Kiev Missile Nuked Donetsk

Video analysis outlines missile strike with nuclear warhead

By Jeff Smith and Gordon Duff


The video was supplied by Glen Canady.  The analysis done by Jeff Smith, nuclear physicist and nuclear weapons expert, former investigator for the IAEA.

The date is August 2014, location Donetsk.  The evidence indicates a nuclear missile attack, ground to ground, launched by the Kiev government.  No conventional, thermobaric or otherwise, weapon could have done this.

There is clear evidence of a missile.  We waited for someone to act, do something, say something meaningful, then we acted.  We clearly have a nuclear war ongoing in the Ukraine.  From Jeff Smith:

35 to 40 seconds in on the right hand side of the video is the nuke going off. The Yellow Orange flash is from alpha and beta radiation being generated in the atmosphere by the warhead detonation. The Radar proximity fuse detonated the warhead between 1,000 to 3,000 feet in altitude.

The primary then completed full detonation when it hit the ground. The nuke took about three seconds to completely implode. It was probably intended to be detonated at a much higher altitude. Based on the blast size it was 5k or less in size. The time delay in the shock wave velocity will also determine the blast size.

There were two detonations the first produced sounds of a conventional ammo dump being blown up. (The cover for the nuke) The second was a ground launched mini nuke. (A lance missile probably; or a similar type; this is how they are designed to work)

The angle of the yellow streamer will show the direction of launch. The Ukraine has no such weapons so somebody else provided it or sold it to them. These things are not cheap so what was the real targets value and to whom? Someone paid several million dollars to use that weapon. So what or who was the intended high target?

Geiger counters on the ground and chemical soil tests are the only way to prove it. Again this is where the IAEA weapons of mass destruction unit should step in.

If it leaves a crater bigger than 5 feet deep then it was over 2 thousand pounds in size, thus it was not
conventional. Look at old WW2 and Vietnam 1,000 lb bomb blast crater photos for reference.

You need to get a freeze frame of the video from 35 to 40 seconds in. (below)

“If a man reads or hears a criticism of anything in which he has an interest, watch … if he shows concern with any question except ‘is it true?’ he thereby reveals that his own attitude is unscientific. Likewise if … he judges an idea not on its merits but with reference to the author of it; if he criticizes it as ‘heresy’; if he argues that authority must be right because it is authority … The path of truth is paved with critical doubt, and lighted by the spirit of objective inquiry… the majority of people have resented what seems in retrospect to have been purely matter of fact … nothing has aided the persistence of falsehood, and the evils resulting from it, more than the unwillingness of good people to admit the truth … the tendency continues to be shocked by natural comment, and to hold certain things too ‘sacred’ to think about. … How rarely does one meet anyone whose first reaction to anything is to ask: ‘is it true?’ Yet, unless that is a man’s natural reaction, it shows that truth is not uppermost in his mind, and unless it is, true progress is unlikely.”  Sir Basil Henry Liddell Hart, Why Don’t We Learn from History?, PEN Books, 1944; revised edition, Allen and Unwin, 1972



gg_128 gg_129 gg_130 gg_131 gg_132 gg_133 gg_134 gg_135 gg_136

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17

Related Posts:

The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT, VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians, or the Veterans Today Network and its assigns. LEGAL NOTICE - COMMENT POLICY

Posted by on February 13, 2015, With 24165 Reads Filed under WarZone. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Comments Closed

13 Responses to "Kiev Missile Nuked Donetsk"

  1. Kat Kan  February 15, 2015 at 12:47 pm

    This story is about something in AUGUST. The huge crater being posted in February is from a big explosion in February. which was also being touted as nuclear bu people who don’t know what they’re talking about. The February one was caused by a simple Tochka-U which they know because they found the remains of it.
    Here are all 4 known views of the Feb 7 blast
    this is the crater
    which makes a lie out of the claim in this article about “..If it leaves a crater bigger than 5 feet deep then it was over 2 thousand pounds in size, thus it was not
    conventional.” as the Tochka-U is only a 500lb warhead. Besides there are numerous pictures of craters 10 or 12 ft deep in suburban streets, from smaller missiles.

    In ANY CASE nuclear explosions ALWAYS cause radiation. Ukraine has 6 nuclear power stations so is full of radiation monitoring stations. There are hundreds of these in all nearby countries, too. They would NOT keep quiet about a nuclear explosion right next door.

    So, more facts and less silly speculation please.

  2. philippe  February 15, 2015 at 10:43 am

    3rd you-know-whom-people sending as ‘sniper’-nukes to get big war on & others know ;but pretend to ignore for now ??

  3. philippe  February 15, 2015 at 10:30 am

    most impt : it’s real : look

  4. pjs  February 14, 2015 at 1:18 pm

    I don’t understand Mr Duff. You know this article is based on a falsified video…


  5. drbhelthi  February 14, 2015 at 8:37 am

    As to Todd Butson, someone might inform him that Israel used mini-nukes on the WTC, and that there are various types of nukes in addition to various strengths of nukes.
    The explosion off Yalta might have been Israel testing undewater nukes to determine the strength needed to create a tidal wave for Crimea.

  6. Morgan Starr ☉  February 14, 2015 at 7:18 am

    Is there any info on the flying thing? It almost looks like it’s flapping its wings! Very strange.

  7. Gordon Duff  February 13, 2015 at 6:52 pm

    not sure

  8. Enrico  February 13, 2015 at 12:59 pm

    The cloud on the left is the launch exhaust of a missile that destructed on lift off….this is what I concluded after seeing the initial report in the Mike Harris show chat…….as GD stated a soil sample would be conclusive…..knowing the desperation the neo bolsheviks in kiev to provoke the russian federation I would not put it past them …….IMO the latest reported chemical plant explosion was a nuke….just being the devils advocate on this one.

  9. James B  February 13, 2015 at 12:04 pm

    Here is a video that Veterans Today has not seen I think, video of the crater after the explosion maybe they have see it I do not know

  10. LightSaber  February 13, 2015 at 11:14 am

    Many say Sorcha Fall is a CIA disinfo front, but only there I can find info like this:
    [Brian Williams and – just deceased – Ned Colt, David Carr, Bob Simon] “the four of them had formed an independent video news company last month and filed the necessary security documents that would allow them access to the Kremlin’s most secret archive of evidence relating to the 11 September 2001 attacks.”

    Any confirmation?

  11. Mopar21277  February 13, 2015 at 10:35 am

    Wow, those diagrams of the “damage radii” are frightening, with the 10KT having a “moderate damage” diameter of 2 miles; what would a 10MT have for a damage radius?

  12. Gustavo  February 13, 2015 at 8:15 am

    There’s some kind of orb, probably taking samples from the smoke cloud, beggining at 1:32.
    You can even see it sucking the smoke in at some points.
    Someone was very interested in this event.

  13. Codoh  February 13, 2015 at 7:24 am

    Recently there was another highly similar ‘rocket attack’ around Donetsk. The video is of a security camera recording it.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

From Veterans Today Network