Jim W. Dean is managing editor of Veterans Today wearing many hats from day to day operations, development, writing and editing articles.

He has an active schedule of TV and radio interviews

He is co-host of the popular VT Radio show Jim and Gordie Show.

Jim comes from an old military family dating back to the American Revolution. Dozens of Confederate ancestors fought for the South in the War Between the States. Uncles fought in WWII and Korea. His father was a WWII P-40 and later P-51 Mustang fighter pilot. Vietnam found several uncles serving, a cousin, and brother Wendell as a young Ranger officer. His mother was a WWII widow at 16, her first husband killed with all 580 aboard when the SS Paul Hamilton, an ammunition ship with 7000 tons of explosives aboard, was torpedoed off the coast of Algiers.

He has been writing, speaking and doing public relations, television, consulting and now multimedia work for a variety of American heritage, historical, military, veterans and Intel platforms. Jim's only film appearance was in the PBS Looking for Lincoln documentary with Prof. Henry Lewis Gates, and he has guest lectured at the Army Command and General Staff School at Fort Gordon.

Currently he is working to take his extensive historical video archives on line to assist his affiliated organizations with their website multimedia efforts, such as the Military Order of World Wars, Atlanta, Sons of the American Revolution, Sons of Confederate Veterans , Assoc. for Intelligence Officers, the Navy League, Georgia Heritage Council, National Memorial Assoc.of Georgia.


View Latest Posts >>>

NEO – Ukrainian Elections: EU Membership May be a Mirage

image

Ukrainian Elections: “Close” Is Not Good Enough for EU Membership

… by  Seth Ferris, … with  New Eastern Outlook, Moscow

 

The seven golden domes of St. Petersburg

The seven golden domes of St. Petersburg

[ Editors commentary: The Ukraine coup continues to be a zoo, and continued failure will be nothing new. Its Western backers intent on their takeover of another struggling country will accept whatever the results, while if the winner had been pro-Russian they would have screamed election fraud and cancelled the loan agreements.

There are supposed to be 2800 outside monitors on station to report on the voting Sunday, but the validity of the vote has already been tarnished with a long list of abuses, not the least of which has been conducting military operations against separatist protesters.

If East Ukraine loses this fight we will all be in a bit more dangerous position of unchallenged aggression usually gains momentum.

Poor Ukraine has a long struggle ahead of it, with the Balkanization process already in play. The economy is imploding and Kiev seems confident of its Western backing to stiff arm the Eastern breakaways states.  This is a sad stain on the West, one that leaders never really pay for when the pendulum swings back. We do…. Jim W. Dean ]

_____________________________

– First published May 24, 2014

 

Shaking the bloody hands

Shaking the bloody hands

Now the world’s eyes are on Ukraine for a new reason. The latest round of Kiev instigated bloodletting in the Russian-populated east of the country is finally starting to be overshadowed, by the May 25 presidential elections.

They are gaining attention because elections are supposed to be the opposite of bloodletting. We have seen Ukraine go in one direction but can it suddenly swing in the other?

The EU is of course weighing in, but not by trying to guarantee free and fair elections, as might be expected. Its contribution to Ukraine’s democratisation has been to suggest that once the elections are held the country will then be a step closer to EU membership.

Really? Turkey has regular elections, why is it not in the EU? Did not the outgoing President of the European Commission, José Manuel Barroso say on May 21 that Georgia, which was long told that it would accede to the EU and NATO together with Ukraine, will not be accepted into the EU?

Georgia has a freely elected government which campaigned on a platform of prosecuting the previous one for its many crimes, as they would be for similar crimes in an EU country. It is about to sign an Association Agreement with the EU, which Brussels would not sign with the previous government. But it is not going to be offered EU membership in the foreseeable future. So Ukraine in its present state will get closer, will it?

Barroso also reiterated the EU’s support for the upcoming presidential elections, saying that they are of great importance in stabilising the situation in Ukraine. It was, of course, during Barroso’s term of office that the destabilisation of the country began, in response to Ukraine refusing the EU’s ultimatum to either turn its back on Russia completely or forget about EU assistance.

It has also, with its US allies, undermined two previous Ukrainian presidential elections, at the time and after the fact, in order to remove the elected man it doesn’t like, Yanukovych.

_________________________

Close is not good enough

Emerging candidates in Ukraine

Emerging candidates in Ukraine

The Ukraine elections are an attempt to give legitimacy to illegitimacy by turning the removal of the democratically-elected government into a popular uprising rather than an externally orchestrated coup. The EU wants everyone to believe that if people vote for the putschists, regardless of what other choice they are offered, their actions must be right.

Is it an Orange Revolution, once again? What happened to that scheme? The next election, Ukrainians elected Yanukovych, who the revolution had sought to sweep away. How the installation of a new regime can be called a “revolution” when the old regime is re-elected at the first opportunity is something for the compilers of dictionaries to decide.

The Ukrainian elections are thus an exercise in Potemkin Democracy, the very thing EU membership, with its obligation to accept Western democratic rules, is supposed to stop. But, as always, everything is being considered acceptable as long as it results in EU membership.

Once they’re accepted into the EU all will be OK, Ukrainians are being told. All they have to do is play by the rules. The EU has set those rules: take part in the elections, vote for the people we have supported and not those we have demonised and all will be well.

Little things like not intimidating voters, equalising media time and campaign spending and ensuring plurality of choice, hallmarks of the EU’s democracies, do not matter as long as the process is followed and the EU gives its seal of approval.

But as we have seen in Georgia, which is actually closer to EU membership than Ukraine, what will the outcome be? Ukraine will justify the EU’s political position by electing those it sees as representing it, but will still not be given actual membership in return.

_________________________

All about gas

Will the coup-meisters EU gamble pay off?

Will the coup-meisters EU gamble pay off?

As part of its campaign to gain legitimacy for the new Ukrainian regime, the EU is trying to avoid discussion of the political background to these elections, or indeed any ideological discussion.

It is trying to divert attention to more practical issues, like paying its bills for gas, as if the choice of the Ukrainian people will be a purely rational one, not motivated by dreams of EU membership and visa free travel throughout Europe.

In a recent letter to President Vladimir Putin, available online Jose Manuel Barroso wrote, on behalf of the EU and its 28 Member States, that the EU is ready to continue substantive trilateral discussions in order to ensure the stabilisation of gas supplies to Ukraine and gas deliveries via Ukraine into the EU, and help find a rapid and sustainable solution acceptable to all parties.

“It is the European Union’s clear expectation that all sides will remain reliable and responsible supply and transit partners, which is also very much in their own interest. The European Union and other international donors have already provided significant support to Ukraine and will remain committed. I also expect a constructive approach from the Russian Federation to solve the issues at hand.”

This letter should be read in the context of what has gone before. If Russia wanted to recall Ukraine’s arrears to Gazprom it could turn off the taps immediately, and has a right to do so under the terms of the gas supply agreements.

Yanukovych - a man in limbo

Yanukovych – a man in limbo

As Ukraine remains dependent on Russian gas it has to find some way of cohabiting with Russia, like it or not. Nothing the EU offered in its Association Agreement negotiations with Yanukovych changed that, and nor could it, with the Eurozone in the crisis it is in.

Yanukovych therefore tried to accept help from both sides, a situation neither were happy with, but resulted in the EU, not Russia, giving him an ultimatum to put all his eggs in one basket.

Now the EU will say that Ukrainian voters still want exclusive adherence to the EU despite the gas issue, because it has been thoroughly discussed in this campaign and an EU-favored candidate has still won.

With Ukraine and Russia having come to being on the verge of war over Crimea, what would be the consequence of electing a pro-Russian candidate, or supporting the actual elected president, Yanukovych? Is there really any choice but to support an EU-favoured candidate?

But, as often happens in Western democracies, people will vote for one reason and then be told that they have supported something else entirely, which was part of the programme but nothing to do with why that candidate was supported.

_________________________

Narrow field of candidates

Right Sector boss Yarosh

Right Sector boss Yarosh

Aside from a handful of candidates, such as businessman Petro Poroshenko, the line up of prospective presidents is not impressive, especially to the locals, as their sordid histories are only too well known. There are approximately 20 candidates, but many of them are too familiar faces.

The election is more likely to be decided by who is least popular than who is most popular, as voters will support the person they think is best placed to defeat the one they most dislike.

Yulia Tymoshenko – once jailed for her involvement in shady gas deals with Russia and famous for her threats to solve the Ethnic Russian Question by nuking them, is also on the ballot. The situation has evolved into a proverbial tug of war between those that want to protect their Russian culture and language, found predominately in the East and the Nationalist who have been supported and egged on by the West, especially the United States.

However there are already signs that Ukraine’s voters are, even in this constricted circumstance, not willing to follow the script. The vast majority are distancing themselves from extremist nationalists like Oleh Tiahnybok, from the Svoboda party, and Dmitry Yarosh, from Right Sector, because of their activities during the Euromaidan protests and their provoking of many needless and brutal deaths.

These are the protests the West told the world were about joining the EU, which these inserted nationalists should be the main beneficiaries of.

There are the "get out the vote" boys

There are the “get out the vote” Svoboda boys

The EU is now embarrassed by these far rightists too, but not so much that it wouldn’t treat their election as a validation of itself.

Of the other candidates, the most prominent is former Orange Revolution Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko, later jailed for her involvement in shady gas deals and famous for her threats to solve the Ethnic Russian Question by nuking them.

Her election would put Ukraine back to square one and stoke further crisis, so she is not a serious contender while the people still see violence on their doorstep.

Indeed, Ukraine is now in the same situation as Georgia in this respect: it wants the idea of the EU, but not the reality. In practice, the EU has meant destabilisation just as much as modern Russia has.

It was Russia’s attempt to help prevent Ukraine defaulting – to Western banks and the IMF – by agreeing to provide 15 billion in direct economic relief which set off the alarm bells in Brussels and Washington.

It was the subsequent Western response to this offer, not the offer itself, which created virtual civil war, and the most pro-Western Ukrainians have not forgotten this.

_________________________

So what happens next?

Poroshenko was virtually unknown in the West before this campaign began, but has now become news because both the US and EU already appear to regard his victory as the most likely outcome.

Forbes puts his net wealth at $1.3bn – initially derived from his chocolates, which have earned him the nickname of “the chocolate king”, but now including income from other interests in shipbuilding, construction and media.

His emergence as a candidate is very reminiscent of the parachuting in of fellow billionaires Bidzina Ivanishvili in Georgia and Milan Panic in former Yugoslavia. As in those cases, the glamour of wealth is likely to make all politicians seem petty and venal and ensure his victory.

As in those cases, he has been sponsored for the presidency precisely because he is a “none-of-the-above” candidate in a country with too many who stood for office before got to do so by being darlings of the EU.

Will the elections bring stability, as the EU suggests? Very unlikely! The turnout will be much higher in Western Ukraine than in Eastern, as most of the ethnic Russian population no longer feel that Ukraine has anything to do with them. They will likely boycott the elections as they don’t claim to be part of Ukraine anymore.

But this will create a vacuum which many forces will be keen to exploit – everyone has their own idea of what a fully Western Ukraine should be like, and the absence of the Russian electorate will give them carte blanche to try and claim the whole of what remains of the country to themselves, a common post-change scenario.

Putin stated on 23 May that he will respect the will of the Ukrainian people. If he keeps his word, this will do more to stabilise Ukraine than anything the EU is doing, as it will clear a pathway for resolution of the conflict by giving a new, recognised Ukrainian team the chance to do so and a voice to the Ukrainians who look to Russia.

This may, ultimately, bring about an outcome acceptable to most Ukrainians. It would be nice if, at the third time of asking, the EU also accepted that Ukrainians have a right to conduct their own affairs, like EU member states.

_________________________

Elections exercise in wishful thinking

Ukraine attack helicopters strafe their own checkpoint at battle

Ukraine helicopters strafe their own checkpoint after battle

Just what will change once the ballots are counted in Ukraine is the question that few are asking, and if holding elections will make any difference in the first place.

There is not going to be a military intervention on the horizon by Russian Federation or wholesale annexation of the ethnic Russian part of the country, as in the Eastern region which borders the RF.

It is a question even if the East (like those regions of Donetsk and Luhansk) will participate, and even if it did, what difference, if any, would it make in their lives and expectations for the future? It is even possible that elections will make a complicated issue even more so. The Geneva Roadmap documents seek for all sides to refrain from any violence.

As the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs has written:

“Without the implementation of the Geneva Roadmap Agreements, [of April 17] the road map, and the immediate cessation of hostilities by units of the Ukrainian Army in the southeast of the country, the May 25th Election can only worsen the situation.”

The document included how proposed constitutional process will be inclusive, transparent and accountable. It will include the immediate establishment of a broad national dialogue, with outreach to all of Ukraine’s regions and political constituencies, and allow for the consideration of public comments and proposed amendments.

The participants underlined the importance of economic and financial stability in Ukraine and would be ready to discuss additional support as the above steps are implemented. The key issue is if all stakeholders to the agreement are serious, as it calls for all acts of violence must be promptly investigated and prosecuted.

The OSCE Monitoring Mission is setting up Rapid Response Teams with specific areas of expertise and will assist Ukrainian authorities upon request. The task of these teams is to establish and report facts on specific incidents. A hotline for alerting the Monitoring Mission should be running soon.

The document also stipulates that Ukraine may join any political or economic union on the condition that the majority of the population votes in favour in a nationwide referendum.

_________________________

Key Election Issue

The new government will have a problem distancing themselves from their political thugs

The new government will have a problem distancing themselves from their political thugs

The vast majority of the population are distancing themselves from the likes of extremist nationalists Oleh Tiahnybok from the Svoboda party and Dmitry Yarosh from Right Sector because of their activities in the Euromaidan protests and the ensuring destabilizing of the country and many needless and brutal deaths.

Key issues in this election will be to pick up again with European integration, and that too is a point that has people tired, and the start of the current debacle in Ukraine after the EU made an ultimatum that Kiev under former president Yanukovych in November of last year that started the unravelling of democracy and has put the territorial integrity of Ukraine at risk.

Russia was prepared to work with Ukraine and the EU and it had already agreed to provide 15 billion in direct economic relief to keep the country from going financially belly up—defaulting.

That set off the alarm bells in Brussels and Washington. Such close economic relations and was unacceptable to the EU and its Western supporters as a matter of policy. They forced Kiev to make a choice between the competing EU supported “Association Agreement and Russia’s Custom Union”.

EU did not provide the option for Ukraine to have it both ways. With the former president out of the picture and the EU and Ukraine’s interim authorities trying to make hay whilst the sun shines, the association agreement is back on the agenda. Already some protocols have been signed but the damage from the unrest and motivations for the crisis in the first place is becoming clear to Ukrainians.

Elections will solve little – perhaps provide some breathing space and give Ukrainians the time to reflect on who really has their best interests in mind. So don’t expect any significant changes and that Ukraine will be emerge from the elections as a unified country and Crimea will come crawling back to be part of the fold.

Wishful intentions and reality is another factor – and some lessons should be gleaned from the never ending promises of EU and NATO membership for Georgia, in terms of an interim association agreement and the promise of a NATO Membership Action Plan. The outcome of the election is pretty much a given, and there will be no surprises with the front runner most likely heading for a first-round win, if he is able to get more than 50 percent of the vote.

As reported in the Western Media, both the US and EU already appear to regard Poroshenko’s victory as the most likely outcome. Some pundits go as far as to claim that the Kremlin may view him as the most acceptable person, a person that Russia can deal with. He is also the most acceptable choice to all concerned, including the West, as the “none-of-the-above” candidate.

Seth Ferris, investigative journalist and political scientist, expert on Middle Eastern affairs, exclusively for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook.”

Editing: Jim W. Dean and Erica P. Wissinger

640x260_NEO_Moscow5

_______________________

Related Posts:



The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT, VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians, or the Veterans Today Network and its assigns. LEGAL NOTICE - COMMENT POLICY

Posted by on May 24, 2014, With 1690 Reads Filed under Europe, Russia, World. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

8 Responses to "NEO – Ukrainian Elections: EU Membership May be a Mirage"

  1. williammartin  May 25, 2014 at 7:30 pm

    Mr. Dean, I also forgot to thank you for the summery of these articles. I know the work you put into them was exhausting so thank you.

  2. williammartin  May 25, 2014 at 7:18 pm

    One thing I noticed is that Russia’s Putin who isn’t no dummy to US aggression as well as NATO (North Atlantic Terrorist Organization) is that he has stated repeatedly that the Ukraine what ever its diplomatic or political outcome is that NO Missiles will go into the Ukraine and rightly so…

    The world has seen the pure or total Hippocratic stance of the WEST but more so the USA as they use International law against others while ignoring it totally themselves. While trying to legitimize the Ukraine vote in a civil war they say, “The vote is legal.” While in Syria their “vote is illegal..” In any case, as long as their puppets are elected they don’t care about human rights or anything else. Just as the report of the Russia reporters death and his translator’s being beheaded. Sound like Syria doesn’t it?

    While the Ukraine maybe of importance there is still a few burning questions to have answered.

    Why isn’t the US Government doing anything about the Million’s of Starving, Homeless and Jobless American’s? Why isn’t this Administration doing a thing about Veteran’s dying while waiting for services? Are in fact or should I say, “Is this proof of the Death Panel’s we have heard about?

    Another question is for those currently serving, Our Veteran’s -and those who might think of Joining in the Armed Forces of America… What is your Future? Was Henry Kissinger right, that your all “Dumb Stupid Animal’s just to be used as Pawn’s in US Foreign policy?”

    Are Veteran’s “Domestic Terrorist’s?”

    • williammartin  May 25, 2014 at 7:26 pm

      I should also add Out of the 201 Wars or conflagrations the USA has “Started”… How many of these is the case in which the United States was actually attacked?

      As an example
      Say your Jewish and your a father of 3 strapping boys. You drive across town 8 miles and there kill 7 Priest’s in a “preemptive” move so as that the Clergy doesn’t molest your sons. Forget the fact that your Jewish and the priests are Catholic and that you had to physically drive 8 miles to a Church that neither you or your family attend services at.

      How many countries does the US have to destroy in preemptive moves against those that are of no risk to our security from 2,000 to 9,000 miles away? Our Congress won’t do a thing towards our social ill’s but is sure dead set on other countries problems. You can see the real reason that we as America are really hated.

  3. Cold Wind  May 25, 2014 at 7:47 am

    These elections are as phony as a three dollar bill. The outcome predictable within the given range of candidates provided by the IMF. For Putin to say he will accept the results is unconscionable, not to mention, acceptance of the results gives carte blanche to the Kiev psychopaths, who will now use their faux legitimacy in an much more intense effort to crush the resistance in the east. The people of eastern Ukraine deserve better from Putin!

  4. ProtectUSA1st  May 25, 2014 at 12:46 am

    —GOOD NEWS—NO WWW-3, thanks to Russia & China signing the “Biggest 400 “B” Gas Deal in the World” & current military-to-military drill, and Japan claimed China entered it’s airspace, but no action—The World Energy Associations said, as for Natural Gas, Oil & Coal Reserves—Russia 100 yrs. France & Italy 1 yr. each & UK 5 yr.

    —EU, USA & Ukraine will have Peace with Russia, since the World has changed 360 degree since November 2013—India member of (BRICS) the new PM told China he invited Pakistan PM to his Inauguration for the 1st in their history

    —Kissenger “The top USA Diplomat” said, demonizing Putin is not a plan, but a lake of it—EU & USA have no plan & don’t know what to do-they know the Ex-President Viktor Yanukovych is the legitimate one according to the Constitution

    —Crimea will be fine since 7-Ukraine Eastern Regions are joining forces—1st we have Nuke to Russian speakers-Tymoshenko is now behind, she is cursing Poroshenko “The Chocolate King” the Less Militant who is willing to talk to the East–will Win—so the Psycho Arseny Yatseniuk will be out.

    —NO-Poor-Ukraine will suffer for 8 yrs. to join EU—Germany & other will not accept it—Czech Republic just said “NO” to NATO Permanent Base—The Zionists are ISOLATED, they are busy messing up USA elections, Terrorizing Africa & South America & Iran since the Saudis plan a meeting, bagging for money from China & Japan.

    • williammartin  May 25, 2014 at 7:29 pm

      Like I have said also I await to see the first attempt that Kiev tries to install a Missile base for NATO.. It will be game over. Check Mate!

  5. davor  May 24, 2014 at 10:05 pm

    Spot on. There is nothing legitimate about these Ukrainian elections nor there is a turning point in the minds of people. It is a textbook murder of democracy and staging and prolonging the coup.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login


TOP 50 READ ARTICLES THIS MONTH
From Veterans Today Network