Veteran Justice Demanded from Federal Judge

VA lawsuit

Joe Esposito, a disabled Vietnam War Marine Combat Veteran and loyal member of the Old Veterans Guard at the ACLU press conference in June, 2011, upon hearing their announcement of filing a lawsuit against the VA

By Robert L. Rosebrock


LOS ANGELES – In a Central District Federal Courtroom on August 16, it was a battle over “plain language” as a team of well-prepared ACLU attorneys overwhelmed an unimpressive team of U.S. Attorneys from the Department of Justice in defining the law and the facts regarding a lawsuit against the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) on behalf of disabled and homeless Veterans.

The suit involves claims against the VA for misusing property that was exclusively deeded 125 years ago for a National Home on behalf of disabled and disadvantaged Veterans.

At the beginning of the Hearing, Judge S. James Otero outlined the necessity of following “plain language” in VA regulations regarding “sharing agreements” with third parties that were to be specifically used for providing health care services to benefit Veterans.

Instead, these loosely written agreements benefitted a wealthy private school to build a swimming pool, tennis courts and an athletic facility that are off limits to Veterans, a dog park to benefit the general public, theaters to benefit the general public, a public park for the benefit of a wealthy, neighboring homeowner group, a state-of-the-art collegiate baseball stadium to benefit the UCLA athletic department, and other flagrant misuses of these hallowed grounds.

Meanwhile, tens of thousands of Veterans live homeless and hungry on the dangerous streets of Los Angeles, our nation’s capital for homeless Veterans.

Mark Rosenbaum, chief legal counsel for the ACLU of Southern California, conclusively dismantled the government’s feeble and ambiguous defense presented by deputy U.S. Attorney Karen Bloom.

After delivering powerful evidence that refuted any notion of legality associated with the sharing agreements, Mr. Rosenbaum requested the Judge to declare all challenged agreements between the VA and third parties to be null and void and outside the authority of the government, and to further issue an injunction against all future agreements that violated the law.

After listening to arguments from both sides and saying he “heard enough,” Judge Otero said he would be issuing his ruling “soon.”

In plain language, these so-called sharing agreements are illegal. And if Judge Otero rules any other way than nullifying these unlawful agreements and immediately evicting all who are on these grounds illegally, it will be a serious miscarriage of justice and an unforgivable insult and affront to all men and women who have served in our Military to defend the Constitution of the United States.

Let the Judge Know!

Please let Judge S. James Otero know that you want him to follow the law and terminate all the challenged leases in the Valenti vs. Shinseki lawsuit and that he order they vacate the premises, posthaste.

Please be respectful but forthright in demanding justice on behalf of Veterans and their legally deeded property:

Contact his Court Clerk: Victor Cruz Telephone: 213-894-1796 / e-mail

NBC News Coverage

Following is an overview of the Federal Court Hearing by NBC News Reporter Patrick Healy. The coverage is a TV video that includes an interview with Nancy Freedman, chairwoman of the Brentwood Community Council and a Board Member of Veterans Park Conservancy, which wants to build a public park on Veterans property.

The wealthy homeowner group has a 30-year lease on a 16-acre billion dollar parcel of Veterans property to build a public park for the benefit of the entire community, rent-free.

Ms. Freedman who appears insincere and nervous, claims they are not taking anything away from Veterans but are doing “good” for them.

If that’s the case, then let us hope that they never decide to do anything bad against Veterans.

Over the years, the federal government has allowed the Veteran Administrations in West Los Angeles to be used by other groups, public and private. Now, veterans say those other organizations have to go.

Judge to Rule “Soon” on Suit Contending Misuse of VA Property


By Patrick Healy


Army veteran and activist Robert Rosebrock stood outside the Los Angeles Federal Courthouse and pointed to a large print of an aerial image that only minutes earlier had been used as a courtroom exhibit.

“You have this state of the art facility here,” said Rosebrock, indicating a ballpark on the Veterans Administration West Los Angeles Healthcare Center, one of several campus facilities operated by outside entities.

“But we have homeless veterans outside. It’s not right.”

In a nutshell, he had spelled out the core issue of Valenti vs. Shinseki, a suit contending it’s illegal to commit Veterans Administration (VA) real estate to the use of outside groups, both public and private – even commercial enterprises.

Driving north from Wilshire Boulevard through the VA campus, one can see oil production leasehold with large above-ground storage tanks. Not far away is Jackie Robinson Stadium, the home park for the UCLA Bruins baseball team.

Marriott leases a space for a laundry that serves a number of hospitals, though — as ACLU Mark Rosenbaum notes — ironically not the VA hospital on the same campus.

Neighboring Brentwood School has built athletic facilities on 20 acres at the northwest corner of the 388-acre VA property. There are two theaters. A rental car company no longer uses a VA parking lot for vehicle storage, but in all there remain 15 sites operated by outside entities for their own purposes.

“Let’s use the land the way it was intended–for veteran patients only,” said Francisco Juarez, a USMC veteran of the Vietnam War.

When the site was originally deeded for the “National Home for Disabled Soldiers and Sailors” in the 19th century, it carried the stipulation that the land forever be reserved for veterans. More recent federal statutes specify that VA healthcare resources must benefit veterans’ healthcare, according to Amos Hartston of the Inner City Law Center, co-counsel for the veterans suing Veterans Affairs Secretary Eric Shinseki.

In 2008, Congress forbade the VA from entering into further property sharing arrangements at the West LA campus.

But in court Friday, attorney Karen Bloom argued for the VA that the existing arrangements are legal as a use of healthcare resources because they do benefit veterans in some fashion.

In some cases, Bloom said, the VA collects rental income that remains for the use of the West LA campus. As another example, she said parks provide veterans a therapeutic environment. Opposing counsel was not persuaded.

“They might be good uses. They might be bringing in revenue. But what they are not is healthcare for veterans,” Hartston said.

At issue Friday was a request for a finding that the agreements are invalid and an injunction against the VA. Federal District Judge S. James Otero declined to rule from the bench, but indicated he hoped to have a decision “soon.”

Should he rule against the VA, it’s not yet clear what the immediate impact would be.

Arguing for the suing veterans, ACLU attorney Mark Rosenbaum urged Judge Otero to strike down the agreements, which conceivably could have the impact of compelling the outside groups to quit the VA property in short order.

VA attorney Bloom took the position that a decision on the propriety of the property sharing should be handed down before the court considers any potential remedies. Some of the uses date back decades.

UCLA’s Jackie Robinson Stadium — home of the NCAA champions — originally was built as an American Legion ballpark. Even some veterans critical of the VA expressed hope the ballpark could stay and remain as a tribute to the late trailblazing athlete who served in the Army.

Many in the neighboring Brentwood believe the community has benefitted from at least some of the VA’s property sharing agreements, and would prefer not to see them stricken.

“It’s benefiting the soldiers. It’s benefiting the community,” said Nancy Freedman, chair of the Brentwood Community Council.

Among the areas of campus that ultimately could be affected by a ruling against the VA are 16 prominent acres inside the northeast corner of Wilshire and San Vicente boulevards. That land is being developed as a public park under the authority of the Veterans Park Conservancy, which has an agreement with VA, but is not part of it.

Rosebrock believes that site should be used to create housing for homeless veterans. He sees the VA’s commitment to a public park as evidence the VA is under the influence of community voices that he contends would prefer VA property be put to uses that benefit the community before veterans.

Freedman, who sits on the Veterans Park Conservancy Board, disagrees.

“Their whole purpose is to do good for veterans,” Freedman said. “Not to take away from veterans.” She noted that even as the property sharing continues for now, the VA is proceeding with additional housing units on campus.

Patrick Healy reports from Brentwood for the NBC4 News at 5 p.m



Short URL:

The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT or any other VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners and technicians. Legal Notice

Posted by on Aug 18 2013, With 0 Reads, Filed under Editor, Vet News, Veterans Affairs. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.


To post, we ask that you login using Facebook, Yahoo, AOL, or Hotmail in the box below.
Don't have a social network account? Register and Login direct with VT and post.
Before you post, read our Comment Policy - Feedback

Comments Closed

1 Comment for “Veteran Justice Demanded from Federal Judge”

  1. Good luck. The moment the Central Bank opened the first time in AmeriKa, we were defeated by the City of London. And it’s been all down hill since.

    We have about as much chance for justice in this as Germany had against the Central Bank owned “allies” before WW2;

Comments are closed


Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Join Our Daily Newsletter
  View Newsletter ARCHIVE


  1. NEO – Washington’s New Enemy Image – Victor Orbán
  2. NeoRenaissance & the Green Eyed Grocer!
  3. Hawks in US Congress threaten Iran with sanctions
  4. I Support Israel’s National Bill
  5. NEO – West supports Kiev in new East Ukraine war
  6. NEO – America’s Nuclear Command Meltdown
  7. ISIL Israeli mercenary army
  8. RT Outs Amanpour, the “Cow of Propaganda
  9. Iran nuclear talks end in Vienna, new deadline set for July 1
  10. Al Etejah-Panorama: Gilad Atzmon on Ed Miliband, The Labour and the Jewish Lobby (TV)
  11. Hagel Resigning, Pushed to the Curb
  12. European Colony Doubles Down on Institutional Racism
  13. ‘No nuclear deal by Nov. 24 deadline’
  14. Uri Avnery – The UnHoly City
  15. US should work with Syrian Army against ISIL
  16. Climate Change or Climate Justice
  17. Part 2. Battle of the Bulge and the Malmedy Massacres
  18. Evil with a Nice Face – The Janus Principle
  19. Afghanistan: Empty Peace
  20. Black Saturday Sale Starring New .308 SASS Tacticals
  1. Kalin: Hey Gordon! How would I go about buying one of those "custom built Norinco SKS with a 16.5 inch Paratrooper length barrel ... AK style muzzle brake. mounted in an ...
  2. franktalk: Gilad, an excellent interview that provides very clear analysis of the modern perspective of what will result if the self-appointed Jewish oligarchs are allowed to continue their addiction with control. ...
  3. williammartin: Oh, I might add... For a Military today who returns not to parades and confetti and is SPIT upon by their own "FATHERLAND" Security and called Domestic Terrorist's. Hence again ...
  4. williammartin: I became "AWARE" of what Propaganda was in 1979. As a Shortwave operator of 40 years I was talking directly to those same "Evil Russian's" who all the "Boy's" ...
  5. Dan: The question whether Menendez, Kirk, MCCain, Graham, ad nauseam, are assets or agents seems clear to me. In every instance I know of they represent the interests of the Zionist ...

Veterans Today Poll

For over 60 years, US Taxpayers have been funding Israel, Palestine and Middle East. Are you happy with return on investment or would you prefer those monies be invested at home instead?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...