Jim Fetzer, a former Marine Corps officer, has published widely on the theoretical foundations of scientific knowledge, computer science, artificial intelligence, cognitive science, and evolution and mentality.

McKnight Professor Emeritus at the University of Minnesota Duluth, he has also conducted extensive research into the assassination of JFK, the events of 9/11, and the plane crash that killed US Sen. Paul Wellstone.

The founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, his latest books include The Evolution of Intelligence (2005), The 9/11 Conspiracy (2007), Render Unto Darwin (2007), and The Place of Probability in Science (2010).

View Latest Posts >>>

Sandy Hook Redux: Obama officials confirm that it was a drill and no children died

DISCLOSURE: The views expressed herein are views of the author exclusively and not the views of VT, VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians or the Veterans Today Network and its assigns. The views belong exclusively to author Jim Fetzer.

By Jim Fetzer (with Paul Preston as interviewed by Sofia Smallstorm)

“I have a lot of sources in regards to as to what’s going on with the president and the administration and so on, and every one of my sources said it was a false flag”--Paul Preston

Paul Preston

Paul Preston

Sofia Smallstorm, who produced and directed the documentary, “Unraveling Sandy Hook”, which many regard as the best video study of the Sandy Hook event, recently interviewed a Los Angeles school expert, Paul Preston, about Sandy Hook and his knowledge of what had transpired.

Governor Malloy had held a press conference that day, explaining that he and the Lt. Governor had been “spoken to” that something like this might happen, which raised the question, what “something like this” did he mean? Had he been told a school shooting massacre would take place? or a drill that would be presented as a real event, which appears to be what took place?

Remarkably, we now have confirmation from an unexpected source. Paul Preston had obtained information from officials in the U.S. Department of Education of the Barack Obama administration, who confirmed to him on the basis of their own personal knowledge that:

(1) it had been a drill;

(2) no children had been killed; and,

(3) it had been done to promote an anti-gun agenda.

Given his background of 41 years in the California public school system (from custodian to district superintendent) and having served as a teacher, coach, vice-principal and principal before retiring in 2012 as the superintendent of two charter schools, I thought what he had to say about Sandy Hook deserved widespread dissemination.

So when I did a two-hour show on Revolution Radio, “False Flags (9/11, Sandy Hook and the Boston bombing)” on 30 May 2014, as the third segment, I included the second 30-minutes of Sofia’s interview with Paul Preston, which is archived on “The Real Deal” and can be heard here:

False Flags: 9/11, Sandy Hook and the Boston bombing

Because Preston is also highly trained in school safety issues and had himself organized drills of many kinds, including active-shooter drills, what he has to say is especially telling.  He has a website of his own at www.Agenda21Radio.com, which he created to alert listeners to the peirls Agenda 21.

YouTube - Veterans Today -

Transcript of 30-minute clip of Sofia Smallstorm interviewing Paul Preston

Transcription by Jeannon

S  =  Sofia Smallstrom

P = Paul Preston

S – Welcome back everyone to the Speed of Light on the Pure Momemtum Network.  This is Sofia Smallstorm and we’re listening to a very interesting discussion – Paul Preston, school principal, school safety consultant, teacher, coach, and superintendent.  He has been in the California system for 41 years.  He is now retired.

So Paul, let’s continue.  Can we get a little bit into Sandy Hook now and what set off your antenna about it?

P – Well, you know I’ve been involved in many many situations at schools that have been, you know, emergency type situations and was involved even to some degree with the Columbine situation in that we had an individual who as trying to blow up the school, our school, at the time.  In a similar fashion to what was a predicted bomb threat that occurred at Columbine thee days before the Columbine shooting, and that’s how we kind of got in touch with the Columbine people.  They got in touch with us because it turned out to be a similar neo-Nazi group that was related to the Trench Coat Mafia, of all people.

And so learning and watching ad seeing all these incidences play out, all these school shootings, I took an enormous interest in because we were doing a study trying to determine because the neo-Nazis we had been working with in our school along the same time of the Columbine incident were telling us that there was going to be some big event take place.  And so our staff, myself, we all wanted to sit down and figure where this was all going to and we studied a lot of the Nazi websites and so on, and we figured out that yes, something big was going to happen.

Well then Caolumbine happened.  So we watched with a lot of intensity and under with my own circumstances and also with watching the videos and replays of the other active shooter situations, I became sort of a specialist in that and applied it to my own active-shooter training that I was doing and conducting with my own people.

S – Right. And now can we get in to Sandy Hook?

P – Well yes.  Of all the hundreds of hours that I spent watching these scenarios and investigating and reporting on them on my radio show, the first thing I noticed when I heard about Sandy Hook when I turned on the TV like everybody else – now I have always told everybody when you’re seeing these things play out in real time, the best news reporting is what’s happening in real time – that day of, you know, the moments that are around the incident. But document for yourself what’s going on because you’ll never see it again.

And the first thing that caught my eye as I was watching everything play out was the lack of intensity with which people were moving and that really disturbed me.  It hit me within the first few minutes, watching the video, the helicopters flying around and so on.  Things just didn’t seem to be right, like I would always understand in an incident command system.  People weren’t rushing around.  People weren’t panicking.  They ran that one guy off into the woods and then they arrested him.  They took him away and there was no connectedness to that.

I was also wondering why all the emergency equipment wasn’t around the school.  And I didn’t see any students either and that really bothered me.

S – So, it was almost like too slow motion for a real event.  Not enough panic.  Not enough chaos.  You had mentioned chaos earlier being a part of these real situations.  And a lot of support people rushing around like press and police but not running fast enough, not running with intensity and alarm and panic and concern, I think.

P – None of that was there.

S – Yes.  So all right, and then what did you start thinking?

P – Well, just within the first 10 or 15 minutes, it just all looked too staged to me, and I know about staging these things since I’ve staged a number of them.  And, like I said, then you stage something there’s a complete lack of intensity as you would have in a real scenario when there’s panic really taking hold of people and they’re really afraid and they’re screaming and yelling and so on.

YouTube - Veterans Today -

But the one thing that really bothered me was where were the kids.  You know they had how many hundreds of kids there at the school.  I didn’t see them.

S – Right

P – And there was lack of accounting for them.

And right away – and I’ll juxtaposition this with the situation that happened in Pennsylvania.  You saw the kids right away.  I know it’s a high school, but you know, you saw the kids right away and you saw their plan of evacuation of the school unfolding.

Now this is where it really falls apart with Sandy Hook for me.  I saw… I saw no evidence of a real plan of student evacuation taking place.  And that stuck to my head like crazy when I was in the moments watching this whole thing play out in real time.

S – That’s very interesting. No evidence of a real plan.  Because only someone… I mean everybody had their own response to it.  Some of us were already clued in from previous kinds of situations.  All this has got to be not what they’re telling us it is.  But you come from the industry, the business, and you felt that there is… I would say you knew… It probably was not even a feeling.  It was like, you know, set in stone in your head.  Where’s the plan?  I don’t see the plan playing itself out.  Right?

P – I saw same of your evacuation centers and I saw some of your colored tarps on the ground, the colored taps and so on, but even that pretty odd because normally if you have the tarps out there…in every active shooter situation you have ever see, there’s somebody on the tarp or there’s been some help that’s been given to somebody when somebody has been wounded, but none of that was even evident.  And I don’t see anybody trying to rush to anybody’s help at all in a mass casualty situation.

See, when you don’t see that…I mean…I’ll go back to the example that I have before about the 13 who overdosed.  We had people everywhere, and we had people everywhere until everybody was safe, which was 35, 40 minutes, almost an hour.  And that was never happening there at Sandy Hook.  You didn’t see the mass of people doing that.

S – Yes, it’s more like the press filled in for that missing element. The press sounded more concerned and panicked on TV as they reported but the actual participants were not so… And we got, you know, long after the fact we got the supposed 911 calls, we got various people giving their versions of it on television as they got interviewed.  But we didn’t see it on the ground.  And so how long did you watch it for?  Over a period of days, weeks? And what were your thoughts?

YouTube - Veterans Today -

P – You know, I make it a study.  I study these things intensely, and what really, what really put me over the top was the next morning with Robbie Parker going out there, and I saw that clip as it happened.  And I said there’s something really wrong here.

And that’s when I started thinking about the… the actors.  You can actually rent these actors out.  In fact that put these things up for training all the time.

And I just said ‘this is not… first of all, his demeanor was terrible.  I would never go out…and I know sometimes this happens but… to send a parent out to talk to the press in that fashion about the daughter that he just lost.  None of that seemed to be appropriate.  None of it seemed to fit.  And his behavior with the smiling laughing thing and getting into character that you could see.  I said ‘ hmmm, I’m not buying this.  I’m just not buying it.’

S – Yes, I know.  Very few other people did.  So, did you contact anyone?  Did you speak to anyone?  I don’t mean officially but in your own network of friends.

P – Yes.

S – And what were their thoughts.

P – Almost everybody was unanimous that it was a false flag.

S – And when did you start looking it up on the Internet – because I think people started posting immediately.  You know, they were making YouTubes.  The community began to express online.  So when did you start looking into all of that?

P – We – a side note to this is that I have a lot of sources in and around and in that area.  I have a lot of sources in regards to as to what’s going on with the president and the administration and so on, and every one of my sources said it was a false flag.

S – Now these are quasi-official… what kind of sources are these?

P – Let me say that there are the sources that are very close to this administration who knows what’s going on.

S – Really.  So they are really like almost insiders then?

P – Oh yes.

S – And they all… they say it was a false flag because they figured it out like you did, or they had actually factual knowledge of such..

P – They had factual knowledge of such.  That’s part of the plan.

S – I see. And so how much were they willing to tell you, and what else were they willing to tell you? Anything?

P – Oh, they told me quite a bit, and some of it I can’t reveal to you, but it fits the narrative of the anti-gun movement and the disarmament of America and that’s what the focus was.

S – And you realized that that’s part of the broader picture?  That’s the Agenda 21 society?

P – Absolutely.

S – So do you want to tell us a little but about that or do you want to stick with the Sandy Hook material?  I’ll let you decide.

P – Well, let’s go ahead with the Sandy Hook material and then we can jump into that.

S – OK, so we’re past Robbie Parker now, and what about the funerals?  You must have known then that … Did you have any concept about victims or no victims, et cetera?

P – Well, that whole thing was pretty shaky.  What was really starting to filter in in the system and was just confirming what I was already being told about these charity sites that had been developed.  By the way, they were put up the day before the shooting.  And I had gotten some screen shots, and I had confirmed with my sources.  Some of them were thinking that it was a very sloppy operation actually.

But there were reassurances to me that there really were no victims and that everything’s being staged.

YouTube - Veterans Today -

And of course the funerals to me… you go and look at the whole funeral process.  It looked like they were all staged, from the Robbie Parker one in Utah, or the Sarah Parker one with the Parker family.

And then I started getting information from people that actually had attended that funeral who lived in Utah and said that was something very funny about it.

S – Now I would like to ask you whether your sense is that these are real families even, or are they patched together?

P – Well, you know, that’s a good question because, you know, the thing that rolls around in my head, you know, the actors type of thing, you know.  You know because you can put families together and these acting programs will do that under certain training scenarios.  And so, it’s a good question.  It really is a fair question to ask whether or not they were real families.

S – And then of course because they continue to speak and organize and be called upon to comment, they have to be formed into these family groupings over time.  And remain grouped like that whether they are truly married or not.

You know, here’s one thing that I noticed.  When you see a couple, if they seem really like an odd couple, then that kind of strikes you as weird.  And I saw that.  I saw a very odd coupled-ness with lots of these Sandy Hook families.  It seemed to me, why would this person marry this person and live with them?  They’re so totally different.  That happens sometimes but in this content it really jumped out at me… myself anyway.  I didn’t know if you noticed that…

P – It’ different to say, you know, when you saw them together whether they are natural families or not.  That’s… I’m suspicious of that.  And like I say, I’m suspicious because I know that you can put these families together, you know, with some of these acting companies out there.  And that just kind of blends in with what I was already being suspicious about.

And so, there’s a lot of things that would go into the details of examining this.  And I’ve see a lot of the pictures and so on, and some of the pictures don’t match up, especially the one of the Parkers in the White House.  And it looks like to me that’s Sarah Parker sitting there that’s, you know, supposed to be a victim.

S – There’s no Sarah Parker…

P – Which one is it… maybe it’s not the Parker…

S – Oh, you mean with Obama…

P – Yes, right.

S – Emilie or Madeline …those are the two order sisters, and a lot of people felt that that was Emilie Parker leaning on Obama.

P – Yes, that was Emilie Parker…

YouTube - Veterans Today -

S – Have you seen the Super Bowl video?

P – Yes, I have seen that.

S – Well, there is a girl who looks a lot like an older Emilie Parker in that video.  So if that was Emilie at the White House, or actually I think… I don’t know if it was at the White House… but with Obama, she couldn’t be six in one picture and then just a month or two later, twelve or thirteen.

P –  Right.

S – That’s where we have to make a decision.

But what did you think of all the photographs of the children? Did you notice anything – the portraits that we were shown that these were  the victims? Did you notice anything about those portraits?

P – No, other than some of the malformations of different parts of their bodies – seemed to be a pretty obvious thing.

The whole thing… when you take a look at the totality of this, in my opinion, it’s very sloppily done.

S – Why would it have been sloppily done though?

P – Well, you know, when… and again, it’s kind of like sometimes there’s order that comes out of chaos. And when you have these chaotic situations, people want to put things back together as best they possibly can to feel more comfortable or to recover from it.  And I didn’t see any of that.  I don’t know if that makes any sense to anybody.  People don’t want to have that chaos.  They want to heal. They want to come back together.  They want to solve a problem so that they can move forward.

And that’s part of what happens when you do these drills is that you take a day or so and you talk about what happened so that you can improve upon and make it better.  People do that naturally even when there’s chaos and there’s an emergency situation because they want to seek normalcy again.

I didn’t see the same kind of emotions, if you will, or the same kind of communications between parents, kids, that you would normally see in these situations.  It just didn’t look…it looked phony to me.

S – So you mean the community itself, they did not try to repair in the organic way…?

P – I would say that is true, from the parents to the kids, to the entire community.

S – What do you think of this privacy issue that has been bandied about by the authorities, that all the privacy needs to be respected, and you can’t reveal this or that…?

P – That to me just adds more fuel to the fire because that’s not what you do in the normal situation of an incident command system.  You get the facts out because you know oftentimes when you get the facts out, you’re also looking for criminal behavior, and the more information that you can get out that that’s way, the better.

And I’m certainly not buying the notion that the parents weren’t allowed to see the kids.

S – The bodies, identifying the…

P – I just…that to me… that should be a red flag to anybody who has looked in to Sandy Hook.  The parents weren’t allowed to do that.  What’s up with that?

YouTube - Veterans Today -

S – And what did you think of the coroner’s behavior at his press conference?

P – Well there’s many things about him.  I just… I… first of all, I didn’t understand why all of a sudden there’s 26 bodies and then there’s no coroner or doctor who’s looked at the bodies and they’re declared dead.  And then all of a sudden the coroner comes out and everybody says that there was an automatic gun or a handgun that was used, and the coroner, on his own, comes out and says ‘Oh no, that was an AR-15 that was used.’

So there’s a lot of confusion, you know, about that coroner, his report, his reporting out.  Nothing seems very clear and concise to me.  And you know I would argue that, you know, as I looked at him and watched what was going on, he seemed to be just answering question on the fly without a lot of knowledge behind the questions.

S – And this suggested to you that this was a sloppily created event?

P – Absolutely.

S – And would you say that that was because of the portent of the whole thing that they… there were people involved in this… let’s say Dr. Carver, the coroner, who had some idea, if it was a scripted event, it was going to go big, and really big?  So do you think that the sloppiness of it was because in being organized, it’s very difficult to juggle how people are going to perform given that they know how big this thing could get?

P – Well, you know, what happens is that you… if you’re going to do these things and carry it through with the lie, everybody’s got to be telling the same lie at the same time all the time.

And I think with my judgments about the parents and the kids, and seeing them lie, I was seeing a big lie being perpetrated right in front of me because nothing seemed to be consistent.  And like you said, which I thought was interesting, is that oftentimes the media would fill in a lot of the blanks for you.

A classic example of the blanks comes up when you talk about where are the kids that are evacuating the school.  There were helicopters that were circling overhead.  They certainly would have been able to show, you know, hundreds of kids exiting the school.

Teacher leading students away from Sandy Hook

That was never shown.  But you did see a picture out in a parking lot, which by the way if you take a long look at this picture of all these kids being led out, about 15 or 20 kids being led out by teachers and adults from this parking lot, if you take a look at the parking lot from the aerial views, you can see that there are different cars in the parking lot in that area.  So obviously that was done during some sort of drill.  That’s my opinion.  And it didn’t match with what was going on at the time.  So nothing is matching in real time for me.  That’s just another thing.

But where are the kids?  Where were the kids?  They weren’t present.  They just weren’t there. So that’s the kind of stuff that wasn’t worked out and, you know, they were doing things on the fly.  That’s why I say… I would say it was very amateur, very amateurish as to what was going on.

S – Which is surprising because in the powers that would have designed this thing – that it would be so amateur – but…

You are familiar with the character, Gene Rosen?

P – Gene Rosen – which one was …?

YouTube - Veterans Today -

S – Gene Rosen was the man who was very close to the school and he took the kids in and offered them juice and cookies, and he gave many different… he recounted his rescuing or fielding these kids differently in many interviews.  So can you comment on that?

P – I can comment on this because this points to this proves my point that these kids… did they get off a bus?  Where did they go?  OK, I think that one of the stories was that the kids got off the bus and they made their way to his house, and there was all this panic or whatever was going on.  OK, there’s something really wrong with that picture to begin with.

First of all, when you’re doing these scenarios and this school had to have been trained for this because FEMA requires these trainings, and if you’re getting safety monies from the federal government, which every school does, they have to follow the proper protocols and that’s the proper release of the students to their parents.

S – Right.  He said, that children showed up on his lawn and they were with a bus driver, in one story.  In another story, they were just there by themselves and they were repeating babbling that there teacher was dead.  So what…would the protocol be that the children…the children, according to the story, left the school on their own.

P – Well, that to me, that’s very suspicious in and of itself.

S – Right, I mean the cops had not gotten there in the first five minutes.  Apparently some of them could still hear shooting going on, and how did the kids get out and just run down the road, you know?

P – All that seems to be… and again, I want to go into the thing about the incident command system, evacuation, walk-outs and so on.  None of that fits that protocol.  None of it.

The story of Gene Rosen or any of that stuff – None of that fits. That to me is just more evidence that there were no students other than the actor students that were there.

S – Then what was the purpose of having the Gene Rosen player?

P – Diversion.

S – From what?

P – A diversion from the other realities going on and to add more hype about the story.  It’s the same thing about the guy that was chased through the woods.  You know, they had a couple of guys that were chased through the woods.  What were they all about?

YouTube - Veterans Today -

And there were no answers about any of that, about where they came from and even my people couldn’t come up with an answer about that.  Some of my people say it was very sloppily done.

S – These are your insider people, right?

P – Right.

S – Now did you see any of the videos of the people circling through the firehouse?

P – Yes.

S – And did that strike you… what did you think of that?

P – Well, I had already come to my conclusion that this was a drill, and again, being very suspicious of the Obama administration, Diane Feinstein, Second Amendment issues, using Agenda 21 in particular, I had not see that for quite some time afterwards, maybe a couple of weeks after.

We were engaged in our own things that we were doing in terms of investigations and stuff like that.  We’re pretty intense about what we’re doing here on Agenda 21 Radio, and we have some very highly placed sources of information that comes to us and which we’re very grateful for.

I, for one reason or another, hadn’t seen that video maybe two or three weeks until after the incident.

There’s more evidence right there because what in the world were all those people doing there to begin with?  You see, if you’re doing an incident command situation, there’s a place for those people and those people can be moved on rather than seeing that circus that was going on, which is what that was.  That was all staged.

S – Right.  And these were far too many adults, no children whatsoever, no panic.  And to me the people that were there-–they weren’t dressed for December.  So some people have suggested that that particular drill, the circling in and out of the firehouse, took place a lot earlier, and it matches the time frame and the clothing of the children evacuated from the school.  They did not have their coats.

And I was going to ask you, is it normal when there’s an emergency for the teacher to evacuate the children without letting them get their coats, or would they take the extra time and say ‘Children go put your coats on as fast as you can.’  How does that work?

P – Well no.  If there’s a signal to get them out of the building – and there’s always a signal of some sort to get them out of the building safely – they go directly out. Period.  End of subject

And if they can get their coat, that’s great, but the safety thing is to get them away from where there potentially is a threat and that would be the key thing.  And again, you pointed to something else and I brought this up earlier about the drill that we used to run and people would always, you know, screw up the drill because they would knock on the door in an active shooter situation and the teacher would open the door.

Well, you know, how does that all play out?  I was looking at things pretty much in real time within minutes of news being broadcast as it was happening from a helicopter.  Now I am a real-time kind of guy. So I’m looking at maybe 15 minutes into the shooter, maybe 20 minutes into the shooter situation.  I’m looking at clear video of the campus and so on.  I’m not seeing anything happening.

Where are the kids?  The kids aren’t there.

S – Right.

P – And they should be released or what’s going on with them?

S – And there were some people said that they were in closets for up to four hours.  That doesn’t make any sense either.

P – That does not many any sense to me because what happens, and again it goes back to the police, and back to Columbine, they will go in and check every nook and cranny.  And quite frankly, I know how that’s done.  We used to do that.  We always used to look and check to see where people were.

S – Right.  And you would not miss large adults hiding in small closets.

And the idea of Katelyn Boyd and some of these teachers bundling up all their kids into the bathroom and having a few sit on the toilet… I even heard the toilet roll holder, my god, that’s pretty tough to do even for a six year old.  But what do you think of that?  That doesn’t make sense to me.

YouTube - Veterans Today -

 Sofia Smallstorm, “Unraveling Sandy Hook in 2, 3, 4 and 5 dimensions”

P – Well, you know, we tell people in an active shooter situation to seek… to hide or… if there is a shooter there to take the challenge.  We used to do these things where we had these dummy books and we’d bring in an active shooter as the stage person and throw books at them, you know, because that really throws them off. You’re taught those kinds of little techniques to throw the active shooter off.

But I can imagine some people getting holed up in a closet or something like that if they haven’t been able to lock the door.  And that’s one of the things we tell our people all of the time.  Lock the door.  And we made sure in all schools, and all schools should have the, the doors should have the inside key on them, you know, so you can use an inside key on them also as we could on the outside.

S – So we have a couple of minutes left at this first hour.  Do you have anything to say about Adam Lanza – fiction, non-fiction, real?

P – Well, just on the surface of it – and again I would throw out I’m highly specialized trained in drugs and alcohol recognition – obviously looks like he has some meds onboard just by the look.  But you know if you couch that along the same lines that that this may be a fictional event, that he’s a fictional character, which fits his description of what I see there.

And of course if you’re doing a fictionalized event like this, you want to have the most crazed individual that you can have looking at you through the picture there, and that’s exactly what you have.  That’s my speculation.  I think that’s what they wanted.  That’s what they did.

And he has a history and what is the history?  We’re not real clear on the history.  You know, first of all, they found out that he’s got his brother’s driver’s license.  Then there’s some confusion.  And you know it one of these kind of scenarios that just didn’t quite fit.

And as a school person that to me was one of the big pieces of evidence.  Why does he have his brother’s license?  And then they made contact his brother that I guess was in Jersey some place, wherever he was, and there was an investigation.  That all seemed to be tracking with me as a distraction about what was really happening at the school.

Does Adam Lanza even exist?

Click here: “Conspiracy Analyst: Does Adam Lanza even exist?”

See, the more they under this situation… this is just my speculation – the more they could distract from the actual Sandy Hook school site itself and stage things away from there, the more they could sell the story of Sandy Hook on the whole.

S – That’s a very very good point, Paul.  Excellent.  And we should add that the mug shot that they gave us of Adam Lanza was very painterly.  It wasn’t even a photo, and it did have that, you know, ghoulish expression on it to make us think this is a real lunatic.

But we are now at the end of our first hour and I really really thank you, Paul Preston, for being with us.  And we will take up a second hour discussion in the Members Section.  So this is Sofia Smallstorm thanking everyone for listening to this first hour and please do come to PureMomemtum.net and join us for the second hour in the Members Section with Paul Preston, 41 years in the public schools and someone who has been through a lot of staging of drills and has a lot of drill understanding and experience.


Related Posts:

The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT, VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians, or the Veterans Today Network and its assigns. LEGAL NOTICE - COMMENT POLICY

Posted by on May 1, 2015, With 471377 Reads Filed under Investigations, Of Interest, Sandy Hook, WarZone. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Comments Closed

87 Responses to "Sandy Hook Redux: Obama officials confirm that it was a drill and no children died"

  1. Simpsons Donkey  July 6, 2014 at 4:37 am

    Just spent a couple of rivetted hours, missed priceless prime-time peak TV viewing, lost the plots of a couple of my favorite shows (‘The Tunnel’ and ‘The Bridge’, which BOTH involve cop buddies from different EU countries solving murders together, BOTH include chicks who drive Porsches…!) See how surreal real life is getting?
    I’ve shook my head over Craft International creeps at Boston, and at Rosen, that creep, in the past — and here Dr Fetzer has wrapped it up so well.
    We will need more LSD to comprehend the oncoming waves of manufactured reality. What a blessing I received Self-Knowledge, and that the Master is here.

    • Jim Fetzer  July 6, 2014 at 5:49 am

      My guess is that you were listening to my “Caravan to Midnight” appearance with John B. Wells, which ran more than three hours on JFK, 9/11, Wellstone, Sandy Hook and the Boston bombing. Thanks for taking the time http //nwopodcast.com/fetz/media/jim%20fetzer%20real%20deal-coast%20to%20midnight.mp3

  2. Suzan M.  July 4, 2014 at 8:00 pm

    Jim – about it being a hoax – but is that new info. Can you go 1 step further – and explain the people playing roles in the hoax? Have you identified the actors?

  3. Jim Fetzer  June 30, 2014 at 8:01 am

    Anyone who has read the article on which this post poses as a comment will see through it. This guy is a shill for the CIA and the DHS who is trying to perform snow-jobs on the unwary. Virtually no one at VT is going to be taken in. But there he is, shoveling the kind of nonsense he claims that Wolfgang Halbig, Paul Preston and others are exposing here.

  4. jake gittes  June 27, 2014 at 5:08 pm

    ” It may be more beneficial if people were to focus on the Mental Health aspect of our nation right now.” – “Honeybee777”

    I think “Honeybee777” could be Gene Rosen. Their credibility is about the same — zilch — and you know the Tribe would want to get their money’s worth and make the crisis actors continue the charade as shills. Clock back in! Earn those Christmas Day Houses!

    “Mental Health Aspect.” Please. That inserted talking/agenda point is about as subtle as Rosen’s “acting.”

  5. Malakie Usn  June 27, 2014 at 3:14 pm

    I have been reading both sides of this argument For me, I am still sitting in the middle.
    Why? Because I cannot clearly answer all the questions with reasonable answers.

    1) Where are the kids in the live coverage?
    2) How do you explain the paid actors doing interviews?
    3) How do you explain the communications frequency changes and blocks?
    4) Why are no bodies EVER seen even at the funerals?
    5) Explain 5+ websites all going up with pages for the victims… DAYS before the event even occurred?
    6) Why did they so quickly bull doze the site?
    7) Is it true the school was not used and had not been for a couple years?
    8) Why would they create an event involving small children? Perhaps so they cannot talk about it later when they are older?
    9) the picture of Adam Lanza, my first thought was it was fake. to me it looked like a drawing of someone done on a computer. It does not look like a person at all.

  6. Jim Fetzer  June 25, 2014 at 3:31 pm

    Blatant post from an obvious shill. In this context, “to confirm” means to assert, to support, or to substantiate as true, which is precisely what his contacts in the Department of Education did on the basis of their own personal, factual knowledge. What else could that possibly mean? They confirmed that it had been a drill, that no children had died and that it was done to promote a gun-control agenda. Where do these people come from? What a charlatan.

  7. Stewart Ogilby  June 19, 2014 at 8:14 am

    Fetzer, I note your conclusion that I have nothing worthwhile to contribute to your work. Although most people particularly those unfamiliar with the stale material you keep trotting out as your own brilliant work may be entranced, unquestionably this being the goal of a self-proclaimed “professional philosopher”, I have the temerity to feel that you not only love to continue beating dead horses but you beat the wrong ones. You want me to apologize for my opinion? Of course, sir. Excuse me for offending your highness. The “flaws” and inside jokes built into the Sandy Hook hoax are there precisely for “discovery” and “exposure” by even the most brilliant and modest of professional philosophers. Pardon me if I am not overwhelmed. The perpetrators continue to control the discussion. You really think that the Robbie Parker interview was a mistake, for example? LOL. They are letting everyone know that they can get away with absurdity. That is the real horror of Sandy Hook

    • Jim Fetzer  June 19, 2014 at 9:04 am

      I was responding to an especially indefensible post from you. I had the impression that you had points to make in the past but, if this is any indication, I was wrong then and right now.

    • wolf  June 19, 2014 at 10:40 am

      Putting aside the disrespectful tone of this comment, a valid point may have been made. Are the perps sloppy on purpose? Maybe they don’t care how many people figure it out because they are creating ‘reality’ faster than ‘we’ can react and they calculate that they will reach their endgame before any kind of tipping point can be reached.

      Maybe it’s a perverse thrill they get by being so obvious to those with eyes to see. Maybe it’s the manifestation of unmitigated chutzpah and they are yucking it up amongst themselves. Are they playing with humanity as a matador taunts a bull or a cat toys with a mouse? Look at all the ‘mano cornuto’ hand signs they discreetly slip in…or Poppy-field Bush’s outright taunt in the Sarah McClendon interview;

      “Sarah, if the American people ever find out what we have done, they will chase us down the streets and lynch us.” (neener neener neener…catch us if you can you dumb goyim)

  8. Big Ted  June 18, 2014 at 2:56 pm

    I think Honeybee777 has been found out. These shills are getting easier to spot. They try to sidetrack the gullible with talk about “our” children and “our” families and thanking the first responders. I didn’t see the first responders doing jack. An extraordinary episode like the alleged mass murder of over 2 dozen people requires extraordinary evidence to support it. I’ve seen no such evidence…ergo no such event took place. Anyone who believes otherwise has left their brain in the john.

  9. LC  June 17, 2014 at 11:29 pm

    This guy discusses that even Wolfgang Halbig is a red herring;

    SANDY HOOK Wolfgang Halbig Is a Fraud


    @ Min. 53 Mr. Halbig asking for $100,000. handout long before Sandy Hoax to set up shop!!!

    • Jim Fetzer  June 18, 2014 at 1:47 am

      Except, of course, Wolfgang is not a fraud and has probably done more to make the public aware that all is not well with the “official account” of Sandy Hook than any other person because of his background as a former Florida State Trooper, school administrator (of 36 years) and national school safety expert . I recommend that you read my earlier article, “Wolfgang Halbig heads for Newtown in pursuit of the truth about Sandy Hook”, http //www.veteranstoday.com/2014/03/24/wolfgang-halbig-heads-to-newtown-for-the-truth-about-sandy-hook/ It was inevitable that he would be subjected to vicious attacks. But I know him and he is “the real deal”. You can listen to his very first radio interview on radiofetzer.blogspot.com.

    • Honeybee777  June 18, 2014 at 8:26 am

      Jim, you seem to have the strong characteristic of “belief” in which the sky may be blue, but if you believe it to be green, no one with any amount of data or presentation of fact will change your mind. My commentary is not for you. It is for my fellow Sandy Hook/Newtown families, friends and the community who may stumble upon your page and feel injured by your words and/or beliefs. Your beliefs do not alter the shooting and the loss of our children. Simply, what has happened, has happened and with our faith and support move forward in life. We wish you the best in yours.

    • Jim Fetzer  June 18, 2014 at 8:35 am

      No, I am a professional philosopher who spent 35 years offering courses in logic, critical thinking and scientific reasoning. The vagaries and nebulous character of your posts are dead give-aways that you are a shill and have no knowledge of any of these events. If you actually lived in Newtown, you would have known that I was there with Wolfgang Halbig and addressed the Newtown School Board. You did not know that, which means that you do not actually live in Newtown. If you could dispute the consequences of logic and evidence, you would do that; but you can’t, so you don’t. I suggest you find a venue with more gullible saps than you are going to encounter here.

    • LC  June 18, 2014 at 9:16 am

      Thanks Prof. Fetzer for your reassurance that Mr. Halbig is the real deal. I take your word for it.

      However its always good to keep eyes & ears open for potential red herrings who may slip in either as opportunists (acting for personal gain) or acting on someone else agenda like all the ZIOPERATORS we routinely see shilling this website!!!

  10. Honeybee777  June 17, 2014 at 8:04 pm

    I am sorry for all those who have lost children, family, friends and schoolmates during the Sandy Hook School tragedy. It has been hard on us and I can assure those who are uncertain, no one would prefer this to be a hoax more than we. For our families and friends who still suffer today, please understand that it is easier for people to believe that politicians have made up this event to serve their personal agendas rather than believe a person could be so mentally unstable, as to murder our children. It may be more beneficial if people were to focus on the Mental Health aspect of our nation right now.

    • Jim Fetzer  June 17, 2014 at 8:57 pm

      The evidence is overwhelmingly against any children having died at Sandy Hook. On the contrary, it is FAR EASIER to simply accept the “official account”, which is being supported by local, state and federal authorities from the Newtown School Board and the Newtown Trustees to the Connecticut State Police, the Medical Examiner, the Governor and his Lt. Governor, Eric Holder and Barack Obama. So what you are claiming here is completely false and a gross misrepresentation, which is what we would expect from those who are perpetrating this hoax on the American people. You should be ashamed of yourself for posting this.

    • Honeybee777  June 17, 2014 at 9:43 pm

      Jim, I can’t be ashamed of reporting the truth. Sandy Hook/Newtown is exactly as reported. A nice, quiet little town, well up until the shooting. Our families have lived here for over 40 years and grieve for the families whose children died that day. We are grateful to the first responders for the trauma they endured after responding to the scene. These are children, which played with our children. No child should have to go through the death of a classmate and friend in such a violent way. They should not have had to witness the blood and shells on the ground as they passed slain friends. We are appreciative of the counselors because their need is great. There are nightmares and there will be scars. People are welcome to say anything is a hoax. If you should ever meet one of the parents, please be respectful as no one should ever lose a child before their time and especially in such a brutal manner.

    • Jim Fetzer  June 17, 2014 at 9:57 pm

      Do you really expect this kind of soft drivel to cut it here? You can’t account of any of the evidence, so you simply ignore it. We have a photo taken from a CSP chopper at Sandy Hook at 9 15, which is 20 minutes before the first 911 call. There was no surge of EMTs into the building to rush those little bodies off to hospitals, where doctors could determine whether they were dead or alive. There was no sense of urgency at the scene, no Med-Evac chopper, no ambulances, not even busses to evacuate the other 600 children! In fact, the only evidence of any other children having been there is a photograph (discussed above) that was falsely represented as having been taken at the time. The final reports from Connecticut authorities do not even include the names, ages or sex of any of the victims. You are trying to play the public for saps. It won’t work here.

    • Honeybee777  June 17, 2014 at 10:28 pm

      It’s funny how people think everything should play out a very specific and distinctive way, when in reality life just isn’t like that. Ask a first responder if textbook responses are normal and they’ll assure you it is far from it. While we unfortunately have the advantage of intimate knowledge of the events, you are relying on what information you can glean to make your conclusions. It doesn’t sound as if you have visited Sandy Hook or have done any true investigation of the facts. It may be something you wish to reconsider. People would certainly understand your retraction.

    • wolf  June 17, 2014 at 10:22 pm

      Honeybee666…are you a Mormon? It would figure since their state symbol is a beehive. Why? Because your religion was founded by Merovingian Freemasons and the bee was a Merovingian symbol representing an ordered society, i.e. every bee knew its place and did its job and ultimately served the queen.

      Are you a personal friend of the repugnant Robbie Parker per chance? Please give him my condolences…and tell him we are coming for him.

    • Jim Fetzer  June 17, 2014 at 10:34 pm

      It’s fascinating how she makes many assertions but offers no proof. And she clearly has no idea what she is talking about. Since everyone knew that Wolf was coming to Newtown–and I was with him–if this were an actual resident of the town, she would know who I am and that I was there. It’s therefore revealing that she has no idea who I am or that I addressed the Newtown School Board. See “The Newtown School Board meeting and the meaning of silence”, here at Veterans Today. She doesn’t even live in Sandy Hook. I may have spent more time there than she has. Unreal! See http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/05/01/the-newtown-school-board-meeting-and-the-meaning-of-silence/

  11. LC  June 17, 2014 at 4:26 pm

    Does anyone believe in this photo which is is supposed to be two of Santa Barbara shooter’s roommates stabbed to death (at the same time he was machine-gunning people on streets with two people in his car-himself & the shooter)!!!!


    • wolf  June 17, 2014 at 4:49 pm

      It definitely looks fake.

      These false flag shootings seem analogous to the buildings at the WTC in that; if one was wired for demo, they ALL were. Since Sandy Hoax, I am skeptical of ALL of them now and even speculate about whether we got the whole story about Columbine.

  12. Chandler  June 17, 2014 at 3:22 pm

    I’ve re-read this again and again, as well as every comment directly or indirectly to VT. To a few, I have a right to ask questions, comment and believe what I so desire from the facts printed or filmed. You have the right to condemn, chastise and make mockery of any of us for disagreeing.
    I, and probably many others, will hold firm to our “hoax” beliefs as you do to your “it actually happened” convictions. You all offer nothing to prove it took place. you don’t try. Just criticize. According to every tidbit of evidence I have encountered by 4 of the 5 senses I, like many others, were born with, Sandy Hook is a hoax until you, or the people of Newtown, prove otherwise. Newtown must be the most cowardice, drugged-up city in America. They have the most callous and funniest coroner. The most emotionally detached bunch of cowards in this nation. Undoubtedly, everyone in Newtown must be accomplices (or they profited if they remained silent.) As of today at this writing, I have seen nothing minor or major that points to a real tragedy. If a cop, coroner, sheriff, governor, ANYONE told any of us we could not see our children after being gunned down in a school shooting, think we’d just walk away saying oh, okay, let’s go get some pizza and get on with life? I would be in jail that very night for they have no legal authority to keep parents from seeing their dead children. NONE! Just watch Gene Rosen film? Watch the coroner!!
    Prove otherwise, and I will change my opinion.

  13. Harold Saive  June 17, 2014 at 2:45 pm

    Why is the NRA keeping quiet and not warning their members about the Sandy Hook evidence for False Flag gun grab? — Will anyone ever interview La Pierre get his response.? — Why isn’t NRA raising money to prosecute the Sandy Hook Hoax Perps? — It’s beginning to look like NRA and GOA are getting ready to “roll-over” on gun confiscation.

  14. Howard T.Lewis III  June 16, 2014 at 7:17 pm

    if pressured, the Sandy Hook perpetrators would come up with dead bodies to prove their point. They, like alcoholics, hold us hostage to maintain social dominance. The Pearl Harbor attack, sinking of the U.S.S. Maine, and other similar attacks had the IMPACT of the event as the goal. NOT the number of lives taken. The human sacrifice was for effect. The actual number of souls and their identities was relatively not central to the desired effect. Whether or not somebody actually died mattered ONLY if doubts that there were lives taken arose.

  15. ptwang  June 15, 2014 at 8:05 pm

    Seems a lot of commenters are shills but for those who aren’t – here’s a tip, don’t go to the debunk sites or videos first, there’s always a large number of issues with the story they don’t even bring up but you wouldn’t recognise that without first becoming familiar with the claims of it being a staged event.

  16. jglassel.  June 15, 2014 at 3:51 pm

    At about .35 of the camouflaged pants man video above, you can see the door to a shed wide open as the camouflaged men run past.

    At about 50 of Raw New Footage, the cops, SWAT or whoever are breaking into the shed “clearing” it and leaving the door open.

    It just seems weird that the camouflaged men would be running past an area already “secured.”

    Curious. There appears to be no shortage of ways into the woods. An actor late for work?

  17. LC  June 15, 2014 at 10:56 am

    Thank you Prof. Fetzer;-

    & best Fathers Day present for every father that NO children died in Sandy Hoax or other similar drills. -lc


  18. Jim Fetzer  June 15, 2014 at 8:44 am

    Did you bother to listen to my discussion of “False Flags” which is embedded in the article? If he had been told that “something like that” meant the slaughter of children in a Connecticut public school, sure, as the governor of the state, he would have taken steps to insure it did not happen. But he didn’t do that. The only option is that he was told that a drill would take place that would be presented as a live event, which is precisely what happened. I am sorry, but you really have not thought this through.

    • dirtus napus  June 15, 2014 at 9:26 am

      Have you made the connection to New Town (Port Arthur shooting) to Newtown, Conn?

      Same scenario- mental defective, same rifle, (Car-15 found in the house fire and had been previously destroyed in such a way it could never be fired again). Again we have an invalid moving like a top Oper, hitting everything from the hip rapidly and never missing. The shooter in Tasmania was seen multiple times getting headshots at 30 yards without aiming and hardly raising the rifle to his chest. The police communication was heard by witnesses “better get your boy outta there, we’re torching the house”.

      Both seminal, 1 worked, 1 hasn’t yet. And now all the Kenyan can talk about is the model of OZ gun control- by fiat this time…

      In their minds we must all be below 105 IQ…

  19. Allesandro  June 15, 2014 at 6:42 am

    So, lets look back briefly, about a year ago there was an announcement of a change in how PROPAGANDA is used against American citizens. Before the change it was suppose to be a line in the sand, NO propaganda was to be used on U.S. citizens. Then the change saying it is now O.K. for the Government to lie to it’s citizens. Then we have all these suspicious incidents, killings, some fictional some not. The Government lies to us ,just as they said they would (otherwise why the change). In fact they set-up the incidents to push for gun grabbing because they know a whole lot of illegal, murderous, treasonous activity is leaking out every day, and as it does they fear retribution from an armed citizenry.

    So these acts and the lies that follow are consistent with that policy change about a year ago. What’s so hard to discern?

    • ipod45  June 21, 2014 at 3:39 pm

      What so funny about this is, even the liberals of California are catching onto all of these lies and false flags. Handgun ownerships are up 10-fold in California. It seems the robots are turning against their master.

  20. ptwang  June 15, 2014 at 3:39 am

    Those saying Sandy Hook was real – why are you here? If I believed it was real, I wouldn’t spend so much time trying to convince others, that’s just weird – I’d have to be in on the charade or be paid to do that.

    • Rory Morrissey  June 15, 2014 at 9:44 am

      It probably would be better not to waste our time on trolls. But it’s hard not to respond when someone lashes out so ridiculously at something as painful as the Sandy Hook tragedy.

      On the other hand, it has been over a year now, why are you hoaxers still going on about something you don’t even believe happened? You don’t have to live with the pain, you can just move on to the next most relevant thing. It’s weird…I mean if I were you…I’d have to be in on the charade or be paid to do that.

    • ptwang  June 15, 2014 at 7:40 pm

      Sandy Hook is just part of a bigger picture, it has to be stopped and we want to see justice. Bottom line, we care – most other people are just too selfish to bother.

    • ipod45  June 21, 2014 at 3:45 pm

      So are you one of the many that paid off your mortgage on xmas day, or did the money man just give you cash to do what ever you wanted,has long has you stay with the talking points?

  21. jmreeves  June 14, 2014 at 6:59 pm

    It is ‘late at night’ (actually I just got up (in more ways maybe)
    So They Admitted it was all street theatre?
    Please pardon me, I’ll get back after a few pounds of coffee (just kidding)
    But Holy Shit..


  22. ptwang  June 14, 2014 at 5:58 pm

    Yes Sandy Hook was staged and nobody died but it’s harder to prove than other events – shouldn’t you expose the easier ones first and work your way up? eg. the use of dummies as victim and shooter at LAX and the multiple cases of injuries appearing on people long after the bombing in Boston. (Brassard family etc)

    • Jim Fetzer  June 14, 2014 at 6:41 pm

      Just go back and read my last half-dozen articles about Sandy Hook. It’s already blown apart. LAX was too simple to bother with. I am worried about your methodology. Can’t you accept that Sandy Hook has been exposed as a hoax–about as permanently and definitively as these things go?

    • ptwang  June 14, 2014 at 10:31 pm

      I can but not many have the patience to look at everything required to make the same determination. The problem is that most issues with the story have other ‘possible’ alternative explanations when looked at in isolation. Compare that with something more cut and dry like a 5 second video showing irrefutable faked injury, it just may be easier to snap people out of their trance.

      I guess I’m just saying that as long as we can convince the brainwashed masses of ANY of these events being staged, the flood gates should open to expose the rest and there may be easier routes than Sandy Hook – most people don’t seem to want to spend even a few minutes looking at this stuff.

    • Ed Chiarini  June 15, 2014 at 1:56 am

      Funny Jim how you demonize me when I told you this back during our interview, but now you are on board with it. hummm what gives?

    • Jim Fetzer  June 15, 2014 at 8:46 am

      I can’t believe you are such a gullible sap. They are here because exposing this charade is threatening to the local, state and federal government. As I explain in the program you apparently have not heard, Eric Holder, Attorney General, visited with the Governor and his Lt. less than a month before Sandy Hook. He appears to be the person who “spoke to” Gov. Malloy. Something is wrong when, after all the proof that has been adduced, you cling to a fantasy, which has been so thoroughly exposed.

  23. patmac  June 14, 2014 at 4:58 pm

    Several more shooters were reported by a number of Columbine Students. What about the fact that dozens of Sandy Hook homes hadTitle transfered for zero dollars on Christmas Day in 2009. Many of the People involved recipients these homes. Also several Parents of so called victims won state lottery more than once

    • ipod45  June 21, 2014 at 3:51 pm

      MY God now thats funny, Won the state lottery not once, but more than once. HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA …THIS IS TO FUNNY!!! Talk about stupid people. lol lol lol lol lol lol.

  24. Stewart Ogilby  June 14, 2014 at 4:44 pm

    Why are we belaboring the Sandy Hook nonsense? Anybody with an IQ above 100 can figure out it was phony if they spend on it a fraction of the time they spend watching TV. Of course, it is predictable that the masses won’t do that due to the upsetting aspect of cognitive dissonance. Please, Mr. Fetzer, let’s not all fall for one of the several motives for staging Sandy Hook, that of distracting those with curious minds from their 9/11 nonsense and exposing the TV networks. That would destroy their primary weapon, television news. How about moving on from the deliberately flawed stuff and cut to the heart of their manipulation?.

  25. Jim Fetzer  June 14, 2014 at 2:15 pm

    OF COURSE! They can’t produce photos or film BECAUSE IT DIDN’T HAPPEN. I am sorry, Toby, but you need to give this just a little more thought. Are you unaware that the final reports from the Connecticut authorities do not even include the names, ages or sex of the alleged victims? I think you need to get up-to-speed. Read “Top Ten Reasons Sandy Hook was an elaborate hoax”, which is still in the top 10 of the TOP 50 MOST READ ARTICLES.

    • williammartin  June 14, 2014 at 2:32 pm

      Awesome post and I watched the big video. While watching I noticed also something interesting. John Woodall MD on his Linked-IN page is tied to the Middle East’s Ottoman Empire and Uganda (Child Soldiers)
      See ***http //www.linkedin.com/pub/john-woodall-md/b/1b9/509

      It is just too odd that throughout the Hospital, his life/service that they are all tied to Unity Projects.

      Thanks for bringing this up.
      *Biblical warnings* Never go full shure-ity greeting your fellow man with a handshake.*
      I could not help but constantly think that this SYKEWAR was being done to American’s and by American’s. FAIL!

    • Jim Fetzer  June 14, 2014 at 3:26 pm

      Already done! I can’t believe you are unaware of the 16 questions that Wolfgang Halbig has put to the authorities in Connecticut, which they will not answer, including phone calls not returned and FOIA requests with no response. I will post a list of the articles about Sandy Hook I have published here on Veterans Today, but some you need to read include “Wolfgang Halbig heads to Newtown for the truth about Sandy Hook” and “The Newtown School Board meeting and the meaning of silence”. You need to keep up on Sandy Hook.

  26. Mike Kay  June 14, 2014 at 11:42 am

    Dr. Fetzer,
    Speaking personally, I appreciate your efforts to keep this issue front and center. It is quite obvious that the powers that be, and their lackeys, really are working overtime to bury this thing before all the truth comes out.
    What I find particularly interesting, is that those who support the government position cannot refute any of the testimony presented. They follow a narrow protocol, unleashing tirades and gnashing teeth while offering no proof to support their position. This is in itself suggests an agenda.
    Whenever one seeks to discredit a position, one illustrates the failures of the evidence to support this position, but we never see this, do we? Rather we are treated to lots of profanity, personal attacks, and blanket assertions.
    Yep, the powers that be know they screwed up big time, and they are really trying to invoke national amnesia with this false flag.

  27. joe chuy-medina  June 14, 2014 at 10:18 am

    heard and watched a u tube where the St Police chief said, when questioned about who cleaned up the blood and effluvium, that it was not needed. “there was carpeting on the floor.”

    that explains that. works for dog and cat pee, too.

    I have read Jim’s stuff for years, and read everything with a suspicious mind. yet, I have not had cause to disagree so far. as someone mentioned, it is intellect over emotion.

  28. Ignotzle  June 14, 2014 at 9:39 am

    Can anyone tell me why Wolfgang Halbig’s incredible efforts to expose the same are being ignored here?

    • Jim Fetzer  June 14, 2014 at 9:55 am

      You must not read Veterans Today very often. I have several recent articles about Wolf and traveled with him to Newtown. See, for example, “Wolfgang Halbig heads for Newtown for the truth about Sandy Hook”, http //www.veteranstoday.com/2014/03/24/wolfgang-halbig-heads-to-newtown-for-the-truth-about-sandy-hook/ and “The Newtown School Board meeting and the meaning of silence”, http //www.veteranstoday.com/2014/05/09/the-newtown-school-board-meeting-and-the-meaning-of-silence/ Now we have yet another school safety expert confirming Wolf’s conclusion that Sandy Hook was a hoax.

    • Ignotzle  June 14, 2014 at 10:04 am

      I realize that and watched the vid from Newtown. I just find it odd that his work is totally ignored in this article. Just my take. You must know I am here quite often. We have locked horns pretty voraciously in the past.

    • Jim Fetzer  June 14, 2014 at 12:10 pm

      It’s not about Wolf. It’s about Paul Peterson. His testimony complements and supports Wolf’s views. I publish a lot about Wolf. I went to Newtown with him. You are lost in your obsession with Wolf, not Sandy Hook. This is among the most important articles ever published on Sandy Hook. Get over it!

    • Ignotzle  June 14, 2014 at 12:27 pm

      I simply asked a question, but you decided to attack me. It was unnecessary, but typical to anyone who questions you. Thank you.

    • Ed Chiarini  June 20, 2014 at 5:18 am

      Hey Jim, check out Proctor Academy and you will find the location they shot the Sandy Hook BS. OH and you will find the Gene Rosen character and all the kids now 10 years older.

    • Ed Chiarini  June 20, 2014 at 5:04 am

      Jim you of all people should recognize WolfGAG, as he is Col Bo Grites , of the Ruby Ridge HOAX. As for you CT Gov. Malloy, I KNOW HIM PERSONALLY. He is Lee Bracker from AZ. You can see and hear him attempting to attack me with the Crown Princess Victoria of Sweden.
      Here is the short version https //www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZEDR5i0Q5nQ&index=5&list=LLyO7aSF7FYbGuRb8jCBJvbw

      So stop this BS that you are claiming you have all along said this was a hoax, since you bashed me when I said it on your show. One by one you will see EVERYTHING on the news is contrived an scripted. You can deny it all you want, but you WILL have to deal with my work once you realize there is no way around it.

      If you would have watched my latest documentary, you would hear it out of Hunts mouth and see there is NO WAY they would put ANYTHING on the TV that informs the viewers as that would put them out of business eventually as the people would become aware of the scam.. They CANNOT waste that air time showing you something that is the complete opposite policy of the corporation that exists strictly for profit. IT IS ALL 100% made up and scripted so they make a profit from it somehow or it would not be on the TV. The sooner you get this through your head the sooner you save whatever is left of your reputation.

  29. DaveE  June 14, 2014 at 9:30 am

    This is great, we seem to be on the cusp of a major awakening taking place. I just wish people would stop using the term “Nazis” for the scumbags that do these various false-flags, however. They have a lot more in common with Joe “The Little Jew” Stalin than with his professed enemy, Adolf Hitler.

    But nevermind, it’s a minor point right now. The real point is that people are starting to wake up to and unravel all the various Jew-lies we’re bombarded with, like 9/11, Sandy Hook (“The Bloomberg Blitz” I call it…..) and so many others.

    Someday we’ll get around to exposing the big-fat-Jew-lie of WWII and who we really fought for (Stalin) but in the meantime, I’ll settle for some 9/11 truth and Sandy Hook truth.

    • Yehuda_Abraham  June 14, 2014 at 9:54 am

      I was just about to post something similar. I listened to the interview right up to the point he started blubbering about “neon-nazis”, and how they talked to some “neon-nazis” and looked at “neon-nazi” websites and saw there was something going to happen.

      My ar$e. Where are these “neon-nazi” websites where the “neon-nazis” advertise they are going to blow up a high school? And some 17 year old Jew ( Dylan Klebold) is a “neon-nazi”? Give me a break.

    • ptwang  June 14, 2014 at 10:40 pm

      After reading justice4germans.com and other sites I agree with this but it’s hard not to get caught up in the “US/EU supports violent Nazi’s in Ukraine!” meme simply to combat the western propaganda.

  30. Chandler  June 14, 2014 at 8:34 am

    Brilliant!! We Americans have become tunas, and will accept the government bait as it is thrown at us. Now, where are the millions of dollars donated? A few got rich off this pathetic scheme. If we all had Mr. Fetzer’s backbone and patriotism, this government would fear us, instead of we cowering to them. No parents or public officials, one smiles, laughs, makes jokes, or snickers like this coroner, it they are facing a real tragedy involving the mass killing of children. This one video of this hulking “ah shucks” coroner convinced me of this entire hoax. I already had critical doubts, but that did it for me.
    My compliments to VT, and its staff, and the author for his dedication and determination to expose the truth.
    This is the purpose, and responsibility of the mainstream media. The USG couldn’t function as they have, and are, and get away with saying and doing these public officials say and do if these “presstitutes” would stand strong and together and side with We the People, and practice their true freedom of the press rights.
    You sir are to be commended for protecting your country against these “domestic” terrorists and traitors.

  31. jake gittes  June 14, 2014 at 7:28 am

    I thought it looked fake the first time I saw it, too. The coverage seemed “controlled” as if cameramen were only focusing on limited areas. I’ve shot lots of action photography and you don’t continuously point at one area where hardly anything is going on. I also wondered where were the wide shots of activity, people scrambling. It looked artificial.

    Later I saw more photos of “families” arriving/departing the scene. Again, as someone who has shot lots of action, the body language didn’t look right. One man was walking with a pre-school-aged girl riding on his shoulders, his purported wife walking along side them. They looked like they were sauntering toward an afternoon family event, like an outdoor music festival, not like a dangerous shooting. And who the hell would bring a little girl TO such an event?? A parent would want to keep the child as far away as possible. “Mom” would stay home with her while “Dad” went to see about “Junior.” FAKE.

    The shills are always particularly boisterous when articles hit too close to the truth. Hey John, wouldn’t your sister’s niece be your niece, too? Hey “Marc,” when I see fake, vulgar names like “marc isanasshole,” “that’s an instant do not trust for me.” And Jonathan Larson, how many FB accounts DO you have?

  32. JS  June 14, 2014 at 6:34 am

    I highly recommend Paul Preston’s comments about paying attention to the media reports in real time, as the initial event is happening. YES! That’s where you will see the screwups, before they have a chance to fix them. I have done a lot of drills, too. In my case, I heard about Sandy Hook on the radio, went home and put on the TV, on CNN and then Fox News. I almost immediately noticed what Paul noticed, the lack of panic. Then I noticed something else that was completely surreal. The Fox commentators were smiling, sneering, shaking their heads, etc. as they were talking and showing the footage, all inappropriate if this were real, and they WANTED the viewers to see that. I got the impression they were reading a script under protest. I got the message, all right. I shut off the TV that day, and it stayed off. Internet news, same thing. Most media organizations go back and revise their stories, scrubbing them of the initial mistakes. So you want to save the initial stories, not just the links to the stories.

    • JS  June 14, 2014 at 6:41 am

      Events rarely happen when it’s convenient for us to spend time watching TV news reports. But you can always press the Record button, and save the whole thing for playback later.

  33. JS  June 14, 2014 at 5:13 am

    The interview of Paul Preston is very good.

  34. etominusipi  June 13, 2014 at 10:21 pm

    if sloppy, how intentionally sloppy? though Dr Carver may be as good a pathologist as his name suggests, to a Scottish person wain carver might have grisly subliminal associations. but his press conference acting was as poor as his script. was a minor humiliation inflicted on him (remember Chuck Hagel) because he had made a nuisance of himself at an earlier planning stage? the bathetic patsy Gene Rosen was also humiliated. the Robbie Parker clip seemed a quasi-official leak of the fact that Sandy Hook was not for real. but after clawing back expenditure on bribes and actors fees with money collected from the public the manipulators can sit back and study the internet dissemination of information about a public-myth hoax. no kids are dead. quite angelic, really. is this just plain-vanilla RICO or does America needs new laws to regulate the behaviour of its government departments and agencies? and who will police them?

  35. Preston James, Ph.D  June 13, 2014 at 10:10 pm

    Bingo. Prof. Fetzer and his associate shred another thinly veiled staged False-Flag attack. yes, no dead kids, no dead teachers, no dead Lanzas, in fact no real Lanzas at all, all created as virtual computer based imaginary persons.

    There is no statute of limitations on Fraud and some day (hopefully soon) lying scumbag Lt. Vance needs to be charged with making terroristic threats against investigative journalists. This is a serious felony and he needs to be charged, arrested, convicted and sentenced to prison for at least 10 years. This whole Sandy Hook fraud involves numerous other felonies too, and could take down a significant portion of the local and state governments and put many in jail where they belong.

    All the phony victims families should be charged and sued for felony financial fraud and all their money taken under false pretenses “clawed Back”. In fact all the players could be prosecuted under RICO since their theft of funds by fraud involved many millions.

    Highest commendations to Prof. Fetzer, Sophia Smallstrom and Paul Preston. This is very fine investigative journalism to say the least.

    • JS  June 14, 2014 at 6:14 am

      Hear, hear. Just as Al Capone was brought down by finances, these guys could be taken down under RICO.

    • JS  June 14, 2014 at 6:48 am

      I think the fastest results, as always, will come from a civil lawsuit. If I had sent the “victims” and the town even one red cent, I would sue them for fraud. But I didn’t donate money. Those who did donate, need to file a class action lawsuit. Come on, there has to be a hungry lawyer willing to take this one. Also, there was federal and state taxpayer money spent on bilking us all. I’m not sure how taxpayers could sue but, again, I’m sure there’s a hungry lawyer somewhere who could take this on.

    • Preston James, Ph.D  June 14, 2014 at 8:46 am

      Yes, JS that is a brilliant idea. Hopefully the naive true believers in every Controlled major mass Media propaganda will wake up and seek redress with a large class action lawsuit. It has been estimated that the funds defrauded from the public and the taxpayers may approach 50 million USD.

    • dave mann  June 14, 2014 at 9:22 am

      Preston James – I’ve seen some peculiarities with the Columbine event – what looks like a dummy being dragged out and dumped on the lawn – the security cam footage anomalies – are you prepared to assure us that event was bona fide and as advertised. It may not be a crystal clear fake – like Sandy Hook – but those were the days when things were not as scrutinized as they are today. ???

    • Ed Chiarini  June 20, 2014 at 5:15 am

      Yeah JAMES, as you know no crime was committed so there will never be a law suit. In face they are permitted by law to act this way. But you already know this. Hey, can you get me some dodgers tickets for this upcoming season? Ah, never mind, you will probably deny knowing anything, especially when it comes to the columbine HOAX. I’m the one that exposed the DUMMY FOOTAGE. https //www.youtube.com/watch?v=DcQ58fNqezg

    • Jim Fetzer  June 20, 2014 at 7:41 am

      Ed Charini (aka DallasGoldBug) is the same guy who claims that JFK was not killed in Dallas but that he and Jackie have assumed the identities of Jimmy Carter and Rosalynn. You sort it out!

  36. wolf  June 13, 2014 at 9:50 pm

    Wayne’s world;

    “…uh but this probably is the worst I have seen or uh the worst uh that I know of any of my colleagues having seen and uh that all the more makes me uh ah proud and and grateful to our staff who uh uh to a man have uh have just uh behaved uh most professionally uh uh uh and and strongly and um I hope uh I hope they and I hope uh the people of Newt-town uh don’t have it crash on their head later…but…uh…”

    –Wayne the ‘Carver’…from press conference December 15, 2012

    Guess what Mr Fetzer…it’s crashing.

  37. stephanaugust  June 13, 2014 at 9:19 pm

    A provocative question comes into mind. For what are active shooter drills or anti terror drills good for when the majority is done by perpetrators connected to governments?

    • Denyse Pez  June 14, 2014 at 4:25 am

      Great question…I can only imagine the costs for such bribery to all players and for what? They’re too sloppy to ever be believed.

  38. Howard T.Lewis III  June 13, 2014 at 9:16 pm

    This series of false and actually violent inroads by the Bush criminal cabal and The City of London should be halted by as expedient as possible and as efficiently as is physically possible. Empathy should never be considered a weakness or abused by sons of bitches and miscreants or other genetic slag as has occupied the White House over the past several administrations. The City of London owns and controls the nationwide corporate news media and I advocate termination of their ownership of these businesses and institutions at once..

    • ani  June 13, 2014 at 9:35 pm

      Have You viewed the Snordster video on VT “NSA Spying Never Catches Israel…”?

      Very seriously worth watching.

    • Howard T.Lewis III  June 14, 2014 at 7:31 pm

      Yep. People should believe this important piece of news that I break here. Satanists actually sacrifice innocent people, in a tradition observed by royal houses of Europe and the Vatican for centuries. In 1989, the Utah Attorney general took 45 statements from 60 witnesses who came forward as personal witnesses and victims of blood sacrifice. I, myself, have seen one video confiscated from a satanic cult in a midwest town featuring the stabbing murder of a young teenager as a sacrifice. It was real. If victims are needed to push their agenda, victims will be provided by the willing minions of her Satanic Majesties or by whoever the cult leader succeeds in arranging. If Sandy Hook victims’ bodies are demanded for examination, they will be provided, if not placed in the coffins already. We are talking total scumbags here, folks. Note who the Grand Patrons are for satanism in the form of Freemasonic ritual. Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip at this time. If they ‘require’ the spilling of human blood at anywhere, any time of the night or day, 24/7, it happens. That is satanism. Give me the badge and I will take them down.

    • Chandler  June 16, 2014 at 1:31 pm

      Howard T. I always read what you write as I do ani’s entries. Why don’t you write a book and tell us the whole story? Your knowledge is vast and what you have to say very interesting as is many contributors. Inthis day and age of self-publishing, the elite could not stop you. You know many details and facts which many need to know. Write for VT if they’ll have you. YOU have a lot to say. I know JFK, and that is about all. You have facts and details We the People…l need to know. ani and Tyrone (who is no loner commenting here,) should write either here as a columnist or pen a book. You are another who obviously has it together, and would help awaken the people of this nation. I truly appreciate what you write. It is startling and frightful to discover the people in control are far beyond evil. Think about it Howard T. Please!!

    • ani  June 16, 2014 at 2:46 pm

      The Tap Blog has an excellent video on Kevin Annett and the latest development on Common Law Courts/sheriffs seeking to confront the Ninth Circle covens in Dublin and Montreal August 2014. Seems that the Jesuit Superior General has resigned. The most outstanding feature of Annett’s talks are his fearlessness in Direct Action and claims that the greatest growth in Common Law numbers after America, are in UK. I am certainly a keen supporter for the same in Australia. I am almost physically sick when certain ‘types’ spiel their guff on my parents’ television, like last night, some idjet on Australian alliance with America in Iraq on ‘humanitarian’ grounds, all the while assiduously ignoring the mass slaughters. Also, the Save the Children spokespersons parsimoniously lecturing on their plight and asking for donations. Not too many seem to enquire as to the reasons for all this death and dispossession, and when I pipe up, well, you know the rest.

      Hi Chandler. Thank You as always for Your presence here, and Your wonderful support. You too, have an abundance of talent and value from which we all benefit. I must run now, but more later 😉

    • ani  June 15, 2014 at 8:22 pm

      Howard it was your words

      -Empathy should never be considered a weakness or abused by sons of bitches and miscreants or other genetic slag as has occupied the White House over the past several administrations. The City of London owns and controls the nationwide corporate news media and I advocate termination of their ownership of these businesses and institutions at once..-

      which prompted my June 13 reply.

      Empathy and sensitivity are two characteristics that are typically and o too successfully decimated by TPTB.

      Your tenacity, persistence and righteous rage are to be respected and translated into action.

  39. Howard T.Lewis III  June 13, 2014 at 9:10 pm

    This series of false violent inroads by the Bush criminal cabal and The City of London should be halted by as expedient as possible and as efficiently as is physically possible.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

From Veterans Today Network