Annunaki, Iraq & Pearl Harbor

by Dean Henderson


(Excerpted from Chapter 12: The Gulf Oil War, Big Oil & Their Bankers…)

The process of stealing Iraq’s oil began when the Illuminati bankers baited Saddam Hussein into invading Iran. While Saddam was preoccupied with the Iranians, the puppet Kuwaiti government busied itself slowly moving its long-disputed border with Iraq northward into the area containing the massive Rumaila oilfield, which the Four Horsemen now knew to be one of the richest in the world.

There the Kuwaitis established military installations, farms and oil facilities.  The expansion added 900 square miles to Kuwait and gave them control over the southern portion of Rumaila, which contains the largest portion of its estimated 30 billion barrels of oil.  Iraq’s oil terminal at Fao was destroyed during the Iran/Iraq War, crippling Iraqi National Oil Company (INOC) production at North Rumaila.  Iraq wanted to lease the islands of Warbah and Bubiyan from Kuwait to serve as deep sea ports that could replace Fao.  The Kuwaitis refused.

In 1981 the Kuwait Oil Company (KOC) bought Sante Fe Drilling Corporation and its high-tech engineering subsidiary Braun.  Sante Fe was a known CIA front. Braun had devised a new slant drilling technique.  Throughout the 1980’s KOC used this technology to drill horizontally into the Rumaila oilfield, 90% of which fell within Iraqi territory. [1]  The Iraqis said Kuwait stole $10 billion worth of crude oil.

After the Gulf War, Sante Fe continued to steal Iraqi oil. In April 1993 Kenneth Beaty, head of exploration for Sante Fe, was arrested by the Iraqi government when he was found inside Iraq checking an oil well at Rumaila.  He was sentenced to eight years at Abu Ghraib prison on trespassing charges. [2]

Estimates of Iraqi crude reserves continue to climb.  The current estimate is 112 billion barrels, second only to Saudi Arabia and up from 97 billion barrels just a decade ago.  And much of Iraq remains unexplored.  David Mangan Jr., editor of The Oil Daily, later said of the Gulf War, “It is most likely that the US plan from the beginning was to capture Southern Iraq because that land holds the richest oil fields on earth.”

But Iraq contains something more important than oil. Rumaila lies at the heart of what was Mesopotamia, between the Tigres and Euphrates Rivers that drain into the Persian Gulf.  The world’s most ancient writings are etched on Sumerian clay tablets buried beneath the muck at the estuaries of these great rivers.  During biblical times the area was known as Chaldea.  It was here, Anunnaki researchers say, where the Nubirian intruders chose to land, due to its plentiful supply of fossil fuels.

According to foremost Anunnaki researcher Zecharia Sitchin, the Anunnaki constructed the Great Pyramids in Egypt as space beacons.  NASA scientist Maurice Chatelain agrees, stating, “The Great Pyramid at Cheops was also a space beacon.  From high above, the pyramid is visible at a very great distance…the polished stone surface is a radar reflector.”  The Anunnaki landing facilities may have been in the Sinai Peninsula. 

Sinai means “shining” and, derived from name of the Babylonian god “Sin”.  Sin was the Semetic name for Nannar, the firstborn son of Anunnaki leader Enlil, who was the sovereign of Ur, the home city of Ancient Mystery purveyor and possible Anunnaki hybrid Abraham.  Sin was also the Chaldean name for the moon where, according to Sumerian tablets, the Anunnaki obtained the needed DNA for their human hybrid experiments.  This adds a whole new meaning to the Old Testament mantra that man was born in sin. [3]

“The Great Pyramid at Cheops was also a space beacon.  From high above, the pyramid is visible at a very great distance…the polished stone surface is a radar reflector.”  NASA scientist Maurice Chatelain

Researchers claim the Egyptian King Ra was actually Marduk, son of Anunnaki commander Enki.  Ra fathered Shu and Tefnut, who married each other and gave birth to Geg and Nut.  They too married and spawned the Egyptian god-kings Isis and Osirus, along with the biblical Seth and Nephtys.  The Anunnaki flight control center was at Mount Moriah, which translates “mount of directing”. [4]

It was on this exact sight that King Solomon built his Temple, under which the Knights Templar excavated during the Crusades, making off with boatloads of gold, the Ark of the Covenant (possibly an Anunnaki radio transmitting device) and other sacred relics now guarded by the Priory of Sion.

This southern portion of Iraq may contain valuable clues as to the origins of mankind, knowledge closely guarded by the Illuminati banker-led secret societies.  The perpetual state of war with Iraq has put the area off limits to researchers, just as the number of people interested in the Anunnaki theories gains critical mass. When US forces invaded Iraq in 2003, organized “looters” carried away many important artifacts from Iraq’s National Museum.

In June 1990 Iraq’s Ambassador to the US, Mohammed al-Mashat, appeared on CNN revealing US/Kuwaiti collaboration in destabilizing Iraq’s economy.  Al-Mashat stated, “I have documents written by the CIA, detailing an economic destabilization program against Iraq involving Kuwaiti State Security.  On November 14, 1989 CIA Director William Webster invited KSS officials to Washington to plan this destabilization effort.” [5]

Al-Mashat read verbatim from the CIA document, which stated, “It is important to take advantage of the deteriorating economic situation in Iraq in order to put pressure on Iraq to delineate border situation.  Broad cooperation should be initiated between us.  The CIA will also train 128 elite Kuwaiti forces to protect the al-Sabah family.  And we will help automate functions of the State Security Department and facilitate the exchange of information with Syria and Iran.” [6] 

Al-Mashat went on to say that Kuwait’s oil wealth was being deployed to bankroll mujahedeen rebel heroin trafficking in the Golden Crescent region.  Just months before Mashat made this claim, a nephew of Kuwaiti emir Sheik Jaber Ahmed al-Sabah was arrested in France for possession of heroin.

Part of the CIA/al-Sabah destabilization effort against Iraq involved driving world oil prices lower.  At a May 1990 Arab Summit in Baghdad, Saddam Hussein said that for every $1 drop in the price of a barrel of oil Iraq was losing $1 billion/year.  He called Kuwaiti overproduction of crude an “act of war”.  Two months later he lodged a formal complaint with the Arab League calling Kuwait and UAE “imperialist agents” in the Gulf.  King Hussein of Jordan concurred.  In July 1990 OPEC held a meeting of oil ministers in Vienna where it was agreed that each member nation would lower production to avert further declines in an already weak oil market.

A day after the meeting Kuwait announced that it had changed its mind and would increase production.  KOC flooded an already oversupplied market with $13.25/barrel Kuwaiti Export crude.  The UAE followed suit.  Within three months Iraqi crude went from $28/barrel to $11, resulting in a loss of $14 billion in oil revenues.  Iraq’s economy is oil-dependent. In 1988 oil provided 99.1% of Iraq’s hard currency. [7] Reeling under mountains of Iranian War debt, Iraq was now starved of the desperately needed foreign exchange required to service this debt and rebuild its shattered economy.

Iraqi Foreign Minister Tariq Aziz penned a letter to the Secretary General of the League of Arab States complaining that Kuwait had, “implemented a plot to escalate the pace of the gradual, systematic advance toward Iraqi territory.  The Kuwaiti government set up military installations, police posts, oil installations and farms on Iraqi territory”.

But Aziz knew that a more powerful force stood squarely behind Kuwait’s audacious moves, stating, “We are sure that some Arab states are involved in a conspiracy against us.  And we want you to know that our country will not kneel and our women will not become prostitutes and our children will not be barred from food.  It is inconceivable that a regime such as that in Kuwait could risk engaging in a conspiracy of such a magnitude against a large, strong country such as Iraq if it were not being supported by a great power, and that power is the United States of America”.

“It is important to take advantage of the deteriorating economic situation in Iraq in order to put pressure on Iraq to delineate border situation.  Broad cooperation should be initiated between us.  The CIA will also train 128 elite Kuwaiti forces to protect the al-Sabah family.  And we will help automate functions of the State Security Department and facilitate the exchange of information with Syria and Iran.” [6] 

While Iraq’s greatest oilfield was being partitioned by the Four Horsemen and their Kuwaiti surrogates, the al-Sabah fiefdom was driving the price of oil into the ground, while demanding full repayment of the Iraq “grants”.  In July 1990, as American warships conducted exercises in the Persian Gulf, Iraqi President Hussein met in Baghdad with US Ambassador to Iraq April Glaspie.  Saddam registered his anger towards Kuwait’s economic warfare against Iraq.  He told Glaspie he was considering taking military action against Kuwait to drive them out of the Rumaila oilfield.

Glaspie said nothing to discourage Saddam, instead telling him, “We have no position regarding Arab/Arab conflicts”.  On July 31 Assistant Secretary of State John Kelly gave his implicit blessing to Saddam’s plans saying, “We have no defense treaty relationship with any Gulf country.  That is clear…we have historically avoided taking a position on border disputes”.

Glaspie and Kelly were both lying and giving Saddam the green light to attack Kuwait.  A few days later Iraqi Revolutionary Guards routed the Kuwaiti’s from Rumaila.  Both a letter penned by President Bush to Saddam on July 28 and State Department instructions to Glaspie were withheld from a Senate committee investigating Glaspie’s and Kelly’s odd responses to Iraqi threats.  State Department spokesman Richard Boucher said the documents were withheld to “permit Presidents and foreign leaders to talk freely”.

Watch them All Die

It wasn’t the first time a US President allowed bloodshed to provide a pretext for economically beneficial war, nor would it be the last.  Bush’s “no response” to Saddam was reminiscent of the actions of FDR which led to the Japanese bombing of Pearl Harbor and US entry into WWII.

A 1940 Gallup poll showed 83% of Americans were against US involvement in the war.  The London banker crowd wanted US intervention to help cement the US/Britain “special relationship”, which serves as the neo-colonial paradigm of the day.  FDR was himself a Wall Street insider. He only launched his populist New Deal to put a lid on revolutionary public anger caused by the Crash of 1929.  His uncle Frederic Delano was a member of the first Federal Reserve Board.  The 33rd Degree Mason and CFR insider needed a pretext to provide US troops for the defense of European monarchs, to which every Mason pledges his allegiance, wittingly or not.

CFR started the ball rolling by encouraging FDR to send aid to China and to squeeze Japanese trade via naval blockades.  FDR ordered the Pacific Fleet moved to vulnerable Pearl Harbor despite numerous intelligence reports of looming Japanese aggression and over the objections of Admiral James Richardson.

In 1932 and 1938 the Navy conducted exercises in the presence of Japanese military attachés, simulating the destruction of the Pacific Fleet at Pearl Harbor.  Six Japanese aircraft carriers disappeared from radar after seen sailing towards the US.  US Army Chief of Staff George Marshall sent an ambiguous message to Pearl Harbor military commanders on November 27, 1941 that read, “Hostile action possible at any moment.  If hostilities cannot be avoided the US desires that Japan commit the first overt act.” [8]

Warnings came from FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover, US Ambassador to Japan Joseph Grew, Brigadier General Elliot Thorpe in Java, and British and Dutch intelligence.  On December 6th, US intelligence told Roosevelt that the Japanese carriers were 400 miles from Hawaii.  Still, Roosevelt left most of the Pacific Fleet in port.  On the night of December 6th, George Marshall and Navy Secretary Frank Knox huddled at the White House with FDR.  Both later testified that they “did not recall their whereabouts”.

While battleships and destroyers remained at Pearl Harbor, the more strategic aircraft carriers were moved. Not one was in Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941.  FDR knew air power was the key to defeating Japan.  The “surprise” Japanese attack went forward and 2,400 Americans paid for the FDR deception with their lives.  Another 1,200 were injured.  The next day FDR addressed the nation and called for a declaration of war.  Pearl Harbor ended US isolationism once and for all.

FDR stated his position in a trans-Atlantic telephone conversation with British Prime Minister and fellow 33rd Degree Freemason Winston Churchill, stating, “A Japanese attack on us, which would result in war…would certainly fulfill two of the most important requirements of our policy…What I don’t know, can’t hurt me”. [9]

As Professor Stuart Crane put it, “If you look back at every war in Europe you will see that they always ended up with the establishment of a balance of power.  With every reshuffling there was a balance of power in a new grouping around the House of Rothschild in England, France or Austria.  They grouped nations so that if any King got out of line, a war would break out and the war would be decided by which way the financing went.  Researching the debt positions of warring nations will usually indicate who was being punished.”

In 1939, North Dakota Senator Gerald Nye drew the nation’s attention to a document titled The Next War, which stated, “To persuade her (America) to take part will be much more difficult.  It will need a definite threat to America…The position will be naturally eased if Japan were involved…the old goddess of democracy routine”.  FDR’s son-in-law Curtis Dall said of the powers looming behind FDR, “For a long time I felt that he…developed many thoughts and ideas that were his own to benefit this country.  But he didn’t.  Most of his thoughts were carefully manufactured for him by the Council on Foreign Relations-One World Money group.” [10]

As Professor Stuart Crane put it, “If you look back at every war in Europe you will see that they always ended up with the establishment of a balance of power.  With every reshuffling there was a balance of power in a new grouping around the House of Rothschild in England, France or Austria.  They grouped nations so that if any King got out of line, a war would break out and the war would be decided by which way the financing went.  Researching the debt positions of warring nations will usually indicate who was being punished.”

The international bankers now prepared to punish Iraq.  Shortly after Iraq attacked Kuwait Jordan’s King Hussein joined with Algerian President Chadli Benjladid to organize an Arab League Summit in Algiers to try and head off a full-scale war.  Saddam agreed to pull his troops from Kuwait while the summit proceeded. But Egypt, with backing from the US and Britain, convinced 14 of the 21 foreign ministers in attendance to denounce Iraq. The peace effort fell apart.  The Bilderbergers would have their bloodbath.

On October 5, 1990 Iraq’s Ambassador to the UN Sabah Talat Kadrat stated to the General Assembly, “America and its Western allies are seeking, through this military, political and informational campaign; to gain control over the oil wells and to impose imperialist political, economic and military hegemony over the world, and over the Third World countries in particular.”

Dean Henderson is the author of four books: Big Oil & Their Bankers in the Persian Gulf: Four Horsemen, Eight Families & Their Global Intelligence, Narcotics & Terror Network, The Grateful Unrich: Revolution in 50 Countries, Stickin’ it to the Matrix and Das Kartell der Federal Reserve. To subscribe to Dean’s weekly blog, Left Hook, go to www.deanhenderson.wordpress.com


    • Footnotes;
    • [1] Iraq and Kuwait: A History Suppressed. Ralph Schoenman. Veritas Press. Santa Barbara. 1990.
    • [2] “US Should Appeal for Sooner’s Release”. AP. Tulsa World. 7-3-93. p.A4
    • [3] The Wars of God and Men. Zecharia Sitchin. Avon Books. New York. 1985
    • [4] Ibid
    • [5] CNN Headline News. 6-26-90
    • [6] Ibid
    • [7] OPEC Annual Report. General Secretariat. Vienna, Austria. 1989. p.8
    • [8] Marrs. p.174
    • [9] Ibid. p.176
    • [10] Ibid. p.173

Dean Henderson

Dean Henderson was born and raised on a cattle ranch near Faulkton, SD. He earned a BLS from the University of South Dakota in 1987 and an MS in Environmental Studies from the University of Montana in 1991. He founded/published/edited one of America's first political "zines" - The Missoula Paper - in 1990 in Missoula, MT - where he was also a regular columnist for the Montana Kaimin.

His Left Hook columns have appeared on Infowars, Globalresearch.ca, David Icke, Jeff Rense and other websites. His print articles have appeared in Multinational Monitor, In These Times, Paranoia and several other journals.

A self-described revolutionary and traveler to 50 countries, Dean co-founded of the U. of Montana Green Party and Ozark Heritage Region Peace & Justice Network. He was Vice-President of the Central Ozarks Farmer's Union and former President of the Howell County Democrats. In 2004 he won the Democratic nomination for Congress in Missouri's 8th District. He has authored four books.

His first book, Big Oil and Their Bankers in the Persian Gulf: Four Horsemen, Eight Families and Their Global Intelligence, Narcotics and Terror Network (www.createspace.com/3476183), has become a global cult classic among conspiracy researchers.

His second book, The Grateful Unrich: Revolution in 50 Countries, chronicles insights gained from a lifetime of overseas travel.

His third book, Das Kartell der Federal Reserve: Acht Familien beherrschen die Welt, is published is German language by Kopp Verlag. This is Chapter 19: The Eight Families of his Big Oil... book.

His latest book, Stickin' it to the Matrix, is a practical guide to dropping out of the evil Illuminati system and kicking it in the nuts!

He and his wife Jill are back in the US after an 11-month journey through South Africa, Swaziland, Lesotho, Botswana, Zimbabwe, Nepal, Thailand, Malaysia and Laos. They currently reside on an increasingly self-sufficient homestead in the southern Missouri Ozarks.

Latest posts by Dean Henderson (see all)

Related Posts:

The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT or any other VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors or partners and technicians. Notices

Posted by on 9:14 am, With 0 Reads, Filed under Of Interest. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Comments Closed

27 Responses to "Annunaki, Iraq & Pearl Harbor"

  1. LC  April 6, 2013 at 9:35 pm

    WHEN you search for “PLANETS” in QURON.COM the following page comes up:


    The second verse is:

    “When Joseph said unto his father: O my father! Lo! I saw in a dream eleven planets and the sun and the moon, I saw them prostrating themselves unto me.”

    I assume if you add the EARTH to the above 11 planets and get 12 PLANETS that may be the number today’s scientist are beating the bushes to confirm!!!
    Although the above verse may mean a total of 11 planets??? That’s a good question to ask Dr. Kevin Barrett.

    NOTE: the above writings haven’t change since 1400+ years ago!!!

  2. LC  April 5, 2013 at 8:56 am

    B R A V O Dean Henderson:

    Acknowledging Professor Stuart Crane’s quote above from the MOTHER OF GREAT SATANS:

    1849: Gutle Schnaper, Mayer Amschel Rothschild’s wife dies. Before her death she would nonchalantly state,


    The History of the House of Rothschild
    by Andrew Hitchcock

    • Dean Henderson  April 5, 2013 at 11:43 am

      Thanks LC!

  3. Not Clueless  April 3, 2013 at 9:35 am

    @Franklin Ryckaert
    Wondering if you even bothered to watch any of the Mauro Biglino video much less the entire presentation. From the video (quoting the provided English translation):

    “At the time when most of the Bible’s events happened, above all the fundamental ones, Hebrew didn’t exist as a language. When many names were pronounced, Hebrew didn’t exist, Moses didn’t speak Hebrew. In the desert, they didn’t speak Jewish during the Exodus. If we like, if we want to believe they spoke some sort of semitic language but I doubt it, they spoke some form of Amorite, then maybe they began to speak some form of Aramaic. And later, a couple of centuries later, Jewish began to shape, which is actually a transformed Sub-Phoenician.” Biglino goes on to say of RUACH: “…because this word isn’t Jewish but of Sumerian origin. That is the pictogram made by those that saw the first RUACH, which is where the RUACH of the Hebrews came from.” These are statements made by an official Vatican translater whose translations of the literal meanings of the Leningrad Codex created the realization that many of the stories this book tells were mistranslated, misinterpretated, mostly on purpose, in order to insert the notion of a spiritual, almighty and unerring God. Because of these revelations, the Vatican suspended all further publications of Biglino’s works. Interesting that in part 2 Biglino details that Elohim is plural and speaks of TSELEM, derived from the verb TSALAM, which means “to cut out of”.

    “… the Bible tells us that we’ve been made using Elohims’ TSELEM. […] Actually, the Bible says that we are made after the likeness but with something that contains Elohims’ image.” So what could be cut out of something else that would contain the properties of ‘image’ – genes/DNA. “With any probability, this biblical tale is the summary of the sumerian tablets tale in particular in the “Enuma Elish”, that is when Sumerians tell about the beginning but where Sumerians are much more precise than the Bible because Sumerians, who never thought of creating a religion. Never, they never build a temple, they never talked of Gods, the way we mean it but they spoke about of those guys Biagio Russo talked very well about before. They certainly respected these people. They were afraid of them, because obviously, as you can understand, those guys were much more powerful, from the point of view of knowledge and technology but they didn’t consider them to be Gods, as they have been indicate afterwards.” The Sumerians knew those weren’t unerring gods and they hadn’t any scruples about telling of their failures. Their genetic experiments went wrong repeatedly “before achieving the right slave.” Biglino goes on to say “These translations i brought you are not from Sitchen.[…] Regarding Sumerology, I follow the translations made by academics. Those are the translations by Giovanni Pettinato, who is a worldwide authority…[now deceased][…] Incidentally, he was the chairman of the European commission for the creation of a Sumerian dictionary, hence an undisputed worldwide authority.”

    The Sumerian tale compared to the Bible tale: “Now, I don’t know if some genetists or biologists are present here. Everybody knows the importance of clay as a catalyst for the precesses of combination of the nucleic acids, thus DNA and RNA […] God portrayed as a potter, is not a mythical tale at all.[…] While the first story tells us of that we’ve been made with Elohims’ TSELEM thus with Elohims’ DNA, the second tale tells us the Elohims’ acted on the AFAR, thus on the dust, on the clay that there was here on Earth and this has two meanings because AFAR comes from the accadian TIKIT that indicates both clay and what contains the form because clay is something which can assume and contain a form. It means that this second tale is seen from the point of view of the hominide DNA which was present here on Earth so, we’ve been made with Elohims’ TSELEM that has been inserted into the AFAR, which is what contains the form and was already present here on Earth, thus the hominide DNA. […] The two tales, which were traditionally considered separately,[…], they tell the same story as seen from both sides. There is no contradiction, on the contrary, there is completion.”

    Based on your other comment and what I have discovered through my own research, your opinions/assertions simply do not ring true. And it’s a complete waste of time/energy to attempt to enllighten those who do not have “eyes to see or ears to hear”. As to your contention that Carl Sagan debunked Velikovsky (from _http://www.velikovskian.com/sagan.htm):

    “Having read Velikovsky, I also read Sagan’s paper; I thereafter discovered that a group of scientists and scholars had written critiques of Sagan’s analysis. After reading these criticisms I began a search of the literature and over a period of time I became convinced that Sagan’s critique lacked substance. Most surprising was the number of statements made by Sagan that proved to be clearly untrue. Further reading reinforced this discovery of the glaringly unscientific and unscholarly quality of Sagan’s paper. What was much worse, was that it was difficult to imagine that even Sagan was unaware of the misrepresentation of evidence presented as scholarly criticism by him and offered to the public.”

    Are the conclusions of Sitchen, Von Daeniken, Velikovsky 100% correct? I don’t believe they are – but certainly important parts of the puzzle are revealed. There is way too much evidence from way too many sources to dismiss the idea that “skygods” have been and continue to be an intrusive, controlling, and most importantly, a predatory part of human existence.

    • Franklin Ryckaert  April 3, 2013 at 11:45 am

      “At that time when most of the Bible’s events happened, above all the fundamental ones, Hebrew didn’t exist as a language.”

      Hebrew is part of the Canaanite group of Semitic languages to which also Phoenician (Ugaritic) and Moabitic belong. The oldest testimonies of Canaanitic are some glosses in South Canaanitic from the 14th century B.C and Phoenician (Ugaritic) from the 14-12th century B.C. It is not known what language the patriarchs Abraham, Isaac and Jacob (if they were real persons) spoke (probably a kind of Aramaic), but their descendants must have adopted Hebrew from the local inhabitants of Canaan since they were there a small minority anyway.The oldest texts of the Hebrew Bible stems from about 1000 B.C. The stories about the creation, the flood, the tower of Babel etc. were adopted (and transformed) by the Jews during their Babylonian exile in the 6th century B.C., when they already spoke Hebrew for centuries. It is very unlikely that they had no own word for the concept wind-breath-spirit and had to borrow it from Sumerian, the more so because cognates of Hebrew ruach also exist in Aramaic and Arabic, languages that had even less reason to borrow from Sumerian. Sumerian BTW was at that time already a dead language for centuries.

      As for tselem meaning DNA, an image is something you “cut out” (from stone or wood) so there is no surprise that the word for image,tselem is derived from the verbal root “to cut out”,tsalam. It is pretty far fetched to conclude that it therefore must mean DNA.

      Elohim is indeed a plural form but is definite singular in meaning when it denotes the One God of Israel. In that case verbs and adjectives associated with it are in the singular. The plural form Elohim probably has to be seen as a pluralis meiestatis or an indication of an abstraction (“the deity”). There is no reason to see this as an indication of “alien astronauts”.

    • Dean Henderson  April 3, 2013 at 1:47 pm

      Thanks to everyone for the great conversation we’re having. Noone knows about this stuff for sure. If they tell you they do…run away. I am learning a great deal from you all…

    • EdwardD425  April 9, 2013 at 6:53 pm

      Franklin Ryckaert you are an ignorant troll.

  4. Not Clueless  April 2, 2013 at 10:39 pm

    Z. Sitchen writes: The Mesopotamian texts that refer to the inner enclosures of temples, or to the heavenly journeys of the gods, or even to instances where mortals ascended to the heavens, employ the Sumerian term mu or its Semitic derivatives shu-mu (“that which is a mu”), sham, or shem. Because the term also connoted “that by which one is remembered,” the word has come to be taken as meaning “name.” But the universal application of “name” to early texts that spoke of an object used in flying has obscured the true meaning of the ancient records. Thus G.A. Barton (The Royal Inscriptions of Sumer and Akkad) established the unchallenged translation of Gudea’s temple inscription – that “Its MU shall hug the lands from horizon to horizon” – that “Its name shall fill the lands.” A hymn to Ishkur, extolling his “ray-emitting MU” that could attain the heights of Heaven, was likewise rendered: “Thy name is radiant, it reaches Heaven’s zenith.” Sensing, however, that mu or shem may mean an object and not “name,” some scholars have treated the term as a suffix or grammatical phenomenon not requiring translation and have thereby avoided the issue altogether. It is not too difficult to trace the etymology of the term, and the route by which the “sky chamber” assumed the meaning of “name.” Sculptures have been found that show a god inside a rocket-shaped chamber, as in this object of extreme antiquity […] where the celestial nature of the chamber is attested by the twelve gloves decorating it. Many seals similarly depict a god (and sometimes two) within such oval “divine chambers”; in most instances these gods within their sacred ovals were depicted as objects of veneration. …The ancient peoples developed the custom of setting up imitations of the god within his divine “sky chamber.” Stone pillars shaped to simulate the oval vehicle were erected at selected sites… That the purpose of the commemorative stone pillars was to simulate a fiery skyship can further be gleaned from the term by which such stone stelae were known in antiquity. The Sumerians called then NA.RU (“stones that rise”). The Akkadians, Babylonians, and Assyrians called them naru (“objects that give off light”). The Amurru called them nuras (“fiery objects” – in Hebrew, ner still means a pillar that emits light…). “The 12th Planet, ” Avon Books, New York, 1978. So, we see where Sitchin is going: a shem is a rocket ship.[…]

    Mauro Biglino: Unexpected Bible

    Mauro Biglino translated 23 books of the Bible for the Vatican. He had to translate the Leningrad Codex (the version of the Bible which all three major monotheistic religions – Christian, Jewish and Muslim – recognize as the official Bible) from the Hebrew, word by word, literally and with no interpretation whatsoever.

    In part 1 of 6 at 10:00 Biglino talks about the Elohims’ RUACH – and he draws a sketch that represents RUACH in the Sumerian pictograms (and the source of the Hebrew RUACH). What comes to mind upon viewing the sketch? RUACH is not Jewish but of Sumerian origin. He goes on to say that RUACH means wind or anything flying in the air quickly and causing wind – it does not mean spirit. The meaning refers to something that hovers on the water as in the typical way of flying by rapacious birds – carried by the wind without moving their wings. The Vatican inserted the terms “navis sideralis” which means “starship”, “aeria navis” which means “airship”, “aereus viator” which means “astronaut”, and the acronym “R.I.V.” for “res inexplicatae volantes” or UFOs. What the Hebrews described as RUACH and the Sumerians depicted graphically as RUACH was undoubtedly referring to the same thing.

    All 6 parts are extremely revealing especially part 4 which indicates the ‘gods’ are not immortal but can and do die – as well as part 6 which indicates that in the last book of the Bible, the book of Wisdom containing all of god’s knowledge, there is no mention of Jesus – son of god/died & resurrected/bringer of salvation – despite being written 15 years after Jesus’ death and presumed ascension. “Hard stuff, eh?”

    • Franklin Ryckaert  April 3, 2013 at 5:24 am

      The Hebrew word ruach is not of Sumerian origin. It is a common Semitic word. The cognate in Arabic is ruh and in Aramaic ruha. The development of the meaning from “wind” via “breath” to “spirit” is common in many languages of the world. No “flying objects” or “starships” are involved. Unless of course you are a fantast.

    • EdwardD425  April 9, 2013 at 6:55 pm

      Another numb nuts response by a Zionist troll.

  5. Tom D.  April 2, 2013 at 8:33 pm

    I suggest reading John Lamb Lash’s work or finding him on you tube. He presents an interesting take on this from the Gnositc Nag Hammadi Library texts. Thank you Mr Henderson,again!

    • Dean Henderson  April 3, 2013 at 6:38 am

      Thanks Tom!

  6. Martin Maloney  April 2, 2013 at 3:56 pm

    “It was on this exact sight (sic) that King Solomon built his Temple, under which the Knights Templar excavated during the Crusades, making off with boatloads of gold, the Ark of the Covenant (possibly an Anunnaki radio transmitting device) and other sacred relics now guarded by the Priory of Sion.”

    Please cite some archeological evidence that the fabled “Temple of Solomon” ever existed.

  7. nofolalo  April 2, 2013 at 3:03 pm

    “We have seen it for over 60 years, if the trail leads to Tel Aviv, it must have been “little green men.”
    Gordon Duff: ****http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/04/01/horror-in-israel-30000-mossad-spies-exposed/

  8. boonie rat 70  April 2, 2013 at 2:36 pm

    Henderson, the go between for the Japanese and the USA plan for Pearl Harbor was Thomas Mitose . Any and all who have attempted to research or write about it have been dissuaded in a most abrupt manner . Perhaps your journalistic skills may prove to be the right approach .

  9. John G.  April 2, 2013 at 12:04 pm

    JS, there is lots of mainstream, credible evidence for ETs. ‘Proof of Heaven’ was released last October, written by a Harvard neurosurgeon, in which he detailed what he saw — lots of ETs — during a week long coma, in which he was clinically brain dead. ‘Life Before Life’ was written by a U. of Virginia psychiatrist who summarized the findings of 2,500 cases of reports of reincarnation, and the incredible, unknowable details that make the reports believable. ‘Fingerprints of the Gods’ lays out the incredible parallels between the ancient cultures (and buildings) of Egypt, South America, and Mexico, from thousands of years before Westerners ‘discovered’ them. No way were the main pyramids of Egypt and Mexico built by ordinary humans.

    Two years ago, I knew nothing about ETs. After reading lots of books and reports, I am a firm believer in them. Many ETs are nothing but advanced stage humans.

    • Yehuda_Abraham  April 2, 2013 at 12:48 pm

      Correct. Anyone who thinks a bunch of desert dwellers clothed in white bedsheets and open-toed sandals, who were so primitive they would consider an electric toaster to be magic built those structures either hasn’t built anything in his entire life or is ridiculously gullible.

      It is still impossible today to drill an 8″x 4″ rectangular opening on a perfect 52o angle through 250+ feet of solid limestone. Anyone that thinks they can, please let me know. Then we can talk about Balbec and Puma Punka.

  10. JS  April 2, 2013 at 11:25 am

    I’ve been enjoying the excerpts from the book. Very good, very detailed. But this stuff about Zecharia Sitchin and extraterrestrial beings is ridiculous. Gimme a break. He stole some ideas from Erich von Daniken, who was equally loony-tunes. And both of them stole wholesale from Immanuel Velikovsky, who was a righteous dude and a great Renaissance man/scientist/doctor/historian who did NOT believe in ET beings.

    Sitchin and von Daniken made a lot of money with their flaky ideas, I’ll admit. But I am more concerned about WHO they were working for.

    • DaveE  April 2, 2013 at 12:03 pm

      You’re absolutely right, the problem is what they believe, not where they came from (or didn’t come from).

    • Franklin Ryckaert  April 3, 2013 at 5:01 am

      Von Daeniken and Sitchin are known frauds. For von Daeniken see : John T. Omohundro : Von Daeniken’s Chariots : a primer in the art of cooked science.(1976). For Sitchin see : Sitchin is wrong.com. Sitchin doesn’t even know that Sumerian is not a Semitic language, and yet he dares to “translate” from it. Velikovsky has sufficiently been debunked by Carl Sagan in Broca’s Brain (1979), Chapter 7: “Venus and Dr Velikovsky”. These pseudo-scientists are only taken seriously by the ignorant.

    • EdwardD425  April 9, 2013 at 6:57 pm

      Really? Consider your sources you Zionist troll. You have no basis and no facts for your assertions. Have you ever researched anything on your own?

  11. DaveE  April 2, 2013 at 10:41 am

    I have a theory that “the mark of the beast”, the number 666, may refer to the frequency of an electromagnetic field which causes the Annunaki to reveal their true form, a sort of shape-shifter jamming frequency. Basically f&^%s with the refresh-rate of the image they project to the outside world.

    If anyone captures a live Annunaki or suspected one, it’s an easy experiment to try. All you need is a big coil of wire, an audio power amplifier and an audio oscillator set to 666 Hz.

    Let me know what you find out…….!

    • JS  April 2, 2013 at 11:29 am

      Very funny!

You must be logged in to post a comment Login