.

Sandy Hook: Analogies with the London 7/7 Bombings


By Nick Kollerstrom (with Jim Fetzer)

“No-one has been able to get into the Sandy Hook elementary school to verify if there are any bullet-marks, bloodstains etc, then on January 2nd, the children were transferred to another school some miles away: we assume the old Sandy Hook Elementary School will remain sealed off, and will be demolished. Perhaps a shootout DID NOT ACTUALLY HAPPEN THERE, it was just an illusion.”–Nicholas Kollerstrom

Nicholas Kollerstrom is an historian of science who has taken great risks and suffered real harms by his willingness to conduct scientific research on the Holocaust. He has also done brilliant work on 9/11. The points that he makes here are rather chilling, including that the Batman film ‘Dark Knight Rises’ alluded to Sandy Hook region of Gotham City, as a portion of the city of Gotham during a setup of one of the bad guy’s dirty deeds in that movie.  Earlier promotions of the film the year before did not (Alex Jones discovered) have that Sandy Hook reference.  The 2000 film ‘The Sandy Hook Lingerie Party Massacre’ has the killer strike in the aftermath of a hurricane.’ And the ritual sacrifice of 22 children is portrayed in ‘The Hunger Games’ by Suzanne Collins: she lives in Sandy Hook. As he observes, “Perhaps a shootout DID NOT ACTUALLY HAPPEN THERE, it was just an illusion.”

Sandy Hook: Analogies with the London 7/7 Bombings

 

by Nicholas Kollerstrom

 

The Predator has struck, one more time. We seek for its identity, what is it? I here compare two different events, perpetrated by the Enemies of Mankind, seven years apart.  Maybe first read my earlier post. 

1.   Scene of crime remains concealed: no media access

No-one has been able to get into the Sandy Hook elementary school to verify if there are any bullet-marks, bloodstains etc, then on January 2nd  the children were transferred to another school some miles away: we assume the old Sandy Hook Elementary School will remain sealed off, and will be demolished. Perhaps a shootout DID NOT ACTUALLY HAPPEN THERE, it was just an illusion. Kids heard bangs, that’s all we can say.  The new school will be patrolled by security guards permanently: presumably to maintain the kids in a state of sufficient trauma to prevent them talking, or remembering the wrong sort of thing.

No bodies, only some duffle bags (Daily Mail)

The Mail Online 6 January shows this image, subtitled: ‘Chaotic scenes at the school as police work to secure the area and bodies are carried out of the school.’ But look carefully, no bodies are here, only some duffle bags – and some are doubting whether this is the school car-park.

In the London Bombings, the three train carriages were kept absolutely out or bounds then destroyed one year later: the blown-up bus was taken up to Sevenoaks Military establishment, i.e only the military can see it.

2.   CCTV switched off

The Sandy Hook Elementary School was in an up-market area of Connecticut, shown by the large majority of its children being from Jewish families. It would have had high-security equipment including CCTV cameras. We have as yet not been shown images from the time of the crime (curiously vague, but said to have been three minutes around 9.45 on 14th December). There are no images of a ‘crime scene’ eg bullet-marks in walls or through windows. No wounded persons being interviewed.

During the London Bombings, as also for 9/11, the CCTV was switched off: no pictures, from the most heavily CCTV’d city in the world (until 3 years later when some rather dodgy ones were released).

3.    The patsy perpetrator(s), clueless and unmotivated, are themselves killed so they cannot defend themselves. Dead, then can be given all the blame.

There is no reason to suppose that the 20-year old autistic Adam Lanza had any expertise or practice in using guns, still less that his Mother went herself to a firing range or belonged to a rifle club and brought her son along. The car allegedly driven by him to the school turned out to belong to a shady felon, with FBI ties. Would or could any young man shoot his mother, take her car, drive it to a school to which he does not belong, be dressed in black, shoot his way into the school with several guns and kill virtually every target he aims at? How could anyone believe such a story? Then he kills himself – and then, goes over to his car and puts the rifle he has used back in the book. There is no conceivable motive for this physically quite impossible sequence of events.

The four alleged London bombers knew nothing about chemistry, never had any interest in it, and had no bomb-making skills that anyone ever heard about. Once dead they had no-one to defend their name against the official fictions. Not one of them had an animus against British society, to motivate any antisocial act.

4.   An ever-changing story

If a story is being made up, then different agencies will be spinning it, so it will never be very coherent. The Sandy Hook story became incoherent at the moment when CNN News announced that four pistols had been found in the school: presumably because the official coroner had averred that each of the 28 bodies had an average of seven bullet-holes in them, so they needed four pistols to credibly sound as if two hundred bullets had been fired. One young lad is not going tobreak into the school with four guns – after shooting his own Mother. .

The story of the rifle used – the Coroner averred that all injuries had been made with the rifle, then it was found to have been placed in the back of a car outside the school – can never make any sense.

First we were told she was a teacher at the school, and Adam went to that school, then later it emerged: A former school board official in Newtown called into question earlier reports that Nancy Lanza had been connected to Sandy Hook Elementary School, possibly as part of the teaching staff. “No one has heard of her,” said Lillian Bittman, who served on the local school board until 2011. “Teachers don’t know her.”

The 7/7 London bombings was truly an ever-changing story, with a narrative that relied heavily upon journalistic amnesia and credulity over the latest bit of unattributed gossip. Notably over what explosive had been used, which kept changing. The State lies to its own people. The State participates in killing its own people.

5. Terror-Drills being run

On 17th September 2010, HSEEP Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program had a drill with FEMA at the Sandy Hook Fire Department, which is near to the Elementary School. On the day of the event, starting at 9.00 am, a FEMA exercise ‘Planning for the Needs of Children in Disasters’ took place in Connecticut not far from Sandy Hook. Some conjecture that this got moved and happened at the school, which would account for the presence of Federal troops there seemingly much too early. There is probably a lot more of this to come out. There is a picture on the Web of children of Sandy Hook forming a chain and being told to close their eyes – that is what a kiddie terror-drill looks like – from a couple of months earlier.

 

“Sandy Hook has a recent history of federally staged Terror Drills. A mock school shooting drill was being conducted in Putman County only miles away on the very same day as the Sandy Hook events on December 14.”

The London Bombings had four main terror-drills leading up to it, the last of these by Peter Power on the very morning at the same three tube stations.

6. Guilty culprits announced too soon.

At 9:53AM, no more than ten minutes after the reported shooting ceased, the Associated Press published a story, “Official with Knowledge of Connecticut School Shooting Says 27 Dead, Including 18 Children.” Neighbours of Nancy Lanza said that around 9:15am they saw police surrounding the house, taping off the neighborhood and telling everyone to evacuate.  Yet, they supposedly did not learn the identity of the shooter until c. 11:30am.  They identified the bodies of the “shooter” and his mother before the body identifying process even started, with names, occupations, “health issues”, marital status and residency.

On 9/11, news items started alluding to Osama Bin Laden about an hour after the event. On 7/7 Tony Blair announced that it was an Islamic crime at 5 pm on that day. The total of 52 dead was announced much too early, in fact while two of them ‘not yet dead’ were still in hospital.

7. Film pre-announcement of the event.

The Batman film ‘Dark Knight rises’ alluded to Sandy Hook region of Gotham City, as a portion of the city of Gotham during a setup of one of the bad guy’s dirty deeds in that movie.  Earlier promotions of the film the year before did not (Alex Jones discovered) have that Sandy Hook reference.  The 2000 film ‘The Sandy Hook Lingerie Party Massacre’ has the killer strike in the aftermath of a hurricane.’

Or, the ritual sacrifice of 22 children is portrayed in ‘The Hunger Games’ by  Suzanne Collins: she lives in Sandy Hook.

The London bombings were prefigured in the film ‘V for Vendetta’ about an Underground train primed to blow up. It was filmed in the months leading up to 7/7, so Warner Brothers had free run of the London Undergound tunnels. Its launch had to be postponed because it was too similar to what had just happened. Likewise ‘the Descent’ a horror movie scheduled to open the day after on 8th July, about people trapped underground and dying: its launch had to be postponed. Compare the classic film ‘The Matrix,’ where after 17 mins one sees 11 Sept 2001 on Anderson’s passport ID. 

8. Families not allowed to see bodies of loved ones.

At least one family had the experience of not even being allowed to see the body of their loved one. “They told me, ‘You can’t see (the body),’” Gilles Rousseau told Radio-Canada, the French-language CBC. “  They would just be shown photographs. ‘Where are the Sandy Hook Bodies? Many are wondering, are there any bodies?

There was a bizarre aspect to the 7/7 tragedy, in the way families had to wait often over a week just to be told whether their loved one was dead, and then would be not allowed to see the body – with phoney tales that it might upset them too much – or else shown them embalmed with a policeman standing by.

9. Families not allowed to speak

On December 19 the Connecticut State Police assigned individual personnel to each of the 26 families who lost a loved one at Sandy Hook Elementary. “The families have requested no press interviews,” State Police assert on their behalf, “and we are asking that this request be honoured – a de facto gag order. What is it so terrible they might say?

In the 7/7 London bombings, ‘grieving parents’ would always be wheeled out to support the government narrative, but one could never get to speak to any of them.


YouTube - Veterans Today -

10. Identity Theft

Adam Lanza was a vegan because he ‘didn’t want to hurt animals’. Nancy Lanza ‘was a wonderful, beautiful, elegant woman who loved life, and most importantly she loved her son, Adam’ a friend has testified. They lived on a street named after the great Indian Yogi ParamanshaYoganada: what did this mean to them?

The Mother has been hyped as an Apocalypse-expecting gun-toting food-storing freak (as a prelude to demonising gun-owners in America, the whole point of this exercise)

Sid Khan especially of the 7/7 Four was a rising star of Beeston, and after his death he became the most thoroughly demonised of the Four. Seemingly endless terror-tales were woven around him. SidKhab was especially proud of his reputation for non-violent conflict-resolution (see my online talk, about MSK as a ‘local action hero’) Wherever false-flag terror is perpetrated, it is important to try and rescue the identity of the person who gets blamed and demonised (eg for the Bali Bomb of 2002, someone called Amrotzi, who was a quite sensitive and intelligent young man).

11. Actors used

At least one ‘grieving parent’ at Sandy Hook looks as if he was acting a part. People are suspecting work by ‘Crisis Actors.org’: ”Trained players and actors making it real,’ available for ‘active shooter drills.’ They bring ‘intense realism to simulated mass casualty incidents.’

The London bombings had some actors spotted on the street that morning, presumably part of the ‘terror drill’ scheduled for that morning http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cW089fj94vY ‘Wounded’ actors were especially noticed around Tavistock Square.

12. Deaths not real

‘Even more unusual are the observations of Facebook pages of the deceased being created days or even months prior to the shooting, further suggesting the synthetic and premeditated nature of the event. For example, on March 23, 2011 a Facebook site was established, titled “RIP Emilie Parker,” for the daughter of Robbie Parker, now well-known after the soliloquy delivered on CNN and preceded by a gleeful chuckle and query as to whether he should read the lines provided him.’ One may doubt whether any of the 28 ‘deaths’ at Sandy Hook Elementary School were real.

The London bombings had one definite not-real-death,viz Myriam Hyman (but there may have been others). She’s on the plaque at Tavistock Square but no way did she die there.

THE BIG DIFFERENCE

Normally when fabricated terror happens, the story is fake but the deaths are real. It is the dead bodies which give the air of gravity and solemnity, so that Those Who Create Delusion will be believed. The London bombings had dreadful scenes of carnage, seen by real witnesses.

Sandy Hook has only two dead bodies known: Adam and Nancy Lanza. On that morning, the local hospital went into lockdown and cleared four trauma rooms, but received only three patients, two of them dead children(according to the official story) and one mildly wounded adult.We saw locked-down kiddie-coffins in funeral services, but is that enough? The situation may remind us of 9/11, when airports that morning were waiting for the grieving relatives – but none came. The security forces averred that they had removed the bodies from the school in the middle of the night: had they?

Have children been stolen? Child slaves sell, we are told, for well over $200,000.  

Nicholas Kollerstrom, Ph.D., historian of science, including articles on Sir Isaac Newton, Fellow of the Royal Astronomical Society, is a founding member of the UK’s 9/11 Truth movement, member of the New York Academy of Sciences, and author of 7/7: TERROR ON THE TUBE (3rd edition, 2012)

 

Jim Fetzer

A former Marine Corps officer, Jim Fetzer has published widely on the theoretical foundations of scientific knowledge, computer science, artificial intelligence, cognitive science, and evolution and mentality.

McKnight Professor Emeritus at the University of Minnesota Duluth, he has also conducted extensive research into the assassination of JFK, the events of 9/11, and the plane crash that killed Sen. Paul Wellstone.

The founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, his latest books include The Evolution of Intelligence (2005), The 9/11 Conspiracy (2007), Render Unto Darwin (2007), and The Place of Probability in Science (2010).

Related Posts:

The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT or any other VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors or partners and technicians. Notices

Posted by on 8:18 am, With 0 Reads, Filed under Of Interest, WarZone. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Comments Closed

99 Responses to "Sandy Hook: Analogies with the London 7/7 Bombings"

  1. Amanda  January 14, 2013 at 8:04 am

    Where is Sandy Hook school’s surveillance video?

    http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2013/01/08/where-is-sandy-hook-schools-surveilliance-video/

    There’s one way to resolve questions about whether Adam Lanza was the lone gunman (or even a gunman at all) who murdered 20 children and 6 adults at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Ct.

    Did you know that the school had a security surveillance system?

    Indeed, WTNH Channel 8 reports, Dec. 14, 2012, that the school had sent a letter to parents on the installation of a new security and surveillance system at the beginning of the 2012-2013 school year. Here’s the letter:

    Dear Members of our Sandy Hook Family,

    Our district will be implementing a security system in all elementary schools as part of our ongoing efforts to ensure student safety. As usual, exterior doors will be locked during the day. Every visitor will be required to ring the doorbell at the front entrance and the office staff will use a visual monitoring system to allow entry. Visitors will still be required to report directly to the office and sign in. If our office staff does not recognize you, you will be required to show identification with a picture id. Please understand that with nearly 700 students and over 1000 parents representing 500 SHS families, most parents will be asked to show identification.

    Doors will be locked at approximately 9:30 a.m. Any student arriving after that time must be walked into the building and signed in at the office. Before that time our regular drop-off procedures will be in place. I encourage all parents to have their children come to school and return home on the bus and to remain in school for the entire school day. The beginning and ending of our school day are also important instructional times and therefore we want all our students to reap the benefits of full participation in our program.

    We need your help and cooperation for our system to work effectively. Our office staff is handling multiple tasks. Though they will work diligently to help you into the building as quickly as possible, there may be a short delay until someone can view you on the handset and allow you to come in electronically. There are times during the day when office personnel are on the telephone, addressing student concerns, or in the copy room; there are other times when only one person is in the front office. Please help our staff by identifying yourself and provide your child’s name. Keep in mind we will be following our district guidelines which may need revision once we test the system.

    Please know your involvement continues to be critical to our school’s effectiveness and your child’s success. We continue to encourage and value your presence in our classrooms and are counting on your cooperation with the implementation of this safety initiative.

    Sincerely,
    Mrs. Hochsprung
    ……………

    We are told that sometime before 9:30 a.m. EST on December 14, 2012, 20-year-old Adam Lanza fatally shot his mother, Nancy Lanza, age 52, with a .22 Marlin rifle at their Newtown home. Adam Lanza then drove his mother’s car to Sandy Hook Elementary School.

    At about 9:35 a.m., using his mother’s Bushmaster XM-15, Lanza shot his way through a locked glass door at the front of the school. Connecticut governor Dannel Malloy disclosed that Lanza had broken into the school by firing a volley of bullets through a secured door. After killing 26, Lanza then killed himself when he heard police arriving.

    A commenter on the American Everyman blog, Scott Groves, writes:

    “I’ve been asking this question for the last few days. I’ve asked 2 reporters on twitter about it last night and both refused to look into the video from the school. After they refused to be journalists, they blocked me.”

    So where’s the school’s surveillance video showing Lanza — and Lanza alone — breaking through the secured door?

    If I were the parent of one of the 20 child victims, I would demand to see that video.

    ~Eowyn

    • LC  January 19, 2013 at 8:08 pm

      TOp proof link above. & see proof by google as I posted on other VT pages yesterday:

      Now in below links same proof is more visible:

      GOOGLE-PROOF that Sandy Hook was an inside job (& probably nobody was shot at school):
      This screen-shot clearly shows Google recorded the official Sandy Hook Relief Fund site as having been “indexed” three days before the shooting on Dec. 11, 2012

      First link below says “SANDY HOOK SCHOOL SUPPORT FUND-…” & was un-fake-ably date-stamped 12/11/2012:

      *****************http://worldtruth.tv/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/0bd06031a926ffe905450cef8c998bc8-11.png

      Taken from:

      *************http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2013/01/proof-that-sandy-hook-shooting-was-an-inside-job-2534860.html

      ++++other related links a @ **************http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/01/17/sandy-hook-scenario-and-meaning/

  2. Amanda  January 13, 2013 at 11:17 am

    Okay, I’m not too familiar w/this From the Trenches Radio show (I think he used to be RBN and grizzom used to post his show), but I found the Dec 14th episode posted on Dr. K’s site. It’s on some sort of UStream video and I don’t know how to bring it over here, so people are just going to have to go to Dr. K’s site here:

    http://nodisinfo.com/Home/2013/01/10/the-word-from-the-trenches-december-14-2012/

    Anyway, it’s actually very interesting and worth a listen, especially from 39-45 minutes when a woman named “Kathy” calls in and claims to be from Sandy Hook (I have no way of proving it, so people are just going to have to judge for themselves–it would be great if someone could email this From the Trenches guy and have him recommend TIU on his site and suggest that this caller, Kathy, visit TIU and fill us in on what she found out)

    Okay, this is basically what she had to say:

    She woke up early to lots of sirens, so she turned on her scanner (I guess this is that thing people use to listen to the police radio?) and was listening all morning. Kathy said thing seemed to move slowly, like maybe not much was going on, almost like maybe someone shot themselves in the foot. Then all of the sudden it’s announced by AP that 20 people are dead. She said that she didn’t hear anything on the scanner to suggest that, that she thought someone would have sounded excited or something like that on the radio. She said “It makes no sense and I’m here.” She said she hadn’t seen any photos of anyone hurt (I guess she also had the television on?) Kathy said there were lots of “weirdos driving around town in dark cars.” Also mentioned that there were supposedly three people who were taken to the hospital, but nobody saw anyone putting anyone on stretchers and into ambulances. She’s about 2 miles away from the school, says it’s like a circus around there, “bizarre, very bizarre.” Kathy also said they shut down the post office b/c of this and that when she was driving around town, she saw lots of dark colored vehicles w/lots of antenna (someone called in and suggested these were DHS vehicles?) She said there were lots of “intense looking, scary guys, not suit and tie kind of guys, more like military guys.” Then she said something like “there’s an operation going on here, I just don’t know how real it is.” Kathy also said something about wanting “to go into town and see that these people really existed.” She also mentioned that there had been lots of weirdness around the Aurora/Batman shooting as well. Then she went back to talking about the scanner and how the whole thing seemed very strange b/c what she was hearing was very subdued. She said that early on it almost seemed comical b/c they were talking about looking for a maroon van with two guys, with one of them dressed in a nun outfit (!?!). Kathy said it almost seemed like a joke for awhile and then things suddenly shifted w/AP announcing dozens dead and that “was just bizarre.”

  3. Amanda  January 13, 2013 at 11:15 am

    I honestly don’t know anything about gun/permits, but this seems to suggest that gun permits are public record and that there are no records of the guns we were told that Nancy Lanza owned??

    No Gun Permit Under Nancy Lanza’s Name In Public Records, Says TIME Magazine
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i2CJVaYHqBw

    video description:

    Published on Jan 11, 2013
    So gun permit records are public knowledge, and major news outlets are unable to find any for Nancy Lanza. Not even for the AR-15 rifle? The police are saying that those guns were registered to her and she had permits for them, but apparently the public records themselves are not supporting their theories.

  4. Amanda  January 13, 2013 at 11:14 am

    On her show yesterday, Carolyn Yeager did an excellent questioning the info we’ve been given about Sandy Hook:

    http://grizzom.blogspot.nl/2013/01/saturday-afternoon-with-carolyn-yeager_12.html

    Show description: Sandy Hook, Part 2
    We are told that the lesson to be drawn from the Sandy Hook “massacre” is that easy access to assault-type weapons creates a public danger of untold proportions. We need to understand that the real danger is from our public media, which is the ultimate WMD, or weapon of mass destruction, for our people. The media has given us an “official narrative” of Sandy Hook which on even semi-close inspection cannot be believed. Thus it comes under the category of an operation to “change our perception of reality” in order to make us more pliable to the wishes of our governments. (In other words, a psychological operation or psyop.)
    Carolyn discusses the reports and rumors about Sandy Hook from this point of view and points to the danger within the “alternative media” and/or “truth movement” of getting bogged down in debate over details of little consequence, as has happened in the 9/11 Truth Movement and also in “The Holocaust,” for that matter. Mentioned on the program: Fla. Atlantic Univ. Professor James Tracy interviewed on Guns and Butter.

  5. Garibaldi  January 11, 2013 at 10:22 am

    Tony Ryals? username wolfblitzzer0. Writes profusely on stock fraud, gov. fraud. Google- tony ryals wolfblitzzer0 – see what you get. You mention Duff. Found him on this rather intriguing page, with extras- http://wolfblitzzer0.blogspot.com/2011/08/logan-airport-boston911menachem.html
    Bonus question: Wasn’t that the real-life Wolf Blitzer who interviewed Lt. Paul Vance?
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K1JBnpR6xAI (go to 4:45)
    If it was, then Houston…

  6. Raptor  January 10, 2013 at 7:18 pm

    Anyone know who this blogger/op really is? Has a thing for Mr Duff which I find most interesting indeed. WTF are these people anyway?

    http://wolfblitzzer0.blogspot.com/2012/12/sandy-hooknewtownchris-manfredonia.html

    Someone is getting played….but these seem to be some well connected, high stakes kind of games..Disagree on many things yet agree right down to the ground on others. Maybe a flavor of the month club….who knows….Maybe the AR was full auto and thus the rug later to be pulled from under those asking such silly questions… Unreal..

    Raptor

  7. Amanda  January 10, 2013 at 11:04 am

    Looks like people are going after Professor Tracy for speaking up:

    Newtown official calls for FAU professor’s firing

    http://weblogs.sun-sentinel.com/news/columnists/mayo/blog/2013/01/newtown_official_calls_fau_pro.html

    By Michael Mayo January 9, 2013 08:32 AM

    I’m all for academic freedom and freedom of speech, but there’s a not-so-fine line between critical thinking and crackpot lunacy.

    Florida Atlantic University professor James Tracy has clearly stepped over it.

    Tracy’s doubts about the Sandy Hook Elementary massacre, and his blog assertions that the events may have been staged or part of a larger conspiracy to bring sweeping gun control to America, aren’t playing so well in Newtown, Conn, site of the tragedy.

    FoxNews.com reports that Newtown first selectwoman E. Patricia Llodra has called for Tracy’s firing, calling the tenured communication professor “an embarrassment” and “insensitive.”

    From the FoxNews report:

    “Shame on you, too, FAU, to even have someone like this on your payroll,” Llodra, herself a former teacher and school administrator, told FoxNews.com in an email. “Professor Tracy is an embarrassment to me as an educator and should be to you as well. I can assure you, sadly, that the events here in Newtown unfolded exactly as are being reported, with the horrible outcome of the violent death of 26 innocent people, including 20 children.
    “It is outrageous and an insult to all caring people to think that this man would chose this event as a stage for his outlandish conspiracy theories,” she added, calling his statements “wrong, inconsiderate and insensitive.”

    Tracy’s blog comments began circulating among Internet conspiracy theorists in the past week, and my colleague Mike Clary wrote a story about him on Monday.

    To me, it would be well within the bounds of reason for a communication professor to criticize and analyze the media’s coverage of the massacre. There was plenty of misinformation reported in the early hours. And media critics could make a case that the aftermath has spawned slanted coverage that favors a policy outcome (stricter gun control).

    But some of Tracy’s posts and a timeline on his blog (I’m not going to give him publicity by linking to it), are merely lazy — not critical — thinking. To Tracy, the misinformation in the early hours is not misinformation, but true nuggets that blend together to produce a noxious stew of conspiracy.

    Multiple shooters! Charity websites that started collections before the shooting! (Uh, maybe the timestamps on those webpages were wrong or manipulated). And Tracy harps on the lack of video surveillance images and other photographic evidence. Just because those things haven’t been released yet doesn’t mean they don’t exist.

    Again, I’m all for critical thinking and challenging conventional wisdom (ie, the world is flat, the sun revolves around the earth), but Tracy’s “studies” and conclusions are insensitive and offensive.

    Here’s the best thing we can do: Ignore him. And FAU students would be wise to pass up his classes. There’s nothing an attention monger hates worse than an empty room and the sound of crickets.

    …………

    Again, it’s worth listening to Professor Tracy on Guns and Butter archived here:
    http://www.kpfa.org/archive/id/87874

    Guns and Butter
    “Sandy Hook: Unanswered Questions” with Professor James F. Tracy. Discrepancies in media coverage; coroner’s press conference; political fallout.

  8. Raptor  January 10, 2013 at 8:42 am

    The choice is a bit obvious as mentioned by Yoichi.

    It seems as if James Tracy has set off a firestorm of sorts, getting lots of play, lots of obvious troll attacks. I read where a woman came forward and offered up a general ( inside the professional ranks ) feeling about the Sandy Hook thing.. interesting the points that she touches upon. She posted to his page as did some claiming to be from Newtown and also claiming to know some of the dead and families personally.

    I don’t think this thing was as sophisticated as some would have people believe. What will never be explained is how the authorities were able to know so much so quickly. If they are that good then they’d never need 3 plus months to finalize such an event and produce a final report.

    Another thing people take for granted is the time elapsed….many people think 5 minutes is more like 10 minutes, especially during severe duress. The shooters may have only been active for 5 minutes time or even less… Kind of like Earthquakes when people interviewed say that it shook for a minute when reality was around 30 seconds…….

    Real shooters long long gone leaving behind a dead patsy and those as a diversion running off into the woods. Like someone else mentioned, probably in a bar, cozy, blowing smoke and knocking back shots.

    Raptor

    • Garibaldi  January 10, 2013 at 8:58 am

      Shooters? Dead patsy? Show me one drop of blood on a single solitary stiff, Rap. That’s all I’m asking, or I’m outa here.

    • Raptor  January 10, 2013 at 7:04 pm

      Well Like I said it’s one of two things. Who is now in control of that information? Surely these folks are not that stoopid…. But anyway Tracy is getting out in the open death threats in the message section of his page, along with posts from people claiming to know people killed, kids, teachers, ETC….Only they come across as complete idiots or easy to spot paid trolls…. To me………….this is getting extremely creepy in a very very strange sort of way..

      Maybe it’s an east coast thing, just a vibe I’m getting from the visual aspect of this case…flat out creepy…in a Pedo sort of way……easy and severe blackmail ticket down the old dirt road….if you know what I mean.

      Are people really this disconnected? I mean seriously… all of these people seem to somehow be connected in some odd way, akin to a club, ring, or something I’ve never seen…..very freaking creepy.

      I’ve found paid reporters who are posting articles in an attempt to diffuse the obvious bungled mass of shit laid down by local authorities….Are they really this stoopid….this ignorant of the actual intelligence that exists in this cyber world? Their actions seem to say yes…

      One scribe said all the initial BS has since been corrected…That is a balled faced lie, period….You see one can’t have this both ways……either this is a close knit community where everyone knows everyone, or it’s not….You can’t say ” oh well her, or them ” they don’t count….that’s utter bullshit… Yeah nobody really knew much about them………….it’s as if they’re protecting themselves or someone they know, almost by proxy……Very f,ing creepy.

      This is far deeper than anyone is willing to admit on record. I think that has much to do with the silence being laid down by local LE..

      Seems to be an awful lot of organized crime in the immediate area…….could this be why E Patricia Llodra made the asinine statement about what actually happened at Sandy Hook..?

      I read an account where she had said that the event happened just like THEY said it did!!! Mike Clary ( if I’m not mistaken, may be ) of the Sun Sentinel penned it…

      The comments in regard to that article are priceless…. Just like one big happy family….amazing.

      Raptor

    • Garibaldi  January 10, 2013 at 8:00 pm

      “Who is now in control of that information?”
      Your question reminded me of some remarks at Tracy’s blog by Dr. K (Khaleel), (who also posted to this article in the network comments above) which I deemed worthy of a response, so here ya go-
      http://memoryholeblog.com/2013/01/01/sandy-hook-the-illusion-of-tragedy/#comment-1392

  9. Garibaldi  January 10, 2013 at 7:53 am

    I also ran across Shimatsu’s Part 2 some while back, being yet unaware of Part 1. Yoichi is all over the map on this, but amidst all his MK-Ultra projections and Mafiosian conjectures, one glaring entity at the veritable TOP of the gun-control pyramid emerges as the Capo di Tutti Capi of them all, and most obvious suspect as main facilitator of this entire op, so his puzzle pieces are invaluable for that reason alone, IMHO. I’ll give you ONE guess who that might be.

  10. Raptor  January 10, 2013 at 3:51 am

    Been reading many many articles on this shooting, dozens would be an understatement. One in particular sticks out, it was written by ” Yoichi Shimatsu ” Not long after the event, a week or so, a very well written 2 part piece. Of all that I’ve read and, I mean no offense to any of the other authors, his stands alone and I would strongly urge anyone even remotely interested in learning about some of the things you’re dealing with, to read it through more than once.

    The only pause it gives me is it’s detail. How can it be that Yoichi knows so very much of these things while the rest of us remain completely ignorant of their existence? It’s as if this guy is an absolute walking authority on the state of CT.

    There are far too many people writing about this event for some of the stuff NOT TO STICK to the wall on which it’s being thrown. So where are all of those involved in the event, those most affected, and those tasked with solving the mystery? Why nothing of note from them? No response, no outrage, no threats, no phone calls, no letters, no e-mails, NOTHING except or ( accept ) the crickets which has become all to familiar a sound where these staged events are concerned. Personally I find this glaring, in your face, and as arrogant as it gets.

    Every board save a very few, have been infected with CIA ops who control or steer thoughts or conversation in a desired direction. They are easy to spot for those of us who’ve been doing this for a long time. Many many people searching for answers simply wind up chasing their tails or worse, believing and thinking the impossible. This is their main goal and it’s being done is mass in regard to this shooting.

    People are touching on the keys, only not following up. Suggesting the obvious then either leaving it lay, or changing the topic all together. I can point out several, but the few key points of the event should be the focus of any and all who have questions.

    Like the car, the tag, registration ETC.
    Like the weight of the gear Adam was said to have packed into the school.
    Like the kill to wound ratio.
    Like how he got to the school.
    Like the one no one has yet to mention except for ” Mike Powers ” Why would a responsible gun owner, at first said to be a crazy prepper, ( ever )TEACH HER BAT SHIT CRAZY SON TO USE ANY WEAPON LET ALONE A SEMI AUTO AR PLATFORM RIFLE????????????????

    You see it can only be that those who draft these sorts of things rely on the ignorance of the general public as a whole when the state this obvious bullshit. They even made a video clip ala INTERVIEW with someone who claimed to have known the Mother in an effort to COVER his shooting ability. COME ON….THINK ABOUT THIS.

    The guy said that…..The Mother was concerned about Adam’s weakness and wanted him to be able to protect himself if necessary………….SO why warn people to ” NOT TURN THEIR BACKS ON ADAM EVER?”

    If anyone follows this and comes away with anything less than full out rage I pity you. You’re simply being force fed lie after lie, gag after gag. and movie after movie. If this isn’t a watershed, or breaking point then I’m not sure what is.

    In the end you’re left with two distinct camps:
    1) all staged no one shot, just a drill.
    2) Professional job.

    In my opinion this is why none of the inconsistencies involved with camp 1 are ever going to be rectified or explained by any LE AUTHORITY ever. To do so would cast a great deal of light on camp 2 and wreck the official narrative completely. So they put it off, and then put it off some more until some other news event takes it’s place.

    One has to ask where are those adults that were shot and killed. What do those in camp 1 have to say in that regard?

    Yoichi Shimatsu:
    http://rense.com/general95/mkultra.html
    http://rense.com/general95/howz.html

    Raptor

  11. Chandler  January 9, 2013 at 8:44 pm

    Looking at pictures of Adam Lanza, I find it difficult to accept he could even withstand the recoil of an assault weapon, or whatever weapon he supposedly fired. He is small, weak, and too intimidating in appearance the deed he is accused of.
    He is the Oswald of this shooting scene, who is nothing but a patsy. It is obvious, far too obvious. I have no authority to do much if anything, but I am sure someone somewhere has authority, and should step in.
    Iit is un imaginable any parent would not want to see their child prior to burial, let alone an entire group of people. If someone told me I could not speak to one of the other family members, I would make a spectacle of myself and make continued attempts to do so.
    I find this all a little too clumsily done, too connected to Aurora, and too confined to be convincingly
    believable.
    My country is being torn asunder by our own leadership. The real terror is right here at home. It is foolhardy to think the best way to protect everyone is to disarm them. We are being set up for a huge assault by the people we elect. That to, is so obvious, yet few of us can admit it.
    There will come a time when we will be required to protect oursleves and our homeland. I wonder if disarming eveyone is the way to protect ourselves, then would it be best if all law enforcement officers would disarm themselves? We could now call our army and marines unarmed forces,
    Why are they so hungry to disarm their citizens as soon as they can? Obama hs four more years and is on limited time to get this done. Is it his part of the duty over the last 23 years since GHW Bush told us all that we needed to accept the New wrold order on 9/11/90. The administrations of Bush/Clinton/Bush/Obama have taken its toll on its citizens, this nation, and the Constitution. They ahve little regard or respect for what it represents. it is mroe than a piece of paper as son Bush informed all of us.
    We sit and wait for the final show to fall, and that time is nearer than any of us think.
    Since any gun is an inanimate object, it really isn’t the guns that are the problem. It is not these innocent helpless little boys like Holmes and Lanza (each one’s father connected with the LIBOR investigation.)
    No matter who is the gunman, when others are unarmed, and untrained, the gunmen dominate.
    Train, and then arm the populace, and these shootings, staged or real, will quickly subside. For cowards and bullies hide from the strong and prepared when confronted with equal force.
    It so cowardice to seek to weaken your citizens. Especially when it is on false premises, and lies. My thoughts rest with the James Holmes and Adam Lanza’s final hours when they became the victims of the individuals preparing their only lives they would ever live for the patsies they are begin amde out to be.
    Whaht have we become as a people to allow all this to happen?

  12. haroldsmith  January 9, 2013 at 5:00 pm

    Jim Fetzer,

    You’re good at doing research, here’s something I’ve been thinking about, maybe you could look into it: I’ve heard that Adam Lanza was a vegetarian. I wonder, how many vegetarians have committed mass murder? I would guess few to none. I wonder if there is any way to research this.

    • Amanda  January 9, 2013 at 7:29 pm

      haroldsmith-

      Adam was a vegan! And the reason he was a vegan was b/c he thought it was unethical to hurt animals!! Yet the MSM is trying to tell us that this lanky 20-year-old, who has NO history of violence, NO history of discipline problems, NO history of criminal behavior or aggression toward others, and who has a moral problem with cruelty toward animals, just morphed into some kind of rambo and became a psychopathic mass-murderer of children?!?! Give me a break!

      Anyway, for more on this, check out the video at this link: http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/adam_lanza_was_a_vegan/

      Here’s the excerpt: It was a shared love of live music that sparked a close friendship between Russ Hanoman and Nancy Lanza more than five years ago. Now, in light of the tragedy at Sandy Hook and recent reports suggesting she was a paranoid survivalist, Hanoman is speaking publicly about the woman he knew. As he told PIX 11, “She was a wonderful, beautiful, elegant woman who loved life, and most importantly she loved her son, Adam.” Another small detail emerged in the course of the interview, this time about Adam Lanza. Lanza was vegan, according to Hanoman, because he “didn’t want to hurt animals.”

      And, of course, it’s no surprise that this little factoid about Adam Lanza has been completely ignored by the media. And isn’t it interesting that the MSM hasn’t done any followup interviews with this guy, Hanoman? I mean, it’s obvious that he was good friends with Nancy and probably had lots of other positive things to say about her and perhaps Adam as well–but this wouldn’t fit with the zio-media demonization campaign. The masses are only supposed to hear how evil and disturbed Adam was and how irresponsible his mother was!!

    • haroldsmith  January 9, 2013 at 9:36 pm

      It seems to me that Adam Lanza is being given the Bruce Ivins treatment. It is, in my view, extremely unlikely that a vegan would do this. Having come to such a higher spiritual plane so early in life suggests to me that he was a gifted kid. Most likely his apparent “weirdness” was some kind of existential crisis; i.e., “existential depression” or something like that. If anything he was probably much more toward the other end of the “‘path” spectrum, i.e., more of an empath than a sociopath.

      I believe that the criminals now running the “U.S.” “government” are so treacherously, calculatingly evil that’s it’s simply beyond the ability of most of us to grasp. We’re incredulous. A hundred years ago they were loading munitions – intended to kill Germans – into a passenger ship, the Lusitania, hoping the Germans would attack it and kill everyone onboard. Can you imagine what they plan and carry out on an almost daily basis today? Apparently they operate with impunity just outside the realms of our belief systems.

    • wiggins  January 11, 2013 at 11:19 am

      The German Goverment put adverts in the New York Times warning passengers not to travel on the Lusitania…….the Brits sank it off Ireland.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login


TOP 50 READ ARTICLES THIS WEEK