Jonas E. Alexis graduated from Avon Park High School, studied mathematics and philosophy as an undergraduate at Palm Beach Atlantic University, and has a master's degree in education from Grand Canyon University.

Some of his main interests include the history of Christianity, U.S. foreign policy, the history of the Israel/Palestine conflict, and the history of ideas. He is the author of the new book ,Christianity & Rabbinic Judaism: A History of Conflict Between Christianity and Rabbinic Judaism from the first Century to the Twenty-first Century.

He is currently teaching mathematics in South Korea. He plays soccer and basketball in his spare time. He is also a cyclist. He is currently writing a book tentatively titled Zionism and the West.

Alexis welcomes comments, letters, and queries in order to advance, explain, and expound rational and logical discussion on issues such as the Israel/Palestine conflict, the history of Christianity, and the history of ideas.

In the interest of maintaining a civil forum, Alexis asks that all queries be appropriately respectful and maintain a level of civility. As the saying goes, “iron sharpens iron,” and the best way to sharpen one’s mind is through constructive criticism, good and bad.

However, Alexis has no patience with name-calling and ad hominem attack. He has deliberately ignored many queries and irrational individuals in the past for this specific reason—and he will continue to abide by this policy.


View Latest Posts >>>

Rape and Sex in German Cities After World War II Revisited (Part II)

 

“The women were raped, not once or twice but ten, twenty, thirty and a hundred times, and it was all the same to the Russians whether they raped mere children or old women.”[1]

 

…by Jonas E. Alexis

 

goodrichVirtually nothing can be compared to what the Allied Forces did to German women after World War II. I honestly thought I knew enough about the brutal torture that the German civilians went through until I started reading Thomas Goodrich’s book.

M. Douglas’ Orderly and Humane is the most rigorous work I have ever read on this particular subject, but Douglas understandably did not or could not cover everything in a 500-page book.

I certainly was quite pleased and honored when a friend of mine asked me if I wanted to review Thomas Goodrich’s Hellstorm: The Death of Nazi Germany, 1944-1947. She immediately got me in touch with the author, who graciously sent me a copy of the book.

If you have read Orderly and Humane and found it to be eye-opening, then there is no doubt that you will find Hellstorm worth your time. Goodrich is to be recommended for this painstakingly laborious work. He makes the historically convincing case that,

“Of all the methods used to express its anger, the Red Army said it best with rape. From eight to eighty, healthy or ill, indoors or out, in fields, on sidewalks, against walls, the spiritual massacre of German women continued unabated.

“When even violated corpses could no longer be of use, sticks, iron bars and telephone receivers were commonly rammed up their vaginas.”[2]

We have documented in the past that rape was the most obvious form of revenge against the Germans. The fact is that things were a lot worse than one would ever have imagined.

One witness acknowledged,

“The Russians were coming and going the whole time and they kept eyeing us greedily. The nights were dreadful because we were never safe for a moment.

“The women were raped, not once or twice but ten, twenty, thirty and a hundred times, and it was all the same to the Russians whether they raped mere children or old women.

“The youngest victim in the row houses where we lived was ten years of age and the oldest one was over seventy. . . . I am sure that wild and hungry animals would not have behaved any differently.”

Then this moving account by a young girl:

“When we were lying in bed at night we kept hearing steps coming up the stairs. . . . They beat on the door with their rifle-butts, until it was opened. Without any consideration for my mother and aunt, who had to get out of bed, we were raped by the Russians, who always held a machine pistol in one hand.

“They lay in bed with their dirty boots on, until the next lot came. As there was no light, everything was done by pocket torches, and we did not even know what the beasts looked like.”[3]

Thomas Goodrich

Thomas Goodrich

As we shall see, this is not an isolated case. How would you feel if your entire family was literally raped in public, in churches, around the clock, and in broad daylight—sometimes right in front of you?

How would you react if your mother was raped in your presence, or if your young sister was literally sexually tortured just two steps away from where you stand?

After a German by the name of Leonora was forcefully told to undress some German young girls for the Soviets, “The Commissar told me to watch and learn how to turn the Master Race into whimpering bits of misery.”[4] Listen to what happened next:

“Now two Poles came in, dressed only in trousers, and the girls cried out at their sight. They quickly grabbed the first of the girls, and bent her backwards over the edge of the table until her joints cracked.

“I was close to passing out as one of them took his knife and, before the very eyes of the other girls, cut off her right breast. He paused for a moment, then cut off the other side. I have never heard anyone scream as desperately as that girl.

“After this operation he drove his knife into her abdomen several times, which again was accompanied by the cheers of the Russians.

“The next girl cried for mercy, but in vain—it even seemed that the gruesome deed was done particularly slowly because she was especially pretty.

“The other three had collapsed, they cried for their mothers and begged for a quick death, but the same fate awaited them as well.

“The last of them was still almost a child, with barely developed breasts. They literally tore the flesh off her ribs until the white bones showed.

“Another five girls were brought in. They had been carefully chosen this time, all of them were well-developed and pretty. When they saw the bodies of their predecessors they began to cry and scream. Weakly, they tried desperately to defend themselves, but it did them no good as the Poles grew ever more cruel.

Germany after WWII

Germany after WWII

“They sliced the body of one of them open lengthwise and poured in a can of machine oil, which they tried to light. A Russian shot one of the other girls in the genitals before they cut off her breasts.

“Loud howls of approval began when someone brought a saw from a tool chest. This was used to tear up the breasts of the other girls, which soon caused the floor to be awash in blood. The Russians were in a blood frenzy. More girls were being brought in continually.

“I saw these grisly proceedings as through a red haze. Over and over again I heard the terrible screams when the breasts were tortured, and the loud groans at the mutilation of the genitals. . . .

“[I]t was always the same, the begging for mercy, the high-pitched scream when the breasts were cut and the groans when the genitals were mutilated. The slaughter was interrupted several times to sweep the blood out of the room and clear away the bodies. . . .

“When my knees buckled I was forced onto a chair. The Commissar always made sure that I was watching, and when I had to throw up they even paused in their tortures. One girl had not undressed completely, she may also have been a little older than the others, who were around seventeen years of age.

“They soaked her bra with oil and set in on fire, and while she screamed, a thin iron rod was shoved into her vagina until it came out her navel.

“In the yard entire groups of girls were clubbed to death after the prettiest of them had been selected for this torture. The air was filled with the death cries of many hundred girls.”[5]

That is just the beginning. One German victim lamented,

“[A] big Russian came in. He did not utter a single word, but looked around the room and then went to the back where all the young girls and women were sitting. He beckoned once with his finger to my sister.

“As she did not stand up at once, he went close up to her and held his machine pistol against her chin.

“Everyone screamed aloud, but my sister sat mutely there and was incapable of moving. Then a shot resounded. Her head fell to the side and the blood streamed out. She was dead instantly, without uttering a single sound.

“The bullet had gone from her chin to her brain and her skull was completely shattered. The Russian looked at us all, and went away again.”[6]

Some soldiers, who did not know that those beastly behaviors were taking place, later declared,

“The mothers had had to witness how their ten and twelve-year-old daughters were raped by some 20 men; the daughters in turn saw their mothers being raped, even their grandmothers. Women who tried to resist were brutally tortured to death. There was no mercy. . . .

“The women we liberated were in a state almost impossible to describe. . . .[T]heir faces had a confused, vacant look. Some were beyond speaking to, ran up and down and moaned the same sentences over and over again.

“Having seen the consequences of these bestial atrocities, we were terribly agitated and determined to fight. We knew the war was past winning; but it was our obligation and sacred duty to fight to the last bullet.”[7]


 No girl or nun one was exempt from being raped. One woman came to her priest and lamented, “Father, I can’t go on living! Thirty of them raped me last night.”[8]

Winston Churchill

Winston Churchill

One priest declared,

“The girls, women and nuns were raped incessantly for hours on end, the soldiers standing in queues, the officers at the head of the queues, in front of their victims.

“During the first night many of the nuns and women were raped as many as fifty times. Some of the nuns who resisted with all their strength were shot, others were ill-treated in a dreadful manner until they were too exhausted to offer any resistance.

“The Russians knocked them down, kicked them, beat them on the head and in the face with the butt-end of their revolvers and rifles, until they finally collapsed and in this unconscious condition became the helpless victims of brutish passion, which was so inhuman as to be inconceivable.

“The same dreadful scenes were enacted in the hospitals, homes for the aged, and other such institutions. Even nuns who were seventy and eighty years old and were ill and bedridden were raped and ill-treated by these barbarians.”[9]

In a diary of a Catholic priest from Klosterbrueck, we read:

January 21st, 1945. . . . Strange to say, the population intends to remain here, and is not afraid of the Russians.

“The reports that in one village they raped all the women and abducted all the men and took them away to work somewhere must surely have been exaggerated. How dreadful it would be if Goebbels was telling the truth after all!…

“January 25th. All night long Russians entered the chapel and searched and questioned us. They ordered the woman to go outside with her small child. . .

“[They] raped the woman and sent her back to us. She came back to the chapel, her small child in her arms, the tears streaming down her face. . . .

“During the morning three women from the village came to the chapel. The vicar hardly recognized them, for their faces were distorted with fear and terror. They told us that whole families had been shot by the Russians. . . .

“Girls who had refused to allow themselves to be raped, and parents who had sought to protect their  children, had been shot on the spot. . . .

January 27th.We priests were allowed out of the chapel for half an hour today in order to bury Margarethe in the yard. Poor girl, it is a good thing you were dead and so did not know what the Russians did to your body!

January 28th. The night was very troubled again. . . .Many of the nuns are getting very distressed and nervous. They sleep even less than we do. I often hear them say, ‘If only we had fled before the Russians arrived!’”[10]

One individual who actually spoke with the soldiers later wrote,

“In every village and town they entered, the German troops came upon scenes of horror: slain boys, People’s Army men drenched with gasoline and burned—and sometimes survivors to tell the tale of the outrages.

“In some villages, they surprised Russians warm in the beds of women they had taken, and found the bodies of the many French war prisoners who had died defending German women and children.

“Staggered by what he had seen and heard, a German officer tried desperately to make sense of the disaster; to understand the minds of men ‘who find . . . pleasure in raping the same woman over and over, dozens of times, even while other women are standing near.’”[11]

Goodrich notes,

“Those women pregnant, on their menstrual cycle, or enduring diarrhea, suffered like all the rest. Nothing, it seemed—not age, ailment or ugliness—could repel the Red rapist. Even death was no defense.

“‘I . . . saw some twenty Red Army men standing in line before the corpse of a woman certainly beyond sixty years of age who had been raped to death,’ one sickened witness recorded. ‘They were shouting and laughing and waiting for their satisfaction over her dead body.’”[12]


 Ask yourself again: how would you feel if members of your family were raped in ditches and even by the way sides—“and as a rule not once but several times”?

Or how about “a whole bunch of soldiers” seizing your precious little sister and raping her?[13] Or how about raping your 69-year old grandmother? Or how about finding your lovely young teacher into the woods and, well, used her like a female dog?

“They drove her out on the road stark naked, and many soldiers used her one after the other. She reached her village crawling on hands and knees along the ditch, through mud and snow.”[14]

Furthermore, what if soldiers of the Allied Forces told you that you had no option but to watch your family being beaten and raped? Wouldn’t that be worse than nightmare?

How would you continue to live with that kind of moral degradation and sexual replay in your mind? Do you see why many of those precious women and even their children ended up committing suicide?[15] One rape victim confessed,

“We screamed, we begged them to leave us in peace, but they showed us no mercy. We resolved to end our lives. Everyone had a knife and a piece of rope. Frau P. was first. Young Frau K. hanged her daughter and then herself. Her dear mother did the same with her sister.

“Now only two of us remained. I asked her to fix my rope for I was too upset to do it. Then we embraced one more time and kicked the luggage away on which we had stood.

“I, however, could touch the floor with my toes . . . the rope was too long. I tried over and over—I wanted to die. I looked to the right and to the left, we hung in a row. They were well off, they were dead. As for me, I had no choice but to free myself from the rope.”[16]


 Again, raping innocent civilians happened in nearly all the major cities of Germany. Goodrich writes,

“Soon after the fall of Danzig, hundreds of women and girls pleaded with an officer for protection. The Russian pointed to a Catholic cathedral.

“After the females were safely inside, the officer yelled to his men, motioned to the church, and with bells ringing and organ pipes roaring the horror continued all night. Some women inside were raped more than thirty times.

“‘They even violated eight-year-old girls and shot boys who tried to shield their mothers,’ groaned a priest.”

“Some women and children were assaulted ten, twenty, even thirty times a night and for a female to be ravished one hundred times a week was not uncommon. ‘One could hardly any longer call it raping . . . ,’ a victim moaned.”[17]

If you are upset about what you have read so far, fasten your seat belt. By the way, the Russians did go down to the beastly level. One priest from Rosenberg declared,

“Russian soldiers even went so far as to violate some of the female corpses that lay in the mortuary at the cemetery prior to burial.”[18]


Rape was one thing, but there was a lot more than that. The Soviets took over the education system in Germany after the event and began to brainwash young and impressionable people with their perverse version of history.[19]

Now here is the question: when was the last time you read a popular history book which honestly deals with those historical facts?

And do you think that Jewish ideologues like Daniel Jonah Goldhagen, Lucy Dawidowicz, Deborah Lipstadt, Jonah Goldberg, Max Boot, Bill Kristol, David Horowitz (to name just a few), will let you know about those stubborn facts? Wouldn’t that ruin their Zionist/diabolical heaven on earth?

If you are an avid reader and cannot remember the last time you pick up a book which addresses these issues, you have to admit that  you have been scammed and lied to.


Alexander Solzhenitsyn

Alexander Solzhenitsyn

Alexander Solzhenitsyn observed then,

“[A]ll of us knew very well that if the girls were Germans they could be raped and then shot. This was almost a combat distinction.”[20]

Solzhenitsyn was not speaking metaphorically. Some German civilians thought that they were safe when they found a shelter in a woodland barn near Schoeneiche. But, as we all know, appearance can be deceiving:

“They burst in, drunk with vodka and with victory, looking for women. When they saw only older women and children hiding behind a pile of carpets, they must have suspected that somewhere younger bodies were being concealed, and they started to ram their bayonets into the carpets. Here and there first and then systematically. . . .

“Nobody knows how many young girls were killed instantly that night. Eventually, the muffled cries of anguish and pain gave the hiding places away, and the victors started unrolling their prey. They chased those girls that had remained unhurt through the barn. . . .

“By then the barn looked like a battle field with wounded women on the floor right next to screaming and fighting victims forced to endure repeated and violent acts of rape.”[21]

It would be historically and morally proper to call this chapter in history the German Holocaust. And it is morally disgusting and despicable to say that those German civilians deserved what had happened to them, as some hoaxers have ridiculously suggested in the past.


When all is said and done, German cities were literally burned to ashes, people who were just “lucky” to survive the atrocities were devastated and morally humiliated, and major European countries were just scared to death to shelter people of German origins. In other words, the Allied Forces ideologically killed two birds with one stone.

The holy trinity

The holy trinity

Goodrich noted that there was an abiding hatred “of the Christian religion, particularly the Catholic Church,” among “hard-core communists.” As an example, Goodrich quoted a priest from Grottkau saying,

“He [one Russian soldier] was utterly godless and the sight of my priest’s robe apparently infuriated him. He kept insisting that I deny the existence of God and, seizing hold of my breviary, threw it onto the floor.

“Finally, he dragged me out into the street and pushed me against a wall in order to shoot me. . . . He had just placed me against the wall when all the men, women and children, who had been sheltering in the house . . . appeared on the scene. They stood around us, pale and terrified.

“Thereupon he began to scatter the crowd by shooting at random in every direction. When he and I were finally alone once more he pointed his revolver at me, but it was empty.

“He started reloading it, but whilst he was doing so, two other officers, who had apparently heard the shots, came into sight. They rushed up to him and snatched the revolver from his grasp. . . . [then] dragged him away.”[22]

Another priest wrote,

“He stood at the altar like a lord and eyed us triumphantly. Then he ordered our old vicar to go outside with him. After a quarter of an hour they returned. The expression on the vicar’s face was dreadful.

“He collapsed in front of the altar, muttering, ‘Shoot me, but shoot me here, at the altar. I refuse to leave the altar!’—The nuns screamed, ‘Don’t shoot! Don’t shoot!’ The Russian grinned, triumphant in his power and strength.With a lordly gesture he walked away from the vicar.”[23]

Goodrich writes,

“Lucky in these cases, most clergymen were not so fortunate. Many died in the prescribed Marxist manner: Bullet to the neck and skull bashed to bits. For some Soviets, nuns were an especial target of debasement. Reveals a priest from Klosterbrueck:

“‘They had been tortured and raped by officers for several hours. Finally they returned, their faces swollen and beaten black and blue. . . . [At] the neighboring village. . . . the Russians made all the nuns assemble in one room.

“‘Some of the younger nuns had managed to hide in the nick of time, in the water-cistern up in the attic. The rest of them were treated in a dreadful manner. They tried to defend themselves, but it was of no avail.

“‘They were brutally raped by the Russians,—even the oldest nuns, who were eighty. For four hours the Russians ransacked the house, behaving like wild animals. In the morning they then boasted in the village that there were no longer any virgins at the convent.’

“‘The nuns were completely exhausted when they came back. . . .We all sat there huddled together in one small room and prayed.’”[24]

When cities and towns basically ceased to exist, the Russian army focused on the countryside.

“Barns were burned, grain destroyed, even orchards and nurseries were chopped down or deliberately flattened by armored vehicles. Relates a Russian soldier:

“‘A lieutenant unsheathed a knife, walked up to a cow, and struck her a death-blow at the base of the skull. The cow’s legs folded under, and she fell, while the rest of the herd, bellowing madly, stampeded and ran away.

“The officer wiped the sharp edge on his boots and said: ‘My father wrote to me that the Germans had taken a cow from us. Now we are even.’”[25]


 The historical evidence is now clear: it is ludicrous to apply the adjective “unique” to “Nazi Holocaust.” German civilians had to endure a lot worse.

We certainly have been hoodwinked by the Holocaust establishment and the Zionist narrative, but there is hope. And Goodrich’s Hellstorm is certainly a superb material in this ideological war precisely because Goodrich plays by the historical rules.[26] He documents,

“Old men who had feebly tried to protect their wives, daughters and granddaughters, were themselves knocked down, then sawed in half or chopped to bits.

“A group of over fifty French POWs and Polish workers who had instinctively stepped in to protect the people were likewise castrated and killed.”[27]

Because of these atrocities, many of the well-known places in Germany quickly became vacant. Citing a physician with the army by the name of Lt. Heinrich Amberger, Goodrich writes, “Neither in Nemmersdorf nor in the other places did I find a single living German civilian.” Amberger previously declared,

“On the road through Nemmersdorf, near the bridge . . . I saw where a whole trek of refugees had been rolled over by Russian tanks; not only the wagons and teams, but also a goodly number of civilians, mostly women and children. . . .

“[They] had been squashed flat by the tanks. At the edge of the road and in the farm yards lay quantities of corpses of civilians who evidently . . . had been murdered systematically.”[28]

Another witness recounted,

“In the farmyard further down the road stood a cart, to which four naked women were nailed through their hands in a cruciform position. . . . Beyond . . . stood a barn and to each of its two doors a naked woman was nailed through the hands, in a crucified posture.

“In the dwellings we found a total of seventy-two women, including children, and one old man, 74, all dead . . . all murdered in a bestial manner, except only a few who had bullet holes in their necks. Some babies had their heads bashed in.

“In one room we found a woman, 84 years old, sitting on a sofa . . . half of whose head had been sheared off with an ax or a spade.”[29]


 In short, from 1944 to 1947, it was the worst time in history to be a German. Goodrich continues,

“For millions of Germans cut off on the Baltic coast by the rapid Russian advance, only one avenue of escape remained open—the sea. Even here, however, Soviet aircraft controlled the skies above and submarines prowled unseen below.

“In the various ports along the coast, thousands upon thousands of ragged, frozen refugees pressed to the water’s edge in hopes of landing a spot on one of the few vessels available. The numbers were so great and the fear so consuming that efforts to board when ships did dock often resembled riots.

“‘The crush to get on board was just terrible,’ a witness wrote from Pillau. ‘I saw a pram being squeezed out of all recognition by the pushing masses. One old man fell into the water and there was nothing one could do in the crush—also it was so cold he would have died on hitting the water.’

“Because armed guards had orders to evacuate as many women and children as possible, babies were used like tickets, with half-crazed mothers tossing infants down to relatives on the pier. Some children landed safely; some did not.

“If anything, the situation at Gotenhafen was even more horrific. As the Wilhelm Gustloff made ready to take on passengers in late January 1945, the ship’s crew were stunned by what they saw.

“‘There must have been 60,000 people on the docks . . . ,’ remembered second engineer,Walter Knust.

“‘[A]s soon as we let down the gangways people raced forward and pushed their way in. In the confusion a lot of children got separated from their parents. Either the kids got on board leaving their parents on the harbor or the children were left behind as their parents got pushed forward by the throng.’

“A former cruise liner designed to accommodate two thousand passengers and crew, by the time the Gustloff cast ropes on January 30, the beautiful white ship had taken on as many as six thousand refugees. Even so, as she backed away from port, her path was blocked by smaller craft jammed with people.

“‘Take us with you,’ the refugees cried. ‘Save the children!’

“‘We put down nets and everybody on the small ships scrambled up as best they could,’ said the Gustloff ’s radio operator, Rudi Lange.

“‘As we got under way I think I remember being told by one of the ship’s officers to send a signal that another 2,000 people had come aboard…’”[30]

“When rescue ships later reached the scene, they pulled from the icy waters a mere nine hundred survivors. All else—roughly 7,000 men, women and children—were lost.

“Even then, however, the nightmare did not end. When rescue vessels touched land, scores of victims were disembarked at Gotenhafen.

“Thus, in less than twenty-four hours, after a harrowing night of incredible terror, some refugees found themselves on the very docks they had hoped to leave, once again searching desperately for a way to escape.”[31]


 roosevelWe must never forget that the leaders of the Allied Forces—Joseph Stalin, Franklin Roosevelt, and Winston Churchill—are largely responsible for what happened to the German civilians during that time. As Goodrich rightly puts it,

“Despite the obvious dissimilarities of the men, intellectual as well as physical, each shared a characteristic with the other that shrank into insignificance all outer contradictions—all three harbored an inveterate hatred of not only Adolf Hitler and Nazism, but Germans and Germany.”[32]

Churchill was probably the most dishonest of them all precisely because he wrote in 1920 that the Bolshevik Revolution sought to bring down Western civilization.[33] He even wrote specifically that

“It is sheer humbug to pretend that it [Bolshevism] is not far worse than German militarism.”[34]

Churchill unambiguously moved on to declare,

“Bolshevism is not a policy, it is a disease…civilization is being completely extinguished over gigantic areas while Bolsheviks hop and caper like troops of ferocious baboons aid the ruins of cities and the corpses of their victims. I will not submit to be beaten by the baboons.”[35]

England, Churchill added, needed to fight “against the foul baboonery of Bolshevism.” Moreover, those who supported Bolshevism were “typhus-bearing vermin.”[36]

But Churchill ended forging a dubious alliance with the very diabolical force which sought to bring down Western civilization. So, was Churchill a “typhus-bearing vermin” for making an alliance with the greatest mass murderer (Stalin) in the history of warfare?

As Christ declared, one way to test whether a tree is good or bad is by looking at its fruit. You simply cannot say that an orange tree is good if it keeps producing rotten oranges.

What, then, was the fruit of the fraudulent alliance with Stalin? Was it really good? Or did it bring misery to the Germans who, according to Churchill himself, were less culpable than the Bolsheviks? The answer is yes.

Churchill, then, proved that you cannot be a flaming Zionist without living in the state of confusion and contradiction. He was like a squirrel that cannot decide to go right or left. Historian Ralph Raico himself points out that “Churchill never had a principle he did not in the end betray”[37] and was known as an “opportunist.”[38] Raico continues,

“He had twice changed his party affiliation—from Conservative to Liberal, and then back again…

“As head of the Board of Trade before World War I, he opposed increased armaments; after he became First Lord of the Admiralty in 1911, he pushed for bigger and bigger budgets, spreading wild rumors of the growing strength of the German navy, just as he did in the 1930s about the buildup of the German Air Force.

“He attacked socialism before and after World War I, while during the War he promoted war socialism, calling for nationalization of the railroads, and declaring in a speech: ‘Our whole nation must be organized, must be socialized if you like the word…

“He was an early and fervent opponent of Bolshevism. For years, he—very correctly—decried the ‘bloody baboons’ and ‘foul murderers of Moscow.’

“In an Italy teetering on the brink of Leninist revolution, II Duce had discovered the one formula that could counteract the Leninist appeal: hypernationalism with a social slant.

“Churchill lauded ‘Fascimo’s triumphant struggle against the bestial appetites and passions of Leninism,’ claiming that ‘it proved the necessary antidote to the Communist poision.’

“Yet the time came when Churchill made his peace with Communism. In 1941, he gave unconditional support to Stalin, welcomed him as an ally, embraced him as a friend…He repeatedly announced, of Stalin: ‘I like that man.’

Ilya Ehrenberg

Ilya Ehrenberg

“Obsessed not only with defeating Hitler, but with destroying Germany, Churchill was oblivious to the danger of a Soviet inundation of Europe until it was far too late.

“The symbolic climax of his infatuation came at the November, 1943, Teheran conference, when Churchill presented Stalin with a Crusader’s sword.”[39]

Yet as he began to see that the destruction of Dresden was a lot worse than he could ever have imagined, the same Churchill began to distance himself from his own ideological/Zionist notion. He wrote,

“It seems to me that the moment has come when the question of bombing of German cities simply for the sake of increasing the terror, though under other pretexts, should be reviewed.

“The destruction of Dresden remains a serious query against the conduct of Allied bombing. . . . I feel the need for more precise concentration upon military objectives . . . rather than on mere acts of terror and wanton destruction.”[40]

In nutshell, Churchill was politically a Zionist puppet who ended up prostrating before the Dreadful Few. In return, they reciprocally gave him virtually political and lucrative leverage.

“Churchill had been a strong Zionist practically from the start, holding that Zionism would deflect European Jews from social revolution to partnership with European imperialism in the Arab world.

“Now, in 1936, he forged links with the informal London pressure group known as The Focus, whose purpose was to open the eyes of the British public to the one great meanace, Nazi Germany.

“‘The great bulk of its finance came from Jewish businessmen such as Sir Robert Mond (a director of several chemical firms) and Sir Robert Waley-Cohn, the managing director of Shell, the latter contributing 50,000 [pounds].”[41]

Churchill, Raico writes,

“exaggerated the extent of German rearmament, formidable as it was, and distorted its purpose by harping on German production of heavy bombers.

“This was never a German priority, and Churchill’s fabrications were meant to demonstrate a German design to attack Britain, which was never Hitler’s intention until after the war began.”[42]


 In America, Roosevelt was working night and day to convince the American people that a war against Germany was in the interest of the United States. He declared privately,

“I would like to see the Germans on the breadline for fifty years.”[43]

When the Japanese finally attacked the U.S. in 1941—and Roosevelt and top military and policy advisors knew that the attack would happen[44]—Roosevelt’s dream actually came true: America must get involved in World War II.

Robert S. Stinnett, who went to World War II as a naval photographer and who later found out that Roosevelt had deceived the American people, declared that

“The decision he [Roosevelt] made, in concert with his advisors, was to provoke Japan through a series of actions into an overt act: the Pearl Harbor attack.”[45]

When the dust finally was settled, the holy trinity—Stalin, Churchill, and Roosevelt—was covertly planning to destroy Germany and reduce the whole country to ashes. But Stalin had to pretend that he was only fighting against war criminals:

“Lest anyone doubt Stalin’s intentions once his legions gained control in Germany, the reality was made crystal clear at the Teheran Conference in 1943.

“Lifting his glass of vodka for the ‘umpteenth toast,” the communist leader suddenly announced, ‘I propose a salute to the swiftest possible justice for all of Germany’s war criminals—justice before a firing squad.

“‘I drink to our unity in dispatching them as fast as we capture them, all of them, and there must be at least 50,000 of them.’

“When Churchill, well into his cups, angrily protested—‘The British people will never stand for such mass murder. . . . without a proper trial!’—Stalin smiled, his eyes twinkled and overall he seemed ‘hugely tickled.’

“‘Perhaps,’ the American president interrupted, ‘we could say that instead of summarily executing 50,000 we should settle on a smaller number. Shall we say 49,500?’”[46]

Why must there be at least 50,000 of them? Wasn’t Stalin presupposing that those prisoners of war were all guilty?

But the sad part was that both Roosevelt and Churchill later called Stalin “Uncle Joe”[47] and then added,

“He is a man who combines a tremendous, relentless determination with a stalwart good humor.

“I believe he is representative of the heart and soul of Russia; and I believe that we are going to get along very well with him and the Russian people—very well indeed.”[48]


 The next time you meet a screaming propagandist from the Holocaust establishment, ask him about the German Holocaust—most specifically the German civilians.  (I had a private interaction with Michael Shermer a few years ago and I certainly was surprised to see that the man breaths and lives in contradictions.[49])

Daniel Greenfield

Daniel Greenfield

The same historical machination is happening in France as well. Catherine Monfajon, author of a documentary, lamented,

“That silence is amazing and amazed me. France was the third country most bombed by the Allies after Germany and Japan and it is hardly mentioned in our history books.”[50]

If the propagandist still wants specific examples, ask him what Ilya Ehrenburg meant when he knew very well that German civilians had been raped by the thousands. Ehrenburg unambiguously said:

“The Germans have been punished, but not enough, The Fritzes are still running, but not lying dead.Who can stop us now? . . . The Oder? The Volksturm?

“No, it’s too late Germany, you can whirl around in circles, and burn, and howl in your deathly agony; the hour of revenge has struck!”[51]

Ehrenburg, by the way, was just implementing what Stalin had previously done to the peasants in 1932 and 1933.

So, whenever representatives of the Holocaust establishment start meowing day and night, you can simply ignore them, since no one has yet to douse them with a bucket of water.

For example, listen to how Jewish ideologue Daniel Greenfield indirectly defended what happened after World War II:

“By the time World War II was over entire cities had been devastated and hundreds of thousands of civilians had been killed by the Allies in one of the last wars whose virtue we were all able to agree on….

“To the professional pacifist these numbers appear to disprove the morality of war, any war, but they were the blood price that had to be paid to stop two war machines once they had been allowed to seize the strategic high ground.

“There was no other way to stop the genocide that Germany and Japan had been inflicting on Europe and Asia except through a way of war that would kill countless civilians.

“A refusal to fight that war would not have been the moral course. It would have meant that the Allies would have continued to serve as the silent partners in genocide. The same thing is true today.”[52]

Greenfield moves on to say:

“War is ugly. It is made moral by why it is fought, not by how it is fought.  If we are fighting a war to prevent mass murder, our moral obligation is to win it as quickly as possible. Not as cleanly.”[53]

Isn’t this man implicitly making a case for Hitler? Wasn’t the Third Reich primarily targeting Jewish Bolshevism, which was literally liquidating Russian peasants by the millions? Hitler also said in Mein Kampf that

“the part which the Jews played in the social phenomenon of prostitution, and more especially in the white slavery traffic, could be studied here better than any other West-European city, with the possible exception of certain ports of Southern France…

“A cold shiver ran down my spine when I first ascertained that it was the same coldblooded, thick-skinned and shameless Jew who showed his consummate skill in conducting that revolting exploitation of the dregs of the big city. Then I became fired with wrath.”[54]

Whether you agree or disagree with Hitler’s ideological move in order to solve the “Jewish question,” the fact is that prostitution and white slavery were in the guiding hands of the Dreadful Few.

If you doubt this, just pick up a copy of Prostitution and Prejudice: The Jewish Fight Against White Slavery, 1870-1939 by Jewish historian Edward J. Bristow.

Upon reading just the first page, you will quickly find out that the prostitution business ranged from “almost all parts of North and South Africa, to India, China, Japan, Philippine Islands, North and South America, and also to many of the countries of Europe” where “Yiddish speaking Jews are maintaining a regular flow of Jewesses, trafficked solely for the purpose of prostitution.”[55]

This was the case in virtually all the major countries in all the continents.

Hitler’s anger began to escalate after World War I when he saw what was happening in the press and theatre in Germany, when art in general was being used to denigrate the German culture.

What perhaps moved Hitler’s anger to a new height was that the Jews were less than three percent of the population, yet they largely controlled the theatre and were promoting what he would call “filth” and “pornography.”[56] For Hitler, these acts “must have been definitely intentional.”[57]

If Hitler was wrong then for saying this, David Cronenberg proved him right. Cronenberg himself declared that his art—and that is pornography—is

“subversive in some way. And that means that you cannot possibly abide by this sort of the rules of politeness and decorum that many mainstream movies thrive on…

“Real art must be subversive of the status quo to some extent. It doesn’t mean that you are preaching political revolution necessarily—although that would be a possibility.

“It’s inevitable, then, that if you consider yourself an artist, you are going to bother people, that you are going to disturb people and that you are going to knock over a few walls…

“There is an urge to get under the surface of things. Sometimes I do that literally….That does upset a lot of people. And it’s an inevitable consequence of being a serious artist.”[58]

As we have documented in previous articles and as other writers have pointed, the Weimar Republic proved that at least Hitler had a point. The only way that the Dreadful Few could have proved him wrong was to stay away from polluting the culture and from immersing themselves into Bolshevik ideology.

Lastly, Hitler did not show his “wrath” toward all Jews, as there were thousands upon thousands of people of Jewish descent in Nazi Germany. But once Hitler began to realize that the Jewish question ran deep, he declared,

“I had now no more hesitation about bringing the Jewish problem to light in all its details. No. Henceforth I was determined to do so.”[59]

For Hitler, Communism, Marxism, and Bolshevism, which were clearly Jewish movements both in Germany and elsewhere, were destroying Germany; therefore those who espoused such views must be dealt with.

Hitler was not the only one to agree about this. Europe was scared to death of Bolshevism and Communism, and Nazi Germany was largely a reaction to Jewish subversive movements.

In short, no Jewish subversive movements—no Nazi Germany. But the Dreadful Few certainly do not want to look at history from that angle precisely because they do not want to take any responsibility whatsoever. For them, Nazi Germany was about destroying all Jews in Europe. End of story.


 

[1] Thomas Goodrich, Hellstorm: The Death of Nazi Germany, 1944-1947 (Sheridan, CO: Aberdeen Books, 2010), 79.

[2] Goodrich, Hellstorm, 155.

[3] Ibid., 79-80.

[4] Ibid., 156.

[5] Ibid.

[6] Ibid., 158-159.

[7] Ibid., 159.

[8] Ibid., 158.

[9] Ibid., 84.

[10] Ibid., 92.

[11] Ibid., 93.

[12] Ibid., 84.

[13] Ibid., 81.

[14] Ibid., 83.

[15] See for example Giles, After the Reich.

[16] Goodrich, Hellstorm, 158.

[17] Ibid., 147, 148..

[18] Ibid., 148.

[19] See for example Norman A. Naimark, The Russians in Germany: A History of Soviet Zone of Occupation, 1945-1949 (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1997).

[20] Goodrich, Hellstorm, 83.

[21] Ibid.

[22] Goodrich, Hellstorm, 149.

[23] Ibid.

[24] Ibid.

[25] Ibid., 154.

[26] For other historical accounts on  similar topics, see R. M. Douglas, Orderly and Humane: The Expulsion of the Germans after the Second World War (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2012); Giles MacDonogh, After the Reich: The Brutal History of the Allied Occupation (New York: Basic Books, 2007); Alfred-Maurice de Zayas, A Terrible Revenge: The Ethnic Cleansing of the East European Germans (New York: Palgrave, 2006); James Bacques, Crimes and Mercies: The Fate of German Civilians Under Allied Occupation, 1944-1950 (Vancouver: Talonbooks, 2007); Keith Lowe, Inferno: The Fiery Destruction of Hamburg, 1943 (New York: Scribner, 2007).

[27] Goodrich, Hellstorm, 6.

[28] Ibid.

[29] Ibid.

[30] Ibid., 88-89.

[31] Ibid., 91.

[32] Ibid., 96.

[33] Winston Churchill, “Zionism vs. Bolshevism: A Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People,” Illustrated Sunday Herald, February 8, 1920.

[34] Quoted in Giles Milton, Russian Roulette: A Deadly Game—How British Spies Thwarted Lenin’s Global Plot (London: Hodder & Stoughton, 2013), 243.

[35] Ibid.

[36] Ibid.

[37] Ralph Raico, Great Wars & Great Leaders (Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute, 2010), 54.

[38] Ibid., 55.

[39] Ibid., 56-57.

[40] Goodrich, Hellstorm, 124-125.

[41] Ibid., 70.

[42] Ibid., 71.

[43] Goodrich, Hellstorm, 96.

[44] See for example Robert S. Stinnett, Day of Deceit: The Truth About FDR and Pearl Harbor (New York: The Free Press, 2000).

[45] Ibid., xiii.

[46] Goodrich, Hellstorm, 98.

[47] See Raico, Great Wars and Great Leadres.

[48] Ibid., 99.

[49] John Laurenson, “D-Day Anniversary: France’s Forgotten Blitz,” BBC, June 4, 2014.

[50] Ibid.

[51]Goodrich, Hellstorm, 94.

[52] Daniel Greenfield, “You Can’t Stop Genocide Without Killing Civilians,” FrontPageMag.com, October 13, 2014.

[53] Ibid.

[54] Hitler, Mein Kampf, 43.

[55] Edward J. Bristow, Prostitution and Prejudice: The Jewish Fight Against White Slavery1870-1939 (New York: Schocken Books, 1983), 1.

[56] Hitler, Mein Kampf, 42-43.

[57] Ibid., 43.

[58] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BUdyX71jFYA.

[59] Hitler, Mein Kampf, 43.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Related Posts:



The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT, VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians, or the Veterans Today Network and its assigns. LEGAL NOTICE - COMMENT POLICY

Posted by on October 15, 2014, With 139417 Reads Filed under History, Life. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

FaceBook Comments

72 Responses to "Rape and Sex in German Cities After World War II Revisited (Part II)"

  1. robert.x.michaels  November 10, 2016 at 8:33 am

    As horrible as this real history is, there is or has been an even more horrific plan being hatched against the surviving German nation right now, please read this carefully and if possible, prayerfully! – http://www.infiniteunknown.net/2016/09/29/whistleblower-official-agenda-for-the-destruction-of-germany-offizielle-agenda-zur-zerstorung-deutschlands/

    – and then spread the warning as far and wide as possible!!

  2. Preston James, Ph.D  October 16, 2014 at 4:51 pm

    A very well written, well documented article that lays bare the Babylonian Talmudic virus which Bolsheviks as a people carry. Folks, the NeoBolsheviks who nuclear Blackmailed the USG into allowing them to consolidate all American Alphabet, Intel and Law Enforcement are the same families of these Bolshevik subhuman scum. They exhibit the same barbarism and hatred of American Goyim that was tyaken out on the German Women and children. And this did not start with WW2, it started in 1917 when the demons of Babylonian Talmudism was unleashed in Russia, all paid for by the City of London and Wall street Banksters.

    • Preston James, Ph.D  October 16, 2014 at 5:04 pm

      Note that these same families have hijacked America and now have their own internal occupying police state army inside America, Homeland Security (DHS) run at the top by NeoBolshevik monsters who are planning to mass-murder as many American Goyim as they can get aware with.

      These soulless scum must be brought to justice, Can you say Treason, Sedition. Yes, DHS, AIPAC, ADL, SPLC, Bnai Brith are all part of the same neoBolshevik bunch of enemies of the state who are here to asset strip America, dirty it up by stoking the flesh and spreading pornography and filth and then mass-murdering 90% of Americans.They want to take Americans to camps, isolate our women and rape and murder them because they have the disease called Babylonian Talmudism (BT virus). Are they the children of Cain, Kenites? You decide, but they do want to destroy our society, destroy our nation, asset strip us of all our wealth and property and fruit of our labors and then mass-murder us just like the Bolsheviks did to the 100 Million Russians, beginning in 1917.

      DHS must be completely destroyed, top officials arrested for espionage, treason and Sedition, tried, convicted and hung if found guilty. TSA must be destroyed too. Any honest DHS agents or workers with no history of the BT virus or espionage against America can be reassigned to the agencies they came from and those agencies made independent.

    • psyops  October 17, 2014 at 5:32 pm

      “There is much in the fact of Bolshevism itself, in the fact that so many Jews are
      Bolshevists. The ideals of Bolshevism are consonant with many of the highest ideals
      of Judaism.”

      – Jewish Chronicle, London April, 4, 1919

  3. Charlotte NC Bill  October 16, 2014 at 3:27 pm

    When Churchill saw the Lusitania he was heard to say, ” to me it’s just 75 tons of live bait.”

  4. Chandler  October 16, 2014 at 12:35 pm

    After surviving this story, I don’t think any comment from me will add anything. My uncle who served in Germany always refused to talk about what he experienced. He hated it all, and drank himself to death. I never understood. If any of this was his tormentor I now understand. I hope this author is okay after his work on this. My God Jonas!!

    • Charlotte NC Bill  October 16, 2014 at 3:18 pm

      If I could do it all over again I would use my “right of return” and reverse emigrate. These Germans need German-Americans to do just that. With their love of free speech they would really change things.

  5. coffeelover  October 16, 2014 at 12:29 pm

    “German phobia” is the word that comes to my mind. The Germans were feared by most of her neighbors in Europe’s long history. General George Patton once wrote, after serving as the commander of the Allied Forces in Germany, that the Germans were by far the finest people he had ever come to know. Everything good about Germany, including her finest culture and brilliant intellectual history, got dumped after WWII under the name of “Nazi” or any connection thereof. I believe many of our VT readers here know why that happened (or had to happen).

  6. wiggins  October 16, 2014 at 11:54 am

    Quite honestly Jonas.. I thought I had read most things, but the heinous goings on in Goodrich’s book, was beyond the realms of humanity……I couldn’t finish it.

  7. Topmember  October 16, 2014 at 11:28 am

    About rape by Soviet military – have been some cases, but for them were shot on Stalin’s orders, according to which the civilian population of Germany was forbidden to touch. That’s all from mythology and propaganda, which are engaged in the West for many decades. “Goebbels dead, but his cause lives” …

    Rape in Germany engaged the British, Americans, and the highest number of rapes were by the Moroccan military – did it mentioned in this book?

    Allies destroyed several German cities by aerial bombardment – there is generally no one should have to rape – they simply buried under the ruins. Soviet troops destroy no one German city under the orders of Stalin, in which he ordered to preserve the architecture of German cities.

  8. Chris Houston  October 16, 2014 at 7:23 am

    Horrific but not surprising from the Synagogue of Satan.
    God help us…

  9. ArmenianChristian  October 16, 2014 at 6:09 am

    The germans are a great people…
    Nazi’s not so much but at least nationalistic in nature..
    Unlike zionism which is parasitic like a vampire sucking the life out of everything…

  10. Amarka  October 16, 2014 at 2:48 am

    http //www.nationalchurchillmuseum.org/wit-wisdom-quotes.html

    “History will be kind to me for I intend to write it.”

    “I am ready to meet my Maker. Whether my Maker is prepared for the great ordeal of meeting me is another matter.” November 30, 1949, in response to a reporter who asked if he had any fear of death.

    “All I can say is that I have taken more out of alcohol than alcohol has taken out of me.” At reception in Washington D.C., World War II

    “Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing ever happened.”

    • wiggins  October 16, 2014 at 11:58 am

      A fraudster and a Zionist lackey. Read the David Irving Diaries…..or this.

      https //www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Db_5F7uxt4

  11. Amarka  October 16, 2014 at 2:17 am

    Early on the 3rd day he will rise again – one day is as a 1.000 years – Bible.

    Jer 51 34 “He has swallowed us like a jackal..” Strongs Hebrew concordance 8577 indicates that it is not a jackal but a large snake,which reminds me of the symbolic snake in the protocols of zion. “The dragon of the Greeks” says Pausanius, was only a large snake – “The Two Babylons” page 226.
    .
    Jer.51 42 “The sea has come up over Babylon; she is covered with the multitude of its waves.” [In the Wizard of Oz the wicked witch of the west is “liquidated” by Dorothy throwing a bucket of water over her.]

    See
    Pillars on St. John the Divine Cathedral [ Jeremiah 51 42-44 ]
    http //vigilantcitizen.com/sinistersites/sinister-sites-st-john-the-divine-cathedral/

    http //c5c5c5.wordpress.com/tag/un-meddling-with-religion/
    .
    http //c5c5c5.wordpress.com/2010/09/23/the-un-meddling-with-religion-part-5/
    .
    http //www.nyc-architecture.com/HAR/HAR002.htm

    Jer.51 64 “Then you shall say, “Thus Babylon shall sink and not rise from the catastrophe that I will bring upon her. And they shall be weary.” Thus are the words of Jeremiah.
    .
    Revelation 18 21-24. “Then a mighty angel took up a stone like a great millstone and threw it into the sea, saying, “Thus with violence the great city Babylon [New York] shall be thrown down, and shall not be found anymore…….23 ……For your merchants were the great men of the earth, for by your sorcery all the nations were deceived…..24

  12. John Kirby  October 16, 2014 at 1:24 am

    Whose side was Hitler on?

    • Amarka  October 16, 2014 at 2:51 am

      From what I understand Hitler wanted England to join up with him to fight Jewish communism.

    • Old Jules  October 16, 2014 at 4:04 am

      Hitler’s side.

  13. Connie  October 16, 2014 at 1:24 am

    Thank you, Jonas, for this article and your previous ones on this topic, and for the book titles and authors you reference. These rapes and torturous murders, as horrific as they were, need to be exposed. The conspiracy of silence about this, including threats of criminal charges in some countries, compounds the crimes. I hope I will live to see the day a memorial monument is erected for these victims. There is a huge karma debt owed to Germany that will be and, I think, is being paid but there is much more coming for the good of Germany.

    • Amarka  October 16, 2014 at 2:34 am

      Eisenhower’s Death Camps
      The Last Dirty Secret of World War Two

      http //www.whale.to/b/bacque1.html

  14. Ann  October 15, 2014 at 9:48 pm

    That psychopathic skank Ilya Ehrenberg wrote the depraved “Kill” leaflet that goaded the Reds into committing atrocities. He was an absolute oxygen parasite, good for nothing but bloodlust.

    http //www.berlin-1945.com/horrors-of-war/ilya-ehrenberg-texts/

  15. cynthiamaccioli  October 15, 2014 at 1:41 pm

    I beg to differ Jules, but Germany won WW1 hands down. And it took the entire world to defeat them the 2nd time around. What does that tell you? Was Germany just plain evil like the Jew news said or were they just too great to be tolerated? Hitler did everything humanly possible to prevent war. Believe Hitler was a monster if you want to, makes no diff to me, but you are one kool-aid drinking, propagandized dude that knows little about WW11. You don’t even know the real reason Hitler went into Poland. You will never understand WW11 if you do not understand the reasons the US entered WW1, a war that was already won and over with.

    • Old Jules  October 16, 2014 at 4:13 am

      cynthiamaccioli I didn’t say he was a monster. I said the launched WWII by his attack on Poland. Deliberately. And I said, he lost.

      If you believe Germany “won WWI hands down” you either have a novel, unique view of history, or you’ve believed too much of the romantic fantasy you’ve obviously been exposed to somewhere.

      I have no investment in what you believe, however. No harm comes to anyone if you wish to believe Germany won WWI and Hitler was a saint.

    • Curmudgeon  October 16, 2014 at 1:36 pm

      Old Jules,
      You continue to repeat the lie. WWII did not start wit the German invasion of Poland. It started with the British declaration of war against Germany. There had been Polish border incursions into Germany on a number of occasions. German nationals were being slaughtered. Hitler had asked the League of Nations to intervene on a number of occasions, but was rebuffed.

      The “Hitler started WWII” lie is no different than the “Iraq started the war against Iran” lie. Iranians were shelling Iraqi border towns long before Iraq invaded. The same group propagates both lies.

    • Old Jules  October 17, 2014 at 6:53 am

      Curmudgeon you choose to put the emphasis on a version of history more sympathetic to Hitler than the one I happen to believe is nearer the truth. I appreciate your belief in the other version, but the fact you believe yours and I believe mine doesn’t assure either of us is actually right.

      You and I are harmless and our opinions can’t change history, nor whatever view anyone might take of it. We have no investment in the beliefs of the other.

      So ;you’ve stated your viewpoint, I’ve stated mine, and nobody’s the worse for the wear. The same will be true if re reiterate it, as I’ve been guilty of doing when the similar versions to the one you choose to believe are iterated.

      Neither of us has made a dent in the truth, whatever it might be.

    • Old Jules  October 17, 2014 at 6:59 am

      Toby certainly a case can be made that the war in Europe began with the elections of the early 1930s. Probably if the German people had voted differently in those elections the War in Europe wouldn’t have happened. But WWII was a big place and the Japanese Empire had a gleam in its eye that had nothing to do with Europe. WWII had to have Japan to make it a world war.

    • Charlotte NC Bill  October 16, 2014 at 3:26 pm

      She’s right. WW I would have been over if the US hadn’t jumped in. The US jumped in because world Jewry used it’s influence over America. In exchange for that effort England issued the Balfour Declaration. Promising land that wasn’t theirs to another people ( Khazar European “Jews” ) who had no connection , and no right to, that land. Hitler was no saint. He did try to make peace with England to concentrate on the Soviets. They could never cross the Channel much less the Atlantic. There were no death camps, they were work camps for suspected pro-Soviets. The Jew-run gulags in the USSR? THEY were death camps.

    • Old Jules  October 17, 2014 at 7:04 am

      Bill, WWI might have never ended if the US hadn’t jumped in. I know a thousand theories have been put forward for why the US did jump in, including the one you cling to. As for the death camps, everyone had them including the Germans. Hell the French had a batch of them in the Carib and on the South Amercan coast of what? Guinea? Devils Island was the one for political prisoners, and the real death camps were for French felons. Similar to the British death camps for their felons in Australia back in the day.

      Soviets and Germans both had them, but they didn’t invent the idea.

    • Ann  October 17, 2014 at 5:13 pm

      Old Jules, the WW1 reply posters are correct. Germany won decisively by 1916. That’s why we had to enter–the Germans almost ruined the party by proposing a peace treaty. Not one shot was fired on German soil all that time. Furthermore the war was planned by central bankers in the 1890’s to take down the four Empires. Did you know that the traitor William Wiseman was head of British Intelligence, and the traitor Max Warburg was head of German Intelligence, and they were friends all along? And Max’s brother Paul wrote the charter for the Fed? That the IRS was hatched at the same time to rip us off for the Fed slush fund?

      The whole thing was a depraved hoax. Did you know that America sent soldiers to Russia after the filthy Bolshevik Revolution? Look up AEF–American Expeditionary Forces. Did you know that Trotsky lived in New York for almost two years and that the Federal Parasite Reserve gave him $20 million for murder and mayhem in Russia? This is the wrong place to push standard NWO pseudo history books.

    • paul becke  November 21, 2016 at 10:56 am

      Cynthia, Hitler actually applauded barbarism, claiming that it purified a nation! He stands condemned by his own mouth. Unequivocally, whatever the depravity of his enemies. This whole article is a well-justified expression of incandescent outrage at the barbarism of the Russians and the rest of the Allies, so any blandishment concerning Hitler’s satanic character is simply irrational. The ordinary German Joe and Jane, like the general public elsewhere, were caught between the devil and the deep.

    • paul becke  November 21, 2016 at 11:01 am

      (continued)
      The real villains were we, Brits, who depending on the parasitism of empire, found the Germans were knocking spots off us industrially, and with the prospect of them making an economic trade pact with Russia, engineered WWI. And we know that that led to that most punitive and unjust Treaty of Versailles, and WWII, as Lloyd-George and others had predicted.

      Stalin’s psychopathy would have been so extreme and blind as to be comical, were it not for the ocean of immense pain and misery he inflicted on millions, friend; and foe, alike, in his paranoia. However, Stalin was a master-bureaucrat, while it was precisely the lack of this capacity – despite the contribution of
      Albert Speer, that was the despair of Hitler’s generals, and contributed massively to Germany’s defeat.

      Nevertheless, even had Germany conquered Russia initially, the distances between the population centres are too vast for them or any other country to control against a resolutely hostile population. The Nazis barbarism actually ensured that the Russians would fight them to the death.

  16. Enrico  October 15, 2014 at 12:19 pm

    google jewish canabalism. the truth is beyond hollywood’s imagination

    • Old Jules  October 16, 2014 at 4:13 am

      The truth obviously isn’t enough to satisfy the inquiring mind.

    • Jack Martin  October 16, 2014 at 10:38 pm

      The truth is quite enough to satisfy the inquiring mind… but it will never satisfy the mind that is already made up before the evidence is even considered… or even with utter disregard of the evidence.

      H. L. Mencken said, “The believing mind is externally impervious to evidence. The most that can be accomplished with it is to induce it to substitute one delusion for another. It rejects all overt evidence as wicked…”

      That remark might have been addressed to you, Jules.

      Germany did not start WW-I… Britain did… and they most certainly would have lost that war had America not come to their aid – even before our official entry into that war. Britain also started WW-II and would have lost that, too, had they not been bailed out by the Bolshevik butchers… and by America’s entry following the Pearl Harbor attack which was deliberately arranged by FDR for that very purpose.

    • Old Jules  October 17, 2014 at 7:15 am

      Mencken’s remark was directed to all of us, Jack. Most of what we believe in this life or think we know came from sources who got it from other sources who got it from ad infinitum. When people carry evangelism, crusades, strong biases into the process they begin cherry picking facts to build cases to support what they already decided to believe.

      For this reason if we’re responsible people we should be plagued by constant self-doubt. Especially when we begin really really really believing so much it comes as upper case letters in our minds.

      I work hard at culling upper case letters from my beliefs and I mistrust anyone who doesn’t.

    • cynthiamaccioli  October 20, 2014 at 10:10 am

      The truth satisfies my mind.

  17. Mopar21277  October 15, 2014 at 10:41 am

    I’m struggling to keep my lunch down, absolutely shocking, far worse actions than what the SS is accused of during the victories in Eastern Europe and Ukraine.

    Like Gordon has written, if Eisenhower hadn’t wasted so much time & US lives in Italy; we would have taken Germany & Poland in 1944 and none of this horror would have happened. Also no Iron Curtain B.S.

    • Old Jules  October 15, 2014 at 11:13 am

      Armchair quarterbacking Eisenhower and the invasion of the Italian peninsula? There was never any chance the allies would take Germany in 1944. The USSR was carrying the bulk of the war, taking all the casualties for defeating Germany. The smart money was on continuing to allow them to do it. And Germany didn’t need protecting from the Rooskies at the cost of British and American lives. If Hitler had wanted a Chinaman’s chance to avoid what happened he could have withdrawn the German armies to a defensible position and begun making serious attempts to surrender to the US or Britain.

      If there was any doubt in German minds that the Soviets would behave exactly as the Germans had done they were being pollyannaish.

      Germany might have gotten a better deal if the High Command had gutted up the balls to kill Hitler and surrender to the side best likely to be humane. [Because they hadn’t spent time under the German bootheel]

    • Amarka  October 16, 2014 at 2:30 am

      Eisenhower’s Death Camps
      The Last Dirty Secret of World War Two

      http //www.whale.to/b/bacque1.html

    • Old Jules  October 16, 2014 at 4:19 am

      Amarka I knew a couple of Germans who spent time in those ‘death camps’. One escaped and went to South America, the other was released. The camps were hard, really hard, but they weren’t ‘death’ camps by any description. A person can believe anything he reads or sees on YouTube however, and it’s no harm if he believes if, believe anything you find on the Internet. Truth doesn’t require any of us to believe it. No election is coming down the pike to decide what truth is.

    • Charlotte NC Bill  October 16, 2014 at 3:30 pm

      They were kept out in the elements w/o tents, facilities and very little food..Over a million died, I call that a death camp. But’s that’s OK, they weren’t POWs, they were Disarmed Enemy Combatants. Ike was a son of a bitch.

    • Jack Martin  October 16, 2014 at 10:48 pm

      When Eisenhower was informed that his treatment of German POWs in those camps was in violation of the Geneva Convention, he simply redesignated their status from “prisoner of war” to “disarmed enemy forces” and declared that, as such, they were not entitled to the protection of the Geneva Convention rules.

    • cynthiamaccioli  October 20, 2014 at 9:55 am

      Why would Hitler surrender to any country when he was right all along? He was the ONLY leader of a nation who, how did you put it, gutted up the balls, to empty his country of the degenerate filth that pervaded. To give to his people what they deserved after decades of unbelievable suffering. When we had a president who tried to do the same he had his brains splattered in his wife’s lap.
      And speaking of cherry picking, it must be nice for you to do the same, taking tidbits here and there to come to your own version of history rather than believe verifiable evidence to the contrary.

  18. Mulegino  October 15, 2014 at 10:40 am

    Aside for purposes of guilt mongering and monetary extortion, one other reason that the false Holocaust narrative continues to be force fed to the people of Europe and America is that it serves as an instrument of deflection against the far greater crimes committed by the Allies.

    The Shoah legend has now become the cornerstone of that other Sorelian myth of the “Good War” as Greenfield, the incorrigible tribalist, points out above.

    There was no positive upshot to the outcome of the Second World War. There was nothing virtuous about the Allied cause. The war in Europe was instigated and fought for the purpose of destroying Germany. Europe was virtually destroyed to make the world safe for globalization, corporate hegemony, “free trade”, the imposition of wage slavery and an ugly, soulless anticulture of swinishness and corruption across the globe.

    • Old Jules  October 15, 2014 at 11:18 am

      Strange then, that Germany chose to begin that war by invading Poland.

      Cooperating with Germany in destroying itself instead of allowing it to invade and conquer Europe was definitely a positive result of WWII, when non-Germans weigh the matter.

    • Mulegino  October 15, 2014 at 11:35 am

      Germany’s invasion of Poland did not occur in a vacuum. Hitler’s policy with regards to the Danzig question was initially more moderate than his Weimar predecessors; he made a non-aggression pact with Marshall Pilsudski in 1934.

      The real culprits in the matter were the British war party (Churchill, Duff Cooper, Lord Vanistaart, Anthony Eden, et al) and the FDR administration and its warmongering ambassador at large, William Bullitt. They were the primary actors in turning Poland against Germany, by offering the chauvinistic and vainglorious Poles a guarantee of military assistance (which they knew they could not honor) should Poland go to war against Germany.

      Hitler’s proposal to Poland- the return of Danzig to the Reich, a transportation corridor through the corridor (over which Poland would retain sovereignty) connecting Germany to East Prussia, a guarantee of Polish rights in Danzig, as well as the Poles being given the Port of Gdynia-were extremely reasonable. Danzig was not a Polish city, but was a free city under trusteeship of the League of Nations whose population was 95% ethnic German.

      Polish bellicosity and chauvinism, combined with Anglo-American (and of course, Jewish) intrigue and warmongering were the primary factors in turning what should have been a mere border dispute into the Second World War.

    • Old Jules  October 15, 2014 at 11:51 am

      However a person rationalizes it, Hitler attacked Poland and ended it with the destruction and splitting of Germany. Blame it on anyone you wish, nobody made Hitler attack Poland.

      And in fact the French and British honored their mutual defense pact with Poland. Hitler didn’t think they would, but those war mongering French and British lived up to their promise and Hitler got his nose ground into the dirt and carried Germany with him.

      Poland didn’t attack Germany and there’s no way any Hitler apologist on earth can build case otherwise.

      Hitler attacked Poland, built a war and lost it.

    • Mulegino  October 15, 2014 at 2:38 pm

      Germany only attacked Poland after a series of provocations and threats

      Poland ordered general mobilization against Germany before Germany did so against Poland.

      Polish armed forces regularly violated the sovereignty of Danzig, including occupying the Westerplattz.

      Polish anti-aircraft batteries fired on civilian Lufthansa aircraft flying between Germany and East Prussia.

      Threats by the Polish general staff to crush Germany and redraw the Polish border to the west of Berlin.

      Massacres of ethnic Germans by Polish “patriotic” mobs.

      Numerous cross border incursions by Polish “irregulars” against German border and customs posts, etc.

      Britain and France did not honor their commitment to come to Poland’s defense at all. Not one single British or French soldier touched Polish soil. Not a single British or French ship attempted to defend Danzig. The USSR’s subsequent invasion of Eastern Poland was ignored. The only significant British action of the war with regards to Poland was Churchill’s betrayal of it at Yalta.

      It is clear that Poland was the sacrificial lamb that was to be sacrificed in order to start a war with Germany, the stated goal of the British war party, FDR, and international Jewry.

    • clausdoehring  October 15, 2014 at 10:26 pm

      Old Jules, I know you do not have a good reputation as a commenter on VT , what is understandable, because many of your comments, and there are many, lacking of serious knowledge.That is the reason I do not take your comments seriously for to give a comment to them.But this one is in my mind somehow so disgusting that I have to reply to it. Poland was established after WW I by annexation of circa 50 % of Russian and German territory each. The family I come from and all the relatives were Germans, who lived in this former part of Germany. My parents left this country in 1919 , because the did not want to be forced to become of Polish nationality. In 1938 several of our relatives were bestial murdered by the Poles, In a similar way, as you can read in this article, it happened to 60 to 70 000 other Germans still living in this country. In April 1939 the Polish army made mobile against German and one could see all over the country signs, showing Polish soldiers in attack position underwritten with MARCH to BERLIN. Till the beginning of the war Poland raided German houses and farms close to the border and set them on fire. So I may conclude, if somebody does not know anything except he has bad dreams, he should better keep his mouth shut before committing offences. Your comments belong under this rubric.

    • Old Jules  October 16, 2014 at 6:33 am

      Mulegino the decision to attack Poland was a lousy one against the advice of his military high command. Their memoirs and diaries universally condemned the move as catastrophic.

    • Curmudgeon  October 16, 2014 at 1:57 pm

      Old Jules
      How did the French and British honour their mutual defense pact with Poland? When the Polish Ambassador complained to Churchill about the Russian invasion, the response was basically ‘piss off’.
      Poland, in fact, did attack Germany, just as Poland invaded Czechoslovakia before Germany did.
      No one speaks of the German invasion(s) being only to the pre-WWI borders to the East. The carving up of Germany at Versailles had no basis in international law.

      Hitler is portrayed as evil because he was messing with the parasitic international bankers. All the rest is window dressing.

    • Charlotte NC Bill  October 16, 2014 at 3:33 pm

      When the Poles took part of Czechoslovakia that was OK..When the Soviets took part of Poland that was OK. When Germany pushed the Soviets back? That was the end of the world.

    • clausdoehring  October 15, 2014 at 11:38 pm

      Mulegino, well said, right on the point.

    • Old Jules  October 16, 2014 at 6:18 am

      clausdoehring VT’s not a place you need to take seriously. It’s just a website [initially for veterans, I surmise] where columnists put forward varying degrees of truth as they percieve it. Afterward commenters with varying degrees of knowledge, wisdom and understanding, remark on what they’ve read, both in the comments and in the articles.

      The fact you are probably a person with strong biases and limited ability to know the truth of history stands you in good stead here, as it does me, as well. Along with the others who write columns and comment here.

      Presumably some of us come here to find fragments we can convince ourselves is ‘truth’. Or we come here to expose ourselves to unfamiliar ideas and concepts.

      But some come to simply reinforce dearly held biases by reading others repeating them.

      You and I are among one or all of those groups. We’ve nothing invested in one another.

    • moneytalks  October 16, 2014 at 10:40 pm

      “” VT’s not a place you need to take seriously. “”

      G. Duff admits there is plenty of bs here at VT. However , many of us know that VT articles and comments both have much truth that you cannot find anywhere else . Seriously OJ . . . not a need just a good idea .

    • Mulegino  October 16, 2014 at 8:37 am

      Thanks, Claus.

      Very rarely do we hear about the Polish attacks on ethnic minorities (especially Germans), or the bellicosity of the Polish government.

      I wonder how many people have heard of the Bromberg Massacre.

    • coffeelover  October 16, 2014 at 12:09 pm

      @ Mulegino

      All wars have been planned (or designed if you will). American General George Patton also said essentially the same thing as you said about the impact of WWII on Germany.

      If I can add my two cents, I believe the primary goal of WWII was to eliminate and wipe out the powerful royal dynasties and kingdoms in Europe and replace them with a stupid system of “democracy.” Why? People-led (or sheeple-led if you will) “democracy” can easily be controlled or infiltrated using the money power of the corporate world, whereas kingdoms are not so controlled in the same way. History readily proves it.

    • Mulegino  October 16, 2014 at 1:39 pm

      You are entirely correct. The decolonisation of the European empires after the war has resulted in an ongoing humanitarian catastrophe of unimaginable proportions, and it’s going to get worse.
      Europe is now overrun by hordes from the Third World who identify “democracy” with pure entitlement; America has become an unprecedented global warmonger, and the Middle East a permanent bloodbath thanks to Israel, the U.S. and Great Britain.

      And, as you point out, the anti-authoritarian foreign policy of the victorious Allies merely led to the facade of “democracy” as a superficial form of mass manipulation, an instrument of globalization and the destruction of all traditional culture with the aim of creating a horde of despiritualized, deracinated and culturally lobotomized, fit only for wage slavery and consumption of artificial needs.

      A perfect symbol of post war “democracy” would be a barefoot, illiterate African youngster holding an AK-47 and an I-Phone, living in a mud hovel, with an empty bottle of Coca Cola on the table.

      This is the world the “Greatest Generation” has brought us.

    • ccrsedona  October 18, 2014 at 1:12 am

      Mulego, I have to say, you pegged it the best I’ve ever heard “And, as you point out, the anti-authoritarian foreign policy of the victorious Allies merely led to the facade of “democracy” as a superficial form of mass manipulation, an instrument of globalization and the destruction of all traditional culture with the aim of creating a horde of despiritualized, deracinated and culturally lobotomized, fit only for wage slavery and consumption of artificial needs.”

      “A perfect symbol of post war “democracy” would be a barefoot, illiterate African youngster holding an AK-47 and an I-Phone, living in a mud hovel, with an empty bottle of Coca Cola on the table.”

      “This is the world the “Greatest Generation” has brought us.”

    • Mulegino  October 18, 2014 at 2:22 pm

      Thanks, ccrsedona.

      As an American, it pains me to quote Thomas Jefferson, who wrote “I tremble for my country when I consider that God is just.”

    • moneytalks  October 16, 2014 at 11:15 pm

      Furthermore , history readily supports the notion that all wars are ultimately for putting Synagogue of Satan jews into rulership over the world since it was written in the jewish Old Testament that God presumably made them the tacitly self-proclaimed {[ divinely chosen ones ]} to have dominion over the world . You cannot rule the world unless you control the money supplies . The talmudic jew Rothschild created central banking system manifests the requisite monopoly controls of money technologies with their crown jewel achievement being the 1913 Federal Reserve System .

  19. mary  October 15, 2014 at 10:13 am

    this was very difficult to read.. even though I felt sick, I knew I had to finish this, in some small way to honor truth.. you could probably substitute any nationality in place of Russian in this article, as through our history this type of horror has occurred and continues . but what I never understand is the men who do it, never will I understand that.. What is it that makes a human turn into a beast? I understand your point, that history is erased, I get that. I see it all, but the fact remains that a man turns into a demented animal, and enjoys inflicting horror on women and children.. I guess there is noting left to say.

    • Old Jules  October 15, 2014 at 10:25 am

      It isn’t only weomen and children he enjoys doing it to. I agree you could substitute any army in the world including the German one in the territories it occupied. Some are a bit worse than others, mainly because of the scope of their imaginations and sometimes because they have been invaded by this particular people and they see themselves as giving a come-uppance. During the Russian war in Afghanistan not one USSR soldier captured returned from captivity. They were anally gang raped to death, skinned alive, tongues cut out, all sorts of imaginative ways to deal with a captive invader.

      I’d love to see the Israeli army defeated by anyone in that region, love to see the Palestinians get back what is legally theirs. But I expect if it ever happens it will be Israeli families getting as much mahem as they’ve delt to Palestinians since 1947, or worse. Couldn’t happen to more deserving folks.

      The videos show Israeli women and children beating hell out of Palestinian kids. Too bad we humans are what we are.

    • moneytalks  October 17, 2014 at 12:15 am

      “” the fact remains that a man turns into a demented animal, and enjoys inflicting horror on women and children..””

      Synagogue of Satan jews proved thousands of years ago with the biblical Amelkite genocide that mind control techniques , such as calling upon a god for commands , can turn ordinary men into predators — the essence of organized killing . You cannot defend or secure yourself from those human predators without becoming a predator ( ie. willing and able to kill them ) . The mind of man appears to be easily converted from the extremes of being angelic to becoming demonic given the corresponding circumstances which apparantly are always partially beyond human control .

  20. Old Jules  October 15, 2014 at 9:30 am

    Congratulations on a mostly factual, article. Bad way to end a war that started looking so goooood.

  21. LC  October 15, 2014 at 9:19 am

    thanks Mr. Alexis as always;;;

    Germany & Palestine have been very parallel in their demise in past 100+ years. Just that Palestine was never industrial & never armed so it couldn’t put up resistance since 1900 & it was too easy to loot & slaughter while Germany was much larger +++ industrialized +++ armed & equipped & trained… so they could fend off aggression at least a short while (twice)!!!

    Put this in YouTube;;; “germany palenstine parallels” & watch clips like these below;;;

    A Hollowcost

    ********www.youtube.com/watch?v=acXFlw9_Lco

    David Ice correctly calls this “ROTHSCHILD ZIONISM” because Herzel & ZIONISM ++ all cabals were all Rothschild babies.

    The Philosopy Of Zionism
    *****www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQBy8WGWwWs

    To the Jewish people who attended the recent “JEWISH HOLLY DAYS” & ate the special bread;;;

    Next time you visit your Synagogue ask your Rabbi if there was human blood mixed in the dough of that bread which he gave you to eat???
    If he hesitates to say NO then you know the answer. He made you into a cannibal without you knowing it!!!
    & its time to turn him for having murdered (probably a child) to indulge his own Satanic Dracula addiction to human blood!!!!
    -lc

    • Old Jules  October 15, 2014 at 9:49 am

      Germany and Palestine resemble one another not at all. Palestinians were never agressors, never attempted to steal land from resident Jews.

      The analogy is too big a stretch for any rational mind.

      Germany got itself into WWI and lost. Nobody forced it to fight and while the other parties were equally guilty, if Germany had insisted on peace and only fought a defensive war against all invaders WWI wouldn’t have happened and WWII probably wouldn’t have happened.

      Germany fought both lost both and enjoyed terrible consequences for having done so. The pride of German manhood was lost in those wars and Germans degenerated to being mere collaborators with Russians and Americans until the offspring of occupying Russians and Americans began to reach maturity.

      Today they’re probably trying to get in touch with their male selves.

    • LC  October 15, 2014 at 12:14 pm

      Jewles (or showed it be Jew-full???) ;;; Welcome to Veterans Today!!!

      Its good to see that Zio-Cannibals like JDL-ADL have dedicated full-time staff to combat VT!!!

    • Old Jules  October 15, 2014 at 12:21 pm

      Hey man, it’s great ain’t it? You never learning to spell and talking alltime about cannibals and other adolescent preoccupations. LC? I assume that stands for limited concentration? Loose colon?

    • Old Jules  October 17, 2014 at 5:09 am

      Feeble? Good solid thinking Mr. Feeble. Right you are. Mr Feeble and Mr. Loose colon are peas in pod.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login


TOP 50 READ ARTICLES THIS MONTH
From Veterans Today Network