The JFK War: Hany Farid, Jefferson Morley and the Zapruder film

by Jim Fetzer


How can Jefferson Morley pretend to be an expert on the assassination of JFK when he is abysmally ignorant about it?“–Jim Fetzer

Hany Farid

Hany Farid

We are encountering the most massive disinformation in American history as the 50th observance of the assassination of JFK approaches.   Long discredited theories–such as that a Secret Service man accidentally shot JFK with his AR-15, that Jackie shot JFK with a derringer, and an impostor was killed, while JFK is in Tahiti sipping Mai-Ties–are being marketed around the web.

The obvious cases are bad enough, but some not so obvious continue to make the rounds, including that William Greer, the driver, who pulled the limo to the left and to a stop to make sure JFK was killed, shot him with a .45 during the stop.  But if that had been the case, then JFK’s brains would have been blown out to the right/rear, when they were instead blown out to the left/rear.

More insidious are those who deny the existence of the limo stop or make other attempts to prove that the Zapruder film is authentic.  That poses a daunting task, since it would be necessary to show that, in every respect, the extant film corresponds to what actually happened during the event as it took place in Dealey Plaza.  If that is not true in any respect, its authenticity has been falsified.

Hany Farid, a computer scientist from Dartmouth College, who has a lab funded by the FBI, offers a striking case of a faculty member abusing his position to disseminate false information about the assassination of JFK. Jefferson Morely, a well-known reporter, whose work I have previously questioned, has created a new web site to promote his own extremely slanted view about JFK, including the Zapruder film.

Hany Farid and the backyard photos

We last encountered Hany Farid, a computer scientist from Dartmouth College, when he claimed to have shown that the backyard photographs of Lee Oswald, which were allegedly taken by his wife, Marina, had been verified by showing that he had been able to reconstruct the nose shadow in one of the photographs, which he claimed thereby established their authenticity.  I kid you not!


Since there are at least four of these photographs (and the negative for a fifth is missing), you might have thought that he would at least extend his argument to all of them, instead of focusing on only one.  And it might have been appropriate had he acknowledged that the nose shadow was only one of multiple proofs that the photos were faked, where he did not bother with any of the rest.


Thus, for example, the chin in the photos is a block chin, not Oswald’s more tapered and pointed chin.  There is an insert line between the lower lip and the chin. The tips of the fingers of his right hand are cut off.  And when you use the newspapers he is holding as an internal ruler, it turns out that the man in the photos at 5’6″ is too short to be Lee Oswald, who was approximately 5’10”.


Moreover, for a photographic expert, his claims are astoundingly shoddy, since it even turns out that the face in all four of the photos is exactly the same, which is an optical impossibility, insofar as the subject was photographed at different times and positions.  As Lee told Homicide Detective Will Fritz during his interrogation, his face had been pasted on someone else’s body–which is true!


This matte was subsequently discovered in the desk of a DPD detective, who claimed he had only make it to see if it could be done.  I wrote to the President of Dartmouth, Jim Yong Kim, at the time to object to the abuse of his faculty position, but it was swept under the rug.  Jim Marrs and I subsequently published “Framing the Patsy: The Case of Lee Harvey Oswald”, which leaves no doubt about it.

Hany Farid and the Zapruder film

As so often happens in Washington–where the bigger the liar, the further you go–Jim Youg Kin became the President of the World Bank, where, as Karen Hudes has explained, he has been doing more of the same but on a grander scale.  Hany Farid, in the meanwhile, having demonstrated his competence with regard to the backyard photos, has turned his attention to the Zapruder film.

As in the case of his work on the backyard photo(s), he commits the fallacy of special pleading by ignoring all the evidence that contradicts his predetermined position. Even if he were correct about the nose shadow in one photograph, it should not be the same across all four photos, not to mention other proofs of fakery. He wants to show that the black area in Frame 317 is a naturally occurring phenomenon.

Even if he were correct, that would not overcome the mountain of evidence from more than 60 witnesses, the internal contradictions in the extant film, its inconsistency with the medial and ballistic evidence and other witnesses who have viewed another and more complete film that includes, for example, the limo coming to a complete stop. As before, Hany Farid implies that, if one issue is resolvable, he has resolved them all.

So he compounds one fallacy (special pleading) with another (hasty generalization), which of course is the strategy he has adopted, hoping that those who are unfamiliar with the evidence in this case will be taken in. But he has to know that there is ample proof that the dark area at the back of the head was painted over in black and that the film is not even internally consistent, as Frame 374 reveals:

Since the blow out at the back of his head — the blue-gray, cashew-shaped defect, as opposed to the pinkish skull flap, which was also blown open when JFK was hit in the right temple by a frangible (or “exploding”) bullet — it has to have been cover-up in those earlier frames, as as group of Hollywood film restoration experts have long-since concluded.  So Farid is committing a fraud by abusing his position at Dartmouth to spread false information to the public about the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. Hany Farid is a fraud.

YouTube - Veterans Today -

Jefferson Morley and the Zapruder film


Jefferson Morley

Jefferson Morley

Is there any chance that he is unaware of the importance of Frame 374 or the confirmation of the painting over of the blow out in Frame 317 and many other frames?  He lists The Great Zapruder Film Hoax (2003) among his references, which gives the specious impression that he has actually studied its contents and findings.  Frame 374, which is emphasized in the prologue, refutes his claims about the film, as I have shown.  So Hany Farid only had to read as far as page 25 to know that what he was claiming was false. An even more blatantly fallacious approach to the film is found on Jefferson Morley’s JFKFacts.org web site:

About JFK Facts

It is not difficult for even new students of JFK to discover there is something odd about Jefferson Morley’s new JFKFacts.org web site, since he lists the web site of John McAdams, who is a notorious proponent of the lone-gunman theory, as “one of the best”, and my assassinationscience.com, as “one of the worst”.  When he was challenged about this classification, he explained that his derogation of my site was because I promote the alteration of the Zapruder film, which is ironic, since the faking of the film is a fact about the assassination of JFK.  Here is the challenge (posed by someone other than I) and his response thereto:

Questioning my listing

He dismisses the alterationist thesis, not by refuting any of the evidence, but on the basis of hypothetical questions, where the answer to 1) appears to be that it is flawed and they did not want to make it available for research that might expose its shortcomings, as John P. Costella, Ph.D., has done; and 2) that it DID ignite a call for a reinvestigation by the House Select Committee on Assassinations (1977-79), because it appears to show the effects of a shot fired from the right/front!  How can Jefferson Morley pretend to be an expert on the assassination of JFK when he is abysmally ignorant about it?  He characterizes his questions as “elementary facts” when they are both predicated on false assumptions.  On JFK, Morley is a moron.

Approved comment #1

Indeed, to be precise about it, questions cannot qualify as facts because (apart from their presuppositions, which in this case are false) they are non-assertive. Asking a question is not the same thing as positing an answer. On a proper understanding of the meaning of the word “fact” as a claim that is not only true but provably true, he has blundered. It is a fact that the Zapruder film cannot possibly be authentic, even on the basis of the simple proof I have advanced comparing frames 317 and 374 above! It is not even internally consistent, since it shows both a blow-out and no blow out at the back of the same head at approximately the same time.

Approved comment #2

Morely characterizes assassinationscience.com as “misnamed”, which is absurd. Even Vincent Bugliosi has observed that my three are “the only exclusively scientific books” ever published on the death of JFK. It is also a fact that I have published many articles making this point, including “JFK: Who’s telling the truth: Clint Hill or the Zapruder film?” and “Did Zapruder film ‘the Zapruder film’?”, to which the answer is emphatically, “No!”, because no one took a film fabricated in a laboratory, as was the extant film at a CIA lab in Rochester, NY, near Kokak Headquarters.

Multiple proofs the film is a fake


So much proof that the film is a fabrication has been published–where some of those proofs are as simple and straightforward as the one I have just presented–that I shall simply summarize some of the most important proofs that have appeared since the publication of The Great Zapruder Film Hoax (2003), where it is beyond belief that any serious student of the assassination of JFK, much less experts on film and photos, would continued to deny them:


(1) We have more than 60 witnesses who reported seeing the limo slow dramatically or come to a complete stop, where it slowed dramatically AS it came to a complete stop, where those witnesses include all four of the motorcycle escort officers:  See “What happened on Elm Street? The Eyewitnesses Speak” compiled by John P. Costella, Ph.D.

(2)  We also know that Officer James Chaney motored forward to inform Chief Curry the president had been shot, which was confirmed by Chief of  Police Jesse Curry, Secret Service Agents Winston Lawson and Forrest Sorrels, as well as Motorcycle Officers Bobby Hargis, James Chaney, and Marrion Baker:  See “New Proof of JFK Film Fakery”.

(3)  We know that, for nearly 50 years, Clint Hill has described climbing on the trunk, pushing Jackie down, lying across their bodies, peering into the wound, observing a fist-sized blow-out and giving a “thumbs down”, all before the limo had reached the Triple Underpass:  See “JFK: Who’s telling the truth: Clint Hill or the Zapruder film?”

YouTube - Veterans Today -

(4) We know that the original 8mm, already split film developed in Dallas, was taken to the NPIC on Saturday, the 23rd, and that a substitute 16mm, unsplit film, developed in Rochester, was taken there on Sunday, the 24th, where two different teams worked on the different versions: See “US Government Official: JFK Cover-Up, Film Fabrication”.

(5) We also know that a half-dozen or more have viewed one or another film, different from the extant, including William Reymond, Rich DellaRosa, Gregory Burnham and others, whose contents generally converge, where Rich DellaRosa’s description of what he has seen appears as an Appendix to The Great Zapruder Film Hoax (2003): See “Did Zapruder film ‘the Zapruder film’?”

(6) We have John Costella’s precise visual tutorial about evidence internal to the film that explains how we can know that the film is a fabrication, where all of its frames had to be reshot to create the right sequence of “ghost panels”:  See “The JFK Assassination Film Hoax: An Introduction”. Here’s an informal discussion of his research on the film:

YouTube - Veterans Today -

(7) We know that they not only removed the limo stop but painted over the blow-out in early frames and that the “blob” and the blood spray were painted in, but that they overlooked that in later frames, especially in Frame 374, the blow-out can be seen, as I explain in many places, including “What happened to JFK–and why it matters today”:

(8) More recently, in  “The Two NPIC Zapruder Film Events: Signposts Pointing to the Film’s Alteration”(2012) and “The Two NPIC Zapruder Film Events: Analysis and Implications” (2012), Doug Horne has substantiated that the original was taken to the NPIC on Saturday, the 23rd, and the substitute was brought there on Sunday, the 24th.

The timeline argument–that there was no opportunity for the film to have been faked, which Josiah Thompson has endlessly promoted–has no basis in fact and was merely a gambit.  We know that the film was altered, which is proven by the multiple lines of argument I have advanced.  We also know when and where it was altered and when and where the fake film was substituted for the original.

Since rationality requires that we revise our beliefs with the acquisition of new evidence and alternative hypotheses, the time has come to abandon the fantasy that the Zapruder film is authentic. But don’t expect the Josiah Thompsons, the Robert Grodens and the lesser fry to abandon their promotion of Zapruder film authenticity. Consider this: The JFK Lancer Conference for the 50th observance of the death of JFK in Dallas is featuring as its keynote speaker Jefferson Morley!

Jim Fetzer, a former Marine Corps officer, is McKnight Professor Emeritus at the University of Minnesota Duluth. 

Jim Fetzer

A former Marine Corps officer, Jim Fetzer has published widely on the theoretical foundations of scientific knowledge, computer science, artificial intelligence, cognitive science, and evolution and mentality.

McKnight Professor Emeritus at the University of Minnesota Duluth, he has also conducted extensive research into the assassination of JFK, the events of 9/11, and the plane crash that killed Sen. Paul Wellstone.

The founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, his latest books include The Evolution of Intelligence (2005), The 9/11 Conspiracy (2007), Render Unto Darwin (2007), and The Place of Probability in Science (2010).

Related Posts:

The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT or any other VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors or partners and technicians. Notices

Posted by on August 12, 2013, With 0 Reads, Filed under Of Interest. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Comments Closed

26 Responses to "The JFK War: Hany Farid, Jefferson Morley and the Zapruder film"

  1. Cold Wind  August 16, 2013 at 8:58 am

    Great article. But there is no hope for justice and, yes, retribution in the JFK assassination until we are able to wrest control of our government and other vital institutions from the Zionists subversives, who have taken over America.

  2. Chandler  August 15, 2013 at 3:23 pm

    Excellent! Excellent! 50 years later, and the man is still a fascination to many. He loved being president. He cared about everyone, every single one of us in ways that have dumbfounded even the most prominent families of this country who have sold themselves as our saviors. Those who have become the most traitorous families who ever graced this country.

    Once again Fetzer has documented more buffoonery on the part of those eager to cover up the assassination to protect their own selves.

    Thank you for another masterpiece.

    These leaders today are to spineless to reveal the truth to any of us. R.I.P JFK. I’ve never forgotten what you tried to do for all of us and this country.

  3. NavyBrat  August 15, 2013 at 12:44 am

    Excellent article Jim.
    Now that the 50 year anniversary is approaching, it may be instructive to see why JFK was so feared by the Establishment. He had a mind like a steel trap, and it comes over very well in a speech he gave relating to medical care for US citizens. Take nine minutes to watch and listen.

  4. Snoopy  August 13, 2013 at 10:53 am

    Dr. Fetzer, what, if anything, do you have to say in reference to statements by a police motorcycle cop, a stationary police officer, and Sen. Yarborough (who was in a following vehicle) concerning the smell of gunpowder eminating from the limo?

    • Jim Fetzer  August 13, 2013 at 6:56 pm

      Well, I presume there were shots fired closely enough that that smell drifted over Elm Street. But surely you can appreciate that the ballistics and medical evidence falsify the hypothesis. If Greer, sitting to the left/front of JFK, had shot him with a .45, then his brains would have been blown out to the right/rear, not the left/rear, where they hit Officer Hargis so hard he initially thought him himself had been shot. Q.E.D.

    • Snoopy  August 14, 2013 at 9:07 am

      Right, concerning theories placing Greer as the deliverer of the kill shot I was initially intrigued by the possibility but as you state the soft tissue blowout ballistics don’t match. That leaves the Jackie Kennedy “Pink Panther” shooter theory, a possibility I don’t see discussed among “mainstream” JFK researchers. If you can definitively address this I’ll appreciate it as what is avoided spikes my curioristy, Jackie’s lack of emotional display in the immediate aftermath and onward together with her departure from the USA into the Onassis orbit stikes me as odd, and given John’s exra-maritial exploits IMO you can never discount the capability of physical retribution when it comes to a woman scorned.

    • Jim Fetzer  August 14, 2013 at 9:24 am

      No, I have discussed this on other comment threads. You are mistaking shock for absence of emotion. She loved Jack and cradled him in her arms all the way to Parkland. She had crawled out onto the trunk to retried a chunk of his brains and skull, which she held in her hand all the way to the hospital. After they had pried his moribund body from her arms, she entered Trauma Room #1 and approached the anesthesiologist, “Pepper” Jenkins, asking, “Will this help?” Where in the body did she allegedly shoot him? and with what weapon? SHE LOVED JACK. I am sorry, but there is NO medical, ballistic or other forensic evidence to support this. NONE AT ALL. I am stunned that anyone would take it seriously. STUNNED. And you are not alone. It is pure, unadulterated and complete rubbish. I hope that answers your question.

    • Snoopy  August 14, 2013 at 10:09 am

      Thank you for the breakdown. Perhaps I mistook shock for other emotions. Teddy’s behavoir from the 80’s through his death does leave me with a bad taste in my mouth, as if he wilingly acquiecsed to the power of the shadow government. I’ve seen hi-res pictures of Teddy with skull cap literally bowing to religious leaders of golbal Zion, as have Prince Charles and Queen Elizabeth. It is literally disgusting. So, I am always on the lookout for operatives within the realm.

      At this time I’m listening to your podcast: nsa wm kroft.mp3 Sir, thank you for being a brave voice in a world of cowards (that world does not include the contributors of VT). Since you don’t outwardly promote your podcast page I will link to it for the benefit of newcomers


    • Snoopy  August 14, 2013 at 10:11 am

      Thank you for the breakdown. Perhaps I mistook shock for other emotions. Teddy’s behavoir from the 80′s through his death does leave me with a bad taste in my mouth, as if he wilingly acquiecsed to the power of the shadow government. I’ve seen hi-res pictures of Teddy with skull cap literally bowing to religious leaders of global Zion, as have Prince Charles and Queen Elizabeth. It is literally a disgusting spectacle. So, I am always on the lookout for operatives within the realm.

      At this time I’m listening to your podcast: nsa wm kroft.mp3 Sir, thank you for being a brave voice in a world of cowards (that world does not include the contributors of VT). Since you don’t outwardly promote your podcast page I will link to it for the benefit of newcomers.


  5. DaveE  August 13, 2013 at 9:42 am

    I don’t see what the point of attacking Jefferson Morley is. He seems to agree with you about 80 percent, in my estimation, only disagreeing on the role Oswald played, as far as I can tell.

    Morley seem to think, like me, that Oswald was an “insider” who was set up by his buddies in the CIA, last minute, as a designated patsy. This seems to be their M.O. more often than not. We’ve seen it recently with the Tsarnaevs and Snowden, IMHO. Take an insider, set him up, make him the designated fall guy and PRESTO, mission accomplished.

    Setting up an insider is almost the perfect crime, since they can later release evidence of complicity, since the patsy WAS, in fact, complicit.

    • Jim Fetzer  August 13, 2013 at 9:59 am

      You don’t seem to appreciate that disinfo is most effective when it combines about 80% truth with 20% falsehoods. The issues on which Morley has attacked me are crucial to understanding the case. Neither the Mafia, pro- or anti-Castro Cubans, nor the KGB could have got ahold of the Zapruder film in order to revise it. And what, indeed, would have been their motives?

      I think you need to give this more thought. He is posing as an authority with a sophisticated web site that one expert has described to me as a typical CIA operation. How can he be promoting McAdams and trashing me, given our respective research and track records? He is TAKING FOR GRANTED the film is authentic, when it is EASILY PROVEN TO BE FAKE, as I have done above.

      You might want to review some additional studies by Douglas Horne about the substitution of the revised film at the NPIC over the weekend of 23-24 November 1964. I would have expected a more discerning appraisal from you, DaveE. The faking of the backyard photos, the Zapruder film and the Altgens6 are three of the most important discoveries in the history of JFK research. Get real:

      “US Government Official: JFK Cover-Up, Film Fabrication”

      “JFK: Who’s telling the truth: Clint Hill or the Zapruder film?”

      “The Two NPIC Zapruder Film Events: Signposts Pointing to the Film’s Alteration” (with Douglas P. Horne)

      “The Two NPCI Zapruder Film Events: Analysis and Implications” (with Douglas P. Horne)

    • Jim Fetzer  August 13, 2013 at 10:06 am

      Incidentally, there was nothing “last minute” about setting up Lee as the patsy. He was part of a pseudo-defector program to have former US military enter the Soviet Union, feign disillusionment with America, then return to the US where they could be used for that role as circumstances might dictate. I think you need to do more research on the assassination and Lee Oswald.

      The “three tramps”, by the way, appear to have been fall-back patsies had Oswald not worked out. Are you in doubt whether or not the Zapruder film was massively revised? that JFK had a huge, fist-sized blow-out at the back of his head, and that Hany Farid and Jefferson Morley, each in their own way, are acting to cover it up, including by trashing me for proof the film’s a fake?

    • DaveE  August 13, 2013 at 4:53 pm

      Fair enough. On re-reading your assesment of Morley, I think you may be right. He hasn’t done much counter-argument and I will admit, if the the Zapruder film was, in fact, doctored, that narrows the suspect-list BIGTIME.

      Not sure if this is ignorance or deliberate disinfo, however. Morley wouldn’t exactly be the first guy to proclaim himself an “expert” with little or no credentials to do so.

      I think we’ll find out soon, however. This will be a pivotal year for JFK truth, as you say.

      As for Oswald’s set up, it surely was long running and multi layered, as most effective operations require. By “last minute” I meant that Oswald was betrayed at the last minute, not that the operation was done hastily.

    • Jim Fetzer  August 13, 2013 at 6:49 pm

      I organized the first symposium on Zapruder film fakery at the JFK Lancer Conference in 1996. Many articles about it have been published in ASSASSINATON SCIENCE (1998), MURDER IN DEALEY PLAZA (2000) and THE GREAT ZAPRUDER FILM HOAX (2003). Douglas Horne added more in his INSIDE THE ARRB (2009). Given all the articles and books published about it, there is no excuse for anyone to continue to promote Zapruder authenticity mythology. When it comes to JFK research, Farid is a fraud and Morley is a moron.

  6. Mopar21277  August 13, 2013 at 9:38 am

    On Prof. Fetzer’s radio show, didn’t Jim Marrs say that Spielberg and Tom Hanks are making a dis-info JFK movie, based upon Bugliosi’s book, due for release this fall? Like Gordon told Prof. Fetz, 90% of the JFK “research” community are infiltrators/dis-info agents.

    • Snoopy  August 13, 2013 at 10:55 am

      I don’t know how this applies to the topic but I wouldn’t piss on Spielberg and Hanks if they were on fire.

  7. mrfrisky  August 13, 2013 at 6:52 am

    Professor Fetzer, the line seems to be drawn in the proverbial sand. The next 3 1/2 months should be an all out war on the JFK front. This is not surprising at at all. The OIC is not even invited to the party, as noted at https://www.maryferrell.org/wiki/index.php/Featured_50th_Anniversary_Conferences What else is new!

    Does not matter. The Santa Barbara Conference on November 22, will be at the vanguard of JFK Research. Lots of new information for those attending. A great chance for those on the west coast to see for themselves and get involved: http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/06/13/jfk-50th-the-keys-to-understanding-his-assassination/

    Larry Rivera

  8. Shangrila01  August 12, 2013 at 7:33 pm

    “How can Jefferson Morley pretend to be an expert on the assassination of JFK when he is abysmally ignorant about it?“–Jim Fetzer

    Simple the Abysmally Ignorant Encyclopedic text book of lies, Assanges Liki-pedophile site and others, when you have Lies masquerading as the truth and always source it as written by god alone and know your material flawlessly you can pull the wool over many people’s eye’s especially the intellectually lazy variety.

    Only this god hasnt a clue about trajectory or ballistics which means at any moment Earth’s about to fly off in the opposing direction to the Earth’s orbital momentum. It’s text book i tells ya.

    See ya cant even make a slag slang term properly these days dammit, right clicked liki-pedophile /Loki-pedophile got 761,00 returns with top choice a kid band that sounds about as good as the name they choose…

  9. joeflaherty  August 12, 2013 at 7:05 pm

    I was very young the first time I saw the pic of Oswald allegedly holding a rifle. But even then I thought his head was much too large for the body, very much out of proportion.

  10. Preston James, Ph.D  August 12, 2013 at 3:35 pm

    Outstanding article that exposes several “lying dogs” who think they can con the people with their crap and myths designed to continue the coverup of the greatest crime of the 20th Century. How these dimwits can sleep at night is beyond me serving as traitors in support of the cabal that assassinated JFK, which by the way is still in power today and intends to put another one of theirs in the presidency in the next election.

    Who did it? The JCS, CIA Op40, with the FBI running the coverup as they usually do for these USG murder ops (as they did with the Senator Wellstone murder done by JSOC, ordered by chicanery, whose heart is actually just fine despite all the media crap about it). The cabal that murdered JFK is still spending millions to keep this crime covered up, because if the public ever completely connects the dots, it can bring the whole USG down. These dupes who support the coverup are either dirty or mindkontrolled, one or the other.

    And Prof Fetzer is correct, the coming 50 year anniversary of the JFK assassination is bringing a massive coverup ops on with numerous doofuses and absurd impossible claims designed to misinform and confuse in order to lead folks away from the truth. There is no statute of limitations on murder and the crime is still prosecutable. Gee, it doesn’t take a Rhodes scholar to understand that Mr. Zapata was the controller who reaped the benefits and built a dynasty based on drugs, money laundering, illegal wars, war crimes and murder.

    • joeflaherty  August 12, 2013 at 6:51 pm

      Does anyone in this country, or living abroad, still believe the ‘official story’? I can’t think of a soul who buys into the lie, except for the talking heads, of course.

    • leecahalan  August 13, 2013 at 8:58 am

      Lately I’ve been looking at the massive JFK assassination disinformation spamming in a positive light: The dark forces feeling so overwhelmed with guilt and fear that they feel the need to engage in a full court press between now and the 50th anniversary. Example:

      Much of what has led us to realize the extensive involvement of GHW Bush in the planning, execution and cover-up of JFK murder comes from his own mouth. Both the things he says and the things he does not say. So it ought to be with great cheer that we learn of these stupid, lying and recycled theories of the killers: Same as when the prosecutor gets the lying defendant to take the stand:

      All the prosecution needs to do to convict is allow the fool run his mouth (lol)!

    • Jim Fetzer  August 13, 2013 at 9:08 am

      See, for example, “Did George H.W. Bush supervise a JFK hit team?”

      and “Was George H.W. Bush involved in the assassination of JFK?”

  11. Clare Kuehn  August 12, 2013 at 2:08 pm

    Wonderful, Dr Jim.

    Best intro site re. absolutes of optical fakery in Zapruder film, some of which would not work with any camera on any planet, is at assassination science.com: http://assassinationscience.com/johncostella/jfk/intro/

    Most wouldn’t believe that disinfo campaigners would agree to do it in this day and age. Just to posit some reasons they might:

    1. Money and rage at “truther types” — “Left hippies” or “Right bunker-builders” — in their minds.

    2. Concern that this truth would upset the current world peace too much (yes, true wake-ups do change people’s dynamics with others, so they work harder for some things, but this can seem “not calm” to those who want calm, not true good peace)

    3. Ignorance and confusion in the debunker himself or herself, leading to agreeing to be an agent to promote what we know to be opposite to his or her belief.

    Thank you, Fetzer and Costella.

    • leecahalan  August 13, 2013 at 6:41 pm

      Those that disperse disinformation are a researcher’s best friend. The theory being that the liar is always trying to get reality to match his fiction which is nearly always impossible. A good detective knows this and thus listens and watches the guilty party expose his falsehoods one by one.

      Seen in this light on of the biggest “gifts” we’ve ever received is GHW Bush’s ill advised words on JFK murder at Jerry Ford’s funeral. His words are those of a guilty man. I only wish he would continue blabbing on and on about it.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login