JFK: An Open Letter to Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.

by Ralph Cinque (with Jim Fetzer)


When I published “JFK: What we know now that we didn’t know then” (21 November 2011), I had become convinced by the discovery of the obfuscated face of a figure in the doorway area of a famous photograph taken by AP photographer James “Ike” Altgens (technically known as the “Altgens6″), together with having recently learned that Lee Oswald had told Will Fritz (the homicide detective who had interrogated him) that he had been “out with Bill Shelley in front” during the assassination, that this figure had to have been Lee himself.  The only reason to have altered the photo would have been that someone had been there who should not have been there, where the obvious candidate for that role was the designated “patsy”.

We now believe that that person was actually Bill Shelley, no doubt erased on the presumption that, if it were discovered that Bill Shelley had been there, too many questions would have been raised about what Lee had said to Fritz.  It would therefore be more efficient to simply delete his image from the photo and remove any reason for asking about it.  Ralph Cinque read my article, however, and contacted me, explaining that, while he agreed with my conclusion (that Lee was in the doorway was right), my premises (about how we could prove that to be the case) were mistaken–that the crucial question was the clothing, not the facial images (which were ambiguous), but where a close study of the clothing and build of the figure in the doorway were those of Lee Oswald.

We would begin publishing a series of articles entitled, “JFK Special: Oswald was in the doorway, after all!”, which would lead to a total of five, which have been supplemented by several others, including “JFK believe it or not:  Oswald wasn’t even a shooter!” and “JFK: 49 Years in the Offing — The Altgens reenactment”.  We have gone far enough to establish that the man in the doorway was Lee Oswald, the designated patsy, which means that he cannot have also been on the 6th floor shooting at JFK.  So not only was he not “the lone assassin”, he wan’t even a shooter, where I provide an introduction to what we have discovered here:

YouTube - Veterans Today -

The strongest argument that has been advanced against the Altgens6 having been altered has been that it went out over the wire within 30 minutes or so, which would not have allowed enough time for that to have happened. Anyone who studies the doorway images, however, can see that, not only has that face been obfuscated, but the man in the doorway is missing his left shoulder and the man behind him, who is wearing a black tie, is simultaneous both IN FRONT OF and BEHIND HIM at the same time, as we have emphasized in most of our studies.  When the evidence of alteration is as blatant as this–where these features are not even anatomically or photographically possible–how could anyone have doubts about whether or not the photo had been altered? Since the photo was altered, there had to have been time to have altered it.

Indeed, one of our senior members, Roy Schaeffer, was working as a photo processor at the Dayton Daily News when he personally received the Altgens6 photo-fax. Immediately, he could see signs of alteration, such as “masking” and “opaquing.” In an earlier study, I observed that the 22 November 1963 issue of The Sheboygan Times includes a photo of the Altgens, which struck me as having to be the outcome of a CIA substitution, which I mentioned at the time.  Now Ralph has confirmed that that was indeed the case, where the real issue and the substitute issue have both been revealed.  Here is the late edition of the Benton Harbor, MI, News-Palladium for 22 November 1963:  the one on the left is real, the one on the right is not–but was fabricated to make it look as if Altgens6 was published that day:

For those who would like to learn more about the assassination of President Kennedy, I recommend  “Dealey Plaza Revisited: What happened to JFK?” and “What happened to JFK–and why it matters today”.  More recent studies of the assassination can be found at “Veterans Today, Jim Fetzer”.

YouTube - Veterans Today -

Among the most important books about the assassination are (with regard to the scientific evidence), Murder in Dealey Plaza (2000), which I edited; and (with regard to the politics of the assassination), James Douglass, JFK and the Unspeakable (2010), which demonstrates how he had antagonized the most powerful special interests in the nation, including the CIA, the Joint Chiefs, the Mafia and the Eastern banking establishment; and Phillip F. Nelson, LBJ: The Mastermind of JFK’s Assassination (2010), which explains what they did about it, where Lyndon Johnson and J. Edgar Hoover played pivotal roles. An especially disturbing study of possible Israeli complicity in the death of JFK has been published by Michael Collins Piper, Final Judgment (5th edition, 2000).

An Open Letter to Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.


By Ralph Cinque

Dear Mr. Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.,

I applaud you for stating publically that your uncle, President John F. Kennedy, was murdered by the CIA. And, I am sure you realize that your father, Senator Robert F. Kennedy, was murdered because, as President (and surely he would have been elected President), he would have reopened the investigation of your uncle’s murder.

And, I am sure you know how politically incorrect it is to question the official account of either murder. But actually, what is politically incorrect is to SERIOUSLY question them. It’s OK to vaguely question them, to say things like, “I think there was a Mafia connection” or “I bet the Cubans were involved.” But, after saying such things, you are expected to just drop it and move on. It’s when you seriously expect something to be done about it–for some change to take place–that’s when you cross the line and become a pariah.

But, you have already crossed that line, Mr. Kennedy, because of what you said the other night and because of who you are. And, in the JFK world, you are taking heat for it. Professor John McAdams, a leading JFK disinformationist, started a thread about you on his forum to ridicule and debase you. He and others like him realize the threat that you pose, not only for being a Kennedy, but for being such a prominent, distinguished, and influential Kennedy.

But, the big question is: What are you going to do now? Are you going to do as they expect and just drop out and go away and let everything settle back into the familiar “angle of repose”? Or are you going to pick up the ball and run with it?

YouTube - Veterans Today -

If you, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., were to join the forefront of the JFK truth movement, it would revolutionize and redefine it, and give it a shot in the arm. And if you’re willing to consider doing that, then I would urge you to consider taking the pivotal step of joining the Oswald Innocence Campaign.

The OIC embraces all aspects of JFK truth, but the thing that unites us and forges us into a cohesive group is the recognition that Lee Harvey Oswald was standing in the doorway of the Texas Book Depository during your uncle’s execution. It is something you can see with your own eyes if you look closely at the evidence. There really isn’t any doubt about it.

It starts with recognizing how unique Oswald’s shirt was. It was no ordinary shirt. You couldn’t buy one like it today–at any price–at least, not in this country. And, believe me, I know because I searched for one, and I would have paid any price. Oswald’s shirt was more like a hybrid between a shirt and a jacket. And some observers at the time actually referred to it as a jacket. It was lightweight like a shirt, but it tended to lay like a jacket, with a long lapel on the left side. It also tended to sprawl open widely when unbuttoned–much more so than a regular shirt. That may have been enhanced some by Oswald’s thin condition because it’s obvious that he lost significant weight between New Orleans and Dallas.

Look at these two images of him:

On the left is his arrest picture from August 1963 in New Orleans. The New Orleans Police weighed him and said he weighed 140 pounds. Isn’t it obvious that, by his arrest in Dallas, he had lost significant weight? As I make the comparison with my doctor’s eyes, I say he must have lost about 8 pounds, which would put him at 132. That is my educated guess. And since Lovelady weighed 175 pounds (according to the FBI who weighed him), that is a difference of 43 pounds. And, in this case, the lighter man was at least one inch taller than the heavier man–and maybe more than that. Do you really think that with such a weight-spread between them that those two men could be mistaken for each other?

But, there is one more aspect of the shirt to bring to your attention: At the top, coming off the left lapel, there was a button loop whose purpose was to secure a distant button that was located under the right collar. Do you see what I mean now when I say that it was no standard shirt? And the uniqueness, the non-standardness of the shirt is something that has not been addressed before–at least not in a loud, provocative way, like we are doing. It was a tough break for the conspirators that Oswald wore such an unusual shirt that day.

I combed the cities of Austin and Dallas looking for such a shirt. I went to the finest stores, checkbook in hand, and I would have paid any price. Besides that, I did an earnest search online for such a shirt but found nothing. I am quite certain that it is not available in the United States in 2013. But, is there any good reason to think it was even available in the United States in 1963? If it was, we would see examples of it on other male figures from that era. Thanks to the Internet, we can easily search images of men from that era. I have yet to find a single image of another individual wearing such a shirt.

The greatest likelihood is that Oswald acquired that shirt during his 3 year sojourn to Russia. Either he bought it, or it was given to him. The manufacturing origin of the shirt was probably Russian or East European, and I have been told that by multiple informed sources. And it was nothing at all like the standard flannel checkered shirt that Lovelady is CLAIMED to have worn. I say “claimed” because there is controversy about which shirt Billy Lovelady actually wore.

For many months–or longer–he claimed to have worn a red-and-white, short-sleeved striped shirt.  He actually went to the FBI on 29 February 1964 and showed them the shirt he had been wearing that day, which they photographed and included in their official report back to FBI Headquarters in Washington, D.C.  A New York student of the assassination, Jones Harris, even flew to Dallas and confirmed with Billy Lovelady that he had indeed worn this red-and-white, short-sleeved shirt, which leaves no doubt about it.

But, there is another distinguishing aspect of Oswald’s clothing: his t-shirt. The opening of the t-shirt had the tendency to descend into a notch or vee. The t-shirt wasn’t designed that way. It was designed as a standard round t-shirt. But, Oswald had the habit of tugging on it–pulling down on it at the six o’clock position–thereby stretching it out and deforming it into a vee.

It varied how much the vee manifested. Sometimes it was barely noticeable, and that was when the t-shirt was riding high, meaning that it was pulled up in front and down in back. But, at other times, it pulled down in front, and that would accentuate the vee. What we see in the doorway is about average for Oswald.

And it is a perfectly formed and perfectly centered vee. There is no way it could be a chin shadow, as some have claimed. Chin shadows are never so perfect and never so centered. Besides, I went to Dallas in late November of last year, and I stood in the doorway at 12:30, and there was no vee-shaped shadow. Here is the shadow that I got:

On the left, I was wearing my designated Oswald shirt, and on the right, I was wearing my designated Lovelady shirt–not the one he actually wore, but the one officials have claimed he was wearing–and, in both cases, the neck shadow was nothing at all like the perfectly centered, perfectly symmetrical and perfectly balanced vee that we see on Doorman.

The vee we see on him is simply the junction of his t-shirt and his skin. The Tri-X film that Ike Altgens used was very polarizing, and even Caucasian skin was rendered dark if it was out of the direct sunlight. We know beyond any doubt that the vee we see on Doorman was the actual shape of his t-shirt, and we proved it in Dallas.

So what that means is that Doorman’s entire wardrobe, his entire ensemble, was pure 100% Oswald. From the neck down, Doorman was definitely all Oswald.

What about from the neck up? Well, according to the anthropologists who were hired by the House Select Committee on Assassinations in the late 1970s, Doorman’s minute facial features were those of Lovelady. But, keep in mind that they relied on measurements that cannot be seen with the naked eye. And therefore it is impossible for any of us to confirm what they said. But what we can say is that the Doorman’s ear is definitely that of Oswald, and Doorman’s chin is definitely that of Oswald. Here are two charts by Richard Hooke, which demonstrate that to be the case:

Obviously, if there are some Lovelady features on Doorman (and the one most frequently cited is his hairline) but most of him is Oswald, then something is wrong. Just as centaurs do not exist in Nature, neither do composites of Oswald and Lovelady.

We have discovered that Doorman’s image was Loveladyfied, just as one of Lovelady’s FBI photos has been Oswaldified. Unfortunately, the Altgens photo was never subjected to a forensic photographic examination–to look for signs of alteration, which would have been criminal.

But, it is hardly surprising, for if the government made the alterations, they were hardly going to hire photographic experts to identify them. Again, the Altgens photo was NEVER evaluated in that way–forensically. It was always and automatically assumed that the photograph was legit.

Mr. Kennedy, what I have said here is just the tip of the iceberg. But, I am not going to say more at this time because I do not want to overwhelm you. But, please visit the website of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, where you can find photos of the senior members of the project:

We want you to join us. We invite you to join us. And we implore you to join us. As we approach the 50th anniversary of your uncle’s death, we think the rallying cry should be:


And surely you realize that if we break the JFK assassination wide open, the revelation of the truth about your father’s murder will follow very quickly. That lie will collapse in no time at all.

So, please, give this your utmost consideration. We are all doing this for the sake of truth. No one is being paid. There are no ulterior motives. We just want the truth to be known. And the truth is that Lee Harvey Oswald was standing in the doorway while your uncle, President John F. Kennedy, was being shot to death.

Ralph Cinque, a chiropractor, health spa operator, and entrenpreneur, has published a series of articles on JFK at lewrockwell.com. His video series, “Visible Proof That Oswald Was Innocent”, is archived on YouTube.

James H. Fetzer, a former Marine Corps officer, is McKnight Professor Emeritus at the University of Minnesota Duluth and a columnist for Veterans Today, where his most recent studies of the assassination of JFK can be found.

Jim Fetzer

A former Marine Corps officer, Jim Fetzer has published widely on the theoretical foundations of scientific knowledge, computer science, artificial intelligence, cognitive science, and evolution and mentality.

McKnight Professor Emeritus at the University of Minnesota Duluth, he has also conducted extensive research into the assassination of JFK, the events of 9/11, and the plane crash that killed Sen. Paul Wellstone.

The founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, his latest books include The Evolution of Intelligence (2005), The 9/11 Conspiracy (2007), Render Unto Darwin (2007), and The Place of Probability in Science (2010).

Related Posts:

The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT or any other VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors or partners and technicians. Notices

Posted by on January 18, 2013, With 0 Reads, Filed under History, Of Interest. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Comments Closed

24 Responses to "JFK: An Open Letter to Robert F. Kennedy, Jr."

  1. HolgerDanske  January 22, 2013 at 4:18 am

    @Ordinary Serf

    “Jim is a top authority on JFK subject and just because your ‘truth’ is different to his, does not mean your ‘truth’ is right in my opinion.”

    I’m not presenting opinions. Just facts. That’s the difference. Jim will never know if he is right because it seems he doesn’t understand how these people, behind the curtain, run the world. He rejects the history claiming he never came across any evidence? Well, there is plenty. But he must study it. That takes time. There is 1 single thing they must be in control of to enslave us. They run everything else, sure. But only because they control the 1 thing – ‘money creation’.

    Forgive me for saying. But you don’t learn MPE in a few hours. It takes about a week if you study intensely. It will change your life forever. For the better that is. I was hoping VT really wanted to prevent any further suffering imposed on it’s people. I was wrong. VT has a different agenda.

    Off topic. Well, as I stated before. VT only writes about symptoms. In order to understand how those symptoms came about – you would have to understand the root cause. That is what you call off topic? The why even write about symptoms in the first place? What’s the point?

    • OrdinarySerf  January 22, 2013 at 5:41 am

      VT comment policy asks us to “Keep posts on-topic. Discussion should remain centered around the topic of the page in question. While discussions can evolve over time, please try to keep your comments related to the original topic”.

      I understand there is a wider ‘money changers’ implication here and JFK was moving to resolve that key issue in society in the period before his disgraceful murder, but am simply saying to you that there are numerous articles on VT do debate that specific topic and this is not one of them.

      I realised that I had erred in responding to you on this and have recognised that, so am moving on now, but happy to exchange views and links with you on a monetary system related article in future (it is an interesting topic).

  2. Ken Rechtstein  January 21, 2013 at 11:17 am


    I agree with Dr Fetzer that implicating Rome (The Vatican) in the assassination of JFK is the weirdest thing I have ever heard or read.

    Rome owns nothing of importance anymore and, with the nomination of Joseph Alois Ratzinger as Pope Benedict XVI, the International Zion Talmudic Mafia has gotten even more power than its Dons could dream of over The Vatican.

    Who controls the MONEY is who controls the world. Those who do are the Dons of said Zion Talmudic Mafia, i.e. The Rothschild and Associates from the Federal Reserve and the BIS, absolutely not The Vatican.

    @Dr Fetzer,

    An absolutely factual and well researched article that includes those details that have been neglected by those who thought that crime does pay and that nobody will care about who were behind the murder of one more US president, the only one who really had the shovel under the Money Lenders/Talmudlandia’s plans to go nuclear, and wanted a real change in the USA to the benefit of the American People, not the Banksters and not the Armament Industry.

    • HolgerDanske  January 21, 2013 at 12:21 pm

      Please proof your claims. You can start by researching religious history. You come up with nothing but an opinion because you haven’t got anything else? You are describing a ‘web’ of tools. Not how they originated? Because when you research them you learn that there is always a new layer and then a new one etc.

      Watch the presentation by Walter Veith. It’s all out there in the open. You just have to learn the meaning of the symbols. The true and only enemy loves to brag about them. It’s a good thing that the enemy is arrogant.

      Can you explain the term ‘money changers’ – What does it mean? From your comment it becomes clear to me you have a lot to of studying to do.

    • OrdinarySerf  January 21, 2013 at 3:19 pm

      Hope you don’t mind me saying this, but I am sure experienced people such as Jim and Ken would appreciate your rather condescending debating approach Holger !

      I see you are a big fan of Veith.

      Money changers – do you mean this ?

      Google Search: i am the witness.com/ DarylBradfordSmith_Bankers.htm

    • OrdinarySerf  January 21, 2013 at 3:20 pm

      Typo – I mean NOT sure obviously

    • HolgerDanske  January 21, 2013 at 5:18 pm

      Here are his words to me – “In all my decades of research on the death of JFK, I have not encountered any evidence whatsoever that would substantiate the claims being made here. I am sorry, but this looks like drivel to me”

      Perhaps he has not been looking in the right places. The people behind the assassination plot of JFK are not amateurs? – Just because Jim didn’t come across any evidence does that make him the highest authority on the subject? This is not to devalue his efforts for learning the truth. But does it?

      Furthermore, I’m not a ‘fan’ of Veith. But if I were so what? Is anything he puts forward in the presentations incorrect? If it is then please provide the evidence.

      Google: Mike Montagne – Mathematically Perfected Economy. Learn MPE and you will understand what ‘money changers’ mean. In 1968 Mike Montagne proved how to solve our entire global debt problem in a day. If we do this we take out our enemy, peacefully.

      I repeat. VT is not interested in the proven solution published 45 years ago. VT has a different agenda?

      Obama and all the other Presidents since Ford wasn’t interested either. We have proof.

    • OrdinarySerf  January 22, 2013 at 3:32 am

      OK Holger, read about MPE and he is not saying anything new there. But actually, it occurs to me that this is ‘off topic’ for Jim’s post under the guidelines, so won’t be entering into a debate here. However, there are numerous other contributors to VT who do deal with this important topic and perhaps that is where this particular angle should be debated.

      Jim is a top authority on JFK subject and just because your ‘truth’ is different to his, does not mean your ‘truth’ is right in my opinion.

  3. EJO2839  January 21, 2013 at 9:30 am


    • HolgerDanske  January 21, 2013 at 11:01 am

      Impossible. The bankers have gained control with metals by falsifying ownership of our promissory notes/$ we issue to each other to pay for our debt to each other. This way they bought up our gold with our money and property. They even banned us from owning it with the help of our so-called elected representatives?

      Learn the basic math: http://australia4mpe.wordpress.com/category/why-a-gold-standard-cant-work/

  4. HolgerDanske  January 20, 2013 at 6:02 pm

    Isn’t it obvious that Rome was behind JFK’s death given the fact it is illegal under roman catholic law to engage in war with another catholic country? And Rome DOES own the corporation know as the United States of America through New Jerusalem’s Crown Corporation. New Jerusalem being the City of London.

    JFK said in a speech he was not going to bow for Rome. This was a big mistake. When the invasion of Cuba failed the CIA blamed the President. I bet you the CIA’s Jesuits cut a deal with Rome and arranged for JFK’s downfall by intentionally failing to invade Cuba. LHO was just conveniently placed in Dallas on that fatal day to serve his purpose as the ‘lone gunman’. Fidel Castro is a Jesuit and therefor a servant of the Roman Empire. It’s all one big theatre in place to manipulate the public into fear.

    Professor Walter Veith did some fantastic research on this issue. The issue being the Vatican, The Roman Empire, The Jesuits, The Knights of Malta and the Freemasons.

    Quite a nice little gathering you got there in Washington.

    When will you start to promote mathematically perfected economy in order to stop these madmen? The only tool these powerbrokers have to control us all with is money. Once we start to issue our own interest free promissory notes which are what money is we can stop them instantly. Peacefully. But I guess people are fine with the evil abuse these people are responsible for. Coz all we ever hear about are symptoms of abuse of power and usury. Never simple peaceful solutions we can implement tomorrow.

    Anyway, good luck getting nowhere.

    • Jim Fetzer  January 20, 2013 at 11:08 pm

      This strikes me as a strange comment. In all my decades of research on the death of JFK, I haven not encountered any evidence whatsoever that would substantiate the claims being made here. I am sorry, but this looks like drivel to me. I really don’t understand where some people come up with some of this.

    • HolgerDanske  January 21, 2013 at 1:58 am

      Do your research then.

      Here is Walter Veith – not postulating things. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eDrscByKEUQ

      If you want to stop the people pulling the strings the only way is to take away the only power that keeps them in power. The power to create money.

      Now, call that drivel or whatever you feel the need to call it. You don’t really state what part of my post was drivel. Which is a load of drivel wouldn’t you agree?

    • HolgerDanske  January 21, 2013 at 10:52 am

      Here is another interesting take on the subject. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BLHsUWFaUmQ

      You just have to dig deep enough.

      Let us know when VT is ready to end the madness. I’m done reading about the symptoms.

  5. dalethorn  January 19, 2013 at 3:09 pm

    I looked at Altgens for years, always confusing the bulge on the cheek as belonging to the Doorman. Just blocking that with my hand, I can see it’s Oswald, plain as day. Should Kennedy Jr. ever come to grips with the scope of this thing, what could he say that would allow him to continue living? Probably just what he’s saying now.

    • Clare Kuehn  January 19, 2013 at 3:16 pm

      Yes, though the forehead is Lovelady’s hairline with the scoop out in the middle and the side baldness, not a widow’s peak in the middle. The whole thing is a bit of a muddle. They also moved the head. The actual t-shirt would continue through the cheek. You can see this in a movie based on Mark Lane’s book, Rush To Judgment. For a screen capture, note the blurred light line through Doorway Man’s cheek. http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/04/13/jfk-special-2-oswald-was-in-the-doorway-after-all/ Yet the chin is cut straight through the lips. So it seems they wanted the head to look more straight up and the body tilted.

  6. thorshammer1999  January 19, 2013 at 7:23 am

    Very good.

    And lest we forget John John. The cover up of the events around his death is so obvious. (The Coast Guard reports he contacted the tower, then the Air Force says he didn’t and the news tapes are cut, etc.) There can be no other explanation than murder. He was sniffing into politics and the bastards got rid of him. I’m so tired of this evil cabal(s)….They need to be swept aside for humanity to rise.

    • Jim Fetzer  January 19, 2013 at 12:12 pm

      While I cannot claim to have proof, we know there are many indications that George H.W. Bush had a role in the assassination of JFK. See,

      “Was George H.W. Bush involved in the assassination of JFK?”

      I have the gut feeling that, after the plane was prepped, the son was involved in executing the son just as the father was involved in executing the father.

    • dalethorn  January 19, 2013 at 3:11 pm

      Very, very likely. And it would put stars in his crown at the private club, to borrow from an old Christian expression.

  7. Chandler  January 18, 2013 at 8:47 pm

    Mr. Fetzer: All my life I have lived with a great deal of unrest because of the assassination of JFK. I own and have read so many books about it, I have lost count. I own every DVD available, and watched them many times. My entire life has been affected by this one happening. Zapruder film haunts me as I see it over and over again when I stop and think about this macabre event.

    Your articles are fascinating. I know they are factual and disprove the Warren Commission’s Report.

    Knowing what we know, it is even worse I think sometimes that my government continues to lie its wazoo off trying to keep the truth hidden or twisted. They not only killed JFK but his son, that little fellow crawling out from under the president’s desk through that little opened door. Imagine being so scared of someone, that you cannot let them live their life. Imagine hating–someone hating another–so much they have to arrange their murder–then arrange the murder of their son. Such is the life of cowards who do what they do and stay hidden. So proud of their work, they stay hidden.

    In my youth, I idolized JFK. I clung to his every word, watched his every move. No one compares or comes close to his intellect, his wit, his thinking and negotiating skills, ability to deliver a speech, seek peace, and know the perils of the hidden power of this country even back then.

    I wish RFK Jr. luck. His father also was a great man with great ideas of a better life for all.

    LHO was a patsy, and it is sad he was set up by these hideous hidden cowards who are still alive today, who could do so much good by coming out and telling the story, admitting the truth, before they are die off. I appreciate every word you’ve written on this subject. One day we may once again be one nation under God, and truly indivisible, with liberty and justice for all, including the only president we have ever had who gave a damn about us, the common citizens of this once great and morally correct country.

    Thank you Mr. Fetzer.

  8. Fed Up  January 18, 2013 at 7:37 pm

    I’d also like to know who rigged the plane that killed JFK, Jr, his wife, unborn child and his sister-in-law.

    • Jim Fetzer  January 19, 2013 at 12:07 pm

      Among the most excruciating experiences of my life has been hearing about the killers who may have been involved in the major assassinations of the 1960s, but also involved in the death of John-John, who may have been lured to an airport near Toronto for his plane to have been loaded with explosives. See my earlier article,

      “Bank Robbers and Serial Killers: The CIA hires them, the FBI ignores them”, http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/12/21/bank-robbers-and-serial-killers-the-cia-recruits-them-the-fbi-ignores-them/

    • Clare Kuehn  January 19, 2013 at 3:10 pm

      This link of murderers from Canada is why — in spite of his uncareful thinking at times, too — Salvador Astucia named his site jfkmontreal.com ——– He did such good work on the specifics of the deaths John Lennon, Hendrix, Morrison. Unfortunately, as I told you, he also overplays the Jewish Zionist name for the conspiring, and also overplays the FBI over the CIA or Mi5 and CSIS in Canada. Anyway, the link to Canada is ultimately to Montreal’s Bronfmans (helping the Meyer Lansky crowd), and the use of Permindex (the BCCI of its day) — related to the DalTex. Permindex was discovered by Jim Garrison as having been involved in the funding. This raises the connections of the Jewish Mob but also of the Europeans (esp. British and Masonic). Permindex was also the launderer for the Vatican Banco Ambrosiano scandal of the P2 Italian and other Masonic groups.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login