School closed, actors used: Robbie Parker, entertainer, exposed

School closed, actors used: Robbie Parker, entertainer, exposed


by Jim Fetzer and Victoria Muramoto


“In the end, that’s what this election is about. Do we participate in a politics of cynicism or a politics of hope?”–Barack Obama


Now you don'tAs I have previously explained (“Sandy Hook Elementary School: closed in 2008, a stage in 2012″), the school appears to have been non-operational during at least the four years prior to the events of 14 December 2012.

There is lots of confirming evidence, with or without the Wayback Machine’s indirect proof–that if there was no internet activity on specific days, probably there was none during the interval within which they fall–that confirms it had been closed.

In addition to not being compliant with the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), video footage shows that it was being used as a storage facility, where even The Newtown Bee reported that it was laden with asbestos and other bio-hazards. No student should have been there.

More proof it had been abandoned

Moreover, no activities of the kinds that are commonplace at elementary schools, such as spelling bees with winners, students of the month, teachers of the year, and so on, were being announced from 2008-2012:

YouTube - Veterans Today -

And, in response to the republication of “The Newtown School Board Meeting and the meaning of silence” on James Tracy’s memoryholeblog.com, John Luv offer the following telling observations:


John Luv says:

Mr. Fetzer, you need to pour over hard copy newspapers from the Hartford Courant or the Danbury Newspaper, not the Newtown Bee that cover the time frame of 2008 to 2012. I know that you will not find one word of Sandy Hook Elementary School with the exception of the issue of 12-14-12 in any of those papers. You will find plenty of information on the other Newtown Schools concerning Honor Rolls, budgets, meetings, cancellations, etc. This hard copy proves that the name Sandy Hook Elementary School was not in print for that four year period.

I have been looking for old Hartford and Danbury Newspapers from the 1980s and 1990s. Old print hardcopy newspapers can’t be forged like internet articles. There is an article in print out there that details the closing of Sandy Hook Elementary School. Key years in those newspapers to check are 1980 around May or June and also 1995/1996 when Fairfield Hills Hospital in Newtown closed. There would be information out there in hard copy world when this school actually closed. When this article is found, the actual newspaper can be used as evidence and made public for all to see.

Most of us who have researched this event from day one know that the school was clearly closed. Let’s all look for the actual newspaper that mentions this fact. It could have been closed as early as 1980 based on the conditions of the parking lot alone. It could have been closed in conjunction with Fairfield HIlls in the 1990s. Archived articles can be compromised. A Hoarder’s copies of newspapers should still be intact. Government agents are very smart, but they are not perfect.

After all, how much easier to manage the deception if they did not have to deal with the evacuation of some 600 or more additional students and around 75 members of the staff, including the administration, the custodians and the other teachers, who were invisible on 14 December 2012. 600 students would be hard to conceal. Where are they?

No students, no buses, no EMTs, no ambulances, no Med-Evac chopper

No students, teachers or staff / no buses, no EMTs, no ambulances, no Med-Evac chopper

Not only was it unnecessary for there to be a surge of EMTs into the building and no reason to summon Med-Evac helicopters, but there was not even any need for buses, who would simply been a distraction.  As we know, none of the above were there because they simply were not needed. It was a mock terror drill.

As Wikipedia reports, “On January 31 [2013], the Newtown school board voted unanimously to ask for police officer presence in all of its elementary schools; previously other schools in the district had such protection, but Sandy Hook had not been one of those”, which would make sense if the school had already been closed.

Who was responsible and why

We know this was a drill and not a bona fide emergency,  where Governor Malloy, during a press conference held that day, explained that he and the Lt. Governor had been “spoken to” that something like this might happen.  But what could he possibly have meant by that?  What kind of “something like this” might happen?

There are only two alternatives.  Either (1) he had been told that a shooting would take place in his state that would result in the deaths of many children; or (2) he was told that a drill would be conducted that would be presented as a live event. Since he took no steps to insure that (1) did not occur, the answer has to be (2).

Barack Obama and Project Longevity

And Governor Malloy received a visit from Attorney General Eric Holder less than a month before this event, where he must have been the person who spoke to him. And if Eric Holder was involved, then his boss, the President of the United States, has to have been involved, too. And we now have more proof that was indeed the case.

Robbie Parker, a crisis actor, with Barack Obama, President of the United States

Robbie Parker with Obama / Samuel Travis Delaney

We caught him! Robbie Parker, crisis actor, at long last exposed!


by Victoria Muramoto (with Jim Fetzer)

UPDATE: John Matthew Walker has contacted me and stated that he is not the person known as “Robbie Parker” in Sandy Hook. We have asked him to provide us with the name of his attorney and an affidavit stating that to be the case, which he has so far been unwilling to do. Should we turn out to have made a mistaken identification, we will correct the record. We want the truth, the whole truth and nothing but.

Today, 16 May 2014, he did not answer an arranged call between him and Victoria.  He has now made photos of himself unavailable on his web site and insists he is going to pursue this matter through litigation. We are just a bit stunned that he will not identify his attorney or provide an affidavit to us denying that he was the person known as “Robbie Parker” in Sandy Hook. We await and will report further developments.

Indeed, we were wrong about John Matthew Walker. He did not play the role of Robbie Parker, which we fully acknowledge having concluded on the basis of new evidence. I explain our error and now correct the record in “Sandy Hook and the real ‘Robbie Parker': SpotterRF, the DHS and the CIA”. The truth is far deeper and darker than a penniless musician in Austin. We are right about Sandy Hook, but wrong about John, to whom we apologize for our sincere mistake. He and his friends were right: he was not the real “Robbie Parker”.

Samuel Travis Delaney

Samuel Travis Delaney

We have located the one person who is going to blow the lid off THE MOCK TERROR, Sandy Hook School, shooting. He is infamously known as “Robbie Parker”, the father of Emilie Parker, who was allegedly killed during the 14 December 2012 Sandy Hook School shooting. Actually, his name isn’t Robbie Parker. His name is Samuel Travis Delaney.

Growing up, Samuel Delaney lived on Brookhurst Drive in Richardson, TX. He is approximately in his mid-forties. He and his  brother, Matthew Delaney, were born to Travis and Cynthia Delaney. He was married to a Elizabeth Bellanti, though they have no children and recently divorced. And lest I not forget, Samuel Travis Delaney, is a professional actor. (See [Robbie’s Press Conference] and [The 911 Call].)

Robbie the actor:performer:entertainer

Samuel Travis Delaney (aka “Robbie Parker”) is an actor, an entertainer and a musician who uses multiple aliases, including  Robbie Parker, John Matthew Walker, Samuel Adams (his favorite beer, we were told) and Eugene Rosenberg, which is his alias on YouTube. (See [facebook, Robbie Parker] and [facebook, John Matthew Walker].)

Robbie with Robbie

Robbie Parker at Emilie’s funeral / Samuel Travis Delaney

Robbie Parker = John Mathew Walker

Robbie was the “poster boy” as a  grieving parent who lost his daughter Emilie, in what we now understand was a cleverly contrived psychological warfare campaign known as “the Sandy Hook shooting”. This chameleon-like con-man, it appears, had one and only one purpose–to help to sell a lie. We have even uncovered his audition tape for Sandy Hook. Truth can be felt and lies sensed . . . . the unforeseen glitch.

Audition tapes

Robbie’s Press Conference

Robbie’s press conference was viewed around the world on 15 December 2012 but was just beyond the scope of Samuel’s acting capabilities, making his behavior at that press conference painfully awkward and even uncomfortable to witness. To those who were paying attention, it set off loud alarms:

YouTube - Veterans Today -

At the press conference, “Robbie Parker”, the grieving father, is already plugging his daughter’s “Emilie Parker Fund”, making us cringe. This strategically timed announcement, implemented the money-making scheme.  Surely, monetary compensation for Samuel Travis Delaney’s part was his principal motivation in this reprehensible ploy.( See [Emilie Parker Fund].)

Indeed, the very first post on the “Emilie Parker Fund” (after the cover photo was updated) was a pitch for donations:

“Alan Prothero and I have set up an account at America First Credit Union to help Robbie Parker and his family with their immediate needs due to their loss of their beautiful girl in the shooting this morning in Conn. You can put funds in the account or give them directly to me or Alan. Please contribute what you can and spread the word: Emilie Parker Memorial Account at America First Credit Union. Account #9056862.”

But the committed a gaffe.  The announcement was not simply premature, but grossly too early. Several posts later,

“We’ve had an update. The school is still on lock down, I assume pending investigations. Robbie and Alissa have very limited information. They haven’t been able to see Emilie, and they do not know if she is still in the school or if she was one of the ones rushed to the hospital. We apologize for the misinformation that we gave you earlier. But we know still that sweet Emilie was a victim. We just don’t know any detail about what exactly happened to her.”

Not knowing if this child, Emilie, had been hurt, let alone murdered, the fund account was created before the child’s death was even known to have occurred. The essence of a parents true grief, at losing a child, emanates from a parents heart break and is nothing less than palpable. Not duplicated nor sold as a bartering tool to serve a political agenda. A deception so vast , whereby making it unable to withstand longevity. The deplorable actions of Samuel Travis Delaney as well as other participants involved demands accountability.

Samuel Travis Delaney is most often pictured with pork-chop style, 70s sideburns. And as you can see, while playing his role as 'Robbie Parker' you can still make out the former shapes of those sideburns, due to a sunburn.

Samuel Travis Delaney is most often pictured with pork-chop style, 1970s sideburns. While playing his role as “Robbie Parker”, you can still make out the former shapes of those sideburns, due to a sunburn.

Our research suggests that no children were murdered on 14 December 2012 which strongly coincides with the evidence gathered. A planned event of this kind is technically known as a “MOCK TERROR DRILL” and, in this case, was announced prior to 14 December 2012:

mock terror drill

Drills are “as close as we can get to the real thing without people getting hurt. The [new] drills coach officers to directly engage the shooter instead of waiting for specialized SWAT teams to arrive.”- ALERRT Program Research Director J. Pete Blair. Consequently, the program has received $7,000,000 in funding, no less.

Robbie w:tatoos
John Matthew Walker (with tatoos) / Robbie Parker

Ever notice how “Robbie Parker” consistently wears a white t- shirt? To cover that large tattoo? We also feel heavy stage make up was used on Samuel’s other tattoos as well as temporary caps on his teeth. These tactics were employed on many of the actors who participated.

Why Mock Terror Drills?

The sequence of events the public was provided on 14 December 2012 by local and state authorities, coupled with the repetition of that narrative–in spite of its inconsistencies–by a national press that all-too-often has been co-opted by elements within government agencies in effect aids in what is nothing less than promoting a soft fascist agenda. The passive acceptance of this story is being hungrily exploited by those interests at the life-threatening expense of liberty and the rule of law in America. There were a few exceptions, such as this report:

YouTube - Veterans Today -

In order to appreciate the full dimensions of these exercises, the American people have to master a new vocabulary, which is familiar to their planners and participants but strange and remote to the public. The phrases and concepts that require understanding include the following:

1. PSYOPS seek to exploit human vulnerabilities in enemy governments, militaries and populations. PSYOPS and media fakery are in fact the primary weapon the global power elite uses to advance their tyrannical agenda in this day and age.

2. PSYWAR or “psychological warfare”, among the basic aspects of modern psychological operations (PSYOPS), have been known by many other names or terms, including Psy Ops, Political Warfare, “Hearts and Minds” and Propaganda.

a. Various techniques are used, by any set of groups, and aimed to influence a target audience’s value systems, its belief systems, emotions, motives, reasoning or behavior. It is used to induce confessions or reinforce attitudes and behaviors favorable to the originator’s objectives. It is often combined with black operations or false flag tactics. Target audiences can be governments, organizations, groups, and individuals.

b. A psychological warfare campaign is a war for the mind. Its primary weapons are sight and sound. PSYOPS can be disseminated by face-to-face communication, audio/visual means (television and films), the audio media (radio or loudspeaker), visual media (leaflets, newspapers, books, magazines and/or posters). The method of delivery may vary but the weapon is the message that is conveyed and how.

3. MOCK TERROR DRILLS are staged events that are used to send a message to the target audience, such as the American public. In the case of Sandy Hook, it was carefully, if somewhat sloppily, contrived to create the impression that, if we do not get guns under control, traumatic events, such as a mass shooting of innocent children, are bound to occur.

Samuel Travis Delaney and most of the others who participated are government paid actors, used to manipulate gullible Americans. These people who act in these roles are supporting in fascist legislation to disarm the public by influencing their emotions.  Social psychologists play important, even crucial roles in planning these events and predicting their outcomes.

YouTube - Veterans Today -

Why assist a Mock Terror Drill?

Our research shows that a cluster group of trusted actors (often related family members having political ties) are used for multiple drills. Many times those involved in these acting roles, considered “lower rungs”, are often unaware of the drills politically driven agendas.  But as long as they are appropriately paid, they appear to have no concerns.

Information disseminated to them is on a very limited, “need-to-know” basis and, with high probability, is combined with disinformation that provides “cover” or “plausible deniability” in the case of questioning once more even prevents them from honestly confronting the thought that they’ve been used as tools.  But money makes a difference.

This resistance is a important component and facilitates to the “conspiracy’s” success. Their monetary compensation becomes the luring incentive.  An especially egregious illustration is the United Way Support Fund that was established several days prior to the shooting.   One of the benefits of the internet not only that it facilitates the publication of new information but that it also allows mistakes to be captured and retained, of which this is an especially striking example:

United Way extends condolences three days early

The estimated payout was $281,000 paid to each of the victims’ families, who have raised additional funds from their own websites—some of which were apparently advertised on the web in advance of the shooting. At present, all of the victims, both children and adults, have memorial funds that are currently collecting money. “Sandy Hook Promise,” which actively solicits money for family members and others “impacted by this tragedy,” as well as for lobbying for “mental wellness and gun safety,” currently boasts of over 300,000 people who have made the “Sandy Hook Promise” to turn the “tragedy into a moment of transformation.”

The federal government has also forked over a lot of taxpayer money, including a $150,000 federal grant to Newtown to pay for two “school resource officers” (aka police), and $2.5 million in federal funds from they Department of Justice to compensate the local entities for their trouble: $663,444 to the Connecticut State Police, $602,293 to the town of Newtown, $882,812 to the town of Monroe and $296,838 to other partner agencies.

Robbie in Sandy Hook

John Matthew Walker / Robbie Parker

In addition, the Department of Education has awarded a total of $3.2 million to the Newtown Public School District under Project SERV (School Emergency Response to Violence) to help with ongoing recovery efforts following the shooting. See these reports: US Department of Education awards $1.3 million grant; US Department of Education awards $1.9 million grant. This hush money is sure to keep the lid on things for now.

In addition: The homes of 15 of the 20 Sandy Hook child victims, 1-2 of the 7 adult victims, and all 6 of the Sandy Hook adult non-victims (the Phelps, Gene Rosen, the three Selectmen) have the mysterious sale date of 12/25/2009 at a $0 sale price. In my research I find this indicates the amount reflects a title change where no money was exchanged, and is often used when a home/property mortgage are paid off in “full” (that is, when the title official reverts to the owner rather than to the bank).

The real "Robbie Parker" expresses his contempt

“Robbie Parker” expresses his contempt for the public

It is interesting that all these individuals paid off those properties at the exact same day. The only explanation that I can think of for such a vast number on the same date is that it was a mass payout of some sort to these individuals. We are investigating further to understand just how many of these individuals were invited to testify before congress in favor of gun control proposals by President Barack Obama, where the original conception for Sandy Hook appears to have come from him or Attorney General Holder, who visited Governor Malloy to fill him in on the plan on 27 November 2012.

The Sandy Hook hoax thus represents a triumph for the politics of cynicism over the politics of hope. But the Constitutionality of gun control measures appears to be complex, where The Gun Control Act of 1968 was nullified shortly after passing a hidden amendment for the purpose of preventing any successful challenge to its Constitutionality. The Court therefore could, and most likely would, ignore any attempt to secure a case ruling on it, because The Court knows full well that it was not properly passed. Even his Sandy Hook gambit appears unlikely to attain Barack Obama’s ultimate goal.

But it won’t be for lack of trying: “In his speech at the December 16 vigil, President Obama called for using ‘whatever power this office holds’, to prevent similar tragedies in the future. Nearly 200,000 people signed a petition at the Obama administration’s We the People petitioning website in support of stricter gun control legislation. President Obama later affirmed that he would make gun control a ‘central issue’ at the start of his second term of office, in a speech on December 19; signing 23 executive orders and proposing 12 congressional actions regarding gun control, one month after the shooting.”

Victoria Muramoto has taken a keen interest in investigative journalism, especially in relation to Sandy Hook.

Jim Fetzer, a former Marine Corps officer, is McKnight University Professor Emeritus at the University of Minnesota Duluth and a journalist and editor for Veterans Today.

Jim Fetzer

A former Marine Corps officer, Jim Fetzer has published widely on the theoretical foundations of scientific knowledge, computer science, artificial intelligence, cognitive science, and evolution and mentality.McKnight Professor Emeritus at the University of Minnesota Duluth, he has also conducted extensive research into the assassination of JFK, the events of 9/11, and the plane crash that killed Sen. Paul Wellstone.

The founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, his latest books include The Evolution of Intelligence (2005), The 9/11 Conspiracy (2007), Render Unto Darwin (2007), and The Place of Probability in Science (2010).

Related Posts:

The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT or any other VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors or partners and technicians. LEGAL NOTICE - COMMENT POLICY

Posted by on May 14, 2014, With 0 Reads, Filed under Of Interest, WarZone. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Comments Closed

139 Responses to "School closed, actors used: Robbie Parker, entertainer, exposed"

  1. Jim Fetzer  June 4, 2014 at 12:13 pm

    This is an embarrassing post from someone who might as well be a shill. No children died at Sandy Hook. I have looked at this from every possible angle and it never added up. If you have not listened to Paul Preston’s interview with Sofia Smallstorm, do yourself a favor and get up-to-speed, because you are making yourself look like a loon. We went to the Newtown School Board meeting to explain why we are concerned, not in the expectation of having any questions answered. Everywhere we went, we received confirmation of a massive cover-up. I am stunned by this comment, which is ignorant in the extreme. Check out “The Newtown School Board meeting and the meaning of silence”, for example, or listen to “False Flags 9/11, Sandy Hook and the Boston bombing” at radiofetzer.blogspot.com.

  2. Jim Fetzer  May 21, 2014 at 7:39 am

    Well, we DIDN’T demand an affidavit, so you need to get your facts straight. We thought we had nailed one of the perps who has terrified the nation with a mock terror drill. When we realized we were mistaken, we corrected immediately the record. I don’t think there is any justification for you to be on your high-horse, especially when you don’t seem to know the score.

    Photo analysis is a hazardous pastime. After John Matthew Walker wrote to us, we responded with a series of very elementary questions. I would like to say that he was direct and forthcoming, but that is not the case. He was evasive and even deceptive, which reinforced our belief that we might have our man. Providing an affidavit was one straightforward way to resolve it.

  3. jake gittes  May 20, 2014 at 10:37 am

    Ingrid, they are also blissfully unaware that they will be among the very first to be thrown under the bus by their handlers when the SHTF.

  4. jake gittes  May 20, 2014 at 10:06 am

    The origin of the slippery one’s terminology “Shibboleth” comes as no big surprise.

    From Wiktionary;

    “From Hebrew שבולת (šibbōlet, “ear of wheat”), with reference to Judges 12 5-6 ‘Gilead then cut Ephraim off from the fords of the Jordan, and whenever Ephraimite fugitives said, “Let me cross,” the men of Gilead would ask, “Are you an Ephraimite?” If he said, “No,” they then said, “Very well, say Shibboleth.” If anyone said “Sibboleth”, but could not pronounce it, they would then seize him and kill him by the fords of the Jordan.’ (New Jerusalem Bible)”

    It figures such a foul legend about the tribe’s narcissistic, self-proclaimed exclusivity would so readily come to the mind of an A-hole desperately trying to stuff a cat back in a bag. The more the truth is revealed, the more the liars scream LIE. Your slip is showing, Slippery.

  5. Jim Fetzer  May 16, 2014 at 8:40 pm

    I suspect they are fabricating all kinds of documents and records after having been caught with their pants down. However, those who were sticking up for John Matthew Walker appear to have been correct on the basis of new evidence. I no longer believe that he was in Sandy Hook playing the role of “Robbie Parker”. See “Sandy Hook and the real ‘Robbie Parker’, SpotterRF, the DHS and the CIA”.

    • LC  May 16, 2014 at 9:23 pm

      Thanks Doc.
      I specially saw your new pictures of Parker. They don’t seem to be same guy!
      Ears are the best markers & they’re very different. Almost everyone has lookalikes but ears can’t look the same on the lookalikes either.
      Some years back there was a contest for General Schwarzkopf lookalikes (according to one of the contenders I saw in a supermarket). His resemblance was unimaginable – just probably one foot shorter & smaller !!!

  6. potai  May 16, 2014 at 4:59 pm

    Enjoyed reading this article. Jim F, thanks for your bravery and integrity.
    I knew SH was a fraud from the beginning. There was something in the gut that didn’t sit well. Still doesn’t.
    Sometimes the intellect wants to step in and overrule the gut. Hey, I went to a professional (science) presentation a couple of years ago where there was a group in the audience that couldn’t abide the results. Screamed ‘Fraud’ to high heaven, they did. I still think about this odd display that I witnessed. I had to come to the conclusion that the ‘Ministry of Truth’ is well organized. Some of those making comments here seem to be protesting way too much.

  7. Emma Yacht  May 16, 2014 at 4:25 pm

    Note to Crisis actors … you are sadly wasting your lives in this timeline, bringing little added value to the multiverse. Crisis acting is a gateway drug to hardcore gang-stalking, …as you “stalk society” with your false scripts in hand. A Cosmic reset will be doled out in due time, and I wouldn’t want to be in your shoes. But no… not by a long shot are we, “ONE”. You have chosen to be with the Adversary.

  8. Gordon Duff  May 16, 2014 at 4:22 pm

    Homerun for Fetzer. I had my doubts, though I guess I shouldn’t have. Fetzer nails these bastards and they deserve it.

  9. Jim Fetzer  May 16, 2014 at 3:52 pm

    No. Adopting a series of false premises does not justify claiming that your conclusion is true. Have you never studied logic?

    And projecting your own qualities in research onto me does not make them true of me, even though they are clearly true of you.

  10. Ty Pearson  May 16, 2014 at 1:29 pm

    You can also type in Sandy Hook into an FB search and find links to hundreds of people who live there and have children who went to the school over the past decade. There are many charities set up in the names of the dead children who you mock with your lies. Events attended by thousands in the community every year who knew these children and share their heartfelt remembrances on those pages. You can find pictures of children at the school on parent’s FB pages who don’t block them. This took me about 15 minutes of back breaking research. Live in the real world. Our government isn’t HYDRA.

    • Jim Fetzer  May 16, 2014 at 1:42 pm

      Ty, you are submitting dozens of pointless posts, which I have been deleting. In any fabricated event like this, there will invariable be apparently confirming evidence. These guys are perps and they aren’t stupid, but they do make mistakes and get “off script”. One of the most stunning examples is that The Newtown Bee published an article quoting Principal Dawn Hochsprung stating that “a masked man entered the school with a rifle” and that the shooting “went on and on”. It would turn out that, according to the official story, she had been among the first, if not the first, persons killed.

      So The Newtown Bee gamely published a retraction on the basis that someone had impersonated Dawn and given them the story, presumably in real time. Does anyone in the world buy that? SOMEONE IMPERSONATING THE PRINCIPAL CALLED IN WITH A REPORT ABOUT A SHOOTING AT SANDY HOOK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL? Moreover, when the reporter for insanemedia tried to speak with Shannon Hicks, she demurred and referred him to the Editor, Curtiss Clark. When he asked how the communication had been made, Mr. Clark hinted that it had actually been done face-to-face!

      Now this is one of those REVEALING INCIDENTS that blows the cover of the official story–rather like the FBI Memorandum from J. Edgar Hoover that someone was impersonating Lee Oswald in Mexico City. If that were all you knew about the assassination of JFK, you would know enough to realize it was a conspiracy to frame him. And if all you knew were that The Newtown Bee fumbled this story, you would know enough to know that the Sandy Hook shooting has to have been a fraud involving The Newtown Bee. So I know you are upset that I have deleted so many of your posts but, sad to say, they only reflect that you are a gullible sap. I’ve been doing what I can to spare you embarrassment.

    • Ty Pearson  May 16, 2014 at 1:51 pm

      Really? People impersonate people for a myriad of reasons ALL THE TIME. Ever heard of Manti Teo and his fake girlfriend? Ever heard of the movie and TV show “Catfish”? Remember the guy who said he was Sidney Poitier’s son so he could enter the inner circles of the New York entertainment elite? Ever seen the movie “Catch Me If You Can”? Some people do it for monetary gain, some people do it because they are lonely, some people do it as a joke and others do it for the fame. Yet, again, this is simply evidence of shoddy journalism, something you should be thoroughly familiar with, and not a huge hoax.

    • Jim Fetzer  May 16, 2014 at 1:59 pm

      I am going to let this one stand, because it displays that you REALLY ARE a gullible sap. In an upscale community like Sandy Hook, you are saying that it would be reasonable to suppose that SOMEONE WOULD CALL IN, CLAIMING TO BE THE PRINCIPAL, AND REPORT THE SHOOTING OF CHILDREN AT A SANDY HOOK SCHOOL? I am incredulous. What kind of people do you think you are dealing with here? I will let the rest of the readers draw their own conclusion, but in my opinion you have now completely discredited yourself and revealed your true character.

    • Ty Pearson  May 16, 2014 at 2:02 pm

      It could even be none of the above. Maybe the newspaper editor told the reporter that she better get a quote from the principal for her story, so she just made it up. Maybe the reporter got the quote from someone she only thought was the principal, but was wrong. Maybe, in the mass confusion of a horrible tragedy the likes of which I’m sure the reporter had never seen, she thought she asked the person if she was the principal but she didn’t. I could list another 50 possible scenarios that don’t involve a cover up. See how that works? Newspapers goof up and have to retract things all of the time. More so nowadays in this era of shoddy journalism than ever before. It’s not shocking. When are forced to do this in a few days should we assume it’s because of a massive conspiracy or that you made an error?

    • Jim Fetzer  May 16, 2014 at 2:14 pm

      Then why didn’t the editor of The Newtown Bee explain that when he was being interviewed about the story? Why did he instead imply that the information had actually come from the principal, face-to-face, with The Bee’s reporter? You are just great at inventing possibilities but when it comes down to the facts of the case, you haven’t a clue. But you have done a great job exposing yourself as a faux-student of Sandy Hook and a bona fide shill for the official account. That is now abundantly clear. I hope you won’t mind if I don’t publish any more of your fanciful speculations. We’ve read enough.

    • Ty Pearson  May 16, 2014 at 2:25 pm

      Please explain to me why you one of your colleagues has been unable to find one person in a town of 28,000 people of different religious, political and ideological backgrounds who can back up one of your claims? You think the government convinced/coerced every single Republican, Democrat, Christian, Jew, Muslim, independent, atheist, and Libertarian to tell the exact same story? There isn’t one person out of 28,000 willing to tell the truth? That’s your stance?

    • Tom Smith  May 16, 2014 at 2:21 pm

      Hey Jim, when you are done insulting those of us who actually have a brain try providing the truth not some crap you choose to post. That women did NOT claim to be the Principal, the reporter admitted to have made a mistake in calling her the Principal, HUGE difference. Now go check your facts and stop claiming you have such great evidence. It’s laughable…….

    • Jim Fetzer  May 16, 2014 at 2:36 pm

      Tom, you can’t be serious. You have a reporter reporting what the principal said to her, but she was mistaken in identifying her as the principal? And now we have The Editor of The Newtown Bee intimating that it had been face-to-face. Is it too much for you to appreciate that OF COURSE the reporter is going to try to cover-up her gaffe.

      But listen. I completely agree one of us is a gullible sap. Gee, I wonder which of us that would be?

      And, of course, who cares about the missing 600 children, the missing school buses, and all that? Has it crossed your mind that Gene Rosen also blew it? No school bus driver would even let children off at any home other than that of their parents or guardians. Perhaps you think that Gene Rosen was each of those six children’s parent or guardian?

      You talk about having a functioning brain. I have yet to see any indications of that from you and these othes.

    • Ty Pearson  May 16, 2014 at 2:41 pm

      You think you can crawl into the mind of a school bus driver who was helping 6 kids escape a shooting? Do you think he was concerned with official bus protocol at that point? Really? Why don’t you ask him instead of merely speculate. It’s called journalism!

    • Jim Fetzer  May 16, 2014 at 2:48 pm

      One more proof that you are only here to harass and obfuscate. NO BUS DRIVER WOULD HAVE LET KIDS OUT AT A HOME UNLESS IT WERE THAT OF THEIR PARENT AND GUARDIAN. And where did the bus come from? There should have been at least a dozen to evacuate 600 other children. And where were the teachers, the custodians, the cooks and the bottle-washers? You must have been dumbest kid in your school. THE DUMBEST.

    • Ty Pearson  May 16, 2014 at 3:07 pm

      So the backbone of your argument is your inspired belief in the competency of bus drivers and their strict adherence to their bus driver code?

      http //thestir.cafemom.com/in_the_news/172446/bus_driver_arrested_for_making

      http //www.koat.com/news/new-mexico/aps-bus-driver-arrested-fired/25045806

      http //krqe.com/2014/03/17/aps-bus-driver-arrested-after-driving-recklessly/

      Above are links to bus drivers who molested students, drove recklessly and used drugs while on the job. But you think it’s an impossibility a bus driver might’ve let the students stay at someone’s house in the middle of a shoot out?

    • Jim Fetzer  May 16, 2014 at 3:21 pm

      This is another manifestation of your ignorance of Sandy Hook. They CARE about their children and their schools. You had to search high and low across the country to come up with those incidents. Especially in an emergency, a bus driver would simply not act as you suggest. You are grasping after straws. But then you don’t seem to understand that Gene Rosen was deeply involved in the deception. See, for example, “Wolfgang Halbig heads for Newtown in pursuit of the truth about Sandy Hook”, where the former top psychiatrist for the FBI, whom I know personally, offers his assessment of the claims made by Gene Rosen about that day, which is that they are simply not credible. I suspect he was used to convey the subtle impression that busses has been used, which does not appear to be the case. Read the article and give this more thought.

    • ptwang  May 18, 2014 at 11:45 pm

      there’s a lot of dodgy evidence but the police declaring everybody dead in minutes which they aren’t authorised to do and not allowing the EMT into the building? that’s just ridiculous.

  11. Jim Fetzer  May 16, 2014 at 1:18 pm

    Well, this is most interesting. There are some photos which could have been taken anywhere that are supposed to be from Sandy Hook. And some other records which were probably set up for someone like this to respond to the evidence. Watch this video for an overview of some of the problems: https //www.youtube.com/watch?v=d1kk0L2DOFo

    Notice none of this overcomes that the parking area and inside the school are not ADA compliant, that the school was being used for storage, and that it was loaded with asbestos and other bio-hazards, not to mention the missing 600 children, the absence of busses to evacuate them, no EMTs/ambulances/Med-Evac choppers, the early CTP chopper and such.

    Are we supposed to forget that the Final Report from the Connecticut State Police omits the names, ages and sex of the alleged victims? that the Clerk of Newtown entered into secret negotiations with the legislature to avoid releasing death certificates? that the Attorney General attempted to suppress the release of the 911 calls? Just how dumb are we supposed to be?

    No one in their wildest dreams would imagine that they would not plant fake stories to mislead the weak-minded. What is most telling is the absence of articles in the state newspapers reporting on activities at Sandy Hook Elementary School (cookie sales, Teacher of the Year awards, student productions and the like). That the School Board and The Newtown Bee were complicit is beyond debate, so these forms of “proof” do not overcome the totality of the evidence.

    • Jim Fetzer  May 16, 2014 at 1:54 pm

      OK. Tell us what the Wayback Machine does? It goes back and recovers old pages no longer easily accessible. If it finds that there is an absence of computer activity across a sample of attempts for a web site, then it is a reasonable (statistical) inference that there was no activity during that interval. You love to pretend that that is the ONLY PROOF we have that the school was not operational from 2008-2012, but I have REPEATEDLY EXPLAINED that that inference is supported from multiple sources, including that it was not ADA compliant at the time of the shooting, that videos inside the building show it was being used for storage, and that it was loaded with asbestos and other bio-hazards, as even The Newtown Bee reported. Additionally, there were no articles about activities for Sandy Hook Elementary School in state newspapers during that period, even though activities for other schools were being reported. I know you know you are ignoring the totality of the evidence, because that is what used-car salesmen, politicians and ops do. But we are pursuing the truth about Sandy Hook, while you are attempting to obfuscate it. I am sorry, but you are living up to your name.

    • Jim Fetzer  May 16, 2014 at 2:21 pm

      Where were those articles published? in what newspapers and on what dates? and if there are some from 2010, why are there none, as others have informed us, from 2008, 2009, 2011 and 2012? In fact, we have been informed by more than one source that they had done a thorough search and could find none for any of those years, including 2010. So why are we supposed to take your claim as credible?

    • Jim Fetzer  May 16, 2014 at 2:31 pm

      What could be easier to fake? It even has a line that could effortlessly have been cleansed

      Check box if this facility is no longer used for school purposes __ Year facility closed __

      If it was operational, why was it not ADA compliant? Why was it loaded with asbestos and other

      bio-hazards? No children should have been there. And where are the missing 600 other kids?

    • Ty Pearson  May 16, 2014 at 2:38 pm

      You seem to admit the school was open before 2008. To the best of my knowledge all schools across the country should have been ADA compliant well before then. So what you’re really saying is since the school didn’t update their compliance in those 4 years, when it should have been done a decade or more before that, it proves it wasn’t open. See how that makes no sense?

    • Jim Fetzer  May 16, 2014 at 2:52 pm

      Sandy Hook is a very meticulous community. VERY UP-SCALE. Their soccer fields are well-kept to the last blade of grass. The inside and the outside of this school were disgraceful. They had pulled one commode out of a stall to make it look ADA-compliant, when it was not. The parking designations were not current and the signage was missing. It was laden with asbestos and bio-hazards, as even The Newtown Bee reported. It’s embarrassing that you are making so many efforts to explain away the evidence. You are a joke. NO CHILD SHOULD HAVE BEEN IN THAT SCHOOL. NOT ONE. NONE.

    • Ty Pearson  May 16, 2014 at 3:13 pm

      My house is in a pretty nice neighborhood. I don’t mow my lawn nearly as frequently as my neighbors, but I still live there. Again – it proves nothing.

    • Jim Fetzer  May 16, 2014 at 3:24 pm

      There you go again, Ty one silly remark compounded by another. I have been there and your claims are simply absurd. Why are you here? The obvious answer: merely to harass me. Enough!

    • Jim Fetzer  May 16, 2014 at 3:30 pm

      It’s “The Newtown Bee”, not “the NewtonBee”. Really. Your writing is just as sloppy as your thinking. The Bee was in on it. Have you even read my earlier studies of this issue, such as “Sandy Hook Elementary School: closed in 2008, a stage in 2012″, where I have embedded several videos of the inside and the outside of the school? They make your posts look ignorant and contrived, which, of course, they are. Again, you and Ty seem to have nothing better to do than to “spit ball” based upon your ignorance of the evidence.

    • Ty Pearson  May 16, 2014 at 3:32 pm

      You don’t enjoy harassment? You mean like the baseless harassment you and Victoria have dished out to my good friend for no good reason? You see, however, I have a reason. It sucks, doesn’t it?

    • Jim Fetzer  May 16, 2014 at 3:37 pm

      We have told John Matthew Walker that if he will identify his attorney and send us an affidavit that he was not in Sandy Hook as “Robbie Parker”, then we will gladly correct the record and publish a retraction. Today, instead, he stood up Victoria on a prearranged phone call and made photos of himself invisible on his web site, which we both found rather peculiar. If he is indeed your friend, then why don’t you tell him that it will be simple to resolve this by means of such an affidavit and tell us where he was from 10-20 December 2014. Then you will have the resolution you want and we can continue to pursue the truth about Sandy Hook by having falsified one theory about it. But at least you have come clean: your motivation is not truth but instead revenge for slighting your friend.

    • Ty Pearson  May 16, 2014 at 3:36 pm

      Once again you speak in generalities. You have no idea how competent the bus driver was. None. You seem to think parents would actually be mad if a bus driver helped students vacate a school where a shooting occurred and took them to a safe home. I would’ve bought the bus driver a new car if he had done this for my son. And once again, whether or not the bus driver was in the right or the wrong, it proves absolutely nothing.

    • Jim Fetzer  May 16, 2014 at 3:41 pm

      No, it proves that you are willing to entertain any claim, no matter how ridiculous, in your effort to harass me, which you have now publicly admitted. Get a life! No bus driver is going to drop off kids at a random location. Who knows but what the occupant might be a serial rapist, a child molester, or a worshipper of Satan, looking for a new child to sacrifice. You reasoning is so perverted that no one could possibly take you seriously. He was not their parent or guardian–and his testimony about all of this was not even credible, as the former top shrink for the FBI has explained.

    • Ty Pearson  May 16, 2014 at 3:47 pm

      So only bus drivers from poor communities can make faulty decisions? Is this your claim? If I provide another three links of bus drivers from more affluent areas not upholding the bus driver code of awesomeness would it convince that ONE person could have made a bad decision?

    • Jim Fetzer  May 16, 2014 at 4:00 pm

      Your posts are redundant and ridiculous. But this is not According to the official reports released by the State of Connecticut, all victims of the Sandy Hook Elementary School shootings were autopsied. The recently released death certificate of Noah Pozner reflects information that is contradictory to the official report as it indicates that no autopsy was performed. See “Autopsies – Contradiction between Official Report and Noah Ponzer’s death certificate”, https //www.youtube.com/watch?v=LvW6ikXfiU4

You must be logged in to post a comment Login