FACEBOOK
TWITTER
The New SAVAK in Pakistan
Who stands to gain from “sectarian violence”?
by Zahir Ebrahim, Project Humanbeingsfirst.org
(February 18, 2013) – The Pakistani intelligentsia occupying front row chairs in the news media, and Pakistan’s so called intellectuals in its proliferating think-tanks, along with the bleeding so called liberals and the revolutionary so called conservatives, and not to forget the multiplying secular humanists and various and sundry human rights groups; all full of it. At least in my never to be humble view.
None are calling, or able to call, the systematic shia killing perceptively, forget forensically.
Labels such as “genocide” to “ethnic cleansing” to “shia-phobia” are bandied about by the erudite analysts and Pakistani expats writing all over the world; and the shia mullahs in Pakistan are evidently harvesting huge audiences from the misfortunes of the dead and their grieving families; إِنَّا لِلّهِ وَإِنَّـا إِلَيْهِ رَاجِعونَ ; all blind to the geopolitical game being played in Pakistan with proxy service providers.
Yes, protesting these killings of the innocent is necessary; silence is a crime. But unless the game is understood, what the players are doing will never be understood – and therefore, never interdicted effectively in self-defence.
On the surface, the killing of the shias in Quetta, Baluchistan, appears entirely senseless. It is presented as the work of sectarian hatred by the odd terrorist and fanatic group who supposedly hate the shias.
Nothing can be further from truth. Mercenaries and assets do not hate. They follow handlers’ orders.
To understand what is transpiring in Pakistan, one must first journey to Iran of the 1970s when SAVAK roamed supreme and tyrannized Iranians, with an entirely predictable outcome — at least predictable for those at the RAND Corporation. The same strategy is being fomented by the various terrorist organizations in Pakistan. They are collectively, a replacement of SAVAK.
Just as the terrorist organization SAVAK was formed and trained by the CIA and worked for the Shahansha of Iran, the terrorist organizations operating in Pakistan, from Jundallah in Baluchistan targeting Iran, to its sister organizations (or itself) targeting Pakistanis with dumb jackasses being told to take the credit for killing the Shias in the name of religion, are trained by the same paymasters and work for those in charge of Pakistan affairs today. Some of them are the front faces duly elected, some wear uniforms, some turbans, some live abroad, and some remain occulted from the public eye. They all have the same master as Saddam Hussein and the Shahansha of Iran once did, and work in a compartmentalized and cellularized manner from each other towards a broader agenda about which each perhaps remains entirely clueless. Each is respectively led by the carrot of its own genius mind. The terrorists, organized in blue-teams and red-teams, also remain unaware of each others’ existence and do their assigned job. And part of that job is to divert attention to make it look sectarian and religious based.
This is the statecraft of modern warfare in the exercise of hegemony. There is not one general in the higher military echelons of Pakistan who can claim ignorance of these principles. Nor can the high-falutin defense analysts, the retired generals.
Yet, not once has Jundallah been mentioned by anyone in Pakistan in the targeted killing of the Shias in Quetta, and in the rest of Pakistan. The group’s name seemed to have been removed from media and military memory.
What the Shahansha’s SAVAK did, and what the West did to cultivate and protect the reaction to SAVAK’s excesses, finally bringing it to power on an Air France Jet Airliner that could have easily been blown out of existence in just the same way as Iranian passenger Airbus plane, Iran Air Flight 655, was shot down in Iranian waters in the Persian Gulf on July 3, 1988 by the U.S warship, the Vincennes, in a flagrant act of state-directed terrorism that killed 290 passengers on board; and yet “Revolutionary Islam” was brought to land safely after living through the safe-harbor in NATO controlled France, and that was after being deliberately evicted from Iraq by Saddam Hussein who also only marched to his master’s voice; all reproduced below in the retrospective on Iran.
Click on the links in the article Iran Today – Building Self Reliance Under Siege, study a little, analyze a little, and you shall perceptively begin to see the pattern of synthesis of “revolutionary Islam” — the best enemy no money can buy, but Islam provides for free to Machiavelli in the presence of Muslim sectarian cracks and lacunas, fifth columnists and mercenaries.
The Path Forward remains the same: Impacting Muslim Existence!
Source URL: http://bloghumanbeingsfirst.wordpress.com/2013/02/18/the-new-savak-in-pakistan-by-zahir-ebrahim/
Related Posts:
Short URL: http://www.veteranstoday.com/?p=239672
Posted by Kevin Barrett on Feb 19 2013, With 0 Reads, Filed under AfPak, Editor, WarZone. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
COMMENTS
To post, we ask that you login using Facebook, Yahoo, AOL, or Hotmail in the box below.Don't have a social network account? Register and Login direct with VT and post.
Before you post, read our Comment Policy - Feedback
Salem Aleikum, Nuha!
You must have misunderstood me, Nuha, I was asking HOW Christians would feel IF muslim Troops were stationed in Vatikan-City to point out how much of a shame it was by western governments to place non-muslim foreign troops on the muslim most HOLY LANDS, the land of Mecca and Medina!
But it was the Saudi royal dynasty who asked the US government, don’t forget that neither, please.
I demand tolerance, Nahu, and I demand Honesty and Honor from all MENSCHEN, doesn’t matter if Muslim, Jewish or Christian or Buddhist or Atheist.
You say that Your Religion respects Christians and Jews, yet, please tell me, did I lie when I said that it is forbidden to carry a BIBLE on the muslim most holy soil of Saudi-Arabia? Is it allowed to built CHURCHES in Saudi-Arabia? You have to know, Nahu, that I cannot accept hypocrisy and DOUBLE STANDARDS, what kind of men finance Mosque-Construction in foreign countries all around Europe, while forbidding Church-Buildings to be even renovated on theirs??? I tell You what kind of men practice such double standards: Liars and Extremists.
And I don’t watch FOX, Nahu, as I don’t buy the Left:Right/ REP:DEM-Propaganda nomore, but thank You for trying to discredit me with that.
@Brian, if You think there would be “unity” between Shia and Sunni if only the West wouldn’t interfere in the middle east or Israel never existed, You’re just absolutely mistaken.
I’m a true friend of the persian people, many intellectuals fled to my city after the Islamic revolution (which the stupid west brang about with it’s intermeddlings there even long before the Mossadeq-overthrowing), but it really makes more sense for IRAN than ISRAEL to cause iranian suffering like these latest attacks in Pakistan, but not everything in the world is abut conspiracy, manipulation and instigation of “foreign” secret powers…
I stand by it, we’re doing IRAN a grave injustice, it’s a stupid and contra-productive foreign policy with the sanctions.
@Brian, if You think there would be “unity” between Shia and Sunni if only the West wouldn’t interfere in the middle east or Israel never existed, You’re just absolutely mistaken.
Brian: I never said that. This what I wrote: The Israeli government doesn’t want Muslim unity, they prefer Muslims kill each other.
Perhaps behind the scenes the Mossad is orchestrating the killings of Shia. When you find terrorism in the Middle East the Mossad is most likely the #1 suspect. When you read about a bomb ripping through three buses killing Shia pilgrims think the Mossad. The Israeli government doesn’t want Muslim unity, they prefer Muslims kill each other.
Soon two of the world’s major terrorists Obama and Netanyauhu will have a meeting, they won’t be arrested, oh well.
Make no mistake, the hate and division between Sunnis and Shiites has nothing to do with western intermeddling nor Israel.
In total opposition to what the graphic above is insinuating, it’s Israel that is indeed providing Shiites and especially Irans Mullah leadership a pretense, moral support from the sunni streets for standing up against the “Enemies of Islam”. Assume that Israel wouldn’t exist, shiite Hisbollah and the shiite supporting alevite Assads of Syria would long have been obliterated by sunni supremacists. Indeed Israel and the West is responsible to a large extend for creating support and followership for islamic fundamentalist rebirth and uprising since our greed for oil of the middle east, but the sunni-shia conflict goes back to the 8th century A.D. with the Battle of Karbala, and in reality the Iranians fear the sunni majority even more than the supposed “Satans” USA and Israel.
If there was no USA and Israel, the Shia, Sunni, Ahmadyya, Sufi and all the other islamic splinter sects would be at war with eachother now openly. There shall be no love lost for a christian or humanist or any other non-muslim for Islam as it’s a harsh intolerant ideology in it’s ancient core-belief-system of dar-al-Islam and dar-al-Harb, it’s ideas of subjugation, Dhimmitude, Infidel, Taqiyya, Kitman and especially Sharia.
As Robert Spencer once put it, only a bad muslim is a good muslim, the real good muslims being able to fully accept and tolerate non-muslims as equal human beings would be the Alevites who supported the modernization and secularization of Attatuerks modern Turkey which is right now being thrown back into repressive anti-humanist times by the sunni islamist Erdogan.
There are very many moderate and secular fine muslims of course, but for a staunch believer in the teachings of the Quran/Hadiths, they would be labeled Heretics.
“We” support SAUDI-ARABIA. A country that has NO christian or jewish citizen or any citizen of any other confession but Islam, a country where to possess a BIBLE is severely punished and that oppresses it’s shiite minority and helps Bahrain to oppress their shiite majority even, all with the military help of “us”.
Something is indeed grossly rotten to the core with European/ US foreign policy towards Iran, as well as Pakistan or Saudi-Arabia, but to just claim some outside non-islamic interest-group would be pushing for islamic sectarianism isn’t good enough to explain the divisions.
Iran is pushed so hard into the corner, it seems to me, that all her options left are to inflame shiite uprisings in Pakistan, Iraq and Gulfcoast-states like in Bahrain, as well as fully supporting the Assad-Regime in Syria of course…
The great and sophisticated people of Iran don’t deserve their Mullah-Regime, but they are pushed standing behind their leaders as good Patriots do when outside aggressors – us – threaten and strangle their country.
The elephant in the room is Saudi-Arabia.