How the Sandy Hook Massacre Went Down

By Andrew McGregor (with Jim Fetzer)


When asked whether he believed in conspiracy theories, filmmaker Michael Moore replied, “Only those that are true.” The problem is telling the difference.

The two major difficulties we confront with Sandy Hook is figuring out exactly what went down and then making what we have found accessible to the public.  Because I am retired from the University of Minnesota Duluth and James Tracy holds an appointment at Florida Atlantic–and we have both spoken out about Sandy Hook–he and I have become the targets of considerable attention. Perhaps the worst of the lot has been an attack on James Tracy by Anderson Cooper on CNN.

This was very odd, since Tracy’s article about Sandy Hook has to be among the most responsible in print.  While none of us has an serious doubt that the Sandy Hook hoax was contrived to induce hysteria in the public and promote an anti-gun agenda, there are indications that those efforts are falling flat, as multiple sources are reporting in  “Gun groups predict assault weapons ban will fail in Congress” and “Gun lobby: Congress doesn’t have the muscle to pass gun control”

YouTube - Veterans Today -

James Tracy has also published a Sandy Hook “time line”, which makes additional important contributions to understanding what happened there.  But the public is being severely abused by those who are attacking the search for truth about Sandy Hook.  When I was criticized by The Duluth News-Tribune, a friend contacted them and suggested that a response from me might be appropriate.  It was therefore gratifying when the paper published this piece in its Sunday edition (13 January 2013):

Local view: Why the Sandy Hook shootings matter

By: Jim Fetzer, Duluth News Tribune
When asked whether he believed in conspiracy theories, filmmaker Michael Moore replied, “Only those that are true.” The problem is telling the difference.

Having spent much of the past 20 years in collaborative research on dark events (the JFK assassination, 9/11, Sen. Paul Wellstone’s death), Sandy Hook looks to me like part of an escalating series of covert operations designed to promote public hysteria to incite gun control and subvert the 2nd amendment. Here are some reasons why.

A theory is simply an interpretation of facts in a given case. When the police investigate a crime, they form a theory of the case. In courts of law, prosecutors and defense attorneys usually offer alternative interpretations. With Sandy Hook, figuring out what happened poses special challenges.

The facts are not obvious. There were inconsistencies from scratch. The suspect, Adam Lanza, was a student there; then he was not. His mother was a teacher there; then she was not. The principal called the local paper to report the shooting; then she was among the first to die.

The coroner reported all the dead were shot with a Bushmaster; then NBC News reported that four handguns had been found with the body and that the AR-15 had been left in the car. (Check out YouTube, “Sandy Hook shooting — AR-15 rifle was left in the car!”)

Even if Lanza, 20, had done some shooting, the ratio of kills to targets was remarkable. As a Marine Corps officer, I qualified with a .45 four years in a row and also supervised recruits of his age in their marksmanship training. I don’t see how he could have done it.

Police radio in real-time reported two suspects headed toward the officer calling in, one of whom was apprehended. The other was tracked into the woods, as police helicopter footage shows. We have no idea what became of these suspects. So what happened?

Most likely, Adam Lanza and his mother were killed the day before with Adam Lanza’s body picked up by police. He was attired in a SWAT outfit, including body armor, and stored in the school.

I argue a three-man team entered the school. One was arrested in the school, cuffed and put on the lawn. Two went out a back door; one of them was arrested and the other apparently escaped.

Those arrested currently are not in police custody; their names were never released. That is a telling sign that we are being sold a story based on fiction rather than on fact.

Does anything else matter? Most Americans are unaware the Department of Homeland Security has acquired 1.5 billion rounds of .40 caliber, hollow-point ammunition, which is not even permissible during combat under the Geneva Conventions.

A subcommittee of the Senate Committee on Homeland Security has issued a study of 680 reports from “fusion centers” that integrate federal, state and local anti-terrorism efforts. It found no evidence of any domestic terrorist activity.

The absence of any terrorist threat and the existence of more than 300 FEMA camps and special boxcars to carry dissidents to them have been deliberately withheld from the public.

Since Homeland Security has no foreign commitments, those camps and ammunition have to be for domestic consumption. Homeland Security appears to be gearing up to conduct a civil war with the American people — but 80 million armed families stand in its way.

What better excuse could there be for banning assault weapons than the slaughter of 20 innocent children? Sen. Diane Feinstein, D-Calif., has a gun control proposal that would lead to the confiscation of virtually every semi-automatic weapon in the nation.

That’s my interpretation of Sandy Hook.

Jim Fetzer reports for Veterans Today and is a McKnight Professor Emeritus at the University of Minnesota Duluth.

I offer this as an illustration of the extent to which key points need to be spelled out to make the public aware of the crucial background within which the Sandy Hook slaughter must be understood.  In my view, some of the best work on Sandy Hook is coming from the UK, including Nicholas Kollerstrom’s “Sandy Hook:  Analogies with the London 7/7 Bombings”, and “Sandy Hook: US State-Fabricated Terror”.  Among his other astute observations, Nick has noticed the use of actors at Sandy Hook:

An interview with Nick Kollerstrom and Clare Kuehn on “The Real Deal” has been archived and can be accessed here:

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Nick has just published a new study by Andrew McGregor, a constable with extensive experience Down Under, entitled, “How the Sand Hood Massacre went down”, which offers his–exceptionally clear and most intriguing–interpretation of what happened at Sandy Hook, which I am republishing here for readers of Veterans Today.


How the Sandy Hook Massacre went down


by Andrew McGregor


(January 13, 2013) The notorious car photographed leaving the scene of the Sandy Hook school shooting does NOT belong to Adam Lanza or his mother. The audio from the police radio contains the vehicle registration request and reply. The car is registered to Christopher A. Rodia, on charge for larceny and narcotics. Christopher A. Rodia: Rodia, 42, is from Norwalk CT. He has quite a list of previous drug and burglary charges, seems to be big on stealing leaf blowers and is currently awaiting trial for at least his 5th count of stealing a leaf blower. He had an active arrest warrant on October 8th. One of the more recent times he has been in the news was for stealing copper wire from a construction site with his 19-year-old niece, Cassandra Scire, 19. His court hearing was 21 December 2012 for Larceny, Forgery and Narc possession. Rodia and Scire live in the same home at 19 Vollmer Ave., Norwalk, CT. Cassandra is affiliated with one George Uzar arrested with an arsenal of weapons.

This little article tells us quite a lot if this article is correct.  The trouble is, the information is not factual.  The initial report would be factual, but the information would lead to dead ends. This vehicle would be an FBI ‘Operational vehicle’ and thus have fictitious registration details.

What we have at the beginning of the massacre are two vehicles arriving at the Elementary School, one belonging to Nancy Lanza, and the second vehicle supposedly registered to Christopher Rodia, a non-existent person.

Now I doubt if Adam Lanza was in a condition to actually drive to his own murder.  I would suggest that somebody else drove his car to Sandy Hook. I would also suggest that this person was FBI and from the ‘Counter-Terrorist section.  I would suggest that there were also other FBI agents travelling in “Rodia’s” vehicle.

Rodia’s vehicle would contain a driver, the two unnamed men arrested at the Sandy Hook Elementary school and one other person.

What must also be made quite clear is that the Massacre at Sandy Hook follows the same modus operandi as the Dunblane Massacre in Scotland in March 1996.

Now this is important in the plan of things.  I believe that the Sandy Hook Elementary School had a CCTV security system.  It would have been located in the Administration Office of the School.  For the massacre to have gone down as required, this CCTV system had to first be destroyed, much the same as the turning off the CCTV camera in the tunnel where Princess Diana was murdered, and in the London subway and bus, for the 7/7 ‘terrorist event’, and again of course for the assassination of Jean Charles de Menezes.

This is why the ‘gunman’ went first to the Administration room and had the ‘argument with staff’, and caused one brave person to switch on the loudspeaker system alerting the rest of the staff.  The shooting in the administration block was the start of the massacre, and besides the staff therein, the CCTV system would have also been shot up making it incapable of recording all further actions within the massacre.

Now it was possible for the rest of the massacre to unfold.  The second FBI agent gets out of Lanza’s car and hands Lanza over to the two apprehended FBI gunmen.  These two men also pick up a large quantity of required firearms from the vehicle that were discovered by police later on.  The second FBI agent then moves to cover his ‘partner’.

So, did these firearms selected to be left at the scene of the massacre actually belong to the victim, Nancy Lanza?  It would have been extremely unlikely, but what would be more likely would be thatthese firearms would have been placed on Connecticut’s firearm registry in Nancy Lanza’s name by someone from the FBI Counter-Terrorist section.   

Although it is not part of McGregor’s study, the discovery of United Way “condolence fund-raising appeal–dated four days before the massacre’s occurrence–lends further support to the evidence that Sandy Hook was a fabricated event intended as an anti-gun control “psy op“:

Now the FBI agent ‘covering’ his partner would have had a scanning device to pick-up the local police radio calls.  After shooting up the classroom these FBI agents would have been warned of the first approaching police vehicles. 

They immediately return to the Rodia vehicle and the FBI gunman, not wishing to have the ‘Bushmaster’ .223 rifle in his possession in case of capture and arrest by the police, returns it to the trunk of Nancy Lanza’s Honda.  The driver then drives off as the first police units arrive.

Police again using normal video equipment (something we didn’t have in my day) arrived in time to see this vehicle leaving the scene and request registration information.

Again, the first police to arrive at the Sandy Hook Elementary hear ‘shots fired’ and report as such.  This would make the matter urgent and ‘lights and sirens’ may have been activated.

But back to the two FBI gunmen with Adam Lanza.  They are not in a position to be aware of what is happening around them.

They ‘execute’ Adam Lanza as required, and they may have discharged other shots from other weapons, I cannot tell from the information at hand, but again they have not been alerted of the approaching local police until it is far too late.

They attempt to flee, but a teacher informs police of ‘two shadows’ moving past the gym, and the first is apprehended.  After a foot chase into the local woods the second is apprehended.

Now why did one of the arrested offenders yell at parents that they hadn’t murdered the children?  Simply because the truth of the matter is that they didn’t, and the proof of that is that the ‘local’ police found the actual murder weapon in the trunk of Nancy Lanza’s Honda sedan.  This simply proves that there was another team that shot the schoolchildren and their teachers.

How do we know that the FBI agents were in Rodia’s vehicle?  That is easy to answer.  Neither of the two men arrested by police at the Sandy Hook Elementary School were carrying identification.  Nobody knows who they were, and once returned to the local police station, the FBI would have turned up and required these men to be handed over to them.

How do we know that the Sandy Hook Massacre was an FBI operation?  There is a choice of two possibilities.  Either Sandy Hook was another ‘Lone-nut’ gun massacre committed by Adam Lanza or it was an FBI operation. 

Once you comprehend that Adam Lanza was shot after police arrived at the Sandy Hook Elementary school, and yet the main murder weapon, the ‘.223 Bushmaster’, the No. 6 on the gun ban list, was initially found in the trunk of Nancy Lanza’s Honda sedan, then it is impossible for Adam Lanza to have been the gunman.

All leads to the identity of these two FBI agents would vanish, and in time people would be conditioned to simply remember the ‘Lone-nut’ gunman who was ‘suicided’ at the scene of the Sandy Hook Massacre.

Andrew S. MacGregor was Senior Constable 15891 (retired) with the Victoria Police Force, Australia, from 1968-85.

Nicholas Kollerstrom is an historian of science and the author of Terror on the Tube (3rd edition, 2011).

Jim Fetzer

A former Marine Corps officer, Jim Fetzer has published widely on the theoretical foundations of scientific knowledge, computer science, artificial intelligence, cognitive science, and evolution and mentality.McKnight Professor Emeritus at the University of Minnesota Duluth, he has also conducted extensive research into the assassination of JFK, the events of 9/11, and the plane crash that killed Sen. Paul Wellstone.

The founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, his latest books include The Evolution of Intelligence (2005), The 9/11 Conspiracy (2007), Render Unto Darwin (2007), and The Place of Probability in Science (2010).

Related Posts:

The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT or any other VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors or partners and technicians. LEGAL NOTICE - COMMENT POLICY

Posted by on January 14, 2013, With 0 Reads, Filed under WarZone. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Comments Closed

31 Responses to "How the Sandy Hook Massacre Went Down"

  1. LoPhatt  January 20, 2013 at 10:34 pm

    Just as something to file under the “interesting coincidence” file, I ran across a link to Orly Taitz’ site (I know, I won’t go into that here). What WAS interesting is that she was looking for information on the man who had King Soetoro’s SSN (before he appropriated it). Lo and behold, the man was issued the SSN in the mental health/old folks facility locally known as “The Sandy Hook Nut House”. That is where our hero worked as a “psychologist”. Seems that the practice back then was for the staff to fill out the papers so that the hospital could collect the benefits.
    Now, being one of those “crazy conspiracy theorists”, I tend to see things as “connected”. There is a whole line of questioning about how he got his Connecticut SSN (having never lived there!), and, voila, this little article appears. I wonder when our man was working there? Better yet, what chain of events led to this number becoming “available”?
    The article said that the hospital was honeycombed with tunnels. Supposedly they used them to transport patients and even ex-patients to the morgue where-wait for it-the “bodies” from the shooting were taken for autopsy. So if I read the story correctly, these victims were spirited away in the dark of night, in a refrigerated van to the tunnels leading to the morgue at the hospital. There they were subjected to the tender mercies of Dr. Carver.
    So we have Eric Holder making a visit a couple of months ago to set the stage for the agenda. Now we have this SSN connection. We have this hospital where the SSN belonged to a deceased person that is now being used by our leader. Then, of course, we have our current little puzzle. How do a couple of politicians from Chicago get so well connected in Connecticut? Well, there’s certain politician, now retired.
    Just sayin’ just when you think its weird it gets weirder.
    If I were a mathematician I might be able to calculate the odds of all these alignments. Then again, maybe not. Those of us who study these things notice that there are pockets of strange activity. Strange things happen everywhere but I’m talking “strange” here. I think the location for some of these isn’t an accident.
    This thing is starting to look less like a crime scene and more like a Stephen King novel.

  2. LC  January 18, 2013 at 7:48 pm

    Dr. Fetzer:

    I just noticed that in the article above you had presented this GOOGLE-PROOF:

    Now in below links same proof is more visible:

    GOOGLE-PROOF that Sandy Hook was an inside job (& probably nobody was shot at school):

    This screen-shot clearly shows Google recorded the official Sandy Hook Relief Fund site as having been “indexed” three days before the shooting on Dec. 11, 2012

    First link below says “SANDY HOOK SCHOOL SUPPORT FUND-…” & was dated stamped 12/11/2012:

    Taken from:


    ++++other related links a @ **************http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/01/17/sandy-hook-scenario-and-meaning/

  3. Raptor  January 16, 2013 at 10:14 am

    Probate filed, Ryan requested temp appt by petition of court for Stamford attorney to tie up loose ends and established whether or not Mom had a will.

    It was initially said the body would be taken to New Hampshire for burial, only death certificate indicates body was cremated in Haverhill Mass on 19 Dec.



  4. Raptor  January 16, 2013 at 8:13 am

    That pic is suspect, Cooper is what is called a cut-out….in others words, not real…..or maybe he really is alien.. obviously photo-shopped in. But why?

    Most of the photos have evidence of being photo shopped in one way or another, also the clues board, along with many many others….is infected with agents…as I said above/earlier…..they have an unearned superiority complex. Ask yourself why they are allowed to spew at length while the good Prof’s page has been absolutely attacked. Attacked in plain sight in the light of day….can it be that the PROF is a lot more credible and has access to those with still working brain-cells???? He is a ligit threat and may be capable of forcing ones hand when it comes to the truth..

    Anyway….think about this: What is the Mother’s level of involvement? How is she connected to this crime? It is a crime whether it be real, drill, or pure fantasy…….deception and obstruction….Someone claims to have found a recent ( last 12 months ) paper trail left by the Mother…..as if she suspected in some way that Adam and herself may be in some sort of danger…Why, how, and from whom? She was looking for relocation options, some out of the country.

    I suggest you look to the Father and other Son…..you know the one claiming to have not seen his younger Bro in 2 plus full years….who works for Ernst and Young…..( WHAT DO THEY DO ???)

    This has nothing ( in my opinion ) to do with LIBOR……LIBOR is an absolute misdirect, none have been able to find any hard evidence that either Holmes or Lanza were ever called, contacted, subbed—–to appear before any hearing panel to give evidence of anything related to the LIBOR investigation….BUT….

    It’s been stated by one source that GE CAPITAL, along with a few other local institutions, Banks, brokers…ETC were caught up in a bid rigging thing and some Execs——have either been fined/fired/or jailed as a result of……………………….who would be keeping these books.? Wonder who may be that DEPT—-Head?

    Once again…….where are the local residents and their rage against the machine? Why are none coming forward? Did Jean Henry show Adam’s body, or the body of some other person? Why, given her lawsuit would she run the risk of being caught in the act?

    Most all of the content being posted, 90 + % is being read by the machine, collected, stored and kept as a means to check the real temp of those unafraid to discuss this hatchet job.. It’s exactly why people write articles of pure fantasy in regard to the how’s and why’s of such blatantly in your face psyops!!

    People want to know what people have to say…


    • LoPhatt  January 22, 2013 at 3:04 pm

      Raptor, by the way, I realize that. That’s why I say “the drill isn’t over”. Part of a drill is evaluation. That’s why all the disinfo. They’re checking the bait. How far can you push, etc..

  5. Amanda  January 15, 2013 at 5:13 pm

    Okay, people need to go to the link below and scroll down and check out the photo of Victoria Sota’s sisters and family posing with Anderson Cooper:


    I’m sorry, but is this how people grieving for a lost sister/daughter behave?? Do they really smile and pose for photo ops w/MSM news anchors??

  6. captain obvious  January 15, 2013 at 2:48 am

    mainstream media “tampons”..
    white uptight belong out of sight.
    complete with pullstrings and swelling heads,
    trying to hide the blood of warzones…

    we know who qualifies!

  7. LC  January 14, 2013 at 10:14 pm

    The Next School Massacre Target? Conspiracy Website Causes Police to Close Down Virginia School




    Victim’s mom happy or just too EXCITED being on CNN?

    Sandy Hook HOAX (courtesy CNN)


  8. LoPhatt  January 14, 2013 at 9:26 pm

    This is a “plausible” scenario. Look what is happening here. This is just like the “9-11 Movie”. People are arguing about stuff they can’t possibly know. I say that’s by design. We don’t know if anyone, or a few, were even shot, yet alone what “incredible accuracy” there was. It’s true that, if the event happened as described, our Adam could not do it. But, we all “know” it ISN’T as described. At a minimum.
    Now, taking it a step further, fingering the culprit is even more dodgy. It could be any one of a number of alphabet soup agencies and/or their contractors. Or, it could all be a drill and nothing happened but noise, smoke and fury.
    I don’t propose any exact answers because there isn’t enough information for that. What I find interesting (or scary) is how quiet all those town people are. If it is possible to silence a whole town, that’s scary. If it really didn’t happen it would be easier. If it did don’t you think you’d hear from them, ban or no ban? Even if you exclude the victim’s families there are a lot of others who would have had children in that school.
    One day I think it happened, another I’m not so sure. It WAS a psyop and I have absolutely no doubt about their willingness to kill people. This has been going on a long time with less publicity. Same “agency” people.
    I think its good to get as many ideas as possible but we will not know for sure. That’s the whole point. Maybe the point is whether people will accept this without any evidence. If that works they may not even have to waste ammo. They’ll just “say” it happened.
    Really, I think that’s the most shocking thing about this. They have just “said” it happened this way and locked down any evidence. When asked they just stonewall. Some say this took lots of planning. It doesn’t look that way to me. They had the storyline down early to pass to the “news” readers, but the “execution” was pretty sloppy.
    You never really know what these things are all about totally. They may spring the “evidence” at a later date just to discredit those who questioned them. On the other hand they may just go quiet and let the whole thing die down. That would be a giant middle finger from the powers that be.
    I’m not saying it wasn’t the FBI, I just don’t know. I think parts of his analysis are pretty good. Other parts aren’t. Why would the shooter take the AR with him if he wanted Lanza to look like the “lone nut”? Why not just drop it by the body? Just like everyone else I’d like to know what happened here. It’s a cinch it isn’t as described.

  9. leekennedy  January 14, 2013 at 8:48 pm

    There is one thing about this that has been eating away at me: The end game motive here does not seem to be gun control. It just ‘feels’ too simple. What contributes to this gut feeling is the stuff I have been watching from Peter Joseph’s Zeitgeist movies – especially the quote from Nicholas Rockefeller about the RFID chip- and the destabilization tactics used by the US in other countries. My thoughts go something like this: The present Aristocracy is made up of some pretty sophisticated Corporatists and I would think that they have calculated that taking over a population by force of arms is not very cost-effective or efficient. So much control has been gained without overt force, with many of the gun owning citizens welcoming the new laws and restrictions (PATRIOT Act). It seems more efficient to keep the populace divided and in conflict. (Like pitting Tea Party and NRA folks against the Liberals, the working class against the poor, Christians against the Muslims, etc.) Let the citizens destroy the society from within and then implement the police state in response to the cries of, “Keep us safe!”

    Maybe Gun control is not the end game, but a way to get citizens to accept something else: Have some shootings, propose some gun control laws, stir the pot in the conflict between the pro-gun and anti-gun lobbies, have an orchestrated political battle on Capitol Hill, then offer up a “compromise”….. something that will not involve gun bans – so the NRA will go along with it, but will give the appearance of making us safer . Something involving greater surveillance (like the TSA) and police state presence. Armed military in schools? Greater military presence on US soil? Use of military trained “private contractors” for security? Think if Wall Street was allowed to have mercenaries armed with assault rifles outside their buildings instead of police officers. Soldiers who are less restricted in how they are allowed to deal with Occupy protestors.

    There just seems to be something missing from the motive aspect of Sandy Hook. Thoughts?

  10. Raptor  January 14, 2013 at 7:05 pm


    I’ve seen you posting on a few others haunts…Yes. Given that, have you listened closely to the actual scanner feed? Might want to do so and then think about these story lines a bit more. Emotion in the voices of those on the ground, breathing, elevated heart rates, you know don’t you….eliminates a few of the things some would have you believe.

    Thanks xx for the refresher…..very well aware of that drill but nothing wrong with going over old ground again.


  11. truthman  January 14, 2013 at 7:01 pm

    When my government lays down it’s weapons, I will lay down mine.

  12. xx  January 14, 2013 at 4:56 pm

    Sometimes the water is cloudy, are you familiar with The Red Banner Institute of the K-GB, maybe some of their people are in these waters. Are you starting to see some patterns of deception or the large spider web they created?

    Ask yourself something, why employ those as stated above? And who do you believe they are really after, “who” are they really after? Do not get caught in their web.

  13. ethanallen  January 14, 2013 at 4:53 pm

    Notice how all recent news items about Sandy Hook cite the ongoing campaign for gun control. There is very faint mention of violent movies and video games. There are no longer any comments at all about psychoactive medications prescribed to young people.

    The NRA may be tough and Hollywood even tougher but Big Pharma is untouchable.

  14. Amanda  January 14, 2013 at 4:20 pm

    found this posted over at theinfounderground.com:

    Listen to the treatment of Dr. Fetzer by Hesham Tillawi, as Dr. Fetzer TRIES to explain to Mark Glenn, Hesham Tillawi, and Michael Collins Piper, the reasons that so many people believe that Sandy Hook is not what it is being made out to be:


    This was a totally dis-graceful “interview”, and in fact, was nothing more than an ambush against Dr. Fetzer by that arrogant Tillawi, whose contempt against his callers is the precise reason that I refuse to listen to him, but I made an exception in this case. The way that Dr. Fetzer is treated is precisely the reason that more people are not coming out and speaking-up on what they TRULY believe.


    Anyway, I highly recommend people visit the link above, listen to the audio, and post a comment.

    Now, your comment may get rejected like mine was, and all I was doing was indicating my agreement with the comment below from Patty (I think she sums things up quite well):

    Bravo Dr. Fetzer. You did an excellent job despite the hostile circumstances and I totally agree that whatever happened at Sandy Hook, it’s sole purpose as a psychological operation is to disarm the American people beginning with the semi-automatic weapons which the govt. calls “assault weapons”.

    I was disappointed by the ridiculous reasoning presented by Tillawi/Piper/Glenn. They seemed to argue that no one should question or pose alternative theories regarding the latest false flag attacks on the American psyche, at least not on any mainstream forum, lest the mainstream make the entire truth movement into a bunch of kooks and that this would do irreparable damage to the 9/11 movement. This is truly idiotic logic.

    First, who cares about anything the Jew media says. They are the kooks who disseminate only Jew/Govt lies and propaganda to further a sinister agenda. Any lie exposed will be ridiculed by them–Holohoax, 9/11, OKC, USS Liberty, JFK assassination, Pearl Harbor, Adolf Hitler, etc. Jim Fetzer did a great thing by using MSM to alert people there are other ways to look at the events of our day. Only those with ears to hear will hear.

    Second, Tillawi kept on stupidly saying “But there are no facts, only questions and theories”. After 9/11 and the “Holocaust” we were also not privy to hard-core evidence about what really happened. This extends to all historical lies. The inquiry begins with looking at all the inconsistencies and improbabilities in the official story and the lack of evidence to support the official story except for ” the govt/authorities told me so”. The official Sandy Hook story has so many holes in it that it unravels right before our very eyes. Go to http://www.carolynyaeger.net to hear her 2 radio shows on Sandy Hook, Sandy Hook Parts 1 and 2. Part 1 has 2 very interesting guests.

    • duay khwaam nap theuu  January 15, 2013 at 4:23 am


      It is misspelled in the above comment and won’t work.

      Part 2

      Part 1


  15. Amanda  January 14, 2013 at 3:25 pm

    Where is Sandy Hook school’s surveillance video?


    There’s one way to resolve questions about whether Adam Lanza was the lone gunman (or even a gunman at all) who murdered 20 children and 6 adults at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Ct.

    Did you know that the school had a security surveillance system?

    Indeed, WTNH Channel 8 reports, Dec. 14, 2012, that the school had sent a letter to parents on the installation of a new security and surveillance system at the beginning of the 2012-2013 school year. Here’s the letter:

    Dear Members of our Sandy Hook Family,

    Our district will be implementing a security system in all elementary schools as part of our ongoing efforts to ensure student safety. As usual, exterior doors will be locked during the day. Every visitor will be required to ring the doorbell at the front entrance and the office staff will use a visual monitoring system to allow entry. Visitors will still be required to report directly to the office and sign in. If our office staff does not recognize you, you will be required to show identification with a picture id. Please understand that with nearly 700 students and over 1000 parents representing 500 SHS families, most parents will be asked to show identification.

    Doors will be locked at approximately 9:30 a.m. Any student arriving after that time must be walked into the building and signed in at the office. Before that time our regular drop-off procedures will be in place. I encourage all parents to have their children come to school and return home on the bus and to remain in school for the entire school day. The beginning and ending of our school day are also important instructional times and therefore we want all our students to reap the benefits of full participation in our program.

    We need your help and cooperation for our system to work effectively. Our office staff is handling multiple tasks. Though they will work diligently to help you into the building as quickly as possible, there may be a short delay until someone can view you on the handset and allow you to come in electronically. There are times during the day when office personnel are on the telephone, addressing student concerns, or in the copy room; there are other times when only one person is in the front office. Please help our staff by identifying yourself and provide your child’s name. Keep in mind we will be following our district guidelines which may need revision once we test the system.

    Please know your involvement continues to be critical to our school’s effectiveness and your child’s success. We continue to encourage and value your presence in our classrooms and are counting on your cooperation with the implementation of this safety initiative.

    Mrs. Hochsprung

    We are told that sometime before 9:30 a.m. EST on December 14, 2012, 20-year-old Adam Lanza fatally shot his mother, Nancy Lanza, age 52, with a .22 Marlin rifle at their Newtown home. Adam Lanza then drove his mother’s car to Sandy Hook Elementary School.

    At about 9:35 a.m., using his mother’s Bushmaster XM-15, Lanza shot his way through a locked glass door at the front of the school. Connecticut governor Dannel Malloy disclosed that Lanza had broken into the school by firing a volley of bullets through a secured door. After killing 26, Lanza then killed himself when he heard police arriving.

    A commenter on the American Everyman blog, Scott Groves, writes:

    “I’ve been asking this question for the last few days. I’ve asked 2 reporters on twitter about it last night and both refused to look into the video from the school. After they refused to be journalists, they blocked me.”

    So where’s the school’s surveillance video showing Lanza — and Lanza alone — breaking through the secured door?

    If I were the parent of one of the 20 child victims, I would demand to see that video.


    • Gordon Duff  January 14, 2013 at 6:45 pm

      have found above mentioned blog unreliable

    • Raptor  January 14, 2013 at 7:12 pm

      Were they critical of the Arizona thing in regard to J T Ready?


    • haroldsmith  January 14, 2013 at 7:14 pm

      The fact that they won’t show the video – and that fact alone – proves beyond a reasonable doubt that they’re lying about what happened.

      We all know that if they had any video evidence that would support their agenda, e.g., a wild-eyed Adam Lanza holding an AR15 in his hands, they’d be playing it (or portions of it) ENDLESSLY on the TeeVee, just like they always do when they’re trying to make a propaganda point.

      So I say, “let’s see the video, or you’re lying”; and that’s all anyone should have to say, to silence the establishment mouthpieces.

      (BTW I’m still waiting to see the video from the airport in Amsterdam, which would presumably show how Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, the so-called “underwear bomber”, was able to board an international flight (to Detroit) without showing a passport and without going through any kind of security check point. And I have a feeling I’m going to be waiting a long, long, long time).

    • duay khwaam nap theuu  January 25, 2013 at 4:46 am

      Upon what are you basing the assumption that the new security system recorded video.?

  16. Garibaldi  January 14, 2013 at 2:25 pm

    Raptor, you made an inquiry on Fetz’s previous 7/7 thread concerning who might be operating a particular blogspot, to which I replied, here- http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/01/06/sandy-hook-analogies-with-the-london-77-bombings/comment-page-1/#comment-469925
    Unfortunately, the particular subject matter at the link you supplied was not quite on target.
    “Tony Vials” has since collected some vital information on this case (IMHO) and made it available here-

    You’ve been dancing with the devil in the details for long enough now, so I thought I should cut in and give you a break, in return for your timely tip. Please continue to keep in touch, Grazie, ‘Baldi

    • Raptor  January 15, 2013 at 7:06 am

      Thanks, will do.
      I have some stuff to post when time permits, maybe later this afternoon..The PHD down in Fla is taking an unnecessary pounding over his mention of the fact that ” what has been told can’t be the entire truth ”

      I think much of the rest are akin to grasping at straws, why I’m not sure but it’s possible to introduce topics of discussion that will lead nowhere.

      The folks at the clues forum seem to have a complex of superiority when it comes to cracking odd cases…..the majority of those dishing are claiming complete fakery as if it never happened. Their main problem with such are the details which they conveniently leave out of the subject matter at hand.

      A simple example would be: Are there spent casings by the dozens in that school building or not? Live rounds or not?

      I would encourage anyone and everyone interested in learning the facts of this event, to listen to the first 8-9 minutes of the scanner feed…pay close attention to the human elements as they unfold. To me, having a great deal of scanner experience, it speaks loudly and very clearly about the massive state of confusion as it all unfolded.

      The first 911 caller was a male who stayed on the line with the dispatcher as he described what he THOUGHT were gun shots. @ 9:36 am est….@ 9:38:13 the caller says the shooting has stopped..

      Yet @ 9:40:43 an officer with field mic radios back to dispatch that the shooting is still going on.

      While this is going on dispatch is giving directions to the school to responding personnel who are in route….which means many many police are active yet unfamiliar with the schools actual location. Maybe they don’t have the latest tech in CT, maybe NOT!!!

      Fishy as hell to me.

      9:43 an officer is inside the school and finds wounded female….in the foot.
      9:45:46 officer reports bodies…
      9:46:27 female says over radio….” numerous gun shot wounds “….?

      9:46:45…..Newtown officers said to be on scene…….

      Maybe a few questions would be worth hashing out. But at this point given the media narrative, to what end will those question lead?


    • Garibaldi  January 15, 2013 at 10:37 am

      You will find my overall conclusion here:
      I strongly suggest you sit through the hour-long “Sandy Hook Rampage”, so maybe in your “hindsight” you can begin to see this whole operation for what it really is, a “LIVE drill”. There is a lot of good coverage of your “scanner” material later on in the flick. Listen and watch and try to ask yourself if the local police exchanges could really just be “scripted”, or mocked up in any way. IMHO, of course they could. What you need to know is that Federal funds only become available to local municipalities or school districts that have an agreement to “go LIVE”, whenever they are hosting one of these drills. That’s how you “follow the money”. You need to see this one, if you haven’t already, (especially Vance at Oxford)- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UC4XmAAiIek (goin’ on 70,000 hits)
      Also, there’s a brief discussion in this video, which you should listen to very carefully, (as the narrator is rather soft spoken) beginning with the “document from Fox News”, which outlines the funding aspect very clearly, beginning at about 1 minute in. This is essential to ever finding any conceivable motive in this mess. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G20KtylRmJg
      {Interesting that Governor Malloy, at his press conference, used the phrase “played itself out”, saying that he and the Lt. Gov. had been “spoken to” and then repeated – to be prepared for something like this “playing itself out” in our state…….Freudian slip?}

    • mcfadden  January 15, 2013 at 8:09 pm

      Rap, I have what I consider to be a better idea, re: Columbine, Giffords, Klackamas, Occupy, Aurora, and Sandy Hook.
      This is ONE of the videos ( which I tinied ): http://tiny.cc/psgzqw.
      This is the work of one Ed Chiarini, aka dallasgoldbug, aka Wellaware1.com. Ed, at 15, did the graphic illustrations for a book on the JFK op. It was the Giffords psy-op that first attracted Ed’s attention, and his work relative to this operation is superb.
      I have had some difficulty in accepting the denouement of Ed’s efforts, which are encapsulated in this clip. Other clips are available. Long story short: David Rockefeller, head of Operation Paperclip, had Adolph Eichmann repatriated to this country, renamed him Maurice Strong, and put him in charge of his Canadian oil properties. If you haven;t heard of this jerk Strong, begin now. UberZionist. World-renowned. Sponsors UN talks. Forced to leave Canada and resides in China! He alslo had Mengele situated in Canada and renamed Greenberg – as in Maurice. I know this will force an almost unbearable twist in some of your psyches – but that’s the nature of the hellish Rockefeller world we inhabit and will continue to inhabit until we stand up and take from them what they have stolen from us – beginning with liberty. And the whole point of this operation on their part is just this – sequestering us from the inherent liberty of our existence. An existence granted by Life itself, free of the tyranny these socio-jerks work so hard for.
      And, by the way, the photo in the article above titled “Sandy Hook Actors” is from Ed’s site.
      PLEASE, I see many names in the comments section here that are regulars. PLEASE take the time to review this material.

      Peace (LockedandLoaded).
      Peace (aka LockedandLoaded),

  17. Raptor  January 14, 2013 at 1:28 pm

    Of All I’ve read, eyes about crossed now, of this event this one stands alone as the most utterly ridiculous of them all…..Which is about what one should expect by now, the window has closed, all that’s left is that crashing sound when the rug gets tugged out from under all this utter BS.

    The spinmeisteres are indeed blasting away with little regard for those of us with brains, insulting to say the very least.

    What was said to be an AR PLATFORM .223 Cal weapon.. found in trunk…was later confirmed to be a shotgun…Dunn initially said Benelli M-2 or 4 I thought it to be an 870-express tactical and another poster here correctly identified it as a Russian Saiga ( sic ) …..so there was/were no AR’s found in any trunk…whether it be Rodia’s or Lanza’s or the tooth fairy’s.

    I respect everyones right to opinion, always have and always will, but this is getting insanely silly.

    If Rodia is fictitious then the Courant, or WTF ever rag it was that wrote a fluff piece on him IS CULPABLE. What are those watchdogs doing?

    Seriously……one of two possibilities said at the end of this article is the key to this being 100% BS….EXCLUDE THE LONE NUT…..Logistics proves that scenario to be IMPOSSIBLE……DUDES….THINK…..Take three boxes of speer .40 ammo hold em in one hand, now imagine you’re 110 lber Adam Lanza…you’ve yet to pack your weapons, and other said gear……clips and ….any weight to that stack of 3 boxes you’re holding yet??????????

    RIDICULOUS……So you’re left with 1 possibility ” THE FBI ” And we’re to believe that an agency with an almost unlimited capital supply in all aspects of logistics is going to work out something as UTTERLY SLOPPY as this Sandy Hook drill/op/gun grab/firehouse/crisisactors/aurora/end of the day fakery….I mean..come on.


    • Preston James, Ph.D  January 14, 2013 at 2:43 pm

      Raptor you don’t have a clue about how the real world works. No kid this age would ever be capable of the quality of shooting claimed. There are far too many contradictions and NO real evidence released. And one thing you don’t know is that national security was immediately invoked by Homeland Security which locked down all the evidence. You need to ask yourself why.

      This SH Mass Murder has all the fingerprints of a deep black SOG type covert op. Folks caught and released at the scene with no explanations, HD videos seized but not shown. No crime scene photos shown to journalists as is typically done. There are a number of groups inside American intel and the alphabets that do these ops, some have been caught. But they have a get out of jail free card, which you probably have no clue about.

      This retired police officer from down under has done a great job connecting the dots. Let me give you an example. When the sniper in a black helicopter circling Waco that shot three of Clintons security team members through the head from above was later interviewed, he kept saying, “Yep, we are honed to kill, honed to kill, honed to kill, honed to kill”. He was proud of it, especially when these deaths were blamed on the branch Davidians.

      Or just like at Ruby Ridge where another team member shot a fed so it could be blamed on the Weaver group or where one member shot an unarmed mom holding a baby. Real heroes protecting national security, right? This is the way they work and are proud of it. These men are murderers operating as USG thugs. And until we dump these national security laws, which are crimes and nConstitutional in and of themselves, nothing will change. There can be no national security for these crimes against the people.

    • haroldsmith  January 14, 2013 at 6:14 pm

      If you’ve got a better theory, let’s hear it.

      The only thing I can fault the article for is perhaps not putting FBI in quotes. It may not have been the FBI per se, but could’ve been a contractor, e.g., hired killers from a drug gang, Mossad, etc.; someone acting on behalf of the “government”. We know they’re using hired killers in Libya, Syria, etc., so why not here too?

      And as far as “sloppy” goes: Who gives a damn about sloppiness? We’re at the point in our decline where “sloppiness” is not only not problematic, but may in fact be a desirable feature of these pathetic hoaxes. With most of the peasantry still in denial, why not wring out every last bit of incredulity? The deeper some of us bury our heads, the deeper we have to bury our heads.

      If Silverstein can publicly implicate himself (in 9/11 related crime) and nothing happens; and the “underwear bomber” can board an international flight without a passport and without going through security – right in broad daylight in front of several witnesses – and nothing happens, and if “Obama” (if that’s even his real name) can post a crudely forged document on a “U.S.” “government” web site and claim it’s his birth certificate, and nothing happens, then I submit we’re way beyond the point where the operatives have to careful about very much.

  18. stephanaugust  January 14, 2013 at 12:11 pm

    Was waiting for something like this.

  19. dalethorn  January 14, 2013 at 10:23 am

    Looks like we’re getting closer, Jim. Someday as technology progresses, we should be able to observe these guys in real time instead of after the fact from a few undestroyed bits of evidence. Should we expect then that these operations will use robots? Consider the reports of places like Dulce NM circa 1980’s, and strange-looking humans who may have been bred in captivity by descendants of the Paperclip guys. If there are a fair number of captive-bred and trained humans, what would they be capable of? And how difficult would it be to make their appearances match that of ordinary citizens?

You must be logged in to post a comment Login