By Jim Fetzer and Press TV
The choice [of Sandy Hook Elementary School] appears to be covertly revealing, where “Sandy” means guardian of men (as an allusion to guns) and “Hook” as a euphemism for hooking, gathering or confiscating [the only weapons that DHS fears].–John Kimber, beforeitsnews
When Press TV published my submission, they selected their own title, “Mossad death squads slaughtered American children at Sandy Hook”. I would have used, “Did Mossad ‘death squads’ slaughter American children at Sandy Hook?” No matter how provocative the title, however, there remains every reason to believe that what I wrote about Sandy Hook–and the pattern that this atrocity appears to reflect–is overwhelmingly closer to the truth than what we are being told by our own national press, which is displaying its profound prejudice against accuracy in media. Here, for example, is a story from The Wisconsin State Journal (Sunday, December 23, 2012), “Debate leads to culture clash”, which represents the bare bones of the “official account”:
Early last Friday, authorities say, Adam Lanza shot his mother repeatedly in the head with her .22 calibre rifle as she lay in bed. He then drove to the elementary school, shot his way in and fired dozens of rounds into two first-grade classes using her Bushmaster assault-type rifle. Some of the children were shot 11 times. He then shot and killed himself with one of her pistols.
But the story doesn’t bother to report that he was not known to have had any training in the use of handguns, much less assault rifles; that his body was found with two handguns lying beside it, while the Bushmaster was still in the car; and where the kind of accuracy in killing typified military experts, not that of young men of slight build who are most unlikely to have the marksmanship skills displayed in shooting 20 children and 6 adults. Or the fact that two other suspects were also identified, at least one of whom was apprehended–and possibly both (see below).
The circumstances are so blatant that I have been surprised by those who have been taken in. A friend who had read my piece wrote to tell me that he thought there were a lot of alternative explanations that made more sense than what I was suggesting. When I pointed out Adam probably only weighed around 120 lbs and would have had a hard time handling an assault rifle, he replied by observing that you can find photos of children handling assault rifles on the web, but where he discounts the difficulty in firing them with accuracy and in hitting many small and moving targets. That displays a high degree of competence and extensive training.
Wayne LaPierre, representing the National Rifle Association, has made several efforts to explain why limitations on weapons are not the answer and that having armed guards in schools would go a long way to discouraging events like this one. I watched his appearance on “Meet the Press” this morning, where the fly-weight anchor, David Gregory, appeared to be completely ignorant of the real issues. “If it’s crazy to call for armed officers in our schools to protect our children, then call me crazy,” LaPierre said defiantly. “I think the American people think it’s crazy not to do it. It’s the one thing that would keep people safe.”
DHS is the threat, not the NRA
Connecticut already has stringent gun control laws, where tightening restrictions on their sale would have made no difference in this case. It was his mother’s weapons, not his own, that were used here. And insofar as serious questions have been raised about Adam Lanza’s emotional and mental health, he (LaPierre) appropriately suggested that care should be taken to that persons with problems not be able to obtain them. Other sources have contested that this should be regarded as having a “mental health” aspect at all:
We’ve been told, by a former classmate, that he was “weird.” We’ve been told, by a family friend, that he played a lot of violent video games. And we’ve also been told by such sources that he had a “developmental disorder,” that some say was Asperger’s Syndrome.
From this, a narrative has emerged of a troubled young man, induced into violence by his preferred choice of media, and failed by an inadequate mental health system.
This narrative has caught on so successfully that, as of Wednesday, a Gallup poll found far more Americans believing that events like the Newtown tragedy could be avoided through increased federal spending on mental health screening and services than by banning the sale of assault weapons.
I find it reassuring that the American public may not be so easily deceived. There are many reasons for believing that Sandy Hook is only the latest in a pattern of orchestrated events intended to herd the sheeple into surrendering their 2nd amendment rights, where the real treat to our way of life is not assault weapons but the Department of Homeland Security, which, given the absence of evidence of a bona fide domestic terrorist threat, increasingly appears to be in the process of preparing for massive civil war with the American people:
(1) The US Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs (3 October 2012) has established that there is no domestic terrorist threat;
(2) There are 300 or more FEMA camps distributed around the country and we know that Congress has authorized 30,000 drones for domestic surveillance;
(3) Since there is no domestic terrorist threat, the domestic surveillance and those FEMA camps are not intended to survey terrorists or to imprison terrorists;
(4) Since those drones and FEMA camps are either intended to survey terrorists or US citizens, it follows that, since they are not for terrorists, they are for US citizens;
(5) DHS has acquired more than 1.5 billion rounds of .40 caliber hollow-point ammunition, which is not even permissible in warfare under the Geneva Conventions;
(6) Since DHS does not conduct operations abroad, it has been acquired for domestic consumption and, since there are no terrorists, it must be for US citizens;
(7) Congress is planning for funeral homes, cemeteries and mortuaries being “overwhelmed” from a mass terror attack, natural disaster or other crisis; but,
(8) there is no domestic terrorist threat and no conceiveable natural disaster would justify this dramatic authorization for coping with staggering numbers of bodies.
Nothing stands between DHS and complete domination of American than a population that is heavily armed and capable of resistance. Undermining our 2nd amendment rights by fabricated attacks–which can be arranged at will by those who control the cover operations of this nation–must be understood to be the real threat that we confront, not bizarre incidents like this one, which–even if we were to take it as the press has been reporting it–could not have been prevented by gun control.
At least some of my colleagues understand the threat. As Mike Sparks, who deals with the defense industry by evaluating equipment before it is purchased, has written,
Just as the Mossad and US Neo-Cons collaborated in the atrocities of 9/11 and the more recent events at Benghazi, Benjamin Netanyahu bears grudges and has been offended by the failure of the US to kowtow to its every whim, including its dedication to manipulating us to attack Iran, which has no justification. I think Texe Marrs has it right: Zionism is the gravest threat to world peace and to domestic tranquility, where there are signs that our own leaders are finally figuring it out.
CONCLUSION: DHS is planning for massive civil war, involving massive casualities, with the citizens of the USA. Consider the evidence. There’s no way around it. That’s what’s happening. Don’t be taken in!
The situation is very simple: When they come for our guns, the time will have come to use them!
“Mossad ‘death squads’ slaughtered American children at Sandy Hook”
By James H. Fetzer
- Thu Dec 20, 2012 7:27PM
The Sandy Hook massacre appears to have been a psy op intended to strike fear in the hearts of Americans by the sheer brutality of the massacre, where the killing of children is a signature of terror ops conducted by agents of Israel.
This is being used as powerful incentive for banning assault rifles, where most of the public is unaware of the fact that the Department of Homeland Security has acquired 1.5 billion rounds of .40 caliber, hollow-point ammunition, which is not even permissible in warfare under the Geneva Conventions.
A Senate Subcommittee has issued a report (3 October 2012) based upon its review of 680 “fusion center” reports (from 2009-2001) and found not a single indication of any domestic terrorist threat-not one! None! Since the only domestic “terrorist threats” are ones contrived by the government, especially the FBI, the public needs to know.
This information–as well as the existence of more than 300 FEMA camps and special boxcars to carry dissidents to them–has been deliberately withheld from the American people, because if they were aware of the facts of the matter, it would become obvious that those camps and ammunition are intended to be used against them.
When DHS is gearing up to conduct a massive civil war against the American people, what better excuse could there be for banning assault weapons than the massacre of 20 innocent children at Sandy Hook Elementary School?
The choice appears to be covertly revealing, where “Sandy” means guardian of men (as an allusion to guns) and “Hook” as a euphemism for hooking, gathering or confiscating the only weapons that DHS fears. And who better to slaughter American children than Israelis, who deliberately murder Palestinian children?
Mike Harris of Veterans Today has exposed the pattern relating what happened there to earlier assaults: “This is exactly what Israel did in Norway; the political party that voted sanctions against Israel was retaliated against by a ‘lone gunman’ who killed 77 children. This is what Israel always does, they go after the children.
“It is what they do in Gaza every day. It is what was done in Norway. It is what happened at Sandy Hook. Nobody buys the ‘one gunman’ story anymore, not with the Gabby Giffords’ shooting, not with the Aurora “Batman” shooting, certainly not with Breveik, and certainly not in Connecticut.”
The most likely scenario, given what we know now, is that Adam Lanza and his mother killed the day before. Adam’s body picked up by local police. He was attired in a SWAT outfit, including body armor, and stored in the school.
A three-man team entered the school, one was arrested in the school–cuffed and put on the lawn–two went out the back door, one was arrested, the third appears to have escaped. You can find this on helicopter videos.
Those arrested are currently not in police custody; their names were never released. That is a telling sign that we are being sold a story that is based on fiction, not on fact. What else are the local police concealing?
A parallel situation in Aurora, where there appear to have been multiple participants, but the police concealed information about them. The DC Sniper, John Allen Muhammad, was even a active member of Delta Force, but the public was not informed.
His assistant in this killing spree, Lee Boyd Malvo, had been detained in Seattle but was released, even though he was an illegal alien, where INS has refused to explain how that happened. Did “higher authority” intervene?
Nidal Malik Hasan, the US Army Major who killed 13 and wounded 29 during a rampage at Ft. Hood, Texas, even sat next to the Director of Homeland Security during an event at George Washington University. Can that be coincidental?
When the “long gunman” cover story falls apart, then the national press, which William Colby told us was infiltrated by agents of the CIA–“The agency owns everyone of significance in the major media”–resorts to stories of Mind Control and use of drugs.
We have to see through the smoke and mirrors. These attacks typically involve three-man shooting teams, where, once the story is tainted with bogus MK/Ultra conspiracy disinformation, crucial data, like the assault rifle the Sandy Hook having been left in his car, swiftly disappears.
Lenin and Trotsky were terrorists. Lenin was an outspoken proponent of terrorism. The founder of the Lukid Party and sixth Prime Minister of Israel was an Irgun terrorist. Study its history. No nation in the world cares more about its own interests and less about those of the United State than Israel.
The bombing of the King David Hotel in Jerusalem on 22 July 1946, was a stunning example. The attack on the USS Liberty and Israel’s bombing of its own Embassy and Jewish Community Center in Buenos Aires in 1992 and 1994 are other illustration.
Those who study 9/11 are all too aware of the role of the Neo-Cons and the Mossad. But the American press covers it up-and Congress is controlled by AIPAC. As Bill Casey, former CIA Director, observed, “Our disinformation program will be complete when everything the American public believes is false.” Sandy Hook is the latest example.
McKnight Professor Emeritus at the University of Minnesota Duluth, he has also conducted extensive research into the assassination of JFK, the events of 9/11, and the plane crash that killed Sen. Paul Wellstone.
The founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, his latest books include The Evolution of Intelligence (2005), The 9/11 Conspiracy (2007), Render Unto Darwin (2007), and The Place of Probability in Science (2010).
Latest posts by Jim Fetzer (see all)
- Why Ringo’s Confession, “We replaced Paul”, appears to be authentic - March 29, 2015
- Boston Show Trial: Even marathon footage of suspects was faked - March 28, 2015
- Boston Show Trial: The Opinion of an Attorney at Law - March 24, 2015
Posted by Jim Fetzer on December 23, 2012, With 0 Reads, Filed under Of Interest. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.