Jonathan Kay Was Right All Along… Sort Of
By Gordon Duff, Senior Editor
Managing Director, Adamus Defense Group
A careful and systematic investigation of the 9/11 Truth Movement by intelligence professionals has categorically found “footprints” of multiple police and intelligence agencies that now actively direct many if not most activities.
The current level of dissension among “truthers” is extremely high, due, primarily, to behind the scenes maneuvering that has promoted certain “hopelessly flawed” individuals into positions of prominence.
Their “handlers,” invariably members of police agencies or foreign intelligence assets foment disunion through endless “witch hunts” and misdirection. The nature of the misdirection is simple. The largest terror act in history is being attributed to “pixie dust” and “ray guns” instead of terrorists.
What is evidence here is “game theory warfare,” a subset of “chaos theory,” or for the “internet people,” the terms “psyop” of “disinfo” will have to do.
Thus, “fairy dust and finger pointing” has replaced real counter-intelligence and solid police work. Thus, Jonathan Kay is correct albeit the fact that Mr. Kay is, of course, one of those who is actively orchestrating the chaos.
Jonathan Kay, a Canadian born Israeli lobbyist, author of “Among the Truthers,” is noted for pointing out that the “9/11 Truth Movement” was thoroughly infiltrated with various agent provocateurs, “shills” and “plants,” along with some deeply flawed individuals.
Where Kay fails, though his writing, as an Israeli, betrays, through its childishly obvious agenda, Israeli complicity in 9/11. You see, Kay himself is a deeply flawed individual, not so bright, too obvious and a clear “red flag” denoting Mossad related tasking to “manage” clearly evident Israeli complicity in 9/11.
Anyone with intelligence experience knows that 9/11 helped only one country on earth, Israel. Were any real Muslim to have actually been involved, they would have had to have actually been more stupid than Kay, if such a thing is possible. (Which it is not.)
Over the past few years, we at Adamus have been running an informal study group, looking at 9/11, the theories, the signs of coverup, the infighting and infiltration that has become so obvious among the 9/11 truth movement. Recently we have noted that there seems to be an increase in telltale involvement of intelligence agencies operating inside “the movement,” tasked with turning any positive direction “inside out.”
Within the defense sector, we have an intelligence advisory group. Our staff and consultant resources includes:
- Top US Army and CIA intelligence professionals, two former members of the National Security Council and one former White House Intelligence Coordinator
- FBI counter-intelligence and counter-terrorism directors (former) and access to a America’s top nuclear weapons designer
- Pakistan: DG of ISI, Chairman of JCOS, Chairman of Army of Pakistan, Head of Strategic plans and others
- Britain: Scotland Yard Special Branch, MI 6, MI 5, SAS, multiple flag officers (with knighthoods)
- France: Director of a national police agency and one senior intelligence official
- South Africa: Director of an intelligence agency, multiple flag officers
- Russia: Several top intelligence officers, including the director of one agency (current) and a former “psyops” chief and one former nuclear security officer
- Serbia: Directors of the Army, Staff College and Director of “Psychological Operations”
- Israel: Multiple intelligence officers
- Nigeria: Chief of Security, Counter-Terrorism Chief
- Ghana: Chief of Intelligence
- India, Japan, China, Indonesia, Australia, Iraq, Afghanistan, Azerbaijan, Turkey, Greece, Cyrus, Jordan, Kenya and other nations
Analysis of the actual 9/11 event itself has been, or at least “had been,” relative acrimonious, not unlike the interactions of the “9/11 Truth” community. However, over the years, with tons of “hindsight,” there is a general agreement of “inside job” with a minority willing to mention Israel as an “actor” in the events.”
A very high percentage blame “Bush, Cheney and the neocons.”
Most of the Africans and some of the Israelis support the “box cutter/Arab hijacker” theory, most of the Israelis, not all.
THE COVER UP
This is where things become interesting. Intelligence professionals are never concerned with “how” something is done, only “who” and “why.” Thus, the discussions of “planes v. no planes” or “nanothermite v. nukes v. magic death rays” are seldom discussed.
There is virtually NO support for the 9/11 Commission report (even the 9/11 Commission didn’t support the 9/11 Commission report) or theories involving aircraft.
Consensus from those with “major powers” points toward “nuclear demolition” based on having, within the group,” several “nuclear weapons officers,” some with Cold War experience with “nuclear demolitions.” Questions involve advances in weapons design since the Reagan “Star Wars” or “SDI” (Strategic Defense Initiative). Were everyone to be put in a room and one were to postulate: “Some kind of fusion reaction was responsible,” there would be a majority of “nods.”
What is agreed upon is that, within the 9/11 Truth movement, some of those who assumed immediate positions of leadership lacked a “profile” for a “whistleblower” or “social activist.”
Many simply had no history of altruism or acting except out of self interest. Moreover, many with long ties to right wing extremism and “NWO” movements, claiming to have “awakened,” lacked any history of a “watershed event” that could be grasped onto. Without such a rationale, such as with Admiral Elmo Zumwalt, whose son died of Agent Orange poisoning, such “awakenings” of humanism or social responsibility are groundless and most often clear signs of a paid infiltrator.
Such individuals are easy to profile. They love attention and, in that they are secretly backed by powerful forces, manage to secure funding, access to mainstream press and periodically show up with “mysterious allies” who lack any sort of background.
A significant number of those involved in “9/11 Truth” profile as having “inadequate personalities” or “narcissistic personality disorders,” prime targets for intelligence agencies to seek out because of their need for recognition and their dependence on approval by those in position of perceived authority.
A critical issue in finding “shills” is profiling and psychological forensics of both materials and positions taken. Often writings will demonstrate “committee style.” A single article will have, not only different styles of writing, some using passive subjects, some active but more telling is cadence and vocabulary.
Worse still, many write on technical subjects where they have absolutely no background at all.
Assuming 9/11 involved a real conspiracy less convoluted than the one the 9/11 Commission was forced to certify was at the heart of the 9/11 event, what evidence exists that advanced planning was implemented to support endless hypotheticals that would lead to endless circuitous and meaningless debate?
The most striking support of this hypothesis is the event itself, the “dustification” or “vaporization” of up to three million tons of steel in less than one second.
Evidence is clear, this is the nature of the event in New York on 9/11. It is also clear that any potential “how” explanation could be and has been denied “out of hand” as what was observed was impossible given known technologies.
This leaves one available possibility. Unknown technologies were used.
Thus, we have the perfect block. We have an observable event that we know happened that simply could never have happened.
If this were the plan, and no other plan was possible, it would depend on two things:
- The news media would, not only have to be controlled but would be prepared to orchestrate a cover story in advance and
- Prepared alternative stories combined with pre-positioned “controlled opposition” conspiracy theorists would guarantee what has been observed, the wide “legal acceptance” of a childishly stupid explanation for an event that has led to a decade of war, millions dead and world financial collapse.
AS IT SITS
No group studying alternative theories involving 9/11 are working in an organized or cohesive way. Pet theories are used to try to sell books, intelligence agencies identified long ago because of their incompetence and “ham handedness” still send the “long exposed shills” to every meeting.
As old assets are burned out, new ones are introduced, even still.
Copyright Gordon Duff, all rights reserved, reproduction only with written permission
Posted by Gordon Duff, Senior Editor on January 22, 2013, With 0 Reads, Filed under Of Interest. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.