Jim Fetzer, a former Marine Corps officer, has published widely on the theoretical foundations of scientific knowledge, computer science, artificial intelligence, cognitive science, and evolution and mentality.

McKnight Professor Emeritus at the University of Minnesota Duluth, he has also conducted extensive research into the assassination of JFK, the events of 9/11, and the plane crash that killed US Sen. Paul Wellstone.

The founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, his latest books include The Evolution of Intelligence (2005), The 9/11 Conspiracy (2007), Render Unto Darwin (2007), and The Place of Probability in Science (2010).


View Latest Posts >>>

A FEMA Capstone Event unraveling: More proof Sandy Hook was staged

A FEMA Capstone Event unraveling: More proof Sandy Hook was staged

 

by Jim Fetzer (with Wolfgang Halbig)

“[W]e have here a stunning illustration of the Hollywood practice of filming scenes out of order to edit together properly on a later occasion”–on Wolfgang Halbig’s latest proof that Sandy Hook was staged

Wolfgang in his youth

Wolfgang in his wayward youth

The massive redaction of the FBI Report on Sandy Hook has led me to write to the FBI for an explanation. But I don’t expect to hear back from them any time soon.

There is so much to cover up, where, at least since the death of JFK, the agency has been used to commit and cover up crimes by the government, not solve them.

The situation is completely absurd, but that is the state of affairs in the USA today. When I was a young man, we had a government worthy of our respect. That time is long gone.

Wolfgang Halbig has discovered a video that includes the date and time stamps, which have been removed from most of the others that have been broadcast on the air.

What it shows is the staging of an event in the afternoon–around 12:45 PM/ET–which the official police records report as having happened around 9:35 AM/ET instead.

It was this kind of sloppy work (apparently by Osbidian Analysis under contract to DHS and FEMA) that put this together, never anticipating it would be subject to micro-analysis. Here Wolf and I discuss his latest discoveries:

Wolf and Jim on FEMA Capstone

We are witnessing the unraveling of a FEMA Capstone National Level Exercise, which had taken years in the planning and involved the whole community and government officials from the local to the state and ultimately the national level, as “Top Ten Reasons: Sandy Hook was an elaborate hoax” as well as Sofia Smallstorm’s “Unraveling Sandy Hook” have previously observed.

Governor Malloy’s Press Conference

As virtually every student of Sandy Hook must be aware, Governor Malloy held a press conference that day with his Lt. Governor and explained that he had been “spoken to” that something like this might happen. There are only two choices as to what he was told: (1) that there would be a mass shooting in a Connecticut public school; or (2) that a drill would be conducted in an abandoned school but be presented as an actual event.

The person by whom he was “spoken to” has to have been United States Attorney General, Eric Holder, who met with him on 27 November 2012, which was less than a month before the Sandy Hook event on 14 December 2012. That they were going to discuss “Project Longevity”, a priority of the Barack Obama administration, was widely announced in advance, including this article published worldwide by Reuters:

Operation Longevity

Eric Holder on gun control

Less well known is that, for the Attorney General, gun control has been a passion, which is illustrated by the speech he gave to the Women’s National Democratic Club on 30 January 1995. He states his goal in clear and precise language: “We have to be repetitive about this,” he said. “We need to do this every day of the week, and just really brainwash people into thinking about guns in a vastly different way.” Listen to what Eric Holder says:

When it comes to an event like Sandy Hook, which appears to have been a drill that was presented as if it were a real event, who would be in a better position to promote such a gross deception than the Attorney General? Indeed, the following evidence suggests that the chain of command ran from Barack Obama to Eric Holder to Governor Malloy, the State Police, the Newtown Police, the Newtown School Board and The Newtown Bee.

The FBI Report on Sandy Hook

 

The FBI  has now released its report about Sandy Hook, which has been so massively redacted that it looks worse than a chunk of Swiss cheese. As Wolfgang has asked, “What does the FBI have to hide about Sandy Hook?” Barack Obama said he would utilize the full resources of the federal government to determine what happened there. Wolf wanted to know so he could apprise other school districts of how to avoid a replication at their schools. This is simply obscene:

Redacted FBI report on Sandy Hook

As Dave Altimari has reported in The Hartford Courant, “Of the 175 pages released in response to a Courant Freedom of Information request, 64 were completely redacted and most of the other 111 pages were heavily redacted.” If the official account of a single demented shooter taking out 20 children and 6 adults on 14 December 2012 were true, there would be nothing to redact. He came, he shot, he died.  There should be no more to it than that.

My inquiry to the FBI

 

A few questions about Sandy Hook . . . .                                                                                      4:26 PM (21 hours ago)

to andrew.ames, bcc: wolfgang, bcc: Day

Andrew,

As a journalist and editor for Veterans Today, I am doing research on Sandy Hook and have a couple of questions for you as representing the FBI. I shall appreciate hearing from you.

I have noted that the FBI’s report is massively redacted: 64 of its 175 pages are completely redacted and most of the other 111 partially.

(1) What was the purpose of the redactions?

(2) If Adam Lanza came to the school, shot 26 persons and then himself, what’s to hide?

(3) How can other school systems learn from a report to guard against anything like it from happening to them when its mostly redacted?

(4) Eric Holder met with Governor Malloy on 27 November 2012, only a few months prior to the event. Did they discuss any issues that were related to school shootings or drills?

(5) Eric Holder has a reputation as a fanatic gun-control enthusiast, even telling those at a Women’s Conference in 1995 that the public needs to be “brainwashed” to change its attitude on guns. Was this a drill to promote that agenda?

(6) I have reports that national security letters were sent to residents with 25 miles of SHES advising them that they could not talk about it. Were any such letters sent? And if so, WHY? I am asking about any NSLs or variations on the theme, such as cease and desist orders.

Thanks for getting back to me promptly. I am working on a deadline to publish this Friday.

With appreciation,

Jim

James H. Fetzer, Ph.D.

Journalist and Editor

(h):

(c):

veteranstoday.com

Since I had mentioned I was working on a deadline to publish by today, that should have been an incentive for him to respond promptly. Instead, I have no doubt that it was interpreted as an opportunity to stonewall and withhold the information I requested until my deadline had passed, in the hope that, when a response was eventually made, it would no longer be useful or relevant. This is the kind of test that differentiates a corrupt agency from an honest one.

The glaring “two shadows” inconsistency

Since learning that the data dump by the Connecticut State Police was the “script” for the Sandy Hook simulation, Wolf has been publishing an annotated version that exposes the shoddy work (apparently by the Washington, D.C., firm of Obsidian Analysis under contract by FEMA and DHS) on his sandyhookjustice.com web site. Here are some passages from SANDY HOOK SCRIPT Part  1, where the police report a teacher has seen “two shadows” passing by the school:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w0wzp_u1aTA

 

9:38:53 McGowan: “67 to 56 (Kullgren), I am going up Crestwood.”

9:39:00 Kullgren: “Roger that, we will stage up here in the front and we will go from there.”

While in route to the scene I Kullgren S6 directed two officers 67 and 95 to approach the school from the rear of the school via Crestwood Drive all other responding units were to stage with me halfway down Dickinson Drive.

So how does Shannon Hicks from the Newtown Bee get by those police officers when shots are being fired and they have a huge crime scene to manage until it is safe?

9:39:12 Nute: “67 (McGowan) you’re on Crestwood, Crestwood?”

9:39:16 McGowan: “Roger.”

9:39:17 Nute: “Alright, I have reports that the teachers saw two shadows running past the building past the gym which would be the rear … Alright they still hear shooting.”

How is that possible when the Director of the communication center at a 911 Conference tells the audience that they received only four land line 911 calls on Dec 14, 2012 and all other cell phone calls went directly to the CT State Police dispatchers?

This is the Director Maureen Will of the 911 call center for the Newtown Police Department.

Listen to her Key Note Speech as to how great they did on that tragic day.

Only four land line calls, she states. She refuses to tell us who the fourth caller was. Why? Listen to her own words in this video presentation [Editor’s note: embedded above].

Notice, in particular, that the “two shadows” passing by were reported to have occurred at approximately 9:39 AM/CT or a few minutes before. This is part of the official recording of the radio correspondence between the police and their dispatcher. What Wolf has now found is a video that shows the figures who presumably cast those shadows, but now in the afternoon, long after the crime scene was officially secure:

Notice now the date and time shown reveals that the figures who presumably cast those shadows are being tracked as they run from the parking lot, past the school (thereby casting those shadows) and into the woods with officers in hot pursuit. But unless we are prepared to acknowledge backward causation (where a cause can occur after its effects), we have here a stunning illustration of the Hollywood practice of filming scenes out of order to edit together properly on a later occasion.

Wolfgang Halbig’s letter to the FBI

Wolf thought this was such a glaring inconsistency that it deserved a letter to the FBI. Just as he had offered to assist Obsidian Analysis in planning and scripting future drills (to avoid committing such colossal blunders as having a dozen or more affidavits from Connecticut State Troopers that they entered through the broken glass window), here he invites their attention to the gross inconsistency of having “two shadows” reported at approximately 9:39 AM/ET, while the figures that presumably cast them were being filmed at 12:45 PM/ET:

From: Wolfgang Halbig <wolfgang.halbig@comcast.net>

Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 08:01:26 -0400

To: <anchoragefbi@ak.net>, <phoenix@ic.fbi.gov>, <Little.Rock@ic.fbi.gov>, <san.francisco@ic.fbi.gov>, <newhaven@ic.fbi.gov>, <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, <Miami@ic.fbi.gov>, <tampa.division@ic.fbi.gov>, <chicago@ic.fbi.gov>, <springfield@ic.fbi.gov>, <Indianapolis@ic.fbi.gov>, <Neworleans@ic.fbi.gov>, <Baltimore@ic.fbi.gov>, <Boston@ic.fbi.gov>, <minneapolis@ic.fbi.gov>, <fbijn@leo.gov>, <kansas.city@ic.fbi.gov>, <stlouis@ic.fbi.gov>, <Omaha@ic.fbi.gov>, <buffalo@ic.fbi.gov>, <Charlotte.public@ic.fbi.gov>, <Cincinnati@ic.fbi.gov>, <cleveland.cv@ic.fbi.gov>, <portland@ic.fbi.gov>, <philadelphia.complaints@ic.fbi.gov>, <knoxville@ic.fbi.gov>, <knoxville@ic.fbi.gov>, <fbi.dallas@ic.fbi.gov>, <Houston.Texas@ic.fbi.gov>, <SanAntonio@ic.fbi.gov>, <SaltLakeCity@ic.fbi.gov>, <Norfolk_FO@ic.fbi.gov>, <Richmond@ic.fbi.gov>, <Seattle.fbi@ic.fbi.gov>

Subject: Please use this video in all your FBI training classes to help you solve the Sandy Hook School Shooting since you redacted your final report

FBI:
As a former Florida State Trooper who worked in Miami, Florida and was used as a backup when the FBI needed support I developed a close working relationship with your agency.
I was also assigned by the Secret Service to work President Nixon’s security detail at his Key Biscayne compound.
You have a difficult job and I just want to help in any way I can.
I am providing you a video in the event you missed it the first time around showing the biggest screw up ever witnessed by a former law enforcement officer and I want to make sure that it is available to you for training purposes.
The video is shown in LIVE Time taken by a helicopter which I believe did not realize what they where actually doing.  They were not part of the script.
How can you be doing what they are shown doing at 12:27 pm on Dec 14, 2012 when the Sandy Hook Elementary School was announced to be safe by law enforcement as observed in the police transmission?
You were there, so you must have observed this ridiculous Homeland Security and FEMA Capstone Exercise which failed so miserably–and you where part of it by redacting your reports.
The next time do not allow the News Media to actually capture people being chased in the woods in a LIVE SHOT which makes this entire Illusion a huge FRAUD and to collect $29 million dollars for this by giving people is outright FRAUD.
This scripted incident has caused Panic and Fear therefore Inflicting Emotional Distress on Millions of Americans who did not deserve this.
I only hope this video will help you because this should never ever happen again in our America.
Wolfgang W Halbig

Here is the video that Wolfgang links at the end of his message to the FBI. It offers a nice analysis of why the state of Connecticut may have been chosen for this event, given the absence of a county-wide system of sheriffs as law enforcement officials, because of which the Connecticut State Police have greater authority in other states. But in this case they appear to have been executing the plan under the control of FEMA and DHS, not as some kind of threat against them:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vQQwWjWCucA

The analysis of the seven figures running past the school deserves attention here, especially since the timeline is inconsistent with the official police reports. And, when he asks about a “familiar figure” with the children in the “iconic” Shannon Hicks’ photograph, some have suggested that she looks familiar because she is familiar as the woman who was officially the principal of Sandy Hook Elementary School, Dawn Hochsprung, who was officially already dead, which was a nice touch!

A FEMA Capstone event

FEMA Integrated Capstone Event

Wolfgang has faulted himself for being so slow in appreciating that this was a FEMA Capstone event, which are national-level exercises (NLEs) that emanate from the highest office in the land, the President of the United States, and bring together whole communities, including faith-based organizations, to conduct coordinated efforts, where they can be two or more years in the planning. He fully acknowledges Sofia Smallstorm had it right and that he has been slow to appreciate what she explained in her video study, “Unraveling Sandy Hook”:

The Sandy Hook Homeland Security Illusion
December 14, 2012
 
Homeland and FEMA Capstone Exercise 2012
 
NLE 2012 participation includes the Executive Office of the President, federal, state, local, tribal and territorial department and agency officials and emergency operations elements, nongovernmental and private sector organizations and international partners. The four major exercises are:
 
      Whole Community approach encompasses understanding and meeting the true needs of the entire affectedcommunity; engaging all aspects of the community (public, private, and civic) in defining those needs and devising ways to meet them; and strengthening the assets, institutions, and social processes that work well to improve resilience and emergency management outcomes.

 

Indeed, this appears to be the key to understanding why no whistle-blowers have come from the community: they were all complicit in conducting the drill, whereas most may have been unaware that it was going to be presented as though it had been an actual school massacre. It may even be that, like those who were hired to demolish the building, similar gag orders were imposed upon them to never reveal the truth. That may have been their commitment, but we are dismembering–piece by piece–the astonishing deception known as “Sandy Hook”.

Wolfgang Halbig, a former Florida State Trooper, served in public school administration for more than 35 years and is a nationally recognized school-safety expert.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Related Posts:



The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT, VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians, or the Veterans Today Network and its assigns. LEGAL NOTICE - COMMENT POLICY

brightoncollege
Posted by on May 1, 2015, With 18828 Reads Filed under Investigations, Of Interest, Sandy Hook. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Comments Closed

25 Responses to "A FEMA Capstone Event unraveling: More proof Sandy Hook was staged"

  1. John Kesich  September 14, 2014 at 9:11 am

    Once again the theory that Sandy Hook was all about “taking away our guns” has been trotted out. What nonsense. Despite the huge public outcry afterward, we didn’t even get sane uniform background checks.

    Can anyone name a single place where the US has banned guns after delivering “democracy”? Iraq? Afghanistan? Libya?

    The point of Sandy Hook is to justify militarized police. Why would the government care about armed citizens – Waco and Ruby Ridge showed what happens when citizens defend themselves

    When police can openly murder people with impunity, as they did with Kenneth Chamberlain, would they care if their victim is armed? They might even welcome the excuse to ratchet up their fire power. Anyone seriously think whatever weapons they own would stand a chance against one or more missile armed drones?

    What puzzles me is, if Sandy Hook was staged, why? Surely none of the psychopaths involved would have any qualms about slaughtering a couple dozen people, so why go through the trouble of staging a massacre when it might even be easier to carry out a real one? I’m sure Mossad would have been more than happy to lend a wet team.

    • Jim Fetzer  September 14, 2014 at 10:25 am

      Why are you even posting about Sandy Hook when you appear to be so abysmally ignorant about it? And your stance regarding gun control as an Obama/Holder objective is contradicted by Holder himself right here. The proof this was a staged event is simply overwhelming. Start there and work backwards

      “Top Ten Reasons Sandy Hook was an elaborate hoax”
      http //www.veteranstoday.com/2014 /01/07/top-ten-reasons-sandy-hook-was-an-elaborate-hoax/

      “Sandy Hook Redux Obama officials confirm that it was a drill and no children died”
      http //www.veteranstoday.com/2014/06/13/sandy-hook-redux-obama-officials-confirm-that-it-was-a-drill-and-no-children-died/

      “Sandy Hook Ten more proofs that vitiate the official account”
      http //www.veteranstoday.com/2014/09/03/sandy-hook-ten-more-proofs-that-vitiate-the-official-account/

    • Debrided  September 15, 2014 at 8:45 pm

      U.S. gun and ammunition sales skyrocketed as a result of the Sandy Hook Full Scale Exercise. I also question the ‘taking away of our guns’ as the true motive. Considering that, ” Nothing happens in government by mistake.” The overwhelming result of Sandy Hook is millions of Americans have armed themselves more heavily than ever. Why would our puppet masters want this?

    • Jim Fetzer  September 15, 2014 at 8:57 pm

      This appears to have been an unintended consequence of an intentional action. Gun laws have been significantly strengthened in New York, California and Connecticut, while Colorado–where Tom Ready recently expressed his skepticism about Sandy Hook–has passed four laws on gun control. I was stunned on the day of the Boston bombing when Obama came out for a press conference and was more upset that Congress had not pass gun control legislation than the bombing itself. And he has been issuing a series of executive orders to increase gun control. But I applaud the American people for their response by buying more.

    • Debrided  September 15, 2014 at 10:33 pm

      Democrats are well known for their gun control laws. Gun sales rose when Democrat Obama was selected. A perceived school shooting during Obama’s presidency, coupled with Obama’s threats of gun bans, would surely cause increased gun and ammunition buying.
      The few states with stricter gun laws are in the minority considering we have 50 states. ” Nothing happens in government by mistake.”

    • MrMarco855 .  September 25, 2014 at 7:05 pm

      If they succeed with legislation to eventually take away our guns, the temporary increase in gun ownership is a mute point. You asked why would they want this(increased gun ownership)? They’re goal is to disarm us the number of guns we have today isn’t a concern for them because they’re going to push through the laws they’re seeking…..and it’ll be bye bye guns…….

    • John Kesich  September 21, 2014 at 10:08 am

      Dr Fetzer,

      I had read all the articles you referenced before posting so perhaps I’m not as abysmally ignorant as you’d like people to believe.

      Would it not be easier to carry out an actual massacre than to stage an elaborate hoax? For a hoax one either has to invent fictitious victims or make real people disappear after their faked deaths. National Security Letters or no, would you feel confident that none of the kids who unwittingly took part won’t inadvertently give the game away? Do you concede that an actual massacre would be simpler? If so, can you explain why the psychopaths behind Sandy Hook would choose to go with a hoax? Why didn’t they just send in a wet team?

      As for their motivation, I notice that the clip you included is of a much younger Eric Holder. Can you tell me when it was filmed and why you didn’t use a quote made after Sandy Hook? Maybe because right after Sandy Hook Jay Carney’s remark that, “now is not the time [for gun control reform]” was the administration’s position? In any event, politicians lie so we are far better off considering what they do rather than what they say. As I mentioned in my original post, Obama didn’t even get universal background checks when it would have taken very little effort on his part to get them.
      I’d say state gun cotrol reforrms were the unintended consequence here.

    • Jim Fetzer  September 21, 2014 at 10:41 am

      John, I have it in “My pick of the top ten articles/interviews/videos” article as well. It was him speaking to a Democratic Women’s Conference in Washington, D.C., in 1995. That makes it more illuminating, because his views on gun control are not only exceptionally strong but of long standing. After the event, he is going to be very careful about what he says, but he met with the Governor less than three weeks before the event and appears to have been the person by whom he and the Lt. Governor were “spoken to”. And how many members of the community would go along with it IF THEY ACTUALLY MASSACRED 20 CHILDREN? You are simply not thinking straight. It was indispensable to draw the whole community into this so they would not blow their cover. See my article about “Threats and Bribes used to suppress information about Sandy Hook”.

    • John Kesich  September 26, 2014 at 10:59 am

      Dr Fetzer,

      Please don’t put words in my mouth – particularly completely idiotic words. I never suggested that any community would go along with having their children slaughtered. It is a cheap shot for you to imply that I did.

      So let’s see if I can rephrase my question in such a way that there is no possibility that you can misunderstand – or pretend to.

      There is evidence that Sandy Hook was staged.

      Staging this event involves either creating numerous fake victims, or else disappearing real people. It also involves creating a whole community of potential whistleblowers.

      On the other hand, one could simply pick an appropriate school and – I shouldn’t really have to spell this out – WITHOUT CONSULTING THE COMMUNITY, send in a wet team to murder however many victims and pin it on a lone nut. The only worry with a real massacre is that one or more of the hitmen get caught or decide to blab.

      Do you have any theory as to why the fake massacre was chosen?

      To put this yet another way, why was a fake massacre chosen for Sandy Hook but a real one in Norway?

    • Jim Fetzer  September 14, 2014 at 11:26 am

      Are you also unaware that DHS has acquired 2 billion rounds of .40 caliber hollow-point ammunition, which is not even permissible in combat under the Hague Convention of 1899? that it has been obtaining light tanks and assault weapons? that it has made arrangements with mortuaries and funeral homes should there be an unspecified event with more wounded than hospitals and emergency medical centers can handle? I have published several articles about all of this, including “From America to Amerika The End Game”, http //www.veteranstoday.com/2011/12/11/from-america-to-amerika-the-end-game/ They don’t want to confront 100,000,000 armed Americans opposing a fascistic military state.

    • jake gittes  September 14, 2014 at 11:39 am

      “why go through the trouble of staging a massacre when it might even be easier to carry out a real one?”

      Seems very plausible to me that Obama signed off on a hoax providing that no children be hurt. They weren’t counting on — or didn’t care — that a segment of the population would be questioning the official li(n)e.

      “Once again the theory that Sandy Hook was all about “taking away our guns” has been trotted out. What nonsense. Despite the huge public outcry afterward, we didn’t even get sane uniform background checks.”

      http //www.newsmax.com/US/Connecticut-guns-rights-Newtown/2014/03/24/id/561371/

      “The law, passed last April in response to the Sandy Hook Elementary School shootings, put in place bans on magazines that carry more than 10 rounds of ammunition and on many types of weapons, including those that simply have the cosmetic appearance of assault weapons. The law also requires residents to undergo mental and criminal background checks and to register certain types of guns with authorities.”

      Shill much?

    • Chandler  September 14, 2014 at 8:27 pm

      The cry for gun control by many witnesses and local residents in Newtown and Washington D.C. was heard immediately afterward. The original goal may not have been taking guns but it became that issue right after it all happened. Whether this was the issue or not, the issue remains it was a sloppily organized, pathetically carried out, and poorly acted, while taking donations from the sympathetic public who will now more than likely, hesitate to stop giving so generously. My God, look what these hideous power figures have done at both federal and state levels? Even this is so obvious. The way these people lie so easily and methodically-whatever their goal or reason or intentions, they all need to be impeached, indicted, and imprisoned for treasonous acts, and traitorous intent.

    • Sarah R  September 15, 2014 at 5:40 am

      It seems simple to me to just check the obituaries on those that died. Did they or did they not die?

    • Jim Fetzer  September 15, 2014 at 6:58 am

      They held phony funerals. What challenge would it pose to publish fake obituaries? If the absence of children being evacuated, the missing EMTs and buses, the staged Shannon Hicks’ “iconic” photograph, the inept “final report” that does not establish a causal nexus linking the alleged shooter, his purported weapons and victims, the proof the school had been abandoned by 2008, the false affidavits by Connecticut State Troopers, the confirmation by Obama administration officials in the Department of Defense that this was a drill and no children died and so much more don’t convince you this was a staged event, I can’t imagine what would.

    • franktalk  September 16, 2014 at 1:22 pm

      Jim, I was wondering if after the Aurora,Co shooting they got to much internal flake for actually killing folks and changed MO. I only saw convincing pictures and scopolamine evidenced behavior ( However, not being present I don’t know if that was even true).

  2. lieutenantM  September 13, 2014 at 5:47 pm

    Here is how we can blow a huge hole in the Congress this Nov. Please spread this

    https //www.youtube.com/watch?v=JS3SyB37uM0 [12 min vid..stay to the end]

    2LT Dennis Morrisseau USArmy [armor – Vietnam era] retired. W Pawlet, VT 802 645 9727
    dmorso1@netzero.net

    • captain obvious  September 14, 2014 at 5:37 am

      agree, getting incumbents OUT, even if replaced by a new complete puppet, slows their agendas SOME anyway, and a little more chance the new clown makes a big mistake revealing themselves..
      but how can it work with the rigged (s)elections they’ve put in place?

  3. jake gittes  September 13, 2014 at 4:50 pm

    http //newtown.sandyhook.schooldesk.net/AboutUs/Scrapbook20122013/tabid/18959/Default.aspx

    Schools in this district have similar websites. Most have a link to “scrapbooks” for events from that year. Even if you consider that nothing would have been added in Dec. and possibly the rest of the year, only two “events” are in the 2012-13 scrapbook prior to December at Sandy Hook? One of those is not even students or an event, but three photos of ducks. The other “event” is a half-dozen shots of the SHES freshly-landscaped courtyard, and only a handful of students sitting around in half of THOSE, which easily could have been staged. But in the age of everyone owning a digital camera, nothing besides a half dozen kids sitting around the freshly-landscaped courtyard quietly reading was photo-worthy that entire first semester?

    Does not make a good case for an active school.

  4. jake gittes  September 13, 2014 at 4:15 pm

    Speaking of Shannon Hicks and Dawn Hochsprung…

    Here’s that photo Dawn Hochsprung apparently tweeted back in October of a fire drill —

    http //www.businessinsider.com/sandy-hook-dawn-hochsprung-evacuation-drill-pic-2012-12

    This is the behind the fire station. The structure behind them is the fire station’s little cookout building. Note how much colder it is in October than it is at “10 09 a.m.” of “12-14-12.”

    Also, say Sandy Hook WAS closed at the time and they were already using another school. This very easily could have been a “fire drill” on a field trip to the fire station. Note the cones. When it’s time to get back on the bus, stay in your class, in a single-file line behind the cones…

    As for Shannon Hicks.. where are the rest of her photos from that day? Where are the zillion other shots that would have been taken that day? No experienced newspaper person would have shot 3 pictures and quit. WOULDN’T HAVE HAPPENED.

  5. Chandler  September 13, 2014 at 12:43 pm

    They must manufacture their statistics because they know where We the People are armed crime goes down. Plus, these traitors know the Americans are the last people they need to blame for these “tragedies.”
    Common sense should tell anyone watching the films of the Boston bombing event that it is a directional bomb planted by one of those khaki-pants’-black-jacketed agents who was seen with one before he ran across the street without one. Even the video of the surviving patsy Dzokhar (who by the way, conveniently cannot talk,) shows he has his backpack which looks nothing like the one the famous mainstream media showed claiming it is the one they had. This backpack has the insignia of the agency this black-jacketed thug worked for since more than 15 agents were there that day ironically directly across the street from where the directional bomb was exploded. (Afterward is when the amputee actors dashed to their positions, and were strapped with their props.)
    So obvious yet so denied. The gullible American lemmings in this country are going to feel mighty sorry and regretful when they discover the consequences of their refusal to awaken to these the truth of these hoaxes, brought to us by the Department of Homeland Security. None of this happened until the Bush crime family established it.

    • Chandler  September 13, 2014 at 1:01 pm

      Sandy Hook is even easier to admit than Boston bombing, though both are fairly obvious. Here are young fellow looking to frail and milquetoast to even pick up the weapon, let alone fire without screaming mama while holding on to it. Like the little girl at the shooting range who lost control and killed the instructor, Adam Lanza (if he existed at all and wasn’t photo-shopped,) could not have held on to the same style rapid fire assault weapon and maintain any accuracy they claim he performed.
      In Boston, sure, a few innocent people may have been hurt unintentionally. Highly doubtful anything the late Tamerlan did as well as the currently muted Dzokhar ignited the bombing. Beyond a shadow of a doubt neither of these hoaxes wee actually committed by anyone other than government-paid (taxpayer money,) individuals or agencies. What we do about it now I support, and can do little else. I can write my opinions and read others’ opinions and shake my head and ask, where are you all missing the solid, objective and glaring evidence of these hoaxes? thanks Mr. Fetzer and Mr. Halbig. How far would this issue had subdued us if you had not exposed these traitorous acts, and blantant lies? Where did all the money go that thousands sent for Sandy Hook aid and relief??????

  6. stephanaugust  September 13, 2014 at 11:02 am

    How is the redaction done in an official document?

    Is it done on the printed paper document, or in a word processing program (like Microsoft Word) when the document is a file on the hard drive?

    • Jim Fetzer  September 13, 2014 at 1:09 pm

      I do not know for a fact, but the uniformity of the redactions suggests to me that it was done electronically.

    • stephanaugust  September 13, 2014 at 2:14 pm

      I had no idea that Google would find the answer.

      “Word 2007/2010 Redaction Tool

      The Word 2007/2010 Redaction Tool can be used to redact text within Microsoft Office Word documents.

      Overview

      The Word 2007/2010 Redaction tool works by allowing users to redact a document using a two stage process

      First, regions of text which should be redacted are marked within the document. Second, the marked document is redacted, and all marked text is replaced.”

      http://www.redaction.codeplex.com/

  7. Grampah  September 13, 2014 at 10:15 am

    Excellent. Most people have no concept that such an event is paid for, planned, carried out and kept quiet via National Security Letters and outright cash bribery.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login


TOP 50 READ ARTICLES THIS MONTH
From Veterans Today Network