Jim Fetzer, a former Marine Corps officer, has published widely on the theoretical foundations of scientific knowledge, computer science, artificial intelligence, cognitive science, and evolution and mentality.

McKnight Professor Emeritus at the University of Minnesota Duluth, he has also conducted extensive research into the assassination of JFK, the events of 9/11, and the plane crash that killed US Sen. Paul Wellstone.

The founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, his latest books include The Evolution of Intelligence (2005), The 9/11 Conspiracy (2007), Render Unto Darwin (2007), and The Place of Probability in Science (2010).

View Latest Posts >>>

Sandy Hook: Huge Hoax and Anti-Gun “Psy Op”

DISCLOSURE: The views expressed herein are views of the author exclusively and not the views of VT, VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians or the Veterans Today Network and its assigns. The views belong exclusively to author Jim Fetzer.

By Jim Fetzer and Dennis Cimino


“The page you requested was not found.”–Anthony J. Hilder facebook page notice

There are obvious signs that tell the difference between genuine and fabricated event. The recent shooting of police and firemen responding to a deliberately-set fire has all the signs of being a bona fide event: there is a single consistent narrative, one shooter has been clearly identified, and there has been no good reason to doubt that the subject, William Spengler, went off the rails and committed the crimes. There are many articles about it, which relate the same basic themes: “Killer of 2 NY Firemen had semiautomatic rifle, left note”: Police say the man who lured firefighters in Webster, N.Y., into a deadly ambush had the same make and caliber semiautomatic rifle as the one used in the Connecticut school massacre. Webster Police Chief Gerald Pickering said Tuesday that 62-year-old William Spengler was armed with a .223-caliber Bushmaster rifle, a .38-caliber revolver and a 12-gauge shotgun in Monday’s ambush. Spengler killed two firefighters and wounded two others before fatally shooting himself.” However bizarre the event, there is nothing about it that suggests it was either a hoax or a psy op.


In the case of Sandy Hook, however, the situation is completely different, where we have one inconsistency after another: the mother was a teacher there and Adam was a student; the mother was not a teacher there an Adam was not a student. One shooter was involved, yet police radio reports show a second suspect was apprehended at the scene and a police helicopter video show yet a third suspect being tracked in the woods. The principal called the local paper about the shooting; the principal was dead on the scene. Excellent studies of the incoherence of the Sandy Hook narrative have been published by Niall Bradley, “Sandy Hook massacre story spins out of control” (Veterans Today, 20 December 2012) and by Professor James F. Tracy, “The Sandy Hook School Massacre: Unanswered Questions and Missing Information” (Global Research, 25 December 2012). Even NBC News has reported that there were four rather than two handguns inside the school and no long gun. There is no consistent story or coherent narrative.


The Bushmaster Hoax


Perhaps the most important point made by Niall Bradley concerned the Bushmaster, which was supposed to be the weapon that was used to slaughter 20 children and six adults as follows:

Professor Tracy observes that the report given by the medical examiner raises further questions about the weapon used, leading Tracy to question whether the man who participated in this interview was the real H. Wayne Carver or an impostor: ” . . . the H. Wayne Carver who showed up to the December 15 press conference is an almost entirely different man, appearing apprehensive and uncertain, as if he is at a significant remove from the postmortem operation he had overseen. The multiple gaffes, discrepancies, and hedges in response to reporters’ astute questions suggest that he is either under coercion or an imposter. While the latter sounds untenable it would go a long way in explaining his sub-pedestrian grasp of medical procedures and terminology.”



“With this in mind,” Tracy continues, “extended excerpts from this exchange are worthy of recounting here in print. Carver is accompanied by Connecticut State Police Lieutenant H. Paul Vance and additional Connecticut State Police personnel. The reporters are off-screen and thus unidentified so I have assigned them simple numerical identification based on what can be discerned of their voices”:

Reporter #1: So the rifle was the primary weapon?

H. Wayne Carver: Yes.

Reporter #1: [Inaudible]

Carver: Uh (pause). Question was what caliber were these bullets. And I know—I probably know more about firearms than most pathologists but if I say it in court they yell at me and don’t make me answer [sic]—so [nervous laughter]. I’ll let the police do that for you.

Reporter #2: Doctor can you tell us about the nature of the wounds. Were they at very close range? Were the children shot at from across the room?

Carver: Uhm, I only did seven of the autopsies. The victims I had ranged from three to eleven wounds apiece and I only saw two of them with close range shooting. Uh, but that’s, uh y’know, a sample. Uh, I really don’t have detailed information on the rest of the injuries.

[Given that Carver is Connecticut’s top coroner and in charge of the entire postmortem this is a startling admission.-JT]

Reporter #3: But you said that the long rifle was used?

Carver: Yes.

Reporter #3: But the long rifle was discovered in the car.

State Police Lieutenant Vance: That’s not correct, sir.

Unidentified reporter #4: How many bullets or bullet fragments did you find in the autopsy. Can you tell us that?

Carver: Oh. I’m lucky I can tell you how many I found. I don’t know. There were lots of them, OK? This type of weapon is not, uh … the bullets are designed in such a fashion that the energy—this is very clinical. I shouldn’t be saying this. But the energy is deposited in the tissue so the bullet stays in [the tissue].

In fact, as Tracy observes, the Bushmaster .223 the Connecticut police finally claimed was used in the shooting is designed for long range field use and utilizes high velocity bullets with a muzzle velocity of 3,000 fps, the energy of which even at considerable distance would penetrate several bodies before finally coming to rest in tissue. The whole school should have had rounds coming out of the walls and exiting the building, after going through the victims. Possibly not the outer wall, if it was brick; but drywall? Those bullets would have been hitting homes around the school had the Bushmaster been used–another proof the “official account” is a sham.


The inquiry of Allan Rees


I received an inquiry from Allan Rees of noliesradio asking if I could review a view he has archived showing an officer unloading a weapon from the trunk of the car:

Hi Jim,

Can you view the first video in our post here and determine whether or not the Bushmaster was retrieved from the trunk of Adam’s vehicle? If it was the Bushmaster, the official story hits the brick wall. I can see the clip in the video. Also what is the officer doing to the gun? Is what he is doing characteristic to a bushmaster rather than a shotgun or other rifle?

YouTube - Veterans Today -

As a former Marine Corps officer who used to supervise marksmanship training, I studied the video and replied with my observations about what could be seen, in relation to the handgrip or magazine (which extend from the bottom of the weapon) as opposed to the carrying handle (which extends from the top):


My observations:

(1) It looks like a Bushmaster, because the handgrip is visible in some of the frames.

(2) He is ejecting rounds from the chamber, which appear to be of a small caliber.

(3) Shotgun shells would be much, much larger and very obvious upon ejection.

I recommend obtaining confirmation, but this appears to have been the Bushmaster.


P.S. I am going to contact some friends confirm my observations.

Shotguns are more familiar than assault weapons, but here is a photograph to illustrate their typical size and shape, along with a sample of a few shells, which are obviously MUCH LARGER than .223 rounds:

The person I contacted for a second opinion was Dennis Cimino, with whom I have authored articles here on Veterans Today and elsewhere. Dennis has extensive military experience and is one of the smartest men I have ever known at sorting out what is really going on when it comes to covert ops:


I blew [some of these frames] up pretty large, going too much bigger yields too much pixellation to do much with the shot then but this is clearly an assault rifle not a shotgun. The ammo on the cement behind the vehicle looks to be most likely to be .223 ammo, but that’s just a guess as those surely are not SHOTGUN shells.

So, for what it’s worth, I decree this is the assault rifle here in the trunk, and if it was in the trunk, how could it have been used in any shooting unless the ‘dead’ shooter got up and put it into the trunk after he killed himself???

I was initially puzzled there was no carrying handle of the weapon in the trunk, so I checked it out and fond that Bushmaster makes several versions that do not have carrying handles, some camo, some not:


Police Lt. H. Paul Vance


Something is very wrong with the role of Connecticut State Police Lieutenant H. Paul Vance, who, as the extract from the interview reflects, denied that the Bushmaster was found in the trunk of the car rather than beside the body. I strongly suspect that he was the officer who unloaded the magazine at the time, which has raised additional questions about his competence and role, which Dennis has expressed:

If any of the so called ‘victims’ that died were with .223 rounds in them, that it’s impossible for the shooter who offed himself at the scene to have also carried this weapon to the car and put it into the trunk.The handling of the weapon is absolutely not being done by a trained law enforcement official, to be frank about it, they would not have handled the weapon like that before it got taken to a forensics lab and had the prints taken from all of the handled parts of it.

No cop investigating a crime scene would handle it like that. And it’s too thick to be a shotgun so it’s an assault rifle. whether it’s the same one in your pictures is not clear, the weapons has a multi round magazine, why didn’t the ahole eject that before cycling the rounds out thru the weapon like that, when pulling the mag out of it would have sufficed.

Very very very odd.

But handling the thing like that was outrageous. no cop would do that, which is more proof that was being done for the press, not for any investigation.

YouTube - Veterans Today -

During his press briefing, a reporter asks about the mother of Adam Lanza. The question is whether she was related to the school or if she was. Vance pauses more than a moment, then speaks at some length about the man arrested in camouflage and released (no significant details are given there, either), with nary a word about the mother. The reporters then, cleverly distracted away from the fact they didn’t hear an answer, start shouting other questions. He has deflected them. Note his slight smiles at points while he discusses the camo guy not the mother.

Vance also says to another reporter in a personal interview that the investigation will take months. But if the official story (of a lone shooter killing 20 kids and six adults) is in fact correct, why should it take “months”? Why don’t we already know? It reminds me of the Warren Commission’s having sealed its documents and records for 75 years on the grounds of “national security”, since, if its conclusion were correct (and a lone gunman had assassinated JFK), there would have been no national security issue. Before that, we hear him say the most difficult thing is when a reporter has a question that he’s not prepared to answer, “for whatever reason”.

YouTube - Veterans Today -


In a subsequent post, Dennis elaborated on the important points that he was making here:


Needless to say, it makes ZERO SENSE that the best weapon for the killing was left in the trunk of the vehicle. and could NOT possibly have been used at the school because the dead shooter couldn’t have put it back into the trunk.

Which raises the all important question: “Say, this kid shot mommy in the face 6 times with this thing that day, how many rounds did the stupid moron [officer at the trunk] eject from the still inserted magazine onto the pavement behind the weapon?”

I’m presuming that the magazine was ‘full’ though no gun owner would ever allow any weapon to be so stored as this puts a preset into the magazine feed spring, which is a bad idea all the way around. IF the magazine was ‘full’ at the house, and the kid didn’t calmly sit down and reload it again after killing mommy, that magazine would have a total capacity minus ‘6’ or however the guy fired into mommy’s face.

Another good reason for the trunk of the vehicle to have been ‘sealed’ immediately for the vehicle to be processed properly at the State’s crime laboratory for fingerprints and other clues. Once the trunk was opened on the car and it was ascertained that the trunk did not contain any obvious booby traps of any kind, the trunk should have been shut again very carefully, the trunk lid sealed by special evidence anti tamper tape across the trunk lid seal to the body, and indeed over the key opening, and the vehicle put on a flatbed and towed to the crime lab for extensive analysis.

My guess is that that was not done. But that’s exactly what should have been done when the police determined the car contained weapons not used in the shooting, obviously, least not at the SCHOOL. That car would have gone to the central crime lab there in Hartford for processing, not mucked with on location by morons.


Anti-Gun Propaganda


As I explained in “Did Mossad death squads slaughter American children at Sandy Hook?” (Veterans Today, 23 December 2012),


(1) The most likely scenario, given what we know now, is that Adam Lanza and his mother killed the day before. Adam’s body picked up by local police. He was attired in a SWAT outfit, including body armor, and stored in the school.

(2) A three-man team entered the school, one was arrested in the school–cuffed and put on the lawn–two went out the back door, one was arrested, the third appears to have escaped. You can find this on helicopter videos.

(3) Those arrested are currently not in police custody; their names were never released. That is a telling sign that we are being sold a story that is based on fiction, not on fact. What else are the local police concealing?

It now appears that they were also concealing that the Bushmaster was still in the car’s trunk, which of course means that it cannot have been the weapon responsible for slaughtering 20 children and 6 adults. If they were killed by .223 rounds, therefore, then those must have come from other assault weapons used by other shooters, which is precisely what appears to have taken place.

Nothing stands between DHS and complete domination of American than a population that is heavily armed and capable of resistance. Undermining our 2nd amendment rights by fabricated attacks–which can be arranged at will by those who control the cover operations of this nation–must be understood to be the real threat that we confront, not bizarre incidents like this one, which–even if we were to take it as the press has been reporting it–could not have been prevented by gun control.


For those still in doubt


This very peculiar event has been followed by a massive propaganda campaign to promote gun control and the confiscation of assault weapons, followed by a stunning act of censorship for pro-gun accounts:


“Facebook purges pro-gun accounts” posted on Fuk Facebook and “Facebook purges pro-gun accounts” on inforwars.com:


Facebook Purges Pro-Gun Accounts



Facebook Purges Pro-Gun Accounts

The following is a list of Facebook accounts operated by individuals in the alternative media that have been shut down by Facebook staff over the past 24 hours. Infowars writer Aaron Dykes and political dissident Brandon J. Raub have also had their accounts deleted. Raub was snatched by police and forcibly imprisoned in a psychiatric ward earlier this year for posting political content on Facebook. Infowars editor Kurt Nimmo also had his account suspended this morning.

  1. Kurt Nimmo (account suspended)
  2. Aaron Dykes (account inactive)
  3. Brandon J. Raub (account inactive)
  4. Michael F Rivero (account inactive)
  5. Anthony J Hilder (account inactive)
  6. William Lewis (account inactive)
  7. Richard Gage (account inactive)
  8. William Rodriguez (account inactive)
  9. Infowar Artist (account inactive)
  10. We are Change (account inactive)
  11. Wacboston At Twitter (account inactive)
  12. Michael Murphy Tmp (account inactive)
  13. Robert M Bowman (account inactive)
  14. Peter Dale Scott (account inactive)
  15. Jason Infowars (account inactive)
  16. Mike Skuthan (account inactive)
  17. Packy Savvenas (account inactive)
  18. Sean Wright (account inactive)
  19. Katherine Albrect (account inactive)

It is important to stress that most of these accounts have not simply been temporarily suspended, they have been shut down completely. What could be more telling of the true significance of Sandy Hook? The American people are not even going to be allowed to debate the merits of gun control.

Dianne Feinstein

Indeed, according to the latest report, Sen. Diane Feinstein (D-CA) and her allies in the gun control movement are “going for broke”: “The definition of an “Assault Weapon” in this bill is so broad you can drive a truck through it! They’re targeting EVERYTHING — rifles, shotguns and even handguns…. If passed, Feinstein’s so-called “Assault Weapons Ban” would:


  • Ban the sale, transfer, importation, and manufacturing or 120 specifically named rifles, shotguns and handguns;
  • Ban the sale, transfer, importation and manufacturing of ALL firearms with a detachable magazine and at least one “military characteristic” — which could mean just about anything that makes a gun “look scary.”
  • Bans the sale, transfer, importation, and manufacturing of magazines holding more than 10 rounds;
  • Force owners of ALL “grandfathered” weapons to undergo an intrusive background check and unnecessary fingerprinting;
  • Force owners of ALL “grandfathered” weapons to federally register their guns after obtaining permission slip from local law enforcement showing their guns are not in violation of state or local law. That’s right. If you own a $10 magazine that’s more than 10 rounds, you’ll have to register it with the BATFE in their National Firearms Registry.

It appears that even the owners of supposedly “grandfathered” firearms will be treated like common criminals, which leaves little room for doubt that Sandy Hook is being used to as a snare to confiscate “guardians of men”.


The Incoherence of Sandy Hook


My [Dennis Cimino’s] thoughts on this whole thing go in this direction: given all of the ‘fakery’ and ‘faked dead identities’ of the 9/11 fiasco, one thing comes to mind about the teachers telling the children being led out of the school: “Cover your eyes and close them” or something to that effect. Granted, you would not want children to see that kind of death, but had that been the case, it would have been possible to cover some of the more ‘messy’ victims up so that the exiting children didn’t have to see them as they walked out of the school.


Furthermore, a staged shooting event would even to a child seem ‘nonsensical’ and ‘surreal’ say if any of the so-called ‘dead’ just happened to be breathing or moving still, as it is fully possible that IF this was staged, they didn’t just use crash test dummies for corpses.so there is some doubt in my mind about the veracity of the ‘deceased’ children and the teachers. We know many dead from 9/11 never existed…were created by the government to get people to feel so sorry for them.


This thing possibly was either one of these two possibilities: (i) fully staged and faked, based on the press conference and the ‘read the card’ and the smirking [grieving father’s] face in that video; or (ii) was done by the moss*d with EFF BEE EYE help and the State Police helping, because the handling of the weapon in the trunk of the car is totally COUNTER to what any REAL law enforcement people would have done with that weapon.


Per the comments, you don’t wipe down or manhandle a murder weapon under any circumstances, and if you must pick it up you do so in a fashion that ensures that minimal interference with fingerprints will occur when you do lift it up. using wire or other means to bring it out of the trunk would be the preferred method, certainly with latex gloves on so as to not impart the officer’s prints at the very least.


So based on the [grieving father] at the press converence being told ‘just read the card’ and all the other nonsense, this was staged. How staged is anyone’s guess. My gut tells me that there could be truth in the fact that the shooter killed his mom and himself at the house and then treasonous scum decided to exploit it and then stage the rest in the following day to make it a GUN GRAB EXTRAVAGANZA here, [which, between Obama and those who salivate over gun-control, even though it makes us completely vulnerable to DHS, as I have explained in “Homeland Security: Preparing for Massive Civil War”.]


Moreover, if this was the weapon MOMMY had that son killed mommy with, before going to the school, it certainly would have a paper trail that shows MOMMY BOUGHT THIS gun. And if sonny boy toted it to school, he intended to use it. it had a much higher firing rate than any semi-automatic pistol would have, much more deadly and accurate to kill with [assuming he had the physical ability to handle it and aim and fire with accuracy], and to be honest, under any coat easily concealed if the barrel were allowed to be tucked under a waist band of pants before going into the building.


The semi-automatic pistols, for which a round is automatically loaded with each shot fired, but where, unlike automatic weapons, rounds are not continuously fired as long as the trigger is depressed and the magazine remains loaded] would have been backups, one in each coat pocket with the assault weapon being the main weapon for the killing. Being that this, the Bushmaster, of all the guns had to have had a federal background check involved, as do all guns in most states, MOMMY had to have purchased it. even if she paid cash for it there should be a store record. But those records have not surfaced and the latest we have is Adam Lanzo was not out practicing the use of the Bushmaster or any other firearm.


One can only ask one’s self, How many more FALSE FLAG MURDERS will the American public tolerate being carried out against it by it’s government? We tolerated Ruby Ridge. We tolerated WACO. We tolerated OKC. All of these were mass murders carried out befor 9/11/2001, and when that happened, with all the evidence that exists to support it indeed was carried out by THIS VERY GOVERNMENT, we again, eleven years out now, have TOLERATED IT…

But unlike most wounds, the festering wounds of Ruby Ridge, of WACO, of OKC, and in fact, the 1993 WTC ‘false flag’ blamed on a blind Egyptian when it was again the FBI involved in that, are just way too many excuses being handed to the leadership of this nation…. And the distrust, and the deep in the psyche ‘knowing’ that the government did this to it’s own people, means the wound will fester until the gangrenous tissue is too far gone and the Republiic is destroyed by the rotting flesh of LIE AFTER LIE AFTER LIE.

This nation cannot tolerate any more of this. We have indeed reached that moment when, in fact, truly, once and for all, “ENOUGH IS GODDAMNED ENOUGH!!!”

And I do mean, ENOUGH!!!

Postscript on Mind Control


Here are some resources on mind-control and other psy ops in this gun-control saga:


Jim Fetzer, a former Marine Corps officer, is McKnight Professor Emeritus at the University of Minnesota Duluth.

Dennis Cimino, who has extensive engineering and support experience with military electronics, predominantly US Navy Combat Systems, was the Navy’s top EMI troubleshooter before he went to work for Raytheon in the 1980s.


Related Posts:

The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT, VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians, or the Veterans Today Network and its assigns. LEGAL NOTICE - COMMENT POLICY

170643AFVC Veterans Holidays Banners_728x90
Posted by on May 1, 2015, With 71331 Reads Filed under Investigations, Sandy Hook, WarZone. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

38 Responses to "Sandy Hook: Huge Hoax and Anti-Gun “Psy Op”"

  1. LoPhatt  January 16, 2013 at 7:01 pm

    Everyone has keen observations and plausible ideas. For me the maddening part is that we probably will never know what happened there. Just to be clear, that DOES NOT mean that I think it was anything close to as described. It may be fun to speculate, and it is, but, our only guide is our own sense of reality and how this plays against it.
    I think its fair to say that the “unreality” part of this is probably deliberate. People get used to things by exposure and what’s weird today becomes “normal” tomorrow. This applies to just taking the “MSM’s” word for things with no evidence. “duay’s” comment is important. Would you expect them to just let the victims lie there without rushing them to the nearest hospital? I wouldn’t. After all, if people were really shot there wouldn’t that lend an air of authenticity to this?
    Why would the coroner examine them at the site? Who pronounced them? And, as I’ve said before, how can an entire town be so quiet about this?
    You can provide bits and pieces of evidence but its hard to bridge those gaps. I find it absolutely unbelievable that someone who lost a child would be doing interviews and smiling as we’ve seen. Of course, there may be some coercion there as mentioned above. If they all belonged to some satanic/pedo thing it would actually make more sense than the official story.
    As “Raptor” says, something very strange happened. Of course the obvious gun grab motive is there, but that doesn’t really explain the whole thing. It has that “ritual” overtone. Is the whole town into this? Are we to believe that all the people living there would just remain silent with all these unanswered questions and strange behavior?
    I’m sure a good investigator could turn up a lot of information. This would take cooperation on a big scale. While most are pretty brain dead, not everybody is. There isn’t going to be a trial. Whatever information they release will be sketchy and designed to deceive. The lesson they will take away is “look what we can get away with now”.
    Look at what we’ve been “shown” about this. Distant shots of scenes. Staged interviews. No blood, bodies or bullet holes. No follow up to anything. This thing has “turned a corner” in terms of selling a story. “Faith-based news”, just trust us and shut up. To question is heresy.
    Don’t you think people would be demanding (not asking) for answers? If I lived there I would be. If I were scared I’d be thinking of leaving. Then I’d be able to talk. The silence is deafening.

  2. raven  January 16, 2013 at 12:40 pm

    Lots of good research guys. I’d like to add a couple of cents. One is from a comment I found at the bottom of a blog pointing out something strange about Robbie Parker, and questioning whether Sandy Hook was entirely a hoax. While the commenter did not respond to my follow up query, the more I’ve thought about their comment, the more it reveals. It begins: “My family knows the parkers personally. They moved here 8 months ago and we attend church with them. He is not acting and yes, their beautiful daughter Emilie is now buried…” Now this could be anything from completely legit to complete disinfo at this point.

    But it goes on a few lines and then says, “He hadn’t even had time to process anything yet. This is a beautiful family that became collateral damage for the argument over gun control. MSM version is onlywhat you are supposedto think happened that day. But yes, these women & children died for politcal agendas…”

    Now, a shill would first of all not be questioning the MSM version, for one. The fact that this writer points to gun control as the motive of the killings points to his savviness of at least some of what actually went down. But it has slowly dawned on me that it points to the victims’ families also likely being hip to what is going on. This could explain a lot of things, including the acting. (It is hard to imagine anyone cooperating with the killers of their children, unless they were compromised by their own participation in pedophilia networks and satanic practices, which apparently in Newtown is a distinct possibility.) In any case, it might explain the very bad acting, if people were under duress, but still did not wish fully to cooperate.

    A Betty Ong “Flight Ten” flare.

    • Raptor  January 16, 2013 at 3:03 pm

      raven……nice post and I appreciate the pedo possibility, I mentioned that in another post or another thread here on the VT devoted to the Sandy Hook thing…

      Great line about the parents and possibilities …….Yes I completely concur in regard to being hip….this will eventually have to be dealt with in some manner, time will tell.

      I put up a post today about the Mother involved, it was moderated and yet to be tacked up..I’ll not repost it but it points out the death certificate, her cremation on 19 Dec in Mass as opposed to burial ( as first reported ) in New Hampshire ….

      Something very very weird happened up there in Newtown, something yet to be researched, uncovered and discussed.

      There are many false leads, fake sites, and far too many people claiming that the event was 100% fake for my liking. Almost if that in and of itself is a total set up, just waiting for someone to trip the snare and bag the CT’s all in one basket…

      Serious question: Any parents of murdered children sill in their 20’s? Is everyone involved ( parents ) older more mature people?


    • raven  January 24, 2013 at 11:51 am

      Thanks. The nearby FEMA drill is a smoking gun: government operation, case closed on that. Lanza’s SSDI death record attesting to his dying on the 13th seems very telling as to how it went down on that end. Mother was away until evening of 13th. Mother’s death recorded by SSDI as on 14th.

      Haven’t considered the parents’ ages. Actors were definitely sought for the Sandy Hook area prior to the event. But were they all actors, or were there a few plants, or what? As you say, the level of the hoax versus slaughter (either/or/both) is yet to be determined. I would say my consideration of the possibility that fewer or no children died has risen a bit in the last day or so. As someone has astutely pointed out, there were no hysterical parents witnessed anywhere!

      Christopher Rhodes was named in an fb comment as one of the men arrested on site, whose plates were on the car, and is a convicted pedo. I have no idea of the legitimacy of this claim as of yet, but it is a big claim for sure.

    • raven  January 24, 2013 at 2:14 pm

      Rhodes looks like simple disinfo.

  3. duay khwaam nap theuu  January 15, 2013 at 8:53 pm

    As someone with extensive combat experience and also as a medic, none of this stuff looked realistic to me. Where were the INJURED children?

    I’ve been in the ER for 5 years and we get ALL code blue patients. We get 80 year old nursing home patients that have not been breathing for 20 minutes with no chance of survival into the ER. And we perform cpr and necessary medical intervention with the chance that patients may regain a pulse.
    End quote

    Here is why you have MEDICAL personnel check out victims:


    “Shortly after they arrived on Meadowthorpe Avenue about 6:21 p.m. Wednesday, Lexington police found Umi Southworth lying in the bushes behind her home. Southworth, 44, had been assaulted, and her injuries were so bad that responding officers thought she was dead, according to initial accounts from police.

    “It wasn’t until 9:05 p.m. that the coroner was called. Two hours later, investigators determined Southworth was alive, said Fayette County Coroner Gary Ginn.

    “That nearly five-hour gap in time fueled questions throughout the day Friday about Lexington police’s response to what is now being investigated as a homicide. Southworth died Thursday at University of Kentucky Hospital.”

    Code Blue protocols for Connecticut:

    I guess they should have just left Congresswoman Gabby Giffords laying on the sidewalk…shot in the head, too!

    Given the official story and 20 kids declared dead without all the usual resuscitation protocols, you would expect at least a half-dozen angry parents to bring huge lawsuits against the Newtown officials in charge.
    Strange. Very strange.

  4. duay khwaam nap theuu  January 15, 2013 at 7:53 pm

    “The Sandy Hook Shooting – Fully Exposed”
    by ThinkOutsideTheTV 1 week ago
    It has been re-uploaded by five other youtube channels
    = 7,513,501 views total. (You have to search the title at youtube to see these numbers.)

    Something is happening.

    Research continues at a number of web venues. It’s far from sorted, but more and more people are not buying the nonsense and lies.

  5. Amanda  January 14, 2013 at 11:37 am

    Just found this posted over at TIU. I haven’t had a chance to listen yet, but I already went over to the uglytruth site and commented in agreement w/”Patty”:

    Listen to the treatment of Dr. Fetzer by Hesham Tillawi, as Dr. Fetzer TRIES to explain to Mark Glenn, Hesham Tillawi, and Michael Collins Piper, the reasons that so many people believe that Sandy Hook is not what it is being made out to be:


    This was a totally dis-graceful “interview”, and in fact, was nothing more than an ambush against Dr. Fetzer by that arrogant Tillawi, whose contempt against his callers is the precise reason that I refuse to listen to him, but I made an exception in this case. The way that Dr. Fetzer is treated is precisely the reason that more people are not coming out and speaking-up on what they TRULY believe, and all that I could think about during this ambush was what it was like for people like us in the REAL truth-movement who would call-in to shows about 911, zionism/judaism, etc., before 2007, when things started to change with the advancement of sites dealing with these issues. In 2004/2005, YOU WOULD SEE ALMOST ZERO INFORMATION ABOUT CRIMINAL jews OR 911, AND TO TALK ABOUT IT WOULD GET YOU WORSE TREATMENT THAN DR. FETZER EXPERIENCED, as almost all of you should remember; however, as the crimes have become much more blatant, and there are now many, many thousands of individual sites world-wide exposing the demons walking-on-two-legs and their cohorts, it is not “taboo” as it was to discuss and expose those doing this shit to our planet.

    I just wanted to draw a parallel to how people were treated just a few years ago, and how different the atmosphere is now that so much more is known, and so much more information is available to prove our points. This ambush-interview is like listening to someone try to explain in-consistencies regarding 911 to an asshole radio host in 2004.



  6. duay khwaam nap theuu  January 13, 2013 at 9:12 pm

    Son of key member of VP Biden’s “gun violence commission” convicted for plotting a Columbine-style murder

    Sipsey Street has learned that a key member of the President’s committee to find “the solution” to school shootings, has a son who was convicted of plotting a Columbine-style school massacre — possibly with a service pistol obtained from his father. Nee is the former head of the Boston Police Patrolman’s Association and is currently the head of the National Association of Police Organizations. In short, says one source familiar with the notoriously anti-firearm Nee, “he is a political hack/thug/activist who happens to carry a badge.”


  7. cartoonimperium  January 13, 2013 at 1:08 pm

    This article by Thomas Farrel is supposed to rebut Fetzer. It made me blush, Can they really think we are that stupid and naive to believe their “israel friendly” conspiracy theory? supported by game theory and prejudice only?


    in my opinion the MSM is talking about the conspiracy theories a fair bit, Wonder if Tracy will be “suicided”. That’s what the narrative seems to be edging towards.

  8. duay khwaam nap theuu  January 13, 2013 at 6:47 am

    110 lb vegan wonderkid trained like this, right?


  9. thorshammer1999  January 13, 2013 at 5:07 am

    It’s a gun grab; it’s that simple.

    “Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force: Whenever you give up that force, you are inevitably ruined.”
    Patrick Henry

  10. dirtus napus  January 12, 2013 at 7:05 pm

    Yeah, that’s a flat top something, looks like a Kel-tec 9mm rifle to me though. But, it can’t be because of the action. Don’t know….

  11. dirtus napus  January 12, 2013 at 6:37 pm

    Also, in ops like this, and you know this as well. The first thing you do is leak 2 or 3 stories, pieces of evidence to throw everyone off. In this case it seems to me that because they had complete control of the scene they had deputies (actors) chasing actors in the woods. This fake coverup inside the footage does a lot of damage to the “us” People will always chase these scenes as real, as 3 shooters perhaps. Although it doesn’t help TPTB, it does make sure a large segment of people like “us” chase that rabbit forever, making sure the camps are divided. IT WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN SHOWN ON TV if it didn’t have a purpose. There are other head fakes but this one will work the best in the long run.

  12. dirtus napus  January 12, 2013 at 6:29 pm

    Well done as per usual Jim. I have come across some very specific info that to me, without a doubt makes this a hoax.

    Actually one doesn’t need go any further than United Way of Conn. sending their regards to the victims families 3 days early, or other entities doing the same. There are some CIA black hole sites that also accidentally leaked public time stamps, perhaps it was done on purpose…..very damning.

    When you mention Monarch victims I’m almost sure at this point that the Monarch victims aren’t the perps (which there are none in this case), but rather the actors. To have so many actors involved, only state sponsored and protected assets like the CIA employs could be trusted to shut up when you consider how many there are involved in this.

    Now, I’m sure Aurora was MK-ultra, 0 doubt (and he didn’t fire a shot that , but the only MK I see here is the actors. Robby Parker being one, and his daughter is still alive, I have the non photoshopped pictures of Obama hugging her and laughing with State Troopers in the background, in a garage. This concerns me in relation to how many victims they must be turning out on a yearly basis.

    The footage of the scene from a helicopter is incredibly damning as well. This is not a crime scene, it’s a movie shoot. One emergency vehicle and it’s a fire truck from Detroit? Supposedly 26 dead inside and everyone is standing around waiting for something else to do. No cops, no EMT’s, nothing but actors. It’s leaked footage I believe.

    Also, watching that deputy? work the action on that rifle says to me it’s not an AR-15. That action is waaaay to long to be a bushmaster or a shotgun. I know it’s not an AK but the action is about as long as one or maybe a Galil, it’s not an SR (SA)-58 because the action is on the other side 🙂 He’s clearing rounds and it’s taking him 7-8 inches to do it from what I can see. Could be wrong, I’ll watch it again. Cheers.

  13. marqgoldberg  January 8, 2013 at 11:27 pm

    This may very well be the dumbest page on the entire internet.

  14. keithlankford  January 7, 2013 at 1:49 pm

    Emily Parkers Facebook account was set up five hours after the shootings. With bank account already set up to receive charitable donations. Before her parents even knew she was DEAD! No media will report this. This is not a negative comment about the deaths of innocent people, but a question of how this could be possible. Questions about this will be removed from the page by the 24/7 monitor, will be removed from twitter, ect. Where is the freedom of speech. Where is the Media.

  15. Amanda  January 5, 2013 at 8:42 pm

    Okay, I haven’t gotten very far into this video, but early on they play an audio from CT Gov. Malloy saying something to the effect of “We were spoken to and told to prepare for something like this happening in our state.”

    Investigating the Sandy Hook Narrative and Asking the Hard Questions

  16. CoJonesGrandes  January 5, 2013 at 4:11 pm

    Description of video:
    Sandy Hook Shooting Victim Allison Wyatt does not exist. Her photo was stolen from her mother Cathy Gaubert’s Flickr page. The girl’s name is Lily Gaubert and she is alive and well.

  17. Amanda  January 5, 2013 at 2:26 pm

    So, in addition to having parents who appear to be acting (e.g. Robbie Parker), we also have a photo of a supposedly dead child, who is, in fact, very much alive:

    PROOF SANDY HOOK IS FAKE Woman’s Daughter’s Photo used for Sandy Hook Shooting Victim

  18. Amanda  January 4, 2013 at 3:09 pm

    Here’s some interesting info that seems to suggest advanced knowledge of the situation (or maybe AP is just really good at doing it’s job?)

    from Professor James Tracey (http://memoryholeblog.com/2013/01/01/sandy-hook-the-illusion-of-tragedy/#more-1437) At 9:53AM, no more than ten minutes after the reported shooting ceased, the Associated Press published a story, “Official with Knowledge of Connecticut School Shooting Says 27 Dead, Including 18 Children.” AP and the Washington Post have since removed the story from their websites in lieu of subsequent reports that took their cue from a press conference scheduled for later that day.

    And then I just found this video that seems to suggest that AP tweeted about this at 7:30 am EST (someone familiar w/the workings of twitter will have to look into this and verify what the woman making the video is saying)

    Why did the AP Tweet Sandy Hook at 7:25AM HAPPENED AT 8:30-40AM!!!

    I also think there’s evidence of foreknowledge when looking at the info about Nancy Lanza. Early on, we were told that she was dead at the school. But, she was actually dead at her home and it seems like the police would not have had knowledge of her being dead until much later in the afternoon. The video below talks about the issue of the timing of announcements about Nancy Lanza being dead:

    Adam Lanza & Mom Murdered! Sandy Hook Shooting in Newtown, CT, Best Conspiracy Theory Part 1

    In the video above, they indicate that Nancy Lanza’s home was raided at 2pm (though she was announced dead much earlier). Here is where they got that info:


    Also kind of interesting, if you scroll down in the article above, there’s a photo w/sheeting on the ground, surrounded by ambulances, with a few stretchers. The captions says “Chaotic scenes at the school as police work to secure the area and bodies are carried out of the school,” but if you look closely at the stretchers, I’m pretty sure those are just duffle bags w/medical supplies.

    • LoPhatt  January 5, 2013 at 1:16 pm

      Amanda, that seems to be a hallmark of these things. The stories emerge early and “full blown”. Of course, in the real world, that’s impossible. How would they know the names, details, etc.? They wouldn’t. They just read the script that somebody provides and the eaters just suck it up.
      The scene with the tarps is really the firehouse. It appears they’ve moved a school sign to give the appearance that they’re there. They aren’t. Wide shots of the area clearly show that it is the firehouse and that the emergency vehicles are all crammed in there in such a way as to be unable to move. It looks exactly like a “drill”.
      The story is that the golf cart that you see goes back and forth bringing out “victims”. Does that sound plausible? Why? They would have us believe that they went down the road and had some guy haul dead bodies through the spectators to be laid out in the parking lot for all the friends and families to see? Why not inside the firehouse? Why do this at all since the shooting stopped. They certainly don’t seem concerned about the “crime scene” as they have supposedly moved everything to a new location.
      These things are precisely why this is so deserving of interest. It is so incredibly unbelievable that, if it goes unchallenged it will become the new standard for manipulating the eaters. Somehow, to question “authority” is heresy. This is “faith-based” statist-worshipping manipulation. Your “obligation” is to believe. The more unreal the story and the stronger the belief and outrage at anyone who questions their masters the better job they’ve done.
      Be adults people! These people have an agenda and it involves manipulating you. Don’t be manipulated. Demand answers. Don’t be intimidated.

  19. Yukon Jack  January 4, 2013 at 2:45 pm

    Obama might be just like GW Bush who was reading “My Pet Goat” book upside down at the Booker gradeschool when 911 went down, he was in a photo op during 911 so he could feign uninvolment, but 911 truthers outed him because if there was a real terrorist event then the secret service would of immediately whisked him away.

    Well Obama is putting out this bullshit that “it was the worst day of his presidency” when he was told about the Sandy Hook shooting. Really? That is not believable since Obama has ordered drone strikes that have killed thousands of children, whole families, mothers holding kids, etc. Obama is without a conscious, a psychopath, for him to get upset about Sandy Hook is not credible, even at the post Sandy Hook speech he faked emotions and faked wiping away tears.

    What is a proven actor and liar, what Obama is really doing is feigning non involvement in the Sandy Hook shooting, just like GWBush he is providing himself with an alibi when in all probability Obama ordered the Sandy Hook psyop as a staged event and part of the larger Bolshevik style gun grab.

    (And it was a psyop, no one died, at the wake of Emilie Parker she is shown still alive.)

    Note: The daily mail is a zionist rag, a MSM Talmudic whore press, birdcage lining and something to wrap your fish and chips


    “The worst day of my presidency’: Barack Obama receives the horrific news about the shootings at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn.”

  20. Yukon Jack  January 4, 2013 at 2:43 pm

    Obama orders the Sandy Hook hit then feigns being upset.

    Obama might be just like GW Bush who was reading “My Pet Goat” book upside down at the Booker gradeschool when 911 went down, he was in a photo op during 911 so he could feign uninvolment, but 911 truthers outed him because if there was a real terrorist event then the secret service would of immediately whisked him away.

    Well Obama is putting out this bullshit that “it was the worst day of his presidency” when he was told about the Sandy Hook shooting. Really? That is not believable since Obama has ordered drone strikes that have killed thousands of children, whole families, mothers holding kids, etc. Obama is without a conscious, a psychopath, for him to get upset about Sandy Hook is not credible, even at the post Sandy Hook speech he faked emotions and faked wiping away tears.

    What is a proven actor and liar, what Obama is really doing is feigning non involvement in the Sandy Hook shooting, just like GWBush he is providing himself with an alibi when in all probability Obama ordered the Sandy Hook psyop as a staged event and part of the larger Bolshevik style gun grab.

    (And it was a psyop, no one died, at the wake of Emilie Parker she is shown still alive.)

    Note: The daily mail is a zionist rag, a MSM Talmudic whore press, birdcage lining and something to wrap your fish and chips


    “The worst day of my presidency’: Barack Obama receives the horrific news about the shootings at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn.”

    Yeah right! Liar! You order this psyop as part of a gun grab even before you were sworn in a 2nd time.

  21. Raptor  January 4, 2013 at 12:27 pm

    I listened to both segments of Mann’s interview on the sgtreport.com site…..He’s only asking the common sense questions many here have asked…..like the one I posed early on..Logistics and the fact that a soaking wet 110 lb kid was able to carry that much gear and use it in such a manner…Mann say’s it’d be hard for him at 5 ‘9″ 200lbs trained up and all. He’s reaching there but you get the idea.

    In my opinion this kid wasn’t capable.

    Pisses me off people simply swallow this stuff without even one intelligent question..This kind of stuff must stop…

    Who leaked the initial storyline????????/ Where is this person and WTF is he/she working for?


    • LoPhatt  January 4, 2013 at 11:56 pm

      I agree. It is inevitable that people are asking the “common sense” questions. The cops “revelations” really aren’t. He does mention some things that have already been mentioned here. But again, that is understandable since it just stinks to high heaven.
      It really is hard for me to understand how they botched this so badly unless its intentional. I won’t offer a reason for that but I can think of a few possibilities. It is proof positive of “media” complicity. I don’t have any problem with people speculating. Its interesting and, frankly, we don’t know what happened.
      Like the “9-11 Movie”, you know it isn’t true as described. People get into arguments over their theory of what precisely happened. That’s nuts. I say, if you have a theory, get it out there. Some of the goofiest ones contain a grain or two of possible truth.
      The fact is, as much as we’d like to see this exposed, it’ll never happen. We may get a bit here and there, but no one is going to say “I’m busted, you caught me”. They will do what they always do when their lies are exposed, lie some more.
      One thing that I can’t get over with all these types of incidents is that you know several people KNOW they are lying. I mean those who were there. I understand fear but, you would think somebody would eventually blow the lid off.
      Like the cop said, it is unusual not to have shots of the inside of the room or the door, etc.. It is “high drama” and the TV production people love it. The “no one saw the bodies” is equally hard to swallow. By now thousands of people have seen the license plate, etc. and somebody has access to run it. Several other issues should be available in the public records. I don’t expect the MSM to do this, I expect someone with access to do this.
      We know very little about the major players here. In real life we would have been bombarded with puff pieces and life histories of these people. They can’t be afraid of Lt. Porky.
      It is true that people are gullible. They shouldn’t believe everything they read but it doesn’t hurt to see it. There may be some small clue hidden in there. Often their conclusions are wrong but some of what brought them to those conclusions is priceless.
      If you go back and listen to the audio of the police radio from the Aurora shooting for example, and all the witness statements, it would take absolute willful ignorance to believe the official story. As you know, you can say that about all of these “events”. I think its pretty clear that they get away with it. Even if a lot of people know its bogus, what are they going to do about it?
      One possible theory is that by doing that they spread a sense of hopelessness. Another is that it helps to identify how successful the “dumbing down” process has been. The message is “we’re in charge and its going to be like this”. Most know something is very wrong, whether they admit it or not. You see them look over their shoulder when discussing it to see if anyone is listening. That’s pretty telling.
      I admit to being interested in this. The more we find out the clearer picture will form. A lot of these questions shouldn’t be too hard to get answers for. If Adam Lanza is real and truly disabled there will be records. There would be records about the parents and their divorce. There would be records about the brother. Somewhere in there is a clue as to why they were singled out (real or imaginary).

  22. Raptor  January 4, 2013 at 5:22 am

    Man…..this isn’t rocket science. The plates are different…the plate on the vehicle found at the school reads..
    872 YEO…..Like I posted..pages back….any LE here can easily run this plate and verify registration via BMV

    I’ve had this done a few times before, simple.

    Read a news article yesterday which was written on the 16th….it is a must read for anyone seeking the truth…Much of it is now in question…..planning on contacting the author/reporter and see what he has to say in regard to how he obtained and fact checked his piece.

    you can find it at courant.com written by Edmund H Mahony and Dave Altimari
    title: Methodical Massacre: Horror and Heroics

    Like I sad: Must read, lots of interesting things…like how these writers claim that Soto tried to direct Lanza away from her class when Adam supposedly asked ” where are they ” in reference to the children in her class.

    Claims to have gleaned this from police who got it from the students themselves who had been in the room and survived. Yet I thought that Police had yet to interview anyone especially students so traumatized by the event…….written on the 16th…..so any questions??


  23. Amanda  January 3, 2013 at 11:53 am

    Okay, looks like there’s been an update to the information on the black honda being reigistered to Chris Rodia. This seems to suggest that some sort of mistake was made by the person who posted the police recordings:


    • LoPhatt  January 3, 2013 at 10:08 pm

      Of course the problem with this “correction” is that it doesn’t make any difference if he was “50 miles away” or 100. The plate is the same and is still registered to Rodia. In fact, there is a picture of it on the tow truck with a “Sandy Hook” sign in the background.
      One way to clear this up is to go to an insurance site and pretend to be inquiring about insurance. They ask for the license number and, poof, it comes up whoever is the registered owner. We think we know that Nancy Lanza had a BMW. What other cars did she have?
      There is also a woman who claims that someone boosted a picture of her daughter off of Facebook and posted it as a murdered child. She says that she’s very much alive and well. Believe it or not I don’t have much of a problem believing that the local cops have had this taken from them. I do have a hard time believing they’d keep their traps shut if there were no victims. Again, who knows?
      There have got to be dozens of loose ends out there that would tell the tale. They can bottle it up and control information but not totally. One of the “unintended consequences” of living in a police state is that there is simply too much information out there to contain completely.
      Right now they are in “stone wall mode”. They can’t afford to start answering questions about this. I don’t know how it is where you live but I have a hard time believing that locals there aren’t wondering about all this. Where I’m at we often get the official story and know it’s a lie. I can’t imagine how they are containing this.
      Little by little more and more comes out. Of course it all can’t be real. One of their local stations said they couldn’t find any information on Adam Lanza. That is simply not possible, if he existed. It is also telling that we’re not seeing the usual phoney investigative journalism that usually accompanies these things. One would think that they don’t want to steer the conversation away from the target consequence.

  24. Raptor  January 3, 2013 at 8:26 am

    Read through the link, thanks for that info. However, many, if not all of those ideas can be debunked quite easily. Yet I understand how all of these scenarios have come about as well as why they continue to grow legs.

    Try this, just consider it with a clear conscience and open mind. NO OFFICER who is a real officer would ever not know the difference between .223 rifle casings and 9 mm casing, IT’S AN ABSOLUTE IMPOSSIBILITY.
    So you must ask yourself this very simple yet important question: Who was it that made the initial claim which was subsequently reported by the media in regard to the weapons both found and used? WHO….and better yet….WHERE is this anonymous source? The one who was reported to remain so because they were not cleared to offer such information in the first place???? Think about it before running for the goal line.

    Second the car in question: Back a ways I posted a brief thought about how ” MAYBE ” someone here possibly reading the posts MIGHT have the ability to RUN THAT TAG….Never any response, yet i can guarantee that it was read and thought of……their is a very obvious and equally clear op going on where and when it comes to the FACTS of this shooting, or supposed shooting…

    The leak of the car business was reported to have come over regular scanner feed and was the result of a routine traffic stop in that general area. Ever listen to a scanner? This can easily be corrected by the CSP but another simple yet important question:….Why have they yet to correct any of the obvious misinformation directly associated with this case?

    If they are to be the sole provider of the real facts of the case, WHY will they not correct the record?

    Two other important factors are the Facebook pages and the obvious presence of Military type trained, or tier 1 personnel all over the area…. I say something is really fishy about that whole scene.

    Not buying the fake staged angle……just too many people to keep in line in order to pull it all off as some would have people believe….. I think the shoot was real, only not as scripted by those initial anonymous sources…..those about the weapons and about the Principal’s account as reported by the Bee.

    A line of thought: What is going to become of the dozen or so officers that are supposed to be too traumatized to return to duty? Has there been any real effort to interview ANY of them?


  25. Amanda  January 2, 2013 at 9:15 pm

    Also, here’s a crazy question: how do we actually know Adam Lanza’s body was even found in Sandy Hook Elementary?? Did anyone see him there (I’m pretty sure we were told he was wearing a mask)? And how did he actually get to the school. At first the MSM gave the impression that he drove his mother’s car tehre. But, as it turns out, the car we were told was Lanza’s was actually registered to Chris Rodia, a drug dealer from Norwalk. So, are we to assume that Adam Lanza, who has no history of violence or criminal behavior also stole a car? Were the keys to Chris Rodia’s car found on Adam Lanza’s body? Has it even been verified that Adam Lanza knew how to drive and earned at CT driver’s license?

  26. Amanda  January 2, 2013 at 8:51 pm

    Okay, so I was listening to an archived show w/Rick Adams and Dr. K (RBN) and learned this interesting piece of info:

    Adam Lanza was a vegan
    He didn’t want to hurt animals

    http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/adam_lanza_was_a_vegan/ (video at link)

    It was a shared love of live music that sparked a close friendship between Russ Hanoman and Nancy Lanza more than five years ago. Now, in light of the tragedy at Sandy Hook and recent reports suggesting she was a paranoid survivalist, Hanoman is speaking publicly about the woman he knew. As he told PIX 11, “She was a wonderful, beautiful, elegant woman who loved life, and most importantly she loved her son, Adam.”

    Another small detail emerged in the course of the interview, this time about Adam Lanza.

    Lanza was vegan, according to Hanoman, because he “didn’t want to hurt animals.”


    Also, if you watch the video, they again show you that shot of the firehouse, but it has a sign “Welcome to Sandy Hook School” and they seem to be trying to give the impression that that’s actually the school. And, for what it’s worth, somewhere in the audio w/Rick Adams, Dr. K was talking about how he actually called the Newtown Police to talk about the discrepancies in the offical story. He said the guy he spoke (he didn’t give a name) said something about how the discrepancies weren’t coming from them, but were coming from the federal govt, which kind of took over (or something to that effect) (I was kind of surprised that Dr. K apparently called the Newtown Police–I was kind of under the impression that independent “journalists” were supposed to stay away from this)

  27. CoJonesGrandes  January 2, 2013 at 4:25 pm

    Clif High said that the TPTB are in trouble because we are becoming alert to the evil deeds that they do to us. He said we are like the peasants who watch out for the lords coming round to raid us and rush to man the barricades and throw stones.

    Re: the conspiracy theory which links the Aurora shootings with the Batman movie and Sandy Hook. A blogger claims that the map in the movie indicates that Narrows is the next target. He/she did a search for ‘Narrows school’ and found one in Virginia.

    Someone living in Narrows read the blog and pushed the panic button and the school is now taking extra precautions. LOL! People are taking conspiracy theories seriously.


    The blog has mysteriously disappeared but there is a Google cache at:
    Save it so we have a record of it.
    The blogger posted this on why we are given prior notice of their evil deeds:
    “One of the readers left a comment and directive to research: “Why the Illuminati telegraphs their moves.” Out of curiosity I located the page and began to read it. The author highlighted the answer is in the Kabbala. These curses are known as “Pulsa Dinura” and they must be made known in order to manifest in the physical realm. Is this why YouTube is replete with video analysis of movies which accurately predicted a killing event in reality? “

  28. Amanda  January 2, 2013 at 2:32 pm

    Here are some really good articles on Sandy Hook:


    The one here is a MUST READ b/c it includes a screenshot of an RIP Facebook page for Emilie Parker that was created in 2011!!! http://memoryholeblog.com/2013/01/01/sandy-hook-the-illusion-of-tragedy/

    Plus, Kevin Barrett interviewed Professor Tracey yesterday–the audio is posted here: http://noliesradio.org/archives/55640

  29. Raptor  January 2, 2013 at 12:15 pm

    Now the CSP are saying that they may reconstruct the parking lot scene due to finding bullets holes in three vehicles parked in the school lot on the day of the shooting. WTF….First arriving officers may have been shot at by Adam through the classroom windows, but said officers ( none that have been interviewed ) claim to know whether they received fire or not…..I swear this is one very bad hatchet job, almost beyond belief.

    Current word on the street is that some within LE itself are beginning to ask some serious questions via the investigation angle. Why hasn’t the CSP corrected the previous misinformation in regard to this case? Why haven’t they explained what happened to the Van, or the ones they had down and cuffed?

    Why the obvious show of force if the only one responsible had shot himself in the head and the immediate threat was already over? SWAT/Military…Seems CT has a history of employing what they call Aux Officers..


  30. Raptor  January 1, 2013 at 12:35 pm

    Brian Assanowicz >>> Thanks for your thoughts, much appreciated, especially the hands on firearm experience, invaluable given the circumstance. I must agree with your assessment of the weapon said to be found in the trunk on that car. I initially thought it to be an 870 express tactical, certainly not AR Platform .223 or other similar….one thing is how the person in the clip is clearing the weapon, notice his left hand wrapped around the weapon. Very odd technique, almost as if he’s grandstanding the weapon.

    Anyway here’s a great article written on 16, Dec, 2 days after the event…. In it Vance claims that they recovered a shotgun from the vehicle in question. This is the article that goes a long way in showing how badly botched this whole thing was right from the very first jump.

    Obviously if the Coroner said death via .223 then that in the truck must have been something else!!! That’s why the person was handling it barehanded….it was just another aspect of the ruse….

    I call him a person because he’s not LE…..That much I know for sure…..more likely polished military akin to tier 1. as are those looking on….but what would they be doing they anyway! Just my humble opinion…..I may be completely off base….but if he’s LE he’s butchering potential evidence to heel and back..



You must be logged in to post a comment Login

From Veterans Today Network