White House ‘leak’: Ukraine did it

White House ‘leak’: Ukraine did it

Pieces of wreckage of the Malaysia Airlines flight MH17 are pictured on July 18, 2014 in Shaktarsk, the day after it crashed. Flight MH17 from Amsterdam to Kuala Lumpur.

Pieces of wreckage of the Malaysia Airlines flight MH17 are pictured on July 18, 2014 in Shaktarsk, the day after it crashed. Flight MH17 from Amsterdam to Kuala Lumpur.

By Gordon Duff and Press TV

Related Interviews:

In an article today by Robert Parry in Consortium News, an intelligence source we know to be a ranking White House official told Parry the US is sitting on satellite imagery depicting Ukrainian forces shooting down MH17.

“What I’ve been told by one source, who has provided accurate information on similar matters in the past, is that U.S. intelligence agencies do have detailed satellite images of the likely missile battery that launched the fateful missile, but the battery appears to have been under the control of Ukrainian government troops dressed in what look like Ukrainian uniforms.

The source said CIA analysts were still not ruling out the possibility that the troops were actually eastern Ukrainian rebels in similar uniforms but the initial assessment was that the troops were Ukrainian soldiers. There also was the suggestion that the soldiers involved were undisciplined and possibly drunk, since the imagery showed what looked like beer bottles scattered around the site, the source said.”

Kerry Accusation a Hoax

A careful read of the Washington Post statement that has been widely misquoted regarding the source of the missile said to be used is a telling sign of how far controlled media will go.  Nowhere in the Post article does Kerry make statements about the source a missile.  Instead, the post quotes, as they nearly always do now, an “unnamed source” that makes the outlandish statement and then attributes other statements to Secretary Kerry hoping to confuse readers and unwary journalists.

Post writer, Michael Birnbaum, has often been tied to AIPAC/ADL generated propaganda and hoax stories including several about Syria, imaginary US imposed “no fly zones” and reports of massive US troop deployment in Jordan, 20,000 troops and more.

Dozens of journalists around the world were “burned” by these stories, all of which were structured to seem to attribute to real sources but, upon careful read, were without foundation.  Similarly, the Huffington Post, Daily Beast, Newsweek, New York Times and Wall Street Journal do exactly the same thing, operating; it would seem to a trained observer, off “talking points.”

Parry’s “White Hat”

Robert Parry has strong backing in Washington and has broken many quality stories in the past.  This one may be “spiritually true” but may well reflect something else.  You see, when a story can’t be told, say if it incriminates NATO or Israel along with the post-coup Kiev ultra-nationalist junta, a plausible story that deflects the dangerous psychological warfare campaign afoot is created.

Were one to comply with the tenets of counter-psyop procedures, the Parry story, even if a bomb were planted on the plane, something evidence on the ground supports, would serve White House goals, particularly during a time when focus on a Gaza truce and nuclear agreement with Iran are the real agenda items and MH17 is “something else.”

By “something else,” MH17, a planned demolition, bomb or missile, this required planning, centralized command and control and, as we have seen inexorably, control of the Kiev air control system and access to their radars.

Case for a Bomb

In 2009, Umar Mutallab, a mentally defective young African student whose banking family has close CIA/Mossad ties, was arrested in Detroit.

He had a bomb in his underwear.  Mutallab was sitting in a VIP First Class seat on a plane that took off from Schipol Airport in Amsterdam, where ill-fated MH17 took off also.  Mutallab arrived from Lagos without a passport or visa or even ticket.  He was escorted through Schipol, around border control by former Mossad agents working for ICTS, the Israeli company that runs security at that and many other airports.

He was then put on a plane for the US, walked around more security, no ticket, no passport, no visa, no luggage, unwashed, incoherent and put in a $20,000 seat by “a man in a suit.”  Detroit attorney Kurt Haskell and his wife saw it all and went to the authorities.  This is their statement, made just prior to the trial of Mutallab in Detroit:

“With jury selection set to begin in the Underwear Bomber Trial set to begin tomorrow, I’ve spent the evening reminiscing about Christmas Day 2009 and the 21 months since. The Underwear Bomber attack has fundamentally changed my life. Not in the way most would think, but it has destroyed any faith I’ve had in the U.S. Government, the media and this country as a whole. To say that I believe the government is corrupt and the media is complicit doesn’t fully explain my beliefs. Not only have I come to those conclusions, but I’ve witnessed that an ordinary person who sees something important can be silenced despite his efforts to spread the truth. Such is the Underwear Bomber case. I can do nothing but laugh at the TSA’s new policy of ‘If you see something say something.’ That is exactly what I did, and not only did the US Government not want to hear what I had to say, but it actively lied about it, attempted to get me to change my story, and hid, by withholding (secret government) evidence or putting a protective order on the evidence and nearly everything that would support my eyewitness account.”

What we can prove, beyond doubt, is that security at Schipol Airport places bombs on planes.  Moreover, what is not seen, certainly not on satellite which could show this very clearly, is how widespread the wreckage is from MH17.

Everyone has seen photos of huge sections of the plane, pristine and uncharred.  There is never context for where these are but simply photos showing them “un-adjacent” to the crash scene, as though they had floated down from 33,000 feet as a result of a large internal explosion.

This is not how a BUK system works.  A BUK tracks a radio signal put out by an aircraft engine.  Every jet engine is a type of radio transmitter and missiles are attuned to these frequencies.  They fly near the engine where a proximity fuse detects the plane.  The missile explodes sending 70 pounds in this case, of steel ball bearings into the engine, fuel lines and hydraulic controls.  This engine will stop, a fire will erupt and the plane will lose control and fall to earth in one piece.

In most cases, the tail section breaks off at impact and suffers less damage but is found close by.  In the case of the plane that is said to have hit the Pentagon on 9/11, there was no tail section or wings or luggage or passengers, in fact no wreckage at all, not until the second day at least but that’s another story.  I mention it here because the real story here is lying.  This is all about lying and nothing about terrorism.

Conclusion

Did the Obama White House put this story out to “cool off” the psyop long traced to Israel, and AIPAC/ADL?  If a bomb were believed to be the culprit, something we have confirmed through real sources, would such a story, leaked through Parry, as respected journalist, be the only possible way of restoring sanity and bringing at least some of the guilty to justice?

GD/HMV

Related Posts:



The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT, VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians, or the Veterans Today Network and its assigns. LEGAL NOTICE - COMMENT POLICY

Posted by on July 25, 2014, With 9888 Reads Filed under WarZone. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

FaceBook Comments

26 Responses to "White House ‘leak’: Ukraine did it"

  1. Prospero  July 26, 2014 at 3:58 pm

    Any of you well informed military types have information on joint exercises “Rapid Trident” Scheduled for March 2014 as of the start of the year; postponed “until July of 2014” according to all media reports and the official Facebook page and then as of the beginning of this month, nothing. Two weeks before the downing of MH17 all systems go but nothing specific and then no mention of highly publicized exercises going into August.Not even announcement of their cancellation like in March. Point to consider the number of exercises and simulations mimicking actual subsequent attacks, false flag or otherwise.

  2. lieutenantM  July 26, 2014 at 1:51 pm

    Ummmm,…. Gordo? Ya want to run this “conclusion” by me again. so i can try to decipher wtf you are saying here?

    Did the Obama White House put this story out to “cool off” the psyop long traced to Israel, and AIPAC/ADL? If a bomb were believed to be the culprit, something we have confirmed through real sources, would such a story, leaked through Parry, as respected journalist, be the only possible way of restoring sanity and bringing at least some of the guilty to justice?

    2LT Dennis Morrisseau USArmy [Armor – Vietnam era] retired. W Pawlet, VT dmorso1
    802 645 9727

  3. Harold Saive  July 26, 2014 at 12:35 pm

    No Boeing-777 aircraft was shot down based on analysis of crime scene evidence
    http //www.veteranstoday.com/2014/07/26/mh-17-hoax-crash-site-evidence-reveals-no-boeing-777-engine/

  4. JS  July 26, 2014 at 11:35 am

    Article conclusion, “This is all about lying and nothing about terrorism.” There are stories about already-dead, putrid bodies on the plane. And a tale about 100+ AIDS delegates on the plane, which was changed to only 6. So let’s take a look at another possibility. If indeed there are 6 missing AIDS researchers, is it possible that they are alive and were spirited away, willingly or unwillingly, into a secret black research program? In that case, their deaths in a plane crash would not be questioned too much. And everything else about this plane crash is crazy, so why not this part of it?

    • Venice  July 26, 2014 at 11:57 am

      Hm, you make a rather plausible observation, JS.

  5. Venice  July 26, 2014 at 9:55 am

    Alas, infighting and ‘outings’ (finger-pointing) are frequently a byproduct of a diabolical deceptive scheme gone awry!

  6. Christina  July 26, 2014 at 7:11 am

    It must be simple to see if it was a bomb or a missile that caused the downing of MH17 by studying the shape of the wreckage from the plane. There must be a few pictures too with this information. Still waiting for confirmation here.

    • rolan  July 26, 2014 at 8:50 am

      Indents on the exterior (so far; other analyses should corroborate the findings — I would be VERY surprised if not), yes. “Still waiting for confirmation”… Let’s *wait*, agreed!, of course.

  7. Cold Wind  July 26, 2014 at 5:28 am

    Travelers need to give the ICTS and the Schipol Airport in Amsterdam a wide berth when visiting Europe.

  8. warmingmyth  July 26, 2014 at 5:17 am

    To Gordon Duff
    There appears to be a vast MSM and other media disinformation campaign saying that BUK missiles cause shredding of the airframe and cause the aircraft to break up in the air. Here is an example in the UK Daily Mail
    http //www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2697669/Almost-board-known-happening-Expert-describes-effect-missile-hit-MH17.html
    Can you give further evidence of airframes remaining intact after a hit by one of these missiles.

    • stephanaugust  July 26, 2014 at 6:11 am

      So what? On September 11, 2001 the Daily Mail reported that Muslims flew into buildings. The MSM has a job to do.

    • warmingmyth  July 26, 2014 at 12:28 pm

      All you have done is to confirm my description of disinformation but refused to answer the question.
      What I was looking for was either some computer simulation or else historical records of the effects of these missiles on a large plane such as a B-52 bomber.

  9. stephanaugust  July 25, 2014 at 8:56 pm

    On the original MH17 the distance from the letters “MRD” to “ia” in “Malaysia” are about 35 meters. Isn’t it amazing that these two details landed with almost the same distance so that we can identify flight MH17? Can someone calculate the mathematical probability?

    • joe chuy-medina  July 26, 2014 at 8:02 am

      @stephena
      several have noticed how the tail section appears to have been “planted for the photo,” or someone stood it up. The other part is less proof though, since MRD and MRP planes were “apparently” identical in window configuration on that day, at least. there should be at least 3 more “MRD” on the plane parts, if they have not conveniently been burned!

      as for the plane crashing near a road -it is at the edge of the city. not so improbable.
      as we used to say in my factory, “statistics will tell you anything if you torture the data long enough.”

      joe

  10. JS  July 25, 2014 at 8:19 pm

    I think the story that “Ukrainians did it, but it was an accident and they were drunk” was planned from the beginning to be the WH ending position, one that could have almost everyone heaving a sigh of relief that we don’t have another Cuban Missile Crisis on our hands. And yes, all this screaming and pointing of fingers at Russia has been a great diversion. But I have one question. Why doesn’t Russia expose the real game, since they have been used and abused so shabbily?

  11. rolan  July 25, 2014 at 6:06 pm

    > Case for a Bomb

    It’s an AAM — look here

    http //www.ad-hoc-news.de/neues-deutschland-nva-raketenspezialist-mh17-nicht-von–/de/News/37955823

    Can you read German?, I fear translate.google is not enough.

    Read also

    http //vineyardsaker.blogspot.com/2014/07/and-few-more-pointers-from-saker.html

    And for ref

    http //www.globalresearch.ca/mh17-verdict-real-evidence-points-to-us-kiev-cover-up-of-failed-false- flag/5393317?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=mh17-verdict-real-evidence-points-to-us-kiev-cover-up-of-failed-false-flag

    • rolan  July 25, 2014 at 6:08 pm

      Addendum

      Taylor_paper_Ustica_illustrated.pdf as well (VERY recommended).

    • rolan  July 25, 2014 at 6:27 pm

      URL http //aviation-safety.net/pubs/other/Taylor_paper_Ustica_illustrated.pdf

      Lessons from the Ustica investigations / A. Frank Taylor …
      Aviation Safety Network
      1. A case history involving wreckage analysis. The following paper was presented by invitation to a conference in Rome during. October 1998 etc.

  12. Frankly Speaking  July 25, 2014 at 6:00 pm

    Gordon,

    If its a bomb, its not possible to predict where the bulk of the plane is going to land. in all likelihood, it would land in rural farmland. but it happens to have landed on a road (both sides, with the road itself clear!), which is a very low probability event. How do you explain this?

    Why do the aircraft pieces look like they were cut with an electric saw?

    • Gordon Duff  July 25, 2014 at 6:41 pm

      roads happen, this is how things grown on farms get to market, even in Ukraine. I was told by reliable friends that all roads in Ukraine were built so nazi gas vehicles would have something to drive on

    • stephanaugust  July 25, 2014 at 9:07 pm

      “Why do the aircraft pieces look like they were cut with an electric saw?”

      The Council for Foreign Special FX had no real bomb.

  13. Preston James, Ph.D  July 25, 2014 at 5:45 pm

    Outstanding article that exposes the inner workings of another apparent zio false flag to bring America into another major war, perhaps with Russia this time, but with East Ukraine for sure. This is the only explanation that makes real sense and explains the background occurrences and the motivations at play.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login


TOP 50 READ ARTICLES THIS MONTH
From Veterans Today Network