There is NO Move by the US Against Assange, Darling of the Right
… by Gordon Duff, Senior Editor
Assange, for those, many my own friends, who are too dumb to find their cars in their own driveway, is wanted for sex crimes in Sweden, not even a NATO country. After all these years, there has been no legal action against Assange in the US, none threatened, none planned, all just made up.
Netanyahu personally vouches for Assange, the power of the Washington Israel Lobby, perhaps the most dangerous force on earth, continues to serve Assange.
Why would someone who released all of his material sifted and, according to Zbigniew Brzezinski, actually written by AIPAC and the Mossad, then again by the New York Times, be an enemy of the NWO?
Assange may be running the whole thing, after all, he is a 9/11 holocaust denialist, advocates the persecution of the Palestinian people openly, advocates war on Iran openly, is silent on drug running in Afghanistan and, though he has leaked material, follows Pentagon policy as though he were drawing a pay check.
As for the Wikileaks website itself, it has no material of interest. Assange only gives material to his “handlers” who release what the rich and powerful want released, when they want it released and much of that material has been proven to have been created, as Brzezinski calls it in this Veterans Today article from December 10, 2010:
“This week, Judy Woodruff of PBS interviewed Zbigniew Brzezinski and Stephen Hadley, former national security advisers for presidents Carter and Bush. The subject of the interview was Wikileaks.
Such interviews seldom reveal much, though Brzezinski is one of the most controversial figures of our times, tied to endless conspiracies and rumored to head many of the secret societies tasked with maintaining the New World Order.
The interview is available in full at PBS. For the most part, Hadley offers little or nothing of substance, much as when he served as national security adviser to President George W. Bush. Brzezinski, however, is another beast entirely.”
____________________
The interview is edited, with little exception, as monologue by Brzezinski:
ZBIGNIEW BRZEZINSKI: But I think the most serious issues are not those which are getting the headlines right now. Who cares if Berlusconi is described as a clown. Most Italians agree with that. Who cares if Putin is described as an alpha dog? He probably is flattered by it.
The real issue is, who is feeding Wikipedia on this issue — Wiki — Wiki — WikiLeaks on this issue? They’re getting a lot of information which seems trivial, inconsequential, but some of it seems surprisingly pointed. …The very pointed references to Arab leaders could have as their objective undermining their political credibility at home, because this kind of public identification of their hostility towards Iran could actually play against them at home.
Editor’s note: The use of the term, “pointed” is key. This indicates two classes of information and also begins building a hypothesis to support “intent.” If there is “intent” in the leaks, then they are an intelligence operation, not a leak.
It’s, rather, a question of whether WikiLeaks are being manipulated by interested parties that want to either complicate our relationship with other governments or want to undermine some governments, because some of these items that are being emphasized and have surfaced are very pointed.
And I wonder whether, in fact, there aren’t some operations internationally, intelligence services, that are feeding stuff to WikiLeaks, because it is a unique opportunity to embarrass us, to embarrass our position, but also to undermine our relations with particular governments.
Editor’s note: Brzezinski goes exactly there, indicating his belief that Wikileaks is tied to an intelligence agency. This is a full and direct challenge to the credibility of Wikileaks showing no reservations whatsoever.
For example, leaving aside the personal gossip about Sarkozy or Berlusconi or Putin, the business about the Turks is clearly calculated in terms of its potential impact on disrupting the American-Turkish relationship….the top leaders, Erdogan and Davutoglu and so forth, are using some really, really, very sharp language.
JUDY WOODRUFF: But this is 250 — it’s a quarter-of-a-million documents.
ZBIGNIEW BRZEZINSKI: Precisely.
JUDY WOODRUFF: How easy would it be to seed this to make sure that it was slanted a certain way?
ZBIGNIEW BRZEZINSKI: Seeding — seeding it is very easy. I have no doubt that WikiLeaks is getting a lot of the stuff from sort of relatively unimportant sources, like the one that perhaps is identified on the air. But it may be getting stuff at the same time from interested intelligence parties who want to manipulate the process and achieve certain very specific objectives.
Editor’s note: Brzezinski’s assertion is that “chickenfeed,” things off the news, low level “junk” intel is being “seeded” by an intelligence service to serve an agenda with “very specific objectives.” Can anything be more clear?
STEPHEN HADLEY : The — what we know or what has been said publicly is it looks like a data dump through a pretty junior-level person. So, in terms of that material, it looks like a data dump. Generally, in Washington, I have had the rule that, if there are two explanations, one is conspiracy and one is incompetence, you ought to go with incompetence. You will be right 90 percent of the time.
Editor’s note: The Obama administration withdrew the AIPAC spying convictions when it was clear that Stephen Hadley would be put on the stand by the defense. Hadley’s very close relationship with the defendants in this spy trial brings up a number of interesting questions which are not hard to answer if you read his response above.
ZBIGNIEW BRZEZINSKI: But, Steve, the other foreign intelligence services don’t have to wait for me to make that suggestion. I think they can think of it themselves, particularly after the first instance.
______________________
Now again, years later, reasonably respectable activist writers who describe themselves as “anti-Zionist” and “truth tellers” aren’t paying attention.
Wikileaks to intelligence professionals is very simple. It is an Israeli “cover and deception” program, run by them, financed by huge money, backed by Rupert Murdoch, the ADL, AIPAC and continually advocating right wing causes in the US, pushing for world war and covering for serious war crimes while reporting only select minor ones.
Secondly, much of Wikileaks material is simply invented, as a way of planting phony stories in the news. With the bulk of material, some of it useful, I have managed to turn some of it around and use it against Assange and the NWO he represents. That’s our job.
As for his personal life and sexual proclivities, that is a criminal matter in Sweden, between him and his alleged victims and the gang of billionaires that he represents.
Right now, Assange is taking front page on the controlled press across the world, all on command from Tel Aviv.
Here in the US, he got a couple of conveniently timed threats from half baked right wing nuts who take orders, minute by minute, from Netanyahu, Assange’s best friend, so as to make him look like a “victim,” the same way Israel tries to look when dropping cluster bombs on schools in Gaza.
Assange is a joke. Let him go to Ecuador, I hear the weather is lovely this time of the year. He doesn’t want to go, of course. To me, such an act makes me think he might actually be guilty of something in Sweden. As I am not a public official, I can say that much.
It’s one thing when the mainstream media gets its marching orders to spread conspiracy theory about the non-existent “witch hunt” over Assange.
Poor Bradley Manning was thrown to the wolves, blamed for crimes he could never have committed, especially documents from multiple departments, overseas embassies and so many things made up by an army of fabricationists in Tel Aviv.
The real suckers are the “anti-imperialists,” those willing to follow any scoundrel as long as they claim to be against the US and “NATO” although there is no evidence other than, as we point out so often, claims in the media that no “anti-imperialist” would ever admit to reading.
Problem is, they do read it, they are “sucked in” by propaganda and are the biggest pack of “tools” and “dupes” in the world.
As for Assange, he is the “mini-me” of Netanyahu, a Romney supporter, Islamophobic, right wing, anti-Palestinian, pro-war and 9/11 holocaust denialist.
Wikileaks, whose organization with its $50 million dollar servers. once successfully duping the world, pushing it toward war and providing cover for real imperialism, is trying to make a comeback with a new drama, deflecting the truth of sex crime charges and trying to make them look like what is an imaginary “extradition” to the United States.
When the US wants someone, they use rendition, a claimed right, and can get anyone they want, anywhere. If all the intelligence services in the world want Assange dead, why is he the safest man on earth?
Editing: Jim W. Dean
Related Posts:
Posted by Gordon Duff, Senior Editor on August 19, 2012, With 0 Reads, Filed under Of Interest. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
FaceBook Comments
41 Responses to "Assange “Witch Hunt” Dupes Activists, US Extradition Claims Bogus"
You must be logged in to post a comment Login














Assange was arrested for computer hacking when he was 18 or so but not charged ? (Not sure if this is entirely correct).
Maybe ASI0 put him on the payroll then ?
They’re also behind the asian-immigration explosion-undermining every other group’s cohesion-but their own…
Besides 9-11 it’s funny how Wiki never went into the opium and processed heroin being flown fm Afghanstn to Camp Bondsteel and the intelligence agencies that clean up on that along w/their drug lord allies…Wiki never went into the Mossad IED and sniper attacks on US troops in Iraq…or the Mossad and SAS car bombs in Iraq….never went into the blatantly stolen Pres election of ’04…never went into the Israeli-owned Merhav Group profiting fm the movemnt of their nat gas on the TAPI pipeline…never went into what actually hit the Pentagon…Israeli war crimes in Gaza/Lebanon..Talmudia’s nuke arsenal…
No doubt the minute that Assange sets foot in Sweden then the US will do the paperwork to get him.
Also the US currently has a law that means they can swoop into any country and capture an individual and take them back to the US for trial.
Assange would not get a fair trial in the US.
LOB2065
Why not simply use a drone?
Assange “Witch Hunt” Dupes Activists, US Extradition Claims Bogus. BS
http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvideo/110378/Sex_Lies_and_Julian_Assange_Full_Documentary_2012/
He “advocates the persecution of the Palestinian people openly, advocates war on Iran openly” and is “a Romney supporter, Islamophobic, right wing, anti-Palestinian, pro-war” – I have not seen him do so although I’ve followed the story a fair bit. Could you specify a source for these claims? They do not seem in keeping with anything I have heard or read him say, although he did make the dumb if standard claim about 9/11.
The Swedish claims btw are a joke if you bother to look into it, an obvious frame up from the start.
@Angus
“watched that video of the Apache attack numerous times, and am still left wondering why Julian & his crew would have been allowed access to that, much less to release it, considering the damage it HAS caused”
It’s my understanding that Assange did not initially release that video; but did successfully, with the help from the same venture-cap neo-con funders, sold the expose as his own.
From where I sit, Assange is a tool Zionists. If anyone has evidence to the contrary, please share.
Great stuff Gordon, what a pitiful spectacle was the balcony press conference. Assange is simply a non-event, there is absolutely nothing there. The fact that he was goimg to give a press conference was the leading story on our “quality” news last night in Australia. laughter is only possible response.
This is what counts as a firebreathing rebel in the vacuous and worthless world of the controlled press. The sad thing is that so many people are desperate to champion anyone who is seen as standing against the Empire that they buy the entire crock of nothingness.
Gordon,
the Breszinski interview – I’ve also seen a that time – shurely is very telling about his view, it is very analytic and realistic.
But recently, US ammbassy of Australia has released infos under the freedom of information act, showing that there might be more to this subject:
http://www.smh.com.au/national/us-intends-to-chase-assange-cables-show-20120817-24e1l.html
Now, we are all well aware of the Israeli influence on australian politics, from the political top to the bottom, but here may be some real substance behind this. What’s your view on this?
One thought to add.
I’m a bit suspicious about this aussie “information”, because I also read about the current developments in the Andrea Davison case, about which freedom spoke about in his upper post.
This is a plant in Murdoch’s Sydney Morning Herald…total bollocks
They have had years.
Simple answer, Detlef, there is NO authority within the United States currently reviewing any activity of Assanges.
The source of the real Wikileaks material is AIPAC, arrests were made, some prosecutions, but they were dropped.
Obama would never prosecute Assange because of how it would look and the other side is supporting him.
Assange is Mossad…
Gordon, I do not disagree with what you have written except that the Sydney Morning Herald is not and has never been a Murdoch paper. The SMH is the flagship of the rival Fairfax media group. Murdoch owns and publishes the SMH’s rival Sydney daily, the Daily Telegraph. An unbelievably worthless and despicable rag that cannot be trusted to report even sports stories without an agenda.
The SMH story is a beat up to dramatise this story. Assange has attained a laughable folk hero status among the pathetic hapless dupes of the Australian left and so the SMH is milking it.
Fairfax and the SMH are slowly dying and no longer worth reading, even online, there was an Irish writer named Paul McGeough who did a lot of writing for the SMH, his stuff is great, he ended up writing a book about the failed Mossad assassination of Khaled Mishal in Jordan in 1997 (Khaled Mishal remains very senior Hamas leader in exile) called Killing Khaled that is worth reading.
I don’t know GD. See post above.
Assange may or may not be a tool, but we do know for sure that he and other non-issues are being used as diversion from the wars, bio/enviro warfare being used on us, the upcoming martial law, etc.
What about the the empaneled grand jury in Alexandria, Virginia, in the Eastern District that is investigating anyone who can be connected to the WikiLeaks organization. It exists. The US Justice Department would not be investing resources into a case like this if it had no intention of eventually putting people on trial in the United States, would they?
Cass Sunstein ( Administrator of the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs) wants our government to prosecute and infiltrate “conspiracy theorists”..defined as ‘an effort to explain some event or practice by reference to the machinations of powerful people, who have also managed to conceal their role.’ Government agents (and their allies) might enter chat rooms, online social networks, or even real-space groups and attempt to undermine percolating conspiracy theories by raising doubts about their factual premises, causal logic or implications for political action.
There have been a lot of posts on Facebook about the fed kidnapping of a vet who made an non supportive post on our government.Starting NDAA?
The DHS FBI and other terrorists are out of control. It is one freak twist to BE the MAIN terrorists of the world and now US citizens, entitled to call everyone but themselves by that name. I know that a few people in those agencies are good people, but what how to excise the 2/3 who are not. In fact why is their a ‘dhs’ at all. Oh that’s right, sheep populace.
Peter Eyre posted on his site that the UK may actually be after someone named “Andrea Davison” rather than Assange at the embassy. She has info related to those missing nukes involving Blair, Cameron, Brown, etc. Fears she’ll see the same fate as Dr. David Kelly. http://eyreinternational.wordpress.com/2012/08/16/uk-may-raid-ecuador-embassy-in-london-but-who-are-they-actually-after/
Gordon, I heard you in interviews talking about that high level UK weapons scandal 1-2 yrs ago. You think he’s onto something here, and the celebrity-like focus on Assange is just distraction, while they do God-knows-what to her?
very much so, Eyre’s reporting on this is accurate.
Are we still playing the “find the missing nukes” game? …”It’s in Libya in a hospital! Oh no, now it’s in Syria hidden in one of the ‘chemical weapons’ storage areas!! Oh wait, now it’s in an ambulance driving towards Iran! Hurry USA, bomb the entire Middle East or else we’ll all die!!!”… Is this what’s going on again? Draw them a map with a big fat X on Dimona.
‘in an ambulance driving towards Iran’ – thanks for the ironic laugh I needed that.
Freedom
I have just read the link you provided above plus the links attached to it. Explosive!
Thank you for posting it. I suggest everyone read it if they are unsure if Assange is tool. Prior to reading the link I had my doubts but I have now come to that conclusion also. Thanks
Andrea Davison has to be protected by the public being aware of her plight. Two suicides would hard to keep under wraps.
Assange is such an obvious NWO tool one has a hard time exonerating him…The pissy attitude towards 9-11 Truth when 9-11 is now acknowledged as a “Jewish” achievement ( but those “Labor” Jews, not the Likudniks-get it right ) by prominent Rabbis..is just too much…combined w/his Rothschild lawyer…etc..Supposedly he was raised in a rather strange commune/cultish environment…Don’t remember all the details but it was supposedly run by a rather charismatic woman and there was a lot of drug experimentation…I guess that explains a lot..
I’ve never trusted Assange, but that doesn’t necessarily mean he’s on the take. He could be just naive and misguided and easily used, indiscriminately publishing everything he receives without necessarily trying to vet anything. Or he could be a willing participant in a devious psyop.
Regardless, we now have a situation where the lawless, Jew-controlled banana republic of England is trying to make an example out of an apparent “whistleblower”. And let’s be clear, the primary subject of the English attack isn’t really Assange himself, but the concept of national sovereignty, especially as wielded by a country like Ecuador, whose leadership seems to have some intolerable respect for moral and long-standing legal principles, and takes its civic responsibilities seriously.
Now, let’s face it, if we are to move away from the old-world order, where we are burdened with inconveniences like the UN Charter and the concept of inviolable national sovereignty, and if we are to implement the New-world order in its place, i.e., a perverse, one-world government run by Jewish supremacists for the benefit of the Jewish “race”, then let’s face it, we’re going to have to peck away at the old order – not by threats and blackmail and bribery and rendition and assassination (although these are effective tools and certainly have their respected place in our Masters’ toolbox), but ultimately by public acts.
Brutality and lawlessness and torture and oppression have to “come out of the closet” and become the publicly accepted norm. Once that happens, what good are “whistleblowers”? Once that happens, we only have ourselves to blame. Our Masters seek to create a world where we all openly accept, if not embrace, the beating of OWS protesters or the the machinegunning of innocent civilians from helicopters.
In their zeal to advance their Masters’ agenda, the Shabbos Goy puppet government of the pathetic English banana republic may have gone too far, too fast, and painted itself into a corner. The Empire is already stretched thin, and now it proposes to open yet another front in the war on national sovereignty?
Your post is a good one. Ecuador is making itself an example of a ‘good’ (by advantaging the duped who believe Assg is some kind of hero) and the cabal does not like that. But it is a mistake for Ecuador to take Assange, it does not need a troublemaker to raise the specter of trouble for itself. It should instead expose Assange and deny him.
Greenrecovery-As long as the American ppl believe in the war on terror , the gov. can fund whatever they want over there-good news tho, last night Colorado public tv had a 911 special questioning the OCT for fund raising. Before the illuminati buys that station somehow, we need to pass the word along- Harold- Assange’s childhood screams MK Ultra
You can still watch that documentary.
I suggest that people download and cut DVDs to pass to all and sundry.
Quote from Colorado Public TV announcement:
“Live Streamed: CPT12 will be streaming this important event over the Internet through Sunday, September 2, 2012, at:www.cpt12.org/911ExplosiveEvidence. Details of encore airings and public comments can be found at this link.”
Also suggest people post comments to that website for others to view:
http://www.cpt12.org/911ExplosiveEvidence
I see no effort to extradite the Jewish Roman Polanski to the USA, where he was convicted of essentially paedophilia with an under aged teenage girl, whereas Assange is only accused of not wearing a condom and not even charged at this stage. Polanski is protected by the Jewish Great Wall whereas Assange does not seem to be?
Double standards???
Not sure if Assange is a tool? The wiki-leaks saga has caused people to engage in debate. That is a good start. As a result of Wiki-leaks a lot more people are questioning lop sided media reporting and the numbers are growing.
It’s another bad commentary on the stupidity of Americans when Ecuador takes Assg surely knowing he is a tool, only doing so because the majority of the left believes A is some kind of hero. Ecuador must have believed it would be safer from, sorry to say it- imperialist attack- by taking A, but it would have been smarter for them to call A the tool he is, exposing him, and keeping yet another trouble maker out of their country. If he does end up residing there he should not be allowed any press or involvement with further wikileeky propaganda.
‘that has caused the Pentagon leaders to step up their search for solutions’. Here’s a solution, round up 2/3 of the govmt and put them in the camps.
As long as the American ppl believe in the war on terror , the gov. can fund whatever they want over there-good news tho, last night Colorado public tv had a 911 special questioning the OCT for fund raising. Before the illuminati buys that station somehow, we need to pass the word along
hey, was Monica A mk ultra beta slave?
yea, he just needed some relief and obviously he thought he was better protected by his elite handlers than he was- The elites live by their own code-they do everything they tell us not to do and more
Assange strikes me as the pea-brain type so any debriefing is probably not going very far. I read somewhere he has extremely bad body odor due to his poor hygiene habits. They probably had him out on the balcony speaking so they could air him out a bit.
Don’t forget the public castrations.
We don’t want them breeding any more.
Thanks green – you know the last few days I’m getting itchy about all sided propaganda, so here’s another view, from Paul Craig Roberts – ” Then Washington put out the story on the Internet that Assange was an intelligence agent working for the CIA or the even more hateful Mossad. Both leftwing and rightwing Internet sites fell for the obvious lie.’
Brzezinski is one of the nwo globalistas of course, in an open secrets fake antagonist way(?) So who the hell knows.
You know it’s the one thing I agree with the vile cabal on, controlling breeding. Not the way they want to do it, but I’ve always been a populationist. – As for their lifetime in camp, we use Manning’s current treatment as the bar, and go just below it.
She belonged to the Tribe…….
An Oz with hygiene problems? Heaven forfend, they’re the jokers who always claim the Poms hide their money under a bar of soap.