JOIN TEAM VT | SIGN UP DAILY NEWSLETTER
VETERANS TODAY ON : FACEBOOK | TWITTER | VT FORUM
|

The Republican Convention and the Ron Paul Revolution

by Sartre

 

Bookmark and Share

Short URL: http://www.veteranstoday.com/?p=221520

The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT or any other VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners and technicians. Legal Notice

Posted by on Sep 3 2012, With 0 Reads, Filed under Government, Politics. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

COMMENTS

To post, we ask that you login using Facebook, Yahoo, AOL, or Hotmail in the box below.
Don't have a social network account? Register and Login direct with VT and post.
Before you post, read our Comment Policy - Feedback

Comments Closed

14 Comments for “The Republican Convention and the Ron Paul Revolution”

  1. I can agree with almost all Ron Paul stands for. One exception is that he, purportedly, wants to save or reform the federal government.
    The problem here is fairly demonstrated by a comparison between the MAFIA and the federal government. Which has perpetrated more numerous and more heinous crimes? Reflect on this a few moments; I think you would conclude the MAFIA resembles a choir boy when standing next the the federal government; actually, ANY American government (see, for example any police department of any American city).
    So, would you attempt to reform the MAFIA? More, would you work to elect a man as ‘big cheese’ of the MAFIA?
    If not, why in the world would you attempt to reform an organization a hundred times more criminal than the MAFIA?
    What’s the alternative? Try this, http://redressone.wordpress.com/next-dark-age/

  2. Sartre – for some reason my original comment disappeared and has not subsequently been posted. In summary I stated that I generally agreed with your position – but pointed out that the cabal is able to enforce it’s influence wherever and whenever it wishes.

    For example – much is being made now by the controlled media in the determination to disarm all Americans under some UN convention that no doubt the new world order will want to see enforced. All the ‘equality’ legislation is carefully re-written and implemented insofar as it holds us all in a straight-jacket of do’s, don’t's and thought control parameters.

    If an early UN regulation does not sit well with the new world order plotters, however, it is given scant regard and quietly filed away out of sight. Especially ones that provide citizens with rights to speak their mind – like the following one:

    “On December 10th 1948, the General Assembly of the United Nations adopted and proclaimed the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Following this historic act the Assembly called upon all Member countries to publicize the text of the Declaration and to cause it to be disseminated, displayed, read and expounded principally in schools and other educational institutions, without distinction based on the political status of countries or territories”

    ARTICLE 19: Everyone has the right to freedom of opinions and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.

    (The new world order and it’s lackeys HAVE ALREADY clearly violated this – and aim to further ride roughshod over it until there are no voices of dissent to their plans published anywhere).

    • Excalibur,

      No disagreement with what you write. The NWO is engaged in an extermination policy designed to eliminate folks like us.

      SARTRE

  3. Sartre, For some reason my comment on this article has disappeared – perhaps for checking – so in the meantime I thought I would give you the text from an article I found in the Catholic Times, 8th June 1997. Apologies if somewhat off topic:

    BOOK ATTACKS REFORMS OF POPE PAUL VI.
    Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger’s autobiography looks set to break all known records set by priestly memoirs, other than those released by Pope John Paul II and his predecessors. The book, released in April in Italy, has stormed to the top of the non-fiction lists and garnered attention for its forthright views, provoking controversy in many quarters.
    Particularly contentious has been the Cardinal’s claim that the manner in which Pope Paul VI reformed the Mass in 1969 caused “extremely serious damage” to the Church. While many of the liturgical changes were needed, the suppression of the old Mass marked a “break in the history of the liturgy, the consequences of which could only be tragic,” the head of the Vatican’s doctrinal congregation said.
    “I am convinced that the ecclesial crisis in which we find ourselves today depends in great part on the collapse of the liturgy”, the German Cardinal said. The book’s German title translates as: ‘From my life: Remembrances 1927 to 1977′.
    In 1969 Pope Paul VI issued his ‘General Instruction on the Roman Missal’ revising the Order of Mass and related prayers. The old Mass rite was to be banned, with few exceptions, after a transition period of several months.
    “I was dismayed by the ban on the old Missal, since such a development had never been seen in the history of the liturgy”, a somewhat disheartened Cardinal Ratzinger said.
    “The impression given was that this was completely normal”.

  4. “re-institution of constitutional and bill of right precepts no longer are part of the Republican hierarchy agenda”

    Those have not been on the Republican agenda since the 1912 presidential campaign.

  5. I am sure that Sartre Batr’s take on this scenario is correct. The criminal gang has compromised all of politics now and I am afraid to say that even if and when a new or third party does appear, with a platform to restore the American constitution and American freedoms, then that party will be relentlessly attacked by the media and every government and non-government authority – until it either capitulates or quietly joins in with the aims of the crime syndicate.

    I have seen this in Britain when a GENUINE non-mainstream party emerged to restore freedoms and re-institute normal patriotic leadership. The website is attacked and shut down; the party is relentlessly sued through the courts by ‘NGOs’ and government ‘quangos’ – and the leading individuals in the party are harassed by the police, meetings infiltrated by the ‘security services’ and officials jailed on trumped up charges. Yes – this is the same Britain that WAS the Mother of Parliamentary democracy and free speech – now fast becoming another gulag run by the SAME people enslaving America.

    On the laughable subject of UN resolutions – which are now being used to enforce the criminal cabal’s will on all nations – let me reproduce here a UN resolution that strangely does not seem to apply any more:

    “On December 10th 1948, the General Assembly of the United Nations adopted and proclaimed the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Following this historic act the Assembly called upon all Member countries to publicize the text of the Declaration and to cause it to be disseminated, displayed, read and expounded principally in schools and other educational institutions, without distinction based on the political status of countries or territories.”

    ARTICLE 19. EVERYONE has the right to freedom of opinions and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.

    It would now seem that ‘Some people are more equal than others’, to quote George Orwell’s ‘Animal Farm’.

    Ultimately this is what you must expect when you come up against a criminal cabal that has NO INTENTION of falling from power – either with or without any public support in the form of votes. We need to now look beyond the delusion that legal and decent democratic tactics will ever lever them from office.

  6. One thing that might help us on a foreign policy note would be for general officers to uphold their oath of office. The video here is a little dated but policies really haven’t changed but have gotten worse. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g_yHY9hFl94

    • Louis that link is brilliant – well done. The more officers are reminded of their oath the better. If officers and men are to be expected to obey DIFFERENT orders for a different ideology – then somebody had better explain to them WHAT EXACTLY that ideology is and what it stands for. Get that message out to the whole of the armed forces!

    • Louis, in Britain it was discovered by the British National Party (a non mainstream basic patriotic movement that is HATED by the media – and by the ‘slave’ parties that covertly enforce globalism and israeli interests) that every Member of Parliament had actually broken their Parliamentary oath. Some had broken it maliciously as deliberate spies and traitors – and others had done so without initially realising it. Promoting the corrupt European Union laws over British Law was in itself a criminal offence punishable with charges of High Treason and death. Neither the British people nor the Crown has given permission for this secretive act of infamy.

      The solemn oath that they have broken is here:

      “I do swear by Almighty God to be a true and faithful servant unto the Queen’s Majesty, as one of Her Majesty’s Privy Council. I will do my uttermost to bear Faith and Allegiance unto the Queen’s Majesty; and will assist and defend all Jurisdictions, Pre-eminences and Authorities, granted to Her Majesty – and annexed to the Crown by Acts of Parliament, or otherwise, against all Foreign Princes, Persons, Prelates, States or Potentates.”

      They all publicly signed this – but nonetheless are now busy handing the reigns of the nation over to the un-elected and un-accountable crime syndicate of the new world order. If any craven act of treason deserved a capital death sentence – selling your own country must be high on the list.

  7. Ron Paul or no one at all. I will write him in. Spare me the “it is a vote for Obama” nonsense. We know how to fight Obama. Romney will be another Bush so imagine what kind of goofball will be elected from the next backlash over a neocon president’s failure.

  8. Let us hope so? Talk about naive. I do not support and will not be voting for Obama but Romney has DOV ZAKHEIM and John Bolton on his foreign policy team. If you do not understand the significance of that I’m not surprised you might think a Romney regime would be better than an Obama regime. Oh, but Romney is “pro-business” right? LOL!

    • Isn’t Dov Zakheim the guy who “lost” a couple of trillion dollars at the Pentagon and set the stage for the 9/11/01 stand-down during the false flag attacks?

  9. Phyllis Schlafly is a fascist moron.

Comments are closed

 

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Join Our Daily Newsletter
  View Newsletter ARCHIVE

WHAT'S HOT

  1. Climate Change Is Here – The People March But Will They Act
  2. VT Science: Fuel Cell Technology
  3. Buddha and Scythians move in with VT
  4. Avnery – Scotland on the Euphrates River
  5. Ike’s Free Ride and Other Tales of Horror
  6. Bay Area Baseball Playoff Predictions
  7. The Connection Between Aurora and Black Triangles
  8. ECIPS Issues Extensive Security Border Alert for ISIS Infiltration
  9. Quantitative Easing and Qualitative Solution
  10. Gilad Atzmon’s Homage to Klezmer Nick Cooper
  11. United Kingdom is Staying United
  12. Sandy Hook: knowingly broadcasting hoax as real violates FCC Regulations
  13. Afghanistan’s Puppet Leaders
  14. Geopolitics of World War III
  15. Scotland: Referendum Rigging Caught in Secret Video
  16. Brief History of Talmud and Jewish People
  17. Scots Kiss Goodbye to Independence
  18. Operation United Assistance: The Ebola Pandemic
  19. Obama fails to portray Putin as ‘aggressor’ in Ukraine crisis
  20. Ex-US Officials Demanded a 30 Billion Dollar Bribe
  1. PeterAG: Hitler never understood that the british was the enemy. The british made him believe there were two different teams one anti & one pro-german where the abdikated Edward VIII was ...
  2. Bill Brady: Can you site some references that back your assertions?
  3. Bill Brady: What I wonder is if it travels slow and silently how do we know it is not a lighter than air ship dressed up to look like a triangle or ...
  4. Carnaptious: This article certainly has stirred up a lively and informative comment thread. Interesting to see how firmly some are wedded to the myths, and refuse to even contemplate the ...
  5. Bill Brady: You might read Unconventional Flying Objects by Paul Hill. He explains high G acceleration without being crushed. What he doesn't explain is what is the drive that is ...

Veterans Today Poll

For over 60 years, US Taxpayers have been funding Israel, Palestine and Middle East. Are you happy with return on investment or would you prefer those monies be invested at home instead?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Archives