VT Nuclear Education: Undeniable Proof of 9/11 as a Nuclear Event

Unburied Truth Buries Lies

Cars from 9/11 destroyed by Nuclear EMP

Cars from 9/11 destroyed by Nuclear EMP

 

By Gordon Duff, Senior Editor and the NNP (Nuclear Non-Proliferation community)

 

“We may well be looking at the signature of a very “advanced” nuclear device  carefully set up to produce maximum radiation.”

The documentary evidence below was available to all years ago.  Some used it, what they could find of it.  The entire NNP community always knew 9/11 was a nuclear event.  They always knew nuclear weapons have been used continually as a handy solution that avoids the potential embarrassment of not having enough casualties or destruction during a state sponsored terror attack.  Getting nuclear weapons is so easy we could be selling them here.

One Suggestion

One Suggestion

We are beginning to enter new ground.  We are now finding evidence that stolen Cold War era nuclear weapons slated for destruction were stripped down, remachined and built into enhanced radiation weapons of advanced design so they could be used with impunity, New York, Bali, intended for London, Iraq and Afghanistan, Damascus and more.  Among the released information, the “leaks,” is key information regarding weapon design, more efficient fusion reactions and the ability to cover up nuclear terrorism through systematic disinformation campaigns through Hollywood that utterly misrepresent the endless capabilities and flexibility of nuclear demolitions.

There are also reports of weather manipulation, two hurricanes, which helped dispel radiation that would have wiped out half of New York instead of simply killing the thousands who have died “mysteriously” of “toxic pixie dust” so far and the 70,000 reported by the New York Daily News as having cancers any idiot knows are radiation sickness.

Again, with weather manipulation, we enter a new ground.  VT has published on weather manipulation on several occasions, successfully predicting impossible storm behavior.  We have seen typhoons blocked and hurricanes created and in one instance, the use of an energy weapon to stop a storm blasting a hole 30km into the earth’s surface causing a quake and nearly a tsunami.  We will begin publishing these documents too if we have to.

This is no accident.  Nuclear weapons are now the “go to” choice for terrorism and, as we had discovered long ago, there is no such thing as a multi-national terror organization that isn’t controlled by multiple national players using it to advance a globalist agenda.  Anyone who conceives of something else is dangerously deluded and teaching military, political and intelligence leaders how to deal with this threat is my corporate “day job.”

THE LIE FACTORY

All of this is lied about, how weapons work, the effects, how they are considered and how many of them, virtually hundreds, have fallen into real terrorist hands, governments including the rogue elements of dozens of governments loosely or “not so loosely” controlled under the successors the SSG (Secret Shadow Government) has chosen to carry the mantle of its Gladio operations.

 

Inexorable proof of nuclear demolition was always there and never questioned simply ignored

Inexorable proof of nuclear demolition was always there and never questioned simply ignored

Nuclear terror attacks are being planned today.  We will see them in the United States.  We have seen them before.  No doctor will every diagnose nuclear weapons radiation poisoning.  When Dr. Chris Busby did so in Iraq, his reports simply vanished from every place but Veterans Today.

If necessary, we will bombard the public with evidence until something happens.  We have anything and everything.  Funny how you can do something that should matter so much and watch it touch no one.  What we will do, at least, is end the blithering in the counter-terrorist communities and the various activist and truth movements.  My text ends here.  An apology to those whose work is included who shun publicity or are included through quotations in reports that have footnotes omitted.  This is unintentional and unavoidable.

Always known to be seismic waves created by nuclear demolition

Always known to be seismic waves created by nuclear demolition

Aerial photographs seem to bear out his supposition because “upwellings” of steam were pouring out of street gratings two and three blocks south of the WTC. As he commented about them:

Support for alternative nuclear weapon placement hypothesis, not "alternative" nuclear and not "sniffer dust"

Support for alternative nuclear weapon placement hypothesis, not “alternative” nuclear and not “sniffer dust”

Seismologists point out that Richter readings always come from Earth’s movements or explosives coupled to the ground, not from plane impacts on buildings or falling debris. Earthquakes rumble up to a climax and then decrease, but a sudden spike denotes a ground-planted explosive device. A look at charts in the endnotes from the Palisades station across the Hudson River shows sharp spikes of short duration, a hallmark for detecting any underground explosions whether from nearby quarry blasts or faraway nuclear testing.
“These upwellings are some distance from the WTC itself. Assuming there was an extensive underground facility or small city under Manhattan, there would have been a certain number of air vents and other exits to the surface. …[T]he force of the [nuclear] blast would have also been channelled through the underground corridors and hollow spaces, forcing dust and debris up into the atmosphere through these exits.” 

Inaccurate Effects of Nuclear Weapons Effects and Terrorism

Radioactive fallout found by the U.S. Geological Survey in samples from 35 sites surrounding the WTC for nearly a mile. Other signs were the speed of the Towers disintegrations (8 to 10 seconds), the shock and blast waves, the pyroclastic main cloud, base-surges of street-level dust clouds, electromagnetic pulses (EMPs), upwellings of clouds from street gratings blocks away, the 2,800ºF heat under the WTC debris, and, possibly, the giveaway light-blue Cerenkov Radiation when the debris “pile” was cleared in mid-March. Add to all these signs, the molten metal in the footprints of WTC 1, 2, and 7 that for three months could not be extinguished by water or daily soil changes as it consumed concrete, steel, glass, office combustibles. The increasing incidence of radiation-only cancers from residents is another tell-tale sign of a nuclear “event.”

Possibilities for Peaceful Nuclear Explosions

“We tend to look for a shattering explosive because we want to instantaneously remove the structural integrity of whatever we’re working on. So we would opt for nitroglycerin or NG-based dynamite. With a steel structure, we use something called a linear-shaped charge that concentrates the force of a high explosive called RDX. For example, it took 80 pounds of shaped charge to bring down two New York gas tanks built with 5 million pounds of steel.”

The nine-story WTC 5 suffered two gigantic holes that went straight through to the bottom-level basement. The hole in the eight-story WTC was 100 feet in diameter—and also dropped to the bottom basement. The nine-story WTC 4’s south wing was cleanly separated from the north wing which was flattened. Under the demolished wing was an equally large crater three stories deep. All the holes were strong indicators that explosions did hollow out basements for rubble. The slim 22-story WTC 3 (the Marriott hotel) had no holes, but WTC 2’s falling debris carved a “V” from roof to the third floor.

“If the zinc was indeed a fission product, the device that produced it must have been specifically engineered to produce it: This device then produced mostly neutrons and enhanced radiation fallout with a relatively small blast in comparison with the mass of fissile material present.

“We may well be looking at the signature of a very “advanced” nuclear device  carefully set up to produce maximum radiation.

Seismic evidence and witness statements indicate that high-yield explosives were used in basements of all buildings except the Marriott that morning to clear space for their remains. The Towers’ detonation and impact times were seconds apart, as Richter-scale data in the endnotes show.

Basement Levels 1-6 to Floor 30 with doors blown off hinges, and two fire-blackened people dying in that lobby. It is difficult to believe that a hit between the 94th-98th floors was responsible for that kind of damage to the lobby unless the aircraft had dropped a bomb into elevator shafts. “There was elevator doors ajar. There were elevator doors missing. I could see an elevator car twisted in the shaft….there was a bunch of rubble on the floor…about three feet high in the middle. The ceiling wasn’t charred. So I had thought the floor blew up….I came to learn that that was bodies. We had to climb over and around this pile.” 50-ton exterior column beams flung upward from Towers basements to pierce buildings such as the Deutsche Bank across from WTC 2 (15th floor), the American Express (17th-19th) and Verizon buildings across from WTC 1’s two sides. Timing between aircraft impacts and explosions had to be of the split-second variety to conceal basement detonations in the three skyscrapers. Seismographic data from the Palisade station across the Hudson River shows that seemed to have happened.

The six spikes—five that morning, one that afternoon—were startling and revealing. The temblors ranged from a magnitude of 0.7 to 2.3. Those listed as “unknown events” may have been explosions at WTC 4, 5, and 6. The times, events, and Richter-scale readings—including those for WTC 7—were:

Palisade Event Richter

Time Time Event Reading

8:46:26 am 8:45-46 am WTC 1 hit 0.9

9:02:54 am 9:03 am WTC 2 hit 0.7

9:59:04 am 9:59 am WTC 2 destroyed

[WTC 7 explosion?]2.1

10:28:31 am 10:28 am WTC 1 destroyed 2.3

11:15:04 am Unknown Near 1.0*

5:20:33 pm 5:20 pm WTC 7 collapse Near 2.3*

One Palisades seismologist interpreted the low readings on the first two aircraft impacts against the Towers:

“Since the main collapses, a major concern has been if strong shaking affected the structural stability of nearby buildings. [But] earthquakes of ML 2.3 are not known to cause any structural damage in buildings….”

It is well known in seismology that Impact Sources produce Low Frequency Waves while Explosive Sources produce High Frequency Waves. The Seismic Waves produced during the WTC collapse were High Frequency Waves—again indicating that they could not have been produced by the impact of rubble on the surface, but rather by an impulsive explosive source.” 

Using the Towers’ central steel cores as a “chimney” for vaporizing them within 8 and 10 seconds.

“…exploded violently and ejected pulverised concrete and rubble in all directions, followed by a pyroclastic flow of hot dust following the same pattern as the base surge of an underground nuclear explosion…. [An estimated 90,000 [tones of concrete in each tower was literally pulverised into dust, sand or grit-sized particles—an absolutely unprecedented event.

“This indicates that the forces on the concrete were so high, they exceeded its tensile strength…. by a factor of 300 or more…. and literally tore it apart.”

In other words, the nuclear “event” began by the violent upward thrust of the nuclear blast 150 feet per second. Its white-hot heat shot upward vaporizing the Towers’ interiors of concrete, steel, glass, combustibles—and people—into dust. Blowing to the top and out into the atmosphere, the tremendous energy flung its steaming load of vaporized materials skyward to become multi-colored pyroclastic clouds of dust and radioactive fuel. But the eruption’s energy, like volcanic lava and pyroclastic flows, sped downward vaporizing the buildings’ exteriors. Only mountains of flying paper and corroded aluminum cladding escaped.

Then, a natural phenomenon burst on the apocalyptic scene. A pair of hurricanes 300 miles off in the Atlantic Ocean—Erin (Class 3) boosted from the south by Gabrielle (tropical depression)—acted as vacuum cleaners to inhale the dust-packed clouds and exhale them off Greenland. It was a coincidence almost too extraordinary to be believed by some. They believe that weather manipulation has been achieved by the U.S. military.

Military-directed hurricanes or not, the explosive events happening in Lower Manhattan made Erin’s Class 3 status largely unknown except for those in its path off East Bermuda and crews from the National Hurricane Center. Erin lingered only for 9/11 and then was buffeted east by the cool, cleansing winds from Canada and Gabrielle’s swift push north from the Gulf and Florida. The two storms thus prevented air stagnation over New York City that could have exposed millions to radiation. The scale of a subsequent cancer epidemic would have left no doubt about nuclear devices destroying the Center.

Fallout (Uranium, Strontium, Barium, Zinc, and More) Detected by USGS

Measurements of chemical and mineralogical elements in dust samples gathered in and around Ground Zero were initiated by the U.S. Geological Survey six days after 9/11. Its airborne team photographed the thermal hotspots. Both missions used state-of-the-art equipment and agency facilities.

The ground team gathered samples during the evenings of September 17-18 from 35 sites in Lower Manhattan within a mile of the WTC’s circumference. Two were indoors samples, two from beams. Samples were taken from undisturbed places: window ledges, windshields, flower pots, and protected areas in entryways and stairs. Indoor samples came from a gymnasium and a 30th floor apartment. Tests revealed 42 elements.

Though a September 14 downpour might have had mitigating effects on ground-sample results, USGS researchers also mixed water with some particles for a second test (leaching). Aerial images revealed the expected high level of asbestos, but the agency’s report on both analyses was artfully crafted apparently not to alarm the public about nuclear evidence. It said that ground dust

“…although quite variable, reflects the chemical contributions of materials used in building construction or found in buildings, such as glass fibers, concrete, gypsum wallboard, steel girders, wiring, ductwork, electronics, computers, paper, and many others.

“The mean concentrations of some heavy metals in the WTC dust samples (such as antimony, molybdenum, zinc, copper, lead, chromium, manganese, nickel, and barium) are relatively high compared to their mean concentrations in natural soils from the eastern United States.”

The particles of barium, zinc, and lead, elements that never should have turned up in Lower Manhattan, caught the instant attention of those who were knowledgeable about fallout.

The elevated levels of nuclear particles omitted in the news release, but recorded in those tables: Uranium and its deadly offspring of strontium, barium, and zinc. Massive levels were found of strontium: 3,130 ppms as a maximum; 378 ppms as a minimum; and 726.61 ppms as the mean. In leaching tests, strontium’s minimum was a 561 ppms; the maximum, a staggering 1,690 ppms; a mean of 1,083.10 ppms. Other elements the USGS found were significantly rare for the area.

The location with the greatest concentration of nuclear pollutants, according to the data, was the southeast corner of Water Street and Coenties Slip, near the Brooklyn Bridge. It had the greatest levels of zinc (2,990 ppms) and the second highest levels of both strontium (1,000 ppms), and barium (765 ppms). The center for the highest levels of strontium (3,130 ppms) and barium (3,670) was at the intersection of Broadway and Dey, a block from the WTC’s eastern side. Even if those elements had been found in minuscule quantities, renown radiation experts such as Dr. John W. Gofman have warned for years:

The USGS’s 33 outdoor samples do indicate irrefutable signs of nuclear materials:

 

Barium and strontium are banned in construction materials because of toxicity. One construction expert wrote:

“Indeed, any building with these concentrations of the highly toxic (and in this case radioactive) elements Strontium and Barium in its structure could never have been built because the construction crew would have become seriously ill first.

“….The only explanation that is possible—and indeed the scientifically inescapable conclusion—is that a large-scale fission chain reaction took place in the locality, releasing Strontium, Barium and many other radionucleides into the environment as daughter products of Uranium fission….The presence of large quantities of other well-known daughter products in correlated quantities makes the case overwhelming, beyond any shadow of a doubt whatsoever that a nuclear explosion occurred.

“The complexity of the other relationships are also what we would expect from a high-energy nuclear explosion rather than the low-energy fission in a controlled reactor. Fission did not stop with two fission fragments—many of these were fissioned in turn into smaller atoms by the intense concentrated neutron radiation in and underneath the building[s].” 

The presence of high levels of vanadium, a radioactive decay product. An expert in aerosols and atmospheric sciences, Dr. Thomas Cahill of the University of California, also had studied the USGS report and pronounced the vanadium level the highest ever seen in the U.S. So were the high levels of nickel and chromium, both decay products.

During WTC cleanup. Beginning on October 3, vanadium levels increased day by day until October 26 when it was joined by a significant spike in chromium and nickel levels.

Shock and Blast Waves  fissionable energy is triggered into a chain-reaction. It is followed a nano-second later by a blast wave’s shock “front” of compressed air shutting out sound, and silently “blasting” everything in its path. As it strikes the ground, the super-heated wave roars along, flattening people and objects until its force is expended. It also can rupture and ignite gas and storage tanks. Traveling directly behind it, however, the blast wave extinguishes fires just as candlelight does when someone blows it out. Unfortunately, by then, the damage is done. If vehicles are parked close together—as they were in WTC garages and the neighborhood—one ruptured gas tank or gas leake on the ground can set off a chain-reaction of fires. That seems to have happened even to fire trucks and ambulances despite valiant efforts made by dozens of firefighting companies to extinguish them.

The Street-Level ‘Base-Surge’ Clouds

Another sign of an underground nuclear explosion is a “base-surge” cloud that also travels along the ground. The dust contained in it on 9/11 was too cool and heavy to rise to thousands of feet and accompany the lighter and hot (500º-1,500º F) “pyroclastic” main cloud. The heavy “ejecta” from the fuel eruption falls to Earth and, still full of energy, is transformed into a dirt-and-air-filled cloud. It billows rapidly outward. On 9/11, the base surge carried particles of concrete, steel, office combustibles, asbestos, human remains, ash—and the radioactive materials revealed by USGS spectrometers.

Electromagnetic Pulses (EMPs)

Another signature of a reactor “event” is an electromagnetic pulse (EMP). Basically, in a nuclear bomb explosion, a side-effect is created by radiation that is ionizing. The particles’ tremendous energy sets electrons spinning at such a strong rate that it “shorts out” anything operating off a circuit such as computers, power lines, appliances, telephones/cell phones—

even Pacemakers. EMPs are a major concern for the military’s sophisticated communication systems as much as they were for First Responders on 9/11. They depended heavily on Handy-Talkies, especially for evacuation orders that were never heard by firefighters who died on the Towers’ upper floors.

Initially, the Handy Talky manufacturer Motorola was singled out for blame, but when the New York fire department’s WTC task-force interviewers made a point of asking Responders about that product, their statements indicated that blame probably should fall on EMPs:

“I proceeded to give Maydays on every channel. I had the mobile radio so I had every channel. I heard absolutely nothing. It was completely dead. … the silence, the eeriness of having no mobile communication with anything made me feel a little uneasy.” 

“People were sharing cell phones to see if they could call. There were no signals. Nothing else like that.” 

“I had a Motorola radio. I couldn’t get through to anybody….I was on EMS Citywide and I don’t know if my radio was clogged or the batteries [were at fault]. It could have been a hundred different things.”

There is eyewitness testimony saying the power to WTC 2 went off a second or two before WTC 2 began to come apart. I believe this is true and that it was done to isolate the WTC Towers from the power grid. Otherwise, they may have knocked out the power grid over a very large (multi-state) area. We can remember when a power surge knocked out the power grid for New York City and much of the northeast. So, I can’t imagine that a total destruction of a WTC tower in 10 seconds would not cause a problem.” 

Extreme Heat in Ground Zero Cleanup

Another prime piece of evidence underpinning the nuclear theory is the extraordinary high temperatures (800-1,300º F) of the WTC’s surface heat after 9/11. It was recorded on September 16, 2001 by NASA’s thermal-sensitive cameras in aerial photographs shot at 6,500 feet. Those data were reflected in the unusually lengthy period—September 11 to December 19—it took for extinguishing the pools of molten metals in basement levels of all three skyscrapers. In fact, the hottest surface places recorded on the “Pile” by September 16 were WTC 1 (1,376º F), WTC 2 (1,1340º F), and WTC 7 (1160ºF).

If those temperatures did not indicate additional signs of a nuclear event, the below-surface readings assuredly did. Instead of heat subsiding within a week, as is generally the case for major fires, the astronomically elevated heat levels remained for three months. Cleanup vendor Bechtel Corporation—with 40 employees at the Pile—issued this comment about working conditions:

“The debris pile at Ground Zero was always tremendously hot. Thermal measurements taken by helicopter each day showed underground temperatures ranging from 400ºF to more than 2,800ºF. The surface was so hot that standing too long in one spot softened (and even melted) the soles of our safety shoes. Steel toes would often heat up and become intolerable. This heat was also a concern for the search-and-rescue dogs used at the site. Many were not outfitted with protective booties. More than one suffered serious injuries and at least three died while working at Ground Zero.” 

“… the rubble pile was so hot in places that it melted the soles of boots. Work shoes with steel reinforcements in the soles and toes protected feet against punctures by sharp objects, but often could not be worn because they conducted and retained the heat, causing blistered or scorched feet. One special-operations member said, “Steel toes never break in. We’d all be sitting there at night bandaging up and everybody had the same blisters. It was related to wearing the steel toe for that duration”.

In two of the chief reactor accidents in history, that 2800ºF temperature was never attained. Windscale was 2,372ºF; Three-Mile Island was 2,012ºF. True, Chernobyl registered 4,172º F, but 14 days later dropped to 598ºF. The same rapid decline was reported for the other two other reactor disasters.

At the WTC, thermal energy vaporized the rubble—concrete, steel, glass, combustibles—and emitted aerosols of chromium, nickel and other metals elements directly related to radioactivity. It was those “volcanic temperatures” and the constant simmering pools of molten metal that could not be hidden from the public. Neither could daily changes of soil, nor hosing down the embers. These are well-known remedies for extinguishing fission’s chain reactions until their energy is expended and decay begins.

Ttrucks bearing rubble to New York City’s Fresh Kills dump did notcarry “hot” residue. Like downtown streets, trucks were hosed down before leaving Ground Zero. The city’s WTC information website explained that the purpose was to reduce “dust” from construction materials, especially asbestos. Others believe the hosing was done chiefly to decontaminate radioactive rubble and soil loads. Some kind of chain reaction was ongoing at WTC “even after the energy field [was] removed.”

“The thermal energy available from the fuel on board each aircraft is minuscule in comparison with that required to melt the steel columns and raise the temperature of the rubble to the temperatures of 1000K [1,832ºF] recorded by the AVIRIS infra-red system at the surface, let alone the underground temperatures that were vapourising glass.

‘Cerenkov Radiation’

A highly visible signature of neutron fission is “Cerenkov Radiation” or “Cherenkov Light,” When escaping radiation particles—gamma rays—meet the atmosphere, they send up an eerie light-blue light ray nearly to outer space. The color stems from gamma particles moving more rapidly than the speed of light.

At Chernobyl, the chief mechanical engineer for Reactor No. 4 recalls the hypnotic power of Cerenkov Radiation. Minutes after the steam blew off the 2,000-ton concrete cover from the reactor, he stood for a few seconds in the road watching the death-dealing gamma rays rising from it:

“…I could see a huge beam of projected light flooding up to infinity from the reactor. It was like a laser light, caused by the [radiation] ionisation of the air. It was light-bluish and it was very beautiful. I watched it for several seconds. If I’d stood there for just a few minutes, I would probably have died on the spot because of gamma rays and neutrons and everything else that was spewing out.”

The blue glow at that Soviet complex remained for two weeks until core fissioning ended and decay of nuclear remains began.

If the exposed core in the Chernobyl accident could emit it, so could the Towers. When much of the debris field was cleared away by mid-March, a light concrete cover was poured over the WTC 1 and 2 sites. The city then placed two banks of 44 light blue spotlights atop them as a “Tribute in Light” memorial to the Towers. Lights were switched on at dusk until 11 p.m. from March 11 to April 13, 2002. This would only be temporary,  the lights were extinguished almost a month later and trucked off to a Las Vegas warehouse.

 In order to cover up the blue light that would otherwise attract attention two light projectors were set up with the cover story of being a “Light Memorial”. They were used to shine up into the sky in the same place as the Cerenkov Radiation being emitted  by ground zero. This was done in order mask it or at least provide a cover story to explain it.

Perhaps it was an unrelated factor, but when Silverstein rebuilt WTC 7, one of its features was a seven-story, permanent “podium light wall” at its base. The wall has a seven-story ray of light that follows pedestrians walking past two sides of the building. Its color? Light-blue.

Radiation-Related Cancer Increasing

Those base-surge clouds were deadly because the toxic dust penetrated bodies. So were the pyroclastic clouds that were not spirited away by Hurricanes Erin and Gabrielle their radioactive residue had to have settled for miles beyond the Greater New York area. What certainly is known is that millions have become affected physically  either on 9/11 or in its aftermath—firefighters, rescue/recovery workers, residents, commuters—according to New York City’s health commissioner. Respiratory and lung ailments from Ground-Zero cleanup have received the most medical and media attention because of sheer numbers (22,416 in 2003 alone). Add to those figures the class-action suit of 8,500 recovery workers against New York City and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for lying about clean-air quality post-9/11 perhaps to protect the area’s economy. Like the 2,400 Pennsylvania families suing state and federal agencies concerning the Three Mile Island tragedy, they, too, face official denials about radiation deaths and ailments.

Some 400 of the WTC litigants have developed cancer, considered highly significant by oncologists because of their relatively young ages and general good health prior to 9/11. Thirty-three died of cancer by 2006. Most foreboding of all, 75 of them have developed blood-cell cancers that could only be linked to radiation: non-Hodgkins lymphoma, multiple myeloma, thyroid cancer and myelogenous leukemia. Today, the unexpected, rapid growth of cases strongly indicates to health professionals that cancer may be the “third wave” of WTC-linked ailments and soon outnumber pulmonary deaths. Physicians increasingly are making comparisons to Hiroshima/Nagasaki blood cancers from the 1945 atom bomb attack and that same connection to victims of Three Mile Island and Chernobyl.

—–

Bonus document to be used by those who investigate Dimonia and childish “nuclear ambiguity.”

A useful rule of thumb for gauging the proliferation of any given reactor is that 1 Megawatt-day (thermal energy release, not electricity output) of operation produces 1 gram of Plutonium in any reactor using 20% or lower Enriched Uranium.
map
The number of nuclear weapons Israel produced depends on how much Plutonium has been produced at Dimona. The credibility of Vanunu‘s statement is essential in trying to assess Israel‘s nuclear capability.
According to Mordechai Vanunu the Nuclear Reactor at Dimona was scaled up twice, the first was from 26 MW(t) to 70 MW(t), and the second just before he arrived at the facility was from 70 MW(t) to some higher level which produced 40 kg of Plutonium every year. This study assumes that the Dimona Reactor was operated at 150 MW(t) by 1977, which would result in producing 40 kg of Plutonium per year.
From this the maximum and minimum yearly output of weapons-grade Plutonium fuel can be estimated, and the number of Plutonium based nuclear weapons that can be produced. (see Appendix).  
This is shown in the next chart in three stages:
> First being that Dimona operated at a capacity of 26 MWt from 1963 until end of 1969, then from 1970 up to 1976 it operated at the upgraded capacity of 70 MWt.
>Total Plutonium produced if the reactor was operating 60% of the time is 147 kg.
> Total Plutonium produced if the reactor was operating 90% of the time is 224 kg.
Second: Dimona continues to operate at Capacity of 70 Mega Waat from 1976 until 2008 i.e. no upgrade up to 150 MWt.
Total Plutonium produced if the reactor was operating 60% of the time is 627 kg.
Total Plutonium produced if the reactor was operating 90% of the time is 960 kg.
 Third : Dimona operates at Capacity of 150 MWt from 1976 until 2008, according to Mordecai Vanunu.
– Total Plutonium produced if the reactor was operating 60% of the time is 1203 kg.
– Total Plutonium produced if the reactor was operating 90% of the time is 1791 kg.

The Plutonium Breeder

Related Posts:



The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT, VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians, or the Veterans Today Network and its assigns. LEGAL NOTICE - COMMENT POLICY

Posted by on June 2, 2014, With 34985 Reads Filed under WarZone. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

FaceBook Comments

60 Responses to "VT Nuclear Education: Undeniable Proof of 9/11 as a Nuclear Event"

  1. Bonusje  June 18, 2014 at 11:51 am

    https //twitter.com/Bonusje/status/479334451143782400

  2. Bonusje  June 17, 2014 at 9:32 pm

    http //rt.com/news/160696-aegis-ashore-test-launch/

    3/4
    All banking to plunder&prey on Nations comes from them and are very big piramidescams for what they have to throw Nations in wars every about 50 years to prevent detection and alarm. All West is by long overdue for anihilation when a in Russia stolen warhead did Not wantto detonate above Washington in a C130 in year 2000.
    4/4
    Since then israel and the li media are hateseeding between every Nuclear Nation besides doing WTC as divertion from that faillure and theire mega plunders in West and massmurder Palestines to again try to start a nuclear war French almost fell for and setting fire to Russian forests by mossad and had polish and Russian
    5/4
    media blame us (also by fake id´s) where they set fire to own forests to cover for their crimes when that came out they were behind the Russian Forest fires.

    They dragged all Value &countless trillions away and raped prostituted and drugged All Children So have something to cover up…also why china azerbeidjan turkeye and israel Realy are SO booming from and central banksters&nobils rich beyond Imagination!

  3. Bonusje  June 17, 2014 at 9:28 pm

    “” as having cancers any idiot knows are radiation sickness.””

    Neh…in case of radiation there would be fallout any detector should have picked up many metals would be secundairy radiationsourches now like aluminium. Nothing of such and No earthquacke nuke signature is found.

    Just first went by weakening stealstructure by fire and the others the demolitionway

  4. Snoopy  June 10, 2014 at 11:38 pm

    “Nuclear attacks are being planned today. We will see them in the United States.”
    Gordon Duff

    I agree 100% and wish to add emphasis by including heretofore neglected testimonials (and physical evidence in the way of rescurer illnesses) which point to A PREVIOUS MICRO-NUKE ACT OF FALSE-FLAG TERRORISM CONDUCTED AGAINST THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES which was also BLAMED UPON AN IDEOLOGICAL ENEMY to the EVIL CABAL. Namely the Murrah Federal Building bombing of 1995, aka OKC BOMBING. Why such a logical connection is avoided, or at the very least routinely missed, by such capable and knowledgeable investigative researchers escapes explanation.

    Ordinance team member to doctor upon return from OKC
    “…this guy started really having a bit of panic attack right in my examination room at the St. Francis hospital in Colorado Springs…. I said, “Look, I’m not going to do anything for you until you come clean because I have to know what you were exposed to, if it was chemicals or dust or whatever.” He said it wasn’t any of those. It was radiation. I said, “Come on.” He said, “We got exposed to radiation.” And he said, “Look at this.” And he showed me this weird rash….”We removed two baseball-size micro-nuclear weapons that were on the pillars of the building and a very large C4 pineapple that could have vaporized the building…”
    whale.to/b/deagle1 html

    • Snoopy  June 10, 2014 at 11:46 pm

      and here

      “But I’d rather focus in on the fact that,
      howsoever the bombing occurred in Oklahoma — *bombings*, in the
      plural — that the people that were on a mission of mercy are
      suffering extreme health problems. And I believe, from the
      details, they’re dying from radioactive poisoning, exposure…
      I intend to lead a campaign to help these people that tried
      to rescue other people in Oklahoma and are now, apparently, dying
      from radiation exposure. And the government is prepared to deny
      it for some years to come. And as the time passes, these people
      (I hate to predict, but), these people, by the time the
      government gets around to telling the truth, will be dead.”
      SHERMAN SKOLNICK, investigative reporter (RIP)

      https //groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.conspiracy/cN4qtOAhCoA

      “..Rumors quickly spread that the dogs had died of radiation poisoning.”

      http //solargeneral.com/library/oklahoma-city-bombing-and-the-politics-of-terror-david-hoffman pdf

  5. Cold Wind  June 4, 2014 at 6:37 pm

    I understand the Israelis are ‘expert’ at reconfiguring, miniaturizing and concealing nuclear weapons. Duff certainly provides a plausible argument for the use of some type of modified nuclear weapon in bringing down the Twin Towers, but it is still a theory that requires confirmation. Obviously, someone, a denizen of the CIA or the Pentagon, for example, knows exactly how (and more importantly who) did 9-11. Maybe they will in good conscience come forward– now that, in the 13 year aftermath of 9-11,we are flirting with full scale nuclear war with Russia.

  6. wiggins  June 4, 2014 at 1:24 pm

    A Man called Da-Da…………try Thermic Lance for conveyancing purposes………..no charge.

  7. bmcks  June 4, 2014 at 11:49 am

    Good points; gerryhiles. I too have a problem with no thermite, or whatever it’s called. I believe the ‘illuminati’ didn’t take chances, especially when Zionists like Wolfowitz & Perle recommended ‘New World Order’ in publically funded places like ‘New American Century’ forums. “A new Pearl Harbor” says it all. Money was no object; especially in a money losing enterprise like WTC. Yes, it made a great impact on the world, but the “powers that be” failed. Gordon Duff’s report says more than the WTC collapse. We decent workers & veterans will win. Ending on a pleasant note, Larry Silverstein’s ‘Freedom Tower’ is not renting well, like David Rockefeller’s WTC. What goes around comes around. Yeah, I’m a snob. Terrible part of Manhattan! But neither-3rd generation overbred WASP’s or porn millionaires, understand it’s “location”.

  8. gerryhiles  June 4, 2014 at 12:10 am

    Good stuff Gordon. It all fits, but please do not rule-out at least thermate for cutting beams and columns into neat sections,

    Given what is observable, there were ‘squibs’ going off all down WTCs 1 & 2.

    My impression is that 911 is not accounted for by any singular factor, neither in terms of the means to create a “New Pearl Harbour”, nor the financial motivations to profit from the MIC, with the Rothschilds Dynasty orchestrating global events since about 1790, when Nathan said that he could an would control everything by money supply

  9. Don Fox  June 3, 2014 at 8:02 pm

    Zinc is one of the most overlooked elements in the USGS dust samples.

    5 isotopes of Zinc are stable and the other 6 are highly radioactive with very short half lives. Since this much Zinc was found by the USGS a week after 9/11 it was most likely not radioactive.

    The Zinc concentration for WTC01-02, Water Street at the intersection of New York, is 2,990 ppm and this immediately stands out. In fact, for the outdoor samples, Zinc is the most common Trace element at all sampling locations, with generally between 1,000 ppm and 2,000 ppm except for this spike of nearly 3000 ppm at WTC01-02. What process produced all of the Zinc?

    Ternary fission is responsible for a great deal of the Zinc. This indicates that very high energy levels were involved. Typically uranium will fission into two fragments. Ternary fission means that three fission fragments are produced (Z ~ 30).

    There is little doubt that the fission stage of these bombs was boosted with tritium. These were advanced nuclear devices to be sure. Enhanced radiation weapons or more commonly known as neutron bombs.

    Gordon’s excellent piece here confirms the work that Jeff Prager, Ed Ward and myself have done on the nuclear demolition of the WTC buildings.

    • JS  June 3, 2014 at 8:30 pm

      Neutron bombs were always billed as bombs that would kill people but leave buildings standing. Now we know that’s not true.

    • Don Fox  June 4, 2014 at 2:08 am

      The original intent of the neutron bomb was detonate a 1 kt device a mile up over a battlefield area. In that scenario most structures on the ground would be spared but the burst of radiation would kill most of the soldiers.

      A neutron bomb is a modified hydrogen bomb. It’s modified to reduce heat and blast affects and increase radiation – particularly neutron radiation. The heat and blast affects are not eliminated though. At point blank range a neutron bomb is going to do a lot of damage.

  10. Worker Bee  June 3, 2014 at 6:34 pm

    “The color stems from gamma particles moving more rapidly than the speed of light.”

    Uh, think this has a typo and should be “beta particles”.

  11. Jack Heart  June 3, 2014 at 1:42 pm

    “‘Cerenkov Radiation’”
    Wow, I remember for days afterward looking west down the Fire Island beach about 20 miles from ground zero. You could see a translucent column that seemed to stretch right up to the cloud cover, it was particularly noticeable at dusk and on overcast days, I remember looking at it days afterward and wondering why if the debris were still smoldering the wind wasn’t effecting the smoke which was rising straight up. I can’t be the only one who seen it.

  12. Preston James, Ph.D  June 3, 2014 at 1:19 pm

    This series on the use of nukes stolen by the Bush Crime cabal and given to their associates the IZCS to use to institute the 9/11 demo of the twin towers which murdered several thousand at the time and many thousands later from slow-kill, has disclosed smoking gun evidence. It can no longer be denied that the attack on the twin towers was a nuclear false-flag attack done by the World Zionists and their Cutouts, Sayanims, Mossad, NeoCons, PNACers, and Traitors in the JCS, USAF and NORAD.

    This series by VT Senior Editor Gordon Duff is of monumental importance and is a major turning point in the battle to get the truth about 9/11 out to the masses. Highest commendations are due for this fine series of groundbreaking articles. Soon this will be driven into the mainstream media (the Controlled Major Mass Media). With the coming end to secrecy you will see numerous NSA raw data stolen by Israel that has been copied by another major Intel entity, being released bit by bit on the Internet which petrifies the BCC and the WZs/IZCS.

    Certainly the rumors that if the US did not stop sending CIA mercenaries and terrorists to the Ukraine and Syria, Russian President Putin would release his massive Intel proof to the whole world that 9/11 was a false-flag inside job no longer seem so incredulous.

  13. joe chuy-medina  June 3, 2014 at 12:11 pm

    Excellent info. I never realized that a nuclear cloud could turn tens of thousands of steel girders and half a million 2” bolts to nano-dust. I assume that the comments about the planes, and the fuel they added to the plot, were made by someone other than Gordon. In many discussions, regardless of how scientific and logical the claims, I am immediately suspicious when the authors have failed to produce any evidence that planes struck and penetrated an impenetrable structure. Contrary to popular opinions, eyewitnesses did not “see” the planes actually enter either tower, but were told that repeatedly by the media and the government, and assumed that it was totally accurate. Many of the statements say as much. The issue of planes striking the towers and the Pentagon has been dismantled many times over the years.
    As with the article, “Dancing Israelis,” which has believable points, I feel that the one definitive statement about the events of that day is still no addressed – that there could have been no planes, no hijackings, no terrorists –for more than 100 reasons, beginning with the testimony from NORAD that they had control of the skies that morning.

  14. bmcks  June 3, 2014 at 11:52 am

    Excellent article Mr. Duff. I have a strange affiliation with WTC having worked & lived in Manhattan when they went up. They are the brain child of David Rockefeller, when midtown was blossoming and downtown dying. Every reputable architectural critic panned them, and many vicious fights in the press between DR & respected Japanese architect Yamansaki. He considered them “megalomania” in size, at DR’s insistence. I also had clients in WTC, and know what fine security they had. Following the money, they also never made a dime, eventually financed by NY State taxpayers. Sound familiar? They never really held a prestige hoped for, until their evaporation. But it gave the bogus excuse to invade mineral rich countries since. They too have failed, like DR’s 3rd generation brats dream. That, to me, is just as important. Would DR approve nuclear destruction of his colossal mistakes? NO! But neither is the Pope Catholic…

  15. JS  June 3, 2014 at 10:07 am

    Small point The article has a list of 6 Richter-scale events, but it looks like 7 events because it’s on 7 lines. This should be one line, one event
    ” 9 59 04 am 9 59 am WTC 2 destroyed
    [WTC 7 explosion?] 2.1 ”

    Also, what about WTC 6? Article discusses the nuclear heat under WTC 1, 2, and 7, and the big round holes in WTC 4, 5, and the damage to WTC 3 (Marriott Hotel) from falling debris. But no discussion of 6.

    • JS  June 3, 2014 at 10:28 am

      The list of Richter-scale events above, has WTC 1 rated as 2.3, and WTC 2 rated as 2.1, but Dmitri Khalezov here in VT last fall, said that both events were more than 5.5 on the Richter scale.
      http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/09/02/thoughts-on-mini-nukes-theory-in-regard-to-nuclear-demolition-of-the-world-trade-center/
      Quote from Khalezov, “Later, in the Chapter devoted to the actual nuclear demolition of the Twin Towers, it will be proven that the people from Columbia University cheated us, again, and the real seismic events before the Towers began to collapse were well over 5.5 on the Richter Scale; but for now the abovementioned is sufficient.”

    • JS  June 3, 2014 at 11:12 am

      WTC 7 was the big mystery for awhile. Video shows that it came down in a stately manner, like a classic controlled demolition. Yet WTC 7 had that underground intense heat for months. Fetzer and Cimino quote Anonymous Physicist about this, in an article a couple months ago.
      http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/02/14/911-a-world-swirling-in-a-volcano-of-lies/
      Anonymous Physicist “believes that WTC-7 did not have a nuclear device used during “collapse” but could have had one just afterwards to vaporize evidence”. He also suggested that a mix of devices had been used on 9/11 in NYC. “Some of the most interesting and important research on the mode of destruction of the World Trade Center (WTC) on 9/11 has come from “the Anonymous Physicist”, who has endorsed the use of mini or micro nukes but has also suggested that a mix of devices was employed.”

  16. Raptor  June 3, 2014 at 8:52 am

    How was Mr R ” Willie ” able to survive such a thing? Either something is off with his story, or he was long long gone when the thing was detonated.

    Trying to expose the use of nukes is a very important aspect of getting to the real truth….again, the size of those structures is lost on most everyone, let alone those with their heads in the sand. To achieve a top down deconstruct ( like what was seen on video ) may actually be something different all together. Maybe that’s what they wanted people to see on the video making it a bit easier to justify planes and fire from jet fuel…….I have always contended that this is where the Gages of the truth movement really came from. Just my opinion but if they were even remotely close then they would have been silenced years ago.

    Someone here said something about changing the term ” ground zero ” in a dictionary…..Funny how some can see that yet fail to notice the lack of anything pre 9-11 that deals with those towers and how they were actually built. Most everything has been removed from the public domain….

    The weather thing is interesting only Erin was there the whole time…..clear blue sky that day.

    Raptor

  17. etominusipi  June 3, 2014 at 5:34 am

    great series, Gordon.

    what is your view of Susan Lindauer? on this video
    https //www.youtube.com/watch?v=yP5QGJvhQg0
    she says (25’41-3″) she was told (by Mueller?) shortly before 911 –
    “we are expecting the use of a miniature thermonuclear device”

    • JS  June 3, 2014 at 4:27 pm

      No, she was told that by her CIA handler, Richard Fuisz. She says several times that everything she knew came from him. As for Mueller, his name comes up because on Aug. 2, when Mueller was in the process of being nominated as FBI Director, Lindauer told Fuisz that Mueller threw both the OKC bombing and Lockerbie investigations, and would throw others if he were confirmed.

    • etominusipi  June 4, 2014 at 5:18 pm

      thx 4 that clarification.

  18. jmreeves  June 3, 2014 at 1:30 am

    Was that a Cerenkov joke?
    I saw a pic on Fukushima in the early days,
    a pic had a blue (very pretty light blue) light
    straight up.
    I am scared.

    John

    • jmreeves  June 3, 2014 at 1:39 am

      If you want the signature for your bestiary,
      find a picture of a Cobalt 60 Irridator source
      while submerged in the pool (of water).
      Scary stuff, kills basically everything,
      Gamma Rays (great for bandages and such.. kill you in a heartbeat.
      Pretty Blue.

      John

  19. Justin Kennedy  June 2, 2014 at 9:11 pm

    With an underground nuclear explosion of sufficient yield, there shouldn’t be any need for “nano-thermite” or any other secondary devices. But there is little question there were a series of explosions in all 3 WTC towers prior to their collapse. Demolishing office towers using underground explosions was an unproven technology, so these earlier mini-nuke or conventional explosions were probably used to take-out key support columns in the sub-basements, ensuring the towers collapsed in their own footprint.

    The December 2001 edition of “The New Scientist” magazine reported that the WTC underground fires were the “longest burning structural fires in history”. On Sept. 27/01, city officials ordered 2000 gallons of “Pyrocool FEF” which contains two powerful ultra-violet absorbers, to be mixed in the water being sprayed on the underground hotspots. They sprayed Pyrocool on the WTC rubble for over 6 months trying to cool them down (then waited 10 years to rebuild on the site).

    Not your typical underground fires. Not your typical building demolitions. You only have to watch the “spires” (remnants of exterior steel columns) disintegrate into thin air to realize there were some unconventional energy sources being used that day…along with the volcanic-like eruptions of WTC 1 & 2, turning the towers into pyroclastic clouds of dust…visually similar to the Plowshare underground nuclear experiments.

    • stephanaugust  June 2, 2014 at 11:54 pm

      “… these earlier mini-nuke or conventional explosions were probably used to take-out key support columns in the sub-basements, …”

      These are called nuclear borers.

  20. mcfadden  June 2, 2014 at 8:50 pm

    I can’t tell for sure. I can tell you for sure that those smart meters, the digital broadcast signals, wifi, cell phone transmissions, and ionospheric agitations, are not without effect. My intuition, still effective despite a technical degree, tells me they are effecting heart attacks, strokes, , various degrees of muscular and mental debilities, and enhancing mycoplasma infection with these. But, gee, maybe I’m toooo paranoid.
    Please, bust them on Bach. Maybe they’ll stop.
    And thank you, again.

  21. mcfadden  June 2, 2014 at 8:49 pm

    What about the electrical radiation they poison us with?
    They are debilitating people daily with their emf’s coupled to the mycoplasmas they put in their chemtrails. I only narrowly escaped dementia with the help of a product called Protandim, and some other aids ( coconut oil, lots of turmeric, magnesium chloride, dmso ) . The advance of the progression was such that in 2012 I had to promise myself an exit ( .45) before I suffered the ignominy of not even knowing my name. The reason I am telling this, Gordon, is because I believe you are knowledgeable about this, also, owing to a comment you had made about “Bach”. About “busting them on Bach”, more specifically.
    Now, before other readers infer that the first sentence here is simply evidence of my malady, I would like to point them in the direction of Dr. Leonard Horowitz and a paper on mycoplasma by a man named Don Scott at educateyourself.org. What you don’t know will make you cry.
    Today in this central California city I am assailed by an electronic “humming” that I know from experience obstructs the function of the hypothalamus. Goodbye proprioception. I notice this quite often when ( I believe) they are working on a weather change. Forecasts yesterday called for + 100 degrees later in the week. I think they might be trying to break that today. Or, it might just be that it’s their regularly scheduled mind phuk program day. I can’t tell for sure.

    • jmreeves  June 2, 2014 at 9:18 pm

      did I mention life is an experiment (in fact I did)
      We have a serious cell tower not far away (mostly pointed elsewhere)
      and I sit among various apparat(us) which we really do not know will not hurt me.
      EM susceptibility and emissivity are close cousins, and these are pretty quiet it seems.
      Distance counts, I sit among (but not THAT close (a foot or more) to them.
      I (nor anyone else) knows what if anything might happen.
      I think it is bad enough if I ‘put it there’.
      It gets worse if from others (the cell tower) no practical recourse there,
      and as to the stuff I sit next to, well, at least I put it there.
      If they start trying to paste RF sources on my house, another matter.

      John

    • jmreeves  June 2, 2014 at 9:47 pm

      As to what it would take to determine what is impinging on this location at a given time?
      A lot of (wideband stuff and time for that matter) which I do not have on hand.

      Insidious.

      John

    • jmreeves  June 3, 2014 at 12:12 am

      The visual cortex is the Mother of all Real Time engines,
      the auditory cortex ain’t too shabby either.
      Never mind all the talk of whatever, ‘we’ have NOTHING
      which Remotely approximates what these do (and they replicate.. Kids.. remember)
      and they (the critters with the cortexes) convey to their young (sometimes)
      what they have learned, or at least observed.
      The Pineal gland is worthy of study,
      it actually is a ‘third eye’, it is associated with the visual cortex.
      Dreams come in many kinds, the frustrating days business over and over,
      and then there is ‘going visiting’, in between how do our brains make those cartoons?
      Anyway.. Visual Cortex, Pineal Gland, Third Eye.
      (and dreams)

      John

  22. jmreeves  June 2, 2014 at 8:21 pm

    The matter of the Quest for the Nuclear Fire.
    I foolishly though that people who play with that kind of stuff
    know better than to tempt fate.
    I Was Wrong.
    There is no reset, no rewind, it is like a bad car (train?) wreck..
    You are counting your parts (but not all connected)
    A caricature for good reason,
    The Whole Nuclear thing is due for reexamination.
    Good Luck to us considering the powers that cling.
    And I for one am not counting on them to see light of day (one man’s guess)
    In any case, the mess is glaring at us,
    as is cartel control over critical resources.

    John

    • jmreeves  June 2, 2014 at 8:55 pm

      Leaving aside groups affiliations and such,
      There are a couple (2) things which might get us extinct. (of which I am aware at this time)
      One is nuclear, the other biological.
      They have in common that they ‘keep on giving’ (replicate or somehow get worse
      and that they alter our (and other lifeforms) germplasm (if my terminology lacks please help)
      it is the stuff (DNA/RNA and whatever else like that) that is the blueprints for life as we know it.
      Any alterations to this are likely persistent.
      And so we need to shut these guys down cold in all such cases.
      It does not matter whether they anticipated or intended the complications,
      The germplasm at large is the major accomplishment of this planet as an experiment,
      it would be a real shame if it got clobbered (even by mistake)!
      (we can always screw it up later, what’s the rush?

      John

  23. jmreeves  June 2, 2014 at 7:42 pm

    This is sort of before my time, but
    Robert Strange McNamara.
    What’s in a name (and who would name their kid that.. Ima and youra pig?
    Queue Doctor Strangelove? (and No, Bob was NOT the ‘doctor’)

    John

  24. KevinGJHG  June 2, 2014 at 5:32 pm

    Great work Gordon! Hopefully one of these days the whole truth will come out!

  25. Excalibur  June 2, 2014 at 3:41 pm

    Brilliant work Gordon. It is so important to get this article – and others like it in the series – published on the VT site for all inquiring minds to absorb. Whilst the controlled western media will never cover this of course – there are signs that the very same western mass media has never been so discredited and so disbelieved by the public. Ukraine. Syria, Libya – and all the recent instances of their clear disinformation and obvious lies – are catching up with them. The massive lying is having an effect – particularly with ordinary honest people when they see the wonderful ‘liberal progressive democracies’ caught murdering children with nerve gas for effect – and lying to protect oligarch mass murderers in places like Ukraine. Keep publishing the obvious – the people are hungry for the truth – if only because they realise that their lives are being systematically dismantled.

  26. jmreeves  June 2, 2014 at 3:18 pm

    Thank You.

    John

  27. stephanaugust  June 2, 2014 at 2:35 pm

    “If vehicles are parked close together—as they were in WTC garages and the neighborhood—one ruptured gas tank or gas leake on the ground can set off a chain-reaction of fires.”

    1. Was this also shown in some of the old nuclear demonstration films where they showed trees, houses, and cars in the blast?

    2. What happens with thin metal compared to thick metal? Is thin metal not harmed? I never saw a toasted street sign.

    • DaveE  June 2, 2014 at 5:18 pm

      Street signs are aluminum, cars steel. No reason to think they would behave the same way. Microwave ovens boil water but leave most other liquids lukewarm at best.

    • stephanaugust  June 2, 2014 at 6:03 pm

      But then there are no toasted or deformed traffic light steel posts. And also the massive steel structure at the FDR drive is neither toasted nor deformed. The FDR drive displayed only toasted cars. (Toasted red herrings, maybe?)

  28. mpennery  June 2, 2014 at 1:58 pm

    The more I learn about how 9/11 went down, the more in awe I am of whoever planned and executed this job. I don’t mean to sound insincere but, wow, to know almost exactly how all these millions of tons of concrete and steel would respond, to know to cut the power just before, to plan to move hurricanes for Christ’s sake, to create fake videos, control the press, and on and on and on. Jesus, there can’t be too many people on this planet that would have the know-how about the nuclear weapons much less to bring everything else together so incredibly well. WHO can do this? It’s got to be a short list.
    Thanks Mr. Duff. Amazing work.

    • Excalibur  June 2, 2014 at 3:44 pm

      Damn cunning those Afghan cavemen mpennery …..

    • wolf  June 2, 2014 at 3:52 pm

      It must make you very proud eh? Proud that your team was able to pull this off and fool so many for so long. To think. These 19 camel jocks commanded via cell phone by a half-dead former CIA asset in a cave in Afghanistan, hijacked airliners with boxcutters and flew them with remarkable precision into the towers and the Pentagon. Arabs who couldn’t fly planes but could execute sensational aerial maneuvers that experienced pilots insist were impossible. But that’s believable to you? hahaha right

    • jmreeves  June 2, 2014 at 4:24 pm

      I do not think it ‘ends here’.
      Call it what you will, Karma, Reincarnation, whatever.
      I have no idea how a lot of stuff works, and I do not think there is a script.
      I have reason to believe that the unseen world is real,
      that we are in fact spirits in a material world,
      and some say even the rocks contain spirits (another thread for another time).
      I would not want to be ‘these guys’!
      I have no idea whether we will have a viable planet left,
      but there is no way their ‘plan’ could end in anything but tears.
      Snatching defeat from the jaws of victory?

      John

    • jmreeves  June 2, 2014 at 5:15 pm

      I will venture this
      Some people seem to have a morbid fascination with trying to tell the future.
      In some cases this has resulted (so I hear) in efforts to model (in computer simulations) humanity,
      In others it has manifest as efforts to ‘hotwire’ the ‘system’.
      The ‘system’ (it hatched this whole thing we live in, but not all its stupid pet tricks)
      got up earlier, and runs faster jumps higher and works on truth (saves a lot of overhead).
      Life is an experiment, how does it feel to be a lab rat?

      John

    • wolf  June 2, 2014 at 6:05 pm

      With furled brow and earnest countenance, monochrome in his dark suit and skinny tie…with cigarette smoke swirling about his presence. And then he speaks

      Submitted for your approval. You’re traveling to another dimension, a dimension not only of sight and sound, but also of mind; a journey into a wondrous land whose boundaries are that of the imagination. At the sign post up ahead, your next stop…the twilight zone.

      Could this guy be the Robbie Parker of Santa Barbara? Check it out.
      ***https //www.youtube.com/watch?v=vAoKDjDKap0

    • jmreeves  June 2, 2014 at 6:50 pm

      We are so up to our knecks in poster children,
      and today has been a real humdinger, a King abdicated,
      there were a couple of elections, the Euphrates requires a pump (??)
      annexation of ‘area C’ is being considered, and that’s not all.
      What a (expensive) Circus.
      The whole thing about ‘crisis actors’ and being ‘allowed’ to propagandize the population
      (at their expense in more ways than just one)
      I will have a look.
      Thanks.

      John

    • mpennery  June 3, 2014 at 6:18 am

      Glitschige, that is hands down the dumbest comment I’ve ever seen from you. Do you not get embarrassed coming on here and showing yourself as an utter fool? I’m breaking my rule by responding to the monkey but, lord mercy, I even cringe at your pitiful attempts. I feel bad for you. Maybe you’re just trying to feed your family but no amount of money could convince me to act like you do. Do you honestly think ANYONE around here doesn’t know exactly what you are? Wow, pathetic.

  29. dirtus napus  June 2, 2014 at 12:17 pm

    “That seems to have happened even to fire trucks and ambulances despite valiant efforts made by dozens of firefighting companies to extinguish them.”

    Ever notice the street view pictures of the parked cars that burned only in certain areas of the engine area beyond the firewalls? Too many burned exactly like the others for that to be accidental. Paper didn’t burn in those areas in the exact moment the cars erupted. Smaller EMP burning up and overloading the chips in the engine area perhaps? Yeah, pretty sure…

  30. DaveE  June 2, 2014 at 12:16 pm

    One of the reasons no-one with the IQ of asbestos buys the “intense heat melted the collumns” story is that actual FLAMES are nowhere to be seen.

    I suspect nanothermite may have been used to attempt to create flames, before the nukes went off. Of course, this operation had a LOT of screw-ups and it’s obvious the planners couldn’t have survived a sophomore level engineering class if they were held at gunpoint. Flames need several things, like OXYGEN for example, that just weren’t around. But still, since these goobers constantly tell everyone how smart they are, I think they may have at least made a crude (and unsuccessful) attempt to be “clever” you-know-whos.

  31. Charlotte NC Bill  June 2, 2014 at 11:38 am

    Good job Uncle Gordy.

  32. ptwang  June 2, 2014 at 9:10 am

    nuclear seems to address a lot of issues that others don’t but I have a couple of questions..

    why did we see what looked to be thermite pouring out just before the collapse along with multiple small explosions as it was coming down?

    also how could it be possible that the collapse started right where the planes entered at 2 different heights?

    there’s also all the work being carried out in the upper sections of the buildings in the lead up.

    could it be that both thermite and nuclear were used to ensure the collapse started at the right point?

    • Gordon Duff  June 2, 2014 at 9:20 am

      we never saw what looked to be “thermite”…we saw vaporized steel and concrete dust…the thermite existed between the ears of a few disinfo types and those stupid enough to keep buying into them after they were debunked many years ago

    • ptwang  June 2, 2014 at 9:56 am

      I don’t know if it was disinfo, I think nuclear seemed pretty far fetched to most until Dimitri explained how it would work underground.

      I’m still stuck on the point of collapse though, I think they would have had to weaken that section for it to start at the ‘impact’ point at different heights on both buildings.

    • Gordon Duff  June 2, 2014 at 10:02 am

      we have, in these articles, presented evidence of cut columns and charges placed also.

      what there is no evidence of is a single granule or molecule of “nanothermite” ever having existed on planet earth, certainly not 143,000 tons of it. nobody made it, bought it, shipped it, financed it, worked in the factories, cleaned the machines…all total bullshit.
      hell, we have people in every weapons lab around the world, we get everything but no one has ever seen “super thermite” nor can anyone explain how it is made, who made it or anything remotely close.
      where i had looked on this is a piss poor Zionist disinfo job before, i am now finding the desperation and childish insanity of the ‘thermite sniffers’ to expose them as reprehensible and stupid beyond comprehension.
      i do not abide fools, even those paid by our Zionist masters.

    • disobey4sure  June 7, 2014 at 4:53 am

      Gordon– in future Education articles, I hope you will give some quotes from Dimitri’s New and Complete Book where he specifically explains, in layman language, all the types of nuclear explosions and them focuses on what happened on 9/11. The above information, provided by Home Land Security, available since 2009(5 years ago),
      addresses possible nuclear terrorism, but doesn’t show us how the Towers were destroyed–Dimitri does. Dimitri was in a special Russian Military Nuclear unit and said it was “common knowledge” in
      his unit in the early 1980s, and that the Russian leaders also knew about it, that there was already a plan in effect to demolish the Towers using Underground Nukes. If those who have commented still have all the questions they are bringing up, all they need to do is to read Dimitri’s book.
      Are you and Fetzer having some disagreement now? I know Jim still believes it was a Top/Down job– pretty silly.

  33. hertzian29  June 2, 2014 at 9:08 am

    This and the firefighter eyewitness account of “explosions” below the towers kinda rule out the energy weapons hypothesis I think. The pillars of Solomon(so important to our Freemason friends and very Kabbalistic) came down in a mass death ritual, erected on top is a new brotherhood obelisk called the “Freedom Tower”. It’s been 1984 for a long time.

  34. CoJonesGrandes  June 2, 2014 at 8:22 am

    Bravo bravo!
    It takes great courage to put this info out.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login


TOP 50 READ ARTICLES THIS MONTH
From Veterans Today Network