By Gordon Duff, Senior Editor
The recent events in Paris, whether hateful and obnoxious leftists were shot, and few on this earth begged for it more, or police were killed by terrorists now conclusively proven to have been shooting blanks, we simply don’t care. We are sick of the comic opera of carelessly staged false flag terrorism.
We will be featuring a series of videos that demonstrate ballistic performance. You see, Americans have AK47s and cameras, the French don’t, or most of the them anyway. If they did, whoever staged this might have thought first. When we are done, we will have exposed the epic “false flag fail” of all time. (link to original Liveleak video)
At least in America we hire trained professionals with the exception of the giggling parents from Sandy Hook.
Please note, our “terrorists” were fighting on behalf of French intelligence, the Mossad and the criminal banks, part of the pro-Israeli ISIS organization. How did they get back to France? Only French intelligence services or the Mossad could have flown them to training centers in Turkey or Jordan and, when they “wanted a rest,” back to France.
(Note: Double dust cloud caused by double impact of hot gasses followed by the paper plug from the blank cartridge. Subject (victim?) unaffected by shot drops two frames later. Normally a director would call for a retake in a scene like this.)
Photo represents the first acoustic signature at the speed of sound, 1126 feet per second, received approximately 100 feet away. By that time, the bullet/blank wad, hot gasses, moving at up to 2500 feet per second have pushed a cloud of dust under the still elevated “victim” with hands still raised.
The sound took .088 seconds to reach the camera. An AK round at 2460 feet per second traveling 3 feet would have impacted in .0012 seconds. Based on the differential between light speed and the speed of sound, the victim impact would have been visible .0868 seconds into this frame. By that time, the victim would have been obliterated in a pink mist.
At the time seen the frame, the bullet will have traveled 213 feet unless its path was altered. As noted above, during the first .0012 seconds, it would have obliterated the head of our very alive and well at the time, police officer. Then again, bullets break up chunks of concrete, something we will also demonstrate and don’t simply dust off a sidewalk.
See if an AK round fired into a watermelon causes a dust cloud…
What does this prove?
- No bullet was fired
- There was no impact on the victim
- This was a blank cartridge
Later Sky News came to the scene to photograph the huge blood stain caused by the miss and dust cloud, blood not seen on the actual shooting video, not a single drop. This is totally insane, Jim W. Dean says it looks like it was done with a paint roller. Liquids don’t move around like this, flowing up and down and around unless “helped.” Shame!
[Editor’s Note. Next is a YouTube of a news report at this scene. Note how he says “the blood that has been put there”. The repeats are in the original video. We did nothing to it. Was it just a slip of the tongue? If so, a very strange one indeed. But when you look at the roller paint effect added to this slip, and all the bells and whistles start going off.
Also, as this reporter describes, after all the shooting going on at the Charlie office on the other side of the square, this unarmed cop is just going to be standing there…doing what? He has no weapon. We see no radio in his hand that he would be using to describe the car they might be driving, none was on the sidewalk. And it seems he took no evasive action when two masked guys get out of a car with AK-47s.
Now I ask you normal folks out there, what would you do, unarmed…after hearing the shooting? Would you just stand there or duck and using the parked cars for cover…run like hell. Would a trained police officer just stand there?
If they would have shot me, it would have been in the back or my ass, as I would have been a moving target…still a big disadvantage with two AKs, but a hell of a lot better than standing there, magically taking rounds going right through me and not bleeding…Jim W. Dean]
This is a test of sporting hollow point AK ammo. Military full metal jacket (FMJ) has much more penetration.
Even hollow point sporting ammo goes through several feet of ballistic gel. Thus, even the first rounds would have caused catastrophic physical injury though none could be detected. There is no forensic evidence at the scene any weapon was used whatsoever.
Now for the concrete test:
What do you have to do to declare a false flag fail?
Note again there is no bullet pock mark in the concrete, quite a large hole if an AK is used. (typically 4x4x4 inches) What if someone actually died here. This would mean someone was brought here after the attack and shot but who would do such a thing? Did they video that shooting too?
Then, when in France, though they were obviously on every “no fly” and “terror watch list” in the world, armed to the teeth, they manage to gun down a dozen, dozens, shoot up a synagogue, a delicatessen (I have been looking for a good Jewish deli in Paris for years) and an ADL/JINSA/Simon Wiesenthal “reading room.”
Not only do these jokers magically cross borders, pass through customs like wraiths, they are better armed than the current Wehrmacht. You are telling me they weren’t watched, followed and wiretapped every second? Few nations have the armies of cockroaches trailing visitors around than the French do.
If an American veteran visiting France quickly does an ‘about face’ on a sidewalk, the army of security stooges following them around is likely to collapse in a twisted heap. The French have NO civil rights, no limits to their surveillance state and watch everyone. So, if something happens, France wanted it to happen, France or the “controllers of France,” and France is “controlled.”
The videos are out there, dead police texting “selfies,” or terrorists running through streets that Google Earth can’t find, shooting at walls and sidewalks that don’t exist with bullets that leave no marks into bodies that don’t bleed.
Now the hatefest and media event moves forward.
Don’t believe a word of it. Let’s say “Charlie” was testing their “freedom of speech.” Well, they can consider this test a failure whether or not they were killed (or not) by real terrorists or the “usual suspects,” Mossad assets floated through customs with bombs in their underwear, always without passports, visas or even airline tickets.
If only the rest of us could travel like that!
You know, Europe is filled with “hate speech laws,” typically only protecting Jews, one of the ethnic groups that is notoriously able to defend themselves “speech-wise.” With a virtual stranglehold on press/media/entertainment, taking on “the Jews” in a “hate speechfest” is worse than bringing a knife to a gunfight.
Then again, we have to remember, if one aspect of this was false, and the video totally proves this, then it all is false. If there are dead, the powers that be, whether French Zionists, the Mossad or the criminal gangs of Eurotrash that plague the Middle East and Africa with terror bombings and pretend terror groups like Boko Harum and Al Shabab, wanted them dead.
I do love France, have lived in Paris and maintain a bureau in Paris. The French people are a joy. However, the only bad experiences I have ever had in France have involved young and obnoxious leftists who work tirelessly to destroy the reputation of the French people.
I can well understand that the French find themselves overwhelmed with a large Islamic population. However, France loved that same Islamic population when hundreds of thousands of them died defending France in two world wars plus Indochina.
The French people have the right to feel as they do. However, millions of those French people are Muslims. Has this caused serious problems? Yes!
Is it extremely likely that this “event” was staged to take advantage of these social stresses in order to destabilize France and to promote an anti-Muslim agenda during a time when Europe is turning away from Israel, with many seeing it as a criminal state?
Posted by Gordon Duff, Senior Editor on January 11, 2015, With 45531 Reads Filed under Investigations, Paris Attacks 2015. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.