsletter
  View Newsletter ARCHIVE

WHAT'S HOT

  1. MSM Ignore International and Constitutional Law
  2. US warplanes to fly from Iraqi air base: Pentagon
  3. Hamas, Hezbollah fighting Israeli, ISIS terror: Pundit
  4. The Nuclear Truth about 9/11: A photographic portfolio
  5. Sotloff was Israeli agent, his execution staged: Analyst
  6. Ranking Member Michaud Discusses VA Reform with Secretary McDonald
  7. In Memoriam – World Trade Center
  8. 13th anniversary: Truthers chip away at 9/11 coverup
  9. The day the world fell down…9-11 was a nuclear attack
  10. Obama Takes Hypocrisy to New Levels
  11. The Damned Dogs of War
  12. BBC shows its true psyops colors on Iran
  13. 9/11: The Mother of All Big Lies
  14. Cal State L.A. ranks as one of nation’s best colleges for veterans
  15. Alaric Sacks Ohio, Water Wars 2.0
  16. Bill Whittle, Alexander Solzhenitsyn, and Zionist Propaganda
  17. Canadian Security and Policy Institute Sold to Fortune 500 Company with IDF and US Military Ties
  18. Profitability and Immorality: Philosophical reflections on 9/11
  19. The Indecent Decade: Were the Twin Towers built to Self-Destruct?
  20. VT Nuclear Education: Japan
  1. PeterAG: True Tomer and Germany is targeted by the anglosaxons as well. They dont want to see anything grow in the earthly garden unless they get the bulk of the profit. ...
  2. helpingmind: "One of the weaknesses of Israeli psyops, and ours sometimes, is tending to reuse old scams... " No this would be... correct under 'normal' circumstances... but the scale of the psychic ...
  3. Worker Bee: And you probably also believe that the Palestinians cooperated with Hitler to murder Jews (yes, I have seen this claim made by Zionuts in order to justify crimes against the ...
  4. Charlotte NC Bill: I'm sure Aaron Klein isn't as despicable as he sounds....I'm almost sure...well, I really hope so.
  5. Charlotte NC Bill: It's really something how in-depth analysis is often banned...some sites just exist to push crap.

Veterans Today Poll

For over 60 years, US Taxpayers have been funding Israel, Palestine and Middle East. Are you happy with return on investment or would you prefer those monies be invested at home instead?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Archives