Einsteins Theory on Magnetic Buoyancy…

isis_036

Einsteins theory on magnetic buoyancy and its application to the space time continuum or gravity.

AKA Einsteins Theory of Gravity.

 

…by  Wiley E. Coyote, Particle Physicist

Kindly assisted by Jeff Smith with Gordon Duff interfering as little as possible

 

Editor’s note:  Wiley E. Coyote has, as seems to be increasingly the case, changed the world as we see it.  More is coming.  Our history has been stolen, not just politically but scientifically as well, that and the technology that was going to create a paradise on earth.  We are and will continue to publish materials wrongly classified that could have done so much.  This is one of them.

In recently discovered G-2 documents that had been buried away for over 70 years located at the Los Alamos National Nuclear Archive; titled:

“The personal correspondence between Albert Einstein, Dr. Robert Oppenheimer and Dr. Edward Teller concerning the magnetic effects of the nuclear plasma fire ball on the Space Time Continuum”.

1945 to 1954. G-2. Classified secret. Q clearance required. Library copy. Read only. Do not copy. Inter office use only.

The Atomic Energy Commission / DOE. It has been discovered that after an intense study by the A.E.C on the effects of the plasma fire ball in a nuclear explosion. (See, The Effects of Nuclear Weapons. 1958, A.E.C – D.O.D.)


Personal correspondence monitored by G-2 between the above mentioned persons and several other prominent physicists working at the Los Alamos National Labs both during and after WW2 proves they had privately corresponded with Mr. Albert Einstein concerning the newly discovered effects of Magnetic Buoyancy in a nuclear explosion.

Dating from information acquired in the July 1945 Trinity Nuclear test at Alamogordo, New Mexico, descriptions of both “the measured and observed effects” were quietly passed on to Mr. Einstein from 1945 to 1954 by visiting physicists from Los Alamos National Labs that were attending scientific meetings at Princeton University. Their intent was in proving Einsteins Space Time Continuum Theory and his theories on Relativity.

G-2 reports that Mr Einstein did confirm that the data provided to him by his fellow colleagues paralleled his work and that the concept of magnetic buoyancy in a confined plasma would confirm his theory’s on the Space Time Continuum and Gravity. The concept being that all space is curved due to magnetic lines of force forming the fabric of space, ie., Space Time. Therefore,  magnetic buoyancy could be the true cause of gravity.

By pushing out theses magnetic lines of force or manipulating them in other ways, a person could easily manipulate gravity by the use of highly charged plasmas in confinement forming a magnetic or gravitational shield around a space craft. Einsteins descriptions could then be interpreted as describing gravity wells, space time distortions and worm holes as simple manipulations of the solar systems magnetic field lines surrounding the earth or a space ship.

The concept of creating magnetic bubbles (similar to the earths magnetosphere) surrounding a space craft in flight would also lead to the possibilities of faster than light speeds.

Due to national security concerns at the time and the ongoing investigations against prominent Los Alamos physicists for leaking classified data on the atomic bomb program to non security cleared physicists, lead to a complete black out on this information from becoming public.

However both Teller and Oppenheimer did quietly confirm that Einstein was correct and said that in the future it should be called “Einsteins magnetic buoyancy theory of Gravity”.

By Wile E. Coyote particle Physicist.

Editing:  Jim W. Dean

__________________________________

Related Posts:

  • No Related Posts


The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT, VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians, or the Veterans Today Network and its assigns. LEGAL NOTICE - COMMENT POLICY

Posted by on September 17, 2014, With 5628 Reads Filed under WarZone. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

FaceBook Comments

29 Responses to "Einsteins Theory on Magnetic Buoyancy…"

  1. Allesandro  September 21, 2014 at 3:12 am

    So, Tesla was destroyed by J.P. Morgan (member of the Dreadful Few), while Einstein (also a member of the Dreadful Few) was promoted in an act of MS-direction, to lead us in the wrong direction. This has cost humanity in a million different ways.

    All the wars over resources, etc. could have been avoided. A life with free-energy, and the creativity that would be UN-leached, advancements that follow. How can we even estimate the damage done to us all?

  2. Ahab  September 20, 2014 at 4:03 am

    I think E=mc2 guy is a crock of sh*t by someone who doubted his own ideas proving thereby.

  3. Paul V. Sheridan  September 19, 2014 at 8:26 am

    Given his reputation for religiopolitics, Einstein was offered the presidency of “Israel” in 1952; offered without the need for citizenship or a democratic election. Due to his public involvement in the formation-of and his true loyalty to “Israel,” Einstein declined, babbling

    “I am deeply moved by the offer from our State of Israel, and at once saddened and ashamed that I cannot accept it.”

    This proposal came from Prime Minister David Ben Gurion, the same “ally” who later established Operation Cyanide which resulted in the murdering of thirty-four and the maiming of hundreds of American service men during multiple Israeli attacks on June 8, 1967 against the U.S.S. Liberty. Einstein kept such great company, eh?

    But the reason he declined is KEY.

  4. urbanb  September 18, 2014 at 12:45 pm

    Magnetic Buoyancy publicly confirmed this year

    http //www.news.com.au/technology/science/nasa-tests-impossible-microwave-engine-that-produces-fuel-out-of-empty-space-and-finds-that-it-works/story-fnjwlcze-1227012542098

    This may seem like something different … but digging into the equations it is the same phenomenon…

  5. FauxScienceSlayer  September 18, 2014 at 11:22 am

    Bored to tears after years of fighting the dogmatic, false paradigm of Carbon climate forcing, i wrote a series of articles at Canada Free Press on a possible Rotational Universe model, instead of the dogmatic big bang nonsense. I was shocked by the discoveries proving this model, and the axiomatic time travel condition, which gave this technology ‘national security’ status.

    “95% of the Universe is composed of math particles and hyper-dense equations”….OR NOT !

    See Cosmology tab at FauxScienceSlayer….you’ll be stunned by this reality.

  6. mary1011  September 18, 2014 at 8:56 am

    Dr. DONALD SCOTT – he has great viedos on electric currents in space, check him out on YouTube, easy to follow & understand.

    • Paul V. Sheridan  September 19, 2014 at 8:30 am

      mary1011 You might enjoy

      https //www.youtube.com/watch?v=uKG7HFM21Qk

      As you watch this Scott lecture, remember that the fornication cousin-marrying pervert Einstein was adamant that “space is a vacuum.”

  7. Detlef Reimers  September 18, 2014 at 5:16 am

    It is not by incident, that so many of the really “breakthrough” ideas and developments have been made by people, who were not directly part of the scientific establishment. This part was managed and controlled from early times on to a growing degree by the ruling elite.

    Now, this process of scientific control is coming to end, because the evidence from outsiders already amounts to such an extend, that it can only be shut down by brute force – a method which is, when seen on a larger time scale, only their last weopon and they are already running out of time with their efforts.

    Real scientist and engineers have managed to slip through this elite control raster at any time in history and although their achivements could be hidden for a long time, it’s simply in the nature of humans with enough genious, to search for the truth and get deeper insights of nature.

    The shutdown of real economy in many of the western nations parallels this process. It is deeply routed in the mystical foundations and beliefs of the english (US?) aristocracy, which then also began to mingle and marry with the jewish aristocracy. This special conglomerate produced the explosive mixture of suppressing not only the masses of people, but also honest trade and business enterprise, substituting it more and more with criminal enterprises of the evolving banking cartell.

    • Detlef Reimers  September 18, 2014 at 5:16 am

      Aristocrats always were Feudalists, they also love Fascism – no problem with that at all, they wish it back.

      The scientific part of this led to the totally fradulent situation whe are now facing in the western world. Newton, the black magician who opposed any form of basic hypothesis as basis for a scientific experiment or groundwork, did not have the intellectual honesty and capability of deep understanding of nature. Galbraith showed the “Real Newton” in his famous book.

      If you look at the persons who got Nobel Prices in economy (the last one may be the worst of all!), you already know, that no one of them really dealt with economy but with black money magic.

      Why should physics not be part of this fradulent scientific enterprice? Read the real Bertrand Russel and you will be frightened, what his real aims are. Prince Phillip already dreamt in public of reincarnation as a deadly virus.

  8. Paul V. Sheridan  September 17, 2014 at 9:23 pm

    The four papers published in 1905 with Einstein’s signature included

    1. Concerning an Heuristic Point of View Toward the Emission and Transformation of Light.
    2. On the Movement of Small Particles Suspended in Stationary Liquids Required by the Molecular-Kinetic Theory of Heat.
    3. On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies.
    4. Does the Inertia of a Body Depend upon its Energy Content?

    Allegedly these four papers were assembled, solely by Einstein, in less than seven months, AND NONE UNDERWENT PEER REVIEW. Subsequently, there was a deafening uproar of suspicion from the science community regarding everything from originality to veracity. Did your high school physics teacher review that historical uproar?

    Detailed scientific and historical review of each of these four papers, and “his” 1915 paper on the General Theory of Relativity, reveals a consistent pattern of impossibility, implausibility and inveracity.

    • Paul V. Sheridan  September 17, 2014 at 9:29 pm

      Whether reviewing the blatant, the subtle, or everything in-between, you find subterfuge in true history of Time Magazine’s ‘Person of the Century.’ The most blatant subterfuge involves the equation E = mc2. The Big Media promotion that this equation and its precepts were formulated by Einstein is a vicious lie. Implicated for plagiarism, annus mirabilis #4 never mentioned the equation! Einstein and his handlers made that claim a year later, but only as a matter of gatekeeping.

    • Paul V. Sheridan  September 17, 2014 at 9:35 pm

      And the notion that Einstein was the original thinker behind the concept of the ‘equivalence of mass and energy’ borders on the adolescent. The original ideas that ultimately arrived at that concept were formulated and published by Scottish genius James Clark Maxwell in 1878; that is, 27 years before annus mirabilis #4.

      Given that the essence of Einstein is merely the thought games called “gedanken,” this plagiarist had no experimental basis to lay claim to ANY aspect of E = mc2.

      In stark contrast, hard data sustained by Joseph J. Thompson in Cambridge and Walter Kaufmann in Gottingen, in 1890, had already confirmed during “cavity radiation” experiments that mass and energy were proportional.

      In 1900, the French genius Henri Ponicare` had already written the math in the form conducive to electromagnetism m = E/c2 ! Therefore, even the proportionality constant of c2 was already established.

      It is suspected that the DIRECT plagiarism by Einstein of E = mc2 came from the 1904 publications of Hungarian physicist and university professor Freidrich Hasenohrl. Hasenohrl won the Haitinger prize from the Austrian Academy of Sciences for these publications.

      Prior to dying of advanced stages of STD, he is quoted

      “You imagine that I look back on my life’s work with calm satisfaction. But from nearby it looks quite different. There is not a single concept of which I am convinced that it will stand firm, and I feel uncertain whether I am in general on the right track.”

  9. Cold Wind  September 17, 2014 at 7:22 pm

    In an admittedly superficial way, I find it all very interesting, gravity wells, magnetic buoyancy, space-time, fields, quantums and continuums (whatever happened btw to ‘discreetness’ in physics– the idea that at the most fundamental level nature is discrete?). Is there really a classified version of physics’, akin to Richard Dolan’s notion of a “Breakaway Civilization”, as opposed the Physics taught to us ordinary plebs? If the physics hinted at in this article is true, then there are at least two separate trajectories defining two different branches of the human species. One of which (the secret, highly classified branch) may have already developed the means to travel to the stars. The other branch, comprising the vast majority of mankind, is being systematically deprived of the means for its own survival. Guess which branch you are in?

  10. Jack Heart  September 17, 2014 at 4:40 pm

    ‘There was a brilliant flash that illuminated the atmosphere and emitted a pressure wave and cloud that had a diameter of about one kilometer. After a brief period of darkness the cloud became spotted with explosions of a pale blue color. The sharp outline dissipated after about ten seconds and the color lightened.’

    Those pale blue explosions wouldn’t be tears opening up in the fabric of the continuum now would they? If the adjustments were instantaneous nobody would ever even notice that they don’t even really exist anymore; at least not in the world that was before the blast. Now what would be the implications of that? Maybe Fermi was right. Maybe none of this should have ever even been attempted…

    Just having some fun Mr. Duff, I know you are. I’ll go back to my algae.

    • MDK  September 17, 2014 at 9:09 pm

      Just a thought, which came first the chicken or the egg. Which came first magnetism, gravity or electricity. Magnetism wins, if anything gravity and electricity are effects of magnetism. If a body has it’s own magnetic field and can be directed to another body’s magnetic field they will attract or repel just like regular toy magnets and thus if the magnetic field is strong enough, controlled and directed a body on earth could be sent back and forth to a body on the moon and it would be called space travel with no solid fuel or pollution. Maybe that’s the way Wyle Cyote does it and aint telling how just yet.

  11. cynthiamaccioli  September 17, 2014 at 4:16 pm

    There’s mountains of evidence regarding Einstein’s plagiarism. He was a fraud. But smart enough to stand on the shoulders of giants and steal their works (with nary a footnote). How about I go to the AMA and tell them I have a cure for cancer, no references, no scientific data, no lab results and did I mention I never got through college? How well would I be received? Then again, my name isn’t Cohen or Horowitz.
    Einstein was a thief, a rabid Zionist, lived like a pig and treated women like dogs. He was a boor with the right connections and blood line, nothing more.

    • matthewmccauley  September 17, 2014 at 10:12 pm

      Albert Einstein (1879 -1955), Time Magazine’s “Person of the Century”, wrote a long treatise on special relativity theory (it was actually called “On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies”, 1905a), without listing any references. Many of the key ideas it presented were known to Lorentz (for example, the Lorentz transformation) and Poincaré before Einstein wrote the famous 1905 paper.

      As was typical of Einstein, he did not discover theories; he merely commandeered them. He took an existing body of knowledge, picked and chose the ideas he liked, then wove them into a tale about his contribution to special relativity. This was done with the full knowledge and consent of many of his peers, such as the editors at Annalen der Physik.

      from http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/esp_einstein.htm

    • Detlef Reimers  September 18, 2014 at 4:46 am

      There is even more to it, that can be noticed more and more to be the direction, which the official science takes. It’s the neglectance of experience and the subjugation to more and more complex assumptions on the theoretical level, which don’t need any evidence at all. One very good source, which describes this process is “The trouble with physics” from Lee Smolin. He is rather moderate in his critique, but to the end of his book he addresses the pressure which build up by leading mathematicians, only posing to be physicians. They want their own ideal mathematical world of physics, based on their rather comical assumptions to justify their fundamentally flawed junk science.
      Einstein was the one, who – personally and methodically – founded this scientific “Elfenbeinturm”.

    • Detlef Reimers  September 18, 2014 at 9:41 am

      General theory of Relativity was in fact not proven by the time the crews spread over several places of the world to watch the Mercury anomaly. It was later thouroughly reinvestigated by several experts (including germans) and they came to the conclusion, that most of it must have been fabricated (lack of precise and synchrone measurement technology at that time). Today, it’s even a greater endevour, you have to syncronize several observatoriums and put this through some complicated autocorrelation procedures to get the real data from it.

      Some of the mathematical methods, used by these kinds of experiments, where only avaliable later than 1913. The second thing with this is, that there is a rather simple classical explanation of the double effect, which should – at that time – proove the ART of Einstein. There is lots of literature on this, some of them are good – most of them are bad and invected misinformation.

    • Paul V. Sheridan  September 19, 2014 at 8:23 am

      You babble, “But Es theories whether partially borrowed or rediscovered have been confirmed by experiments.”

      ROTFL! What experiments? Which “Es theories”?? What the heck is “Es”? You haven’t fooled anyone with these utterly nonsensical posts.

  12. Gordon Duff  September 17, 2014 at 3:39 pm

    Peter,
    The issue has arisen again in the descriptors of the forces holding atoms together based on observable phenomenon in LENR fission reactions.

    We published on this two days ago. It will raise you level of confidence as the experimental model for proofs are relatively, if you will excuse the pun, simple and reproduce with embarrassing consistency.

  13. Bente  September 17, 2014 at 3:09 pm

    That sounds like the BEST explanation of gravity so far… I am sure I am not the only one who wondered why this big “mystery” about gravity… however if true as all things have an up and a down side… hm.. I can foresee a million horrid weapons that does exactly that … just sucks us up and out… hey, where did Bente or Gordon or Jim go… but then the upside is we could also do it to Obama, McCain, the whole Senate, the Congress the EU’s so called leaders… before they do it to us…. maybe that is what they did to the first Malaysia Airline… whoops suck it up… here comes the Presidents’ airplane… one moment it is here, next its gone.

  14. Paul V. Sheridan  September 17, 2014 at 10:07 am

    http //www.youtube.com/watch?v=fMTQFFFeOVs

    “We men are deplorable creatures. But compared with these women, every one of us is king, for he stands more or less on his own two feet, not constantly waiting for something outside of himself to cling to. They, however, always wait for someone to come along who will use them as he sees fit. If this does not happen, they simply fall to pieces.”

    Albert Einstein, Princeton University Press, The Expanded Quotable Einstein, (2000) pages 306 – 307.

    “The nation (Germany) has been on the decline mentally and morally since 1870. Behind the Nazi party stands the German people, who elected Hitler after he had in his book and in his speeches made his shameful intentions clear beyond the possibility of misunderstanding. The Germans can be killed or constrained after the war, but they cannot be re-educated to a democratic way of thinking and acting.”

    Albert Einstein, upon being deported by German Minister Josef Goebbels in 1933 or face criminal prosecution for theft of intellectual property.

    • Paul V. Sheridan  September 17, 2014 at 10:13 am

      http //www.youtube.com/watch?v=xCNZPjyxD1E

    • Paul V. Sheridan  September 17, 2014 at 10:16 am

      As one studies Einstein more closely, what emerges is a person more adept in politics, especially religiopolitics, rather than the media promotions regarding his ability in science. In 1943 two infamous USSR propagandists, Solomon Mikhoels and Itsik Fefer, were invited to tour the United States to solicit support of the Joseph Stalin regime. The National Reception Committee arranged their visits; it was formed and chaired by Einstein. The 1946 publication of the ‘Black Book’ is based on the “anthologies” accumulated by Mikhoels and Fefer, and was published by the Jewish Black Book Committee. This committee was co-chaired by Einstein. The Black Book preface was authored by Einstein. For this and other efforts, Pravda named Einstein to its 1947 list of ‘Top-Ten Friends of the Soviet Union.’

    • Paul V. Sheridan  September 17, 2014 at 10:16 am

      One of Einstein’s deepest ties to the USSR manifested in the traitors Ethel and Julius Rosenberg. There is also abundant evidence that Einstein was a confidant and close friend of notorious Soviet spy Klaus Fuchs. Along with Morton Sobell , these Soviet spies openly admitted to espionage involving massive leakage of highly classified nuclear weapons technology stolen from our ultra secret Manhattan Project. As a direct result, on August 29, 1949 the USSR successfully tested its first nuclear warhead, initiating the most massive and dangerous arms race in human history. (One could argue that the Ronald Reagan victory in the Cold War arms race produced the military inventory that later underpinned the Project for a New American Century; a result Reagan could not have anticipated.) In 1953 President Truman received a letter demanding that the Rosenbergs be pardoned. The letter did not attempt to trivialize the evidence or exonerate any defendants, but had blatant ‘the enemy of my enemy is my friend’ overtones. The letter, which coyly avoids stating that the USSR was his friend or that Germany was his enemy, was signed by Albert Einstein.

    • Old Jules  September 17, 2014 at 10:49 am

      Paul V. Sheridan – You wouldn’t make a freckle on Einstein’s left buttock but you’re blowing factoids around claiming he was connected to the Rosenbergs and that he was better at ‘religious’ physics than some other kind. Cite some sources if there are any. Sources based on something more dependable than your deranged imagination.

    • matthewmccauley  September 17, 2014 at 10:16 pm

      Einstein was a victim. Helpless and honest, brave and true. Real scientists used to show up when he spoke and ask him questions he could not understand, nevermind answer, and laugh.

      He stole it all. Sounds familiar…

    • matthewmccauley  September 18, 2014 at 8:04 pm

      Hi Peter AG. E=MC2 was never his in the first place. I truly do not know if it is sound, as I am kind of dumb, but the point remains that he stole the work.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login


TOP 50 READ ARTICLES THIS MONTH
From Veterans Today Network