Gordon Duff is a Marine combat veteran of the Vietnam War. He is a disabled veteran and has worked on veterans and POW issues for decades.

Gordon Duff is an accredited diplomat and is generally accepted as one of the top global intelligence specialists. He manages the world's largest private intelligence organization and regularly consults with governments challenged by security issues.

Gordon Duff has traveled extensively, is published around the world and is a regular guest on TV and radio in more than "several" countries. He is also a trained chef, wine enthusiast, avid motorcyclist and gunsmith specializing in historical weapons and restoration. Business experience and interests are in energy and defense technology.

He is co-host of the popular VT Radio show Jim and Gordie Show.

Visit Gordon Duff's YouTube Channel

View Latest Posts >>>

Victor Bout Must Be Silenced!

Kidnapped and Imprisoned to Silence Him for Dealings With Bush and Israel Over 9/11

Nicholas Cage as Victor Bout

  …by  Gordon Duff,  Senior Editor


Victor Bout, the “Lord of War,” has been sentenced to 25 years in prison, supposedly for trying to sell two FBI agents “missiles” while he was hiding out in Bangkok. 

The same FBI agents were there to interview Dimitri Khalezov, VT staffer who they would also love to silence. 

With the massive amount of gun running that is done on the planet, with even western governments supplying rogue groups so they always have an ‘incident de jour’ that is just a phone call away, the intense focus on Mr. Bout caught our attention.

He was just not that big a deal to warrant that much heat. We knew of much larger and more dangerous operations being run that seemed to have major political protection.

The operation of selling automatic weapons to the Mexican drug cartels so that they can then be traced was a rare public example of some of the insanity that goes on. In almost every case the screw ups are hidden behind a national security classifications, the only god that is truly worshiped in the Intel world.

Independents do not really operate doing such things in the real world. They are working for somebody big…much bigger…who can protect you from prosecution with the age old get out of jail card: “He’s working for us.”

The following video shows a cruise type missile hitting the Pentagon. It was taken from a NORAD satellite at great distance. How do we know? We just do.

YouTube - Veterans Today -

Bout’s conviction is false.  His crime is a simple one, he supplied the Bush administration and its Israeli assault team headed by Mike Harari, Mossad Operations Chief, with the missile used to attack the Pentagon on 9/11.

Below find one of the interviews that simply don’t exist:

YouTube - Veterans Today -

The operational headquarters in Bangkok is also responsible for aiding in the Oklahoma City bombing blamed on Timothy McVeigh, the Bali bombings and other “false flag” terror attacks.

From CNN:

Moscow (CNN) — Russia criticized the United States on Friday for handing down a 25-year sentence to Russian arms dealer Viktor Bout, saying the verdict against him was “baseless and biased.”

Bout, who denies wrongdoing, was sentenced Thursday to 25 years behind bars by a federal judge in New York.

Bout, who was dubbed “the merchant of death” by his accusers, was convicted last year on four counts of conspiracy to kill Americans, acquire and export anti-aircraft missiles and provide material support to a terrorist organization.

Russia’s foreign ministry accused the United States of acting illegally when its agents arrested Bout in Thailand and of pursuing a political agenda after he was extradited to the United States to face trial.

Viktor Bout atty: ‘We intend to appeal’

In a statement, Russia accused the United States of seeking a forced confession by “creating intolerable conditions of detention, physical and psychological impact.”

In addition, the Russian foreign ministry said, U.S. authorities also encouraged a media campaign against Bout, which was bound to influence the jury.

The foreign ministry will do everything it can to bring Bout back to Russia, its statement said.


YouTube - Veterans Today -

Russia has demanded Bout’s release.  This means that Putin, despite his public pronouncements otherwise, is fully aware that Bush and Israel are responsible for 9/11.  Bout only supplied the weapon, he didn’t plan the attack.

He simply thought he was doing an arms deal with Israel and the United States, the same thing he had been doing for years.  This was his job and these were his actual clients.

Scrap Granit Missile Depicted in Popular Online Game

There was no “sting operation” involving Columbia and Stinger missiles, the whole thing was entirely invented.  Bout was detained on US demand to be silenced as he had spoken to too many people about how he resented being involved in 9/11.

Bout is innocent of any crime and the real criminals are living in safety and luxury though Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and others are not free to travel as they face arrest for war crimes involved in the illegal attack on Iraq.

We have direct confirmations on Bout’s account of his sale of a cruise type missile to the United States in 2001 and of attempts to recruit another Russian national to aid Israel in the execution of the Bali bombing.

Dimitri Khalezov (far left) with Bout (R) in Bangkok

VT correspondent and former member of the Soviet 12 Nuclear Directorate, Dimitri Khalezov has confirmed his meetings with Mike Harari of the Mossad.  He was with Harari and his son at a celebration of the 9/11 attack on September 12, 2001 in Bangkok.

Harari took full credit for planning the attack and spoke openly of it during the celebration, a breakfast in Bangkok.

Our VT correspondent took down every word and, in 2007, made a full and detailed report of this and the Bali bombing to FBI agents.

The agents admitted they were aware that 9/11 was an “inside job” and knew Harari was involved, admitted they had known for years.

Bout stated that a Granit missile, a Soviet cruise type missile was sold to the US for the Pentagon attack.  Films of the attack made by NORAD satellite show a missile but it is impossible to differentiate between a Granit or one of the American varieties.



YouTube - Veterans Today -

Ex-Mossad??? - Mike Harari in his later years

The real issue here between the US and Russia, between the US and Veterans Today, is the arrest and persecution of those who know too much.

We have had nearly 30% of our writing staff put on terror watch lists, funny thing, lists that companies we work with operate, imprisoned, illegally held in military psychiatric facilities or worse.

Reporting the news has always been difficult but now it is treated as an act of criminality.

We want the American government to release Dr. Aafia, Victor Bout and the thousands of “prisoners of economic convenience” that are still being held after Bush era kidnappings under the phony “war on terror.”

We would also like to see the real parties responsible for the Pentagon attack arrested, even if it doesn’t leave a single republican out of prison.

As for Victor Bout, he is in jail for 25 years to silence him on 9/11. We know this, we can prove it and now you know it. Do you hear me Mr. President?

 Editing:  Jim W. Dean   … A present below to our ‘special’ readers as a thank you from Veterans Today. This is a piece of history for your permanent files. Such things are not easy to come by. But we have many, so we thought we should share.

Mike Harari's diplomatic passport - One of them - with signatured note to Khazlevov


Related Posts:

The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT, VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians, or the Veterans Today Network and its assigns. LEGAL NOTICE - COMMENT POLICY

Posted by on April 6, 2012, With 0 Reads, Filed under Of Interest. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

FaceBook Comments

47 Responses to "Victor Bout Must Be Silenced!"

  1. The Rahnameh  April 8, 2012 at 10:41 pm

    My theory for 9/11 is this:

    UAVs. Real time (Truth) v. Videos (Explanation)

    1-REAL TIME – Morning of 9/11
    a) NYC: UAVS are flown in a W like formation (either one big one or several linked) into the WTC buildings which triggers an explosion cascade of some sort. Pancakes.
    b) Pentagon: UAV crashes into Pentagon in same or similar pattern.

    Work with this theory a little bit. UAVs can carry explosives, too. They are maneuverable in ways manned planes are not. They can be made to have big shells, etc. Who has a big UAV industry and access to our air corridors, even taping it across the river, high-fiving like field hockey gals when 3,000 were snuffed?

    2- VIDEO – Explanations – the misinformation
    NYC: UAVs reworked digitally to a plane. This explains why there is footage of eyewitnesses giving immediate testimony that what they saw was a “military like” plane, etc. On the video, it explains why the hole is a W and the plane is a passenger, commercial one.
    Pentagon: Blurry video looks like an abnormally fast, curiously shaped flying object. Have UAV(s) been considered? Can a UAV fly really fast and be rigged with explosives? This would give appearance of an aircraft incoming for the physical illusion necessary in real time.

    Also explains why no real airplane debris in the fields of the supposed crashed plane. Could UAV weight/density etc. be relevant here?

    Anyway you cut it, Larry Silverstein did not have the highest bid and yet won the first private control over the WTC sites ever in July of 2001. Michael Chertoff’s El Al and Security forces have invaded America. Netanyahu said Americans are easy to push around and 9/11 was good for Israel. Israelis taped 9/11 as it happened and high fived when the planes crashed. That is why the police were called in the first place, and the entire tri-state heard it from their local news affiliates.

    Guilt is certain. The above arguments, therefore, irrelevant. Amuse me though, and tell me if it was maybe UAVs (or better yet, tell me how I can rule them out)

    • Gerry  April 9, 2012 at 5:40 am

      “(or better yet, tell me how I can rule them out)”

      Make some arrests and then some deals. It wouldn’t be neccessary to even pull any kind CI kind of crap, just old fashioned police work. You know good cop bad cop kind of stuff. Gitmo or Tel Aviv, take your choice! 10 years and were only more divided than ever. Planes, no planes, Golden Hawk UAVs, Scaler beams, Micro nukes, Nano thermite. This is turning into a bad B movie at the Bizzarro Theater.

      My own personal theory is that Nasferatu Guilliani’s cheap cologne broke down the atomic bonds of all that concrete, steel and asbestos, The ensuing compression of collapsing materials achieved critical mass vaporising the missing debris and creating all the residual heat as well. Tritium and deuterium were daughter products of the disintegrated SEC records and gold bars in #7. There you go, cased solved in one paragraph. Go home and take your Prozac 😉

    • stephanwilliams  April 10, 2012 at 9:48 pm

      Gerry, you’re a genius.

  2. kevin barnett  April 8, 2012 at 11:45 am

    this will slowly more and more make them uncomfortable.all over the globe this shit hits the fan-in addition to the other stuff that makes these rats visible to humans.feels good for the day of reckoning will come.it’s not anymore only us that have to endure fear and drown in confusion.it’s now them that face extermination possibilities in many many countries.it makes me sleep well to know that they can be wiped out.they slowly become our equal due to our numbers and massive vast information access.the identification and their visibility and the fire arms we have drowns their security slowly.in this circus of fools called america the jews might become the clowns.let the dance begin.

    • For Goodness Sakes  April 9, 2012 at 11:49 am

      Hi Kevin,

      What do you think of the hoax video? Don’t you think it discredits 9/11 truth?
      Do you support this lie?

      Quote:”The following video shows a cruise type missile hitting the Pentagon. It was taken from a NORAD satellite at great distance. How do we know? We just do.”

  3. ron101  April 8, 2012 at 11:05 am

    This is a great article, and I am glad to see Khalezov back in the spotlight as he deserves.
    but 2 of the videos are confirmed false:

    The “I saw a cruise missile hit” witness testimony, is misleading and false .watch it in full :

    I do believe Khalezov testimony about the Granit missile.
    But that video depicting a missile hitting the pentagon is a hoax.
    it is a missile composite added to a 2006 stock footage of Washington DC aerials

    btw Gordon ,answering your question in the post – I got the info from James Fetzer’s comment

    • For Goodness Sakes  April 9, 2012 at 11:45 am

      Thanks for the links. It’s clear the footage used is from the stock footage on google video.


      It’s been debunked as a hoax a long time ago, so why would Mr. Duff and crew LIE about it?????????????

      Quote:”The following video shows a cruise type missile hitting the Pentagon. It was taken from a NORAD satellite at great distance. How do we know? We just do.”

      That is a complete lie. It is easily proven a lie. And they know it.

      So why lie about it?

      To discredit the 9/11 Truth ‘movement’, that is the only reason I can come up with, unfortunately.

      Extremely disappointing, Mr. Duff. Could you at least explain why you have done this?

  4. Gerry  April 8, 2012 at 6:37 am

    I have never really concentrated on the minutiae of detail about the Pentagon. But if I remember correctly this was a newly reinforced outer wall. The initial damage was focused down to a cylindrical set of penetrations that expanded from small hole in the inner ring, to what was maybe 40, 50 feet at the exterior before the fires made it much larger. Negligible collateral damage to the adjacent structure. Targeting prowess that would make Lee Harvey blush, taking out a bunch of forensic accountants who were trying to figure out how many pallets full of dead presidents you can fit on a C130 at a time. No 550mph, 767 x 300,000 lbs would cause that pattern of damage, or disintegrate afterwards. The damage pattern appears specific by design. Either a cruise missile with a with a package of DU and HE, or what’s that word that I just can’t seem to get out of my head, Aneutronic, .01Kt focused effect from inside out, while everybody is chasing ghost planes or Tomahawks? Just a thought.

    293 perps identified. I doubt 3 of them know the whole story. But somebody does. All together it’s there waiting to be reconstructed, and a little time at Gitmo doing morning prayers would scare the fear of Satan out of some of them.

    • Gordon Duff  April 8, 2012 at 9:56 pm

      It is aeronauctically impossible for a 767 to fly over 200 mph at minimum heights.

      At 560 mph, it would be over 25000 feet high or the wings would come off and engines burn out.

      maybe the pentagon floated up into the air on john hagee’s hot air?

    • Gerry  April 9, 2012 at 5:16 am

      I’m aware of Ground Effect on th airframe and dense air on the engines. And how only in an alternate universe could any airliner do what the CorpGov claims. And that even in the minutely slim chance that if a “plane” some how scored a bullseye in a decent, knocking over light poles with nothing but it’s wake, the crash damage would not have been anything like what has been observed.

      What makes me sick is that the evidence is available to determine the truth. But in 10 years not one single Prosecutor, General, Poltroon, or anyone has stood up and demanded the videos successfully. They could easily paint us as cooks with 5 seconds worth. But just like BOs BC it’s turned into a dog and pony show while the NWO has inexerably ground on.

  5. The Rahnameh  April 8, 2012 at 12:08 am

    With my right hand, I firmly grasp Hariri’s chin.

    With my left hand, I firmly grasp the back of Hariri’s head.

    Push, pull, push, pull…twist 3000 times. Furiously.

    • The Rahnameh  April 8, 2012 at 10:28 pm

      oooh…nice call on the dibs. I don’t think you can really call dibs on something like that though.

      …shotgun Cheney 😉

  6. Mike Kay  April 7, 2012 at 8:57 pm

    Mr. Duff,
    The picture that emerges here is one of insane criminals willing to do absolutely anything. Right now, they still have a lock on things, but that lock is starting to slip, and they know it.
    Now that they have thrown Mr. Bout under the bus they think they’ve buried this thing, but paradoxically, they have merely provided it with more muscle.
    WE DON’T NEED ANY MORE EVIDENCE. We already are firmly aware of the circumstances of 911. We already understand the impossibility of government trying itself. We already know that 911 was a conspiracy of the first degree. More evidence is great. More evidence helps make the case, but those who will nitpick over the evidence will never be convinced by any number of facts that 911 was a coup, a murderous conspiracy, an opening shot in the war on America.
    Those who think, naively, that their government would never murder their own for more power, more control, more money, will never be convinced by any evidence. They prefer the comfort of the fantasy trip over reality, escapism rather than realization. These are the minions who will be packing the car when the government tells them to get to their nearest safe, FEMA camp. They will lecture the unwilling, telling everyone how big brother is there to protect them. When they hear the bolt on the automatic rifle slam home, they will imagine that their new prison guard is armed to defend them from the “bad guys”. They won’t get it, until they see the little flashes coming from the muzzle, that their time as a useful idiot is over.
    Mr. Bouts time as a useful idiot is over. No doubt, he will meet a surprising and unfortunate end via an enraged inmate if he dares to continue to tell his story.
    I don’t see anything in this country worth fighting for, other than the promise of the future generations. It is, in my opinion, our duty to do what we can for them as this shitstem tears itself apart.

  7. Gerry  April 7, 2012 at 8:09 pm

    Quit chasing your tails. Something hit all the buildings and made the divot in PA. Nobody is arguing about that. Whatever hit the Pentagram is ensconced in many videos somewhere. And if its Tesla’s 767 there are hundreds of stills somewhere of the debris. It’s not as important as, WE KNOW WHO DID IT. Somebody will roll over!

    • Gerry  April 7, 2012 at 8:13 pm

      Maybe you should start with Cheney. Maybe he’s had a change of heart 😉

  8. Ann  April 7, 2012 at 6:51 pm

    That photo of Harari is really sleazy. He looks barely able to focus on the camera, like he’s flea-bitten and still crocked and hung over on bad liquor after spending the night sleeping in an rainy alleyway amid rummaging rats. They’re probably his pets anyway. I hope he’s back in his hive. We have enough of his vermin friends here as it is.

  9. For Goodness Sakes  April 7, 2012 at 11:16 am

    In regard to the so-called missile hit the pentagon video, There are faked images in that grainy, blotchy, low rez video, which could come from a video game for all I know. Take a look at the images at:

    http ://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/munitions/agm-86c-pics.htm

    and compare to images in the video.

    Also check out the fictional U’K film from 2008, The Orion Conspiracy.

    We need better evidence than that! Certainly evidence which DOES NOT CONTAIN FAKED IMAGES.


    • Charlotte NC Bill  April 7, 2012 at 3:59 pm

      Gen Stubblebein, Chief of Arny Intell, said no plane hit the Pentagon…The NTSB said Flt 77 never flew low enough to hit the Pentagon…The NTSB also said that the cockpit door never opened after take-off…Army Spec April Gallop grabbed her injured baby and crawled through the hole created by the missile and saw no wreckage of a 767…Mark Harris of CNN reported seeing no wreckage of a 767…The lone piece of scrap oddly, obviously placed on the lawn was traced back to an AA flight that crashed in Columbia a few yrs before….No plane hit the Pentagon…the remote electronic hijackers probably dumped the poor souls in the ocean…How many times do we have to close this case?

    • For Goodness Sakes  April 9, 2012 at 12:38 pm

      And using fraudulent video footage and images makes the case how?????????????

  10. martin  April 7, 2012 at 9:42 am

    Dimitri Khalezov’s own extensive report on the Victor Bout “Merchant of Death” case is telling a different story. According to him Bout is not a weapons dealer at all and he was framed by the Russian government. Just google for “Most_shocking_interview_English.pdf”. It is a most interesting read, and go there before it also disappears from the internet like Dimitri’s other websites!

  11. facebookprogrammer  April 7, 2012 at 9:20 am

    Gordon, I watched a) the entire 26-part series with Dimitri Khalezov (many times believe it or not) and b) your 1.5 hour discussion with Dimitri and Kevin. Both excellent and it’s amazing how Dimitri is able to prove the science of 9/11, especially given his military expertise.

    In Dimitri’s 26-part series, he describes perfectly how WTC7 came down and precisely where the 150 KT ground zero was occurred. He the ground zero went off along the longer side of 7 therefore partially destroying Fiterman Hall across the street. Just came across this incredible photo and notice Fiterman Hall across the street how it is completely pulverized FROM THE GROUND UP in the corner that faces WTC7.

    Futhermore, if you Google ‘GROUND ZERO’ you come across the first article which is Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ground_zero and @ the bottom they describe the first mentions of the term ‘Ground Zero’ that were used that morning. In intelligence, you know the first thing to study is the response protocol that was followed that morning (first responders FBI/Secret Service) and they were all using this term that morning. Says so in the Wiki. Also, if you watch the video of WTC7 before it came down with Secret Service OST Bennette you will see a) there were no fires during his interview in WTC7 but he was still evacuating and b) he was wearing VRU head gear which is designed to protect against fallout!

    Just my 2 cents Canadian :)

  12. Brian  April 7, 2012 at 8:22 am

    Gordon I admire the work you do at VT, but the hole in the Pentagon shown in the video is not an entry hole, it is an exit hole. The exit hole was probably made by a shaped charge. The Pentagon was hit by an airplane. This post might get deleted but people should do a Goggle search Jamie McIntyre photograph 911 pentagon and click on the lineofdeparture.com link and look at the thousands of shards of an airplane at the Pentagon.

    • Gordon Duff  April 7, 2012 at 9:17 am


      As no “wing loaded” airplane can fly over 200 mph under 150 feet and the one you tell of flew 560 mph at 15 feet underground, I will place this with the other statements you and Mike Rivero make.

      Of course, you have been sent the aerodynamic reports, years ago.

      Perhaps it was a tiny plane, like you see in the video, rocket powered, tiny wings, no passengers.

      That plane?

    • Brian  April 7, 2012 at 9:34 am

      Excerpts from an article:

      Hani Hanjour may not have been up to the task, but a 757’s flight control computer seems sufficient. It’s equipped with radar altimeters and accurate GPS monitors for precise altitude and position tracking. It can analyze and respond to conditions hundreds of times per second. Examples of the extreme capabilities of fly-by-wire systems are reverse swept-wing aircraft, which are inherently unstable and require rapid adjustment of the plane’s control surfaces.

      Excerpts from another article:

      A fact frequently cited as evidence that the aircraft that attacked the Pentagon on 9/11/01 was not Flight 77, a Boeing 757, is that the aircraft tracked by air traffic controllers made a spectacular spiral dive, losing 7000 feet and turning 270 degrees in about 2.5 minutes — a maneuver alleged to be impossible for a 757. A September 12, 2001 CBS News report described the maneuver:

      Radar shows that Flight 77 did a downward spiral, turning almost a complete circle and dropping the last 7000 feet in two-and-a-half minutes.
      Air traffic controller Danielle O’Brien told ABC News that the maneuver was not one expected of a jetliner:

      The speed, the maneuverability, the way that he turned, we all thought in the radar room, all of us experienced air-traffic controllers, that that was a military plane.

      However, the fact that the plane was being flown in a manner not typical for a jetliner does not mean it was not a jetliner. A 757 is capable of rather extreme maneuvers: It is capable of taking off on one engine, and can execute pitch accelerations of over 3.5 Gs (gravities) as demonstrated by the following incident report of an IcelandAir 757-200:

      REPORT 7/2003 – Date: 22 January 2003
      serious incident to icelandair BOEING 757-200 at oslo airport gardermoen norway 22 january 2002 At this time the First Officer called out PULL UP! – PULL UP!. The GPWS aural warnings of TERRAIN and then TOO LOW TERRAIN were activated. Both pilots were active at the control columns and a maximum up input was made. A split between left and right elevator was indicated at this time. It appears the split occurred due to both pilots being active at the controls. The pilots did not register the aural warnings. During the dive the airspeed increased to 251 kt and the lowest altitude in the recovery was 321 ft radio altitude with a peaked load factor of +3.59 gs.

      Brian: The air traffic controllers thought it was a military plane, THEY DID NOT THINK IT WAS A MISSILE. None of the air traffic controllers stated they saw the plane fly away from the Pentagon.

    • Gordon Duff  April 8, 2012 at 9:53 pm

      I got you a movie of a cruise missile, the government released on that is mildly consistent but not possible a plane.

      What do you have?


    • Brian  April 9, 2012 at 2:35 pm

      Gordon, we’ve had discussions about what hit the Pentagon in comments sections and via email numerous times. I’ve made a very strong case an airplane hit the Pentagon. I’m not going to bring out all the evidence again.

      I would like to have a gathering of all the eyewitnesses including those who saw an airplane flying very fast at a very low level, those who saw the airplane clip light posts and those who actually saw the airplane hit the Pentagon and see how they react when you tell them they did not see an airplane do those things. I think after you listened to them you would probably agree with them an airplane hit the Pentagon.

      Perhaps you can interview Jamie McIntyre. His photograph of the thousands of shards of an airplane at the Pentagon is powerful evidence an airplane hit the Pentagon.

      Nobody saw a missile.

      By the way, even people in the no plane hit the Pentagon crowd say the video is a fake.

  13. martin  April 7, 2012 at 1:18 am

    Have a look at http://www.911-truth.net and to be more precise at http://www.911-truth.net/Victor_Bout/Most_shocking_interview_English.pdf.
    This is Dimitri Khalezov’s extensive report on the Victor Bout “Merchant of Death” case. According to him he is not a weapons dealer at all and he was framed by the Russian government. It is an interesting read, and go there before this website also disappears from the internet like Dimitri’s other websites!

  14. adeUK  April 6, 2012 at 11:55 pm

    01/26 Dimitri Khalezov – The Third Truth about 9/11


    Interview with Dimitri Khalezov, a former nuclear intelligence officer of the 12 Chief Directorate of the Russian armed forces about his book ‘The Third Truth about 9/11’.
    Dimitri Khalezov is a well known 911 researcher and maintains that a Granit missile hit the Pentagon on 911.
    His website: http://www.911thology.com/home.html
    Visit also the blog: http://emvsinfo.blogspot.com/

  15. Charlotte NC Bill  April 6, 2012 at 4:05 pm

    Many people in the DC area ( real people not pre-positioned “witnesses” like the professional actor at the WTC ” oh, yes..I witnessed the whole thing; first one tower came down and then the other-probably structural failure due to the intense heat…” Yeah, thanks man-on-the-street…) reported seeing what they described as a “small commuter jet” which is pretty much what that Granit looks like to me..even more if it were speeding by on a mission to kill some accountants…

    • Gordon Duff  April 6, 2012 at 5:15 pm

      I keep waiting for that russian building to ‘pancake’
      so far 10 days and the first piece of steel hasn’t even gotten warm

      must be cold there


    • Gerry  April 6, 2012 at 6:45 pm

      IHOP Tower. Nah the Russians don’t watch enough of Bill OReilly, The Bloviator or That Great American.

  16. Charlotte NC Bill  April 6, 2012 at 4:01 pm

    It’s a joke..The only reason most people I know pay ANY attentio to the MSM is to know what they’re trying to sell us and what direction they’re going in..( are they going to blow-up the Sears Tower of Hoover Dam…Or the USS Enterprise or some other USN ship on the Persian Gulf ? ) but not for any actual news..This internet thing may have caught TPTB a little flat-footed but they’ll corral it when they feel they have to..The only answer is to put Mossad/Harriri/Suter/Silverstein/Goff-P-Tech/Zakheim in the same paragraph as 9-11 on as many sites as possible..Every MSM talking head needs to be confronted with the evidence tieing-in the real perps whenever the subject of mythological ” transnational terror ” is brought up.

    • Justin Kennedy  April 6, 2012 at 7:47 pm

      You shouldn’t jest about blowing up the Sears Tower…Larry Silverstein bought it last month. Dimitri said he saw the nuclear demolition plans for the WTC and Sears Tower, which was ordered to evacuate on 9/11.

    • Charlotte NC Bill  April 7, 2012 at 4:04 pm

      I wasn’t joking…I expect them to do something..Why shouldn’t they? Can’t they get away with anything now? Especially after this new NDAA…And then maybe not. A fellow folded a $10 bill a certain way and it looked like the Hoover Dam exploding…Who knows what they’ll do..Hard to imagine Larry the Lizard playing the same tune…And then maybe not so hard.

  17. Derek X  April 6, 2012 at 3:56 pm

    Getting tough on the Prez? About time. Interesting article, and wouldn’t mind seeing some more meat on the subject.

    • Gordon Duff  April 6, 2012 at 5:08 pm


      He has an appeal going on. We can’t put things he says online while legal stuff is going.


    • Latney Davis  April 6, 2012 at 7:53 pm

      Personally, I am extremely satisfied to read ‘your’ response to Derek. “Mr. President” has been an unqualified adulation for the “office” and “office holder” for decades now. I am glad I read this before “slobbering something ignorant above”. I “get it” and will continue to impatiently “watch/wait”.

    • tomasestrada-palma  April 6, 2012 at 10:20 pm

      Just can’t beat that Russian steel. Has anyone tried to melt it with 9/11 diesel fuel yet?

  18. PhilipShahak  April 6, 2012 at 3:43 pm

    I read an article in VT last year titled ‘Anatomy of a Frame’ a read about Dimitri’s claim that it was a Russian ‘Granit’ missile. I did some research and found that Janes military journal confirmed that the Russian sub ‘Kursk’ had one ‘Granit’ unaccounted for when it was raised.
    Don’t remember how I found out that India had a joint venture with Russia to develop a cruise missile based on the ‘Granit’ called the ‘Bhramos’ but here is a promo video. It looks a lot like the missile that hit the pentagon to me.

  19. PAUL LEO FASO  April 6, 2012 at 3:22 pm

    The President cannot hear anything at this moment but the flutter of cash coming in for the next election.
    Neither he or Mint Robbed Me, aka Mitt Romney, have any time for the residual elements of the truth behind 9/11. They and the media charade will do everything to avoid that topic, for lying in the radiated dust at the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, and the open pit of deception in a field in Pennsylvania, are the answers to the crime that killed the American dream, that was kidnapped, raped and murdered in front of all of us.

    Victor Bout may know the outside story of what hit the Pentagon, but my interest lies on who knows the inside story of what hit the Pentagon. This President should have Former Air Force General Clapper, you know the one that headed up the Pentagon’s National Geospatial Intelligence Agency on 9/11, spinning in his seat with the answers as to who released , the blurred, edited, photoshopped distortion of nothingness of whatever hit the Pentagon on that day. You would think the General with years of interpreting photographic and video imaging would find out who within our own military, altered the released Government footage as evidence of a commercial airplane compromising the most highly defended and surveilled building on the planet.

    The reason I say that is because every time I see that Government 5 frame insult to our intelligence, I am reminded of the 3000 or more Americans whose deaths are left unavenged to this day.

    You would think this President, upon hearing of General Clapper’s subsequent rise to command all 16 National Defense Intelligence Agencies, after being confirmed by the Senate and not even asked in those confirmation hearings to answer why, in all of his years at his post, did the General fail in that duty to find out who was responsible for that video alteration. Furthermore, you would think this President would ask the General what qualifies him to keep his post now, when we have our military out hunting for enemies of freedom all over the world and failing to look right inside command headquarters for over 10 years.

    You cannot get the President to hear one voice, but millions of voices are about to spell it out-


    • Gerry  April 6, 2012 at 3:46 pm

      I’d wait until Crapper confessed and then waterboard him 138 times.

      But the MO has changed little. Names like Stubbledine and Partin come to mind. Open your mouth and the Jackboot labels you a conspircy theorist. Well Mel Gibson was right. Just like the boy who cried wolf. The real moral is the wolf did eventually come

  20. Gerry  April 6, 2012 at 2:45 pm

    And now the avalanche of 911 evidence picks up speed. A new article from Asia Times illucidating the put options placed prior to 911:

    Insider trading 9/11 … the facts laid bare
    By Lars Schall


    Copy and paste into the address bar adding www up front. Didn’t want to wait for moderation, Hope that’s OK.

    • DaveE  April 6, 2012 at 4:55 pm

      Great link, well worth the time to digest. Thanks.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login